| Agenda | Consolidated |
City Council |
| Meeting No. | 55 | Contact | Marilyn Toft, Manager | |
| Meeting Date | Monday, August 25, 2014 Tuesday, August 26, 2014 Wednesday, August 27, 2014 Thursday, August 28, 2014 | Phone | 416-392-7032 | |
| Start Time | 9:30 AM | clerk@toronto.ca | ||
| Location | Council Chamber, City Hall |
The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed. The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.
Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.
Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.
The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.
The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.
Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).
August 21, 2014 toronto.ca/council This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.
|
| Routine Matters - Meeting 55 |
| RM55.1 | Presentation |
|
| Ward:All |
| Call to Order |
| Council has voted to consider the following items at specific times: First item Monday August 25: EX44.3 - Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place Second item Monday August 25: LS30.1 - Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs Considered together as the first items on Tuesday August 26: The following items will be considered together: |
| Summary |
• O Canada • Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act
|
| RM55.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Confirmation Minutes |
| Summary |
City Council will confirm the Minutes from the special meeting held on July 7, 2014 and the regular meeting held on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014. |
| RM55.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials |
| Summary |
Deferred Committee Item: Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE21.14 Licensing and Standards Committee Item LS28.3 Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG34.3 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW32.14 Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.6 Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.12
Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 44 on August 20, 2014 Submitted by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Chair
Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 33 on August 18, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair
Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 31 on August 14, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair
Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 33 on August 19, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair
Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 32 on August 11, 2014 Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair
Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 30 on August 18, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair
Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 29 on August 15, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Chair
Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 35 on August 7, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Josh Colle, Chair
Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 33 on August 13, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair
Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 35 on August 12, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Chair
Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 34 on August 12, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair
Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 34 on August 12, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair
Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 34 on August 12, 2014 Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair
New Business submitted by City Officials |
| RM55.4 | Information |
|
| Ward:All |
| Petitions |
| Summary |
Members of Council may file petitions. |
| RM55.5 | Presentation |
|
|
|
| Presentations, Introductions and Announcements |
| Summary |
Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting. |
| RM55.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Review of the Order Paper |
| Summary |
City Council will review the Order Paper. |
| Background Information |
| Order Paper August 25, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73162.pdf) Order Paper August 26, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73163.pdf) Order Paper August 27, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73164.pdf) Order Paper August 28, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73165.pdf) |
| Deferred Items - Meeting 55 |
| (Deferred by City Council from March 20, 2014 - 2013.TE21.14) (Deferred by City Council from October 8, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14) (Deferred by City Council from July 16, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14) (Deferred by City Council from March 21, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14) (Deferred by City Council from February 20, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14) |
| TE21.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Final Report - 25 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE21.14a with recommendations) |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 25 Ontario Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 13 to the report (December 18, 2012) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. An indexed cash contribution of $400,000.00 which will be allocated towards the North St. Lawrence Market redevelopment, the implementation of the Heritage Lighting Master Plan for Old Town Toronto and the Heritage Interpretation Master Plan for Old Town Toronto, and local streetscape improvements, the design of which will be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. At least ten, three-bedroom dwelling units, bedroom to be defined as a habitable room which meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code, shall be provided in the building.
ii. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 - required, and Tier 2 - enhanced, performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.
iii. Design and construction of proposed development on the lot substantially in conformity with the architectural design identified on elevation plans on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, prepared by Burka Architects, dated November 30, 2012, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, the details of which, including the exterior materials, will be refined on approved plans and drawings in the context of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114, of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended and, as applicable, Section 41 of the Planning Act, as amended, and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City.
iv. Prior to final site plan approval the owner shall provide a noise impact study and emissions study, which shall be peer reviewed by the city at the owner's cost; the owner shall incorporate appropriate mitigation, attenuation or equivalent measures into the design of the proposed building in response to the findings of the peer reviewed studies, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
v. Prior to final site plan approval, the owner shall provide a pedestrian level wind study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
vi. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the owner shall:
a. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the conservation work described in the HIA, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant detailing all recommended interventions, and estimated costs for all conservation work satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Submit final landscape plans and drawings, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
c. Submit an Interpretation Plan that fully interprets the heritage values of the Drug Trading Company Administrative Office to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
d. Submit a Lighting Plan that describes how the building will be sensitively illuminated at night to enhance the building’s heritage character to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
vii. Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the heritage property, 25 Ontario Street, including a permit for the demolition, excavation, and or shoring of the subject property, the applicant shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; the owner shall:
a. Submit final building permit plans and drawings for the alterations and new construction, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Provide a Letter of Credit in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure the approved conservation work.
c. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs and a certificate of completion prepared by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
viii. The Owner retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended) to carry out a Stage 2 archaeological resource assessment of the subject property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. (i.e., Stage 3-4).
The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 2 assessment, any recommendations for Stages 3-4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation.
a. The Owner shall ensure that no demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City’s Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.
b. Prior to final Site Plan approval, the Owner shall submit a copy of the relevant assessment report(s) to the Heritage Preservation Services Unit in both hard copy format and as an Acrobat PDF file on compact disk.
c. Prior to final Site Plan approval the Owner shall incorporate significant archaeological resources and findings into the proposed development through either in situ preservation and interpretation where feasible, or commemorate and interpret the resources through exhibition development on site including, but not limited to, commemorative plaquing.
d. Prior to the release of any above grade permit for the subject property, the Owner shall provide a Letter of Credit in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure any on-site interpretation as may be required.
e. Prior to the return of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall implement site interpretation as may be required, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to submit a noise impact and emissions study to the City, which shall be peer reviewed by the City at the Owner’s cost, addressing the impacts of both noise and exhaust emanating from the property at 280 King Street East onto the proposed development and the appropriate mitigation, revisions or equivalent measures required to be incorporated by the Owner into the design of the proposed development, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
6. City Council direct that the local capital improvement portion of the cash-in-lieu of parkland payment (i.e., 25 percent) made pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act with respect to the development be directed to improvements within the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood and King-Parliament areas. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 22, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (December 18, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes the redevelopment of the property at 25 Ontario Street with a 21-storey mixed-use building, consisting of commercial uses on the ground floor and a residential condominium above. The proposal includes the retention of the north and west walls of the existing listed heritage building. A total of 219 dwelling units, including 35% at two–bedroom or larger, and 198 vehicular parking spaces in five levels of below-grade parking are proposed. The applicant is seeking to attain Tier Two of the Toronto Green Standard for the proposed development.
The proposed building, with its heritage retention and contextually sensitive massing represents the type of built form that is consistent with the planning framework and emerging built form for this area of King-Parliament.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (December 18, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 25 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-53903.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Report Item TE21.14 deferred at City Council on March 20, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68592.pdf) (August 11, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 25 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application (TE21.14a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72965.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Joe Berridge, Urban Strategies Inc. |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (January 22, 2013) Letter from Neil M. Smiley, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (TE.Supp.TE21.14.1)
(December 13, 2012) Letter from E. Stuart Bowden, SAS, addressed to the City Planning Division (TE.Supp.TE21.14.2) |
| (Deferred by City Council from June 10, 2014 - 2014.LS28.3) |
| LS28.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators |
| Communications LS28.3.5 and LS28.3.6 have been submitted on this Item |
| Public Notice Given |
| Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to consider expanding its licensing requirements to include wildlife control operators.
2. City Council receive for information the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 28, 2014) from the City Solicitor concerning the legal feasibility of licensing wildlife control operators.
3. City Council direct that the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 28, 2014) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Licensing and Standards Committee requested the Medical Officer of Health to prepare a report on diseases that could be transmitted to residents from urban wildlife in Toronto, such report to be available for use by Councillors and Animal Services staff. |
| Origin |
| (March 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
At its March 19, 2013 meeting, the Licensing and Standards Committee requested staff to report back on the feasibility of licensing wildlife control operators. Committee expressed concern that without regulation, individuals performing wildlife control activities pose a risk to both consumers (e.g. disease and fraud) and wildlife (e.g. injury and death).
A review of relevant legislation indicates that there are provincial laws in place to protect wild animals and residents of Toronto from unqualified wildlife removal companies. These laws are enforced by the Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) and Ministry of Consumer Services.
Stakeholder consultations and research revealed some concerns with the activities of wildlife control operators, although the issues cannot be generalized to the entire industry.
Accordingly, this report recommends referring the matter to the Province of Ontario for consideration because it is the level of government with direct responsibility for wildlife management and the regulation of wildlife control activities such as hunting and trapping.
Referral to the provincial government is also advisable because a municipal licensing by-law for wildlife control operators could be declared invalid by the courts for conflicting with existing provincial legislation, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 (the "Act"). Although the Act establishes a licensing regime for persons that hunt or trap wildlife, it also provides an exemption to this licensing requirement. The Act allows a person to harass, capture or kill wildlife without a licence where the person reasonably believes that wildlife is damaging or is about to damage that person's property. The Act extends this exemption to persons in the business of removing nuisance wildlife for the same purpose.
Municipal Licensing and Standards through Toronto Animal Services will provide resources on its website to educate the public on what rules govern wildlife control and what factors to consider when hiring a wildlife control operator.
Legal Services was consulted in the preparation of this report. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (March 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-68427.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Report Item LS28.3 deferred at City Council on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72994.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Robin Howarth, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (OFMF) (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (March 14, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Therese Corrado (LS.Main.LS28.3.1)
(March 18, 2014) Memo from Lia Laskaris, Manager, Animal Alliance of Canada, Liz White, Leader, Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada and Barry MacKay, Canadian Representative, Born Free (LS.Main.LS28.3.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/comm/communicationfile-46723.pdf) (May 23, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (LS.New.LS28.3.3) (May 26, 2014) Submission from Robin Howarth, General Manager, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (LS.New.LS28.3.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/comm/communicationfile-47767.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (March 18, 2014) Submission from Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, Ward 38 Scarborough Centre (CC.Main.LS28.3.5)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48405.pdf) (June 4, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.Supp.LS28.3.6) |
| 3a | Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators |
| Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege |
| Origin |
| (March 28, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
This report provides legal advice with respect to LS27.2, the Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (March 28, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-68428.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| 3b | Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators - Supplementary Report |
| Origin |
| (May 9, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
At its meeting of March 18, 2014, Licensing and Standards Committee deferred consideration of the report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, headed "Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators" to its next meeting, and requested a further report on a motion to license wildlife control operators.
As indicated in the previous report, issues of wildlife management appropriately reside with the Province of Ontario. However, if City Council directs Municipal Licensing and Standards (ML&S) to develop a licensing system for wildlife control operators, staff will need to do further work to develop such a program and report back on amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing, and on the resulting financial implications to ML&S' operating and capital budgets through the 2015 budget process.
This report outlines the steps necessary and preliminary financial estimates to undertake a licensing system for wildlife control operators in the City of Toronto. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (May 9, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69196.pdf) |
| (Deferred by City Council from July 8, 2014 - 2014.PG34.3) |
| PG34.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report |
| The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG34.3b with recommendations) |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend the City of Toronto Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 30 Ordnance Street attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to modify OPA 231, Section 17 with respect to Chapter 6, Section 14, Garrison Common North Secondary Plan, Site and Area Specific Policy No. 8 for 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance and 45 Strachan Avenue to increase the minimum employment space to include an additional 2,140 square metres and easterly boundary adjustment or, in the alternative, if OPA 231 is appealed, request the Ontario Municipal Board to amend OPA 231 in a similar manner;
3. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 159-2012, being a By-law to amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 30 Ordnance Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (June 16, 2014), from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
4. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the supplementary report (June 16, 2014), from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
5. Before introducing the bills contemplated in Recommendations 1, 3 and 4 above to Council for enactment, City Council require the adjustment of the proposed boundary between 30 Ordnance Street and the future park has been accepted in accordance with the Park Reconveyance Agreement dated April 16, 2012 between the City of Toronto and Build Toronto Inc to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Real-Estate Services;
6. Before introducing the bills contemplated in Recommendation 4 above to Council for enactment, the City shall have received the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing’s Decision on Official Plan Amendment 231 approving the conversion of 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue from Employment to Mixed Use designation or, should OPA 231 be appealed, the Ontario Municipal Board decision regarding any appeals subject to 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue in respect of Official Plan Amendment 231 and any necessary amendment to OPA 231 to increase the minimum non-residential gross floor area as contemplated in Recommendation 2 above, will have been approved;
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required, including, as necessary, minor adjustments to the boundary between 30 Ordnance Street and the future park at 10 Ordnance Street which maintain the intent outlined in the report dated May 28, 2014, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
8. Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in recommendations 1, 3 and 4 to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner(s) to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following, at the owner's expense, in connection with 45 Strachan Avenue, 30 Ordnance Street, and 11 and 25 Ordnance Street, referred to as Blocks 1, 2, and 3 respectively:
i. Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $3,000,000.00 toward the cost of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycling Bridge, including work to accommodate the bridge landings within the South Stanley Park extension, the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street, and/or Fort York National Historic Site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor;
ii. Prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall construct, or cause to be constructed, any grading works and retaining walls necessary to implement the above-base grading at 10 Ordnance Street and having a minimum value of $1,500,000.00, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor;
iii. Prior to issuance of a below-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall have entered into an agreement to secure the relocation of Eva’s Phoenix, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with applicable civic officials;
iv. Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $750,000.00 toward the acquisition and/or construction of community services and/or facilities within the development at the Ordnance Triangle as may be agreed to between the parties, or within the vicinity of the development and in Ward 19, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor;
v. The cash contributions identified in recommendation 8. i, ii, and, iv. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment and in the case of recommendation 8. ii, to the date of construction;
vi. Prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner shall submit a Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including wind tunnel analysis, which identifies recommendations for the pedestrian realm and the outdoor areas of the podiums to mitigate wind impacts year-round. The owner shall incorporate and maintain in support of the development all recommended mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
vii. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1, 2 and 3, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan, for each phase, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter, shall implement the plan during the course of construction, with details to be included in the Section 37 Agreement;
viii. Prior to issuance of a below-grade building permit for a building on each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner will provide written confirmation to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, that all proposed crash mitigation measures are acceptable to Metrolinx and shall incorporate all measures into the plans and drawings submitted in the context of site plan approval pursuant to s114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended, and s41 of the Planning Act, as amended and as applicable;
ix. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the first building on Block 2, the owner shall ensure that arrangements are in place to provide for the temporary relocation of existing access routes and access easements in favour of Metrolinx within the easterly limit of Block 2 (formerly part of 10 Ordnance Street) to an alternative location through 10 Ordnance Street providing access to the Metrolinx infrastructure at the ‘tip lands’, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation;
x. Prior to the issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall, to the satisfaction of Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and Metrolinx, be responsible to provide for interim relocation of any Metrolinx access to its infrastructure at the "tip lands" over 10 Ordnance Street to a service road north of the Ordnance Triangle. The subject owner's responsibilities for providing any required interim access shall include the following:
a. design and construction of alternative vehicular access for Metrolinx from Ordnance Street over other lands within the Ordnance Triangle, with the design and any details related to this access;
b. obtaining all necessary approvals and registering temporary easements over the Ordnance Triangle Lands as may be required to allow the contemplated alternative interim access by Metrolinx to the north service road from Ordnance Street;
c. removal of access and release of any existing access easements in favour of Metrolinx over 10 Ordnance Street;
xi. Prior to registration of a plan of condominium on Block 1 the owner shall be responsible for the following, to the satisfaction of Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services:
a. design and construction of vehicular access from Strachan Avenue to be shared by Blocks 1 and 2 and provide Metrolinx with shared access to its north service road, located north of Block 2, or an alternative arrangement. The design and any details related to this access, including but not limited to parking restrictions.
b. obtain all necessary approvals to facilitate the appropriate land ownership or easement arrangements for the Strachan Avenue shared access.
xii. The timing of items x and xi, above may be amended only with the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, and the General Manager, Transportation Services;
xiii. Prior to the issuance of an above-grade permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner will provide, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, a public realm phasing plan detailing the phased improvements to the public realm including, but not limited to, paving and curbing details, sidewalk treatments, cycling infrastructure, pedestrian and cycling connections to the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street, and other matters which may be considered by City Staff through the review of these public realm phasing plans, all of which shall be implemented in the context of the site plan approval for the Block to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
xiv. Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within each of Blocks 1 and 3, and in support of the development the owner shall provide, at no cost to the City, any improvements to municipal infrastructure as required throughout each phase of development, as identified in the Phasing Drawings, prepared by Odan/Dectech Group, and dated May 21, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Services;
xv. Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within either Block 1 or 3, and in support of the development, the owner shall make a cash payment in an amount to be determined by Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Services, as a cost sharing contribution to Strachan Avenue improvements to be undertaken by the City, which includes but may not be limited to, introduction of northbound and southbound left turn lanes, northbound right turn lane, introduction of a traffic signal control at Strachan Avenue / Wellington Street, and a southbound realignment of East Liberty Street west of Strachan Avenue;
xvi. The owner shall acknowledge and agree to warning clauses with respect to each of Blocks 1 and 3, which the owner shall include in initial offers of purchase and sale as well as appropriate condominium documents, addressing the potential noise and vibration from the adjacent railways and from programs /events at the Fort York National Historic Site to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Divison;
xvii. Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within Block 2, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $100,000.00 to be allocated toward the costs associated with the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge and/or improvements to the area park space at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Divison, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, as required pursuant to the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board issued September 9, 2013 (OMB File PL130565) in connection with minor variance application A0915/12TEY. Such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the Ontario Municipal Board Decision to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City; and
xviii. The owner shall provide and maintain public pedestrian walkways and shall convey public access easements to the City, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as generally illustrated on Figure 4 of the Urban Transportation Considerations Report, prepared by BA Group dated November 2013, with details, including timing for delivery of the easements, to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the subject Block and such easement lands to be maintained by the owner of the subject Block.
9. City Council request the Director of Affordable Housing Office in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the August 12, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council with the details regarding the provision of affordable ownership units by Build Toronto Inc. within the Ordnance Triangle, and the mechanism through which the provision of these units will be secured;
10. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 Agreements; and
11. City Council authorize cash-in-lieu funds generated through the Alternative Rate Parkland Dedication By-law in connection with 30 Ordnance Street as well as 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue that are above the first 5 percent to be directed for use to construct the Above Base Park Improvements to the future park within 10 Ordnance Street, the South Stanley Park extension, and/or Fort York National Historic Site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee:
1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the appropriate city officials and the Ward Councillor, to report directly to City Council, on the following matters:
a. Amending Recommendation 8.ii. from the recommendations Section of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to specify the contribution of the applicant towards the above-base grading and retaining wall construction related to the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street;
b. Amending Recommendation 8.xi from the recommendations Section of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to specify the details of the applicant’s cost-sharing contribution to the Strachan Works, including the introduction of northbound and southbound left turn lanes, a northbound right turn lane, introduction of a traffic signal control at East Liberty Street/Strachan Avenue and Strachan Avenue/ Wellington Street, and a southwards realignment of East Liberty Street west of Strachan Avenue; and
c. Amending the Draft Zoning By-laws for 30 Ordnance Street (Attachment 1) and 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue (Attachment 2) of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to provide for an alternate arrangement for the provision of residential visitors parking spaces, with these residential visitors spaces potentially being located, in whole or part, within the commercial garage, and to reduce the rate of required residents parking spaces. |
| Origin |
| (May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the construction of two mixed-use base buildings with three residential towers at heights of 39, 33, and 24 storeys, comprising 1012 residential units and 10,810 square metres of non-residential floor space at 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue. A new public park is proposed on the lands at 10 Ordnance Street. This application also proposes amendments to Official Plan Amendment 125 and to Zoning By-law 159-2012 to modify existing permissions for two residential buildings at 30 Ordnance Street (10 115786 STE 19 OZ). All lands subject to this application are collectively referred to as the “Ordnance Triangle”.
The Ordnance Triangle lands have been approached as a comprehensively planned development. City staff, in collaboration with Build Toronto and the applicant, have considered, among many matters, the relationship to nearby open spaces, Liberty Village, and Fort York National Historic Site, opportunities to improve pedestrian and vehicle connections, the proximity to the adjacent railway lines, the relationship to the proposed future park space, and connections to existing and proposed cycling infrastructure, including the new Fort York pedestrian and Cycling Bridge.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments subject to the provisions contained in this report. The recommendations contained within this report conform to the policies of the City's Official Plan, and City Council approved OPA 231. As the Minister of the Municipal Affairs and Housing has yet to approve OPA 231, any bills related to 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue will be held until such time as the Minister issues a decision on OPA 231. Bills related to 30 Ordnance Street may be allowed to proceed in advance of the Minister’s decision, as these lands have existing residential use permissions, but will be held until such time as a boundary adjustment of the 30 Ordnance Street property is completed. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (May 28, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70291.pdf) (May 28, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70298.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Report Item PG34.3 deferred at City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72995.pdf) (August 15, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application (PG34.3b) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73073.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Cynthia MacDougall, Partner, McCarthy Tetrault |
| 3a | 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report |
| Origin |
| (June 16, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
A report dated May 28, 2014, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to construct two mixed-use buildings with towers at heights of 39, 34, and 24 storeys, comprising 1012 residential units and 10,810 square metres of non-residential floor space at 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue. The report also recommends approval of amendments to Official Plan Amendment 125 and to Zoning By-law 159-2012 to modify existing permissions for two residential buildings at 30 Ordnance Street (10 115786 STE 19 OZ). All lands subject to this application are collectively referred to as the “Ordnance Triangle”. Two By-law amendments reflecting these developments were to be attached to that report.
The purpose of this report is to provide supplemental information to the May 28, 2014 report regarding Section 37 conditions with regard to road improvements and other matters. This report also attaches the draft by-law amendments both with respect to 30 Ordnance Street as well as 10, 11, 25 Ordnance Street / 45 Strachan Avenue. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 16, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70851.pdf) |
| (Deferred by City Council from July 8, 2014 - 2014.PW32.14) |
| PW32.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act |
| Communication PW32.14.1 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Principle 5.1.4 in Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services by deleting the words "Only lands greater than 100 m2 in size may utilize the < 1.0 m width exemption" so that it reads:
"5.1.4. Exemptions regarding applicability of the City's procedures and criteria to small parcels of land for land conveyances under the Planning Act will be assessed first by size (to be either less than or greater than 100 m2) as summarized in revised Table 1."
2. City Council adopt the "Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act" as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, as amended by Part 1 above. |
| Origin |
| (June 3, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services Division |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval of a City policy titled "Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act". This policy updates and consolidates the City of Toronto's procedures and criteria for the acceptance of potentially contaminated lands conveyed to the City as a condition of a Planning Act application approval.
The policy formalizes processes that have been in place and applied for the past twelve years and updates those processes by incorporating the Ministry of the Environment's recently updated requirements for contaminated lands.
The outcome of adopting the policy will: (1) provide more certainty and clarity to City staff and the development industry about the City’s expectations and requirements for accepting potentially contaminated lands; (2) continue to minimize the City’s liabilities related to accepting conveyed lands; and (3) continue to safeguard public health and the environment. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 3, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70165.pdf) (June 18, 2014) Revised Table 1 - Application Requirements - Procedures and Criteria of the Peer Review Process for Land Conveyances under the Planning Act (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70829.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Report Item PW32.14 deferred at City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72980.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Rachael Lee, Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Policy and Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), Alex Gill, Executive Director, Ontario Environment Industry Association and Eric K. Pringle, President, Canadian Brownfields Network (CC.New.PW32.14.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49536.pdf) |
| (Deferred by City Council from July 8, 2014 - 2014.TE33.6) |
| TE33.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Final Report - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (June 11, 2014), from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:
a. The provision of 21 rental housing units, including 13 affordable rental housing units and 8 mid-range rental housing units, all of which are live-work units, and their maintenance as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and as provided for in Schedule "A" of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment.
b. $150,000.00 for the purpose of capital improvements to existing rental housing units provided by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in Ward 19.
c. $100,000.00 for the purpose of improving existing parks in Ward 19.
d. Noise and vibration mitigation measures as identified in the Addendum to the Environmental Noise & Vibration Feasibility Study dated April 7, 2014, prepared by Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc., and the associated peer review dated April 11, 2014, prepared by Aercoustics Engineering Limited.
e. Odour mitigation measures as identified in the Assessment of Potential Odour Impacts from a Nearby Abattoir dated December 2012, prepared by Zorix Environmental, and the associated peer review dated November 26, 2013, prepared by Ortech Environmental.
f. Warning clauses and restrictive covenants in all purchase and sale agreements regarding the potential for noise and odour impacts from the nearby abattoir and the potential for noise impacts from road and rail sources, as detailed under the heading "Section 37 of the Planning Act" of this report.
g. A minimum of 30 on-street bicycle parking spaces.
h. Car-share agreement in place prior to construction, if car-share parking spaces replace parking spaces otherwise required for residential occupants, at a ratio of 1 car-share parking space to 4 residential occupant parking spaces, up to a maximum of 6 car-share parking spaces.
i. A minimum of 30% of all the dwelling units on the lot shall be 2-bedroom units.
j. A minimum of 10% of all the dwelling units on the lot shall be 3-bedroom units.
k. A Construction Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
l. A Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the properties located at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street dated February 2012 and revised March 2014, prepared by Bernard H. Watt Architect, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
m. A Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, to be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any permit for the properties at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage buildings.
4. City Planning provide further information on the provision of 21 rental housing units in the proposed development and propose any needed adjustments to the draft Zoning By-law attached as Attachment No. 7 through a Supplementary Report to Toronto and East York Community Council at the meeting scheduled for either June 17, 2014, or August 12, 2014.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, City Council require that the owner shall have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to provide details of the implementation for the rental housing provision of the recommendation to City Council for consideration at its meeting on July 8, 2014.
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes the redevelopment of the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed-use development which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings facing Niagara Street, commonly referred to as the "coffin factory", and the addition of two residential towers 12 and 14 stories in height connected by a five-storey podium. The proposed uses include six ground floor commercial/office units and 367 residential dwellings, all of which permit live-work units.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the current Official Plan and with the City Council-approved amendments to the Official Plan (Official Plan Amendment No. 231) currently awaiting Ministerial approval. The rezoning will provide for the rehabilitation of the existing heritage buildings through a Heritage Easement Agreement. Appropriate noise and odour mitigation measures will be secured that address land use compatibility between the proposed mixed-use development and the nearby abattoir at 2 Tecumseth Street, should the abattoir reinstate operations.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69885.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (June 30, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Rental Housing (TE33.6b)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71569.pdf) Report Item TE33.6 deferred at City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72981.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| David Kendall (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (June 12, 2014) E-mail from Rosalie Lam (TE.Supp.TE33.6.1)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Patrisha Robertson, Niagara Neighbourhood Now Residents' Committee (TE.Supp.TE33.6.2) (June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Biggar (TE.Supp.TE33.6.3) (June 17, 2014) Submission from David Kendall (TE.Supp.TE33.6.4) |
| 6a | Supplementary Report - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Rental Housing |
| Origin |
| (June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report provides additional information regarding rental housing further to the Final Report dated May 26, 2014, for the proposed rezoning at 89-109 Niagara Street. The Final Report recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and recommends that the owner enter into a Section 37 Agreement under the Planning Act to secure community benefits including the provision of 21 rental housing units.
The rezoning application proposes the redevelopment of the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed-use development which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings facing Niagara Street, commonly referred to as the "coffin factory", and the addition of two residential towers 12 and 14 stories in height connected by a five-storey podium. The proposed uses include six ground floor commercial/office units and 367 residential dwellings, all of which permit live-work units.
This report provides further detail on the agreement reached with the owner to provide the rental housing units, and recommends revisions to the draft zoning by-law attached with the Final Report dated May 26, 2014, to secure the rental housing through a Section 37 Agreement under the Planning Act. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report - Rental Housing
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70509.pdf) |
| (Deferred by City Council from July 8, 2014 - 2014.TE33.12) |
| TE33.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Final Report - 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report |
| Bill 1008 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated August 3, 2006 between the City and the original owner of the property as contemplated in the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to site specific By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. In addition, any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements. Council directed that in the reallocation, consideration be given to current community needs and to co-ordination of these community benefits with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area. Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.
This report recommends approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment providing for the reallocation as described above. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70014.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Report Item TE33.12 deferred at City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72982.pdf) |
| Executive Committee - Meeting 44 |
| EX44.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Delegation of Authority during the 2014 Council Election Recess |
| Communication EX44.1.1 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, in addition to the authority currently delegated by Chapter 71, Financial Control, temporarily delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to approve any reallocation of budget between capital projects in an amount of not more than $3 million during the 2014 Election recess from September to December, 2014.
2. City Council, in addition to the authority currently delegated by Chapter 71, Financial Control, temporarily delegate authority to the City Manager, or his delegate, to approve any over-expenditures of a commitment in an amount not to exceed $1 million during the 2014 Election recess from September to December, 2014, provided that City Council has:
a. provided funds in the operating or capital budget for that purpose or donated funds are provided pursuant to Chapter 71, Financial Control; or
b. approved the project and the funding thereof; and
c. sufficient funds remain in the project or program.
3. City Council direct the City Manager, or his delegate, to report to:
a. the Budget Committee in early 2015 on any exercise of the delegated authority for approving reallocation of budget between capital projects in accordance with Recommendation 1 above; and
b. the Government Management Committee in early 2015 on any exercise of the delegated authority for approving over-expenditures in accordance with Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council delegate authority to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors (TAF Board) to approve on behalf of City Council, for the period commencing on the day following the last City Council meeting of this term up to the first regular meeting of Council following the 2014 municipal election, transactions described in Subsections 11(8) and (9) of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Act that satisfy the following conditions:
a. the proposed transaction is of a type, and for an amount, which is set out in a line item in a Toronto Atmospheric Fund budget approved by City Council; or
b. the proposed transaction is an investment permitted to be made by Toronto Atmospheric Fund, as set out in Toronto Atmospheric Fund’s Statement of Investment Objectives and Principles approved by City Council as amended; or
c. the proposed investment is specifically permitted by a provision of the Relationship Framework, 2013 between Toronto Atmospheric Fund and the City, as amended.
5. City Council require that any approval for transactions by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors pursuant to this delegated authority be disclosed in the Board's 2014 Audited Annual Financial Statements, no later than June 2015.
6. City Council approve the commitments set out in Schedule A to the report (July 24, 2014) from the City Manager that have commitments that extend beyond the current term of Council as required in the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Act and as requested in the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board report dated July 15, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary |
In order to ensure that the City’s approved operating and capital activities can continue to move forward while Standing Committees and Council are in recess, it is recommended that during the 2014 election recess when Standing Committees and Council do not have any regularly scheduled meetings, the following delegated authorities are recommended, provided sufficient funds are available in the approved project or program total budget:
a. Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to approve any reallocation of budget between capital projects in an amount of not more than $3 million;
b. City Manager, or his delegate, to approve over-expenditures of contracts up to a maximum of $1,000,000; and
c. Board of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) to give prior approval, on behalf of Council, to enter commitments that extend beyond the current term of Council, limited to a time period prior to and immediately following municipal elections when Council is not in session. Approval for these commitments is prescribed by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Act, 2005, S.O. Ontario, 2005 c. PR6 (TAF Act). TAF further requests Council's approval of its commitments listed in Schedule A.
The delegated authorities will end after the 2014 election recess. Any exercise of the delegated authority for capital reallocations and over-expenditure of contracts will be reported to Budget Committee and Government Management Committee respectively, in 2015.
For the delegated authorities described in this report related to capital reallocation and over-expenditure of contracts, these delegated authorities will override the provisions in the Financial Control By-law and these two delegations of authorities will only operate during the 2014 election recess. The Financial Control By-law will not be amended as a result and the remaining provisions of the Financial Control By-law will otherwise apply. The Financial Control By-law is being reviewed in its entirety in 2015 and staff will be reporting on any changes required for the Financial Control By-law, including any further delegated authority during all election recesses moving forward at that time. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Schedule A from the City Manager on Delegation of Authority during the 2014 Council Election Recess
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72584.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.New.EX44.1.1)
|
| EX44.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' Staff |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' Staff as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Clerk.
2. City Council authorize that the City Clerk update Members' staff contracts effective December 1, 2014 to reflect the approved Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' Staff. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Clerk |
| Summary |
This report is in response to City Council's direction to develop a consolidated policy that sets out the roles, responsibilities and authorities of elected officials for human resources management and the ethical framework for their staff, including the application of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council to Members' staff.
The proposed Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' staff is consistent with the Toronto Public Service By-law report that was unanimously approved by Council in June 2014, tailored to reflect the unique nature of Members' staff. The proposed Framework is included as Attachment 1 in the report. The approved Framework will be incorporated into Members' staff contracts beginning the new term of Council. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' Staff
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72503.pdf) Attachment 1 - Human Resources Management and Ethical Framework for Members' Staff (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72504.pdf) |
| EX44.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place |
| The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX44.3b with recommendations) Bill 958 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the approximately 1.4 acre shown on the sketch attached as Appendix A (the "Leased Lands") to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager, from the notification requirements set out in Item MM52.17 adopted by City Council at its meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014.
2. The Letter of Intent ("LOI") in Appendix A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager be amended to reflect the following new business terms:
a. Baseball Diamond to be converted to temporary parking at Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE) cost;
b. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE) deliver $1 million to City to be held and used to fund the re-conversion of the temporary parking to functional green space on the Baseball Diamond site; re-conversion to occur when “new parking facility” is established;
c. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE) to fund a grounds-wide parking study up to $200,000;
d. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE) to contribute $2.0 million (less the $200,000), matched by the City, towards creation of “new parking facility” on grounds within a defined time horizon based on findings of parking study; and
e. No alternative replacement green space required north of Medieval Times
3. City Council declare the Leased Lands surplus and approve the City and the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place entering into a lease agreement with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited for use of the Leased Lands for the construction and operation of a basketball training facility, substantially on the terms and conditions of the Letter of Intent ("LOI") contained in Appendix A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager, as amended by Recommendation 2 above, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Board's Chief Executive Officer, the City's Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize and direct staff to take all steps necessary with respect to the Leased Lands to comply with the City’s real estate disposal process set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
5. City Council pass a by-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:
a. enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE) in respect of the portions of the high-performance basketball training centre ("Basketball Training Facility") within the Leased Lands that will be used as an eligible municipal capital facility for cultural, recreational and tourist purposes as a result of public use for the majority of the operating hours of the facility, when such portions can be determined ("the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility");
b. exempt the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility from property taxation for municipal and school purposes, which tax exemption is to be effective from the later of the following dates: the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed, the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted, or the commencement date of the Lease with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited (MLSE); and
c. the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility from development charges if such charges would otherwise be exigible.
6. Council declare the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility to be for the purposes of the City and for public use.
7. City Council authorize the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law when enacted pursuant to the requirements of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
|
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee requested the City Manager:
1. to report directly to City Council August 25, 2014, on the revised Letter of Intent for Council consideration, and incorporate in the report, accommodation to enhance the relationship between Toronto Colleges and Universities and Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Limited for youth basketball opportunities in Toronto.
2. to submit to City Council on August 25, 2014 an Economic Impact Assessment report. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary |
This report seeks Council's approval for the long-term lease of a land parcel at the west end of the Exhibition Place grounds to Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. ("MLSE") for the construction and operation of a 68,000 sq. ft. high-performance basketball development and training centre and to declare the subject lands surplus to City requirements. This training centre will include two indoor basketball courts along with a range of ancillary areas.
Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. has committed, as part of the proposed lease agreement, to making the majority of the daytime and evening basketball court time available for community use. The majority of the remaining time will be used for the training of the Toronto Raptor National Basketball League team. Parks staff have indicated that the availability of these basketball courts for community use will address a shortage of premium indoor basketball space in the south downtown.
Staff have also determined that the proposed level of community usage will make the portion of the centre that is open to the public eligible for a property tax and development charge exemption if the facility is designated as a Municipal Capital Facility. This report recommends that Council direct staff to enter into a Municipal Capital Facility agreement with MLSE for the proposed facility.
The proposed land lease will result in an annual rental payment of $205,000, with periodic adjustments for inflation, to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place. The financial terms for the proposed lease have been determined through an independent appraisal carried out for the City by Altus Group Limited and have also been reviewed by the City's Real Estate staff.
This report recommends approval of the attached Letter of Intent ("LOI") between the City, the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place and Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. because the proposal will achieve the following City objectives: - Extensive public access to a premium grade indoor basketball facility; - Substantial fiscal benefit to Exhibition Place as a result of the ground rent that will be paid by MLSE; and - Consistent with the goals set out in the Exhibition Place 2014-2016 Strategic Plan. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72768.pdf) Appendix A - Proposed Letter of Intent from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place and the City of Toronto (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72809.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 25, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Staff Responses to Executive Committee Directions Regarding EX44.3 (Proposed Basketball Training Centre) (EX44.3b)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73092.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Tim Leiweke, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Wayne Parrish, President/CEO, Canada Basketball addressed to Tim Leiweke, President and CEO Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment, forwarded by Tim Leiweke (EX.New.EX44.3.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49502.pdf) (August 19, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes (EX.Supp.EX44.3.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49494.pdf) (August 19, 2014) Letter from R. Bobak (EX.Supp.EX44.3.3) |
| 3a | Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place |
| Origin |
| (August 15, 2014) Letter from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place |
| Summary |
This is to advise that the Board of Governor of Exhibition Place at its meeting of August 14, 2014 adopted the following motions with respect to the Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place.
1. Request that City Council declare the Leased Lands surplus and approve the City and the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place entering into a lease agreement with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. for use of the Leased Lands for the construction and operation of a basketball training facility, substantially on the terms and conditions of the Letter of Intent ("LOI") contained in Appendix “A” of City Executive Report EX44.3 and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Board's Chief Executive Officer, the City's Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor.
2. Request that City Council exempt the approximately 1.4 acre shown on the sketch attached as Appendix "B" (the "Leased Lands") of City Executive Report No. EX44.3 from the notification requirements set out in Item MM52.17 adopted by City Council at its meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014.
3. Support City Council authorizing and directing City staff to take all steps necessary with respect to the Leased Lands to comply with the City’s real estate disposal process set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code:
a. City Council pass a by-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to: enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. in respect of the portions of the high-performance basketball training centre ("Basketball Training Facility") within the Leased Lands that will be used as an eligible municipal capital facility for cultural, recreational and tourist purposes as a result of public use for the majority of the operating hours of the facility, when such portions can be determined ("the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility");
b. exempt the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility from property taxation for municipal and school purposes, which tax exemption is to be effective from the later of the following dates: the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed, the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted, or the commencement date of the Lease with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd.; and
c. exempt the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility from development charges if such charges would otherwise be exigible.
4. Support Council declaring the Municipal Capital Facility Portion of the Facility to be for the purposes of the City and for public use.
5. Request City Council to authorize the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law when enacted pursuant to the requirements of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
6. The Letter of Intent with Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. contained in Appendix “A” of City Executive Report EX44.3 be subject to a site plan review which aims to develop a plan to protect approximately the same amount of green space and parking. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 15, 2014) Letter from the Chief Executive Officer,
Exhibition Place on Proposed Basketball Training Centre at Exhibition Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72891.pdf) |
| EX44.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| A Co-ordinated Planning Approach for Ontario Place and Exhibition Place |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council communicate to the Province the City's support for the revitalization of Ontario Place as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager, subject to the establishment of a joint and coordinated planning process, per Recommendation 2 below.
2. City Council authorize the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to work with the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport on a joint planning process and public consultation for the revitalization of Ontario Place, which includes City objectives for the development of the central waterfront, and the Exhibition Place strategic plan.
3. City Council request the City Manager to report in the new term of Council with more specific information on the scope of a joint planning process and public consultation, and to seek additional Council authorities, as required. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary |
This report provides an update on the work being done by City and provincial staff on a co-ordinated approach to revitalizing Ontario Place and Exhibition Place.
The provincial vision for Ontario Place was outlined in an announcement from the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport on July 31, 2014 and is enclosed as Attachment 1 to this report for Council's information. The Province has announced a long term vision to revitalize Ontario Place as an all-season waterfront destination including a large, accessible green space and a variety of recreational and cultural activities, but has no plans for residential development. This plan was developed over the past year and complements the City's planning and economic development objectives for the central waterfront and the Exhibition Place strategic plan.
To ensure consideration of the City's interests during the provincial decision-making process and to make progress on Council's 2013 direction to take a co-ordinated approach, a City/Province staff group has been working together over the past several months. This report seeks Council authority for the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to work with the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport on a joint planning process and public consultation for the revitalization of Ontario Place and Exhibition Place.
A collaborative process would support the achievement of outcomes of mutual interest to the City and the Province, including new viable cultural attractions that would benefit Toronto and Ontario residents, and spur increased tourism and economic growth for the region. Over the longer term, areas of shared interest and potentially shared investment include aligning with the City's long term transportation plan for future waterfront west transit expansion, improving north-south connection, undertaking improvements to water, road and public realm infrastructure, and the potential for the City to take responsibility for programming and maintenance of contiguous park land.
This report recommends that City Council request the City Manager to report back with more specific information on the joint planning process and public consultation and to seek further Council direction, as required. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager on A Co-ordinated Planning Approach for Ontario Place and Exhibition Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72751.pdf) (July 31, 2014) Attachment 1 - Announcement from Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72752.pdf) Attachment 2 - Diagram - Ontario Place Site Illustration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72753.pdf) |
| EX44.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Casa Loma Corporation Board Composition |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, as the sole shareholder of the Casa Loma Corporation, amend the Board composition to delete the position of Executive Director, Culture and replace it with the position of Director, Museums and Heritage Services.
2. City Council require the Casa Loma Corporation Board to amend Section 4.1 d) of By-law No. 1 of the Casa Loma Corporation to delete reference to the "Executive Director, Culture or her designate" and replace it with the "Director, Museums of Heritage Services or their designate". |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary |
The Casa Loma Corporation (CLC) Board is composed of senior City staff and the Chief Executive Officer of Exhibition Place. Due to a recent reorganization in the City's Economic Development and Culture Division it is necessary to make a technical amendment to the Board composition to accurately reflect the titles of the City staff positions on the Casa Loma Corporation Board. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Casa Loma Corporation Board Composition
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72539.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Attachment 1 - Report from the Casa Loma Corporation Board (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72540.pdf) |
| EX44.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Toronto Community Housing Corporation Amended Shareholder Direction - Toronto Community Housing Corporation Approval of Council Direction |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council treat the part of the Council meeting when this report is considered as a special meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCH) and confirm the amended and restated By-law No. 2 approved by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors at its meeting of August 14, 2014 in the form attached in Appendix 2a to the report (August 15, 2014) from the City Manager. |
| Origin |
| (August 15, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary |
City Council at its November 13, 2013 meeting approved an Amended and Restated Shareholder Direction for Toronto Community Housing Corporation ("TCH") and requested that the TCH Board of Directors approve Council’s direction by amending its By-law No. 2 to bring it into conformity with the updated Shareholder Direction, and submit the amended By-law to City Council for approval.
As requested by Council, this report transmits the amended TCH By-law No. 2 considered by the TCH Board of Directors at their August 14, 2014 meeting. The Board approved the proposed amended and restated By-law No. 2 as presented.
As required under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) and the TCH Shareholder Direction, this report recommends that the City as the shareholder confirm the amended and restated By-law No. 2.
In addition, this report provides a brief update on the City's support to the TCH Executive Leadership Team during the transition period until a new permanent President and CEO is appointed. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 15, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Community Housing Amended Shareholder Direction - Toronto Community Housing Approval of Council Direction
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72867.pdf) (August 14, 2014) Attachment 1 - Transmittal letter from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, - Revisions to By-law No. 2. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72868.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Attachment 2 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation Report and Report Attachments 1, 2A and 2B on Revisions to By-law No. 2 considered by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors on August 14, 2014. (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72889.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Community Housing Corporation Amended Shareholder Direction - Toronto Community Housing Corporation Approval of Council Direction - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72736.pdf) |
| EX44.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| 2013 Annual Human Rights Office Report and Amendments to the Accommodation Policy |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the revised Accommodation Policy in Appendix 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Summary | ||||||||||
This report provides information on harassment and discrimination complaints filed by employees and service recipients of the City of Toronto to the City's Human Rights Office (HRO); the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO); and through the City's grievance/arbitration process in 2013. The report discusses complaint trends and identifies practices adopted by the Human Rights Office to minimize legislative breaches, penalties and risks to the City.
The City's internal human rights and equity approach has again resulted in the City incurring no penalties in 2013, from the provincial bodies charged with hearing harassment and discrimination complaints, i.e., the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, Arbitration, the Ministry of Labour, the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
Table 1 – Harassment and/or Discrimination Enquiries/Complaints in 2013
The most often cited grounds of complaints raised to the Human Rights Office, similar to previous years' complaint patterns, were: workplace harassment, disability, race and sex (Table 3). City employees filed 101 discrimination grievances in 2013 and the most often cited grounds were workplace harassment and disability (Table 5). Complaint trends in the 35 applications filed by service recipients and employees to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario were similar to previous years: disability, race and sex related grounds were cited most often (Table 7).
As an integrated Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Division, the Human Rights Office’s objective is to advance equity and foster inclusion by enhancing the reach and application of the City's existing policies and legislative obligations. The Human Rights Office does this in two ways: by balancing its innovative and proactive initiatives to promote equity with its complaint management function; and by promoting protections to both employees and service recipients, particularly those deemed vulnerable.
In this capacity, the Human Rights Office has amended the City's Accommodation Policy (previously the "Employment Accommodation Policy"). The duty to accommodate is a legal obligation that requires employers and service providers to address disadvantage experienced by individuals and/or groups protected under the Ontario Human Rights Code. Examples of employee and/or service recipient accommodations include modifying facilities to facilitate accessibility for people with mobility disabilities, rescheduling meetings on high holy days to foster participation of individuals whose creed requires them to refrain from work, etc.
The amended policy clarifies that the City's duty to accommodate extends to recipients of municipal services in addition to employees. Policy revisions enhance the City's commitment to promote greater inclusiveness and improved accessibility, in part by emphasizing the importance of viewing accommodation through a systemic lens and by highlighting the City's legislative obligation to comply with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. | ||||||||||
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager on 2013 Annual Human Rights Office Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72722.pdf) Appendix 1 - City of Toronto Accommodation Policy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72723.pdf) |
| EX44.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Executive Compensation Policy at City Agencies and Corporations |
| Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request City agency and corporation Boards to develop a comprehensive senior executive compensation policy, independent of management, applying the guiding principles and practices set out in Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager and the City Solicitor.
2. City Council require City agency and corporation Boards to approve a senior executive compensation policy by April 1, 2015 (excluding restricted Boards), and forward it to the City Manager for report to City Council, through the Executive Committee, for consideration; and in the interim period prior to the approval of a policy be requested to adhere, where possible, to the principles in Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager and the City Solicitor, including the capping of variable, incentive, and/or merit pay to 25 percent of base salary.
3. City Council request City agency and corporation Board approved executive compensation policies be applied to new employment contracts, and to existing contracts, if any, that permit compensation adjustments, either during an existing term or under renewal.
4. City Council direct City agency and corporation Boards to review their executive compensation policy every four years after the initial policy is approved (excluding restricted Boards), with results to be disclosed on public websites and annual reports, and authorize the City Manager to incorporate this requirement and the guiding principles and practices per Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager and the City Solicitor, into existing and future Relationship Frameworks, Shareholder Declarations and Directions.
5. City Council direct the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources to provide guidance and assistance to City agencies as required in the development of executive compensation policies.
6. City Council require all City agency and corporation Boards to ensure that future employment contracts for senior executives contain a provision providing employee consent to the disclosure of their individual compensation through an annual public report through the Board; and request that existing senior executives of those bodies provide similar consent.
7. City Council receive Confidential Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Manager and the City Solicitor for information, and direct that their content be kept confidential in their entirety after the consideration of the report by Council for reasons of personal information about identified individuals and solicitor-client privilege. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council request Boards of City agencies and corporations to develop a senior executive compensation policy, adhering to the guiding principles outlined in Attachment 1 to this report. Attachment 1 includes requirements to set a base salary range using a relative comparator analysis, places a 25 percent limit on variable, incentive, and/or merit pay, limits employer pension contributions to 1.0 time the employee contribution, and requires a review of senior executive benefits.
The policy would apply to new senior executive employment contracts and to existing contracts, if any, which permit compensation adjustments, either during an existing term or under renewal. However, this report does not establish specific compensation levels or programs to be applied by City Boards, as the City of Toronto is not the employer of City agency and corporation staff. Confidential Attachment 3 to this report outlines various legal issues that should be considered in the context of the recommendations contained in this report.
This report recommends that City Boards approve senior executive compensation policies by April 1, 2015, if not already established, with a review every four years. It is recommended that restricted agency Boards (Toronto Police Services Board and Toronto Public Library Board) be requested to review their executive compensation policies in the spirit and intent of what is being recommended.
The senior executive compensation policy review does not apply to City agencies and corporations where the employees are City employees (including, Association of Community Centres (AOCCs) and Public Health) given that City policies apply.
The objective of this report is to ensure that senior executive compensation policies at City agencies and corporations are set within a framework that is fair, transparent, and accountable, and complements similar practices across the broader City of Toronto public service. The policy framework proposed in this report maintains the right of the agency or corporation Board as the employer to set the details of its compensation strategy while adhering to the key principles to ensure more transparency and accountability in setting executive compensation. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor on Executive Compensation Policy at City Agencies and Corporations
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72764.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Attachment 1 - Guiding Principles in the Development of Senior Executive Compensation Policies (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72765.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Confidential Attachment 2 - Comparator Analysis and 2012 Senior Executive Compensation (August 6, 2014) Confidential Attachment 3 - Report from the City Solicitor |
| EX44.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Occupational Health and Safety Report - First Quarter 2014 |
| The Employee and Labour Relations Committee has submitted a Transmittal on this Item (EX44.9a) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the First Quarter 2014 Occupational Health and Safety Report. |
| Origin |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources |
| Summary |
This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities and performance during the first quarter of 2014.
There was a 26.7 percent increase in the number of lost time injuries (LTIs) during the first quarter of 2014 relative to the first quarter of 2013 and there was double the number of recurrence injuries from 19 to 39. This significant increase in injury experience reflects the severe winter weather conditions. There was a 153 percent increase in falls due to icy conditions and half of the critical injuries were fractures as a result of slips and falls on the ice. Increases in overall injuries, including musculoskeletal disorders, were most notable in operating divisions whose activities were impacted by the effects of the storm and continued freezing temperatures.
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board invoiced costs for the first quarter of 2014 were approximately $5.85 million, $1.03 million lower than in the first quarter of 2013. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in Firefighter cancer claims. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report - First Quarter 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72198.pdf) Appendix A - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Incidents Data, by Division (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72199.pdf) Appendix B - Lost Time Injury Frequency (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72200.pdf) Appendix C - Summary of Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Costs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72201.pdf) Appendix D (i) - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Invoiced Costs <$50,000 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72202.pdf) Appendix D (ii) - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board Invoiced Costs >$50,000 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72203.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Transmitall from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee (EX44.9a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73055.pdf) |
| EX44.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| A Consolidated Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service Communications Centre |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 in order to remove the requirement that staff working in a consolidated Toronto Fire Service and Toronto Emergency Medical Services communications centre are required to be firefighters.
2. City Council request the City Manager, in collaboration with the Chief, Toronto Emergency Medical Services, to consult with the Province of Ontario, in particular the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, to confirm that the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care will continue to provide required current and future funding levels including support for information technology.
3. City Council request the Association of Municipalities (AMO) to support the legislative amendments to the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 and confirmation that current and future funding levels will be maintained by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care as outlined in Recommendations 1 and 2 above.
4. City Council request the City Manager and Executive Director, Human Resources to pursue amendments to the collective agreement with Toronto Professional Firefighters Association (TPFFA), Local 3888 to permit the work in a consolidated Toronto Fire Service and Toronto Emergency Medical Service communications centre to be performed by City employees who are not firefighters.
5. City Council request the City Manager to bring forward an implementation plan in 2015 including required investments and projected savings for a consolidated communications centre. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B |
| Summary |
Following the 2013 service efficiency study that reviewed Toronto Emergency Medical Service (TEMS) and Toronto Fire Service (TFS), the City Manager and Deputy City Managers, in consultation with the Chiefs of Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service undertook further evaluation of a consolidated communications centre for the two services.
The conclusion is that consolidation can achieve cost savings while maintaining or improving dispatch, only if the necessary conditions are in place to move forward with this service delivery model. These conditions include required legislative and collective agreement amendments to allow employees in a consolidated communications centre to include City employees who are not firefighters. As well, given that the Toronto Emergency Medical Service Communications Centre is 100 percent funded by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), confirmation that the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care will continue current and future funding in a consolidated delivery model, including for information technology support, is also required before moving forward with implementation.
Legislative and collective agreement amendments, and confirmation of continued current and future funding, are necessary conditions to move forward with a consolidated Toronto Emergency Medical Service and TFS communications centre to ensure that it will achieve cost savings and maintain or improve service excellence based on current benchmarks. As a result, this report therefore recommends that City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 to remove the requirement that communications staff be firefighters and authorize the City Manager and Executive Director of Human Resources to pursue collective agreement amendments as first steps towards a Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service consolidated communications centre.
This report also recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager, in collaboration with the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Service, to consult with the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care for confirmation that they will continue to provide the necessary current and future funding in a consolidated model, including support for information technology. Lastly, this report recommends that City Council request that the Association of Municipalities (AMO) support the required legislative changes to the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 and confirmation that current and future Provincial funding levels will be maintained in a consolidated communications centre model.
The City Manager and Deputy City Managers, in consultation with the Chiefs of Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service, will bring forward a more detailed implementation plan in 2015, including required investments and projected savings when the necessary conditions are in place.
Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service leverage resources, skills, and knowledge across a range of operational, administrative and technological areas and will continue to maximize resources through efficiencies and cooperative arrangements now and into the future. Given the service objectives of enhanced collaboration between Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service, the City Manager will consolidate reporting of Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service under one Deputy City Manager to further enhance coordination and efficiency of service between these two divisions. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report and Appendices A, B, and C from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on A Consolidated Toronto Emergency Medical Service and Toronto Fire Service Communications Centre
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72745.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) (EX.New.EX.44.10.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49519.pdf) |
| EX44.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| 2015 Pan Am Games Community Projects Initiative |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council distribute the $1.760 million earmarked for the Pan Am Community Projects initiative in 2015 through three grant streams, and authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to implement the application process for each grant stream and report on recommended allocations in early 2015:
a. $0.560 million for a “Local Animation Through Collaboration” grant stream to support Games-inspired activities and projects in all parts of Toronto;
b. $0.885 million for a “Community Legacy Initiatives” grant stream to support projects which profile and provide longer-term economic and/or social infrastructure benefits for Toronto’s Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities; and
c. $0.315 million for a “Pan Am Path Arts Animation” grant stream to provide matching seed funding for up to 21 organizations to deliver cultural activities and projects along the route of the Path in neighbourhoods across Toronto. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from Deputy City Manager, Cluster A |
| Summary |
In July 2013 City Council endorsed an investment of up to $20 million in a 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program (“Showcase Program”) to enhance the experience of the TORONTO 2015 Games for participants and residents, and to advance the City’s economic development and tourism, sport development and healthy living, and resident engagement and cultural celebration goals. Final approval and funding for the Showcase Program was confirmed through Council’s adoption of the 2014 Operating and Capital Budgets.
As part of the Showcase Program, City Council earmarked $1.76 million for a Pan Am Community Projects initiative to support community based Games related or inspired activations and projects. At its meeting of July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 City Council directed the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to report back to the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee on the distribution of the $1.76 million for this initiative, with due regard to any advice offered by the Mayor's Pan Am / Parapan Am Games Reference Group or other community perspectives.
Responding to this directive and reflecting advice received from the Mayor’s Pan Am / Parapan Am Games Reference Group, this report recommends that Council distribute the $1.76 million through three complementary grant streams and authorize the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration to implement application processes for each grant stream and report on recommended allocations in early 2015. Funding in the amounts indicated below is recommended to be set aside for each grant stream:
- $0.560 million to support Games-inspired activities and projects in all parts of Toronto;
- $0.885 million to support projects which profile or provide longer-term economic and/or social infrastructure benefits for Toronto’s Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities; and
- $0.315 million to support arts and cultural animation along the Pan Am Path. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on 2015 Pan Am Games Community Projects Initiative
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72559.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Rosalyn J. Morrison (EX.New.EX44.11.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49507.pdf) |
| 11a | 2015 Pan Am Games Community Projects Initiative |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mayor Ford |
| Summary |
It is my pleasure to share with you the following report prepared by the Mayor's Pan/Parapan Am Games Reference Group.
Established at City Council's request, the Reference Group was tasked with providing advice to me, in my role as the head of Toronto City Council, on how to improve Games related outreach and engagement with Toronto's diverse South American, Latin American and Caribbean communities. In addition, and by extension, the Reference Group offers guidance to the City of Toronto and other Games partners on how to better plan and deliver the Games and ensure they provide a legacy of strong social and economic benefits for our City's residents and businesses.
Co-chaired by Councillor Cesar Palacio and Councillor Mark Grimes, the Reference Group is comprised of more than a dozen outstanding individuals who are committed to the success of our great city and the TORONTO 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games.
I am pleased to note that a report from the Deputy City Manager to be considered by the Executive Committee at its meeting on August 20, 2014 directly and appropriately addresses the Reference Group's first suggestion by recommending that $0.885 million of the $1.760 million which has already been approved and budgeted by City Council for the Pan Am Community Projects initiative be reserved for a "Community Legacy Initiatives" grant stream to fund projects which showcase and offer longer-term economic and/or social infrastructure benefits for Toronto's Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities.
If this recommendation is adopted by City Council, it is anticipated that the City of Toronto will invest at least $1.0 million of the $1.760 million in projects which celebrate and support Toronto's many Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities through (i) the core investment of $0.885 million in 4 or 5 larger scale legacy projects funded through the "Community Legacy Initiatives" grant stream, and (ii) more than $115,000 for smaller projects supported by the other two grant streams recommended by the Deputy City Manager to distribute the remaining funds which Council has already earmarked for community projects. Please join me in supporting the Deputy City Manager's recommendation.
With regard to the Reference Group's second suggestion, I am requesting that other Games partners and City staff responsible for Games planning and delivery reassess -- with the benefit of the Reference Group's advice -- whether enough is being done to market and promote the Games through community resources, including ethnic media, which reach and are accessible to Toronto's various Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities and neighbourhoods. Each Games partner needs to make sure that the public funds which it has already committed to support Games planning and delivery -- including funds for marketing -- are being spent efficiently. Complex initiatives like the Pan Am Games require both general and niche marketing in order to ensure that all communities are made aware of and feel connected to the event.
Please join me in thanking Councillor Palacio, Councillor Grimes and all members of the Reference Group for their sound advice, their service to our city, and their commitment to helping make the TORONTO 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games the best Games ever. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mayor Ford on 2015 Pan Am Games Community Projects Initiative
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72743.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Final Report and Recommendations of the Mayor?s Pan Am / Parapan Am Games Reference Group (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72744.pdf) |
| EX44.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Project Management Contract Award for the Proposed Redevelopment of Seaton House and Revitalization of George Street |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to negotiate and enter into agreements for project management consultant services for the redevelopment of Seaton House and revitalization of George Street with PRISM Partners Incorporated being the highest scoring Proponent and meeting the requirements of Request for Proposal 9155-14-7072 for the total price fixed fee of $3,418,000 (net of all taxes and charges) subject to the following conditions:
a. that the agreement for the scope of the work for Project Stage One not exceed a value of $618,000 (net of all taxes and charges);
b. that the necessary budget allocations for Project Stage One, included in a separate report "Capital Variance Report for the Five Month Period Ending May 31, 2014" are approved by Council;
c. that the agreement for the scope of the work for Project Stage Two at a value of $2,800,000 (net of all taxes and charges) be executed subject to City Council approval of the entire project when staff report back to City Council, through Executive Committee, in the third quarter of 2015 on the project's feasibility, costs and subject to sufficient funding in place in the 2015 capital budget and the 10-year capital plan for the entire project; and
d. that the agreements are based on terms and conditions set out in the Request for Proposal, any addenda and on any other terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to advise Council on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) 9155-14-7072 for Project Management Consulting Services for the proposed redevelopment of Seaton House and revitalization of George Street and request the authority to enter in to an agreement with the recommended Proponent PRISM Partners Inc. This report also requests authority to enter into a contract, separated into two distinct project stages, with PRISM Partners Inc. for $3,418,000 (net of all taxes and charges) to be awarded subject to the necessary budget reallocations in 2014 and Council approval of the entire project in 2015.
The City requires project management services to develop a detailed plan that completes the feasibility analysis, oversees the preparation of architectural drawings and prepares the full costing estimates of the revitalization project. The project manager will oversee the completion of the design component needed for the redevelopment which is envisioned as a multi-purpose facility that will provide emergency shelter, long-term care, community services and affordable housing. This information will help develop the report due in mid-2015 that will advise Council of the status and financing plans of the redevelopment initiative.
In the 2015 report, staff will report to Council on the project's feasibility, costs, financing strategies and recommendations regarding the execution of the second agreement for project management services. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
on Project Management Contract Award for the Proposed Redevelopment of Seaton House and Revitalization of George Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72601.pdf) |
| EX44.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:29 |
| Evergreen Brick Works - Proposed Capital Loan Guarantee Amendment |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, subject to obtaining the consent of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (the "TRCA"), grant authority for the City, in conjunction with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, to:
1. Consent to and acknowledge an amendment to the terms of the RBC Loan to extend the RBC Loan to June 30, 2023 subject to the following conditions:
a. reducing the $500,000 Cash Funds (the "City-Held Funds") provided by Evergreen to the City as security under the Lease Agreement by $200,000 the first year and then $100,000 per year for the following three years, and to apply the City Held Funds to the RBC Loan in accordance with Columns I and II of Schedule A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and
b. requiring Evergreen to make annual principal payments on the RBC Loan in accordance with the schedule set out in Column III of Schedule A, so that together with payments made by the City of the City Held Funds, the maximum outstanding balance on the RBC Loan at the end of each calendar year shall not exceed the amount shown in Column IV of Schedule A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. If Evergreen is unable to reach agreement with RBC on an amendment to the RBC Loan on the terms set out in Recommendation 1.1 above, to consent to Evergreen negotiating a new loan with another lender to replace the RBC Loan (the "Replacement Loan") on the terms set out in Recommendation 1.1 above.
3. To amend the joint and several guarantee in respect of the Project, or provide a new joint and several guarantee to a new lender if Evergreen negotiates a Replacement Loan (the "Guarantee"), on the following terms:
a. extending the term of the Guarantee by 7 years, from its current expiration on June 30, 2016 to expiration on the earlier of June 30, 2023 or the earlier date of termination or payout of the RBC Loan or the Replacement Loan; and
b. reducing the amount of the Guarantee in each calendar year to the amount shown in Column II of Schedule B to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. City Council grant authority for the City to enter into any Project-related agreements and amending agreements, including without limitation loan-related documents, guarantees, leases, consents, acknowledgements and agreements or ancillary documents between any or all of the following, the City, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Evergreen and RBC, or another Lender, and any such other parties as may be required, which, in the opinion of the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, may be required, desirable or necessary to give effect to the above recommendations.
3. City Council request Evergreen Brick Works to report to the Executive Committee on their fundraising activities on an annual basis and be encouraged to enhance onsite promotion to visitors of donation opportunities. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
Evergreen, a registered charity, has transformed the City's property at the Don Valley Brick Works into Canada's first large-scale community environmental centre (the "Project"). To date, Evergreen has raised all but $4.8 million of the $55 million in capital required for the restoration and adaptive re-use of the property. Environmental and urban ecology programming together with the farmer's market, event and community uses has resulted in attendance figures exceeding 400,000 annually. City support is a nominal rent lease and a $7.5 million loan guarantee provided jointly and severally by the City and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority of a capital loan provided by RBC (the "RBC Loan"), of which the balance is $4.8 million.
Evergreen has advised that it will not be able to meet covenants requiring the loan balance to be reduced to $1 million by December 31, 2014, and to be extinguished by June 30, 2016, due to slower than anticipated capital fundraising revenues for this Project. Evergreen proposes instead to repay the loan through operating revenues rather than from fundraising, which requires an extension of the loan guarantee term to 2023, and to apply $500,000 held by the City as security under the lease to the RBC Loan to help accelerate payment. Staff recommend consenting to this extension and amendment of the RBC Loan and to extension of the capital loan guarantee, subject to Evergreen meeting loan balance reduction targets as set out in this report. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report and Schedule A and B from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72582.pdf) |
| EX44.15 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| City Consent to a First Mortgage by Toronto Artscape Inc. against the Community Performance Space at 21 - 31 Widmer Street |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the business terms contained in Appendix A to the report (July 31, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture be amended by adding the following to Condition 1:
"and to be reduced by $500,000 upon receipt of the $500,000 Section 37 contribution related to the development at 388 King Street West and 82 Peter Street".
2. City Council provide its consent to Artscape registering a first mortgage on the Property in the principal amount of $800,000.00 to be registered in priority to any City interest, which consent would be conditional upon the terms and conditions set out in Appendix A of the report (July 31, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as amended by Recommendation 1 above, and on such other terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
3. City Council grant authority for any agreements as may, in the opinion of the City Solicitor, be required to give effect thereto, all in a form acceptable to her. |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend that the City consent to the request by Toronto Artscape Inc. ("Artscape") to register an $800,000.00 first mortgage in priority to the City's interest in order to finance the fit-up at a community performance space of approximately 420 square meters located at 21-31 Widmer Street (the "Property). This consent is conditional on Artscape executing an Option Agreement in favour of the City to be registered on title to the Property immediately behind the first mortgage, which Option Agreement provides for the City to acquire and repurpose the performance space in the event of default by Artscape under the proposed mortgage. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on City Consent to a First Mortgage by Toronto Artscape Inc. against the Community Performance Space at 21 - 31 Widmer Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72646.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Tim Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer, Artscape |
| EX44.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Update on the Toronto Social Procurement Framework |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (July 30, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the Treasurer, for information. |
| Origin |
| (July 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the Treasurer |
| Summary |
In May 2013, City Council adopted the Toronto Social Procurement Framework to guide the development of an evidence-based social procurement policy by the end of 2015. This report provides an update on the implementation of the Toronto Social Procurement Framework.
To advance a City approach to social procurement, the Interdivisional Working Group on Social Procurement has been working to (1) engage stakeholders; (2) identify City purchasing opportunities to pilot social procurement initiatives; and (3) develop an evaluation and monitoring process for pilot initiatives. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 30, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the Treasurer on Update on the Toronto Social Procurement Framework
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72547.pdf) |
| EX44.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Development of a Community/Cultural Hub in Weston - Mount Dennis - Status Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request City staff to conduct the necessary due diligence on the Weston Mount Dennis Community/Cultural Hub Proposal and report to Council, through the Executive Committee, in early 2015 on City and third-party resources, including funding, which would be required to proceed with the Proposal. |
| Origin |
| (August 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Affordable Housing Office |
| Summary |
For more than five years the community of Weston Mount Dennis has championed the need for re-investment and revitalization as an important way to address the many challenges in this Neighbourhood Improvement Area.
The City has also supported this work through a number of initiatives, including the commissioning of a feasibility study on a cultural/creative hub prepared by Toronto Artscape, hosting a Design Charrette in the community and the Toronto Parking Authority (the "TPA") issuing a For Sale by Expression of Interest (EOI) for the sale of 22 John Street to accommodate a pedestrian bridge over the Georgetown South rail corridor/Union-Pearson Air-Rail Link.
The sale would also support the proposed redevelopment of the surface parking lot at 22 John Street with housing, replacement municipal parking facility, a farmers' market and a cultural hub.
This report provides an update on the proposed development of the Weston Mount Dennis Community/Cultural Hub and artist live/work space, particularly the results of the Toronto Parking Authority Expression of Interest (the "Proposal"). This report requests that City staff conduct the necessary due diligence and report to Council in early 2015 on the City resources and support, including funding, which would be required to proceed with the Proposal. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture
and the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Development of a Community/Cultural Hub in Weston Mount Dennis - Status Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72656.pdf) |
| EX44.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Toronto Radio Infrastructure Project Update |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (July 29, 2014) from the Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the Chief, Toronto Police Service and the Chief, Toronto Emergency Medical Services, for information. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the Chief, Toronto Police Service, and the Chief, Toronto Emergency Medical Services |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the progress and capital expenditures of the Toronto Radio Infrastructure Replacement Project (TRIP) for Toronto Police, Toronto Fire Services and Toronto Emergency Medical Services.
The project has experienced schedule delays that will result in the final completion of the project in mid-2015. However, the project is still on target to meet critical operational goal of implementing core digital infrastructure by the end of 2014.
Higher than anticipated construction costs requiring budget adjustments will be considered by the Budget Committee during the 2015 Capital and Operating Budget process. An amendment to an existing contract with Motorola Solutions Canada to increase the contract value because of added construction costs and added lifecycle costs related to equipment change orders will be required and will be subject to budget approval in 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the Chief, Toronto Police Service, and the Chief, Toronto Emergency Medical Services on
Toronto Radio Infrastructure Project Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72448.pdf) |
| EX44.22 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Strategic Property Acquisitions |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize funding from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund ("LARF"), in the amount of 15 percent of the uncommitted balance in the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund as an approved budget for the acquisition of property that is determined to be strategically important to the City in accordance with Table 1 in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. City Council direct the Chief Corporate Officer to report back to Council on all properties acquired pursuant to this strategic property acquisitions framework as part of the regular semi-annual reporting on real estate transactions.
3. City Council authorize an amendment to the Delegation of Authority in Certain Real Estate Matters (Item EX43.7, adopted by Council on May 11 and 12, 2010) by adding a General Condition that provides a higher level of approving authority for the acquisition of strategically important properties as outlined in Table 2 in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek funding for the acquisition of property that is determined to be strategically important for the City to acquire, but for which there is no approved capital budget available.
It is proposed that 15 percent of the uncommitted balance in the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund be dedicated towards the acquisition of strategically important property on a one time basis. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Strategic Property Acquisitions
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72747.pdf) |
| EX44.24 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2014 |
| Bill 982 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code by the establishment and addition of the following discretionary reserve fund accounts:
a. Long Term Liabilities Reserve Fund - the purpose of which will be to ensure funding for the Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) long-term liability for unsettled accident claims, with criteria as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;
b. Hoarding Sign Occupancy Fee Reserve Fund - the purpose of which will be to hold funds from the hoarding sign fee to be used to create new elements and features and improve existing elements and features of the public right of way through the creation of temporary and permanent art, with a particular focus on community arts programs involving disadvantaged youth and newcomers in the creation of art, with criteria as set out in Appendix 2 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and
c. Development Application Review Reserve Fund – the purpose of which will be to provide funding to minimize the impact of development application fee revenue fluctuations on City Planning Division’s Operating Budget and/ or to create and maintain systems, resources and processes to facilitate service delivery and improvements with criteria as set out in Appendix 7 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. City Council amend the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Reserve Group in Schedule 1 of Chapter 227 by:
a. creating and adding thereto a new reserve account named the "Vehicle Reserve – OEM" the purpose of which is to fund replacement of vehicles and associated equipment with criteria as set out in Appendix 3 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with an initial balance as a result of transferring $14,744 from Vehicle Reserve – PPF&A (XQ1401); and
b. creating a new reserve account named the "Vehicle Reserve – Ex Non-motorized Equipment" the purpose of which is to fund replacement of non-motorized equipment with criteria as set out in Appendix 4 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
3. City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the "Parkway Forest Child Care Reserve Fund" in Schedule 9 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which will be used to fund the purchase of new or replacement larger equipment items like appliances such as refrigerators, stoves, dishwashers, clothes dryers and washers; change tables; and counters, etc. with criteria as set out in Appendix 5 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with an initial balance as a result of transferring $188,911 from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103) to the Parkway Forest Child Care Reserve Fund.
4. City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the "Toronto Transit Expansion Reserve Fund" in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which will be to serve as a funding source to support transit expansion where the Provincial and/or the Federal Governments have committed to matching any City contribution to said Fund with criteria as set out in Appendix 6 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
5. City Council amend the name of the "Development Application Review Fee Reserve Fund" in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227 to "CP Development Technology Reserve Fund" with no other change to the criteria to reduce confusion about the funding and/or use of this account vis-à-vis the account created in Recommendation 1c above.
6. City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the "Winter Maintenance Contribution Reserve Fund" in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, to provide funding to minimize the impact of winter maintenance contract renewals with criteria as set out in Appendix 8 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
7. City Council change authority over the "Bike Share Program Reserve" in Schedule 1 of Chapter 227 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to the General Manager, Transportation Services and that the criteria for the operation of the account be refined to reflect the criteria set out in Appendix 9 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
8. City Council transfer the following accounts from the former schedule to the new schedule without any other change in the operational criteria:
9. City Council close and delete the following accounts from Chapter 227, as necessary, because they have zero balances:
10. City Council transfer funds in the amount of $681.42 from the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Skateboard Donation Reserve (XQ4222 to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget Account - South General Parks Technical Services – Trade (P12017) and thereafter close and delete the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Skateboard Donation Reserve from Municipal Code Chapter 227.
11. City Council amend Chapter 227 in accordance with Recommendations 1 to 10, above.
12. City Council direct the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bills in Council. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
This report seeks Council approval to implement a number of housekeeping amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds. These amendments include establishing new reserve funds, refining criteria of existing accounts, transferring accounts between schedules, and deleting some accounts which are no longer required. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 - 9 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72626.pdf) |
| EX44.25 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Capital Grant and Loan from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) to invest, by way of performance contract financing, up to $3,000,000 (net of incentives and rebates) in energy and water efficiency measures in seven Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) buildings through its Energy Savings Performance Agreements Program (the "Project").
2. City Council authorize Toronto Atmospheric Fund to accept a grant of $511,466 from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM"), for the purpose of supporting the eligible costs of the Project, which funds shall not require repayment by Toronto Community Housing Corporation under the Energy Savings Performance Agreement.
3. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to enter into a loan agreement and any ancillary or related documents with Toronto Atmospheric Fund, to lend $2,557,333.00 (the "Funds") to Toronto Atmospheric Fund, which Funds are to be borrowed by the City from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities under its Green Municipal Fund Program, for the purpose of financing the eligible costs of the Project on essentially the same terms and conditions as the City is borrowing the Funds from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and on such other terms as may be deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in consultation with the City Solicitor, including that the City take the following security from Toronto Atmospheric Fund in the event of a default by Toronto Atmospheric Fund on its payments under the loan agreement:
a. firstly, an assignment of all proceeds of the Project which includes all amounts payable by Toronto Community Housing Corporation or a third party to Toronto Atmospheric Fund and all payments guaranteed by a third party; and
b. secondly, a draw on the endowment funds held by the City in trust for Toronto Atmospheric Fund (the "Toronto Atmospheric Fund Funds").
4. City Council direct the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors, in the event of default by Toronto Atmospheric Fund under the loan agreement, to withdraw any funds necessary from the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Funds to allow the City to realize on the security included in the loan agreement as recommended above, and that any such draw on the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Funds will not be replenished by the City, in accordance with the Toronto Atmospheric Fund legislation, as the draw will have been made for the purpose of satisfying Toronto Atmospheric Fund's indebtedness to the City.
5. City Council, in accordance with the City's relationship framework with Toronto Atmospheric Fund which requires Council approval of borrowing by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund in excess of $2 million, approve Toronto Atmospheric Fund's borrowing the Funds from the City and entering into a loan agreement with the City for a term beyond the current term of Council.
6. City Council deem the loan of the Funds to Toronto Atmospheric Fund recommended by this report to be in the interest of the City. |
| Origin |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
In March 2012, the Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) submitted an application to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Green Municipal Fund (GMF application #12110) for financing energy and water efficiency measures in seven Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings through its Energy Savings Performance Agreements Program (the "Project"). A letter dated August 1, 2013, from Federation of Canadian Municipalities confirmed that the application has been approved for a grant in the amount of $511,466 as well as a loan in the amount of $2,557,333.
While Toronto Atmospheric Fund can enter into a loan agreement with Federation of Canadian Municipalities on its own, the interest rate charged by Federation of Canadian Municipalities on the loan will be higher than if the loan agreement is directly with the City of Toronto. The interest rates offered through Federation of Canadian Municipalities are very attractive and are lower than what the City would borrow through traditional public debt markets. In addition, as per the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Relationship Framework with the City of Toronto, City Council authority is required for Toronto Atmospheric Fund to receive grants greater than $500,000, loans greater than $2 million, and to enter into agreements that extend past the term of City Council.
This report seeks City Council approval to enter into an agreement with Toronto Atmospheric Fund whereby the City would borrow the funds from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund and then lend to Toronto Atmospheric Fund the same funds borrowed by the City from Federation of Canadian Municipalities for the purposes of financing the eligible costs of the Project at a lower interest rate. The associated debt charges will be recovered by the City from Toronto Atmospheric Fund and paid to Federation of Canadian Municipalities. This report also seeks Council authority for Toronto Atmospheric Fund to receive a grant of $511,466 from Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and for Toronto Atmospheric Fund to enter into a $3,000,000 Energy Savings Performance Agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation to finance the Project. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 5, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Grant and Loan from the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72595.pdf) |
| EX44.26 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Compliance with User Fee Policy - Toronto Police Services Proposed Vulnerable Sector Screening (VSS) Fees and New User Fees |
| See also Item EX44.48 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to ensure that a public consultation is undertaken before any new user fees are recommended to City Council for approval.
2. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to explore opportunities to automate the Vulnerable Sector Screening (VSS) process where possible and, if any changes to the process are introduced, review the full cost recovery model for the Vulnerable Sector Screening Program accordingly. |
| Origin |
| (August 15, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
This supplementary staff report is in response to the report from the Toronto Police Services Board on the Toronto Police Service's Reference Check Program. The Board's report is responding to the motion approved by City Council during its meeting on June 10, 11, 12 and 13 requesting that the Board work with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to ensure that the Vulnerable Sector Screening fees are in compliance with the City's User Fee Policy and report back to the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee.
This report provides information on the Vulnerable Sector Screening (VSS) process and existing backlog, as well as a review of the proposed VSS fees against the City's User Fee policy and full cost recovery principle.
In general, the Vulnerable Sector Screening fees are in compliance with the City's User Fee Policy, except for the public consultation requirement. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 15, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Compliance with User Fee Policy - Toronto Police Services Proposed Vulnerable Sector Screening (VSS) Fees and New User Fees
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72890.pdf) Appendix A - Vulnerable Sector Screening Work Flow Process (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72892.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Fees for the Toronto Police Service Vulnerable Sector Screenings - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72651.pdf) |
| EX44.27 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Adjustments to the 2014 - 2023 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to fund the Acquisition of a Portion of the Parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize that Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2014 – 2023 Capital Budget and Plan be amended to add a new capital project for the acquisition of parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street, with a 2015 cash flow as identified in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to be fully funded from Parkland Acquisition South District (Local land) reserve account XR2208.
2. City Council consider this report and its related attachments concurrently with Item TE34.31, titled "Final Report – 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadlabane Street – Zoning Amendment Application," at its meeting of August 25, 2014.
3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A remain confidential under the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as it relates to the acquisition by the City of property.
4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A following the closing of any purchase transaction. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to approve an adjustment to the 2014 – 2023 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation creating a Capital Account to fund the acquisition of a portion of the parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, on Adjustments to the 2014 - 2023 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to fund the Acquisition of a Portion of the Parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72727.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 Attachment 2 - Map of the Parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72749.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Linda Brett, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Willow Dumas (EX.Supp.EX44.27.1)
(August 14, 2014) Letter from Ian Flett (EX.Supp.EX44.27.2) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Hodge MacEwen (EX.Supp.EX44.27.3) (August 17, 2014) Letter from Andrew Horberry, President, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association (EX.Supp.EX44.27.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49401.pdf) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Cecilia Rayo (EX.Supp.EX44.27.5) (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Marilyn Green (EX.Supp.EX44.27.6) (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Marilyn Tait McClellan (EX.New.EX44.27.7) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (BENA) (EX.New.EX44.27.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49508.pdf) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Erica Rosenfield (Erica Petkov) (EX.New.EX44.27.9) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Rick Whitten-Stovall, President, Bay Cloverhill Community Association, forwarded by Cathy Carnevali (EX.New.EX44.27.10) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49510.pdf) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Cathy Carnevali (EX.New.EX44.27.11) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Bonna Whitten (EX.New.EX44.27.12) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Seungwoo Baek (EX.Supp.EX44.27.13) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Mary Noonan (EX.New.EX44.27.14) |
| EX44.28 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:7 |
| Acquisition of a Portion of 20 Starview Lane (adjoining St. Basil the Great College School) for Park and Recreation Purposes |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to negotiate the acquisition of the Property with Toronto Catholic District School Board at a purchase price as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and authorize the City to enter into an agreement of purchase and sale substantially on the terms outlined in Appendix A to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and on such other terms and conditions and such related documents as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize an amendment to the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget to create a new capital project called "20 Starview Lane - Community Centre Land Acquisition" as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, including all fees and disbursements, to be funded from Parkland Acquisition – City-wide Land Acquisition (XR2210) when the successful negotiations are completed.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the transaction, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that she may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the contemplated transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.
5. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 6, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A remain confidential, as it pertains to a proposed or pending acquisition of land for municipal or local board purposes.
6. City Council authorize that the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek authority to negotiate the purchase of a surplus 1.9344 hectare (4.78 acres) property adjoining the school site at 20 Starview Lane (the "School Site") from the Toronto Catholic District School Board ("TCDSB") for parkland purposes. These lands are a potential location for the new Western North York Community Centre and are shown on Appendix "B" attached hereto (the "Property"). |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, on Acquisition of a Portion of 20 Starview Lane (adjoining St. Basil the Great College School) for Park and Recreation Purposes
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72800.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West (EX.New.EX44.28.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49521.pdf) |
| EX44.29 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Direction to Staff to Evaluate Glebe Manor Lawn Bowling Club (196 Manor Road East) for Parkland Acquisition |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to negotiate, and the City to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the Property, with the owner of 196 Manor Road East on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer in consultation with the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council amend the 2014 Capital Budget of Parks, Forestry and Recreation by the addition of a project "196 Manor Road East Parkland Acquisition" in an amount set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation with funding provided from the Parkland Acquisition - South District Local Parkland Reserve Fund (XR-2208) upon receipt of an executed Offer to Sell from the owner.
3. City Council authorize either of the Chief Corporate Officer or the Director, Real Estate Services to execute documents related to this transaction on behalf of the City.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the transaction, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that she may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the contemplated transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.
6. City Council authorize that the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
7. City Council direct that the confidential recommendations and information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation remain confidential until such time as the proposed transaction has been completed. |
| Origin |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the City's options and to seek authority to have the ability to negotiate the purchase of a 1,514 square metre / 16,297 square feet parcel of land known as 196 Manor Road East (the "Property") as shown on Appendix "A" attached hereto. If acquired from the owner, these lands would be for used for parkland purposes. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 5, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Direction to Staff to Evaluate Glebe Manor Lawn Bowling Club (196 Manor Road East) for Parkland Acquisition
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72802.pdf) (August 5, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| EX44.30 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Suspension of Pave-1 Construction Limited (an affiliate of previously suspended IPAC Paving Limited) from being Awarded or Granted City Contracts; bypassing the Lowest Bidder on Tender Call 202-2014; and Amendment of Contract 47017945 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council suspend Pave-1 Construction Limited, and any legal entity affiliated with or of the same operating mind as that of Pave-1 Construction Limited, IPAC Paving Limited, Roadmill Construction Incorporated or Sebastian Corbo, as determined by the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management in consultation with the City Solicitor, from being awarded or granted any future City contracts, or otherwise profiting from any City contracts.
2. City Council bypass the lowest bidder, Pave-1 Construction Limited, and award a contract to C. Valley Paving Limited., being the second lowest bidder meeting specifications of Tender 202-2014, for the restoration to roads, sidewalks and landscaping in various locations within the Etobicoke York and North York Districts in the amount of $1,741,350.00 net of all taxes ($1,771,997.76 net of HST Recoveries).
3. City Council amend Contract No. 47017945 (Tender 256-2013) for the restoration to roads, sidewalks and landscaping in various locations within the Etobicoke York and North York Districts, with D & A Road Services Incorporated. by an additional amount of $500,000.00 net of all taxes ($508,800.00 net of HST recoveries) revising the current contract value from $989,600.00 to $1,489,600.00 net of all taxes ($1,515,816.96 net of HST recoveries) and extend the contract validity from November 4, 2014 to December 31, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the General Manager, Toronto Water |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council suspend Pave-1 Construction Limited ("Pave-1") from being awarded future City contracts due to its affiliation with previously suspended contractor IPAC Paving Limited ("IPAC"); bypass Pave-1 in relation to Tender 202-2014; and extend an existing contract to prevent the interruption of City services. The report is being submitted to the Executive Committee for consideration to allow for public notice, as some elements of the report were not finalized prior to the publication of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee agenda. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and
the General Manager, Toronto Water on Suspension of Pave-1 Construction Limited (an affiliate of previously suspended IPAC Paving Limited) from being Awarded or Granted City Contracts; Bypassing the Lowest Bidder on Tender Call 202-2014; and Amendment of Contract 47017945
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72652.pdf) (July 31, 2014) Appendix A - Corporate Profile Report for Pave-1 Construction Limited (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72653.pdf) (July 31, 2014) Appendix B - Corporate Profile Report for IPAC Paving Limited (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72654.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Mark Geiger, Blaney McMurtry, Barristers and Solicitors LLP |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Mark E. Geiger (EX.New.EX44.30.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49505.pdf) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Mark E. Geiger (EX.New.EX44.30.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49506.pdf) |
| EX44.31 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Public Appointments Process Improvements |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Public Appointments Policy to provide for the following process improvements:
a. Staggered terms of office for all boards not otherwise prescribed by law so that the terms of half the members expire every two years;
b. Continuous intake of applications, and use of the resulting pool of applicants to fill vacancies instead of the appointment of alternates;
c. Public reporting of recommended candidates' names to City Council for appointment; and
d. Consultation with board chairs and chief executives on the required skills and experience needed for a board during the staff screening process.
2. City Council establish additional nominating panels to assist the Civic Appointments Committee in the interviewing and nomination of candidates for appointment as set out in Appendix 1 of the report (August 6, 2014) from the City Clerk, such panels to:
a. Report directly to City Council;
b. Be composed of three Members of Council; and
c. Be appointed by City Council on the recommendation of the Striking Committee following a canvass of Members for their interest in serving on the panels to be conducted by the City Clerk following the 2014 election.
3. City Council request the City Clerk to review the public appointments policy and process in light of the first round of appointments in the new term and make any recommendations for further improvements. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the City Clerk |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to make some improvements to the public appointments process in advance of the recruitment for candidates to fill expiring terms in early 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the City Clerk on Public Appointments Process Improvements
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72690.pdf) |
| EX44.33 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Budget Adjustment to the Toronto Public Health 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Long Term Care Education Day |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve an increase to the Toronto Public Health 2014 Approved Operating Budget by $20.0 thousand gross and $0 net budget for the administration of an annual Long Term Care Education Event. |
| Origin |
| (June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report seeks approval for a budget adjustment to the Toronto Public Health (TPH) 2014 Approved Operating Budget for the planning and delivery of Long Term Care Education Day which is an annual infection prevention and control education event for long term care homes and retirement homes in the City of Toronto.
Toronto Public Health has led the planning and delivery of this education event in collaboration with Infection Prevention and Control – Greater Toronto Area (IPAC-GTA) (formerly known as the Toronto Practitioners in Infection Control) and Public Health Ontario since 2006. To-date, the event has been funded by IPAC-GTA on a cost recovery basis. Toronto Public Health financial oversight of the event will ensure appropriate cost recovery of funds and provide improved operational decision-making related to planning the event. IPAC-GTA has agreed to transfer the funding and financial oversight for the event to Toronto Public Health and will continue to participate in event planning and recruitment of speakers. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Budget Adjustment to the Toronto Public Health 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Long Term Care Education Day
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72384.htm) (April 28, 2014) Decision Letter from the Board of Health on Budget Adjustment to the Toronto Public Health 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Long Term Care Education Day (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70926.pdf) (April 4, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Budget Adjustment to the Toronto Public Health 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Long Term Care Education Day (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70925.pdf) |
| EX44.34 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Response to City Council Motions Pertaining to Paid Duties |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the letter (June 20, 2014) from the Budget Committee, for information. |
| Origin |
| (June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide Toronto City Council, via the Budget Committee, with the Toronto Police Service’s response to City Council Motions pertaining to Paid Duties. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Response to City Council Motions Pertaining to Paid Duties
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72441.htm) (May 22, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Response to City Council Motions Pertaining to Paid Duties (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72466.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) E-mail from Councillor Josh Matlow (EX.New.EX44.34.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49503.pdf) |
| EX44.35 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the 2014 Capital Budget for Exhibition Place by reducing the Building Repairs project at the National Soccer Stadium (BMO Field), funded from the National Soccer Stadium Reserve Fund (XR3601), by $240,933.
2. City Council amend the 2014 Capital Budget for Exhibition Place by adding a new sub-project for BMO Field Mould Remediation for $610,256, fully funded from the National Soccer Stadium Reserve Fund (XR3601). |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report seeks approval for adjustments to the 2014 Capital Budget for Exhibition Place, which is fully funded from the Soccer Stadium Capital Maintenance Reserve Fund (XR3601) to accommodate the emergency mould remediation work required at BMO Field.
The report also recommends a $240,933 reduction to the Building Repairs project at the National Soccer Stadium (BMO Field) which was carried forward into the 2014 Capital Budget from 2013 unspent funds and is no longer required, to assist in providing funding for the new sub-project for Mould Remediation for $610,256. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72630.htm) (July 21, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer on BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72610.pdf) (May 9, 2014) Appendix A - BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation, Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, Item No. 13, approved May 28, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72588.pdf) (June 11, 2014) Appendix B - BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation, Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, Item No. 8 approved June 25, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72609.pdf) |
| 35a | BMO Field - Executive Suites Mould Remediation |
| Origin |
| (August 18, 2014) Letter from Dianne Young, Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place |
| Summary |
Response to questions raised and motion brought by the Budget Committee of August 6, 2014 concerning the mould remediation at BMO Field. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 18, 2014) Letter from Dianne Young, Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72944.pdf) |
| EX44.36 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Capital Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the following adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to ensure proper funding is in place to tender and award a contract to hire a project manager to complete the feasibility analysis for the Shelter Development / Redevelopment Project:
a. adjust the 2014 Approved Capital Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration by reallocating $0.651 million gross and debt, with cash flow in 2014, from the Capital Repairs/ Replacement City Project to the Shelter Development/Redevelopment project; and
b. amend the 2015-2023 Capital Plan for the Shelter Development/ Redevelopment project by approving a 2015 cash flow commitment of $1.000 million which is currently approved in 2015 as a future year plan estimate.
2. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to identify either scope reductions or reallocations from other projects to ensure cash flow for Toronto Rocket Yard and Storage Tract Accommodation and Leslie Barns LRT Maintenance and Storage Facility do not exceed the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and report back prior to year-end with any changes that require City Council authority.
3. City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2014-2023 Approved Capital Budget and Plan detailed in Appendix 2 to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with no incremental impact on debt funding.
4. City Council receive for information Appendix 3 to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer which lists one (1) capital project for Court Services that has been cancelled and will be closed.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the 2014 Capital Variance Report for the five month period ended May 31, 2014 as well as projected actual expenditures to December 31, 2014. Furthermore, the report seeks Council’s approval for 2014 in-year budget adjustments.
This report also provides for information the cancellation of one capital project for Courts Services that will be closed, with funding of $0.140 million to be returned to Court Services Stabilization Reserve.
Capital expenditures for the five months ended May 31, 2014 totalled $628.339 million or 14.8 percent of the 2014 Approved Capital Budget of $4.258 billion (see Table 1 below). This spending pattern is consistent with prior years as the City's capital activities tend to accelerate in the second part of the year. As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1 to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, actual expenditures to year-end are expected to reach $3.248 billion or 76.3 percent of the total 2014 Approved Capital Budget; 24 of 33 City Programs and Agencies are projecting spending in excess of 70 percent by year-end: Tax Supported Programs project a spending rate of 75.9 percent to year-end; while Rate Supported Programs project year-end spending rate of 78.1 percent.
The rate of spending in the first five months was driven largely by expropriation process delays for the acquisition of various sites, poor weather conditions, longer than planned timelines to obtain necessary approvals or required permits; delays in securing funds from cost-sharing partners; design issues and difficulty in securing necessary resources for project delivery. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72619.htm) (July 21, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72611.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Appendix 1 - 2014 Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Five months Ended May 31, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72612.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Appendix 2 - In-Year Adjustments for the Five months Ended May 31, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72613.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Appendix 3 - Capital Project to be Closed (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72614.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Appendix 4 - Capital Variance Explanation - Programs and Agencies (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72615.pdf) |
| EX44.37 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Operating Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the budget adjustments detailed in Appendix F to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to amend the 2014 Approved Operating Budget between Programs that have no impact to the 2014 Approved Net Operating Budget.
2. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to forward a report to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer by September 25, 2014 providing an explanation of the decline in the number of Provincial Offences Tickets being issued between January 2012 to date, outlining the forecasted number of tickets to be issued in 2014 and 2015, as well as identifying steps the Service is taking to address the declining volume of tickets. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Operating Variance for the five-month period ended May 31, 2014 as well as year-end projections and to request Council's approval for amendments to the 2014 Approved Operating Budget between Programs that have no net impact to the 2014 Approved Net Operating Budget to ensure accurate reporting and financial accountability.
For the five-month period ended May 31, 2014, Tax Supported Operations reported a favourable net variance of $37.004 million or 2.4 percent, as noted in Table 1 below.
Under-spending was driven largely by salary and benefit savings from vacant positions and a reduction in caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services. Higher than budgeted revenue from permit applications for Toronto Building, Toronto Hydro Dividend Income and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax has also contributed to the favourable net variance for the five month period. The under-spending was partially offset by over-expenditures for Tax Deficiencies, City Planning and the Vacancy Rebate Program.
Projections indicate that the year-end position will result in a net favourable variance of $1.176 million. The year-end projection is primarily due to projected continuation of salary and benefit savings from vacant positions and reduction in caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services to year-end. Higher than budgeted revenue from permit applications for Toronto Building, Toronto Hydro Dividend Income and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax realized in the five month period will be maintained to year-end.
The favourable variance noted above will be partially off-set by projected under-achieved net revenue from Court Services ($27.053 million), Toronto Transit Commission Conventional Service ($8.0 million) and Supplementary Taxes ($8.0 million).
Table 2 below summarizes Rate Supported Program net variances:
The year-to-date favourable net variance of $0.756 million was driven by the Toronto Parking Authority's under-spending of $0.633 million largely from savings in salaries and benefits for part time cashiers and lower maintenance costs. In addition, Solid Waste Management Services was under-spent by $0.389 million primarily due to lower gross expenditures for various items, mainly driven by delayed payments for waste disposal in alternative landfills and contracted processing due to the billing process.
Toronto Water reported an over-expenditure of $0.267 million mainly due to higher than budgeted utility costs from the colder than expected winter as well as fluctuation in hydro use associated with wastewater treatment process and water transmission and haulage costs of biosolids.
Rate Supported Programs collectively project year-end net under-spending of $10.437 million, primarily from Toronto Water due to higher than budgeted revenues from private water agreements, additional recoveries for new service connections and associated user fees.
Table 3 below summarizes the vacancy rate for the five months ended May 31, 2014 and projections to year-end.
As of May 31, 2014, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 3.2 percent after gapping for an approved complement of 53,023.3 positions. The forecasted year-end vacancy rate after gapping is projected to be 0.5 percent for an approved complement of 52,689.6 positions. A more detailed analysis is provided in the Approved Complement Section of this report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72620.htm) (July 21, 2014) Report and Appendices A - G from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Five-Month Period Ended May 30, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72602.pdf) |
| EX44.38 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Environment and Energy Division 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments for the Sustainable Energy Plan |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the creation of two new sub-projects and the reallocation of funds in the Sustainable Energy Plan's 2014 Capital Budget and 2015 to 2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $1.467 million with a zero gross and net budget impact, as outlined in Table 1 in the report (July 22, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report requests City Council's authority to amend the Sustainable Energy Plan 2014 Capital Budget and 2015 to 2023 Capital Plan by creating two new projects to provide funding for lighting and conservation and demand management retrofits at Exhibition Place, and a demand response project at Long-Term Care Homes and Services Division's Kipling Acres. Funding will be re-allocated within the approved budget and plan amounts resulting in a zero gross and net impact to the Sustainable Energy Plan 2014 Capital Budget. This action will allow the City to direct funding to eligible conservation and demand management projects that will have positive economic and environmental benefits on the City as a whole. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Environment and Energy Division 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments for the Sustainable Energy Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72621.htm) (July 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Environment and Energy Division 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments for the Sustainable Energy Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72603.pdf) |
| EX44.39 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments, Accelerations and Deferrals (Third Quarter) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Facilities Management and Real Estate's approved 2014 Capital Budget in the amount of $1.9 million as illustrated in Schedule A to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer with zero gross and net impact.
2. City Council authorize the deferral and acceleration of funds in Facilities Management and Real Estate's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015 - 2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $3.395 million as illustrated in Schedule B to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer with zero gross and net impact. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report requests authority to amend the Facilities Management and Real Estate's (FM&RE) 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan, by reallocating funding within approved budget and plan amounts to better meet program requirements and cash flows. The adjustment of funds will have a zero net impact corporately and will better align 2014 and future cash flows with Facilities Management and Real Estate program requirements. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments, Accelerations and Deferrals (Third Quarter)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72622.htm) (July 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments, Accelerations and Deferrals (Third Quarter) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72604.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Schedule A - Budget Adjustments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72605.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Schedule B - Deferrals and Accelerations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72606.pdf) |
| EX44.40 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Toronto Fire Services - Capital Budget Adjustments |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the cash flow funding adjustments to two capital projects included in Fire Services' 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan, with a zero debt impact, as detailed in Table 1 in the report (July 25, 2014) from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report seeks approval for cash flow acceleration of $1.100 million from 2015 to 2014 for the Station A (Station 414) Highway 27 and Rexdale Boulevard project and the deferral of $0.406 million in cash flowing funding from 2014 to 2015 for the Replacement of Fire Station 135 - Chaplin Fire Station project.
The acceleration of $1.100 million in approved funding commitments from 2015 to 2014 for the Station A project is required in order for land to be purchased to ensure the new fire station is constructed as scheduled. A parcel of land has been recently identified as being available and meets the needs of Toronto Fire Services. This parcel of land was identified as the original intended site was no longer available for purchase by the City.
The $1.100 million required in 2014 for the Station A project is funded from debt of $0.406 million with the balance of $0.694 million funded from development charges and reserves. The increase in debt funding of $0.406 million in 2014 for the Station A project will be offset by the deferral of the 2014 approved cash flow of $0.406 million (funded from debt) for the Replacement of Fire Station 135 - Chaplin Fire Station project.
These budget adjustments are required to match cash flow funding to projected actual expenditures for the two projects at the end of 2014 and will have no impact on the City Council approved annual debt levels. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Decision Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Fire Services - Capital Budget Adjustments
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72623.htm) (July 25, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Toronto Fire Services - Capital Budget Adjustments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72607.pdf) |
| EX44.41 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Toronto Water Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council reallocate funds in Toronto Water’s approved 2014 Water Capital Budget and 2015-2013 Capital Plan in the amount of $25.575 million, from projects that have been completed or awarded under-budget to those requiring additional funding in the same amount, as presented in Schedule A in the report (July 23, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero Budget impact.
2. City Council defer and accelerate funds in Toronto Water's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $10.240 million as presented in Schedule A in the report (July 23, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero gross impact.
3. City Council amend Toronto Water's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan to add a new basement flooding project in the amount of $12 million as presented in Schedule A in the report (July 23, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, to be funded from the Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund (XR6004). |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report requests City Council’s authority to amend Toronto Water’s Approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan by adjusting project cash flows contained within the Budget and Plan, respectively, to better meet program requirements. The adjustment of project cash flows will have a $12 million gross overall Capital Budget impact and will better align 2014 and future year cash flows within Toronto Water's capital project delivery schedule and program requirements. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Decision Lettter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Water Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72624.htm) (July 23, 2014) Report and Schedule A from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72608.pdf) (August 22, 2014) Report and Schedule A from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72629.pdf) |
| EX44.42 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Approval of Cash Flow Commitments for 2015 Approved Capital Plan State-of-Good-Repair Projects for Transportation Services |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council increase 2015 cash flow commitments for projects/subprojects totalling $31.678 million, comprising of cash flow commitments for Transportation Services projects with an offsetting decrease in the same projects/subprojects in the 2015 Capital Plan, as detailed in Appendix 1 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report through the 2015 Budget process the amount of additional capital funding required to increase service levels so that permanent repairs to sidewalks are completed in a maximum of 2 years from when temporary repairs are made, as opposed to the current 4 year maximum.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to request additional funding through the 2015 Budget process to increase the number of local road rehabilitation projects.
4. City Council request staff to report in 2015 on the costs of maintaining City boulevards. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request Council’s authority to commit 2015 expenditures for state-of-good-repair capital projects in advance of Council’s approval of Transportation Services’ 2015 Capital Budget and 2016-2024 Capital Plan, in order to advance the start of construction projects and achieve higher rates of capital delivery; and help realize more competitive off-season bids.
Specifically, approval is being sought for increases in 2015 cash flow commitments totalling $31.678 million for Transportation Services projects. This request will not increase or decrease the 2014 – 2023 Approved Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services in any year over the 10 year period. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Approval of Cash Flow Commitments for 2015 Approved Capital Plan State-of-Good-Repair Projects for Transportation Services
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72625.htm) (August 5, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Approval of Cash Flow Commitments for 2015 Approved Capital Plan State-of-Good-Repair Projects for Transportation Services (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72617.pdf) |
| EX44.43 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Transportation Services 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to reinstate the $4,000,000 to the Scarlett/St. Clair/Dundas Project - WBS No. CTP811-43 as part of Transportation Services' 2015 Capital Budget and 2016-2024 Capital Plan.
2. City Council authorize the reallocation of 2014 funds in Transportation Services' approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $8,000,000 as presented in Schedule A to the report (August 5, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.
3. City Council authorizes an increase of $273,066 in 2014 cash flow for the TO360 Wayfinding Strategy, fully funded from a Toronto Transit Commission capital contribution and as presented in Schedule B to the report (August 5, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee |
| Summary |
This report requests City Council’s authority to amend Transportation Services' approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan by adjusting project cash flows contained within the capital budget and capital plan, respectively, to better meet program requirements. The adjustment of project cash flows will better align 2014 cash flows with Transportation Services' capital project delivery schedule and program requirements. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Transportation Services 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72631.htm) (August 5, 2014) Report and Schedule A and B from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Transportation Services 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72618.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| EX44.44 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Letter of Support to Griffin Centre on behalf of the Disability Issues Committee |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chair, Disability Issues Committee to write a letter of support to the Griffin Centre, on behalf of the Disability Issues Committee. |
| Origin |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee |
| Summary |
The following Working Groups of the Disability Issues Committee provided updates to the Disability Issues Committee:
Housing Working Group Outreach/Employment Working Group Transportation Working Group |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee on Request for Letter of Support to Griffin Centre on behalf of Disability Issues Committee
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72637.pdf) (June 27, 2014) Submission from the Outreach/Employment Working Group, Disability Issues Committee (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72638.pdf) |
| EX44.45 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Letter Respecting 2014 - 2018 Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Multi-Year Accessibility Plan |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to give a presentation on the 2014 - 2018 TTC Multi-Year Accessibility Plan at the next meeting of the Disability Issues Committee. |
| Origin |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee |
| Summary |
At its meeting on April 30, 2014, the Toronto Transit Commission considered the report "2014-2018 TTC Multi-Year Accessibility Plan" and forwarded it to the Disability Issues Committee for consideration. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee on Request for Letter Respecting 2014 - 2018 TTC Multi-Year Accessibility Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72640.pdf) |
| EX44.47 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Recommendations Arising from the Community Safety Task Force |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council to request the Province of Ontario to:
a. through the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC), require Local Health Integration Networks (LHIN) to provide funding to housing organizations (or through community agencies to housing organizations) similar to that being piloted at 291 George Street with the Toronto Central LHIN and social agencies, reducing costs for emergency room visits, policing and for the Toronto Community Housing Corporation while also reducing the number of tenants being taken to the Landlord and Tenant Board;
b. increase funding for supportive housing;
c. through the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care or Local Health Integration Network, increase funding for existing supportive housing agencies operating in Toronto Community Housing Corporation space under an agreement. Increases would be based on a flexible model, if we could demonstrate that there is a spike in activity or supportive need based on agreed indicators;
d. provide funding for building retrofits and new construction to increase sound-proofing in Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings (to mitigate noise, a major anti-social behaviour issue).
2. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to consult with the Information and Privacy Commission and the Ontario Human Rights Commission in order to identify and address any privacy or human rights issues that may arise with respect to:
a. the creation an exception, under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA), for Toronto Police Service to share information with Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) regarding incidents on TCHC property; and
b. a review the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) to identify opportunities to expedite the eviction process in cases where eviction is merited. |
| Origin |
| (June 17, 2014) Report from Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request that the Executive Committee approve recommendations arising from the Community Safety Task Force’s report entitled Final Report – Community Safety Task Force. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 17, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B, from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Recommendations Arising from the Community Safety Task Force
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71760.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| EX44.48 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Responding to Requests for Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks - Update on Fees to be Charged |
| See also Item EX44.26 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, authorize the Toronto Police Services Board to increase fees, and establish new fees, as outlined below:
a. the fee for vulnerable sector screenings will increase from $50.00 to $65.00 per request for the purposes of employment, effective January 01, 2015;
b. the fee for vulnerable sector screenings will increase from $15.00 to $20.00 per request for volunteers, effective January 01, 2015;
c. the fee for an expedited service for vulnerable sector screenings within 72 hours be set at $110.00 per request for the purpose of employment, effective January 01, 2015; and
d. the fee for an expedited service for vulnerable sector screenings within 72 hours be set at $65.00 per request for volunteers, effective January 01, 2015.
2. City Council authorize the Toronto Police Services Board to charge the City of Toronto, including Agencies, Boards and Commissions, for all the applications that they submit to the Toronto Police Service – Police Reference Check Program for vulnerable sector screening checks. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee received the report (July 21, 2014) from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board for information. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Toronto – Executive Committee with the Toronto Police Services Board’s decision on the request to delay the implementation of charging City Divisions and Agencies fees for vulnerable sector screening checks until September 01, 2014 to allow City Divisions and Agencies and the Toronto Police Service time to develop administrative processes to track requests and reconcile charges. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Responding to Requests for Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks - Update on Fees to be Charged
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72099.pdf) |
| 48a | Toronto Police Services Board - Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks - Proposed Increase to Existing Fees, Establishment of New Fees and Charges to the City of Toronto |
| Origin |
| (August 15, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Toronto – Executive Committee with the decisions that have been made by the Toronto Police Services Board (“Board”) in order to provide the Toronto Police Service (“TPS”) with the ability to clear the current backlog of requests for vulnerable sector screening (“VSS”) checks, complete future VSS checks to within a two week timeline and apply an increase to existing fees or establish new fees for new services that will be implemented pertaining to the expedited completion of VSS checks. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks - Proposed Increase to Existing Fees, Establishment of New Fees and Charges to the City of Toronto
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72893.pdf) |
| EX44.50 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Toronto Transit Commission - 2013 Annual Human Rights Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the Toronto Transit Commission 2013 Annual Human Rights Report for information. |
| Origin |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission |
| Summary |
At its meeting on Tuesday, June 24, 2014 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the attached report entitled "2013 Annual Human Rights Report".
The Toronto Transit Commission Board adopted the recommendations in the staff report, as follows:
1. Receive this report for information purposes; and
2. Forward this report to City Council, through the Executive Committee, for information purposes.
The foregoing is submitted to the appropriate City of Toronto committee. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (June 27, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, on 2013 Annual Human Rights Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71441.pdf) (June 24, 2014) Report No. 8a from the Toronto Transit Commission on 2013 Annual Human Rights Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71442.pdf) |
| EX44.51 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Fostering Transit Innovation |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and the President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx to investigate and report back on the feasibility of establishing an ongoing forum for discussing transit planning and associated urban issues that draws upon regional, national and international best practices and innovation; membership could include, but not necessarily be limited to transportation and transit planning professionals from the City of Toronto and the surrounding regions, the Province, consultants, planning associations, academics, interested members of the public and elected officials. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Letter from City Council |
| Summary |
Transit plays a vital role in the day to day lives of the Torontonians. An effective transit system gives people the freedom to access all of what the City has to offer and enhances their opportunities for employment and education. It is a major determinant in the City's prosperity and shaping the City's growth as well as that of the surrounding region.
The City is on the verge of an expansion of transit infrastructure and services that is unprecedented. Notwithstanding this planned investment, much of the public discussion has focused on infrastructure choices and funding issues. More attention needs to be placed on fostering innovation to enhance transit services, and improve service delivery and inter-agency coordination, to improve the overall experience of transit users.
An ongoing public forum to discuss and debate the objective of improving transit service informed by industry best practices and innovations would benefit planners and decision makers as they establish priorities affecting the evolution of the transit system. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 14, 2014) Letter from City Council on Fostering Transit Innovation
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71470.pdf) |
| EX44.55 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Development Charge Complaint - 545-565 Sherbourne Street |
| Statutory - Development Charges Act, SO 1997 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council accept the complaint dated June 18, 2014 filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 regarding 545-565 Sherbourne Street.
2. City Council direct that a refund from Development Charges Reserves for the difference from the amount be paid to the complainant. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Executive Committee held a statutory hearing on August 20, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Development Charges Act. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
This report responds to a complaint filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 relating to a development project located at 545-565 Sherbourne Street.
The complainant claims that, on account of various administrative delays by the City, a building permit could not be drawn or issued prior to the increase in development charge rates that came into effect on February 1, 2014. A conditional permit was issued in May 2014 and development charges in the amount of $5,246,662 were collected; had a building permit been issued prior to February 1, 2014, applicable development charges would have been $4,247,436 (lower by $988,797).
After reviewing the complaint, staff has concluded that development charges payable were properly calculated at the time of building permit issuance and that there was no error in the application of the City's Development Charge By-law. This report recommends that the complaint be dismissed. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Development Charge Complaint - 545-565 Sherbourne Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72632.pdf) (June 18, 2014) Attachment 1 - Complaint letter from WeirFoulds, LLP (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72633.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Adam Brown, Counsel, Sherman Brown |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell (EX.New.EX44.55.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49543.pdf) (August 20, 2014) Submission from Adam Brown (EX.New.EX44.55.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49544.pdf) (August 20, 2014) Submission from Adam Brown (EX.New.EX44.55.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-49524.pdf) |
| EX44.56 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Recommendations from the Deputy Mayor's Roundtable on Gridlock and Traffic Congestion |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to collaborate with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter in 2015 on the planning/ implementation status of curbside management initiatives outlined in the City of Toronto Congestion Management Plan. Elements considered in the update report should include, but not be limited to, provisions for options to expedite measures that minimize the disruption of vehicular flow, while improving the ability for businesses and service providers to operate on Toronto's streets such as:
a. Designated pick-up/drop-off areas for goods and service vehicles;
b. Loading zones for people with disabilities;
c. Courier delivery zones;
d. Temporary film trailer parking; and
e. Motor coach parking zones.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter in 2015 on a strategy and financial implications to modernize and expand the existing traffic adaptive signal control system (SCOOT), included in the strategy a review of new technologies and methodologies are to be considered.
3. City Council request the General Manager , Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter in 2015 on the planning and/or implementation status of Construction Coordination initiatives outlined in the City of Toronto Congestion Management Plan. Elements considered in the update report should include, but not be limited to, provisions for options to expedite measures that improve the coordination and management of construction work zones and minimize the impact of work zones on traffic on Toronto's streets such as:
a. Electronic Lane Occupancy Permit Management system that streamlines the application, approval, receipt and management/tracking of lane occupancy permits;
b. Lane Occupancy Permit Review that reviews the cost of lane occupancy permits, fines and related contract conditions to ensure they reflect potential impacts on traffic, with the goal to speed up the work and shorten the disruptions to traffic flows; and
c. Work Zone Performance Management and Monitoring changes to contract requirements that require contractors to comply with the conditions of lane occupancy permits. Also, consider monitoring the traffic performance within the work zone and requiring the contractor to maintain specific levels of service throughout the day as a future enhancement.
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to provide an implementation status report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter in 2015 on the implementation of strategies designed to provide motorists with real-time information about incidents, volume and delays for the City's expressways and arterial roads. The update report should include, but not be limited to, provisions for options to expedite the procurement and installation of data-collecting cameras and associated devices on arterial roadways as a means of strengthening data sources and networks to ensure that information on current traffic conditions is accurate, reliable and readily available.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with relevant stakeholders such as the Toronto Police Service, Fire Services Division and Office of Emergency Management to undertake a review of the City's current practices in incident management related to the RESCU system and to report findings to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter in 2015, in an effort to reduce the number of incidents, reduce the recovery time from incidents, provide more and faster information to motorists about incidents and implement recommendations.
6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with stakeholder groups to further enhance the development and promotion of public education and marketing campaigns such as "Steer It, Clear It", which encourages motorists involved in a property damage-only collision on expressways to move their vehicles to a safe place, if possible.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to explore the feasibility of implementing roving service patrol vehicles along the Don Valley Parkway and Gardiner Expressway corridors to help motorists with minor mechanical breakdowns and to clear vehicles from travel lanes and to report findings to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2015.
8. City Council request City staff to continue to work with other orders of government, other municipalities and representatives from across the goods movement industry and the public to support this comprehensive multi-modal approach for the safe and efficient movement of goods within the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA).
9. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work with representatives of major events and festivals to explore ways to encourage greater use of public transit and report findings back to the Economic Development Committee in the second quarter in 2015. |
| Origin |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly, Councillor Michael Thompson and Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong |
| Summary |
One of the biggest challenges facing the City of Toronto and the surrounding region is gridlock. Businesses and residents across Toronto waste countless hours in traffic, which has resulted in an estimated productivity loss of over $6 billion annually. It is important that Toronto makes the right decisions to build transportation infrastructure that will reduce gridlock, move people quickly and improve productivity.
The attached report from the Deputy Mayor's Roundtable on Gridlock and Traffic Congestion summarizes the February 28, 2014 Gridlock and Traffic Congestion Roundtable meeting that we co-chaired.
A diverse group of over two dozen participants provided valuable input on how the City can address some of the issues related to the City's transportation networks. We are asking that the Executive Committee members adopt the recommendations within the report in order for Council to better manage traffic congestion to benefit travellers, businesses and the environment. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly, Councillor Michael Thompson and Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong on Deputy Mayor's Roundtable on Gridlock and Traffic Congestion
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72898.pdf) (August 20, 2014) Report and Recommendations from Deputy Mayor's Roundtable on Gridlock and Traffic Congestion (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72899.pdf) |
| EX44.58 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Report on Non-Renewable contracts for all Accountability Officers |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Manager to report back, through the Executive Committee, on the necessary amendments to Chapter 3, Accountability Officers, for the Ombudsman to be appointed for one 5 or 7 year term that does not include the possibility of extension. |
| Summary |
Accountability officers have a very important role to play in our legislative system; they help keep our elected officials honest and our system transparent. I believe we can strengthen the independence of our accountability officers by removing City Council's authority to interfere with the length of their tenure.
Toronto has recently hired an Integrity Commissioner and an Auditor General to non-renewable contracts. To ensure that the Ombudsman is equally free to criticize Councillors and the Mayor, that position's contract should also be non-renewable.
I want to make clear that this motion is not intended to impact the contract for the current Ombudsman. This recommendation will only effect the tenure of Toronto's next Ombusdman. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 20, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon on Request for Report on Non-Renewable Contracts for All Accountability Officers
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-72895.pdf) |
| Board of Health - Meeting 33 |
| HL33.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| E-cigarettes in Toronto |
| Communications HL33.1.27 to HL33.1.29 have been submitted on this Item |
| Board Recommendations |
The Board of Health recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit e-cigarette use from City of Toronto workplaces, and recommend the same to the City's Agencies and Corporations.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management to explore the environmentally sound disposal of e-cigarettes and batteries. |
| Board Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Board of Health:
1. Endorsed Toronto Public Health's public Position Statement on Electronic Cigarettes included in Attachment 1 of the report (August 1, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health;
2. Recommended that the Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care amend the Smoke-Free Ontario Act and Regulations to: a. prohibit e-cigarette use wherever smoking is prohibited; b. prohibit sales of youth-targeted flavoured e-cigarette products; and c. prohibit e-cigarette displays in retail stores and restrict sales of e-cigarettes to minors.
3. If the provincial government has not acted to regulate e-cigarettes within six months, requested the Medical Officer of Health to report in consultation with the City Solicitor and other municipal officials as appropriate, on municipal regulation to prohibit e-cigarette use in Toronto wherever smoking is currently prohibited under local or provincial legislation;
4. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to work in the interim with the City Manager to explore development of an administrative policy prohibiting e-cigarette use in the workplace;
5. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to enhance current public education and outreach efforts by Toronto Public Health on potential health impacts to users and those exposed to the vapour from e-cigarettes.
6. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to report to the Board of Health in February 2015 on the following motion by Councillor Cho:
"That the Board of Health recommend to the Provincial Government that e-cigarettes becomes a product available only at licensed drug stores, subject to normal regulatory approvals."
7. Recommended the Federal Minister of Health amend federal legislation to: a. regulate all e-cigarettes, cartridges and liquids to ensure manufacturing consistency and accurate labelling; b. regulate the maximum quantity/dosage of nicotine in e-cigarettes; c. require that e-cigarette liquids are sold in child-proof bottles; and d. restrict e-cigarette marketing, advertising and promotion, consistent with existing tobacco legislation; and e. develop, as appropriate, a regulatory framework for the possible sale of e-cigarettes as part of a tobacco smoking cessation strategy.
8. Requested Health Canada: a. to enforce current prohibitions on e-cigarettes making a health claim without appropriate assessment, evaluation and market authorization; and b. to monitor research on adverse health effects of e-cigarette use and second-hand exposure; and c. to conduct research on the effectiveness of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation or replacement aid.
9. Forwarded the report (August 1, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health to the four Toronto School Boards, Toronto's Universities and Colleges and Toronto Hospitals to encourage them to adopt policies prohibiting e-cigarette use on all indoor/outdoor property;
10. Forwarded the report to the Ontario Restaurant Hotel and Motel Association and Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas to encourage them to encourage their members to develop in-house policies to address e-cigarette use on their property;
11. Forwarded the report (August 1, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health for information to the Parks and Environment Committee; and
12. Forwarded the report (August 1, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health for information to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards Division; General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division; the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; the Minister of Health and Long Term Care; the Ontario Chief Medical Officer of Health; and Public Health Ontario. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health |
| Summary |
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are battery operated devices that mimic the use and sometimes the appearance and taste of conventional cigarettes. They do not contain tobacco and produce vapour instead of smoke when used. In the few years since their appearance, use has proliferated in North America, including Toronto.
Toronto Public Health (TPH) reviewed available evidence on e-cigarette use, safety, health effects, and potential as a cessation aid; as well as actions in other jurisdictions and regulatory gaps at the federal, provincial and municipal levels. Based on this review, a number of concerns have been identified about e-cigarette safety, impact on youth smoking initiation, and potential to normalize smoking behaviour and undermine existing tobacco control legislation. A number of Canadian and international jurisdictions have proposed or taken action to address these concerns. As a result, TPH has developed a position statement on e-cigarettes and health outlining current concerns and summarizing appropriate regulatory and policy approaches to address them.
This report recommends that the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care amend the Smoke-Free Ontario Act (SFOA) to include e-cigarettes, such that the Act would prohibit e-cigarette use wherever cigarette use is currently prohibited in Ontario; and prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes to minors (under 19 years of age). If provincial action is not taken by February 2015, the Medical Officer of Health will consult with the City Solicitor, other City Divisions and relevant stakeholders and report to the Board of Health on municipal measures to prohibit e-cigarette use where smoking is prohibited under the SFOA or City by-laws. In the interim, the Medical Officer of Health will work with the City Manager to explore development of an internal policy prohibiting e-cigarette use at City workplaces. This report also recommends SFOA amendments to address youth friendly e-cigarette flavours and amendments to federal legislation to ensure labelling and manufacturing consistency of e-cigarettes. |
| Background Information (Board) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on E-cigarettes in Toronto
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72510.pdf) (August 1, 2014) Attachment 1: Toronto Public Health Position Statement on Electronic Cigarettes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72511.pdf) (August 18, 2014) Presentation on E-cigarettes in Toronto (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72882.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Ron Couchman, Men for Equality and Non-Violence |
| Communications (Board) |
| (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Debbie MacKenzie (HL.New.HL33.1.1)
(August 13, 2014) E-mail from Samir Koirala (HL.New.HL33.1.2) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Sadie Chase (HL.New.HL33.1.3) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Matthew Stanko, Director of Communications, Canadian Advocating Vapers' Rights (CAVR) (HL.New.HL33.1.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49356.pdf) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Sean Rankin (HL.New.HL33.1.5) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Gopal Bhatnagar, M.D., FRCS, Cardiac Surgery (HL.New.HL33.1.6) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Kate Ackerman-Vance, Electronic Cigarette Trade Association of Canada (ECTA) (HL.New.HL33.1.7) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49359.pdf) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Robert Edison (HL.New.HL33.1.8) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Ashutosh Jha (HL.New.HL33.1.9) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Brinklow (HL.New.HL33.1.10) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Ken Schwantje (HL.New.HL33.1.11) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Darwin Duckworth (HL.New.HL33.1.12) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Carolyn Backes (HL.New.HL33.1.13) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Cheryl Thomas (HL.New.HL33.1.14) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Pierre B. Cherer (HL.New.HL33.1.15) (August 15, 2014) Petition from Jordan Vazquez, Reconsider Banning the Sale and Use of Electronic Cigarettes in Toronto, Submitting 1129 Names (HL.New.HL31.1.16) (August 18, 2014) Letter from Ron Couchman (HL.New.HL33.1.17) (August 16, 2014) E-mail from Marion Burt (HL.New.HL33.1.18) (August 16, 2014) E-mail from Mike T. Nicoloff (HL.New.HL33.1.19) (August 17, 2014) Letter from Tuck Stone (HL.New.HL33.1.20) (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Doug Sawdon (HL.New.HL33.1.21) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Toronto West Youth Coalition (HL.New.HL33.1.22) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49385.pdf) (August 18, 2014) Letter from Sara Trotta, Canadian Cancer Society (HL.New.HL33.1.23) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49481.pdf) (August 18, 2014) Letter from Melodie Tilson, Director of Policy, Non-Smoker's Rights Association (HL.New.HL33.1.24) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49482.pdf) (August 18, 2014) Letter from David Hammond PhD, Associate Professor, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo (HL.New.HL33.1.25) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49483.pdf) (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Dave Pittet (HL.New.HL33.1.26) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Manuel Orellana (CC.Main.HL33.1.27)
(August 18, 2014) E-mail from M. J. Moll (CC.Main.HL33.1.28) (August 19, 2014) Letter from France G?linas, MPP for Nickel Belt (CC.Main.HL33.1.29) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49528.pdf) |
| HL33.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Municipal Alcohol Policy: Review and Update |
| Communications HL33.3.1 and HL33.3.2 have been submitted on this Item |
| Board Recommendations |
The Board of Health recommends that:
1. City Council approve the revised Municipal Alcohol Policy included as Appendix B of the report (July 31, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health. |
| Board Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Board of Health:
1. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to establish an interdivisional task group including representation from the City Manager's Office, Corporate Finance – Insurance and Risk Management, Economic Development and Culture, Corporate Security, Facilities Management, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Divisions, and other appropriate City stakeholders to develop an implementation plan, communication strategy, and evaluation plan for the updated Municipal Alcohol Policy (MAP).
2. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to consider the use of alcometers where alcohol is served. |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto's Board of Health (BOH) requested the Medical Officer of Health (MOH) to work with relevant municipal divisions to update the City of Toronto's Municipal Alcohol Policy (MAP) in June 2011. The MAP reduces alcohol-related risks and promotes the health and safety of people at events on City owned and operated property by outlining the requirements for a responsible, managed approach to alcohol service. The last update of this policy occurred in March 2001, when the MAP was harmonized after municipal amalgamation. It is appropriate after more than a decade to review the policy to ensure it reflects current evidence on reducing alcohol-related harms and liabilities.
Toronto Public Health has completed a comprehensive review and analysis of the MAP, including consultations with municipal and external stakeholders. Based on the consultation findings, review of MAPs in other jurisdictions and a review of the health evidence on harms related to excessive alcohol consumption, this report recommends the Board of Health and City Council approve the revised MAP. Specifically, this report summarizes proposed enhancements to the existing MAP in relation to designation of properties and events, insurance requirements, safe transportation, signage, enforcement and monitoring of compliance. Further, TPH proposes that a short-term interdivisional task group be created to develop an implementation plan in order to communicate the changes effectively and monitor and evaluate the implementation of the updated policy. |
| Background Information (Board) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on the Municipal Alcohol Policy: Review and Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72531.pdf) Appendix A - Quality Measure assessment of existing Toronto MAP (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72532.pdf) Appendix B - Revised City of Toronto Municipal Alcohol Policy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72533.pdf) Appendix C - Comparison of Existing and Proposed Components of the Toronto Municipal Alcohol Policy (MAP) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72534.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Anthony Van Heyningen , Canadian Beverage Association |
| Communications (Board) |
| (August 15, 2014) Letter from Jim Goetz, President, Canadian Beverage Association (HL.New.HL33.3.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-49441.pdf) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Bryan (HL.New.HL33.3.2) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Don Cha, General Manager, Ontario Korean Businessman's Association (CC.New.HL33.3.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49607.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Letter from Christopher Roberts, Festival Director, North by North East (CC.New.HL33.3.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49623.pdf) |
| HL33.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Health Impacts of the City of Toronto's Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy |
| Items HL33.4, PW33.15 and PW33.16 will be considered together |
| Board Recommendations |
The Board of Health recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Water, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to develop the following options to improve the Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy, and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in early 2015:
a. Expand the distribution of free filters to vulnerable populations living in pre-1950s homes; and b. Develop and promote a publicly accessible database and/or map of the status of lead service lines; and c. Increase the number of complete replacement as part of the "planned" replacements program.
2. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Water, in collaboration with the Medical Officer of Health, to evaluate current public education and outreach efforts and implement enhancements as necessary to reduce exposures to lead in drinking water, particularly for those populations that are most at risk and report to the Board with any additional resource requirements prior to approval of the 2015 budget. |
| Board Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Board of Health:
1. Endorsed the following Recommendation (1) from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on August 13, 2014 (Item PW33.16)
"1. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to develop a self-funded loan program as described in the report (July 29, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, for City of Toronto homeowners wishing to replace lead water service connections situated on their properties."
2. Endorsed the following Recommendation (1) from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on August 13, 2014 (Item PW33.15)
"1. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to:
a. develop a targeted pilot project to identify, educate, encourage, and coordinate the replacement of private and public lead service pipes on streets with a significant number of homes with lead service, and report through the 2015 budget process with the potential costs of the project;
b. remove the "cap" on the number of "Priority" lead service replacements;
c. include in all future contracts for water service replacement contracts a requirement for maintaining records of private side replacements;
d. develop a system of data collection on completion rates and outstanding lead services in the City of Toronto; and
e. examine and implement changes in the "planned" and "priority" replacements process to coordinate the work to replace public and private replacements at the same time."
3. Requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with Toronto Water to develop a targeted pilot project to identify, educate, encourage and coordinate the complete replacement (public and private) on streets with a significant number of homes with lead service.
4. Requested the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change to direct the Ontario Drinking Water Advisory Council to review and provide a recommendation on updating the Drinking Water Quality Standard for lead to ensure it is adequately protective of health; and
5. Forwarded the report (July 31, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Public Health Ontario, Toronto Catholic District School Board, Toronto District School Board, Conseil scolaire Viamonde, Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre-Sud, Toronto Real Estate Board and Health Canada. |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health |
| Summary |
Lead exposure is associated with neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, renal, and reproductive effects. Lead adversely affects those that are most vulnerable in our society: infants, children and pregnant women. While exposures to lead continue to decrease in the general population, studies show that remaining exposures to lead should be minimized or eliminated whenever possible. Reducing lead in drinking water is considered to be one of the most feasible and least expensive options available to reduce exposures to lead.
This report provides a summary of recent research on the health impacts of lead in drinking water. An overview of lead levels and protocols with respect to school drinking water is also provided. Lead components exist in both the public and private side of the drinking water system and there are important actions that both the City and the public should take to reduce exposures. This report provides an update on the City's efforts to engage and encourage the public to take actions to mitigate exposure to lead in drinking water.
Research shows that homeowners are more likely to take action to reduce their exposures to lead in drinking water when their drinking water is found to be in excess of the drinking water quality standard. Ontario's drinking water quality standard should be reviewed to ensure it reflects current understanding of the health impacts of lead exposure and that it is protective of the most vulnerable in our society.
This report provides an assessment of the health impacts of the City of Toronto's Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy and provides options and recommendations for additional actions the City can take to further reduce risks from exposure to lead in drinking water. |
| Background Information (Board) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on the Health Impacts of the City of Toronto's Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72536.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Janet Davis |
| Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 31 |
| CD31.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Authorization to Certify and Approve Quality Improvement Plans |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services, to certify and approve on behalf of the City annual Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) for submission to Health Quality Ontario (HQO) as required under the Excellent Care for All Act, 2010. |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services |
| Summary |
In December 2013, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care issued a directive requiring the development and public availability of Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) from all long-term care (LTC) homes in Ontario for each fiscal year (April 1 – March 31) beginning in 2015/16. These plans must also be submitted to Health Quality Ontario (HQO) as part of the organization's mandate under the Excellent Care for All Act, 2010.
A Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) is a formal, documented set of commitments that a healthcare organization makes to its patients/clients/residents, staff and community to improve quality through focused targets and actions. QIPs are used in other healthcare sectors such as hospitals to assist in delivering quality programs and services. In order to support a common vision across the health system, standardized templates are provided for the QIP by HQO with the expectation that the Chair of the Board (or designate) certify their approval of the plan.
The purpose of this report is to request that authority be delegated to the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services (LTCHS) to certify and approve on behalf of the City annual QIPs for submission to HQO as required under the Excellent Care for All Act, 2010. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services on the Request for Authorization to Certify and Approve Quality Improvement Plans
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72460.pdf) |
| CD31.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Award of Request for Proposal No. 3810-13-0056 to Mine Safety Appliances Company (MSA), for the Supply of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and Related Components for use by Toronto Fire Services (TFS) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, to award a contract to, and to negotiate, enter into and execute on behalf of the City an agreement not to exceed a total value of $7,076,349.33 net of HST recoveries, with Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) Company for the supply of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus and related components, for a period of fifteen (15) years, from date of award to July 31, 2029, in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor. |
| Origin |
| (August 8, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the results of the RFP to select an appropriate brand of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and related components, for use by Toronto Fire Services (TFS) and City divisions and to request authority to enter into an agreement with Mine Safety Appliances Company (MSA) to provide parts supply, service, and warranty support for the SCBA units and related components for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of the award to July 31, 2029.
The RFP complied with the purchasing policies and as indicated in the report, Attachment 1, a Fairness Monitor was engaged to monitor the RFP and attest to the fairness and openness of the procurement process. Mine Safety Appliance Company (MSA) had the lowest cost of services and the highest overall score; as a result, Toronto Fire Services staff recommends that this proponent be awarded the Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and related components Contract. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 8, 2014) Revised Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on the Award of Request for Proposal No. 3810-13-0056 to Mine Safety Appliances Company (MSA), for the Supply of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and related Components for use by Toronto Fire Services (TFS)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72810.pdf) (July 25, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on the Award of Request for Proposal No. 3810-13-0056 to Mine Safety Appliances Company (MSA), for the Supply of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and related Components for use by Toronto Fire Services (TFS) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72355.pdf) (June 12, 2014) Attachment 1 - Attestation Report from JD Campbell and Associates (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72357.pdf) |
| CD31.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Sole-Sourced Essential Medical Services - Toronto Fire Services |
| Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees. The security of the property of the municipality or local board. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 of the report (July 22, 2014) from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, and authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services to negotiate and execute an agreement on behalf of the City of Toronto, for the supply of essential medical services, in accordance with confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1; and
2. City Council authorize the release of the confidential information and recommendations in Attachment 1 of the report (July 22, 2014) from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, upon the negotiation and final execution of an agreement for the supply of essential medical services. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services |
| Summary |
This report recommends authorizing of a new contract for the continued supply of essential medical services to Toronto Fire Services (TFS). The proposed supplier of essential medical services has specific expertise in emergency medicine, specialized knowledge of the needs of TFS and the physical demands related to firefighting and other functions at TFS. The specific expertise and specialized knowledge is of paramount importance to TFS as it plays a key role in the operation of numerous TFS programs. Provision of these services permits TFS to both continue with and expand the operation of various health and safety, attendance management and return to work programs. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on the Sole-Sourced Essential Medical Services - Toronto Fire Services
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-71695.pdf) (July 15, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 - Sole-Sourced Essential Medical Services - Toronto Fire Services |
| CD31.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15, 21 |
| Update on the Relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter |
| Communications CD31.7.98 to CD31.7.108 have been submitted on this Item |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the permanent relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter at 616 Vaughan Road in accordance with the requirement of the Municipal Shelter By-law 138-2003, subject to Cornerstone Place providing a business case that demonstrates the viability of the shelter's operations at the new location, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to convene a community working group facilitated by a third party including local residents, agency staff, clients, and City staff to work with the community agency and the City on the shelter's transition to the proposed location and to refine the shelter service model.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration, to work with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, effective immediately, and report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on the social-economic, health and community planning resources needed to support Cornerstone Place Shelter and the local neighbourhood stakeholders with the relocation.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee by March, 2015 with recommendations for an "Oakwood Vaughan Strategy" to improve economic development, social services and land-use planning for the neighbourhood to address issues of high unemployment, petty crime, and lack of economic development, the Strategy to:
a. Be developed in coordination with relevant city agencies and divisions, including the Toronto Public Library, Toronto Public Health and Toronto Police; b. Make recommendations to provide adequate funding for the plan; and c. Be developed through a robust community engagement process that is inclusive of local residents and businesses.
5. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing to develop an operating agreement with Cornerstone that addresses issues of concern to the Oakwood Vaughan community, such as hours of operation, entrance and exit procedures, and noise. |
| Origin |
| (July 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration |
| Summary |
Cornerstone Place is a 50-bed men's purchase of service shelter that has been located at 833 St. Clair Avenue West in Ward 21 since 2001. It has had to suspend its operations by July 31, 2014 as the organization's lease was up. The property was sold to a developer in July 2012 who is now commencing work on the site. A proposed new location has been identified at 616 Vaughan Road in Ward 15, which requires Council approval in order to proceed.
Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) is working in cooperation with the local ward councillor to conduct community outreach and consultation with area residents. An open community meeting was held on July 28, 2014 to discuss the planned shelter location, answer residents' questions, and listen to their concerns.
In order to ensure service continuity for Cornerstone's residents, SSHA and Cornerstone developed in partnership a transition plan for them. The residents have been provided with housing supports or have been placed in available beds within the rest of the men's shelter system. SSHA has also been developing a plan in partnership with the agency to support Cornerstone Place Shelter staff until the shelter is able to re-open at the proposed new location. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Update on the Relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72467.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Ian Lipton |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (July 26, 2014) E-mail from Jamie Okorofsky (CD.Supp.CD31.7.1)
(July 26, 2014) Letter from Angela Sanelli (CD.Supp.CD31.7.2) (July 28, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Tarr (CD.Supp.CD31.7.3) (July 28, 2014) E-mail from Ian and Laura Conway (CD.Supp.CD31.7.4) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Bruno Da Silva (CD.Supp.CD31.7.5) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Julia Lalande (CD.Supp.CD31.7.6) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from David Han (CD.Supp.CD31.7.7) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Liz McGurrin (CD.Supp.CD31.7.8) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Noah Buchman (CD.Supp.CD31.7.9) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Claudia Fleischer (CD.Supp.CD31.7.10) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Diane Yee (CD.Supp.CD31.7.11) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Maria Parise (CD.Supp.CD31.7.12) (July 30, 2014) Letter from Ilia Sapojnikov (CD.Supp.CD31.7.13) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Mark Lipton (CD.Supp.CD31.7.14) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Huaci Jin (CD.Supp.CD31.7.15) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Louis Simao (CD.Supp.CD31.7.16) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Ann Tuzi (CD.Supp.CD31.7.17) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from David Evans (CD.Supp.CD31.7.18) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Marcial Velasco (CD.Supp.CD31.7.19) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Tal Batalion (CD.Supp.CD31.7.20) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Cohen (CD.Supp.CD31.7.21) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Tom Bianchi (CD.Supp.CD31.7.22) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Robert Bell (CD.Supp.CD31.7.23) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Segal (on behalf of 1865646 Ontario Incorporated) (CD.Supp.CD31.7.24) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Catherine and Jason Borovoy (CD.Supp.CD31.7.25) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Ashley Mathew (CD.Supp.CD31.7.26) (August 1, 2014) Letter from Arthur Gee and Karen Yee (CD.Supp.CD31.7.27) (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Jonathan Kleiman (CD.Supp.CD31.7.28) (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Marianne Ono (CD.Supp.CD31.7.29) (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Suzy Batista (CD.Supp.CD31.7.30) (August 2, 2014) E-mail from Catherine Demajo (CD.Supp.CD31.7.31) (August 2, 2014) E-mail from Monica Mitchell-Taylor (CD.Supp.CD31.7.32) (July 29, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Caetano (CD.Supp.CD31.7.33) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Risse (CD.Supp.CD31.7.34) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer McKay (CD.Supp.CD31.7.35) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Luisa Salerno (CD.Supp.CD31.7.36) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Cindy Beman (CD.Supp.CD31.7.37) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Esmenia Faustino (CD.Supp.CD31.7.38) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Justin Silva (CD.Supp.CD31.7.39) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Carmela Starr (CD.Supp.CD31.7.40) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Stella Emmanuel (CD.Supp.CD31.7.41) (August 8, 2014) Letter from Cathy Crowe, RN, BAAN, M.Ed. (CD.Supp.CD31.7.42) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Shelley Kanitz (CD.Supp.CD31.7.43) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Henry Hwang, RN (CD.Supp.CD31.7.44) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Dan Greenstein (CD.Supp.CD31.7.45) (August 1, 2014) Petition from Oakwood Village Community Association, Oppose the Relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter to 616 Vaughan Road, submitting 627 signatures (CD.Supp.CD31.7.46) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Nada Thomson (CD.Supp.CD31.7.47) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Samantha Goldsilver (CD.Supp.CD31.7.48) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from David Clipsham (CD.Supp.CD31.7.49) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Steve Nightingale (CD.New.CD31.7.50) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Stephanie Shymko (CD.New.CD31.7.51) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Lincoln Lo and Jennifer Morrison (CD.New.CD31.7.52) (August 13, 2014) Letter from Ruth Gillson, Executive Director, Toronto Hostels Training Centre (CD.New.CD31.7.53) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-49295.pdf) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Amanda Rothschild (CD.New.CD31.7.54) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Vanessa Mariga (CD.New.CD31.7.55) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Sue Sneyd (CD.New.CD31.7.56) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Nancy Furlong (CD.New.CD31.7.57) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Steve Lurie, Executive Director, Canadian Mental Health Association, Toronto Branch (CD.New.CD31.7.58) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-49305.pdf) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Allyson Switzman (CD.New.CD31.7.59) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Cheri Faris (CD.New.CD31.7.60) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Dorothy Jelen (CD.New.CD31.7.61) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Andy Parmenter (CD.New.CD31.7.62) (August 13, 2014) Letter from Kenton Kroker (CD.New.CD31.7.63) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from John Maiorano (CD.New.CD31.7.64) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Debra Boyce (CD.New.CD31.7.65) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Isacc Bonilla and Family (CD.New.CD31.7.66) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Joseph Sciabbarrasi (CD.New.CD31.7.67) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Carmelo Duca (CD.New.CD31.7.68) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Trish Lenz (CD.New.CD31.7.69) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Elijah Augustus (CD.New.CD31.7.70) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Scott Augustus (CD.New.CD31.7.71) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Joan Malcolm-Husbands (CD.New.CD31.7.72) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Rossana Guglietti (CD.New.CD31.7.73) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Colin Husbands (CD.New.CD31.7.74) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Jorge Stathos (CD.New.CD31.7.75) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Joan Malcolm-Husbands (CD.New.CD31.7.76) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Rev. Dr. Gene Archer, Senior Pastor of the Pilgrim Church of the Firstborn/Toronto (CD.New.CD31.7.77) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Dan Greenstein (CD.New.CD31.7.78) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Amina Jabbar (CD.New.CD31.7.79) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler (CD.New.CD31.7.80) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Rev. Selvin Sitcheron, Pastor of "The Bibleway Christian Tabernacle" and the Board Vice-chair of Cornerstone Place (CD.New.CD31.7.81) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer Skeete (CD.New.CD31.7.82) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Bobbi Jo Quigley (CD.New.CD31.7.83) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Julia Lalande (CD.New.CD31.7.84) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Asheley Mathew (CD.New.CD31.7.85) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Lyba Spring (CD.New.CD31.7.86) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Carl Carty (CD.New.CD31.7.87) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Jonathan Reid (CD.New.CD31.7.88) (August 13, 2014) Letter from Michael A. Leitold (CD.New.CD31.7.89) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Bill Worrell (CD.New.CD31.7.90) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Tracey Low and Mason Sher (CD.New.CD31.7.91) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Marta Kennedy (CD.New.CD31.7.92) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Beppi Crosariol (CD.New.CD31.7.93) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from David Keith (CD.New.CD31.7.94) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Lyn Adamson (CD.New.CD31.7.95) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Arthur Gee and Karen Yee (CD.New.CD31.7.96) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Charlene Nolan (CD.New.CD31.7.97) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 14, 2014) Letter from Claudia De Simone (CC.Main.CD31.7.98)
(August 15, 2014) E-mail from Michael Hong (CC.Main.CD31.7.99) (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Huaci Jin (CC.Main.CD31.7.100) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Vanessa Mariga (CC.New.CD31.7.101) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Anna Sottile (CC.New.CD31.7.102) (August 24, 2014) Letter from Andrea K. Wobick, Ursel Phillips Fellows Hopkinson LLP (CC.New.CD31.7.103) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49594.pdf) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Oriella Rei Stillo (CC.New.CD31.7.104) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Violet Pucsek (CC.New.CD31.7.105) (August 27, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Ross (CC.New.CD31.7.106) (August 27, 2014) E-mail from Anna Sottile (CC.New.CD31.7.107) (August 20, 2014) Letter from Rev. Patrick Reid, Executive Director, Cornerstone Place submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's (CC.New.CD31.7.108) (August 25, 2014) Petition from Councillor Josh Colle, Ward 15, Eglinton-Lawrence, containing the names of approximately 1,059 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New) (August 25, 2014) Petition from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's, containing the names of approximately 217 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New) |
| CD31.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Youth Lounge Implementation |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to expand the Youth Lounge Advisory Committee to be reflective and inclusive of the diversity of youth experiences in Toronto.
2. City Council direct the Youth Lounges Advisory Committee to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the youth outreach strategy in the first quarter of 2015. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee:
1. Directed the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee at its first meeting in 2015:
a. with a youth lounges evaluation plan; b. with a more detailed staffing model and programming budget breakdown; and c. on how money will be reallocated due to two-month delay in opening the youth lounges. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
City Council adopted the City of Toronto's 2013-2017 Recreation Service Plan in November 2012. The Recreation Service Plan will guide the City of Toronto's planning and delivery of recreation programs and services through 2017.
An Implementation Plan was approved in July 2013 with a subsequent Youth Recreation Engagement Strategy approved in October 2013 to guide planning for youth services and programs. The Community Development and Recreation Committee approved the Recreation Services for Youth: Expansion of Youth Spaces report in December 2013 for consideration during the 2014 Operating Budget process. The report outlined a Community Recreation based youth lounge model based on the St. Stephens Community House approach. This model includes a space dedicated to youth, designed to create a welcoming environment with a program that operates five days a week with dedicated, consistent staff and programmed for youth interests including sports, arts, media and leadership.
The addition of ten Community Recreation youth lounges based on the enhanced model was approved in the 2014 Operating Budget with a three year phase-in plan for implementation; four sites were approved in 2014; three sites in 2015 and the final three in 2016.
This report provides an update on the implementation of the four sites for September 2014 and the establishment of the Youth Lounge Advisory Committee as directed by City Council to provide input on the start-up and operation of the youth spaces. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on the Youth Lounge Implementation
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72457.pdf) Appendix A: Youth Lounge Advisory Committee Membership List (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72458.pdf) Appendix B: Youth Lounge Advisory Committee Terms of Reference (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72459.pdf) |
| CD31.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27, 28 |
| Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan as described in Appendix 1 of the report (July 30, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Director Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Community Development and Recreation Committee:
1. Directed the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration to provide a report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the status of the key milestones of the Action Plan in the second quarter of 2015.
2. Directed the Director of Real Estate Services to work with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on supporting the Local Housing Strategy Key Action by identifying real estate opportunities with the intent of increasing rental and affordable housing stock in the Downtown East area.
3. Directed the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration to explore opportunities within the academic community to study the baselines and impacts of the implementation of the Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan. |
| Origin |
| (July 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
On December 20, 2012, City Council adopted the Downtown East (DTE) Revitalization Initiatives - Status Report that provided a status update on the Downtown East Revitalization Initiatives within the area bounded by Jarvis Street, Sherbourne Street, Queen Street East, and Carlton Street.
This follow up report outlines the Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan based on community consultation and City staff engagement.
The Action Plan includes 22 actions across 6 revitalizations themes. The purpose of the DTE Action Plan is to guide local reinvestment and redevelopment while simultaneously strengthening social infrastructure.
This approach will build on existing community services and infrastructure development actions of City divisions and community partners already underway. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on the Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72470.pdf) (July 30, 2014) Appendix 1: Downtown East Revitalization Action Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-72471.pdf) |
| Economic Development Committee - Meeting 33 |
| ED33.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| The Village of Islington Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion |
| Bills 908 and 909 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council designate the area described by Attachment No. 1 in the report (July 14, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture as the expanded Village of Islington Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 in this report as the expanded Village of Islington Business Improvement Area.
3. City Council grant the City Solicitor authority to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as necessary to reflect the expanded boundaries of The Village of Islington Business Improvement Area. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend a minor expansion of The Village of Islington Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundary including City owned lands within a portion of the Six Points interchange reconfiguration south west of the current BIA boundary to Bloor Street. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on The Village of Islington Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-71694.pdf) |
| ED33.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Mimico By The Lake Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion |
| Bills 906 and 907 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committeee recommends that:
1. City Council designate the area described by Attachment No. 1 in the report (July 15, 2014) as the amended Mimico By The Lake Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 in this report as a Business Improvement Area.
3. City Council grant the City Solicitor authority to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as necessary to reflect the expanded boundaries of the Mimico By The Lake Business Improvement Area. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to recommend a minor expansion of the Mimico By The Lake Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundary to include the City-owned and Toronto Region Conservation Authority parklands south of the BIA between Douglas Boulevard to the Humber Bay Park West Trail. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Mimico By The Lake Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-71693.pdf) |
| ED33.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22, 26 |
| Intention to Designate the Proposed Bayview Leaside Business Improvement Area (BIA) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the area described by Attachment No.1 in the report (July 7, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture as the Bayview Leaside Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
2. City Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to send out a notice of City Council’s intention to pass a by-law designating the area described by Attachment No. 1 in this report as a Business Improvement Area (BIA), in accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
3. City Council request the Executive Director of Technical Services to prepare designation by-law maps of the area as described by Attachment No. 1 in this report, and submit them to the City Solicitor. |
| Origin |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture |
| Summary |
This report recommends that the City Clerk conduct a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the area along Bayview Avenue, between Davisville Avenue on the south and Soudan Avenue on the north, as the Bayview Leaside Business Improvement Area (BIA).
Upon completion of the poll, the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture will report on the results to City Council through the Economic Development Committee. Subject to a positive poll result, staff shall prepare the necessary by-laws and bills to give effect thereto. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 7, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Intention to Designate the Proposed Bayview Leaside Business Improvement Area (BIA)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-71671.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow (ED.New.ED33.4.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/comm/communicationfile-49501.pdf) |
| ED33.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Deputy Mayor's Black Business Professionals Roundtable Summary Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
With respect to Procurement:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with the Purchasing and Materials Management Division to consult with the participants of the Black Business Professionals Roundtable to educate and build awareness about the City's procurement process and to receive feedback on the City's procurement process.
With respect to Informing Members of the Business Community on City Services:
2. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to develop a proactive public education and awareness program to increase the awareness of the business community on relevant City services and programs that are offered to aid businesses and to report back on the progress of the awareness program in the first quarter of 2015.
With respect to Outreach initiatives:
3. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to perform more community outreach initiatives, such as information events and skills development workshops, designed to inform the business community of City services designed to assist businesses.
4. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services to explore the feasibility of creating a business professionals mentorship program as a means of offering guidance, support and relationship building opportunities.
5. City Council request the Director, Equity, Diversity and Human Rights, in consultation with the City Manager, to examine the feasibility of adding a sixth award to the Access Equity and Human Rights annual award series which would recognize large companies comprised of an employee base which accurately reflects the racial, cultural and gender composition of the City of Toronto and the local community they reside in. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee. |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee |
| Summary |
All of Toronto's business professionals must be supported and empowered. In order to promote professional excellence, decision makers in Toronto must facilitate access to business support programs and resources. This will help create a better business climate in the City of Toronto and ensure businesses have the opportunity to thrive.
The attached Deputy Mayor's Black Business Professionals Roundtable report summarizes the May 12, 2014 Black Business Professionals Roundtable meeting that we co-chaired. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee on Black Business Professionals' Roundtable Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72674.pdf) Attachment 1 - Deputy Mayor's Black Business Professionals' Roundtable Summary Report - May 12, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72675.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly |
| ED33.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Deputy Mayor's Manufacturing Roundtable Summary Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to formally request the CEO of Hydro One; the General Manager of Toronto Water; the CEO of Toronto Hydro; and the CEO of Enbridge Gas, in consultation with Deputy City Manager Cluster B, to examine more timely and pervasive methods to inform businesses within employment lands of routine utility shut offs, the duration of the shut off, and reasons as to why the shut off is occurring.
2. City Council provide standing direction to City Legal and appropriate City staff to appeal decisions of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board which do not conform with the Official Plan's Employment Areas policies.
3. City Council continue to protect lands, designated Employment Areas, by maintaining the designations it approved when it considered the Five Year Review of the Official Plan, which is reflected in Official Plan Amendment No. 231.
4. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services, in consultation with the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, to report to the Economic Development and Culture Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on the development of a strategy that would foster collaboration between the manufacturing sector and local post-secondary educational institutions with the goal of filling labour market needs – both now and in the future.
5. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services to report to the Economic Development and Culture Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on the feasibility of extending the Partnership to Advance Youth Employment Program (PAYE) to the manufacturing sector.
6. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services to write to the appropriate Ontario and Federal government counterparts advocating for more informative labour market data in order to better match skills to jobs. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee. |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee |
| Summary |
The manufacturing sector is an essential part of our local economy. While manufacturing in the City of Toronto, as elsewhere, has seen a decline, it remains an important component of Toronto's economic landscape. Toronto's manufacturing firms employ about 120,000 people, representing nine per cent of Toronto's total employment. Manufacturing creates quality jobs and has high economic multipliers. A thriving manufacturing sector is a key component of a strong and balanced economy.
The attached Deputy Mayor's Manufacturing Roundtable report summarizes the June 3, 2014 Manufacturing Roundtable meeting that we co-chaired. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee on Deputy Mayor's Manufacturing Roundtable Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72681.pdf) Attachment 1 - Deputy Mayor's Manufacturing Roundtable Summary Report - June 3, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72683.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly |
| ED33.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Deputy Mayor's Innovation and Technology Summary Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
With respect to Supporting Major 3rd Party Tech Sector Events and Initiatives:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with other relevant city divisions, to study the feasibility of further promoting and supporting major 3rd party tech sector events and initiatives that:
a. promote and build upon the City's brand as a global tech hub;
b. facilitate employment opportunities or career advancement opportunities for tech sector professionals within the City;
c. provide a positive economic impact for the City; and
d. outside of the provision of staff support and existing City resources, do not require any financial commitment from the City
The General Manager of Economic Development and Culture be requested to report findings to the Economic Development and Culture Committee in the second quarter of 2015.
With respect to Measuring the effectiveness of City Incubators and Accelerators:
2. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with relevant City divisions to examine and review the effectiveness and measurable impacts of City-supported incubators and accelerators and to report findings back to the Economic Development Committee in the second Quarter of 2015.
With respect to Access to Capital:
3. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to explore opportunities to educate and build awareness for tech sector start-ups to access capital – particularly the first $0-$50,000 and to update the Economic Development and Culture Committee on these actions in the second quarter of 2015.
With respect to Fiber optic system:
4. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer and all other relevant City divisions, to conduct a study of Toronto's fiber-optic network in relation to some of the world's leading technology sector hubs and, if necessary, to outline the steps required to improve upon Toronto's fiber optic network.
With respect to No-fee wireless Internet access:
5. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer, to explore options to both directly and indirectly increase the amount of no-fee wireless Internet access throughout the City of Toronto.
6. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the City Manager, to explore the feasibility of creating the City of Toronto Office of the Chief Technology Commissioner. The mandate of the Chief Technology Commissioner would include, but not be limited to:
a. building a more conducive environment for nurturing start-ups, organizations and individuals within the tech community
b. organizing and maintaining an industry steering committee that work to promote and expand Toronto's tech sector
c. modernizing digital infrastructure and advocating for and facilitating greater accessibility of internet and fiber optic connectivity City-wide. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee. |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee |
| Summary |
The technology sector is an essential component of Toronto's economic vitality and success. There are about 11,500 tech firms located in the Toronto Region, which employ over 178,000 people. This accounts for about 60% of the total tech sector employment in Ontario. The industry is also an economic driver for virtually all other sectors of Toronto's economy, including: financial services, life science, renewable energy, film & television, digital media and advanced manufacturing.
The attached Deputy Mayor's Innovation and Technology Roundtable report summarizes the June 23, 2014 Innovation and Technology Roundtable meeting that we co-chaired. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee on Deputy Mayor's Innovation and Technology Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72684.pdf) Attachment 1 - Deputy Mayor's Innovation and Technology Summary Report - June 23, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72685.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly |
| ED33.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Deputy Mayor's Young Entrepreneurs Roundtable Summary Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
With respect to Promoting Young Entrepreneurs and Recognizing Excellence:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with the relevant divisions to celebrate the successes of Toronto's young entrepreneurs by publishing and promoting a list of Toronto's most exciting 10 young entrepreneurs under the age of 40. The list shall be developed by the Young Entrepreneurs Advisory Committee and promoted through the City's various Strategic Communications channels. An update presentation will be delivered to the Economic Development Committee in the second quarter of 2015.
2. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with relevant City divisions to explore the feasibility of celebrating the successes of Toronto's top young entrepreneurs through an annual awards ceremony and to report these findings to the Economic Development Committee in the second quarter of 2015.
3. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with the Toronto Office of Partnerships, the Toronto Region Board of Trade, Tourism Toronto and the Chief Information Officer to explore the feasibility of hosting an International Entrepreneurs Festival and to report back on these findings in the second quarter of 2015.
With respect to Access to Capital:
4. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with relevant City divisions to consult with the young entrepreneurial community and explore possible City initiatives designed to help young entrepreneurs gain access to capital. Some options may include, but not be limited to:
a. Promoting events that provide young entrepreneurs with opportunities to gain venture capital
b. Opportunities for the City to co-invest in start-ups with the private sector in lieu of providing grants
With respect to Partnership Opportunities:
5. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with the Toronto Office of Partnerships, Toronto Region Board of Trade, Tourism Toronto and the Chief Information Officer to explore partnership opportunities with Toronto's entrepreneurial community and ways in which the City can support and promote them.
6. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with Enterprise Toronto and Toronto Employment and Social Services Division to develop mentorship opportunities for current and aspiring young entrepreneurs as a means of instilling confidence in young entrepreneurs, providing them with a base of support and building a practical foundation of knowledge. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee. |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee |
| Summary |
Over 100,000 businesses are started in Ontario each year, with youth entering the marketplace at three times the rate of entrepreneurs over the age of 45. Toronto's young entrepreneurs are creative and ensure we maintain a constant source of economic renewal and diversification. When entrepreneurs thrive, the City thrives.
The attached Deputy Mayor's Young Entrepreneurs Roundtable report summarizes the July 16, 2014 Young Entrepreneurs Roundtable meeting that we co-chaired. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee on Deputy Mayor's Young Entrepreneurs Roundtable Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72686.pdf) Attachment 1 - Deputy Mayor's Young Entrepreneurs Roundtable Summary Report - July 16, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72687.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly |
| ED33.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Support for an Ontario Installation and Presence at Expo 2015 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Economic Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the President and CEO of Invest Toronto, to write letters to the Province of Ontario, endorsing the existence of an Ontario Pavilion in Milan at Expo 2015.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report on the ways in which the City of Toronto can participate in an Ontario Installation at Expo 2015, no later than the January meeting of the Economic Development Committee. |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Letter from Councillor Shelley Carroll |
| Summary |
The Italian Chamber of Commerce of Ontario (ICCO) has submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Tourism and Culture for financial support for Ontario to set up a booth or pavilion in Milan at Expo 2015. The Commissioner General of the Italian Pavilion for Expo 2015, has also offered space in the Italian Pavilion for a week in July for a Canada Day celebration.
Supporting both of these initiatives to have a Canadian presence in Milan will help demonstrate that there is Canadian Support for Expo. This is of vital importance as Toronto continues to consider a bid to host the 2025 World Expo.
It is important that City Council via the Economic Development Committee as well as Invest Toronto, provide letters that clearly support both of these proposals. Additionally, the City of Toronto needs to begin to consider the specific ways in which to participate in Expo 2015 to raise our Municipal profile and presence at World Expo. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 28, 2014) Letter from Councillor Shelley Carroll on Support for an Ontario Installation and Presence at Expo 2015
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-72443.pdf) |
| Government Management Committee - Meeting 32 |
| GM32.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Apportionment of Property Taxes - August 11, 2014 Hearing |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A and Appendix B to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Treasurer, under the columns entitled "Apportioned Tax" and "Apportioned Phase In/Capping". |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer |
| Summary |
The process of redistributing outstanding property taxes from one parcel of land to many newly created properties following a severance or re-development of land is referred to as “the apportionment of taxes”.
This report deals with 28 tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendices A and B (attached).
The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and / or property owners may express any concerns. Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.
Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Apportionment of Property Taxes - August 11, 2014 Hearing
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71711.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Appendix A - Apportionment Report - Taxpayer Initiated Tax Apportionments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71712.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Appendix B - Apportionment Report - Treasurer Initiated Tax Apportionments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71713.pdf) |
| GM32.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - August 11, 2014 Hearing |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to Section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix A attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Treasurer, excluding the following applications:
2. In the matter of the application for a tax cancellation, reduction or refund for the property known as 52 Shaver Avenue South, should an appeal of Council's decision be made to the Assessment Review Board by the property owner, City Council direct that the City, as party to the appeal, will not oppose the appellant seeking a higher assessment reduction for the building portion of the property.
3. City Council direct that the tax reduction identified in the report (July 22, 2014) from the Treasurer in the amount of $568.54 for the property known as 52 Shaver Avenue South be processed and applied to the tax account, following Council's approval of the Government Management Committee's recommendations.
4. City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) identified in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix B to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Treasurer. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer |
| Summary |
This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA). Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in use. Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.
The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where applicants may make a submission in defence of their position. Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.
Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - August 11, 2014 Hearing
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71726.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA, Hearing 2014H4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71727.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA, Hearing 2014H4 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71728.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Alisa Chaly |
| GM32.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Amendments to Chapter 767 of the Municipal Code, Taxation, Property Tax |
| Bill 960 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council delegate to the Government Management Committee the authority to hold meetings at which applicants can make representations to the committee and to make the final decision with respect to various municipal tax applications under sections 300, 322, 323(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), and (h), 325, 326 and 327 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (the "Act").
2. City Council delegate to the Treasurer, in his or her sole discretion, and in consultation with the City Solicitor to:
a. initiate property assessment appeals on behalf of the City by filing the necessary documentation with the applicable tribunal or court, if the Treasurer is satisfied that one or more of the following conditions approved by City Council at its meeting held on January 31, February 1 and 2, 2006 are met:
i. the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) has acknowledged the error, and has indicated that the problem cannot be resolved through a request for reconsideration, minutes of settlement between the Assessment Review Board, MPAC, the City, and the property owner, or through omitted/supplementary assessments;
ii. the assessed value as returned on the assessment roll is considered to be undervalued by more than 25 percent and a successful appeal decision is likely to result in an increase in the assessed value of $1,000,000 or greater;
iii. the decision to appeal the assessment value is likely to result in revenue to the City of $100,000 or more or have precedent-setting implications on similarly-valued properties or property types; and,
iv. the assessed value or classification is incorrect or inequitable in relation to other similar properties or property types.
b. participate in any assessment appeals initiated by property owners, if the Treasurer is satisfied that one or more of the following conditions approved by City Council at its meeting held on January 31, February 1 and 2, 2006 are met:
i. the assessed value is greater than $100 million; ii. the potential loss in assessed value is greater than 50 percent of the total assessed value; iii. the potential tax revenue implications are greater than $1.0 million; iv. there are precedent-setting implications; and, v. there are legislative or other implications.
c. initiate a request for reconsideration or review, a motion, an appeal of a decision, and any other adjudicative process that arises out of property assessment matters including an application for Judicial Review and the stating of a case; and
d. take all appropriate measures to deal with any property assessment related matters pursued pursuant to Recommendations 2(a),(b) or (c), including authority to discontinue or settle such matter where it is concluded that it is reasonable to do so, to execute minutes of settlement or any other settlement agreement where warranted.
3. Where the Treasurer, in his or her discretion, has determined that an applicant has made a false or deceptive statement in an application that erroneously qualified the applicant for tax relief under the tax increase cancellation/deferral program for low income seniors or disabled persons, the tax rebate program for ethno-cultural centres, the tax rebate program for registered charities, and the tax rebate program for veteran clubhouses, City Council authorize the Treasurer to:
a. disqualify the property from eligibility for a tax deferral, cancellation, or rebate for the year in respect of which the application was made;
b. require repayment of any tax deferral, cancellation, or rebate paid to the applicant and add the deferred, cancelled or rebated taxes back onto the tax roll from the date that the taxes were originally deferred, cancelled or rebated; and
c. require payment of interest at the rate of 15% per annum on the amount required to be repaid from the date that the taxes were originally deferred, cancelled or rebated.
4. City Council direct that eligibility for ethno-cultural and veteran clubhouse rebates be extended during reconstruction or renovations of property that was used for ethno-cultural or veteran's clubhouse purposes that will result in the property continuing to be used for such purposes, for a period of up to a five (5) years, provided all other eligibility criteria continue to be met.
5. City Council direct that the deadline to apply for a tax rebate for an ethno-cultural centre or a veteran's clubhouse be changed to on or before December 31 of the year following the taxation year for which a tax rebate is first sought, and that such applications be required one time only rather than annually.
6. City Council direct that the various property tax collection and enforcement provisions which are included in the annual tax levy by-law, such as method of payment, late payment charges, and minimum tax be included in Chapter 767.
7. City Council delegate authority to the Treasurer to extend the application deadline for tax rebates for registered charities in the following extenuating circumstances that justify the applicant being unable to make the deadline:
a. to the end of December following the year in respect of which the application is made, and on a one taxation year only basis per registered charity for all properties occupied by the registered charity; and
b. for one year from the date a property first becomes eligible, for property occupied by a registered charity that first becomes eligible when new taxes are first levied as a result of a supplementary or omitted assessment or an assessment or tax appeal.
8. City Council direct that all references to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in Chapter 767 be replaced with reference to the Treasurer.
9. City Council direct that Chapter 767 be amended to reflect all changes recommended by this report, substantially in the form of the draft revised Chapter 767 attached as Appendix A to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Treasurer.
10. City Council direct that Recommendation 3 of the report (July 21, 2014) from the Treasurer, be extended to similarly apply to the water rate rebate program for low-income seniors and disabled persons with the necessary modifications, including replacing the charging of interest with requiring payment of the higher water rate required to be paid if payment is not made by the due date, and that Chapter 849, Water and Sewage Services and Utility Bill, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code be amended to reflect this.
11. City Council direct that Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code be amended to amend section 27-126C(2)(a) to reflect Recommendation 1 of the report (July 21, 2014) from the Treasurer.
12. City Council grant authority for the City Solicitor to make any further amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code as may be required, and to introduce all necessary bills to Council. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Treasurer |
| Summary |
This report seeks Council authority to introduce a series of amendments to Chapter 767, Taxation, Property Tax, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code ("Chapter 767") that will streamline various property tax processes and will clarify and enhance provisions pertaining to some of the City's property tax rebate programs and other property tax matters. Amendments to Chapter 849, Water and Sewage Services and Utility Bill and Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code are also proposed. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Amendments to Chapter 767 of the Municipal Code, Taxation, Property Tax
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71867.pdf) (July 21, 2014) Appendix A - Proposed Revised Version of Municipal Code Chapter 767 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71868.pdf) (August 1, 2014) Public Notice - Amendments to Chapter 27, City of Toronto Municipal Code, Council Procedures (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72488.pdf) |
| GM32.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Lease Dispute Between City and Queen St. Patrick Market Inc. Regarding 238 Queen Street West Property |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations in the confidential transmittal (August 11, 2014) from the Government Management Committee.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in the confidential transmittal (August 11, 2014), if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that the remaining information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 23, 2014) from the City Solicitor, remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Government Management Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider Item GM32.6 titled "Lease Dispute Between City and Queen St. Patrick Market Inc. Regarding 238 Queen Street West Property" as it relates to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
The St. Patrick Market (the “Market Building”) at 238 Queen St. W., is leased by the City to Queen-St. Patrick Market Inc. (“Market Inc.”) for a 50 year term pursuant to a lease dated June 15, 1989 (the “Lease”).
From 1989 to June 19, 2014, the City sub-leased the basement of the Market Building pursuant to a sub-lease dated June 16, 1989 (the “Sub-Lease”).
Legal actions were commenced by Market Inc. against the City and by the City against Market Inc., each alleging that the other had failed to pay the correct amounts owed under the Lease and Sub-Lease. In addition, the City’s legal action sought termination of the Lease on the basis of other alleged breaches of the Lease.
The purpose of this report and the confidential attachment is to seek instructions from Council as to the proposed settlement of the financial dispute between the City and Market Inc. relating to the financial terms of the Lease and Sub-Lease. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Lease Dispute Between City and Queen St. Patrick Market Inc. Regarding 238 Queen Street West Property
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72078.pdf) (July 23, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 - Lease Dispute Between City and Queen St. Patrick Market Inc. Regarding 238 Queen Street West Property |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Confidential Transmittal from Government Management Committee
|
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina (GM.New.GM32.6.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/comm/communicationfile-48937.pdf) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Max Allen, President for Planning and Development, Grange Community Association (GM.New.GM32.6.2) |
| GM32.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Amending Municipal Code Chapters 217, "Records, Corporate (City)" and 169, "Officials, City" |
| Bills 1045 and 1059 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Article II "City Clerk," of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 169, "Officials, City", substantially as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (July 25, 2014) from the City Clerk, to delegate the duties of the "head" for all purposes of MFIPPA to the City Clerk, including both the authority to make decisions on public access to City information and leadership with regarding to protecting the privacy of individuals.
2. City Council amend the text portion of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 217, "Records, Corporate (City)", substantially as set out in Appendix 2 to the report (July 25, 2014) from the City Clerk, in order to:
a. codify the corporate information management mandate of the City Clerk in setting policies, guidelines and standards for the effective and efficient management of City information, including the collection, maintenance, and use of personal information;
b. assign leadership for information technology and information technology policies to the Chief Information Officer; and
c. delegate limited authority to the City Clerk to establish record retention schedules that comply with legislation and are in-line with general practice and approved by the City's external auditor, as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
3. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Clerk and the Accountability Officers, (the Integrity Commissioner, the Ombudsman, the Lobbyist Registrar and the Auditor General), to review the records management requirements and responsibilities of the Accountability Officers in the context of the revised Chapter 217, "Records, Corporate (City)" and bring forward any required amendments to Municipal Code, Chapter 3, "Accountability Officers," through the Executive Committee.
4. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Clerk and representatives of City agencies, to review the records management requirements and responsibilities of the agencies relating to information and records management and bring forward any required amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 219, "Records, Corporate (Local Boards)," to City Council, through the Executive Committee.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft By-laws in Appendices 1 and 2 to the report (July 25, 2014) from the City Clerk as may be required to give effect to City Council's decision. |
| Origin |
| (July 25, 2014) Report from the City Clerk |
| Summary |
Toronto's Municipal Code Chapter 217, "Records, Corporate (City)", has not been substantially updated since amalgamation and needs to be revised to normalize the City Clerk's responsibilities for managing City information and records. The recommendations will codify the corporate information management responsibilities assigned to the City Clerk in 2010, provide a clear foundation for the information management policy framework established since then, and clarify the responsibilities delegated to the City Clerk by City Council.
The recommended changes include revisions to update the language setting out the City Clerk's responsibilities contained in Municipal Code, Chapter 169, "Officials, City" and replacing the existing Chapter 217, "Records, Corporate (City)". |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 25, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Amending Municipal Code Chapters 217, "Records, Corporate (City)" and 169, "Officials, City"
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72160.pdf) Appendices 1 and 2 - Draft By-law and Draft Schedule I (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72161.pdf) |
| GM32.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Conveyance of Part of Zachary Court to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for Inclusion in the Lawrence-Allen Revitalization Project |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the City enter into an Agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation ("TCHC") for the nominal sum conveyance to TCHC of part of Zachary Court, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-27012 and shown as Part 1 on the Sketch PS2014-064 (the "Zachary Court Lands") attached to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, conditional upon City Council approving the permanent closure of the Zachary Court Lands, on terms satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Real Estate Services to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions on such terms as she considers reasonable. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek Council authority to enter into an Agreement to convey a portion of Zachary Court to Toronto Community Housing Corporation, conditional upon Council approving the permanent closure of the subject portion of Zachary Court, in conjunction with the Lawrence Allen Revitalization Project. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Attachments from the Chief Corporate Officer on Conveyance of Part of Zachary Court to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for Inclusion in the Lawrence-Allen Revitalization Project
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72166.pdf) |
| Declared Interests (Committee) |
| The following member(s) declared an interest: |
| GM32.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Union Station Revitalization Project - Status Update |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to amend the following retainer (excluding all recoverable HST), in accordance with the details as specified below:
a. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP in the additional amount of up to $550,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value to $1,500,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes) to continue to provide construction law services and expertise through the construction duration, subject to any additional amounts which may be required related to project claims. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the City of Toronto's Union Station Revitalization Project, including a status report on the construction progress and project budget.
Union Station is a National Historic Site and one of the finest examples of Beaux – Art Architecture in Canada. As part of the sale in 2000 from the Toronto Terminals Railway Company Limited to the City of Toronto, the City was required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with Parks Canada which governs all the restoration work at the station. Union Station opened in 1927 and has often been characterised as a grand urban gateway, and was intended to transform the town of York into a world class metropolis. Today the City of Toronto is setting an example of restoration and revitalization of this historic site, once completed the station will act as a gateway to the waterfront and the City.
The Union Station Revitalization Project is now in its fourth year of a multi-year construction schedule. It is one of the most complicated projects in the country, "wedged" into one of the most congested parts of the City and being undertaken while the TTC funded subway platform reconstruction is underway as well as two other major Metrolinx funded infrastructure projects: the GO Transit Atrium & Track Signalling/Repair, and the construction of the Union Pearson Express terminal station. The total re-investment and re-vitalization by all levels of government and organizations is estimated at approximately $1.5 billion.
The Union Station Revitalization Project is on schedule for completion in 2016. Union Station is by far the largest and busiest transportation hub in the country handling 65 million passengers per year which is expected to grow to 130 million passengers per year by 2021. Without the revitalization of the Station and the capacity the City is adding through concourse construction, the City would not be able to handle these volumes and arguably would be limiting the City's overall potential to grow. This project paired with Metrolinx transit projects are an investment in the City's infrastructure that will promote transit oriented growth in the long term.
The next Project milestone is the completion and turnover to Metrolinx of the newly constructed York Concourse scheduled for October 2014. The General Contractor/Construction Manager (GC/CM) for the work, Carillion Construction Inc., has committed to achieve this milestone date, despite the severe challenge presented to them by the breadth, scope and complexity of the overall project.
As the project has progressed, it is becoming evident from discussions with the Head Lessee that the Station will also act as a destination for culture, entertainment and dining experiences. Union Station will not just be a place that people pass through on their way to work or back, it will become a destination in itself. Union Station will also link the communities north of the station to communities now being developed to the south and will in essence act as a City/community gathering place where "the best of Toronto" can be experienced.
With respect to budget and financing, the Federal Government has stated that it will not provide additional grant funding and discussions with Metrolinx and the Province are continuing.
A recommendation follows to enable the City to bolster its defense against construction claims being filed. Such claims are typically vastly overstated in the first instance, and therefore require careful legal and technical analysis to protect the City's interests during the judicial process. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Revitalization Project - Status Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72162.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix A - Project Financial Report June 30, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72163.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Paul Ainslie |
| GM32.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project - Status Update |
| The Chief Corporate Officer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM32.11a for information) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, with the assistance of the Fairness Monitor, to invite offers from qualified potential lessees to customize the design and to build, finance and operate a restaurant on Nathan Phillips Square substantially in accordance with the Restaurant Operator/ Developer Selection Process section of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer; and, to evaluate those offers and report back to Council with a recommended lessee, together with a recommended lease on commercially reasonable terms acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Government Management Committee requested the Chief Corporate Officer to report directly to City Council to:
1. provide an update on any areas or items of Nathan Phillips Square that were not completed but that were in the original project scope.
2. clarify whether there are any other funding sources available for Nathan Phillips Square. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of the report is to advise on the status of the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization (NPSR) project, including the closing out of contract Phases 1 and 2 and to advise on the steps staff has taken to move forward with the final NPSR project phases. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project - Status Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72180.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project - Status Update (GM32.11a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73093.pdf) |
| GM32.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| 150 Eglinton Avenue East - Lease Renewal for Toronto Employment Social Services |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize a Lease Renewal Agreement with 150 Eglinton Avenue Limited as landlord, for a ten (10) year renewal term commencing November 1, 2014 and expiring on October 31, 2024, substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix "A" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Lease Renewal Agreement including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination, provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into a Lease Renewal Agreement with 150 Eglinton Avenue Limited, as landlord, for 35,601 square feet of space at 150 Eglinton Avenue East, for continued use by Toronto Employment and Social Services. The renewal is for ten (10) years. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on 150 Eglinton Avenue East - Lease Renewal for Toronto Employment Social Services
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72168.pdf) |
| GM32.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Real Estate Acquisition TTC Royal York Subway Station Easier Access Project |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to negotiate to acquire and, if unsuccessful, to initiate expropriation proceedings for the Property, set out in Appendix "A" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, for the purposes of the TTC Royal York Subway Station Easier Access Phase III Project.
2. City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Property, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearings that are received, to attend any hearings in order to present the City’s position and to report the Inquiry Officer’s recommendations back to City Council for its consideration. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The TTC Royal York Subway Station Easier Access Phase III Project (the "Project") calls for the installation of three new elevators to provide passenger accessibility from street level to the two below grade subway platforms. All of the proposed elevators will be located within lands owned by the City; however, in order to construct and maintain one of the elevators ("E2"), the rear portion of 18 Willingdon Boulevard (the "Property") is required. This report seeks authority to negotiate to acquire easements for the Property as set out in Appendix "A" and illustrated in Appendix "B", and, if necessary, initiate expropriation proceedings. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Real Estate Acquisition -
TTC Royal York Subway Station Easier Access Project
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72192.pdf) |
| GM32.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| Real Estate Acquisitions TTC Runnymede Subway Station Easier Access and Masonry Repair Projects |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. Subject to the Toronto Transit Commission ("TTC") obtaining authority with regards to the acquisition of various property interests at the rear of premises nos. 2194 to 2218 Bloor Street West (the Property) for the purposes of the Easier Access Phase III Project and the Masonry Repair Project, City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to negotiate to acquire the Property set out in Appendix "A" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and to initiate expropriation proceedings, where necessary.
2. City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Property, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearings that are received, to attend any hearings in order to present the City’s position and to report the Inquiry Officer’s recommendations back to City Council for its consideration. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
Runnymede Subway Station will be undergoing upgrades that will include installation of new elevators to provide passenger accessibility from street level to the below grade subway platforms ("Easier Access Phase III Project") and repairs to the masonry wall along the south side of the station building ("Masonry Repair Project") (collectively the "Projects"). In order to facilitate these projects, various property interests at the rear of premises nos. 2194 to 2218 Bloor Street West (the "Property"), as set out in Appendix "A" and illustrated in Appendix "B", are required. This report seeks authority to acquire the Property and, if necessary, initiate expropriation proceedings. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A, B and C from the Chief Corporate Officer on Real Estate Acquisitions - TTC Runnymede Subway Station Easier Access and Masonry Repair Projects
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72197.pdf) |
| GM32.15 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:21 |
| Real Estate Acquisition TTC St. Clair West Subway Station - Easier Access Program |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to negotiate to acquire the Property Interests as set out in Appendix "A" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and to initiate expropriation proceedings, where necessary.
2. City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Property Interests, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearings that are received, to attend any hearings in order to present the City's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
This report seeks authority to negotiate to acquire certain property interests (the "Property Interests") as defined in Appendix "A" and shown in Appendix "B" located at 396 St. Clair Avenue West, owned by Loblaw Properties Limited ("LPL"), a portion of which are leased to the Liquor Control Board of Ontario ("LCBO"). The Property Interests are required to install an elevator (the "Elevator") in the St. Clair West Subway Station (the "Subway Station") pursuant to the Toronto Transit Commission's ("TTC") St. Clair Easier Access Program (the "Project").
Staff have been in lengthy discussions with both parties and to ensure construction scheduling and timelines for completion of the Project are met, this report seeks authority to initiate expropriation proceedings where necessary. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Real Estate Acquistion - TTC St. Clair West Subway Station - Easier Access Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72208.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix A - Private Property Requirements (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72229.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix B - Property Requirements and Location Map (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72233.pdf) |
| GM32.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:12 |
| Surplus Land Declaration for Portion of Valley Crescent and Acquisition of 85-R Westbury Crescent |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the portion of Valley Crescent shown as Parts 1 and 2 on the sketch attached to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, as Appendix "B" (the "Road Allowance Lands") from the notification requirements set out in Item MM52.17 adopted by City Council at its meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014.
2. City Council declare the Road Allowance Lands surplus, conditional upon City Council approving the permanent closure of the Road Allowance Lands as a public highway, and authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to invite an offer(s) to purchase the Road Allowance Lands from the owners of 75-R and 77-R Westbury Crescent that includes a proposed land exchange involving 85-R Westbury Crescent.
3. City Council authorize and direct staff to take all steps necessary to comply with the City’s real estate disposal process set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
4. City Council authorize the City to acquire the property municipally known as 85 R Westbury Crescent, shown as Part 1 on the sketch attached as Appendix "C" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, in its "as-is" condition, including without limitation, its environmental condition, and on such other terms as may be acceptable to the Director, Real Estate Services, if the owners of 75-R and 77-R Westbury Crescent submit an offer(s) to purchase the Road Allowance Lands that includes a proposed conveyance of 85-R Westbury Crescent to the City and the offer(s) is approved by the appropriate City authorities and accepted by the City. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
This report seeks authority to declare a small portion of the untraveled public highway known as Valley Crescent surplus to the City's requirements, conditional upon City Council approving the permanent closure of this portion of the public highway, with the intended manner of disposal to be to invite an offer(s) to purchase from the owners of 75 R and 77-R Westbury Crescent. This report also seeks authority to acquire the property known municipally as 85-R Westbury Crescent in its "as-is" condition. Approval of these recommendations would permit a potential land exchange between the City and the related owners of 75-R and 77-R Westbury Crescent, who are also related to the owner of 85-R Westbury Crescent. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A, B and C from the Chief Corporate Officer, on Surplus Land Declaration for Portion of Valley Crescent and Acquisition of 85-R Westbury Crescent
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72204.pdf) |
| GM32.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Required Land Acquisitions and Related Costs to Complete East-West Road between Rean Drive and Kenaston Gardens |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending land acquisition by the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to execute and deliver an Offer to Purchase on 13 Barberry Place, such Offer to be consistent with the confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and that the necessary amount be financed from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund.
2. In the event that the southerly 3 metres of 11 Kenaston Gardens and all of 15 Kenaston Gardens cannot be acquired by the City for nominal consideration through the development process and if the OMB does not require the conveyance of these properties to the City for public road purposes as a condition of development approval, City Council grant authority to initiate the expropriation process to acquire the southerly 3 metres of 11 Kenaston Gardens and all of 15 Kenaston Gardens, including serving and publishing Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate, forwarding to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing received, attending at the hearing to present the City’s position, and reporting the Inquiry Officer’s recommendation to City Council for its consideration, along with identification of funding sources for the expropriations.
3. In the event that 23 Barberry Place cannot be acquired by the City for nominal consideration through the development process if and when a development application is submitted, City Council grant authority to the Chief Corporate Officer to initiate the expropriation process for 23 Barberry Place, such Offer to be conditional upon City Council approving the transaction terms and necessary funding for this acquisition.
4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer remain confidential as it is about a proposed or pending land acquisition by the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions, or if the City decides to acquire these properties for the purpose of constructing a new east-west road connecting Rean Drive to Kenaston Gardens, this information is to remain confidential until all of the properties required to construct the road have been acquired by the City. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Government Management Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider Item GM32.17 titled "Required Land Acquisitions and Related Costs to Complete East-West Road between Rean Drive and Kenaston Gardens" as it relates to a proposed or pending land acquisition by the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide the Government Management Committee with information about the land acquisitions necessary to complete a new connecting east/west road running from Rean Drive to Kenaston Gardens, the potential costs involved in acquiring these lands, and the source of funds which could be used to acquire these lands.
The properties that would be affected by the creation of this new road are:
1. 591 Sheppard Avenue East 2. 13 Barberry Place 3. 11 Kenaston Gardens 4. 15 Kenaston Gardens 5. 23 Barberry Place
All other lands required to complete this road have already been conveyed to the City through the development approval process. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B to the Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Required Land Acquisitions and Related Costs to Complete East-West Road between Rean Drive and Kenaston Gardens
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72187.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 - Required Land Acquisitions and Related Costs to Complete East-West Road between Rean Drive and Kenaston Gardens |
| Speakers |
| Ryan M. Guetter, Vice President, Weston Consulting |
| GM32.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:3 |
| Lease Agreement with Alderbuds Child Care Centre at 399 The West Mall |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize a new lease agreement with Alderbuds Child Care Centre for a five (5) year term, substantially based on the terms set out in Appendix A attached to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services, with such revisions, and such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, to administer and manage the agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a new lease agreement with Alderbuds Child Care Centre (ACCC) for approximately 3,600 square feet of space and 3934.2 square feet of playground facilities in Etobicoke Civic Centre at 399 The West Mall at nominal value. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services, on Lease Agreement with Alderbuds Child Care Centre at 399 The West Mall
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72259.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix A - Proposed Lease Terms and Conditions for Alderbuds Child Care Centre (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72323.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix B - Location Map for Alderbuds Child Care Centre (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72324.pdf) |
| GM32.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Below-Market Rent Sub-Lease Agreement at 39 Queens Quay East (Pier 27) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize a new Below-Market Rent sub-lease agreement with No. 9 Contemporary Art & the Environment for a five-year term, substantially on the terms set out in Appendix "A" attached to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, with such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council grant an exemption to the Below-Market Rent policy, and provide its consent and authority, to allow No. 9 Contemporary Art & the Environment to sub-sublease a portion of the space at 39 Queens Quay East to the three following organizations:
1. Sustainable Thinking and Expression on Public Space Initiative (STEPS) 2. Latin American Art Projects (LACAP) 3. Friends of the Pan Am Path
The sub-subtenant and all sub-subtenants will be required to agree to comply with the terms of the head lease between the City and developer of 39 Queens Quay East.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, to administer and manage the sub-lease agreement including the provision of any consents, approvals, and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the sub-lease and deliver any notices, pay expenses and amend the commencement and other dates to such earlier or late date(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time, determine.
5. City Council grant an exemption from the Return on Investment (ROI) requirement as the tool is under development with Social Development, Finance and Administration Division. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain Council authority to enter into a new Below Market Rent (BMR) sub-lease agreement with No. 9 Contemporary Art and the Environment at 39 Queens Quay East (referred to as Pier 27) in Ward 28 Toronto Central - Rosedale neighbourhood.
No. 9 Contemporary Art & the Environment (the "Subtenant") will use this BMR space to create an arts hub in this emerging neighbourhood in partnership with three other sub-subtenants: Sustainable Thinking and Expression on Public Space Initiative (STEPS), Latin American Art Projects (LACAP) and Friends of the Pan Am Path. The resulting "Arts Hub 27" will provide a range of art and design programming to this community in order to address a variety of social, community, economic and environmental issues. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Below-Market Rent Sub-Lease Agreement at 39 Queens Quay East (Pier 27)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72230.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix "A" - Major Terms and Conditions (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72231.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Appendix "B" - Location Map for 39 Queens Quay East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72232.pdf) |
| GM32.21 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 20, 24, 35, 37, 40, 43 |
| Child Care Lease Agreements Between City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City, as tenant, to enter into Fifteen (15) lease agreements with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, as landlord, for each of the directly operated Early Learning and Child Care locations listed in Appendix "A" to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "A" together with such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council grant authority for the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease agreements, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services |
| Summary |
The purpose of this Report is to obtain Council’s authority for the City, as tenant, to enter into Fifteen (15) lease agreements for directly operated Early Learning and Child Care programs with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, as landlord, for a five (5) year term, commencing January 1, 2014 substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "A". |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services, on Child Care Lease Agreements Between City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72251.pdf) |
| GM32.22 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Contract for the Provision of Leasing Proprietary Software and Data Services from Bloomberg Finance LP |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority to award a contract to Bloomberg Finance LP at a cost estimated not to exceed $345,678.72 USD net of HST recoveries, over the four year period (two consecutive 2-year renewable leasing agreements) from January 5, 2015 to January 4, 2019, on terms acceptable to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request authority to enter into a proprietary sole source contract with Bloomberg Finance LP (Bloomberg), for the continued leasing of proprietary software, data services and network access/router services for a four-year period (two consecutive 2-year renewable leasing agreements) from January 5, 2015 to January 4, 2019.
A contract for this service is required to continue to provide an all-in platform for communications, analytical and information services that are integrated with the global financial markets. These services are essential tools for gathering and analyzing information as well as making decisions for investment selection, portfolio management and debt issuance. Only this vendor can provide this complete suite of services due to proprietary reasons.
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-1 Purchasing, and Chapter 71-11 Financial Control where the cumulative five year commitment and $500,000.00 threshold exceeds staff authority. The current four-year term proprietary sole source contract with Bloomberg approved under GM33.34 expires on January 4, 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Contract for the Provision of Leasing Proprietary Software and Data Services from Bloomberg Finance LP
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72253.pdf) |
| GM32.23 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Contract with the Royal Lifesaving Society for the provision of the Aquatic Lifesaving Program Affiliation, Licensing Fees, Candidate Exam, Certification Fees and Course Materials |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority for the issuance of a sole source contract with the Royal Lifesaving Society for Aquatic Lifesaving Program Affiliation and Licensing Fees, Candidate Exam and Certification Fees and the Supply of Course Materials in the estimated total, not to exceed the amount of $1,200,869.25 net of applicable taxes and charges ($1,222,004.55 Net of HST Recoveries) for a 14 month period, effective November 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Material Management |
| Summary |
This report requests that City Council grant authority for the issuance of a proprietary sole source contract with the Royal Lifesaving Society (the Society) for the continued supply of Aquatic Lifesaving Program Affiliation and Licensing Fees, Candidate Exam and Certification Fees and the Supply of Course Materials for a 14 month period effective November 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015 and for the amount of $1,200,869.25 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($1,222,004.55 Net of HST recoveries).
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-1 Purchasing, and Chapter 71-11 Financial Control where the cumulative five year commitment and $500,000.00 threshold exceeds under staff authority. The current sole source contract with the Society approved under GM24.16 expires on October 31, 2014. A new contract for these fees and materials is required for continued aquatic life saving program delivery by Parks, Forestry and Recreation for the remainder of 2014 and 2015 for which the Society has the proprietary rights. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Contract with the Royal Lifesaving Society for the provision of the Aquatic Lifesaving Program Affiliation, Licensing Fees, Candidate Exam, Certification Fees and Course Materials
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71740.pdf) |
| GM32.26 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Use of the Province of Ontario's Vendor of Record for Procurement of Information Technology Research Subscription Services |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement in the form of a "Provincially Funded Organization Notice" with each qualified vendor from the Province of Ontario Vendor of Record for IT Research Subscription Services that acknowledges and sets out the terms of the delivery of services to municipalities, agencies, schools and hospitals via the Province's Master Agreement.
2. City Council grant authority to enter into separate non-exclusive one (1) year agreements, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with each of the qualified vendors resulting from the Province of Ontario Vendor of Record for IT Research Subscription Services at any time between the date of approval and the end of the initial Vendors of Record #055-00437059 (VOR) period of June 30, 2015, for the amount of $233,000 with the option to renew for one (1) additional year term, for the amount of $245,000 ending no later than June 30, 2017, for subscription costs, excluding all taxes. |
| Origin |
| (July 25, 2014) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek authority to utilize the Province of Ontario's Master Agreement for IT Research Subscription Services dated July 1, 2014 for Vendors of Record #OSS-00437059 ("VOR"), which is the result of a competitive procurement process, and to enter into separate agreements with the Vendor's of Record, for the supply of online information and technology research subscription services. Use of the Province of Ontario VOR has been made available on an optional use bases to Provincially Funded Organizations such as municipalities, agencies, hospitals and school boards. The VOR allows for a one (1) year agreement to be entered into with qualified vendors at any point between, July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015 with options to renew.
Benefits of utilizing the VOR include: access to the same market rates established by the Province's Master Agreement for the provision of information technology research subscription services; time and cost avoidances in acquiring these services independently and managing the VOR, timely access to a repository of online information and technology research, and agility in obtaining the most relevant blend of research subscription services over the terms of the VOR. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 25, 2014) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Use of the Province of Ontario's Vendor of Record for Procurement of Information Technology Research Subscription Services
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72235.pdf) |
| GM32.30 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Challenges faced by Conseil Scolaire Viamonde in terms of French-language services |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council forward the concerns of Toronto French Language Advisory Committee to the Chair, Toronto Police Service Board and the Chair, Toronto Board of Health as follows:
Toronto Police Services:
a. French-language Community Safety Services are insufficient because there is only one employee to deliver services to French-language schools; and
b. Neighbourhood / Community alerts do not always reach French-language schools, because of differences in jurisdictional boundaries.
Toronto Public Health:
c. The need to increase the number of documents available in the French language, especially concerning required vaccinations and communicable diseases; and
d. The need to make marketing tools and displays on public hygiene available in the French language. |
| Origin |
| (July 16, 2014) Letter from the French Language Advisory Committee |
| Summary |
The French Language Advisory Committee on July 16, 2014, considered a presentation from the Director of Communications and Marketing, Conseil Scolaire Viamonde, on Conseil Scolaire Viamonde's concerns related to inadequate French language services provided by the Toronto Police Service and Toronto Public Health, and forwarded recommendations to the Government Management Committee. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 16, 2014) Letter from French Language Advisory Committee on Challenges faced by Conseil Scolaire Viamonde in terms of French-language services
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72156.pdf) |
| GM32.33 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Amendment to Sole Source Purchase Order No. 6034414 issued to Rochon Genova LLP for Rent Arbitration - 2 Bloor Street East |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Government Management Committee recommend that:
1. City Council grant authority to amend and increase the value of Rochon Genova LLP Purchase Order No. 6034414 for an additional $750,000.00, net of HST ($763,200.00 net of HST recoveries). This amount will increase the current contract value from $459,238.71, net of HST ($467,321.31 net of HST recoveries) to $1,209,238.70, net of HST ($1,230,521.30 net of HST recoveries).
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 8, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, remain confidential as it is the subject of litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City or a local board. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Government Management Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider Item GM32.33 titled "Amendment to Sole Source Purchase Order No. 6034414 issued to Rochon Genova LLP for Rent Arbitration - 2 Bloor Street East" as it relates to litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City or local board. |
| Origin |
| (August 8, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6034414, issued to Rochon Genova LLP in the amount of $459,238.71, net of HST ($467,321.31 net of HST recoveries), to increase the Purchase Order by an additional amount of $750,000.00, net of HST ($763,200.00 net of HST recoveries). The total amended value of the Purchase Order will be $1,209,238.70, net of HST ($1,230,521.30 net of HST recoveries). The additional funds are required for the continuing retention of legal services with regards to a rent renewal arbitration for a long term ground lease on the City's property located at 2 Bloor Street East.
The Purchase Order for the specialized legal services of this prolonged rent arbitration is almost depleted. Real Estate Services is now seeking authority to amend the Purchase Order to maintain the legal services required to finalize the arbitration process.
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code By-law Chapter 195-9 (B)(C) - Purchasing, and where the current request exceeds the threshold of $500,000, net of HST, allowed under staff authority as per Municipal Code By-law Chapter 71-11.1 (C) – Financial Control. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 8, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Amendment to Sole Source Purchase Order No. 6034414 issued to Rochon Genova LLP for Rent Arbitration - 2 Bloor Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72678.pdf) (August 8, 2014) Confidential Attachment - Amendment to Sole Source Purchase Order No. 6034414 Issued to Rochon Genova LLP for Rent Arbitration - 2 Bloor Street East |
| Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 30 |
| LS30.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs |
| The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (LS30.1a with recommendations) BR>The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (LS30.1b with recommendations) |
| Public Notice Given |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to develop a policy on appropriate enforcement actions for multiple violations under the Provincial Offences Act for violations of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs.
2. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 693, Signs to provide that election signs may be erected/displayed for federal, provincial and municipal elections, 14 days prior to election day.
3. City Council amend Appendix C – Schedule 12 of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, by:
a. deleting the $250.00 Removal and Storage Fee for improperly displaying elections; and
b. adding a $125.00 Removal and Storage Fee for improperly displaying election signs during the Election Sign Period.
4. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 693, Signs by:
a. adding a new subsection D in Section 693-6 – General Requirements, as follows:
§ 69 § 693-6. General requirements.
D. No person or his or her agent shall erect, attach, place, display or permit the erection, attachment, placement or display of an election sign on public or private property unless:
(1) The candidate to whom the sign relates has paid the fee set out in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, for the service of removal and storage of improperly displayed election signs during the Election Sign Period; or
(2) The person has paid the per sign fee set out in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, for the service of the administration, review, inspection and enforcement of improperly displayed election signs during the Election Sign Period.
b. replacing subsections B(1) and (2) in Section 693-10 – Removal of Unlawful Election Signs with the following:
§ 693-10. Removal of unlawful election signs.
B. Costs for removal and storage of signs.
(1) If an election sign is removed for being erected or displayed in violation of this article outside of the Election Sign Period, in addition to any fine or other penalty which may be imposed for an offence under this article, the candidate to whom the sign relates will be charged the fee for removal and storage of improperly displayed election signs prior to or after the Election Sign Period, as set out in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges;
(2) If a candidate has not paid the fee described in § 693-6D, and an election sign is removed for being erected or displayed in violation of this article during the Election Sign Period, in addition to any fine or other penalty which may be imposed for an offence under this article, the candidate to whom the sign relates will be charged the fee for removal and storage of improperly displayed election signs during the Election Sign Period, as set out in Chapter 441, Fees and Charges.
5. City Council approve amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs, substantially in accordance with the administrative design contained in Attachment 1, as amended, in the report (August 1, 2014) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
6. City Council approve amendments to Appendix C, Schedule 12, of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, substantially in accordance with the administrative design contained in Attachment 2, as amended, in the report (August 1, 2014) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes as may be required. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Licensing and Standards Committee requested the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to submit a report to City Council on corners and right-of-way issues.
The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards Division, gave a presentation. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
This report responds to direction from the Licensing and Standards Committee at its meeting of May 26, 2014, which requested a review of the current by-law governing election signs, including a scan of other municipalities. This review has identified a number of recommended amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs, which will address concerns previously raised by the Ombudsman and the Auditor General and will further address a number of administrative challenges experienced with the current by-law.
The proposed amendments include changes to the time period for which election signs may be erected or displayed; where election signs may be placed; fees, removal and storage of seized election signs; the waiver of fees/affidavits process; and the acceptable methods of payment for amounts owed to the City for election sign-related charges.
City Clerk's Office and Legal Services were consulted in the preparation of this report. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II,
Election Signs
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72506.pdf) Attachment 1 - Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72527.pdf) Attachment 2 - Amendments to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C, Schedule 12 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72528.pdf) Attachment 3 - Summary of Jurisdictional Research (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72569.pdf) (August 18, 2014) Presentation from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72864.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 20, 2014) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Chapter 693, Signs, Article II, Election Signs - Additional Amendments (LS30.1a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73028.pdf) (August 22, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Proposed Amendments to Chapter 693, Signs, Article II Election Signs (LS30.1b) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73158.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| Speakers |
| Mary Hynes |
| LS30.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Reinstatement of Licence Issuance and Fees for Private Parking Enforcement Agencies |
| Bill 914 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, by deleting the Private Parking Enforcement Agency licence fees as set out in Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards, and adding the following licence fees for 2014, subject to annual inflation:
a. Application fee: $383.00
b. Renewal fee: $257.50
2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to reinstate the issuance of Private Parking Enforcement Agency licences and enforcement for non-payment of fees for this class of licence.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to assess the $257.50 renewal fee for Private Parking Enforcement Agencies:
a. that were previously licensed with Municipal Licensing and Standards prior to City Council's November 30, December 1 and 2, 2004 decision to suspend the collection of Private Parking Enforcement Agency licence fees, and/or
b. that have applied to be licensed with Municipal Licensing and Standards while the suspension was in effect.
4. City Council direct that the proposed changes come into force on October 1, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
At its meeting of November 30, December 1 and 2, 2004, City Council directed that the collection of Private Parking Enforcement Agency (PPEA) licence fees be suspended pending review and resolution of appropriate fees for this class of licence.
This report recommends the reinstatement of these licence fees and the reissuance of these licences, as well as outlines the issues and consumer impacts of PPEA operations.
Over the last several years, complaints concerning the activities of unlicensed PPEAs have continued to grow, and their activities have had an adverse impact on members of the public, as well as on the operations of legitimate PPEAs who have applied to be licensed with Municipal Licensing and Standards and who operate within the Toronto Police Service supervised Municipal Law Enforcement (MLE) Program.
The necessary amendments to the by-law will be the subject of a future report based upon a comprehensive review of Chapter 545, Licensing, Articles XXXVII, PPEA and XXII, Public Garages, which will be conducted in 2015 to address the growing number of complaints regarding commercial parking lots and enforcement activities, as well as recent court rulings.
Legal Services and the Toronto Police Service Parking Enforcement Unit were consulted in the preparation of this report. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Reinstatement of Licence Issuance and Fees for Private Parking Enforcement Agencies
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72507.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| David Stephens, President, Federal Protection Inc. |
| LS30.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| The Retirement Homes Act, 2010 and its Impact on the City of Toronto's By-Laws |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council forward the report (August 1, 2014) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to the Retirement Home Regulatory Authority and Toronto area Members of Provincial Parliament for their information.
2. City Council request the Retirement Home Regulatory Authority to advise the City of Toronto and Members of Council of approved new nursing/retirement homes. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
As directed by City Council at its meeting of July 8, 9, 10, and 11, 2014, this report provides information related to the Government of Ontario's adoption of the Retirement Homes Act, 2010, ("the Act") a law to regulate retirement homes in Ontario. The Act created mandatory care and safety standards, residents' rights, and the Retirement Home Regulatory Authority (RHRA), a not-for-profit organization accountable to the provincial government. The RHRA is responsible for licensing retirement homes, conducting inspections, investigating complaints and enforcing standards outlined under the Act.
As retirement homes are regulated by the provincial government, the City of Toronto does not regulate the standards of care delivered at these facilities. However, several City divisions, including Toronto Public Health, Toronto Fire Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards and Toronto Building, play a role in the maintenance of public health and safety and property standards at retirement homes. To provide greater clarity to Members of Council and the public, this report outlines the roles played by various City divisions, in the oversight and maintenance of standards at retirement homes in Toronto.
Toronto Public Health, Toronto Building, Toronto Fire Services, Long-Term Care Homes and Services and Social Development, Finance and Administration were consulted in the preparation of this report. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on The Retirement Homes Act, 2010 and its Impact on the City of Toronto's By-Laws
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72530.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Chin Lee |
| LS30.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Amending Liquor Licence Application Objection Criteria |
| Communication LS30.5.2 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council rescind its direction to the City Clerk under part 5 of item CC50.7 headed "Conditions Attached to Liquor Licences":
Direction to be rescinded:
5. City Council direct the City Clerk to declare that each liquor licence application is not in the public interest unless the applicant has filed with the City Clerk:
a. an enforceable undertaking that the applicant or all managers of the premises will take the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Safer Bars program within 12 months of the issuance of the liquor licence; and
b. a letter from the local MPP supporting the application for the liquor licence at the premises.
2. City Council authorize the City Clerk to withdraw the City's objections to liquor licence applications made under the general direction above. |
| Origin |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
In April 2014, City Council directed the City Clerk to declare a liquor licence application not in the public interest unless the applicant provided an enforceable undertaking that they would complete the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Safer Bars program and provided a letter of support from the local MPP.
This decision was made in response to a staff report from Legal Services outlining a communication received from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO). This communication indicated, in part, that the AGCO would no longer accept or enforce conditions on liquor licensed establishments that were beyond the regulatory mandate of the AGCO.
Many discussions over the past few months, culminated in a meeting which was convened on July 31, 2014, that brought together City Councillors, MPPs, City staff, and staff from the AGCO. It provided an opportunity to discuss concerns with the current challenges facing the city, the impact to business that these application criteria were having, the challenges they met in complying, and the positive progress and actions that had been undertaken.
On August 11, 2014, the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards (ML&S) received a correspondence from the AGCO, which indicated that existing conditions on liquor licences will remain in force until the City has developed a long-term strategy to address the issues surrounding restaurants, bars and entertainment establishments with liquor licences.
ML&S is in the process of establishing the "Municipal Interest in Liquor Licensing Steering Committee," which will lead a number of working groups to review and identify process, policy and/or by-law improvements related to the regulation of liquor licensed establishments. The Steering Committee and work groups will include key stakeholders such as enforcement agencies, interested Councillors, businesses and resident groups. The correspondence from the AGCO also reaffirmed their ongoing commitment to continue the ongoing collaboration and participation in the Steering Committee and work groups currently under development.
In light of this recent communication, and in support of enabling lawful business operators, this report recommends the reconsideration by City Council of the need to require liquor licence applicants to complete the Safer Bars program and to obtain a letter of support from the local provincial representative. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Amending Liquor Licence Application Objection Criteria
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72861.pdf) (August 11, 2014) Attachment 1 - Letter from Tom Mungham, Chief Operating Officer, Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72862.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from John Nunziata on behalf of Ontario Restaurant Hotel and Motel Association (ORHMA) Toronto Restaurant Region (LS.Main.LS30.5.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/comm/communicationfile-49379.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Christian Chan, C2 Urban Planning (CC.New.LS30.5.2)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49582.pdf) |
| LS30.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Acceptance of Grant from PetSmart Charities of Canada |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to accept and spend the grant of $250,000 from PetSmart Charities of Canada for the purchase of a mobile spay/neuter clinic vehicle and necessary medical equipment to start the mobile spay/neuter program.
2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to enter into an agreement with PetSmart Charities of Canada to accept the grant on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
3. City Council express its sincere appreciation and gratitude to PetSmart Charities of Canada for the grant.
4. City Council approve a $250,000 gross and $0 net increase to the Municipal Licensing and Standards 2014 Approved Operating Budget to reflect Recommendation 1 above. |
| Origin |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto has been awarded a grant from PetSmart Charities of Canada in the amount of $250,000. This grant will fund a Toronto Animal Services initiative to provide mobile spay/neuter services in the City's 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas. This program will provide accessible, free or low-cost spay/neuter services and pet care information to residents. The funds will be utilized for the purchase of the mobile spay/neuter clinic vehicle and medical equipment necessary for the program.
This report recommends that City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to enter into an agreement with PetSmart Charities of Canada to accept the grant on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
The grant from PetSmart Charities of Canada complies with applicable City policies, including, without limitation, the City of Toronto Sponsorship Policy. The Sponsorship Policy does not require City Council approval for grants less than $500,000, however, given the substantial amount being granted and the uniqueness of the initiative, staff felt this report was appropriate. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Acceptance of Grant from PetSmart Charities of Canada
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-72860.pdf) |
| Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 29 |
| PE29.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Update - Energy Reporting Requirement for Large Buildings |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to enter into all necessary agreements with the Ontario Power Authority, utility companies, government agencies and other partners, in forms satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to support research, program design and implementation activities in connection with the energy reporting requirement, as required. |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
This report provides an interim update regarding the development of a mandatory energy and water use benchmarking and reporting requirement for large buildings. Research activities are underway by City staff, in co-operation with a cross-corporate working group, and with support from an external consultant, to evaluate the feasibility of such an initiative and analysis of key policy issues.
Based on the research findings, and subsequent stakeholder engagement process, a proposed by-law and implementation plan will be presented to City Council for consideration in 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Update - Energy Reporting Requirement for Large Buildings
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-72482.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Caroline Bordeaux, Project and Partnership Coordinator, Green Button (PE.New.PE29.2.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-48972.pdf) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Mary Pickering (PE.New.PE29.2.2) |
| PE29.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Recommendations of the Tree Canopy Roundtable |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to examine the division vernacular used to describe organic refuse, and the possibility of instituting a vernacular which could better describe the city’s commitment to environmentally friendly practice and minimizing waste.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to examine the benefit of partnering with not-for-profit organizations towards enhancing private tree planting.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to continue to support volunteer-led community urban forest inventories for trees located on private property in an effort to increase recognition of the importance of private land stewardship.
4. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to engage the City Manager's Office, Strategic Communications in an effort to develop creative public outreach campaigns, such as New York's successful Million Trees campaign.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to examine how local academic urban forest research could be supported with funding either through direct funding from the City of Toronto or through charitable donations such as through the Toronto Parks and Trees Foundation.
6. City Council request the City Manager's Office, Corporate Intergovernmental and Agency Relations, with the support of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to work with the Green Infrastructure Ontario Coalition to engage provincial and federal government agencies in an effort to gain increased policy recognition and protection of green infrastructure.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to begin collecting outcome measures for tree-bylaw administration, including infractions and enforcement.
8. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to explore working with other organizations like Scouts Canada on the feasibility of purchasing trees in bulk.
9. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, to explore ways to more prominently feature and account for the protection of Toronto's heritage trees. |
| Origin |
| (April 29, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Sarah Doucette, Co-Chairs of the Tree Canopy Roundtable |
| Summary |
Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Sarah Doucette, forwarding the findings from the Tree Canopy Roundtable meeting and requesting feedback on the recommendations from the Tree Canopy Roundtable. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (April 29, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Sarah Doucette, Co-Chairs of the Tree Canopy Roundtable
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-71359.pdf) |
| PE29.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Implementing a New Special Event Permit Category and Corresponding Fee Capturing not for Profit Corporate Gatherings in Parks |
| Bill 986 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the introduction of a Corporate Employee Special Event –Not-for-profit user fee set at twice the rate of a Not for profit Special Event user fee for not-for-profit corporate / group gatherings in parks outlined in the report adopted by City Council at its meeting of October 8, 9, 10, and 11, 2013 entitled "Strategy for Commercial and Private Special Events in City Parks" or any other park as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix E – Schedule 1, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to add the Corporate Employee Special Event – Not-for-Profit User Fee. |
| Origin |
| (July 30, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale |
| Summary | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division (PFR) has received requests to permit space for special events that are not for profit corporate gatherings.
Currently, there are two types of requests for Special Event permits.
1. Special Events: To hold a special event in any of our City of Toronto parks the event must be:
i. Open to the public; ii. Deemed non-profit by letters patent, or a registered charitable number; iii A non-promotional activity; iv. Events are required to be free of charge to the public; v. Recreation programs or events sponsored by community non-profit groups; and vi. Community Service programs or events local in nature to the benefit of residents of the City of Toronto
The current fee schedule for Special Events is as follows:
2. Commercial and Private Special Events: In 2013, Council adopted a pilot for commercial special events in 10 parks. This policy allows private event organizers to hold for profit, promotional events that are closed to public. The pilot fees range from $1,785 - $8,925 depending on the park. The report can be viewed at:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.PE22.4
Parks, Forestry and Recreation has been receiving applications for Corporate employee picnics which is a category not captured by the two existing policies and fee structures. These events are closed to public and the permit application is a for-profit corporation. However, the event itself is not profit or promotion driven and is for employee gathering. These Corporate employee gatherings do not involve “…the exchange, production, purchase or sale of goods or services of any kind or nature for the purpose of making profit. These can include corporate sponsored events, festivals, performances, product promotions and sampling.”
There is no suitable permit rate that fits this request and the Customer Service Unit in PFR has had to charge the Corporate Commercial Special Event fee which was intended to be used for large commercial for profit special events. This rate which ranges from $1,785 - $8,925 depending on the park is cost prohibitive to For Profit businesses looking to hold a staff picnic at City parks. A third fee category that is higher than not for profit special events but not at the corporate special event rate would encourage for profit businesses to hold employee recognition special events.
The proposed fee schedule for Corporate Employee Special Events –Not-for Profit is as follows:
This motion was submitted to the July 8, 2014 City Council meeting but was not accepted due to public notice being required for recommendations regarding new user fees. This motion is being provided prior to the Parks and Environment Committee meeting, to allow sufficient time for public notice to be given. Any proposed new user fees are subject to annual adjustment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 30, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell on Implementing a New Special Event Permit Category and Corresponding Fee Capturing Not for Profit Corporate Gatherings in Parks
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-72330.pdf) (August 8, 2014) Public Notice - Implementing a New Special Event Permit Category and Corresponding Fee Capturing Not for Profit Corporate Gatherings in Parks (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-72562.pdf) |
| PE29.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Lower Don Trail Accessibility |
| Communication PE29.8.17 has been submitted on this Item |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council re-confirm its commitment to accessibility on the Lower Don Trail.
2. City Council direct the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to undertake further study on potential points of access onto the Lower Don Trail, in particular the pedestrian bridge joining Riverdale Park East and West.
3. City Council direct the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to provide a report to the Parks and Environment Committee in the second quarter, 2015 on the results. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30 - Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
The Lower Don Trail has limited accessibility from Queen Street to Danforth Avenue.
Currently there are stairs at Queen as well as the Riverdale foot bridge. While there is a trench to wheel a bicycle up and down the stairs it is awkward and cumbersome. Many riders simply carry their bikes up the stairs. Trail access and egress at these points is limited to those who can manage their bicycles on the steep incline.
As part of the Lower Don Trail Master Plan there will be two new stair entrances; one from Dundas and one from Gerrard onto the trail.
In May, I had a site meeting on the trail with staff from DTAH, TRCA, PFR and members of the cycling committee to review the Master Plan for the Lower Don trail and to see if the new stairway entrances at Gerrard and Dundas could be made more accessible for cyclists, and anyone with mobility issues. Both of the locations are on street car routes and of course our new street cars will be fully accessible.
Sadly, it was not deemed possible at either of these locations.
There remains a real need for an accessible point on the trail between Queen and Danforth and it was suggested that the pedestrian bridge from Riverdale Park East to West may be a good option. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 23, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher on Lower Don Trail Accessibility
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-72464.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Kenneth Brown |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Krista Darin (PE.New.PE29.8.1)
(August 13, 2014) E-mail from David Creelman (PE.New.PE29.8.2) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Dylan Clark (PE.New.PE29.8.3) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Tom Auger (PE.New.PE29.8.4) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Patrick McCartney (PE.New.PE29.8.5) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Chris Grebeldinger (PE.New.PE29.8.6) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Vicki Gagnon (PE.New.PE29.8.7) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Arcady Genkin (PE.New.PE29.8.8) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Lisa Stasyshyn (PE.New.PE29.8.9) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Lori Newton (PE.New.PE29.8.10) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Murray Lumley (PE.New.PE29.8.11) (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Frances Bartlett (PE.New.PE29.8.12) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Michael Black, Walk Toronto Steering Committee (PE.New.PE29.8.13) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-49276.pdf) (August 14, 2014) Letter from Sarah B. Hood (PE.New.PE29.8.14) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Judith Kidd (PE.New.PE29.8.15) (August 15, 2014) Submission from Kenneth Brown, Volunteer, Cycle Toronto (PE.New.PE29.8.16) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 15, 2014) E-mail from Jane Gulland (CC.Main.PE29.8.17)
|
| Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 35 |
| PG35.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| "Feeling Congested?" Recommended Official Plan Amendment for Selected Transportation Policies: Official Plan Comprehensive Review |
| Communications PG35.2.5 and PG35.2.6 have been submitted on this Item. Bill 1001 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment appended as Attachment 1 of the report (July 11, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the proposed Official Plan Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council declare by resolution to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing that the Official Plan Amendment set out in Attachment 1 of the report (July 11, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:
a. conforms with Provincial Plans or does not conflict with them; b. has regard to the matters of Provincial Interest listed in Section 2 of the Planning Act; and c. is consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3.1 of the Planning Act.
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to establish a measurement tool which outlines the benefits of moving towards sustainable transportation. |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report proposes an Official Plan Amendment to address the City's transportation policies covering the areas of: (1) Integration with Land Use; (2) Streets and "Complete Streets"; (3) Active Transportation; (4) Auto, Travel Demand Management (TDM) and Parking; and (5) Goods Movement. A further Official Plan Amendment is anticipated to be proposed in 2015 covering the remaining transportation policy areas, namely: development of a Comprehensive Rapid and Surface Transit Plan; introduction of a Cycling Policy Framework; and updates to Street Related Maps and Schedules.
The policy changes in the proposed Official Plan Amendment (see Attachment 1) have been informed by a broad inter-divisional, inter-agency and public review process. This consultation was undertaken over the past seven months as part of the “Feeling Congested?” initiative which, in turn, is part of the City’s larger, on-going Five Year Official Plan Review. Those consulted throughout the process were generally supportive of the proposed policies. Overall, the proposed Official Plan Amendment seeks to strengthen the integration of the City's land use and transportation policies, and to advance the Official Plan's city-building vision of creating sustainable and complete communities. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on "Feeling Congested?" Recommended Official Plan Amendment for Selected Transportation Policies: Official Plan Comprehensive Review
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71992.pdf) (June 30, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72215.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Dr. Kara Santokie, Toronto Women's Alliance |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Nancy Lea Smith, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (PG.Supp.PG35.2.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48829.pdf) (July 8, 2014) Letter from Regula Modlich on behalf of Toronto Women's City Alliance Planning Team (PG.Supp.PG35.2.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48831.pdf) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Michael Black (PG.Supp.PG35.2.3) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Dr. Kara Santokie, Director, Toronto Women's City Alliance (PG.New.PG35.2.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48951.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Submission from Hamish Wilson (CC.New.PG35.2.5)
(August 23, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.New.PG35.2.6) |
| PG35.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 25, 26, 34, 35, 37 |
| Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Phase 1 (Part 2) Implementation Report |
| Communications PG35.3.24 to PG35.3.30 have been submitted on this Item Bills 1022 and 1023 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. In relation to the Eglinton Connects Study Area, as shown in Attachment 1, and the zoning by-law, titled "To amend the Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, with respect to certain lands abutting Eglinton Avenue West and Eglinton Avenue East between Jane Street and Kennedy Road", found in Attachment 2 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Planning and Executive Director, City Planning, that City Council confirm that:
a. New laneways or laneway widenings would only occur through redevelopment and would have to be contained on the developer's property, not through expropriation on any adjacent properties; b. Any new laneways are for servicing and local access only; and c. No new Neighbourhood Transition Areas, in addition to the one at Eglinton and Caledonia, are recommended as part of this, or any other report.
2. City Council request that an additional round of community consultation be arranged through the local Councillor for Ward 26 and report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee in 2015;
3. City Council amend City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, former City of York By-law No. 1-83, former Town of Leaside By-law 1916, and former City of Toronto By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachment 2 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required; and
5. City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines for Eglinton Avenue attached as Attachment 3 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and direct City Planning staff to apply these guidelines to all new development applications in the study area through the Site Plan Control process. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Manager, Eglinton Connects Planning Study, City Planning, gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
Over the last two years, the Eglinton Connects Planning Study examined the future land uses, built form, public realm, and road layout for 19 kilometers of Eglinton Avenue in anticipation of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT, which is expected to open in 2020. Together with many stakeholders and communities along the corridor, a vision for the future of Eglinton Avenue was developed.
The study resulted in a Plan with 21 recommendations, which were adopted by City Council in May 2014, along with direction to consult further on initial implementation measures. Through a detailed study of local conditions and intensive feedback, a site by site strategy has emerged.
This report is the second implementation report related to the Eglinton Connects Planning Study. In July 2014, Council adopted the recommendations of the first implementation report, which included Official Plan Amendments comprised of site and area specific policies, land use changes, and laneway policies. City Council also adopted resolutions to implement the Streetscape Plan.
This report only deals with specific implementation measures related to mid rise buildings. It does not make any recommendations regarding rear laneways, road configurations, cycling infrastructure, Neighbourhood Transition Areas, or tall buildings.
Eglinton will not evolve as a continuous mid rise corridor, but rather, it will change incrementally according to local character and conditions. Of the 19 kilometres, approximately 8.6 kilometres or 45 percent will remain relatively stable, and no changes are recommended to existing land use or zoning permissions. These are Apartment Neighbourhoods, Open Spaces and the single-detached housing Neighbourhood section between Bayview Avenue and Laird Drive. Other areas, approximately 4.6 kilometres or 25 percent of the corridor, will require further study to determine appropriate land uses and built form, transportation infrastructure needs and community services and facility needs. These are the six Focus Areas (West Side, Dufferin, Bayview, Laird, Don Mills and the Golden Mile) and the two Mobility Hubs (Mount Dennis and Kennedy). The study did not include Yonge-Eglinton, which accounts for approximately 0.8 kilometres or 5 percent since the planning controls in place are specific to that Centre.
For the remaining 5.0 kilometres or 26 percent of the corridor, this report recommends zoning changes to permit appropriately scaled mid-rise buildings. The lands identified are based on local conditions and context including land use designations, the width of the street and existing lot depths.
Existing height permissions within the areas where zoning changes are proposed vary considerably from 11 metres, 3 storeys to 24 metres, 8 storeys. The study proposed new height limits based on the Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings adopted by Council in 2010 and existing lot depths. New height limits range from 13.5 metres, which translates to 4 storeys, to 25.5 metres, which translates to an 8 storey building. In some cases the height permissions will remain the same, in other cases the change allows increased permissions of 1 to 3 storeys.
The Performance Standards for Mid Rise Buildings direct a 1:1 ratio between the height of a building to the adjacent street right-of-way, so that a mid rise building is never taller than the street is wide. The portion of Eglinton Avenue where mid rise buildings are most appropriate has a 27 metre right-of-way width, which would permit buildings up to 27 metres in height. However, a number of factors including shallow lot depths, the need for rear angular planes to provide transition to the Neighbourhoods and required floor heights, prevent this height from being achieved. Therefore, the maximum heights proposed in the report range from 13.5 metres to 25.5 metres.
Site Plan Approval will continue apply as well as other City policies, guidelines and approvals.
In consultation with local residents and stakeholders, the study acknowledges that in some areas along the corridor such as the West Side focus area, the intersection around Don Mills, parts of the Golden Mile and the Mobility Hubs at Mount Dennis and Kennedy, taller buildings may be appropriate. However, consideration of tall buildings will be the subject of Phase 2 implementation measures, and are not part of this report.
Other changes to the City-wide zoning By-Law No. 569-2013 include refined building setbacks to achieve 4.8-metre sidewalk zones, the provision of a step-back above the fourth storey, and requirements for ground-floor retail in certain areas.
Finally, this report recommends zone category change in a limited number of areas to allow mixed-use buildings, a change from Policy Area 4 to Policy Area 3 to permit a small reduction in parking requirements for certain land uses, and removing minimum height, setback and other requirements for LRT station entrances. This report also recommends adoption of Urban Design Guidelines to implement matters not covered by the zoning changes. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Phase 1 (Part 2) Implementation Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72097.pdf) (July 16, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72216.pdf) Presentation on Eglinton Connects - Implementation Part 1 (Phase 2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72578.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Patrick Smyth, Director, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (July 18, 2014) E-mail from Richard Cassel (PG.Main.PG35.3.1)
(July 17, 2014) E-mail from Rob Cazzolli (PG.Main.PG35.3.2) (July 14, 2014) E-mail from Peter F. Kilborn (PG.Main.PG35.3.3) (July 8, 2014) E-mail from Phillip Silver (PG.Main.PG35.3.4) (July 25, 2014) E-mail from Fabio Rosa (PG.Supp.PG35.3.5) (July 24, 2014) E-mail from James Spencer (PG.Supp.PG35.3.6) (July 25, 2014) E-mail from Bob Keel, Partner, Keel Cottrelle LLP (PG.Supp.PG35.3.7) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48749.pdf) (August 5, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates representing Upper Village Investments Ltd. (PG.Supp.PG35.3.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48813.pdf) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Smyth, Director for and on behalf of (ARECA) Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (PG.Supp.PG35.3.9) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Shauna Corbin (PG.Supp.PG35.3.10) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners' Association (PG.Supp.PG35.3.11) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48826.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Parks Residents Association (PG.Supp.PG35.3.12) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48832.pdf) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from James Baker (PG.Supp.PG35.3.13) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited on behalf of Armel Corporation (PG.Supp.PG35.3.14) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48834.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited on behalf of Suncor Energy Products Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.3.15) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48835.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's (PG.Supp.PG35.3.16) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48836.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Neil M. Smiley, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, representing 2401 Eglinton Avenue West Ltd. (PG.Supp.PG35.3.17) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48847.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol Gold, representing 2004085 Ontario Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.3.18) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48849.pdf) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Shauna Corbin (PG.Supp.PG35.3.19) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Robert Dragicevic, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited, representing Skypod View Inc. (PG.New.PG35.3.20) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48918.pdf) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Jeffery Gross (PG.New.PG35.3.21) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Aaron Glassman (PG.New.PG35.3.22) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Toba Sheryl Lavine (PG.New.PG35.3.23) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc. regarding 333 Eglinton Avenue West (CC.Main.PG35.3.24)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49485.pdf) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc. regarding 313 Eglinton Avenue West (CC.Main.PG35.3.25) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49486.pdf) (August 22, 2014) Letter from Rizwan Jiwan (CC.Supp.PG35.3.26) (August 24, 2014) Letter from the Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto, Executive Team (CC.New.PG35.3.27) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49583.pdf) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Nadine C?t? (CC.New.PG35.3.28) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.PG35.3.29) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49613.pdf) (August 27, 2014) E-mail from E L Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.PG35.3.30) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49628.pdf) |
| PG35.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| South Niagara Planning Strategy - Final Report |
| Bills 1034 and 1036 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan and the Garrison Common North Secondary Plan for the lands known as the South Niagara Area, substantially in accordance with the Draft Official Plan Amendment 273, Attachment 4, attached to the report (July 10, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
2. City Council amend the Zoning By-law No. 438-86, as amended, for the lands known as 51-53 Strachan Avenue and 715, 801a and 805 Wellington Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law amendment, Attachment 5, attached to the report (July 10, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments as may be required;
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board amend Official Plan Amendment 199 to include policy related to the protection of views to and from Fort York National Historic Site in accordance with the policies of the South Niagara Planning Strategy and The Fort York Heritage Conservation District Plan and Study, with the wording of these proposed amendments being to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate City Officials;
5. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 on the potential to Designate the properties at 51-53 Strachan Avenue , 715, 801a, 805 Wellington Street West, 61-69 Niagara Street, and 677 Wellington Street, under the Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990;
6. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to study the opportunities for adaptively reusing the Wellington Destructor at 677 Wellington Street for cultural and community space, and community hub or other appropriate uses in consultation with city staff from Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning, Real Estate Services, Social Development, Finance and Administration, Transportation Services, the Ward Councillor and representatives from the local community;
7. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks Forestry and Recreation to explore the adaptive reuse of the city-owned Maple Green Inc. building at the lands known as 51-53 Strachan Avenue (including 715, 801a and 805 Wellington Street West), to contribute to the programming of the future park space; and
8. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with other City Divisions, Build Toronto, and the Ward Councillor, to report to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015, assessing the appropriateness of developing a Community Improvement Plan within the South Niagara Area to achieve community improvements, such as the adaptive reuse of the Wellington Destructor, the remediation of city-owned contaminated lands, parkland improvements, and other community improvements detailed in the South Niagara Strategy. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report details and recommends approval of Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments necessary to implement the South Niagara Planning Strategy.
In October 2013, the City Planning Division initiated a study of the lands bordered by Bathurst Street, Strachan Avenue, Wellington Street West, and the Metrolinx rail corridor. This area is in a state of transition from historically being used predominantly for industrial purposes, to introducing residential, commercial and office uses. This Strategy will ensure that these lands redevelop in a manner that balances city-wide policies with neighbourhood interests.
The study engaged area stakeholders, including landowners, residents and business owners, in a number of formats over four community consultation events.
This Strategy envisions the South Niagara Area as a mixed-use community, complementary to the existing Niagara Neighbourhood, providing a range of housing opportunities and new residentially compatible employment space, while protecting city works services, expanding existing park spaces, achieving new pedestrian, cycling and vehicle connections, and securing the preservation and adaptive-reuse of the area’s heritage resources, in a format which respects and transitions to the existing neighbourhood and the adjacent Fort York National Historic Site.
This report responds to City Council direction from its June 11, 12 and 13, 2013 meeting by providing a Strategy for the future development of the South Niagara |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 10, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on South Niagara Planning Strategy - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71922.pdf) (July 16, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71989.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached to motion 1 by Councillor Mike Layton
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73214.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Stephen Otto, Co-Chair, Friends of Fort York |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 5, 2014) Letter from Allan Leibel, Goodmans LLP, representing Two Tecumseth Street Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.4.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48821.pdf) (August 7, 2014) Letter from David Kendall (PG.New.PG35.4.2) |
| PG35.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| 150 Symes Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report |
| Bills 1046, 1047, 1048 and 1049 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 150 Symes Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 6 of the report (July 9, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 150 Symes Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 of the report (July 9, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council amend the former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the lands at 150 Symes Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 of the report (July 9, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the lands at 150 Symes Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 of the report (July 9, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner be required to provide an undertaking from the owner's solicitor to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor that the owner will withdraw the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of By-law No. 569-2013 as it relates to 150 Symes Road.
7. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner be required to provide adequate information to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Executive Director Building and Chief Building Official to confirm that Official Plan Policy 3.4.23 has been satisfactorily addressed. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee directed the City Solicitor, subject to Recommendations 6 and 7, to submit the necessary Bills for City Council consideration at the August 25, 2014 meeting. |
| Origin |
| (July 9, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws (City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83) to permit additional potentially sensitive non-residential uses on the lands at 150 Symes Road. A range of uses are proposed including office, light industrial, brewery, commercial school, clinic, indoor recreation uses such as a rock-climbing, fitness and dance, as well as multi-purpose rooms for art gallery and private event uses, including food service (indoors and outdoors). The proposed development would include the re-use of the existing heritage building and existing service garage, plus the addition of four new buildings on the west and north portions of the site.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 9, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 150 Symes Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71942.pdf) (July 16, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71986.pdf) |
| PG35.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19, 20 |
| Dupont Street Regeneration Area Study - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report |
| Communication PG35.6.14 has been submitted on this Item Bills 1002 and 1003 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Attachment 2, Policy 4.2 of the report (July 8, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning by adding the words "and establishment of value-added creative uses" following "non-residential unit sizes" so that it reads:
"4.2 A variety of employment types, including a range of non-residential unit sizes and establishment of value-added creative uses will be encouraged in every redevelopment."
2. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands located on the north side of Dupont Street as shown in Attachment 1 substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 2 of the report (July 8, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1.
3. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 3 of the report (July 8, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any required staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to support the draft Site and Area Specific Official Plan Policy and the area specific Zoning By-law attached as Attachments 2 and 3 of the report (July 8, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines attached as Attachment 4 of the report (July 8, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
7. City Council direct staff to update the City of Toronto Streetscape Manual as described in the report (July 8, 2014) the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning from and as shown in Attachment 6.
8. City Council direct City Planning staff to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the heritage attributes, and options for inclusion on the City's heritage inventory, of the following properties:
a. 888 Dupont Street; b. 420 Dupont Street; and c. 275 Albany Avenue.
9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee by the third quarter of 2015 on the following:
a. The inclusion in Zoning By-law 569-2013 of a required 30 metre setback from any rail corridor for any sensitive or high density uses citywide. b. The appropriate separation and mitigation requirements for the rest of the CP North Toronto Subdivision rail corridor. c. A framework for studying the appropriate separation and mitigation requirements for developments along the passenger rail corridors in the City.
10. City Council direct City Planning staff to arrange for a peer review of all development applications and associated rail safety and mitigation studies for proposed development adjacent to a rail corridor in the City, at the sole cost of the applicant.
11. City Council direct City Planning staff to establish a roster of consultants qualified to conduct the peer reviews required in Recommendation 9 above.
12. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to investigate the feasibility of transforming the remaining Hydro Corridor lands from Christie Street to Spadina Road into parkland and to identify recreational amenities that are compatible with the land conditions in consultation with the community. When opportunities are identified, and subject to funding as part of the Budget Process, City Council direct the Director, Real Estate Services to negotiate a license lease agreement with Hydro One.
13. City Council direct City staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillors, to allow the Section 42 cash in lieu funds in excess of 5 percent, generated from the 2014 Dupont Street study area (located in Wards 19 and 20), to be spent on either parkland improvement/acquisition projects in Wards 19 and 20 or parkland improvement/acquisition projects on the Greenline (located in Wards 17, 21 and 22).
14. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider installing cycling infrastructure on Howland Avenue, between Dupont Street and Bridgeman Avenue, in consultation with adjacent Ward Councillors. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
These City-initiated amendments propose a new Site and Area Specific Policy in the Official Plan and an area-specific Zoning By-law for the lands on the north side of Dupont Street between Kendal and Ossington Avenues. Staff were directed to complete a Regeneration Areas study of these lands through OPA 231 to determine if additional uses were appropriate, to define appropriate built form and streetscape details, and to review appropriate setbacks and mitigation measures from the rail corridor that abuts the Study Area. The study is now completed and this report recommends the adoption of a new Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policy, an area-specific Zoning By-law Amendment, and Urban Design Guidelines to guide development within the study area.
Since February 2014 staff have held 4 community consultation and 3 working group meetings, obtained direction from a rail consultant on rail safety and mitigation questions, and consulted with all relevant City agencies and divisions including landowners. The outcome of this process is an area specific amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law that includes the following:
- new residential permissions within a building envelope of 8-storeys (25 metres) outside the 30 metre setback from the rail corridor; - a requirement for a net-gain of non-residential gross floor area in the redevelopment of any site in the Study Area; - new rail separation and mitigation requirements; - policies to ensure an improved pedestrian environment along Dupont Street; - priorities for open space and parks improvements; and - an emphasis on the true mixed-use character of the Study Area including the importance of the city-serving uses found on Dupont Street.
This report also includes recommendations about further work that needs to be completed. The 'Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations' prepared for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Railway Association of Canada, recommended that municipalities should establish a minimum setback requirement for new development from rail corridors through a zoning by-law amendment. The City's rail consultant also recommended this. Further consideration of the freight and passenger lines throughout the entire City is required before such a by-law is brought forward. Lastly, additional study on the feasibility of extending the park network on the north side of the rail corridor, including using the Hydro corridor for this purpose, is work that the community has started and staff would like to further develop. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Dupont Street Regeneration Area Study - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71895.pdf) (July 8, 2014) Attachment 4: Urban Design Guidelines (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71896.pdf) (July 8, 2014) Attachment 5: Community Services and Facilities Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71897.pdf) (July 8, 2014) Attachment 6: Streetscape Manual detail for Dupont Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71898.pdf) (July 16, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71988.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Deborah Sawyer |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 2, 2014) E-mail from Richard Cassel (PG.Supp.PG35.6.1)
(August 5, 2014) Letter from Edward Leman, Co-Chair, Planning and Zoning Committee, Annex Residents? Association (PG.Supp.PG35.6.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48755.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mark Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, representing Palmetto Holdings Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.6.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48822.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc., representing Freed Developments Ltd. (PG.Supp.PG35.6.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48845.pdf) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Elissa McBride (PG.Supp.PG35.6.5) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Steven A. Zakem, Aird and Berlis, representing Sobeys Capital Incorporated (PG.Supp.PG35.6.6) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48840.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Steven A. Zakem, Aird and Berlis, representing RoseWater Management Group Limited (PG.Supp.PG35.6.7) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48851.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Eileen Costello, Aird and Berlis, representing CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited and Loblaw Properties Limited (PG.Supp.PG35.6.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48852.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mark Noskiewicz, Goodmans LLP, representing RioCan Holdings Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.6.9) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48861.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Anne Benedetti, Goodmans LLP, representing Leeken Investments, the owners of the property known as 275 Albany Avenue and 420 Dupont Street (PG.Supp.PG35.6.10) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48862.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Anne Benedetti, Goodmans LLP, representing Leeken Investments and 1753934 Ontario Limited, the owners of the property known municipally as 275, 281 and 283 Howland Avenue (PG.Supp.PG35.6.11) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48863.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (PG.Supp.PG35.6.12) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48864.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Professional Corporation, Davies Howe Partners LLP, representing 1095909 Ontario Limited (PG.Supp.PG35.6.13) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48865.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from W. R. Fleming (CC.Main.PG35.6.14)
|
| PG35.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:14 |
| Agreement Concerning the Display of Topiary Signs near the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, and Amendments to Chapter 694 and Chapter 441 of the Municipal Code with respect to Topiary Signs |
| Bills 967 and 973 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The security of the property of the municipality or local board. Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City an agreement with Hillside Media Communications Limited ("Agreement") described in the Attachment 1-Confidential Information of the report (July 24, 204) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor;
2. City Council direct that the Attachment 1-Confidential Information of the report (July 24, 204) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that pertains to litigation or potential litigation; and that the final Agreement between the City and Hillside Media Communications Limited be made public subject to applicable law, once it has been fully executed by all parties;
3. City Council direct the revenues from the Agreement to this report to the Public Realm Reserve Fund XR1410 to be drawn upon annually to provide funding for the "Orphan Space Program" to enhance the maintenance of lands within the public right-of-way under the jurisdiction of Transportation Services;
4. City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, by adding an area-specific amendment to Schedule B to Ch. 694, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments to allow the display of 14 Topiary Signs in the portion of the rail corridor known as the Oakville Subdivision bounded by Roncesvalles Avenue and Jameson Avenue in accordance with the draft by-law attached as Attachment 2 of the report (July 24, 204) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor;
5. City Council amend Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, of the Municipal Code of the City of Toronto to modify Appendix C - Schedule 8, Toronto Building to add a new fee for sign permits for topiary signs, and to modify related fees in accordance with the draft by-law attached as Attachment 3 of the report of the report (July 24, 204) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor; and,
6. The City Solicitor be authorized to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council in order to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-laws as may be required. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
This report recommends that the City enter into an agreement with Hillside Media Communications Limited ("Hillside") concerning the continued display of up to 14 topiary signs in the Metrolinx rail corridor near the F.G. Gardiner Expressway. This report also recommends amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, ("Chapter 694") to better govern the display of these topiary signs, as well as the addition of a new fee to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges ("Chapter 441") to recover the costs incurred in the review and inspection of topiary signs where sign permits may be required.
A topiary sign is defined by Chapter 694 as a sign consisting only of shrubs, grass, flowers, ornamental plants and landscape elements. Under Chapter 694, topiary signs are permitted in all sign districts without the requirement for a sign permit provided that they are no higher than 0.6m metres above grade and comply in all other respects with the requirements of Chapter 694. Several of the topiary signs recommended for approval in this report contain elements with a height greater than 0.6m above grade and therefore will require both an amendment to Chapter 694, and a subsequent sign permit in order to be allowed. This report also proposes the addition of a new sign permit fee for topiary signs to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges ("Chapter 441") to recover the costs incurred in the review and inspection of topiary signs when required.
For almost 30 years, Hillside has displayed topiary signs along the north side of the railway corridor adjacent to the Gardiner Expressway. These signs have been governed through various historic agreements which led to Hillside's displaying up to 14 topiary signs in exchange for the maintenance and upkeep of the property where they are located as well as the display of the City of Toronto logo and two other topiary signs displaying non-commercial or charitable messages.
This report has been prepared in consultation with Transportation Services, and the City Manager's Office. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the City Solicitor on the Agreement Concerning the Display of Topiary Signs near the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, and Amendments to Chapter 694 and Chapter 441 of the Municipal Code with respect to Topiary Signs
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71948.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Attachment 1 - Confidential Attachment from the City Solicitor (July 24, 2014) Attachment 2 - Draft Bylaw - Area Specific Amendment to Chapter 694, Oakville Subdivision bounded by Roncesvalles Avenue and Jameson Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72095.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Attachment 3 - Draft Bylaw - Amendments to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, of the Municipal Code of the City of Toronto, Appendix C - Schedule 8, Toronto Building (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72096.pdf) (July 30, 2014) Public Notice (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72364.pdf) |
| PG35.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Proposed Area-Specific Amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with Respect to Ricoh Coliseum and BMO Field and a Portion of Exhibition Place |
| Bill 971 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the request to amend Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, of Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to allow for, within the specified portion of the premises known as Exhibition Place, the display of two third party roof signs with electronic static copy and static copy to be located on the Coliseum Building commonly known as "Ricoh Coliseum", a three-sided third party ground sign with two sign faces displaying electronic static copy and a sign face displaying electronic static copy, located on the north side of the existing scoreboard structure at BMO Field, subject to conditions specified, including the removal of the specified existing signs, and the restriction on illumination to a maximum of 300 nits between sunset and sunrise, and no illumination between 12:00 a.m. (midnight) and 6:00 a.m., substantially in accordance with the draft by-law provided as Attachment 1of the report (July 23, 2014) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building; and
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-laws as may be required. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building |
| Summary |
This report reviews and makes recommendations for an area-specific amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 694, Signs, General (Chapter 694), made on behalf of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLS&E). This item is before the Planning and Growth Management Committee as the signage contemplated is directly related to and impacted by the renovation and expansion of BMO Field.
MLS&E proposes an area-specific amendment to Chapter 694 to allow for the alteration of three existing signs and the installation of one new sign face on the existing scoreboard for the stadium. The proposal is a component of the soccer stadium ("BMO Field") expansion and will help to support that project. The existing signs pre-date Chapter 694 and, as a result, are not required to comply with the current standards for lighting intensity and hours of operation. The existing ground sign located near BMO Field has been the subject of many complaints from area residents. The amendments proposed by MLS&E will make all of the signs subject to the provisions of Chapter 694.
It is the recommendation of staff that the proposed signs be approved as they represent an improvement when compared with the existing signs. If approved, the proposal will result in signage that will operate with levels of illumination which are below the current requirements in Chapter 694 and which will be turned off between midnight and 6:00 a.m. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on the Proposed Area-Specific Amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with Respect to Ricoh Coliseum and BMO Field and a Portion of Exhibition Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72177.pdf) (July 23, 2014) Attachment 1 - Draft Amending By-law (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72213.pdf) (July 23, 2014) Attachment 2 - Applicant's Submission Package (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72214.pdf) (July 30, 2014) Public Notice (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72363.pdf) |
| PG35.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| 440 Dufferin Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the proposed applications for 440 Dufferin Street.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps as required to implement the foregoing.
3. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board a Draft Zoning By-law and an executed Section 37 agreement to the satisfaction of the City. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This application proposes a mixed-use building containing 402 residential units (29,391 square metres) and 6,794 square metres of non-residential gross floor area at 440 Dufferin Street. The application has been revised since the initial submission including a re-massing of the building from a podium and tower typology to a long, midrise typology, and includes an increase in the proposed amount of non-residential gross floor area, the consolidation of access to the site and a slight reduction in the overall gross floor area of the site. The application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and a pre-hearing is scheduled for Tuesday October 21, 2014.
This application was also considered as part of the recent Municipal Comprehensive Review, the results of which were adopted by City Council through Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 231. OPA 231 retains the lands at 440 Dufferin Street as Employment Areas, and designates them as Core Employment Areas. The proposed mixed-use building is contrary to this Council decision.
This report requests direction from City Council to oppose the proposed development at the OMB. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 10, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 440 Dufferin St - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71952.pdf) |
| PG35.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:35 |
| 743 Warden Avenue - Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan Control - Request for Direction Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the proposed applications for 743 Warden Avenue.
2. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board a Draft Zoning By-law and an executed Section 37 agreement to the satisfaction of the City.
3. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan Control applications for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board conditions of approval for each to the satisfaction of the City.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps as required to implement the foregoing. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
The owners of the property at 743 Warden Avenue have appealed their applications to amend the City of Toronto Official Plan and the former City of Scarborough Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982, as well as their applications for a Plan of Subdivision and for Site Plan Control to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), due to City Council's failure to make a decision within the time allotted by the Planning Act.
These applications propose a 202 unit residential townhouse subdivision of three-storey dwellings fronting onto new public streets and served by new public lanes, on vacant employment lands immediately north of the Warden Woods community within the Golden Mile Employment Area. A commercial component is also proposed, consisting of three commercial buildings fronting onto Warden Avenue.
This report requests direction from City Council to oppose the proposed development at the OMB.
743 Warden Avenue was also considered at the owners' request as part of the recent Municipal Comprehensive Review, the results of which were adopted by City Council through Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 231. OPA 231 retains the lands at 743 Warden Avenue as Employment Areas, and designates them as General Employment Areas. The proposed townhouse component of the development is contrary to this Council decision. OPA 231 was approved by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on July 9, 2014. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 743 Warden Avenue - Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, Plan of Subdivision and Site Plan Control - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71935.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Jason Park, Dentons Canada LLP, representing The Goldman Group, Zahavish Downtown Developments Ltd. and Zahavish Downtown Commercial Ltd. (PG.Supp.PG35.10.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48838.pdf) |
| PG35.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:37 |
| 1001 Ellesmere Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Planning staff to meet with the Applicant to discuss resolution of the inconsistency between the Official Plan Amendment 231 and the Applicant's Official Plan Amendment application prior to the Applicant being requested to submit revised applications.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision applications at 1001 Ellesmere Road in their current form and to achieve consistency with Official Plan Amendment No. 231.
3. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board a Draft Zoning By-law and an executed Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City.
4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Plan of Subdivision application for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board with conditions of approval to the satisfaction of the City.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps as required to implement the foregoing. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
The owners of the property at 1001 Ellesmere Road have appealed their applications to amend the City of Toronto Official Plan and the former City of Scarborough Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982, as well as their application for Draft Plan of Subdivision approval to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), due to City Council's failure to make a decision within the time allotted by the Planning Act.
These applications propose redevelopment of this former industrial site at 1001 Ellesmere Road with 95, three-storey townhouses on four blocks (the easterly block adjacent to the SRT /GO lines indicated to become a common elements condominium), a 4-storey 11 475m2 office/commercial building on the west portion of the site with predominantly underground parking, and 3 new public streets with 2 new rear public lanes.
This report requests direction from City Council to oppose the proposed development at the OMB in its current form.
1001 Ellesmere Road was also considered at the owners' request as part of the recent Municipal Comprehensive Review. Through OPA 231 adopted in December 2013, City Council retained the west half of the subject lands as Employment Areas and designated them as General Employment Areas, while redesignating the east half of the site to Mixed Use Areas. The extent of the proposed townhouse component of the development currently exceeds the Mixed Use Areas designation approved by Council. OPA 231 was approved by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on July 9, 2014. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 1001 Ellesmere Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71938.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Jason Park, Dentons Canada LLP, representing The Goldman Group and Goldman Ellesmere 2 Developments Inc. (PG.Supp.PG35.11.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48839.pdf) |
| PG35.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:33 |
| 2135 Sheppard Avenue East and 299 Yorkland Boulevard Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Request for Direction Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1 City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) with respect to 2135 Sheppard Avenue East and 299 Yorkland Boulevard and support the proposal described in this report dated July 10, 2014 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, subject to addressing the conditions in this report and any outstanding matters that may arise through the review of the July 3, 2014 re-submission.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its final Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as:
a. An appropriate Zoning By-law amendment is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and loading standards, maximum building heights, building transition, maximum building floor plates and envelopes, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, phasing, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity area, bicycle parking spaces, and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. The Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor requiring the Owner to:
i. Provide a cash contribution of $1,000,000 to be used towards streetscape improvements within the Consumers Business Park in the immediate vicinity of the site;
ii. Provide a cash contribution of $850,000 for capital improvements to the Pleasant View Toronto Public Library, which includes funds for a Digital Innovation Hub within the Library;
iii. Provide a cash contribution of $575,000 to be used towards capital improvements to community facilities within the area bounded by Highway 401, Highway 404, Van Horne Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue;
iv. Provide a cash contribution of $535,000 to be used towards parks improvements to Clydesdale Park, Van Horne Park, Muirhead Park, Old Sheppard Park and/or Pleasant View Park; and
v. Provide a cash contribution of $40,000 to be used towards streetscape improvements at the northwest and northeast corners of Brian Drive and Sheppard Avenue East;
The contributions indicated in parts iii., iv. and v. are to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development, the contribution indicated in part ii. is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the second building and the contribution indicated in part i. is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade permit for the third building. All amounts are to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.
The following matter is to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
vi. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measure of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.
c. The Owner addressing comments from the appropriate agencies and City Divisions resulting from the circulation of the July 3, 2013 re-submission from the applicant to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with Director, Community Planning, North York District; and
d. The Owner submitting a Plan of Subdivision application to secure all matters relating to the public road and parkland including above base park improvements.
3. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of Above Base Park Improvements to a proposed 2,160m² park to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve any issues that may arise from the circulation of the July 3, 2014 re-submission from the applicant and, if necessary, seek further instructions from Council regarding any outstanding matters to be resolved prior to the OMB hearing. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
The applications propose an amendment to the Official Plan Employment Areas designation for the site and the Zoning By-law to permit a mixed use development with residential, retail and other commercial uses. The proposal comprises a 4-storey stand alone retail building, including a large format use, located along the Sheppard Avenue/Consumers Road frontage and three residential buildings along the southern portion of the site with building heights of 26, 34 and 43 storeys. The development proposes a total gross floor area of 82,907m² including 1,100 dwelling units, 18,746m² of retail/office space, 1,557 parking spaces, 899 bicycle parking spaces, a new public road and a 2,160m2 public park. The total gross floor area results in an overall site density of 3.95 FSI.
On April 3, 2014, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act.
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s direction on the appeals and authorization for the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the applications subject to the conditions outlined in the report.
The site has been reviewed through the 5-Year Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Official Plan. City Council supported the conversion of the lands from Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas through Official Plan Amendment 231. The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) must approve the Official Plan Amendment and did so on July 9, 2014.
The applications were under review at the time of the appeal. Since that time the applicant has been working with staff to address outstanding design matters and technical requirements. A revised submission was received on July 3, 2014 and is currently under review.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve any issues that may arise from the circulation of the July 3, 2014 re-submission for finalized comments and, if necessary, seek further instructions from Council regarding any matters to be resolved prior to the OMB hearing. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2135 Sheppard Avenue East and 299 Yorkland Boulevard Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71930.pdf) |
| PG35.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Proposed Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct staff to consult with the public and stakeholders on financial and planning incentives to support replacement of office space, based on the proposals shown in Attachment 1 of the report (July 23, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Corporate Finance; and
2. City Council direct staff to report further to Planning and Growth Management Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on the results of the consultation. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture Director, Corporate Finance |
| Summary |
This report proposes that City staff consult with the public and the development industry on incentives to support the replacement of office space proposed to be demolished or repurposed to make way for residential development in areas near transit stations that are designated Mixed Use Areas or Regeneration Areas. The proposed consultation would take place over the course of the fall and winter 2014-2015. The report responds to a request from Council when it approved Official Plan Amendment 231, the Official Plan's economic and employment policies, in December 2013.
This report presents some incentives for discussion, including: - Financial incentives that would be payable as grants equivalent to all or a portion of the municipal property taxes on existing space that is being replaced and/or the new replacement office space; - Planning incentives including reduced parking requirements and exemptions from the density calculations for the replacement space; and - Priority processing under Goldstar for the development application.
Full details of the incentives proposed for discussion are presented in Attachment 1.
The incentives address the 'gap' between, on one hand, the value of the land for residential towers rather than office buildings, along with the cost of building new space, and, on the other, the value of the rents that the existing or new office space can command in the market. Their goal is to keep office jobs in the City.
The current IMIT program also provides incentives for new office development, through TIEGs (grants equivalent to the municipal property tax increment yielded by the new development). The present IMIT program will be reviewed in 2016, and the consultation for the proposals presented in this report will inform that fuller review. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Corporate Finance on the Proposed Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72136.pdf) |
| PG35.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6, 9, 10, 19, 20, 39 |
| Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Regeneration Area Studies Status Report |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (July 3, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for information. |
| Origin |
| (July 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report provides a status update on the seven Regeneration Area studies that resulted from City Council's decision on Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 231.
Regeneration Areas are unique areas of the City that present an opportunity to attract investment, re-use buildings, encourage new construction and bring life to the streets. These areas are key to the Official Plan's population and employment growth strategy and offer the opportunity to reintegrate underutilized areas of the City. Each Regeneration Area requires a tailor-made planning framework to help guide future growth that is informed by community consultation and a detailed planning study.
In advance of a decision from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on OPA 231, City Planning staff initiated six of the seven Regeneration Area studies. Two studies are completed and are the subject of statutory public meetings before Planning and Growth Management Committee at its meeting on August 7, 2014. Staff are targeting the completion of the remaining initiated studies and reporting out on these studies in the first half of 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 3, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Regeneration Area Studies Status Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71944.pdf) |
| PG35.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Official Plan Review: Draft Environmental Policies |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the draft Official Plan policies appended to the report (July 11, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in Attachments 1 and 2 to be used as the basis for public consultation.
2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to conduct open house(s) in each community council district of the City and continue to meet with key stakeholders including the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD), to obtain comments and feedback regarding the draft changes to the policies contained in Attachments 1 and 2 of the report (July 11, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council direct City Planning staff to report back in the second quarter of 2015 on the findings of the public consultation and proposed policies which will form the basis of further consultation. |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report presents draft environmental policies for the purpose of public consultation as part of the Five Year Review of the Official Plan. While the City has achieved significant success under the existing Official Plan policies, amendments are required in order to fulfill Council's objectives with respect to climate change and to bring the Official Plan into conformity with the 2014 Provincial Policy statement. Statements and maps that address the City's conformity requirements under the provincial Greenbelt Act are also included.
The report outlines draft policies intended to assist the City in meeting the challenges presented by climate change as well as updating policies for energy conservation and efficiency, biodiversity, natural heritage, hazard lands, environmentally significant areas, provincially significant areas, lakefilling and green infrastructure. Updated sidebars that provide further information and background regarding the City's environmental initiatives as well as proposed updates to portions of the Official Plan's text are also proposed.
Taken together, the draft policies are intended to strengthen and build upon the strong environmental vision contained throughout the Official Plan and enhance the policy framework to enable the City to continue being a leader in environmental initiatives over the coming decades.
The draft policies have been formulated to incorporate and implement Council motions and directives regarding the City's natural environment and climate change requirements. They also address issues raised as a result of feedback received at the initial series of public open houses at the commencement of the Five Year Review of the Official Plan in the fall of 2011, consultations with numerous divisional internal stakeholders within the City as well as with our partners the Toronto Region and Conservation Authority (TRCA). Attachment 1 to this report shows the draft policies incorporated into the current Official Plan's text and policies. Attachment 2 shows the proposed draft policies on their own. Following conclusion of the consultation on the draft policies, staff will report back in early 2015 on the results of the consultation and will present proposed policies for Committee and Council's consideration. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report and Attachments 1- 4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Official Plan Review: Draft Environmental Policies
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-71970.pdf) |
| PG35.21 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16, 22, 25 |
| Midtown in Focus - Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan for the Yonge-Eglinton Area |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan and support the strategies and initiatives identified in this plan, in order to inform current and future development applications to begin the implementation of the identified priority improvements to achieve the vision for the Yonge-Eglinton public realm through the improvement of the quality, quantity and character of parks, open spaces and streets within the area;
2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to establish and lead an interdivisional staff team to prepare an Implementation Strategy for Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape. The staff team should include: Transportation Services, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Toronto Water, Real Estate Services, Engineering and Construction Services, Finance and Economic Development. Staff from other agencies will also be consulted in the preparation of the Implementation Strategy, including: Toronto Public Library Board, TTC, Metrolinx, Toronto Hydro and Toronto District School Board;
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, General Manager, Transportation Services, and General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to jointly undertake the Implementation Strategy, set out in Recommendation 2 above, to study the feasibility and establish the priorities of the ten "Quick Win" projects identified in the Midtown in Focus, and provide an overall strategy for the timing, prioritizing and necessary approvals for consideration in future capital budget processes;
4. City Council request that upon completion of both the Implementation Strategy for the Midtown in Focus initiative and the feasibility study for the ten "Quick Win" projects, that the Chief Financial Officer and Deputy City Manager identify a capital financing strategy that will include the coordination of capital funding, for Council's consideration as part of future capital budget processes; and
5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prepare draft amendments to the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan to implement the Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan which support the Midtown in Focus Plan objectives and include:
a. A new public realm structure plan identifying the Five Place-making Moves; b. Clarification of polices related to the impacts of private developments on the public realm; c. An enhanced parkland acquisition strategy; and d. Section 37 implementation priorities. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report presents the recommendations of the Midtown in Focus, Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan.
The City Planning Division began a study of Yonge-Eglinton's public realm in 2013. The firm Public Work in consultation with Swerhun Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, and Quadrangle was retained to undertake the Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan for the Yonge-Eglinton Study Area — branded during the course of the study as the Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan. Integral to the consultant team’s work program was an extensive public engagement component that included community walks, public meetings, stakeholder meetings, and digital media.
The Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan is a master plan for the public realm. It establishes a comprehensive vision and presents a flexible, phased approach for improving the parks, open spaces and streetscapes to create a high quality public realm for the Yonge-Eglinton study area. The plan is responsive not only to current community needs, but also to anticipated growth and change. The Midtown in Focus Plan is a guide for creating more liveable, walkable and memorable public spaces within Midtown at Yonge and Eglinton.
An Executive Summary is attached as Attachment 1 to this report.
The Midtown in Focus Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan is available on the City's website at: http://www.toronto.ca/planning/midtowninfocus |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Midtown in Focus - Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Plan for the Yonge-Eglinton Area
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72138.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Ben Daube, President, The Sherwood Park Residents' Association (PG.Supp.PG35.21.1)
(August 6, 2014) E-mail from Michael Black, Ward Captain, Cycle Toronto Midtown (PG.Supp.PG35.21.2) |
| PG35.23 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:39 |
| McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study |
| City Council has removed this item from the jurisdiction of the Planning and Growth Management Committee and brought the item forward for Council's consideration. The Toronto Transit Commission has submitted a letter on this matter. (See MM55.75a) Communications PG35.23.12 to PG35.23.32 have been submitted on this matter (Previously distributed under Item MM55.75) |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee deferred consideration of this item to the next Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting in the new term of Council in 2015. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) |
| Summary |
At its meeting on Wednesday, July 23, 2014 the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) considered the attached report entitled, “McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study” and forwarded to the Planning and Growth Committee for consideration of the Commission's request. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 24, 2014) Letter and from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) on the McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72002.pdf) (July 23, 2014) Attachment 1 - Toronto Transit Commission - Report No. 8(a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72340.pdf) (August 6, 2014) McNicoll Bus Garage - Frequently Asked Questions (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-72563.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission on McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study Removal of Matter from Committee (MM55.75a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73139.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Patricia Sinclair, Coalition Member, Against Bus Garage |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 2, 2014) Letter from Patricia Sinclair, Ward 39, Member of the Coalition Against the TTC McNicoll Bus Garage (PG.Supp.PG35.23.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48752.pdf) (August 5, 2014) Letter from Christopher Williams, Partner, Aird and Berlis, representing the Mon Sheong Foundation (PG.Supp.PG35.23.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48811.pdf) (August 4, 2014) Letter from May Wong, President, Villa Elegance (PG.Supp.PG35.23.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48814.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Agnes Luk (PG.Supp.PG35.23.4) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Helen Leung, Chief Executive Officer, Carefirst (PG.Supp.PG35.23.5) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48825.pdf) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Kenneth Plummer, Vice-President, Bamburgh Manor Residence (Coaliton Against TTC Bus Garage) (PG.Supp.PG35.23.6) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48841.pdf) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Sanson Yee (PG.Supp.PG35.23.7) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Richard Leung, Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church (PG.Supp.PG35.23.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48853.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Lisa Chan (PG.Supp.PG35.23.9) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48903.pdf) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair (PG.Supp.PG35.23.10) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Jim Karygiannis (PG.New.PG35.23.11) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Christopher J. Williams, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.New.PG35.23.12)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49826.pdf) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Agnes Luk (CC.New.PG35.23.13) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Olivia Koo (CC.New.PG35.23.14) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Karen Fung - With attached petition signed by approximately 185 persons. (CC.New.PG35.23.15) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Alice Leung, Property Manager, Brookfield Residential Services on behalf of MTCC1278 - Villa Elegance - With attached petition signed by approximately 105 persons. (CC.New.PG35.23.16) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair (CC.New.PG35.23.17) (August 24, 2014) E-mail from May Wong (CC.New.PG35.23.18) (August 4, 2014) E-mail from May Wong, President, Villa Elegance, Board of Directors (CC.New.PG35.23.19) (August 5, 2014) Letter from John Verdone, The Brighton Convention & Event Centre (CC.New.PG35.23.20) (August 24, 2014) Letter from Lisa Chan (CC.New.PG35.23.21) (August 24, 2014) Submission from Coalition Against McNicoll Bus Garage (CC.New.PG35.23.22) (August 24, 2014) Letter from Kenneth Plummer, Vice President, Bamburgh Manor Residence (CC.New.PG35.23.23) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from John Verdone, The Brighton Convention & Event Centre (CC.New.PG35.23.24) (August 25, 2014) Submission from Vincent Ching, Chair, Board of Directors, Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church (CC.New.PG35.23.25) (August 26, 2014) Letter from Jim Karygiannis (CC.New.PG35.23.26) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Vincent Ching, Chair, Board of Directors, Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church (CC.New.PG35.23.27) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Sanson Yee (CC.New.PG35.23.28) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Sanson Yee (CC.New.PG25.23.29) (August 27, 2014) E-mail from Olivia Koo (CC.New.PG35.23.30) (August 27, 2014) Submission from Nelson Wong (CC.New.PG35.23.31) (August 28, 2014) E-mail from Ivan Hon (CC.New.PG35.23.32) |
| Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 33 |
| PW33.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Status Update: Improving Safety for Bicycle Commuters |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council express its support to the Ontario Minister of Transportation for the reintroduction of Bill 173 Keeping Ontario Roads Safe Act.
2. City Council request the Ontario Minister of Transportation to:
a. liaise with the staff working group on the Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7 to improve safety for cyclists in construction zones; and
b. include a comprehensive section on vehicle-bicycle interaction in the Ontario Driver's Manual and also include this in new driver examinations.
3. City Council request the Ontario Minister of Education to make bicycle safety training part of primary school curriculum. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Commissioner, Toronto Film, Television and Digital Media, to examine the current practices with respect to film permit parking in bike lanes and include the findings and any recommendations in their report in spring 2015. |
| Origin |
| (May 21, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services |
| Summary |
This report provides a status update, as requested by Public Works and Infrastructure Committee at its meeting on April 9, 2014, on work currently underway on several cycling safety policies and initiatives in response to the report titled "Improving Safety for Bicycle Commuters in Toronto" (HL23.7), which was adopted by Council at its meeting on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013. These cycling safety initiatives include:
- the Province's proposed 1-metre passing rule; - policy/guideline for ensuring protection of cyclists in construction areas; - the “Watch for Bikes” program; - side guards on large trucks; - treatment of bikeways at intersections; and - winter maintenance in bicycle lanes. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (May 21, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Status Update: Improving Safety for Bicycle Commuters
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-71456.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (June 17, 2014) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.Main.PW33.1.1)
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Layton, Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Councillor Wong-Tam, Councillor Matlow, Councillor Mihevc, Councillor Fragedakis, Councillor Ramkhalawansingh, Councillor McConnell, Councillor Bail?o, Councillor Fletcher (PW.New.PW33.1.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-49262.pdf) |
| PW33.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Authority to Designate Construction Zones and Reduction of Speed Limits in Designated Construction Zones |
| Bill 977 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council appoint and authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, for the purpose of Subsection 128(8.1) of the Highway Traffic Act to designate sections of municipal roads and highways as construction zones.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to reduce speed limits in accordance with Appendix A to the report (July 15, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, in construction zones designated by the General Manager, Transportation Services, and to incorporate a definition of construction zones as deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Transportation Services, if necessary.
3. City Council direct the appropriate City Officials to prepare the necessary bills to make such by-law amendments as may be required to give effect to Council’s decision. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services |
| Summary |
City Council or Community Council approval is currently required to reduce speed limits in construction zones. Due to the temporary nature of construction, it is not always possible to plan for Council review of temporary speed limit reductions, resulting in posted signage being advisory in nature, and unenforceable.
This report recommends changes to City bylaws and to authorizations, pursuant to the Highway Traffic Act, so that speed limits in construction zones can be reduced when necessary and the reduced speed limits can be enforced. The required changes include appointing and authorizing the General Manager, Transportation Services, to temporarily designate a highway or portion of highway as a construction zone, and amending Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to reduce speed limits in designated construction zones by 10 or 20 kilometres per hour, depending on the normal speed limit.
The General Manager, Transportation Services, would determine whether these speed limits are appropriate and necessary for a given construction zone based on provincial guidelines, and would “designate” areas as construction zones accordingly. These changes would improve traffic safety and safety for workers by making construction zone speed limits legally enforceable. The reduced speed limits would not take effect until after the installation of construction zone signs and speed limit signs, in accordance with the requirements of the Highway Traffic Act and regulations. Designated construction zones would also be listed and/or illustrated on the City website. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Authority to Designate Construction Zones and Reduction of Speed Limits in Designated Construction Zones
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72345.pdf) |
| PW33.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743 - New or Replacement Toronto Hydro Pole Sidewalk Encroachments |
| Bill 965 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of, to exempt Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited, Toronto Energy Services Inc., and Toronto Hydro Corporation from Subsection 743-31E(1) where the General Manager, Transportation Services, determines that compliance with this subsection, when placing a new or replacement hydro pole, would create a pedestrian pinch point. |
| Origin |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services |
| Summary |
This report proposes an amendment to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of, by exempting new or replacement Toronto Hydro poles from the current requirement found in Subsection 743-31E(1) that the poles be set back 0.5 metres from the curb when compliance with this by-law requirement would create a pedestrian pinch point.
In older parts of the City with limited right-of-way and narrow sidewalks, Toronto Hydro poles are usually placed directly beside the curb or between the sidewalk and adjacent properties in order to ensure accessibility. The recently consolidated Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of, prohibits encroachments, other than soft landscaping, from being within 0.5 metres of the curb line of any road with a speed limit of 60 km/hr or less.
Since the new standard was adopted, staff have supported a site-specific Council exemption from this provision for road reconstruction on Front Street and also observed more recent examples of Toronto Hydro pole replacements/upgrades which, in adhering to the new standard, have created pedestrian pinch points on sidewalks. In order to ensure accessibility for all residents, this amendment would grant the General Manager of Transportation Services the ability to exempt Toronto Hydro from this provision, where City staff have identified accessibility issues. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743 - New or Replacement Toronto Hydro Pole Sidewalk Encroachments
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72312.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from David S. Crawford, Streetscape, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (PW.New.PW33.3.1)
|
| PW33.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:14, 19, 20, 28 |
| King Street Streetcar - Operational Study (Interim Report) |
| Communication PW33.5.1 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure recommends that:
1. City Council advise the Toronto Transit Commission that it supports the introduction of the rear door, effective Proof of Payment loading on all streetcar routes to reduce passenger service delays as soon as possible with a proper business plan subject to the 2015 budget. |
| Origin |
| (July 25, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services |
| Summary |
The King Street streetcar is the Toronto Transit Commission's busiest surface transit route carrying approximately 60,000 passengers on an average weekday. Recognizing the importance of this key transit route in the City's transportation system, the General Manager, Transportation Services, was requested by City Council to assess the feasibility and merits of implementing morning rush hour reserved streetcar lanes on King Street in order to improve the service and reliability of the streetcar operations.
This report provides the status of the ongoing data collection, the results of preliminary analysis completed to date, and an outline of the operational improvements currently being considered to improve streetcar service on King Street. A report documenting the final results of this study and any recommended measures to improve streetcar service will be submitted to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in 2015. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 25, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 - 5 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on King Street Streetcar - Operational Study (Interim Report)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72344.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Alan Yule |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Mark Earley (PW.New.PW33.5.1)
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Perks, Councillor Layton, Councillor Ramkhalawansingh, Councillor McConnell (PW.New.PW33.5.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-49263.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.New.PW33.5.1)
|
| PW33.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Ceremonial Street Dedication in Honour of Nelson Mandela |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council ceremonially dedicate University Avenue, from Front Street West to College Street, in honour of Nelson Mandela.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to alter the street name signs on University Avenue, from Front Street West to College Street, to reflect both the official street name and the ceremonial name "Nelson Mandela Boulevard".
3. City Council request that efforts be made to install this signage prior to the first anniversary of Nelson Mandela's passing on December 5, 2014.
4. City Council request the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Director, Protocol Services, to report to the Executive Committee in 2015 with recommendations to amend the "Honourific and Street Naming Policy" to include a specific policy to address ceremonial street dedications such as the one requested by City Council for Nelson Mandela. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to respond to City Council's direction for the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee concerning the dedication of a prominent street, or part thereof, in honour of Nelson Mandela.
A street dedication does not change the official street name or address information. This ceremonial street dedication would only see the installation of special signage along the selected street. While the City does have an "Honourific and Street Naming Policy", there is currently no approved process or policy for identifying the availability, suitability, and appropriate location for ceremonial dedications. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, on Ceremonial Street Dedication in Honour of Nelson Mandela
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72381.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Lloyd McKell, Co-Chair, Mandela Legacy Committee |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam and Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (PW.New.PW33.8.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-48901.pdf) (August 8, 2014) Letter from Lloyd McKell, Co-Chair, Mandela Legacy Committee (PW.New.PW33.8.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-48896.pdf) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Zeib Jeeva, Treasurer, Mandela Legacy Committee - Canada (PW.New.PW33.8.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-48979.pdf) (August 13, 2014) Letter from Gary Pieters, President, Urban Alliance on Race Relations, on behalf of the Board of Directors (PW.New.PW33.8.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-49067.pdf) |
| PW33.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Transfer of Street Lighting to Toronto Hydro in Previously Assumed Subdivisions |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting systems constructed within the previously assumed Subdivisions, listed in Attachment 1 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to request Council authorization for the City to transfer ownership of the street lighting systems within certain previously assumed Plans of Subdivision to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
A specific Council recommendation authorizing staff to undertake this transfer is included in assumption reports that are presented to Council but was not included in some of the reports between 2006 and 2010. Adoption of the recommendations of this report will give staff the authority to proceed with the transfer of street lighting systems for these previously assumed subdivisions. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Transfer of Street Lighting to Toronto Hydro in Previously Assumed Subdivisions
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72339.pdf) |
| PW33.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Capital Works Administrative Procedure Change to Support the Acceleration of the Basement Flooding Protection Program |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, through Program Management Engineering Consulting Assignment agreements for the Basement Flooding Protection Program, to appoint professional engineering consultants as agents of the City for the purposes of approving, committing the City to and signing on behalf of the City, construction contract change orders, where the:
a. change order does not exceed $25,000 and is within the contingency allowance of the contract;
b. change in scope of work, resulting in the change order request, was not foreseeable at the time of the engineering design;
c. change order request is not attributed to an error or omission on the part of the engineering design consultant. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services |
| Summary |
This report responds to the need to expand and accelerate the capital delivery of Toronto Water’s Basement Flooding Protection Program (the "Program"). An expanded program management capital delivery model is being proposed, where engineering consultants, under contract to deliver this Program, would be granted authority to act as agents of the City to approve routine construction contract change orders, up to pre-defined limits, and thereby free up in-house professional engineering staff resources to provide the necessary oversight and management of the expanded Program. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Capital Works Administrative Procedure Change to Support the Acceleration of the Basement Flooding Protection Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72352.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Tom Angellotti |
| PW33.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Source Water Protection Plan for City of Toronto Water Treatment Plants: Update |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council confirm, to the Ontario Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, its endorsement of the Lake Ontario policies, intended to protect the drinking water source for the City of Toronto, Region of Peel, and the Region of Durham, and contained in the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region, Central Ontario (CTC) Source Water Protection Plan submitted to the Ontario Minister of the Environment on October 22, 2012, and updated at the CTC Source Protection Committee meeting of June 24, 2014.
2. City Council request the City Manager to write to the Deputy Minister of Environment and Climate Change, strongly indicating that the Ontario Ministry has a duty to protect and enhance the near shore water quality of Lake Ontario; and to request that the Ontario Ministry acknowledge its responsibility as the “Implementing Body” for the purpose of the Lake Ontario policies contained in the CTC Source Water Protection Plan.
3. City Council forward a copy of the report (July 28, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to Councils of municipalities located along the north shore of Lake Ontario and which operate water treatment facilities that rely on Lake Ontario for their source water and encourage them to communicate their support for the Recommendations in this report, particularly Recommendation 2, to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee when a formal response on the approval of the CTC Source Water Protection Plan, and the Lake Ontario Policies contained in the Plan, has been received from the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change. |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to provide an update to City Council about the status of the Credit Valley, Toronto and Region, Central Ontario (CTC) Source Water Protection Plan, and to request Council to reiterate its endorsement of the policies in the Plan and Council's contention that the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, and not the City or other municipalities, is the appropriate body for implementing the Lake Ontario policies contained in the CTC Source Water Protection Plan.
The CTC Source Water Protection Plan was developed to address drinking water threats to water treatment plant intakes in Lake Ontario. The Plan contains policies that, once adopted, are intended to protect the near shore of Lake Ontario, which is the source of drinking water for approximately 6 million people in the Golden Horseshoe area. The policies were developed, recognizing that pollution inputs once released to Lake Ontario do not respect municipal or Source Protection Region boundaries and that it is appropriate for the Ontario Government to take responsibility for implementation.
While the CTC Source Water Protection Plan was filed for final approval with the Minister of the Environment on October 22, 2012, the CTC Source Protection Committee only recently received a written response from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change seeking removal or significant amendments to the Lake Ontario policies prior to approving the CTC Source Water Protection Plan. The CTC Source Protection Committee concluded that accepting the amendments would diminish the effectiveness of the Plan and, as a result, chose to maintain the Lake Ontario policies as originally submitted as part of the Plan at its meeting of June 24, 2014. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Source Water Protection Plan for City of Toronto Water Treatment Plants: Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72338.pdf) |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Karen Buck (PW.New.PW33.14.1)
|
| PW33.15 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy - Update |
| Items HL33.4, PW33.15 and PW33.16 will be considered together |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to:
a. develop a targeted pilot project to identify, educate, encourage, and coordinate the replacement of private and public lead service pipes on streets with a significant number of homes with lead service, and report through the 2015 budget process with the potential costs of the project;
b. remove the "cap" on the number of "Priority" lead service replacements;
c. include in all future contracts for water service replacement contracts a requirement for maintaining records of private side replacements;
d. develop a system of data collection on completion rates and outstanding lead services in the City of Toronto; and
e. examine and implement changes in the "planned" and "priority" replacements process to coordinate the work to replace public and private replacements at the same time. |
| Committee Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Commitee requested the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2015 on the feasibility of passing a by-law that would require homeowners to disclose where they have lead water service connections located on their properties and provide a clean water certificate on the transfer of their property to a new purchaser outlining the amount of lead in their water. |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water |
| Summary |
At its meeting on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014, City Council requested an update on several items relating to the City's Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy. This report responds to those requests and provides an update on several specific items related to the City's Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy - Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72320.pdf) Appendix A - Corrosion Control Implementation Plan - Backgrounder (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72321.pdf) Appendix B - Priority Lead Service Replacement Program - Work Order Process Flow (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72322.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Tony O'Donohue |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Karen Buck (PW.New.PW33.15.1)
|
| PW33.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Feasibility of Introducing a Residential Private-Side Lead Water Service Connection Replacement Funding Program |
| Items HL33.4, PW33.15 and PW33.16 will be considered together |
| Committee Recommendations |
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to develop a self-funded loan program as described in the report (July 29, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, for City of Toronto homeowners wishing to replace lead water service connections situated on their properties.
2. City Council direct that the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the second quarter of 2015 on the details of such program. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Summary |
This report is submitted in response to a direction from City Council to the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to submit a report to the August 13, 2014 meeting of Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the feasibility of developing a lead water service replacement loan program with installments paid through water bills or property taxes based on a model similar to the Home Energy Loan Program (HELP).
Previous concerns regarding providing a loan program for private property improvements have been recently lessened through changes in Provincial regulation that permit the use of local improvement charges to secure the recovery of funding provided by the City to the homeowner for work performed on private property.
Due to concerns over the health impacts of lead and calls from members of City Council and the public for City financial support to assist homeowners to finance the replacement of lead water service connections with copper piping, this report recommends that the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer submit in early 2015 the details of a program to provide secured loans to homeowners seeking to replace their lead service connections on private residential properties through a city-funded program secured as a local improvement charge on the property. |
| Background Information (Committee) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, on Feasibility of Introducing a Residential Private-Side Lead Water Service Connection Replacement Funding Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-72379.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Maggie MacDonald, Program Manager, Environmental Defence |
| Communications (Committee) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Karen Buck (PW.New.PW33.16.1)
|
| Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 35 |
| EY35.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:3 |
| Permanent Closure of the Bus Loop on Eglinton Avenue West, South of Renforth Drive |
| Bill 890 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of Eglinton Avenue West designated as Parts 1 and 2 on Plan 66R-27535 and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2014-021 (the "Highway") attached to the report (July 16, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (July 16, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, conditional upon the City entering into an agreement with Metrolinx wherein Metrolinx agrees to purchase the Highway on terms satisfactory to the City. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006. Notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notice Page of the City's website. |
| Origin |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services recommends that the bus loop on the right-of-way along the north side of Eglinton Avenue West, south of Renforth Drive, be permanently closed for incorporation into the Airport Renforth Gateway Metrolinx project. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, regarding the Permanent Closure of the Bus Loop on Eglinton Avenue West, South of Renforth Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72055.pdf) Appendix A - Draft By-law; Attachment 1 - Sketch PS-2014-021 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72056.pdf) |
| EY35.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Final Report - 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86, for the lands at 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to submit a satisfactory Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering and Construction Services. Such report shall determine the appropriateness of the water, wastewater and stormwater servicing strategy and determine if the existing municipal water and sewer systems require upgrade(s) to support the development. Should an upgrade be required to the municipal water and sewer infrastructure, the required improvements shall be secured as a matter of legal convenience in the Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
4. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the development charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
5. City Council direct that the shortfall of parkland dedication which is above the first 5% in accordance with the City wide Parkland Dedication By-law 1020-2010 be provided as a Letter of Credit which would be applied to the Above Base Park Improvements for the on-site parkland dedication.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act:
a. To secure the following facilities, services and matters from the owner at its expense:
i. A cash contribution of $250,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, to be used towards parks improvements in Ward 17 and/or towards recreational facilities in the vicinity of the property (such as an outdoor school playground structure at St. Nicholas of Bari and F.H. Miller Junior PS) at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
ii. The above amount will be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the sum by the owner to the City.
iii. In the event the cash contribution referred to above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.
b. The provision of a public park having a minimum size of 425 m2 is recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a means of legal convenience on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor.
c. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.
ii. The owner shall construct improvements and upgrades to the municipal water and sewer infrastructure at no cost to the City, should the Functional Servicing Report that has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering and Construction Services determine that the improvements and upgrades are necessary to accommodate the proposed development.
7. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to receive permits from the City’s Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division, Tree Protection & Plan Review Section, for the damage or destruction of City or Private Trees, once a satisfactory servicing strategy has been accepted.
8. City Council authorize City staff to take such actions as are necessary to give effect to these recommendations. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application at 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue proposes to redevelop the former Hughes Public School site with 14 semi-detached dwellings fronting Caledonia Road, 14 semi-detached dwellings fronting McRoberts Avenue, and 10 semi-detached and 3 row house dwellings fronting Innes Avenue, for a total of 41 dwellings. The dwellings are also proposed to include permission for a second suite in each at the time of construction.
Vehicular access to the site is proposed from a new private laneway from McRoberts Avenue and a widened existing public laneway that abuts the site to the south. Also proposed is a new public park block of approximately 425 m2 at the southeast corner of the Caledonia Road and Innes Avenue intersection.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72130.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Mark Sansom |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (July 25, 2014) Letter from Juliana Veiga (EY.New.EY35.4.1)
|
| 4a | Supplementary Report - 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This supplementary report recommends that City Council approve a further recommendation related to the conveyance of lands for a public park.
The applicant is proposing to convey 425 m2 for a public park as part of their parkland dedication requirements for the development at 177 Caledonia Rd. The proposed park contribution does not satisfy the full parkland dedication requirement, resulting in a shortfall of 124 m2 which will be paid in cash-in-lieu of parkland by the developer.
The Final Report on the application (Item EY35.4) recommends City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the development charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements.
This Supplementary Report recommends that City Council also approve the shortfall of parkland dedication that is above the first 5% be directed towards the construction of the Above Base Park Improvements of this public park. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72509.pdf) |
| EY35.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Final Report - 1193 The Queensway and 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 33, 35 and Part of 45 Zorra Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend Site and Area Specific Policy 6 (SASP 6) of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 747-2006 as amended, of the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands located at 1193 The Queensway and 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 33, 35 and part of 45 Zorra Street. This application proposes development on the south portion (Phase 3 lands) of a larger development block under the same ownership for three apartment towers with a total of 981 residential units and tower heights of 19, 27 and 42 storeys on a 2 to 4 storey podium. The application proposes a parkland dedication of 998 m2 immediately north of the Phase 3 lands to achieve a 0.67 ha public park in support of the approved development concept for the larger development block and SASP 6. This report recommends securing community benefits under Section 37 of the Planning Act in the amount of $1,250,000. In combination with the approved Phase 1 and 2 portions of the larger development block, the overall gross density of development would be 3.8 times the area of the lands.
The application proposes amendments to SASP 6 and Zoning By-law 747-2006 as amended to permit increased height and density and modified development standards on the Phase 3 lands. The amendment also proposes to modify the SASP 6 parkland dedication policy to reflect the parkland dedication requirements of the new City-wide Alternative Parkland Dedication By-law for the Phase 3 lands.
The proposed development would be compatible with the previously approved development on the Phase 1 and 2 portions of the development block and the planned context for the lands. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 1193 The Queensway and 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 33, 35 and Part of 45 Zorra Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72170.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Barry A. Horosko, Brattys, LLP (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Lee Johnston (EY.New.EY35.5.1)
(August 6, 2014) E-mail from Sarah Neville (EY.New.EY35.5.2) (August 8, 2014) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners, LLP (EY.New.EY35.5.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48870.pdf) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys, LLP (EY.New.EY35.5.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48959.pdf) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Peter Milczyn (EY.New.EY35.5.5) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-49095.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys LLP (EY.New.EY35.5.6) |
| 5a | Supplementary Report - 1193 The Queensway and 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 33, 35 and Part of 45 Zorra Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning by-law Amendment Application |
| Origin |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This supplementary report recommends that City Council approve a further recommendation related to the conveyance of lands for a public park.
The applicant is proposing to convey 998 m2 of land for a public park to be located immediately abutting the 5,666 m2 park dedicated to the City as part of the Phase 1 and 2 approvals for the larger development block. The proposed park contribution would not satisfy the full parkland dedication requirement for the development, resulting in a shortfall of 666 m2 which would be paid in cash-in-lieu of parkland by the developer.
The Final Report on the application (Item EY35.5) recommends City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the development charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements.
This Supplementary Report recommends that City Council also approve the shortfall of parkland dedication that is above the first 5% be directed towards the construction of the Above Base Park Improvements of this portion of the public park. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 31, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 1193 The Queensway and 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 29, 33, 35 and Part of 45 Zorra Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning by-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72500.pdf) |
| EY35.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Final Report - 250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Bill 993 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to fulfill the following conditions related to the Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study(s) to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District:
a) Submit any required addendums or revisions to the Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study(s) to address all potential noise sources;
b) Written confirmation has been received from the applicant's noise consulting engineering that the revised development proposal, subject to the incorporation of the required noise mitigation measures, would meet the Ministry of Environment Noise Guidelines within NPC-300; and
c) A third-party Peer Review for the City of the Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study(s) and related addendums has been completed to the satisfaction of the City. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit a four storey residential stacked townhouse development consisting of 104 units with underground parking at 250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street. A technical amendment to City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to remove these lands from this By-law is also proposed.
The proposal represents the redevelopment of a site with residential infill. The proposal is consistent with the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and conforms to the Growth Plan and the policies of the City's Official Plan. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72041.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Peter Smith, Bousfields |
| EY35.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:12 |
| Final Report - 1465 Lawrence Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Bill 1037 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No.7625, for the lands at 1465 Lawrence Avenue West substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Attachment 8 amended by deleting Section 1(g) and replacing it as follows:
1(g) A minimum of 2 sq. m of common outdoor amenity space per dwelling unit shall be provided.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the development, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount $150,000 for playground equipment at Amesbury Park.
ii. Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the development, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount $50,000 for splash pad improvements at Amesbury Park.
iii. The retention of the rental dwelling units within the existing apartment building to be secured for a minimum period of 15 years from the date the By-law comes into full force and effect.
b. The following matter is also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.
ii. The owner shall construct a new swimming pool with no capital cost passed onto tenants at 1465 Lawrence Avenue West and shall establish minimum pool access and operational parameters for the tenants of the existing apartment building at 1465 Lawrence Avenue West.
c. The above noted cash contributions are to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.
d. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Part 3a above have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to provide a Solicitor's undertaking to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor that the owner will withdraw the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of the Official Plan Amendment and Draft Plan of Condominium applications pertaining to 1465 Lawrence Avenue West (OMB Case No. PL070211), prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to submit a revised Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes the construction of a 19 storey condominium apartment building, containing 178 units at 1465 Lawrence Avenue West. A total of 203 parking spaces are proposed in two levels of underground parking. The existing 20 storey rental apartment building would be retained on the west side of the property.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. It is staff's opinion that the development represents an appropriate level of intensification for the site. The proposed building height, scale and separation distances between buildings are appropriate for the site. The proposal conforms to the Official Plan and generally conforms to the City-wide Tall Buildings Design Guidelines. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 1465 Lawrence Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72047.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Janice Robinson, Senior Associate, Goldberg Group |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) E-mail from Peter Petrelis (EY.Main.EY35.7.1)
(August 6, 2014) E-mail from Nagin Patel (EY.New.EY35.7.2) |
| EY35.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:7 |
| 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application |
| Communications EY35.8.1 and EY35.8.2 have been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Legal to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the revised applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, ensuring that the following revisions to the plans which are now filed with the City (in the four storey plus loft proposal) are properly secured in the implementing official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment:
a. The reduction in the total residential gross floor area from 7,613.7 square metres to 6,962.7 square metres.
b. The reduction in the lot coverage from 62.0% to 60.9%.
c. The reduction in the number of dwelling units from 111 units to 106 units.
d. The increase in the number of two bedroom dwelling units from 4 units to 11 units.
e. The stepback which has been introduced above the 3rd storey along the north façade, with the majority of the 4th floor setback 4.6 metres from the north lotline and the entire loft level (5th floor) setback 9.2 metres from the north lot line.
f. Within the above-noted stepback area, secure the reduced height of the 3rd floor which was reduced from 16.3 metres to 10.45 metres and the associated reduction to the height of the 4th floor from 16.3 metres to 13.6 metres.
g. Secure the introduction of the residential units along the exposed blank wall on the east façade at the P1 level.
h. Secure the residential amenity space which has been added in place of one of the residential units on the ground floor level, coupled with the increase in the amount of residential amenity space from 141.21 square metres to 168.22 square metres.
i. Secure the turn-around area which has been added at-grade for the loading space.
j. On the ground floor and second floor levels, secure the increased setback from the property line along Islington Avenue at the southwest corner which has been increased from 6.0 metres to 7.3 metres.
k. Secure the increased setback of the third floor from the rear property line, which setback has been increased from 12.8 metres to 15.8 metres.
l. On the third floor, secure the west facing balconies which have been revised to create continuous balconies parallel to Islington Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes the development of a 4-storey residential building containing 109 units at 2849-2857 Islington Avenue. The proposed building would have a floor area of approximately 6,500 m2, representing a density of 1.9 times the area of the lot.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625. It is staff's opinion the current proposal represents an over-development of the site. The proposed building height, massing and scale would not be in keeping with Official Plan policies. As well, an appropriate transition would not be provided |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Refusal Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72091.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Jessica Smuskowitz, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol Gold Lebow |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 28, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 York West (CC.New.EY35.8.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49641.pdf) (August 27, 2014) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.New.EY35.8.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49642.pdf) |
| EY35.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Request for Direction Report - 170 North Queen Street - Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval Applications |
| Communication EY35.9.1 has been sumbitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing as necessary in support of the settlement recommendations for the property at 170 North Queen Street as outlined in the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council support the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for the reasons outlined in the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to the following conditions being addressed:
a) Prior to the issuance of the Ontario Municipal Board Order, the final form of the Official Plan Amendment and the amendments to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 as described in this report and included in Attachments 6, 7a and 7b to this report be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and
b) Acceptance of a Site Servicing Review Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and, if required, the owner to enter into a financially secured Development Agreement for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure that may be identified by the Site Servicing Review Report.
3. City Council support the Site Plan Approval application for the reasons outlined in the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to the following conditions being addressed:
a) Prior to the issuance of the Ontario Municipal Board Order, the owner addresses to the satisfaction of Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, outstanding matters outlined in Part II, Section A, of Engineering and Construction Memorandum dated May 26, 2014;
b) Prior to the issuance of the Ontario Municipal Board Order, the Conditions of Site Plan Approval set out in Attachment 8 to this report be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
c) The applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, with such Agreement to include the Conditions of Site Plan Approval set out in Attachment 8 to this report.
4. City Council authorize City officials to take all necessary steps, including the execution of agreements and documents, to give effect to the above recommendations. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to amend the Official Plan, former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit the redevelopment of the property at 170 North Queen Street with commercial uses totalling 8,050 m2.
The Site Plan Approval application proposes the partial demolition and repurposing of the existing building on the site and new construction to implement the development.
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application and the related Site Plan Approval application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act. No hearing date has been set. The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction with respect to the position of the City at the OMB hearing.
This report recommends a settlement to the appeals to permit the development as proposed by the applications subject to a "H" holding provision in the Zoning By-law being placed on a portion of the lands prohibiting new construction until the earlier of: City Council adopting a recommendation on the Sherway Area Study Transportation Master Plan Study which is currently underway; or January 1, 2016.
It is staff's opinion that the settlement outlined in this report is appropriate. Staff are recommending that the settlement be supported subject to the conditions in the Recommendations Section of this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 170 North Queen Street - Official Plan, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval Applications - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72060.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| David McKay, Partner, MHBC |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 21, 2014) Letter from Ornella Richichi, Executive Vice President, Land Development, Smartcentres (CC.Supp.EY35.9.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49529.pdf) |
| EY35.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Direction Report - 300 Valermo Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications for 300 Valermo Drive in their current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding matters including: the incompatibility of the proposed development relating to proposed building heights and density; lot sizes; mutual driveway arrangements and garage locations; treatment of the existing storm sewer easement on the site; site servicing; as well as community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act.
3. In the event the applicant modifies the applications to address all or some of the issues described in Recommendation 2 (and set out in the report of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated July 22, 2014), to the satisfaction the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle all or part of the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment as applicable, and attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to take steps as required to implement the settlement.
4. In the event the applicant modifies the application to address all or some of the issues described in Recommendation 2 (and set out in the report of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated July 22, 2014), City Council direct the City Solicitor to seek instruction from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning pursuant to Chapter 415-18.1 of the Municipal Code, as amended, for the purpose of attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board with respect to related modifications to the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and appropriate conditions of subdivision approval, including conditions relating to site servicing.
5. In the event that the OMB allows the appeals, in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to:
a) request that the OMB withhold its Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment application appeal pending submission of a draft Zoning By-law Amendment satisfactory to the City Solicitor and until the applicant has entered into a Section 37 agreement with the City for the purpose of securing $1,000,000, if the proposed development is approved by the OMB in its current form, or a prorated quantum if the development is approved with reduced height and density, for improvements towards Franklin Horner Community Centre and local parks in the area as contemplated in this Report of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated July 22, 2014; and
b) request that the OMB include standard Draft Plan of Subdivision conditions in any approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision application to address technical requirement of the development including among other matters, the construction of streets and services, tree protection and planting, and grading as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to these recommendations. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
These applications propose the redevelopment of a former school site (Alderwood Collegiate Institute) located at 300 Valermo Drive with 92 freehold residential units comprised of 20 single detached and 72 semi-detached dwellings. The proposal includes a new looped public road with one vehicular access from Valermo Drive into the development.
The owner has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment and associated Draft Plan of Subdivision applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to render a decision within the time frame prescribed by the Planning Act. The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor to oppose the appeal at the OMB for the reasons outlined in this report.
The proposal is not supportable in its current form. The proposed building heights, density and lot frontages of the development do not reinforce the physical character of the stable surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed development in its current form does not address the issues raised in the Preliminary Report and raised at the pre-application meeting and during the review of the applications. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 300 Valermo Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72063.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Wayne Murray |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Michael Harrison (EY.New.EY35.10.1)
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Sandra Hendrickson (EY.New.EY35.10.2) |
| EY35.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| Request for Direction Report - 2265-2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications |
| Communications EY35.11.52 to EY35.11.56 have been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, City Planning staff and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 2265-2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street in their current form.
2. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal for the subject lands.
3. City Council direct staff to advise the Ontario Municipal Board of City Council's position that any redevelopment of the lands must also include the full replacement of the existing 19 rental dwelling units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, including the right of tenants to return to the new rental units in accordance with the Official Plan be secured, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. In the event the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold its order on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application appeals for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented a draft Zoning By-law Amendment to the Board that provides for the provision and securing of the rental housing matters as outlined in Recommendation 3 of the report (August 1, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, and a Section 37 Agreement incorporating these matters has been executed.
5. City Council further direct the City Solicitor to request an adjournment of any Ontario Municipal Board hearing in respect of this development until an appropriate planning study can be undertaken by the City in respect of Bloor Street West that will set out detailed guidelines for future development, and until that study and its conclusions are subject to public review and comment, and until that study is adopted by City Council.
6. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to include SARA/SARG, and the Resident's Associations involved in the Save Our Village campaign (Bloor West Village Residents Association, High Park Residents Association, Old Mill Community Association) as representatives of the community in any future working group(s) pertaining to the proposed development at 2265-2279 Bloor Street West. City staff shall receive and consider input from these residents associations on the future site plan control application for this development. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications propose to redevelop the lands at 2265-2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street with a 9-storey mixed use building, comprised of 83 residential dwelling units, 19 of which would be replacement residential rental units, as well as 1,200 m2 of office and retail floor area.
To accommodate this, the applicant proposes the demolition of two multi-unit rental buildings containing 17 units, and a single detached house that contains 2 rental units. The applicant has therefore submitted a Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, as the proposal involves a related group of buildings with 6 or more residential rental units.
On May 25, 2014, the Zoning By-law Amendment application was appealed by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), citing City Council’s failure to render a decision within the time period prescribed by the Planning Act. Similarly, on July 14, 2014, the applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment application to the OMB, citing lack of decision by City Council within the time period prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing date for these appeals has yet to be scheduled.
The purpose of this report is to outline issues with the proposed development from an Official Plan policy and built form perspective and seek City Council's direction for attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeals of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2265-2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72079.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Placeholder Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2265-2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72543.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Tara Christie (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Manfred Netzel (EY.New.EY35.11.1)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from H. Sokolski (EY.New.EY35.11.2) (August 7, 2014) Letter from James Isbister, Chair, Bloor West Village Residents Association (EY.New.EY35.11.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48854.pdf) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Karen and Bob Yukich (EY.New.EY35.11.4) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Kirti R. Shah (EY.New.EY35.11.5) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Steven Marcuzzi (EY.New.EY35.11.6) (August 8, 2014) Letter from Kong Eric You-Ten and Annick You-Ten (EY.New.EY35.11.7) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Ruth Malloy (EY.New.EY35.11.8) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Stephen Dorsey (EY.New.EY35.11.9) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Doug Perkins-Ball (EY.New.EY35.11.10) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Robin Pilkey (EY.New.EY35.11.11) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Michael Malloy (EY.New.EY35.11.12) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Terry Wade and Laird Rayner (EY.New.EY35.11.13) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Raj Bharati (EY.New.EY35.11.14) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Rishi Sharma (EY.New.EY35.11.15) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Jean Cormier (EY.New.EY35.11.16) (August 7, 2014) Submission from Beth and Joe Picariello (EY.New.EY35.11.17) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Yarwood (EY.New.EY35.11.18) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Veronica Wynne (EY.New.EY35.11.19) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Dunmall (EY.New.EY35.11.20) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Scott Chester (EY.New.EY35.11.21) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Linda Ruth Ciglen (EY.New.EY35.11.22) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Eliasz Zurawka (EY.New.EY35.11.23) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Karen Gautam (EY.New.EY35.11.24) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Stephanie Kalinowski (EY.New.EY35.11.25) (August 8, 2014) Letter from John Meijer, President, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (EY.New.EY35.11.26) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48911.pdf) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Julie Moss (EY.New.EY35.11.27) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Azadeh Aarabi Hashemi (EY.New.EY35.11.28) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Kimberley Wakefield (EY.New.EY35.11.29) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Scott Irvine (EY.New.EY35.11.30) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Janice Gouse-Sheese (EY.Main.EY35.11.31) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Randy Ricci (EY.New.EY35.11.32) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Trevor Jamieson (EY.New.EY35.11.33) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Craig Hartogsveld (EY.New.EY35.11.34) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Kate Lawson (EY.New.EY35.11.35) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Ruby Patrickson (EY.New.EY35.11.36) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from James P. Brown (EY.New.EY35.11.37) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Peter Landstreet (EY.New.EY35.11.38) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Judy McCormick (EY.New.EY35.11.39) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from E L Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents Association (EY.New.EY35.11.40) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mel Gardner (EY.Main.EY35.11.41) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mara Nickerson (EY.New.EY35.11.42) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Vanessa Minkowski, on behalf of the Old Mill Community Association (EY.New.EY35.11.43) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Michael and YJ Davidson (EY.New.EY35.11.44) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Elizabeth Monier-Williams (EY.New.EY35.11.45) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Sara Taylor (EY.New.EY35.11.46) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Erin Anderson (EY.New.EY35.11.47) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Chris Sheehan (EY.New.EY35.11.48) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Tara Christie (EY.New.EY35.11.49) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Nancy Leblanc (EY.New.EY35.11.50) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Marilyn Miller (EY.New.EY35.11.51) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Eva Bednar (CC.Main.EY35.11.52)
(August 22, 2014) Letter from Veronica Wynne (CC.New.EY35.11.53) (August 22, 2014) Letter from John Meijer, President, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group (CC.New.EY35.11.54) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49538.pdf) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.EY35.11.55) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49539.pdf) (August 22, 2014) Submission from Tara Christie (CC.New.EY35.11.56) |
| EY35.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Request for Direction Report - 2800 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application and Site Plan Approval Application |
| Without Recommendations Communications EY35.12.5 and EY35.12.6 have been submitted on this Item |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Zoning By-law Amendment Application based on the July 30, 2014 submission with respect to built-form, subject to further revisions to incorporate driveway access off Bloor Street West, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council approve the application to demolish the existing residential building that includes 10 residential rental housing units pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for partial replacement of the rental housing units:
a. The Owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreements to secure the conditions of rental demolition approval, including provisions requiring future owners and encumbrancers of the lands to assume the obligations contained therein, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as outlined below and as referred to in the August 1, 2014 report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
b. The Owner shall provide and maintain not less than 3 new replacement rental dwelling units, comprising 3 affordable rental dwelling units with each unit to be a unit of approximately 867 square feet, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, subject to the following:
i. The 3 replacement rental dwelling units shall be provided entirely on the subject property.
ii. The replacement rental dwelling units shall be maintained as rental units for at least 20 years, beginning with the date that each unit is occupied and until the Owner obtains approval for a zoning by-law amendment removing the requirement for replacement rental units to be maintained as rental units.
iii. The replacement rental dwelling units shall be ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which not more than 60% of the other units erected on the subject property are available and ready for occupancy.
iv. The Owner shall provide and maintain affordable rents charged to the tenants who rent the 1 designated affordable replacement rental dwelling units during the first 10 years of its occupancy, such that the initial rent shall not exceed an amount based on the most recent Fall Update Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type, and, upon turn-over, the rent charged to any new tenant shall not exceed the greater of the most recently charged rent or the most recently reported Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type and over the course of the 10 year period, annual increases shall not exceed the Provincial rent guideline and, if applicable, permitted above guideline increases.
v. Rents charged to tenants occupying an affordable replacement rental dwelling unit at the end of the 10 year period set forth in 2(b)(iv) shall be subject only to annual increases which do not exceed the Provincial rent guideline and, if applicable, permitted above guideline increases, so long as they continue to occupy their dwelling unit or until the expiry of the rental tenure period set forth in 2(b)(ii) with a phase-in period of at least three years for rent increases.
vi. After the completion of the 10 year period set forth in 2 (b)(iv), above, rents charged to tenants newly occupying a replacement rental dwelling will not be subject to any rent restrictions that may be set out in any agreement entered pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act.
3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its order on the Zoning By-law Amendment application pending:
a. Receipt of confirmation from the City Solicitor that the final form of the amendment to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code is to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
b. The submission of a Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
c. The Owner making satisfactory arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the Functional Servicing Report accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
d. The Owner providing a payment of:
i. $50,000 for local improvements; and
ii. $200,000 for the City of Toronto Affordable Housing Fund.
4. City Council request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its order on the Site Plan Control application pending the following conditions being addressed:
a. The Conditions of Site Plan Approval set out in Attachment 10 to this report being fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
b. Revisions to the proposal to incorporate driveway access off of Bloor Street West.
c. The Applicant entering into and registering a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 with such agreement to include the Conditions of Site Plan Approval set out in Attachment 10 to the report (August 1, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after all of the following events have occurred:
a. The Owner has entered into the Section 111 Agreement contemplated above.
b. The Owner has obtained the first building permit for the foundation of the development on the site.
c. The Official Plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment contemplated herein has come into full force and effect.
d. The Owner has obtained Notice of Approval conditions.
e. The Owner has provided the Section 37 Affordable Housing Funds in Recommendation 3.d above.
6. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has provided preliminary approval.
7. City Council direct the Owner to enter into and register a Section 118 Restriction on title pursuant to the Land Titles Act, with such Agreement to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council held a public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Ch. 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition applications propose to demolish the existing 3-storey residential rental building containing 10 affordable and mid-range residential rental units and replace it with a residential condominium building at 2800 Bloor Street. The Site Plan Control application proposes to implement the proposed development.
The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council's direction on a revised development proposal for the lands submitted on July 30, 2014 involving a Zoning By-law Amendment application, a Site Plan Control application and an application for permission to demolish the existing rental housing on the subject lands.
The original application submitted on June 11, 2013 proposed to demolish the existing residential rental building and replace it with a 9-storey, 8,692 m2 residential condominium building containing 44 dwelling units, of which 3 units were proposed to be non-condominium registered rental replacement dwellings.
In April 2014, the applicant submitted a revised development concept for an 8-storey, 7,708 m2 residential condominium building containing 41 dwelling units of which 3 units were proposed to be non-condominium registered rental replacement dwellings. The April 2014 resubmission was accompanied by a Site Plan Control approval application for the revised development concept.
On May 22, 2014 the applicant appealed the subject Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), citing Council's failure to make a decision within the time prescribed by the Planning Act as well as an appeal to the related Site Plan Control application. A Pre-Hearing Conference, as requested by the appellant, has yet to be scheduled by OMB.
On July 30, 2014 the applicant submitted a further revised development concept. This submission maintains the 8-storey and 41 residential unit proposal, of which 3 units are proposed to be non-condominium registered rental replacement dwellings but incorporates built form refinements and modifies indoor and outdoor on-site amenity space for the proposed development. The total gross floor area of this July 30, 2014 resubmission is 7,250 m2.
The applicant has also submitted an application for a Section 111 permit pursuant to Chapter 667 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the existing 10 residential rental units, comprising 7 two-bedroom and 3 three-bedroom units. City decisions made pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as to whether or not to allow the demolition or conversion of existing residential rental units under c.667 of the Municipal Code are not appealable to the OMB. The proposal for the rental housing replacement is to replace the existing 10 units with 3 units, comprised of 2 one-bedroom and 1 two-bedroom units at mid-range rents that are not to be condominium registered.
The July 2014 proposal provides for a building height, massing and form that Planning staff do not have any objection to from a built form perspective. However, the proposal is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2014, does not have regard to Section 2(j) of the Planning Act, and does not maintain the intent of the Official Plan policies with respect to housing. In particular, the application requires the demolition of 10 existing rental dwelling units having affordable and mid-range rents and proposes only three rental replacement dwelling units with mid-range rents. The resulting development would negatively impact the provision of an appropriate range of housing, particularly rental and affordable housing. On this basis, staff are recommending refusal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application.
This report also recommends the related Site Plan Control application not be approved until issues and concerns as detailed in this report have been addressed and in the event the OMB were to allow the zoning appeal, it is recommended that any Board Order respecting the Site Plan Control application be held to allow for resolution of the site plan issues.
This report also recommends refusal of the Rental Housing Demolition application for a permit under Municipal Code chapter 667 to demolish the 10-unit residential rental unit apartment building at 2800 Bloor Street West due to the proposed loss of rental and affordable housing. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2800 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application and Site Plan Approval Application
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72075.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Placeholder Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2800 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application and Site Plan Approval Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72544.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Sylvia Serley |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Shahrzad Davoudi-Strike (EY.New.EY35.12.1)
(August 7, 2014) Letter from Residents of Kingscourt Drive, containing approximately 13 signatures (EY.New.EY35.12.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-49027.pdf) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kayla MacNeil-DeSousa (EY.New.EY35.12.3) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Victoria Sharpe (EY.New.EY35.12.4) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 18, 2014) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-chairs, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee (CC.Main.EY35.12.5)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49513.pdf) (August 27, 2014) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (CC.New.EY35.12.6) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49625.pdf) |
| EY35.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Final Report - 150 Symes Road - Site Plan Approval Application |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council defer consideration of the Site Plan Control application for the proposed re-use of the existing heritage building and existing service garage, plus the addition of four new buildings on the west and north portions of the site for a range of non–residential uses at 150 Symes Road as the associated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments are not in full force and effect and outstanding matters have not been finalized with all commenting agencies and City Divisions.
2. City Council refer the Site Plan Control application back to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate and delegate back the authority to issue Notice of Approval Conditions and final Site Plan Approval once the outstanding matters have been finalized with all agencies and City Divisions and the uses are permitted by the zoning by- law.
3. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to consider the following provisions in his consideration of outstanding matters related to 150 Symes Road:
a. A new municipal sidewalk and associated retaining wall along the south boulevard of Symes Road shall be required and constructed as part of Phase 2 of the development, as indicated on Site Plan Drawing A1, dated June 5, 2014.
b. The construction of the public sidewalk and private walkways east and northeast portions of the site shall be in accordance with Landscape Plan L1A, dated July 7, 2014, being the latest plan reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services.
c. The pedestrian crossing improvements at the municipal boulevard adjacent to the north-east corner of the site, including tactile walking surface and depressed curbs, shall be implemented as per the applicable City standards at such time as municipal sidewalks are implemented along the south municipal boulevard of Glen Scarlett Road and on the east municipal boulevard of Symes Road. Until such time, improvements to the municipal boulevard in this location shall be in accordance with Landscape Drawing L1A, dated July 7, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to implement a proposed development that would be permitted by an associated application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws (City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83) to permit the re-use of the existing heritage building and existing service garage, plus the addition of four new buildings on the west and north portions of the site for a range of non–residential uses at 150 Symes Road. The proposed range of uses, some of which are potentially sensitive uses, includes office, light industrial, brewery, commercial school, clinic, indoor recreation uses such as a rock-climbing, fitness and dance, as well as multi-purpose rooms for art gallery and private event uses, including food service (indoors and outdoors).
It is staff's opinion that approval of the Site Plan Control Application at this time would be premature for the reasons outlined in this report.
This report reviews and recommends deferral of a decision on the Site Plan Control application until the associated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments are in full force and effect and outstanding matters are finalized with all commenting agencies and City Divisions. It is further recommended that the authority to issue Notice of Approval Conditions and final Site Plan Approval be delegated back to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning Etobicoke York District regarding 150 Symes Road - Site Plan Approval Application
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72086.pdf) (July 18, 2014) Placeholder Report from the Director, Community Planning Etobicoke York District regarding 150 Symes Road - Site Plan Approval Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72545.pdf) |
| EY35.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:4 |
| Phase 1 Status Report - City Initiated Humbertown Secondary Plan Study |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council determine that a second phase of work is required to meet its October 2013 direction to undertake a comprehensive review of the potential Humbertown Secondary Plan Area and Planning staff be directed to:
a. Prepare and issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to select an external consulting team to undertake the second phase of the review and to prepare a Site and Area Specific Policy for the Apartment Neighbourhoods designated lands within the Study Area.
b. Lead the Humbertown land use review, in consultation with the external consultant, and to establish the respective roles and responsibilities for the land use review including the scope of the review, financing, administration, deliverables and timing.
c. Include a public consultation program comprised of both broad community-wide forums and smaller working groups, to include area residents and businesses, local community associations, property owners within the potential Humbertown land use review area, the Ward Councillor(s), representatives of City Divisions and external agencies, as appropriate.
d. Include the cost of the second phase of work in City Planning's 2015 budget.
e. Report back to Etobicoke York Community Council on the results of the second phase of work by the third quarter of 2015. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
This report presents the findings of the first phase of the Humbertown Secondary Plan Study (Study). Phase 1 of the Study included the review of the existing and planned context for the Study Area as well as the identification and evaluation of opportunities and constraints relative to existing Official Plan policy, in order to develop specific recommendations regarding the future direction and scope of work for Phase 2 of the Study.
The final report prepared by IBI Group, the planning consultant hired to conduct Phase 1 of the Study, summarizes the process undertaken by the consultant and the findings of the background review. The report concludes that a Secondary Plan should not be pursued for the Study Area and the appropriate method to enhance the existing policy framework is to advance to a second phase of the Study for the purpose of creating a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP). The primary reason for this recommended approach is to provide greater clarity on how the Official Plan is to be interpreted for the Apartment Neighbourhoods designated lands within the Study Area.
Planning staff have provided two recommendations for the consideration of City Council and are recommending that City Council adopt Recommendation A of this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding the City Initiated Humbertown Secondary Plan Study -
Phase 1 Status Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72132.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Jeremy Skinner (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from Ian O. Ihnatowycz, President, Humber Valley Village Residents' Association (EY.New.EY35.14.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48899.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Jeremy Skinner (EY.Main.EY35.14.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-49293.pdf) |
| EY35.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:1 |
| Amendment to the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 51 Panorama Court |
| Communication EY35.16.2 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1 City Council amend the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties for 51 Panorama Court in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 51 Panorama Court, Revised Reasons for Listing, June, 2014, attached as Attachment 4 to the report (June 23, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division. |
| Origin |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council amend the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties for the property at 51 Panorama Court to include its heritage landscape attributes. The site is located on the south side of Panorama Court north-east of the Kipling and Finch Avenue intersection in Thistletown and contains the former Sick Children's Hospital (County Branch) Thistletown, now the Thistletown Regional Centre for Children and Adolescents, which officially opened in October 1928. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding an Amendment to the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 51 Panorama Court
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71269.pdf) Attachment No.1 - Location Map, 51 Panorama Court (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71270.pdf) Attachment No. 2 - Photographs, 51 Panorama Court (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71271.pdf) Attachment No. 3 - Original Reasons for Listing, 51 Panorama Court (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71272.pdf) Attachment No. 4 - Revised Reasons for Listing, 51 Panorama Court (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71273.pdf) Attachment No. 5 - Revised Research and Evaluation Summary, 51 Panorama Court (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71274.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from Kayann D'Souza, Project Manager, Sales, Easements and Acquisitions, Infrastructure Ontario (EY.New.EY35.16.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48913.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Anil Wijesooriya, Vice President, Sales, Easements and Acquisitions, Infrastructure Ontario (CC.New.EY35.16.2)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49565.pdf) |
| 16a | Toronto Preservation Board Recommendation - Amendment to the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 51 Panorama Court |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 23, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Amendment to the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties – 51 Panorama Court. The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council, adoption of the recommendation contained in the report, without amendment. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding Amendment to the Reasons for Listing on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 51 Panorama Court
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72205.pdf) |
| EY35.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the properties at 30 Powerhouse Street (Building No. 15, Office Building) and 31 Powerhouse Street (Building No 10, Powerhouse), in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the rehabilitation of each property in accordance with the Conservation Plans prepared by Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd. both dated June 23, 2014, on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to Registration of Plan of Condominium for Phase 5, the owner shall:
i. Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements with the City for the properties at 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street substantially in accordance with and subject to the Conservation Plans prepared by Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd. both dated June 23, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreements to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
b. Prior to the issuance of Heritage Permits, the owner shall:
i. Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications keyed to the approved Conservation Plans, including a description of materials and finishes, to the prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure all work included in the Conservation Plans.
iii. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the properties to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
c. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:
i. Provide letters of substantial completion prepared and signed by the heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plans and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council grant authority for the execution of Heritage Easement Agreements under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the properties at 30 Powerhouse Street and 31 Powerhouse Street.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreements.
4. City Council request Heritage Preservation Services staff to continue to work with the Applicant on the design of replacement windows for the Powerhouse building. |
| Origin |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the Conservation Plans generally described in this report for the heritage properties at 30 Powerhouse Street (Building No. 15, Office Building) and 31 Powerhouse Street (Building No 10, Powerhouse) in conjunction with a Site Plan Approval application for Phase 5 of the seven-phase development of “Davenport Village” provided the two heritage buildings are retained, conserved and subject to Heritage Easement Agreements. Should City Council endorse these Conservation Plans, staff recommend that Council require the owner to enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement on each property and authorize staff to take the necessary steps to enter in such Heritage Easement Agreements, to ensure the long-term protection of the buildings. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71282.pdf) Attachment No. 1 - Location Map, 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71283.pdf) Attachment No. 2 - Site Plan, 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71284.pdf) Attachment No. 3 - Photographs, 30 Powerhouse Street (Office Building) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71285.pdf) Attachment No. 4 - Photographs, 31 Powerhouse Street (Powerhouse) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71286.pdf) Attachment No. 5 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, East Elevation, 30 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71287.pdf) Attachment No. 6 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, West Elevation, 30 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71288.pdf) Attachment No. 7 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, North Elevation, 30 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71309.pdf) Attachment No. 8 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, South Elevation, 30 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71310.pdf) Attachment No. 9 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, East Elevation, 31 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71311.pdf) Attachment No. 10 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, West Elevation, 31 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71312.pdf) Attachment No. 11 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, North Elevation, 31 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71313.pdf) Attachment No. 12 - Drawings, Existing and Proposed, South Elevation, 31 Powerhouse (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71314.pdf) |
| 17a | Toronto Preservation Board Recommendations - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 23 , 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements – 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street. The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council, adoption of the recommendations contained in the report, without amendment. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 30 and 31 Powerhouse Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72250.pdf) |
| EY35.18 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 150 Symes Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the property at 150 Symes Road, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the rehabilitation of the property in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Jedd Jones Architect Ltd. dated June 5, 2014 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by Philip Goldsmith Architect dated May 23, 2013, both on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the owner shall have:
i. Entered into and registered a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 150 Symes Road substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Philip Goldsmith Architect dated May 23, 2013 and subject to and in accordance with the herein required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
ii. Provided a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 150 Symes Road prepared by Philip Goldsmith Architect dated May 23, 2013 to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. Completed all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iv. Provided Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
v. The related Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Prior to the issuance of a Heritage Permit, the owner shall have:
i. Provided full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provided a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan.
c. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall have:
i. Provided a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by the heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provided replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 150 Symes Road.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement. |
| Origin |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the designated property at 150 Symes Road (Symes Road Incinerator) in conjunction with an application to amend the Official Plan and the existing Zoning By-law in order to facilitate the redevelopment of the site and rehabilitate the historic incinerator, provided the Symes Road Incinerator is retained, conserved and subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement. Should City Council endorse this strategy, staff recommend that Council require the owner to enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City and authorize staff to take the necessary steps to enter into such Heritage Easement Agreement, to ensure the long-term protection of 150 Symes Road. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 150 Symes Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71238.pdf) Attachment No. 1 - Location Map, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71258.pdf) Attachment No. 2 - Site Plan, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71259.pdf) Attachment No. 3 - Archival Photographs, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71260.pdf) Attachment No. 4 - Photographs, East and West Elevations, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71261.pdf) Attachment No. 5 - Photographs, East and West Elevations, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71262.pdf) Attachment No. 6 - Proposal: East and West Elevations, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71263.pdf) Attachment No. 7 - Proposal: North and South Elevations, 150 Symes Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71264.pdf) |
| 18a | Toronto Preservation Board Recommendations - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 150 Symes Road |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 19 , 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement – 150 Symes Road. The Toronto Preservation Board recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council adoption of the recommendations contained in the report, without amendment. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 150 Symes Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72252.pdf) |
| EY35.27 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Application to Injure a Private Tree - 84 Ballacaine Drive |
| Communication EY35.27.1 has been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant the request for a permit to injure one (1) privately owned tree located in the rear yard of 84 Ballacaine Drive, with the following conditions:
a. The applicant be required to comply with the recommendations relating to “Minimizing Construction Stress” for Tree “9”, found in paragraphs 39-41 of the Arborists’ Report prepared by Bruce Tree Expert Company Ltd., dated June 7, 2014.
b. The applicant be required to post security in the form of a certified cheque for $583, to be held for a period of 1 year from the date of the injury by Parks, Forestry and Recreation. At the end of one year the certified cheque shall be returned to the applicant if in the opinion of Parks, Forestry and Recreation the tree is considered to be “healthy”, otherwise it shall be treated as a cash-in-lieu payment to fund the planting of a new tree off-site. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to injure one (1) privately owned tree located in the rear yard of 84 Ballacaine Drive. The owner of 32 Bethnal Avenue is requesting tree injury due to proposed construction of a new dwelling at 32 Bethnal Avenue.
The subject tree is a white pine (Pinus strobus) measuring 63 cm in diameter. The tree has been well maintained and is currently in good condition, structurally and botanically. Urban Forestry does not support injury of this tree. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, regarding an Application to Injure a Tree at 84 Ballacaine Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71751.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Michael Foderick |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (July 7, 2014) Letter from Allan Laurent and Gail MacRae (EY.New.EY35.27.1)
|
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 25, 2014) Letter from Alan Fazeli and Charlene Schafer submitted by Councillor James Maloney, Ward 5, Etobicoke-Lakeshore (CC.New.EY35.27.2)
|
| EY35.28 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Application to Remove a Private Tree - 57 Boon Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant the request for a permit to remove the privately owned silver maple tree at 57 Boon Avenue, with a condition that the owner provide satisfactory replacement planting, providing cash-in-lieu for the planting of one tree, and the applicant to provide three (3) trees as replacement to be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located in the rear yard of 57 Boon Avenue. The applicant is requesting tree removal due to the tree being too close to the neighbour's garage and creating parking issues.
The subject tree is a silver maple (Acer saccharinum) measuring 46 cm in diameter. The tree is healthy and in good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, regarding and Application to Remove a Private Tree at 57 Boon Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71683.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Marc Tencate |
| EY35.39 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Exclusive Right Turn Lane - Islington Avenue at The Queensway |
| Bill 939 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the enactment of a one-way traffic lane anytime regulation for the westerly southbound lane on Islington Avenue, between The Queensway and a point 30.5 metres north, in the southbound right-turning direction, buses exempted. |
| Origin |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of a one-way traffic lane anytime regulation for the westerly southbound lane on Islington Avenue, between The Queensway and a point 30.5 metres north, in the southbound right-turning direction, buses exempted.
It is appropriate to install an exclusive westbound right turn lane based on the existing lane configuration and our observations.
Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Islington Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 7, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regarding an Exclusive Right Turn Lane - Islington Avenue at The Queensway
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71958.pdf) Attachment 1 - Location Map (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71959.pdf) |
| EY35.41 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:3 |
| Exclusive Left Turn Lane - The West Mall and Wellesworth Drive |
| Bill 938 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the enactment of a one-way traffic lane anytime regulation for the westerly northbound lane on The West Mall, between Wellesworth Drive and a point 30.5 metres south, in the northbound left-turning direction. |
| Origin |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to propose the installation of a one-way traffic lane anytime regulation for the westerly northbound lane on The West Mall, between Wellesworth Drive and a point 30.5 metres south, in the northbound left-turning direction.
It is appropriate to install an exclusive northbound left turn lane based on the existing lane configuration, observations and traffic counts.
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on The West Mall and Wellesworth Drive, City Council approval of this report is required. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, regarding an Exclusive Left Turn Lane - The West Mall and Wellesworth Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71832.pdf) Attachment 1 - Location Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71833.pdf) |
| EY35.61 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Parking Regulation Amendment - Marine Parade Drive |
| Bill 937 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the east/north/west sides of Marine Parade Drive between the west intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and the east intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West.
2. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Stopping Anytime” regulation on the north and west sides of Marine Parade Drive between a point 75.0 metres south of Lake Shore Boulevard West (east intersection) and a point 333.0 metres further south and west.
3. City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking Anytime” regulation on the north and east sides of Marine Parade Drive between a point 408.0 metres south and west of the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West (east intersection) and Lake Shore Boulevard West (west intersection). |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to change existing "No Parking Anytime" regulations to "No Stopping Anytime" regulations on Marine Parade Drive.
Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Marine Parade Drive, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the matter and has not objected to the proposal. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regarding Parking Regulations on Marine Parade Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71784.pdf) Attachments 1 - Map of Existing Parking Conditions; Attachment 2 - Map of Proposed Amendments (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-71785.pdf) |
| EY35.70 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1830 Bloor Street West |
| Bill 897 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes:
- 1830 Bloor Street West.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, regarding the Designation of Fire Routes at 1830 Bloor Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72042.pdf) Draft By-law to amend Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to include 1830 Bloor Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72329.pdf) |
| EY35.72 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Ward 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore Streetscape BIA Manual |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve, in principle, the Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore Streetscape BIA Manual as a guideline for improvements to lands within the four Ward 6 BIAs, and that the Manual be forwarded to the General Manager of Economic Development for review, in consultation with the Chief Planner, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and any other relevant Divisions, and report back to the first meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council in 2015, on any recommended adjustments. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore |
| Summary |
The four Business Improvement Areas in Ward 6 have undertaken a comprehensive revitalization initiative and as part of this process have adopted a landowner's streetscape manual. When implemented, the manual's guidelines will establish an easily identifiable BIA district which will create a destination welcoming new businesses and customers to the area. This manual will inform the site plans as they relate to the public right-of-way and ensure that the BIA's vision is captured and implemented through this process. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, regarding the Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore Streetscape BIA Manual
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72153.pdf) Part 1 - Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore BIA Streetscape Manual (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72137.pdf) Part 2 - Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore BIA Streetscape Manual (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72173.pdf) Part 3 - Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore BIA Streetscape Manual (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72174.pdf) Part 4 - Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore BIA Streetscape Manual (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72178.pdf) Part 5 - Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore BIA Streetscape Manual (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-72179.pdf) |
| EY35.73 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:2, 6, 7, 13 |
| Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes |
| Communications EY35.73.5 and EY35.73.6 have been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
A. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests, noting that the applicant is required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:
1. A temporary liquor license extension for Woodbine Entertainment Group, 555 Rexdale Boulevard, for Woodbine Mile Race Day on September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
2. The Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (Toronto) Inc. request to operate a beer garden adjacent to its headquarters at 2445 Bloor Street West, as part of the Bloor West Village Toronto Ukrainian Festival, on:
- Friday, September 12, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. - Saturday, September 13, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. - Sunday, September 14, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Etobicoke York Community Council, under its delegated authority, declared for liquor licensing purposes, the following event to be of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to it taking place:
1. The Limers Group annual fundraising event to be held at the Taras Shevchenko Ukrainian Community Centre, 482 Horner Avenue, on November 22, 2014, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
Etobicoke York Community Council also directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised of its objection to the request for a special occasion permit for the Toronto African Film and Music Festival, August 29-31, 2014, at the Toronto Plaza Hotel, 1677 Wilson Avenue; and further, that the Commission be advised of the Community Council's request that any future permit requests that involve the use of the outdoor parking lot at this location, be refused. |
| Summary |
Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes. |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Letter from Steven McKinnon, CEO, Kinron Associates, and Paris Rogers, Executive Director, Toronto African Film & Music Festival, regarding the Festival taking place from August 29-31, 2014 at the Toronto Plaza Hotel (EY.Main.EY35.73.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48685.pdf) (July 14, 2014) Letter from Roxanne Richardson, regarding an annual fundraising event at the Taras Shevchenko Ukrainian Community Centre on November 22, 2014 (EY.Main.EY35.73.2) (July 24, 2014) Letter from William F. Orct, Director, Racing and Gaming Hospitality, Woodbine Entertainment Group, regarding the Woodbine Mile Race Day on September 14, 2014 (EY.Main.EY73.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48761.pdf) (August 4, 2014) Submission from the President, Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (Toronto) regarding a Beer Garden during the Bloor West Village Ukrainian Festival, September 12-14, 2014 (EY.New.EY35.73.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48844.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 13, 2014) E-mail from Roger Bu, Owner, Axis Gallery & Grill, requesting approval of a patio extension for the Axis Gallery & Grill, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. on September 20, 2014, during the Junction Music Festival. (CC.Main.EY35.73.5)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49493.pdf) (August 19, 2014) E-mail from Indira Nanavati, Owner, La Revolucion, requesting approval of a patio extension for the La Revolucion, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. on September 20, 2014, during the Junction Music Festival. (CC.Main.EY35.73.6) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49542.pdf) |
| North York Community Council - Meeting 34 |
| NY34.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Permanent Closure of Part of the Public Highway Known as Zachary Court |
| Bill 913 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of the public highway known as Zachary Court designated as Part 1 on 66R-27012, Sketch No. PS-2014-064 attached as Attachment 2 to the report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services recommends that a portion of the public highway know as Zachary Court be permanently closed. Zachary Court will be replaced with a new public highway as part of Phase I of the Lawrence Heights Revitalization Project. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Permanent Closure of Part of the Public Highway Known as Zachary Court
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71869.pdf) Attachment 1 - Draft By-law (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71870.pdf) Attachment 2 - Sketch No. PS-20014-064 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71871.pdf) |
| Declared Interests (Community Council) |
| The following member(s) declared an interest: |
| NY34.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Proposed Closure to Vehicular Traffic, Portions of the Public Lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure to vehicular traffic, portions of the public lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street, designated as Part 8 on Reference Plan 64R-14258 and Part 1 on Reference Plan 66R-27540, and shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Sketch No. PS-20014-077 (the "Lanes") attached as Attachment 2 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services recommends that portions of the public lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street be close by by-law to restrict access to vehicular traffic. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Proposed Closure to Vehicular Traffic, Portions of the Public Lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71964.pdf) Attachment 1 - Sketch No. PS-2014-077 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71965.pdf) Attachment 2 - Draft By-law (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71966.pdf) |
| NY34.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| Permanent Closure of two Public Lanes in the Block Bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the two public lanes in the block bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue, shown as Parts 1 and 2 on Sketch No. PS-2012-079 (the "Lanes") attached as Attachment 2 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, conditional upon the City entering into an agreement with Leaside Shopping Centres Limited, (the "Purchaser"), wherein the Applicant agrees to purchase the Lanes from the City on terms satisfactory to the City. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services recommends that the two public lanes in the block bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue be permanently closed. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Permanent Closure of two Public Lanes in the Block Bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71973.pdf) Attachment 1 - Draft By-law (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71974.pdf) Attachment 2 - Sketch No. PS-2012-079 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71975.pdf) |
| NY34.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Application to Remove a Private Tree - 251 McKee Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree at the rear of 251 McKee Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at the rear of 251 McKee Avenue. The owner is requesting removal of this tree due to the required maintenance, the emission of juglone (a substance produced by walnut trees that can be toxic to some plants), and the damage the tree could cause if it failed and fell onto nearby dwellings and properties.
The subject tree is a black walnut (Juglans nigra) measuring 59 cm in diameter that tree is in good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on an Application to Remove a Private Tree at 251 McKee Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71680.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Maurus Cappa (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Submission from Maurus Cappa (NY.New.NY34.19.1)
|
| NY34.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alteration of the heritage property at 2384 Yonge Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 27-storey residential tower and the adaptive re-use of the former Postal Station K building for commercial/retail use, provided that 2384 Yonge Street is designated and subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City, with such alterations to the property to be substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014 and the drawings prepared by RAW Design, dated May 21, 2014 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:
a. that the related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
b. that prior to the introduction of bills for the Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall have:
i. entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 2384 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor; and
ii. completed and entered into a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
c. that prior to Site Plan Approval for the property at 2384 Yonge Street the owner shall have:
i. provided a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 2384 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects, dated June 2, 2014 and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. provided Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
d. that prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 2384 Yonge Street, excluding the portion of the lot known municipally in the year 2014, as 31 Montgomery Avenue, including pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act and the Building Code Act and including any permit for excavation and shoring or foundation, but excluding a permit for the removal of the one storey addition to the rear of the heritage structure, a rental/sales centre, repairs, maintenance and usual and minor repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:
i. obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the property at 2384 Yonge Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
ii. have obtained Final Site Plan Approval for such property issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for an above-grade permit only;
iii. provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, except in the case of any below grade permit, only the subject building permit drawings are to be provided;
iv. provide a Lighting Plan that describes how Postal Station K will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above grade permit only;
v. provide an Interpretation Plan for Postal Station K, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above grade permit only; and
vi. provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and the Interpretation Plan; and
e. that prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:
i. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. |
| Origin |
| (June 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the former Postal Station K building at 2384 Yonge Street (entrance address for 2388 Yonge Street) which is located north of Helendale Avenue. Postal Station K was listed on the City of Toronto's Inventory of Heritage Properties on February 6, 1974 and will be subject to a Notice of Intention to Designate under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act should City Council approve recommendations contained in an August 21, 2013 report from the Acting Director, Urban Design which will be considered at the July 8-9, 2014 Council meeting.
The property is the subject of an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment that proposes the full retention of the two-storey Postal Station K building and the construction of a 27-storey tower. The long term protection of Postal Station K will be secured through the registration of a heritage easement agreement on the title of the property. |
| 20a | Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K) |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K). |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72038.pdf) |
| NY34.22 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:8 |
| Lane Designation - Finch Avenue West Between Dufferin Street and Alness Street |
| Bill 940 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the designation of a two-way centre left turn lane on Finch Avenue West from a point 130 metres west of Dufferin Street to a point 110 metres further west. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Finch Avenue West City Council approval of this report is required.
To approve the installation of a "Two-way centre left turn lane" on Finch Avenue West from a point 130 metres west of Dufferin Street to 110 metres further west.
The designation of the two-way centre left turn lane and subsequent implementation of the required pavement markings on Finch Avenue West between Dufferin Street and Alness Street will provide a positive guidance to motorists on this section of roadway when accessing the multiple driveway accesses. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Reoprt from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on a Lane Designation on Finch Avenue West between Dufferin Street and Alness Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71686.pdf) Attachment 1- Map - Finch Avenue - Lane Designation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71687.pdf) |
| NY34.24 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:9 |
| All Way Stop Controls - Ancaster Community |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Katherine Road.
2. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Plewes Road.
3. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Ancaster Road and Home Road.
4. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Murray Road and Katherine Road.
5. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Murray Road and Plewes Road.
6. City Council approve the installation of a Pedestrian Crossover at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Katherine Road, to address the concerns of the residents with regards to the uncontrolled pedestrian (school age children) crossing activity at this intersection during the arrival and dismissal times for Ancaster Public School and St. Norbert Catholic School located in the immediate area. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Garratt Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.
To deny the request for the installation of All Way Stop Controls at the following intersections:
- Garratt Boulevard at Katherine Road; - Garratt Boulevard at Plewes Road; - Ancaster Road at Home Road; - Murray Road at Katherine Road; and - Murray Road at Plewes Road
Staffs review of the above noted intersections has concluded that the existing traffic controls at each intersection is adequately controlling the movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on All Way Stop Controls in the Ancaster Community
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71953.pdf) Attachment 1 - Map - All Way Stop Controls - Ancaster Community (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71954.pdf) |
| NY34.25 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:10 |
| Through Traffic Restriction - Kennard Avenue and William R. Allen Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the installation of a westbound through prohibition, cyclists excepted, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Kennard Avenue and W.R. Allen Road.
2. City Council approve the construction of the road widening conditional upon funding, design and construction from Rimrock Plaza Inc. (Herefordshire Capital Corporation).
3. City Council direct Transportation Services to request the City's Legal Division to introduce the appropriate Road Alterations By-law to permit the construction of a road widening on Kennard Avenue, west of Dufferin Street/W.R. Allen Road to facilitate a four lane cross section, three outbound lanes (left, through and right turn lanes) and one inbound lane. |
| Origin |
| (May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit services on Kennard Avenue and William R. (W.R.) Allen Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to prohibit westbound through movements from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of Kennard Avenue and W.R. Allen Road.
The installation of the westbound through prohibitions at this intersection will address the concerns of road users with respect to the increasing delay to the westbound right turning movement due to the low volume of through traffic holding up the westbound right turns, specifically during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, regarding Through Traffic Restriction at Kennard Avenue and William R. Allen Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70955.pdf) Attachment 1 - Map - Through Traffic Restriction - Kennard Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70956.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (June 17, 2014) E-mail from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird & Berlis LLP, submitted by Ashley Bridgeman, Aird & Berlis LLP (NY.Main.NY34.26.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48381.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pasternak (NY.New.NY34.25.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49079.pdf) |
| NY34.32 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Turn Prohibition - Marlee Avenue at Glencairn Avenue |
| Bill 941 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the deletion of the northbound left turn, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday prohibition at Glencairn Avenue and Marlee Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Marlee Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to remove the northbound left turn prohibition, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Marlee Avenue and Glencairn Avenue.
The deletion of the northbound left turn prohibition will provide the community to the west of Marlee Avenue an alternate access route to their homes without unduly impacting the operations of the intersection. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Turn Prohibition at Marlee Avenue at Glencairn Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71905.pdf) Attachment 1 - Map - Marlee Avenue at Glencairn Avenue Northbound Left Turn (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71906.pdf) |
| NY34.38 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Installation of Pay and Display Parking Machines - Avenue Road, south of Burnaby Boulevard |
| Bills 942 and 943 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the removal of No Parking from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east of Avenue Road between Burnaby Boulevard and College View Avenue.
2. City Council approve the installation of No Parking from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east of Avenue Road between a point 30.5 metres south of Burnaby Boulevard and College View Avenue.
3. City Council approve the removal of permitted parking for 1 hour from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Avenue Road from Burnaby Boulevard to point 30.5 metres south.
4. City Council approve the installation of pay and display machines on the east side of Avenue Road from Burnaby Boulevard to a point 30.5 metres further south to operate between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday; for a fee of $2.25 per hour, for a maximum of 3 hours. |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to install a Pay and Display Machines on the east side of Avenue Road, south of Burnaby Boulevard.
A review by Transportation Services and Toronto Parking Authority staff concluded that the west side of Avenue Road, immediately south of Burnaby Boulevard, can accommodate three pay and display parking spaces. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, on Installation of Pay and Display Parking Machines on Avenue Road, south of Burnaby Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71754.pdf) Attachment 1 - Map - Avenue Road - Pay and Display Parking (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71755.pdf) |
| NY34.54 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:34 |
| All Way Stop Control - Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road |
| Bill 944 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road. |
| Origin |
| (July 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to install an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road.
The installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road will address the existing right-of-way concerns for motorists and pedestrians at the intersection. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, on an
All Way Stop Control at Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71749.pdf) Attachment 1 - Map - AWSC - Teak Ave and Carnforth Rd (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71750.pdf) |
| NY34.56 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:8, 34 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1800 O'Connor Drive and 75-89 Gosford Boulevard |
| Bill 903 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:
a. 1800 O'Connor Drive; and
b. 75-89 Gosford Boulevard.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1800 O'Connor Drive and 75-89 Gosford Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71623.pdf) Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71624.pdf) |
| NY34.57 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:9 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 2699-2791 Jane Street to 2699-2721 Jane Street |
| Bill 1060 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 2699-2791 Jane Street to 2699-2721 Jane Street.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to amend the designation a certain portion of the property municipally known as 2699-2721 Jane Street as a fire route within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. The fire route in question has a typo in the address listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes Chapter 880, and requires correcting. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 2699-2791 Jane Street to 2699-2721 Jane Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72024.pdf) Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72025.pdf) |
| NY34.58 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - to amend the address of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 1 Anndale Drive to 17 Anndale Drive |
| Bill 1061 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to amend the address of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 1 Anndale Drive to 17 Anndale Drive.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to amend the designation a certain portion of the property municipally known as 17 Anndale Drive as a fire route within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. The fire route in question was applied for by the owner with the incorrect municipal address 1 Anndale Drive. As a result the address listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes Chapter 880 requires correcting.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To amend the address of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 1 Anndale Drive to 17 Anndale Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72018.pdf) Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72019.pdf) |
| NY34.59 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To repeal the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B) |
| Bill 1062 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Coucil recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to repeal the designation of the private road located at the property formerly municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue East, and delete 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B) from Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to repeal the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B) as fire routes within the meaning of Chapter 880, Fire Routes. The municipal address for the entire property was changed to 1090 Don Mills Road in 2008 in conjunction with redevelopment of the property. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To repeal the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71984.pdf) Attachment - Address change letter (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71985.pdf) |
| NY34.60 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Assumption of Services - Plans 66M-2456, 66M-2492, and 66M-2494 - Avonshire Project - Oakburn Crescent/Harrison Garden Boulevard |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Coumcil recommends that:
1. City Council assume the services installed within Oakburn Crescent and Harrison Garden Boulevard and that the City formally assume these roads which are shown on Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494.
2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreements.
3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services within the Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting systems constructed within Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494 to Toronto Hydro.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Engineering Review |
| Summary |
This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services within Oakburn Crescent and Harrison Garden Boulevard, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreements for Plan 66M-2456, dated May 26, 2008; Plan 66M-2492, dated November 22, 2011; and Plan 66M-2494, dated December 13, 2011 between K&G Oakburn Apartments Ltd. and the City of Toronto. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Engineering Review, on the Assumption of Services for Plans 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494 - Avonshire Project at Oakburn Crescent/Harrison Garden Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72258.pdf) |
| NY34.62 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 28 Hedgewood Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the consent and minor variance applications related to 28 Hedgewood Road (B059/13NY, A741/13NY and A742/13NY) and, if necessary, to retain outside planners and experts.
|
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Memo from Councillor Robinson |
| Summary |
Consent and minor variance applications related to 28 Hedgewood Road were refused by the Committee of Adjustment on March 19, 2014. The applications entailed the demolition of an existing house and the construction of two new two-storey houses.
The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment's decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board, and a hearing has been scheduled for October 1, 2014.
If approved, the resulting lots and houses would be inconsistent with the surrounding streetscape, which is characterized by large lots with significant canopy coverage and green space. Ultimately, the proposed homes do not fit the unique look and feel of the neighbourhood. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Memo from Councillor Robinson regarding a Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 28 Hedgewood Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72118.pdf) Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decisions - Minor Variance and Consent Applications - 28 Hedgewood Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72119.pdf) |
| NY34.70 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Status Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 500 Sheppard Avenue East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and any other issues that may be identified through the continuing review of the application, and to report back to North York Community Council prior to the start of the full Ontario Municipal Board hearing. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The application proposes a 29-storey mixed-use building, 91 metres high with 310 dwelling units (including 5 live-work units) and 2,998 square metres of commercial floor space at 500 Sheppard Avenue East. The gross floor area proposed is 27,295 square metres resulting in a proposed density of 4.76 times the area of the lot. The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period under the Planning Act. A prehearing was held on July 15, 2014. A full hearing is scheduled for March 2 to 15, 2015.
This report provides the status of the application including the issues identified to date by City staff and agencies through the review of the application. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Status Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 500 Sheppard Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72116.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Marc P. Kemerer, Blaney McMurtry, Barristers & Solicitors, representing Mallpaks Developments Limited (NY.New.NY34.70.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49135.pdf) |
| NY34.72 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Status Report - Bayview Townhouse Design Guidelines |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Planning staff to hold a community consultation meeting to present the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines to the community and seek their input on the draft guidelines attached.
2. City Council direct that, following the community consultation meeting, City Planning staff continue to refine the draft guidelines and report to North York Community Council in the first quarter of 2015 with final guidelines.
3. City Council direct that City Planning staff use the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines in the review of applications for townhouse developments on corner lots and shallow mid-block sites along this stretch of Bayview Avenue prior to the final guidelines being adopted. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
On December 16, 2013 City Council directed staff to undertake a study of Bayview Avenue between Highway 401 and Lawrence Avenue East "to review the appropriate development framework for the lots abutting Bayview Avenue". This report provides Council with information on the Guiding Principles developed through meetings with the community and other stakeholders and outlines draft guidelines for townhouse developments fronting along this stretch of Bayview Avenue. The Guiding Principles and draft guidelines are intended to inform the review of proposed townhouse developments along this part of Bayview Avenue ensuring that new development fits with the unique character of the area.
The report recommends that City Council direct staff to hold a community consultation meeting to present the draft guidelines, to continue to refine the guidelines based on further work and consultation and to use the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines in the review of development applications prior to the final guidelines being adopted. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Status Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Bayview Avenue Townhouse Design Guidelines
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72167.pdf) |
| NY34.73 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:10 |
| Final Report - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 55 Antibes Drive |
| Bill 975 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Cmmunity Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509 as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report dated July 17, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
2. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
3. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Councillor James Pasternak asked that his opposition to the recommendations be noted in the record. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to permit the creation of conveyable lots for 5 blocks of freehold townhouses at 55 Antibes Drive, totalling 41 units (Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509).
The proposal complies with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.
This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Part Lot Control Exemption Application for 55 Antibes Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71654.pdf) |
| NY34.74 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Final Report - Extension of By-law 1050-2010, Exempting Lands from Part Lot Control - 939 Lawrence Avenue East, 49 and 75 The Donway West |
| Bill 990 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a By-law to extend the term of Part Lot Control Exemption By-law No. 1050-2010, to allow the lands municipally known as at 939 Lawrence Avenue East, 49 and 75 The Donway West to be exempt from Part Lot Control for an additional six year period from the expiry date of By-law No. 1050-2010, in accordance with the draft by-law in Attachment 2 to the report (July 15, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-law as may be required.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to register the by-law on title. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
On May 25, 2010, an application was submitted to permit exemption from Part Lot Control for 939 Lawrence Avenue East, and 49 and 75 The Donway West. The requested exemption was required to facilitate the financing and development of seven mixed-use buildings and associated permanent easements relating to an internal road system.
On August 27, 2010, Toronto City Council enacted By-law No. 1050-2010, exempting these lands from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act, for a period of four years.
This report recommends that By-law No. 1050-2012 be extended for an additional six years to allow for the completion of this project. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on an Extension of By-law 1050-2010, Exempting Lands from Part Lot Control for 939 Lawrence Avenue East, 49 and 75 The Donway West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71666.pdf) |
| NY34.75 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadocona Drive |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.
5. Prior to registration of the Condominium provide certification to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services from the Professional Engineer who designed and supervised the construction confirming that the stormwater management facilities and site grading have been constructed in accordance with the accepted Stormwater Management Report by John Towle Associates Ltd, dated November 2009, with a supplementary letter dated June 27, 2014 by John Towle Associates Ltd. and the accepted Grading Plans titled Site Grading Plan drawing C-2, by John Towle Associates Ltd, dated Nov. 16, 2013.
6. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to ensure compliance with the Site Plan Agreement, in particular the clearance to the parking areas, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner or her designate.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
8. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to establish a driveway as a common element at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive. The common elements condominium is required to provide legal vehicular access to eleven residential townhouse units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway by the condominium corporation.
The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the eleven residential townhouse units fronting Stadacona Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application and a Part Lot Control Exemption Application for 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadocona Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71631.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Rick Arblaster, Solicitor, on behalf of the applicant |
| NY34.76 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 851 Millwood Road |
| Bill 1058 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 851 Millwood Road, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1, Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Plan, dated April 7, 2014, and revised May 29, 2014, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 851 Millwood Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 3, Part Lot Control Exemption Plan, dated May 14, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application for Draft Plan of Condominium proposes the creation of a common element condominium comprised of a driveway and a day-lighting triangle, associated with five townhouse units. A concurrent application proposes exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to allow for the creation of conveyable lots for these five townhouse units.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the Part Lot Control exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Common Elements Condominium Application and a Part Lot Control Exemption Application for 851 Millwood Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71644.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Amanda Kosloski, Armstrong Planning & Project Management |
| NY34.77 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:34 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate |
| Bills 1005 and 1006 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The rezoning application proposes to redevelop the site with 67 townhouse units in 3 storey buildings with a density of 1.2 FSI. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71626.pdf) |
| NY34.78 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue |
| Bill 1007 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the following amendments:
a. That the provisions in the proposed by-law with regard to the single detached dewlling fronting on McKee Avenue be as follows:
i. The maximum width of the interior of the garage shall be 5.9 metres.
ii. The maximum width of the driveway shall be 6.1 metres.
b. That Schedule R3(20) in the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, be amended from 4.1 metres to .41 metres.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
|
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes six 3-storey townhouses facing Bayview Avenue and one single detached dwelling fronting on McKee Avenue, with vehicular access from McKee Avenue, at 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71699.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Melanie Melnyk, R. E. Millward & Associates |
| NY34.79 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - 50 Kenton Drive |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 50 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the enactment of the Bills to City Council, the owner shall enter into an Offer to Purchase agreement with the City, to purchase the Transwell Avenue walkway at market value, to the satisfaction of the Director of Real Estate Services.
4. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
These applications are to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and for Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval. They propose fifteen (15) single detached dwellings and a new public road (cul-de-sac), with vehicular access from the eastern portion of Kenton Drive, on a former school yard at 50 Kenton Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also advises that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment and a Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications for 50 Kenton Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71702.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| David Huynh, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the applicant |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Lucja Segal-Seiden (NY.New.NY34.79.1)
|
| NY34.80 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive |
| Communication NY34.80.5 has been submitted on this Item Bills 996 and 997 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law 1916, for the lands at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the former Town of Leaside By-law 1916 and City of Toronto By-law 569-2013 at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive to permit eight, three-storey townhouse units fronting onto McRae Drive and a detached dwelling facing onto Sutherland Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71681.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Douglas Obright |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (February 18, 2014) Letter from James Obright, addressed to Councillor Parker, on behalf of himself and 14 area residents (NY.Main.NY34.80.1)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners' Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY34.80.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49144.pdf) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Gary Rollerson (NY.New.NY34.80.3) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Gary Rollerson and JoAnne Barkeski (NY.New.NY34.80.4) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 21, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners' Assocation Incorporated (CC.Supp.NY34.80.5)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49545.pdf) |
| NY34.81 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 293 Viewmount Avenue |
| Communication NY34.81.6 has been submitted on this Item |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 293 Viewmount Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for a four-storey apartment building with 7 units and one level of below grade parking at 293 Viewmount Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 293 Viewmount Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72088.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Nick Saccone, President, Old Orchard Developments |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Odilia Rodrigues (NY.New.NY34.81.1)
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Carlos Lameiro (NY.New.NY34.81.2) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Joseph Figliomeni submitted by Ruth Rendon (NY.New.NY34.81.3) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from J. Nobrega, Wenderly Park Community Association (NY.New.NY34.81.4) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from J. Nobrega, Wenderly Park Community Association (NY.New.NY34.81.5) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 18, 2014) Letter from Tony Coiro (CC.Main.NY34.81.6)
|
| NY34.82 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 57, 59, 61, and 63 Finch Avenue West |
| Communications NY34.82.34 and NY34.82.35 have been submitted on this Item |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Zoning By-law 7625 for the former City of North York substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and as per the provisions outlined in the Section headed, "C. Draft Zoning By-law" contained on Pages 5 and 6 of the communication from Analogica dated August 10, 2014.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before the introduction of the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to obtain final Site Plan approval in accordance with Committee Recommendations 4 and 5 below, and to submit a letter of credit in order to secure improvements to the existing sanitary sewer in the amount of $114,100.00, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
4. City Council approve in-principle the site plan as indicated on the drawings and conditions listed in Attachment to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the plans be amended to include:
a. That general storage be provided at a minimum rate of 2m2 per unit.
b. That suite layouts, demonstrating that each unit contain appropriate residential amenities, be provided prior to final Site Plan approval.
c. That the applicant be required to move the rooftop mechanical units at least two metres northward, further away from the adjacent neighbourhood to the south.
d. That screening or other modifications be provided, as part of the final Site Plan, to minimize the potential for light pollution affecting adjacent single detached houses to the south and west.
e. That garbage be removed from the enclosed area no earlier than the morning of pick up and that the bins be placed back inside the enclosed area immediately following pickup.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner or her designate to give final approval to the site plan when the conditions to be satisfied prior to site plan approval as set out in Attachment 9 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and Committee Recommendation 4, above, have been fulfilled in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
6. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to fund landscape improvements on neighbouring properties to provide additional screening of the development. That such funding be provided following the submission of screening/buffer plans to the applicant by the owners of 4 Elmview Avenue and 5 Madeline Road (up to a maximum of $8,000 each) and 1 and 3 Madeline Road (up to a maximum of $4,000 each).
7. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to enter into arrangements satisfactory to the Chief Building Official or his designate regarding structural encroachment under, structural integrity of, and liability insurance for potential damage to, the abutting multiple attached houses located at 65-69 Finch Avenue West and the single detached houses located at 1, 3 and 5 Madeline Road and at 4 Elmview Avenue.
8. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to provide a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the responsible City staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
9. City Council authorize cash-in-lieu instead of on-site parkland dedication for this development, subject to no subsequent application of any kind for an increase in the height density or unit count of the development approved by Council prior to payment of the cash-in-lieu amount as specified by City Staff, and direct that payment by certified cheque or bank draft be accepted no earlier than issuance of the first below grade foundation permit and required no later than issuance of the first above grade structural permit. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
These applications propose to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of the subject lands for a four-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces accessed via a private driveway from Elmview Avenue. The proposal is located on an assembly of 4 lots at 57, 59, 61, and 63 Finch Avenue West.
The proposal provides for a multiple-unit residential use that will enhance the vibrancy and active nature of the Finch Avenue streetscape consistent with the objectives of the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Finch Avenue West and the building design will contribute to and enhance the public realm.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application and approval in principle of the Site Plan Control Application subject to the conditions outlined in this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications for 57, 59, 61, and 63 Finch Avenue West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71700.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Ryan Guetter, on behalf of the applicant |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 10, 2014) E-mail from group called, "Concerned Residents of Finch Avenue West Neighbourhood" and attached petition signed by 48 residents (NY.New.NY34.82.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from George Belza, Partner, Analogica, on behalf of the Edithvale-Yonge Community Association (NY.New.NY34.82.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49175.pdf) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Natasha Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.3) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Arnold Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.4) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Elena DeBiaisio (NY.New.NY34.82.5) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Julia Cao (NY.New.NY34.82.6) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Remo Naccarato (NY.New.NY34.82.7) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Alexandre Barykin (NY.New.NY34.82.8) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kathleen Zhang (NY.New.NY34.82.9) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from John Rosevear, submitted by Judy Rosevear (NY.New.NY34.82.10) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Primo Gazzoli (NY.New.NY34.82.11) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tom Hansen (NY.New.NY34.82.12) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Rosemary Gazzoli (NY.New.NY34.82.13) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Carmela Alviani (NY.New.NY34.82.14) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Yu-Han Hwang (NY.New.NY34.82.15) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Alan Poon (NY.New.NY34.82.16) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jian Yu Ma and JinXiu You (NY.New.NY34.82.17) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kim Hansen (NY.New.NY34.82.18) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jason Lim (NY.New.NY34.82.19) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jianying Shi (NY.New.NY34.82.20) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Gordon Chiu, Director, and Arik Klimov, Director, Toronto Common Elements Condominium Corporation #2053, on behalf of TCECC #2053, submitted by Gordon Chiu (NY.New.NY34.82.21) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Arnold Oslinger (NY.New.NY34.82.22) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Vincenzo Lamonica (NY.New.NY34.82.23) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Judith deBacker, submitted by William deBacker (NY.New.NY34.82.24) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Cindy Li (NY.New.NY34.82.25) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Daniel Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.26) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Karen (NY.New.NY34.82.27) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Gerard ter Hofstede (NY.New.NY34.82.28) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Anthony De Chellis (NY.New.NY34.82.29) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Linda Wilson (NY.New.NY34.82.30) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Layal Arous (NY.New.NY34.82.31) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Christopher Pereira (NY.New.NY34.82.32) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Virginia Evans (NY.New.NY34.82.33) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Robert E. Simpson (CC.Supp.NY34.82.34)
(August 24, 2014) Letter from Chi Ya-Lun, Jain Yingshi, Arnold Climor, Zerlina Liu, Jennifer Li, Cindy Li, Sam Li (CC.New.NY34.82.35) |
| NY34.83 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 396-404 Hopewell Avenue |
| Bills 1050 and 1051 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83, for the lands at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to conduct and secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. replace existing watermain on Hopewell Avenue with a new 200mm watermain from Times Road to Marlee Avenue in accordance with the accepted Functional Servicing Report and provide financial security in the amount of $600,000.00 and pay $33,900.00 for the engineering review fee.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a voluntary Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, such agreement(s) to be registered against the title of the lands for the development to secure the following facilities, services, and matters:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain the construction of a non-exclusive public pedestrian walkway to the City on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor in a location generally described as a north/south access over the central portion of the site, with details of the design to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the development and such walkway lands to be maintained by the owner at its sole cost;
b. parkland improvements by the owner to the Beltline park, adjacent to the development site, as illustrated in the concept plan submitted by the applicant as part of the development application, as revised to reflect details and comments from City Planning and Parks, Forestry & Recreation, and such improvements to be financially secured to the satisfaction of the City.
c. the applicant enter into a memorandum of understanding to construct additional improvements to the York BeltlineTrail for extension of the trail east from the rear of 396-404 Hopewell Avenue to Marlee Avenue, to the approval of the Chief Planner and to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
These applications propose to amend the City of Toronto Official Plan and former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 to permit the construction of a three storey stacked townhouse development arranged in four blocks on the site with a total of 81 dwelling at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 396-404 Hopewell Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72207.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Fax from Lodeliza T. Poblete (NY.New.NY34.83.1)
|
| NY34.84 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Application - 228 Wilson Avenue |
Communication NY34.84.8 has been submitted on this Item. Bill 1063 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a 17-storey (57 metre) condominium apartment building at 228 Wilson Avenue. The building will contain a total of 108 dwelling units which includes four 2-storey townhouses type units fronting Wilson Avenue. There are 130 parking spaces proposed within a 5 level below grade parking garage. Access to the site would be provided from a driveway off Wilson Avenue at the east end of the site.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the North York Zoning By-law 7625 and permit a 17-storey apartment building at 228 Wilson Avenue. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Application for 228 Wilson Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71682.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Marie Worobec, IBI Group |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Hugh Fraser, Corridor Management Planner, Ontario Ministry of Transportation (NY.New.NY34.84.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49208.pdf) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Michelle Collis (NY.New.NY34.84.2) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Marjorie Fainer Vaile (NY.New.NY34.84.3) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Deborah Ylanko (NY.New.NY34.84.4) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Brian Bennett (NY.New.NY34.84.5) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Arto Tikiryan (NY.New.NY34.84.6) (August 7, 2014) Letter from France Rochette (NY.New.NY34.84.7) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from David C. K. Tang, Gowlings Lafleur Henderson LLP (CC.New.NY34.84.8)
|
| NY34.85 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 2384-2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue |
| Bills 1028, 1029 and 1030 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 15 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2014, for the lands at 31 Montgomery Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 16 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District .
3. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86, for the lands at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street, and 31 Montgomery Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District subject to the following additional amendments:
a. that section 9(i) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment be amended to read as follows:
Parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the lot in accordance with the following:
i. a minimum of 0.2 parking spaces per bachelor dwelling unit;
ii. a minimum of 0.4 parking spaces per one bedroom dwelling unit;
iii. a minimum of 0.6 parking spaces per two bedroom dwelling unit;
iv. a minimum of 0.8 parking spaces per three bedroom dwelling unit;
v. a minimum of 0.1 parking spaces per dwelling unit for visitors to the building;
b. that a new section be added to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to allow for patio use on a portion of the lot that provides as follows:
i. none of the provisions of Zoning By-law No. 438-86 or this By-law shall apply to prevent a patio in the area identified as "Area A" on Map 2 of this By-law.
c. that Map 2 of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached to the motion submitted by Councillor Stintz, be revised to allow for patio use on a portion of the lot.
d. that a new section be added to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to provide that in the event of a future division of the ownership between the residential and non-residential components of the development, all maintenance obligations regarding the proposed park, shall be borne by the owner of the non-residential portion of the lot, while all the obligations with respect to the public walkway easement at the west end of the development, shall be borne by the owner of the residential portion of the lot.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By law Amendments as may be required.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the property at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, such agreement to be subsequently registered against title to the lot, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in consultation with the Manager Heritage Preservation Services.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, such agreement(s) to be registered against the title of the lands for the development to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the City standard form, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00), to guarantee the cost for public art on the lands, such public art to be provided by the owner, where such amount shall be the maximum public art contribution and such amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, where such indexing shall not commence until August 31, 2015, unless a letter of credit to secure such contribution has been provided prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, subject to the exclusions noted above and the necessary amendment to Appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District be amended accordingly. The owner shall submit a Public Art Plan that is in accordance with the City's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and details the public art process to the satisfaction of City Council.
b. the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the City standard form, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00), to guarantee the cost for streetscape improvements to be provided by the owner, to Yonge Street, Helendale Avenue and Montgomery Avenue abutting the site and parkland, such streetscape improvements in accordance with designs to be approved in connection with the Midtown in Focus, Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan Study for Yonge-Eglinton, the details of which to be determined in association with site plan approval, where such amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto where such indexing shall not commence until August 31, 2015, unless a letter of credit to secure such contribution has been provided prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit subject to the exclusions noted above. The owner may, in consultation with City Staff, increase the scope of the streetscape improvements so as to take advantage of Development Charge credits available therefor; Appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, be amended accordingly.
c. the owner shall provide a non-exclusive public pedestrian easement to the City on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor in a location generally described as a north/south access over the western portion of the site, with details of the location and final design to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the development and that such easement lands be maintained by the owner at its sole cost. The conveyance of the easement shall be for nominal consideration at no cost to the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the owner shall be responsible to prepare, submit to the City for approval and deposit all required reference plans to describe the easement.
d. the owner shall provide a minimum of four (4), three-bedroom units in the building.
e. the owner shall maintain the public park having an area of not less than 264 square metres, at its sole expense, after its conveyance to the City and subject to terms and conditions to be contained in the Section 37 agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation together with provisions for protections and indemnification of the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in connection with maintenance including but not limited to the regular year round maintenance of landscaping and landscape surfacing including removal of snow and ice, fixtures, irrigation, electrical, fences or other structures which form part of the park installations, and, arrangements with respect to inspection of the park and park installations by the City.
f. the following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. the owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the property at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, such agreement to be subsequently registered against title to the lot, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in consultation with the Manager Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. prior to the issuance of final Site Plan Approval for all or any portion of the lot through the Site Plan Approval process pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner shall:
1. provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects, dated June 2, 2014 and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. provide final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the lot, excluding the portion of the lot known municipally in the year 2014 as 31 Montgomery Avenue, including pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act and the Building Code Act and including any permit for excavation and shoring or foundation, but excluding a permit for the removal of the one storey addition to the rear of the heritage structure, a rental/sales centre, repairs, maintenance and usual and minor works acceptable to the Manager Heritage Preservation Services, the owner of the lot shall:
1. obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the property at 2384-2388 Yonge Street, such amendment to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
2. have obtained final Site Plan Approval for such property, for an above-grade building permit only;
3. provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protection measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager Heritage Preservation Services, except in the case of any below-grade building permits, only the subject building permit drawings are to be provided;
4. provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage structure will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above-grade building permit only;
5. provide an Interpretation Plan for Postal Station K, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above-grade building permit only; and
6. provide a letter of credit to the City in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager Heritage Preservation Services prior to the issuance of any permit pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act for all or any part of the lot, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the letter of credit is provided.
iv. prior to the release of such letter of credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager Heritage Preservation Services;
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
v. the owner shall construct and convey to the City, within three years after the date of the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, for nominal consideration a public park having a minimum size of 264 square metres with such conveyance deemed to fully satisfy the parkland contribution requirements for the development as currently proposed, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of parkland conveyance as are set out in Attachment 14 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District with the following amendments:
1. allow the proposed parkland dedication to be subject to:
a. a 3.0 metre wide pedestrian access easement connecting Yonge Street to the front of the heritage building.
b. easements to provide, maintain, replace, etc, hydro and water for the Development, the terms of such easements to be satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation, including the requirement that the Park will be reinstated with the materials and as per the approved Park Plan, at the owners expense should any services in the easements need to be replaced or repaired; but otherwise the conveyance to be free and clear, above and below grade easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements unless approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation.
The City shall accept the parkland dedication subject to the foregoing easements in complete fulfillment of the parkland dedication or cash in lieu thereof requirements of the Planning Act for the Development. So there is no uncertainty, Council consents to the above noted easements and encroachments or obstructions in the context of section 3.2.3 of the City of Toronto Official Plan, and confirms there shall be no requirement for additional cash in lieu payment(s) as a consequence thereof;
2. delete the requirement for indexing the letter of credit for the Above Base Park Improvements; and
3. appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District be amended accordingly.
7. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
8. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Roads and Related component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the streetscape Improvements in excess of the $100,000 amount referred to in Recommendation 3, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the above base streetscape Improvements in excess of the $100,000 amount referred to in Recommendation 6.b. above, and the Roads and Related component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
9. City Council, having regard to Section 3.2.3, Policy 8. (a) of the Official Plan, approves the acceptance of the conveyance of parkland for Montgomery Square subject to the pedestrian and service easements, referenced in Recommendations 6.f.v.1.a. and 6.f.v.1.b., above, and that no additional cash in lieu payments be payable in connection therewith. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
North York Community Council requested that the developer agree to meet for one meeting with representatives of the community to receive their input on the site plan by the end of August 2014. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes a 27-storey mixed-use building, 79.5 metre high (excluding mechanical penthouses) with 233 rental dwelling units at 2384 – 2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue. The proposal includes the retention of the 2-storey historically significant Postal Station K building on the site and proposes its conservation and reuse for retail uses. The application also proposes the conveyance of public parkland along the Yonge Street, Montgomery Avenue and Helendale Avenue frontages of the site as a civic square – Montgomery Square.
The proposal conserves and adaptively reuses a historic site of national, provincial and municipal interest. The proposal reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Yonge Street consistent with the policies of the Official Plan and Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. The proposal to dedicate on-site public parkland and the creation of a new civic square along Yonge Street - Montgomery Square will make a significant positive contribution to the public realm in Yonge –Eglinton. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-17 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 2384-2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72238.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Sean Boulton |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Christine Doyle, Board of Directors, Stanley Knowles Housing Co-operative (NY.New.NY34.85.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49215.pdf) (August 8, 2014) Letter from Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (NY.New.NY34.85.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49216.pdf) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) (NY.New.NY34.85.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49264.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Councillor Stintz, forwarding a revised Map 2 of Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (NY.New.NY34.85.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49378.pdf) |
| NY34.86 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Refusal Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 191 and 193 Empress Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the application for the reasons outlined in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
|
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment have been submitted for the lands located at 191 and 193 Empress Avenue. The applications are to permit a residential development consisting of 8, three-storey townhouse dwellings.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and seek Council's direction for staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the development should the application be appealed. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Refusal Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 191 and 193 Empress Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71588.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from Janice Robinson, Goldberg Group (NY.New.NY34.86.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49217.pdf) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Edna and Robert Jardine (NY.New.NY34.86.2) |
| NY34.87 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:10 |
| Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Applications - 719 Sheppard Avenue West |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to support the Draft Official Plan Amendment (Attachment 6) and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Attachment 7), attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with a holding provision ("H") placed on the site, due to outstanding sanitary capacity issues, to be lifted at such a time as the sanitary servicing solution is acceptable, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, North District.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board not to issue its Order on the Site Plan appeal until such time as Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) have been finalized to the satisfaction to the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, North York District, and all pre-approval conditions, including entering into a Site Plan Agreement, have been met. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing has been set for September 22, 2014.
This application proposes a nine-storey (27.7-metre), 91-unit building on the south side of Sheppard Avenue West, immediately east of Harlock Boulevard. A total of 6,785m2 of gross floor area is proposed which would result in a density of 3.86 times the area of the lot. A total of 101 parking spaces are proposed on 3 underground levels, including 14 spaces for visitors.
The report recommends that City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff, to attend the OMB hearing to support the position outlined in this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Applications for 719 Sheppard Avenue West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71829.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Chris Pereira, M. Behar Planning and Design Inc., on behalf of the applicant |
| NY34.88 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize City staff, in consultation with the local Councillor, to continue disscussions with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, shall be addressed including:
a. revising the treatment of bulk and mass along the south elevation of the residential building so that the upper floors are stepped back from the main building wall and such floors include detailed elevation articulation such as material changes and/or glazing to address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan and revise the design of the lower floors of the south elevation to include a stronger base expression to complement the scale of the place of worship;
b. providing a 5 metre wide landscaped pedestrian walkway along the entire west property line to accommodate a mid-block pedestrian connection between Sheppard Avenue East and the future east-west public street, and the northwest corner of the site be designed to include a "Gateway" feature in keeping with the objectives of the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan;
c. the front yard setback of the place of worship increased to provide sufficient space for a forecourt, continuous weather protection, seating opportunities and main entrance as well as modifications to the building design to give the building a stronger civic presence;
d. providing common indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas at a rate of 1.5 m² per dwelling unit;
e. the submission of a Heritage Impact Statement to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
f. the owner addressing the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 27, 2014 to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
g. the owner addressing the outstanding comments outlined in the memorandum dated July 16, 2014 from the Manager, Engineering and Construction Services, North York District;
h. a reduction in the gross floor area as a result of addressing the recommendations above; and
i. the owner addressing any further comments received from the revised submission and further processing of the application.
j. the applicant making every effort to reduce the maximum number of storeys of the proposed buildings to be no more than the neighbouring building immediately to the east of this site at Sheppard Avenue and Rean Drive.
4. In the event that the OMB allows the appeal on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order until such time as:
a. an appropriate Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and bicycle parking spaces and loading, maximum building heights, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units and unit sizes, phasing, minimum common indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor that are generally in keeping with other Section 37 contributions within the Secondary Plan area and which may involve a Site Specific Official Plan Amendment for the provision of specific uses and facilities not listed in Figure 4.3.3 Incentives in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan;
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
i. the gross floor area of the common indoor recreational amenity area exempted from the calculation of gross floor area;
ii. the gross floor area of the Place of Worship exempted from the calculation of gross floor area; and
iii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009; and
c. the Board withholding its Order on the Site Plan Control application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the City's Notice of Approval Conditions has been finalized and any pre-approval conditions satisfied.
5. Subject to the applicant addressing the issues raised in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the parkland dedication requirements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of Above Base Park Improvements for a 406m² linear park to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
|
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applications propose an amendment to the Official Plan, the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan and former City of North Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a mixed use development with residential, retail and office uses and a new place of worship at 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East. The proposal comprises a 6 to 10-storey mixed use building containing 186-units, two floors of 1,676m² of retail and office space along the Sheppard Avenue East frontage, a new free-standing 1,279m² place of worship to replace an existing facility on 593 Sheppard Avenue East, 267 parking spaces and 160 bicycle parking spaces. The total proposed is 18,513m² resulting in a density of 3.97 FSI.
On February 11, 2014 the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act. On June 19, 2014 the applicant appealed associated Site Plan Control application to the OMB. A pre-hearing conference was held on July 14, 2014. A second prehearing is scheduled for September 26, 2014.
On June 11, 2014 the applications were formally revised and under review at the time of the appeals.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the applications in their current form. The proposal does not address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan, built form changes to the proposal are necessary to satisfy the on-site parkland dedication requirements and the potential impacts that the proposal may have on the heritage property immediately west of the site need to be assessed. The report also outlines concerns with the design of the proposed place of worship, the need to provide additional indoor and outdoor amenity spaces on the site, and the provision for a mid-block pedestrian connection through the site, and Section 37 contributions. The report also advises there are a number of outstanding technical matters that still need to be resolved to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues raised in this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications at 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72190.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Vince Higgins, President, TSCC 1841, Claridges |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Vince Higgins, President, TSCC 1841 Claridges, on behalf of Claridges, Amica at Bayview and New York Towers Community Alliance (NY.New.NY34.88.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49218.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Leslie Mezei and Katherine Mezei (NY.New.NY34.88.2) |
| NY34.89 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Request for Direction Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - 5, 7, 9, 11 & 15 Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions, in consultation with the local Councillor, with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, shall be addressed including:
a. the provision for a 20 metre wide public road along the southern portion of the site;
b. a reduction in the building height along the Kenaston Gardens frontage and relocating some of the floor area to the northwest corner of the site;
c. extending the built form along Sheppard Avenue East as well as the southerly building wing to the east property lines to create a zero lot line/grade party wall condition;
d. east building elevations designed to include detailed elevation articulation and/or building finishes that complement the architectural character of the main façade and a "Gateway" feature at the northwest corner of the site in keeping with the objectives of the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan; and
e. an improved grade relationship between the finished ground floor elevation of the proposed development and the existing/proposed linear park.
4. In the event that the OMB allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments for the subject lands until such time as:
a. an appropriate Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and bicycle parking spaces and loading, maximum building heights, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor that are in generally keeping with other Section 37 contributions within the Secondary Plan area and which may involve a Site Specific Official Plan Amendment for the provision of specific uses and facilities not listed in Figure 4.3.3 Incentives in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan;
In addition to the above, the following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
i. the gross floor area of the indoor private recreational amenity area exempted from the calculation of gross floor area;
ii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.
c. the Owner has submitted a Plan of Subdivision application to secure all matters relating to the public road and parkland including above base park improvements.
d. the Board withholding its Order on the Site Plan Control application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the City's Notice of Approval Conditions has been finalized, and any pre-approval conditions have been satisfied;
e. the Owner has addressed the requirements outlined in the memorandums dated October 7, 2013 and May 21, 2014 to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
f. the Owner has addressed the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 19, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Manager, Engineering and Construction Services, North York District;
g. the owner addressing any further comments received on the most recent submission and through the further review of the application; and
h. the height being reduced to be more in keeping with the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan.
5. Subject to addressing the issues raised in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and satisfying the comments outlined in the October 7, 2013 and May 21, 2014 comments from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of Above Base Park Improvements to a proposed 227 m² park to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
6 City Council direct that the City not issue a Limiting Distance Agreement along the property line adjacent to the Sheppard Avenue Linear Park. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applications propose an amendment to the Official Plan, the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan, the former City of North Zoning By-law No. 7625 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a mixed use development at 5, 7, 9, 11 and 15 Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East. The proposal comprises a 12-storey mixed use building with a gross floor area of 18,223 m² containing 245 dwelling units, 249 m² of grade related retail space, 212 parking spaces and 188 bicycle parking spaces. The proposal yields a density of 3.99 FSI.
On June 12, 2014 the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications and the Site Plan Control application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act.
A hearing has been scheduled for November 5-7, 2014.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the applications in their current form. Built form changes are required to address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan along Kenaston Gardens and satisfy the requirements of Transportation Services to provide a public road on the southern portion of the site. The report also outlines concerns with the proposed grade relationship along the Sheppard Avenue East frontage of the site adjacent to the existing/future linear park as well as concerns with the design of the building along the east elevation at Sheppard Avenue East. The report also advises there are a number of outstanding technical matters that still need to be resolved to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services.
Given the locational attributes of the site within this neighbourhood, its close proximity to the Bayview Subway Station and approved and/or built form context in the area, staff could support density beyond the maximum 3.0 FSI assigned in the Secondary Plan at this location, subject to the applicant addressing the issues raised in this report.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues raised in this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications for 5, 7, 9, 11 & 15 Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72260.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Edna and Robert Jardine [This communication was originally distributed on Item NY34.89, but was submitted for Item NY34.86. It has now been listed on that Item.] (NY.New.NY.34.89.1)
|
| NY34.90 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications - 103 Bayview Ridge |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent applications in the current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to address the issues outlined in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. Should the OMB approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order(s) approving the applications until such time as:
a. the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;
b. all pre-approval conditions have been met for the Site Plan Control application; and
c. all conditions of approval have been satisfied for the Consent application. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Site Plan Control and Consent applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A Preliminary Hearing has been set for August 20, 2014.
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit six townhouse units fronting onto Bayview Avenue and two detached dwellings fronting onto Bayview Ridge. The existing single-detached dwelling would be demolished.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for staff representation at the OMB. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications for 103 Bayview Ridge
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72193.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Kim. M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis, on behalf of the applicant (NY.New.NY34.90.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49221.pdf) |
| NY34.91 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications - 108 Bayview Ridge |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent applications in the current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to address the issues outlined in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. Should the OMB approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order(s) approving the applications until such time as:
a. the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;
b. all pre-approval conditions have been met for the Site Plan Control application; and
c. all conditions of approval have been satisfied for the Consent application. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Site Plan Control and Consent applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A Preliminary Hearing has been set for August 20, 2014.
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit five townhouse units fronting onto Bayview Avenue and two detached dwellings fronting onto Bayview Ridge. The existing single-detached dwelling would be demolished.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for staff representation at the OMB. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attchments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications for 108 Bayview Ridge
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72117.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Kim. M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis, on behalf of the applicant (NY.New.NY34.91.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49138.pdf) |
| NY34.92 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:33 |
| Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the built form changes and design related matters raised in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and any issues that may arise from the further review.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including:
a. the proposed floor area redeployed along the Forest Manor Road frontage above the entrance driveways so as to connect Buildings B2 and B3 and Buildings C2 and C3. As a minimum, the height of the proposed 3-storey bases on Buildings B3 and C3 should be increased to define the edge of the street as outlined in the Parkway Forest Context Plan;
b. sufficient information to confirm the ground floor uses for all buildings on Blocks B and C have views onto and, where possible, access to, adjacent streets;
c. a revised proposal that replaces the shared loading area proposed on Block C, at the corner of Helen Lu Road and Don Mills Road, with more active, at grade residential units that compliments the design proposed for Building B1 at the corner of George Henry Boulevard and Don Mills Road;
d. a revised submission that demonstrates an increased separation distance has been provided between Buildings B1 and B2 and Buildings C1 and C2 so as to improve views and privacy between the buildings as well as, to provide additional space for landscaping;
e. submit an updated phasing/master plan, such plan to be incorporated into an agreement, which sets out the remaining phases and number of dwelling units within each building to determine the number of dwelling units that would be associated with each of the remaining holding symbols;
f. the applicant addressing any further comments received from the revised submission and further processing of the application; and
g. the number of one bedroom units within the specified gross floor area be reduced by 25 and that the available square footage that results be dedicated to the construction of three bedroom units.
4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal on the Zoning By-law Amendment application in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order until such time as:
a. an appropriate Zoning By-law amendment is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and loading standards, maximum building heights, building transition, maximum building floor plates and envelopes, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, phasing, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity area, bicycle parking spaces, and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor requiring the Owner to:
i. Provide a cash contribution of $500,000.00 to be used towards parks improvements to Parkway Forest Park;
ii Provide a cash contribution of $30,000.00 to assess the transportation effects of full build-out of the development for additional traffic monitoring in the area surrounding the development which will include all modes of transportation - vehicle, walking, cycling and transit;
The above contribution is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development, with such amounts to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.
The following matter is to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
iii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measure of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009;
c. the applicant addressing the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 25, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Engineering and Construction Services and at no cost to the City of Toronto.
5. City Council direct that the alternative parkland dedication calculations be finalized at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Chief Planner.
6. City Council direct that Section 2(ww)(xiv)(4) of By-law 865-2008 (OMB), which outlines that every first purchaser of each dwelling unit and each tenant relocated to a new rental replacement building receive a one annual 12-month subscription be deleted, and that City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the March 1, 2008 S37 agreement accordingly.
7. City Council direct that the outcome of this meeting be communicated by City Planning staff to the community bordered by Sheppard Avenue East, Highway 401, Highway 404 and Leslie Street and that the associated costs be borne by the applicant. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York |
| Summary |
This application proposes an amendment to site specific Zoning By-law No. 865-2008(OMB) zoning by-law to permit 600 additional dwelling units on lands in the Parkway Forest community municipally known as 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard. The proposed dwelling units would be accommodated in redesigned and reconfigured buildings on Blocks B and C located on the east side of Don Mills Road and on Blocks D (Buildings D2 and D4) and E (Building E2). No amendments are proposed with respect to gross floor area and density.
The application also proposes amendments to the three remaining holding ("H") symbols appended to site specific Zoning By-law No. 865-2008(OMB). The proposed amendments include changes to the maximum number of dwelling units associated with each holding symbol and the pre-conditions to be fulfilled for the removal of each of the remaining holding symbols.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council that on May 5, 2014 the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act, and to seek direction regarding staff representation at the upcoming OMB hearing. A 2-day hearing is scheduled to commence October 2, 2014.
The applications were under review at the time of the appeal. Since that time the applicant has been working with staff to address outstanding design matters and technical requirements. Revised submissions were received May 1, 2014, May 20, 2014, June 27, 2014 and July 4, 2014 and are currently under review.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the proposal in its current form. The report is recommending built form changes including a redeployment of proposed floor area to provide additional building mass along the Forest Manor Road frontages, an increased separation distance between the proposed mid-rise buildings along Don Mills Road and the proposed 24-storey apartment buildings on Blocks B and C and streetscape improvements along the south side of Helen Lu Road near Don Mills Road. The report also recommends the applicant provide information to confirm the ground floor uses for all buildings to address Official Plan policies regarding grade relationships.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the matters outlined in this report and any issues that may arise from the further review.
Staff is also recommending City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its final Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the matters set out in the report are addressed. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72634.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72237.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Cameron Ridler |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Jim Lucey, on behalf of York Condominium Corporation #24 (NY.New.NY34.92.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49237.pdf) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Cathy Reid (NY.New.NY34.92.2) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from June Mollenbeck, Treasurer, Parkway Forest Community Association (NY.New.NY34.92.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49239.pdf) |
| NY34.94 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| Refusal Report - Official Plan Amendment, Rental Housing Conversion under Municipal Code Chapter 667, and Draft Plan of Condominium Applications - 1477 Bayview Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse Official Plan Amendment application 12 287930 NNY 26 OZ, Residential Rental Demolition and Conversion application 12 288059 NNY 26 RH, and Draft Plan of Condominium Application 12 288046 NNY 26 CD.
2. If the Official Plan Amendment and Draft Plan of Condominium applications are appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council direct the City Solicitor together with other appropriate City staff to appear before the Board in opposition to any appeals filed in respect to these applications.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The Official Plan Amendment, Residential Rental Housing Conversion, and Draft Plan of Condominium applications propose to convert the existing 10 rental residential buildings containing 104 rental units into a condominium.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of these three applications, and seeks Council's direction for staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board should any appeals be filed on the Official Plan Amendment and Draft Plan of Condominium applications. The Residential Rental Housing Conversion application is not appealable to the Ontario Municipal Board.
This report also sets out staff's comments on the applications and discusses the results of the public consultation. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Refusal Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment, Rental Housing Conversion under Municipal Code Chapter 667, and Draft Plan of Condominium Applications for 1477 Bayview Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71698.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Mark McMackin |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Gloria Beatty (NY.New.NY34.94.1)
(August 7, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Edith Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Propert Owners' Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY34.94.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49147.pdf) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Judith Waugh (NY.New.NY34.94.3) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Pat Poole (NY.New.NY34.94.4) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Bruce Raymond (NY.New.NY34.94.5) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Kathy Brown (NY.New.NY34.94.6) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from John and Joan Turbach (NY.New.NY34.94.7) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Bev Ball (NY.New.NY34.94.8) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Thomas Donovan (NY.New.NY34.94.9) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Sheena D. Robertson (NY.New.NY34.94.10) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Bernie Gelfand (NY.New.NY34.94.11) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Kathie Droy (NY.New.NY34.94.12) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Jim and Margaret Taylor (NY.New.NY34.94.13) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Cheryl Gateman (NY.New.NY34.94.14) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Carole Supak submitted by Cheryl Gateman (NY.New.NY34.94.15) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Claire Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.16) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Ron and Paula Forde (NY.New.NY34.94.17) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Susan Bell (NY.New.NY34.94.18) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Gwen Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.19) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mark Duffield (NY.New.NY34.94.20) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Martha Johnson (NY.New.NY34.94.21) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Michael D. Willson (NY.New.NY34.94.22) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Laurie Prockter (NY.New.NY34.94.23) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Cynthia Hawkins (NY.New.NY34.94.24) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Dr. John S. Arrowood (NY.New.NY34.94.25) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kelly McCarten (NY.New.NY34.94.26) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.27) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Margaret Christieson (NY.New.NY34.94.28) |
| NY34.95 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 1100 Briar Hill Avenue |
| Communication NY34.95.85 has been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to hire the necessary external consultants to defend the existing zoning by-laws on site, and direct all consultants together with any other appropriate City staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the applicant’s appeal respecting Zoning By-law Amendment application City File No. 13 221087 NNY 15 OZ for 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
2. City Council direct City staff to not negotiate with the Appellant/Applicant and all requesting Party Status entities prior to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing regarding Zoning By-law Amendment Application City File No. 13 221087 NNY 15OZ for 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into minutes of settlement only if the proposed settlement plan substantially conforms with the current existing by-law permissions and a full settlement with all Parties is achieved.
4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as a site plan agreement has been entered into between the City and the owner and in consultation with the local Councillor and local residents, and the site plan agreement be reported back to North York Community Council.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold any final Orders approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the Owner has entered into and registered a Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
6. City Council request City staff to look at the feasibility of re-orientating the proposed on-site parkland dedication to encompass the registered archaeological site (Ak-GU89) where old school house foundation remains were located, and to incorporate the school foundation as a key feature of the park.
7. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board include in any Order that the owner of the subject property which is amended to Mixed Use Commercial Zone (C5) or any other Commercial Zone be required to erect a City approved “Precast Concrete Fence” along the entire north and east perimeter of the applicant’s/owner’s private property, where it adjoins the property of landowners of single-family detached dwellings residing in “One-Family Detached Dwelling Residential Density Zones” (R2 and R5).
8. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board in the matter of Case No. 140368, to reschedule the November 25, 2014 hearing date until such time as the landowners provincially directed investigation of the Stage 4 Archaeological Assessment (Ak-GU89 ) being undertaken of the site is completed and has been reviewed and commented on by City Planning Heritage Preservation Services and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing has been set for November 25, 2014. The Site Plan Control Application (file no. 13 221111 NNY 15 SA) has not been appealed by the applicant to the OMB.
The application proposes to amend both the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and the former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83 to permit the development of 124 stacked back-to-back townhouse units and 4 commercial units with underground parking located at 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
The report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff, attend the OMB hearing in opposition to the current proposal. It also recommends that staff continue to work with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the outstanding issues and achieve a settlement. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 1100 Briar Hill Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72206.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Brian Rose (Submission Filed) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (September 19, 2013) Petition from local residents, containing 423 signatures (NY.Main.NY34.95.1)
(August 5, 2014) E-mail from Maria Coiro (NY.New.NY34.95.2) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Grace Bianco (NY.New.NY34.95.3) (August 8, 2014) Fax from Sam and Susan Pagano (NY.New.NY34.95.4) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Diep Dinh (NY.New.NY34.95.5) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Kim Sartor (NY.New.NY34.95.6) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Gustavo Macias Mosquera (NY.New.NY34.95.7) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Yuan Xu (NY.New.NY34.95.8) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Doug Warwick (NY.New.NY34.95.9) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Aldo Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.10) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Dennis and Luisa Trej (NY.New.NY34.95.11) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Michelle Zhang (NY.New.NY34.95.12) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Robert Bianchi (NY.New.NY34.95.13) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Lidia Worth and Victor Marques (NY.New.NY34.95.14) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Grace Matthies - Rhea Plesman (NY.New.NY34.95.15) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Angela Tocci (NY.New.NY34.95.16) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Ali Unlucay (NY.New.NY34.95.17) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Maurini (NY.New.NY34.95.18) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Anna Scarano (NY.New.NY34.95.19) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Bruno DeAngelis (NY.New.NY34.95.20) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Granieri Family (NY.New.NY34.95.21) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Donato Tocci (NY.New.NY34.95.22) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Duke McKenzie (NY.New.NY34.95.23) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Joi Guttman-Young (NY.New.NY34.95.24) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Antonio Mare (NY.New.Ny34.95.25) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Dieu Guang and Anh Vuong (NY.New.Ny34.95.26) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Teresina Mantello (NY.New.NY34.95.27) (August 10, 2014) Letter from P. Dasimonte (NY.New.NY34.95.28) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Rui Favas (NY.New.NY34.95.29) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Polimeni (NY.New.NY34.95.30) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Gerrada Pappa (NY.New.Ny34.95.31) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Bruno Perrella (NY.New.NY34.95.32) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Shu Qing Jiang (NY.New.NY34.95.33) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Vultaggio (NY.New.NY34.95.34) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Anna Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.35) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Deb Testani (NY.New.NY34.95.36) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Aldo Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.37) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Bosko Maric (NY.New.NY34.95.38) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Antonia D'Amario (NY.New.NY34.95.39) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Esterina Bonofiglio (NY.New.NY34.95.40) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Ron Matheson (NY.New.NY34.95.41) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Darla Matheson (NY.New.NY34.95.42) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Oleg Nesterenko (NY.New.NY34.95.43) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Grazia Lombarolo (NY.New.NY34.95.44) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Carlos Carvalho (NY.New.NY34.95.45) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Gina Grirolina (NY.New.NY34.95.46) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Maria Aguirre (NY.New.NY34.95.47) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Vishnu Radharrishnan (NY.New.NY34.95.48) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Maria Neiva (NY.New.NY34.95.49) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Blanca Cajamarla (NY.New.NY34.95.50) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Robert Leszeynsik (NY.New.NY34.95.51) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Giovanni Pizzonia (NY.New.NY34.95.52) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Franca Pizzonia (NY.New.NY34.95.53) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Romy Navarro (NY.New.NY34.95.54) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Fernando Ste Ane (NY.New.NY34.95.55) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Roberto Canedo (NY.New.NY34.95.56) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Brian Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.57) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Laura Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.58) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Estrella Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.59) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Diep Dinh (NY.New.NY34.95.60) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Dorothy Lapell (NY.New.NY34.95.61) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Melisa Walasek (NY.New.NY34.95.62) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Jocelyn Best (NY.New.NY34.95.63) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Yolanda Viassone (NY.New.NY34.95.64) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Michele Abate (NY.New.NY34.95.65) (August 10, 2014) Letter from A. Chiavaroli (NY.New.NY34.95.66) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Jhave Trinidad (NY.New.NY34.95.67) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Dusan Mijatovic (NY.New.NY34.95.68) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Elsa Dela Cruz (NY.New.NY34.95.69) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Cristeta Mendoza (NY.New.NY34.95.70) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Satha Viverananthan (NY.New.NY34.95.71) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Ana Cristina Chirila (NY.New.NY34.95.72) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Tudor Chirila (NY.New.NY34.95.73) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Felicidad Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.74) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Larry Lopez (NY.New.NY34.95.75) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Fernando Escaro (NY.New.NY34.95.76) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Angeles Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.77) (August 10, 2014) Letter from Savitri Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.78) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tony and Arlete Dias (NY.New.NY34.95.79) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tony and Arlete Dias (NY.New.NY34.95.80) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from JN Nobrega (NY.New.NY34.95.81) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Josephine De Souza (NY.New.NY34.95.82) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Maria Coiro (NY.New.NY34.95.83) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Brian Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.84) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 21, 2014) Submission from Mato Roncevic, Co-Chair, Briar Hill Stayner Community Committee (CC.Supp.NY34.95.85)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49530.pdf) |
| NY34.96 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Status Report - Dufferin Street Avenue Study |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Staff and the consultant to finalize the Transportation and Infrastructure Master Plans and that staff provide notification for public review and comment upon completion of the Master Plans in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process.
2. City Council direct City Staff to use the recommendations contained in the report (July 21, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the Dufferin Street Avenue Study (DSAS) Final Report as a guide for drafting the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law to create site and area specific policies and new zoning provisions suited to this Avenue segment, and any other appropriate planning tools, that address the matters identified in this report, including, but not limited to: the appropriate mix of residential and non-residential uses; new streets and blocks, standards regulating built form, height, building setbacks and stepbacks, appropriate separation distances, appropriate transition in scale to Neighbourhoods and Employment Areas, angular planes, parking and bicycle and other performance measures for the segment; the community improvements that are needed to support growth and community benefits to be sought under Section 37 of the Planning Act; and the phasing of growth with transportation and servicing improvements.
3. City Council direct City Staff to conduct community consultation on a draft Official Plan Amendment, amendments to the Zoning By-laws, and other planning tools and necessary Implementation Strategies prior to bringing forward these planning tools and strategies to North York Community Council's consideration. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
This report provides a summary of the Dufferin Street Avenue Study (DSAS) for the portion of Dufferin Street from Highway 401 to just south of Lawrence Avenue West. City staff, the Ward Councillor, the City's consultants, and members of the local community have worked together to develop a vision and framework for new development and the improvement of the public realm on this portion of Dufferin Street. Following from the Study's findings, the report outlines key issues and recommendations, as well as next steps in preparing draft amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
The implementation of this study will include a site and area specific Official Plan policy, a new zoning regime suited to this Avenue segment, Urban Design Guidelines to guide development on this portion of Dufferin Street, a Parks and Open Space Strategy, a Community Services and Facilities Strategy, and a Transportation and Infrastructure Master Plan.
This report recommends that Council authorize staff to use the recommendations contained in this report and the consultant's Final Report as a guide to draft Official Plan policies and other appropriate planning tools, forming part of staff's final report to Council, and further community consultation in the second quarter of 2015. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Status Report and Attachments 1-11 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on the Dufferin Street Avenue Study
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71691.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Erin Tito, Urban Strategies Inc., on behalf of Oxford Properties (NY.New.NY34.96.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49242.pdf) |
| NY34.98 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 200 Ridley Boulevard |
| Communications NY34.98.36 to NY34.98.38 have been submitted on this Item. Bill 1064 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 200 Ridley Boulevard substantially in accordance with the revised draft Zoning By-law Amendment and list of Section 37 benefits as per Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, based on the outcome of the tenant consultation meeting held on July 9, 2014.
2. City Council approve the inclusion of the following additional items, received from residents at 200 Ridley Boulevard, in the list of Section 37 benefits to be incorporated as part of the revised draft Zoning By-law and in the Section 37 agreement:
a. Bike racks, including:
i. Bicycle Room/Garbage Room
1. To be moved indoors (bicycle room).
2. Entrance way to garage on north side of the building to be renovated to include accessibility requirements.
3. Garage ceiling leak repairs not yet finalized.
b. Boulder in front of the building with the address 200 Ridley, including:
i. Appropriate signage for the neighborhood esthetic: that a large decorative stone of boulder with "200 Ridley Boulevard" address engraved on it, such as to be visible from the street, be incorporated into the landscaping at the front southwest corner of Building "A", and that the stone be lit with appropriate lighting.
ii. Accommodations for grading, drainage, appropriate landscaping cover materials of the proposed amenity area on the northeast side of the building to mitigate the impact heavy shading has on the soil and grass during spring and summer rainfalls (does not dry-muck).
iii. Rooftop amenity space and garden that has accessibility to sunshine currently being diminished as a result of the proposed development.
iv. Lamp posts be painted around the circular driveway.
v. Replace driveway.
vi. That the landscaping for those portions of the lands running from the southeast corner to the northeast corner closest to Building "A" be landscaped with some combination of wood chips, periwinkle or such other materials so as to reflect the heavily shaded nature of the area, which currently renders much of it unusable due to muddy conditions in the early fall through late spring.
vii. That the existing chain link fence on the easterly boundary of the property be replaced with a wooden fence so as to block the view of the Cricket Club storage area.
viii. That the sub clause 2 (k), Parking and Loading, contained in the Draft By-law and the Site Plan be amended to reflect the total parking supply of 78 spaces consisting of 69 spaces for residents and 9 for visitors as reflected in the fourth paragraph on page 4 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
c. New hallway carpets and under padding, including:
i. Installation of stainless steel flashing-like colour galvanized rubber or other appropriate high resistance material in high traffic areas to prevent damage from high use/contact -elevator sidings, lobby. This should be expanded to include laundry rooms, west side of building stairs and stairwells, garage entry way to lobby, corners, etc.
ii. The walls surrounding the stairwells to be repainted.
d. Additional large capacity washing machines in each laundry room, including:
i. Renovated laundry rooms on the first floor including adequate folding tables, wash basins, working exhaust fans, painting, floor refinished and polished, doors refinished and polished, incremental washers and dryers of equal or more capacity.
e. Amenities common to all suites, including
i. Improvement of ventilation in bathrooms and kitchens and the vents be cleaned out annually.
ii. Installation of new door sweeps on all balcony doors and entrance doors to all suites.
iii. Installation of new screen doors.
iv. Installation of electric exhaust fans in bathrooms and kitchens.
v. Free Wi- Fi and cable in all suites.
vi. At least 70 per cent of all suites remain affordable housing to protect the vulnerable tenants (seniors, persons with disabilities, and immigrant families).
vii. New Fridge and stove in each unit. These should match the existing decors.
viii. Development and amenity enhancements proposals will require enhanced maintenance contracts to support both direct and downstream impact as of result of amenity changes:
a. Outdoor care: the revised landscaping configuration and increased hard ground cover, BBQ cleaning and maintenance, shared access to parking not enforced, etc.
b. Indoor care – parking garage, garbage in interior, increased vehicular density, increased pedestrian traffic from north new parking.
ix. These should include adjustments to maintenance as follows:
1. Snow removal (not plowing) - less ground space for excess snow storing due to development. The current snow plow protocol places snow storage in locations where parking is now being proposed, where the proposed development will exist and illegally onto the city street.
2. Window washing at least twice per year on south side of building due to garage exhaust and north side of building due to car exhaust resulting from incremental parking.
3. Bi-monthly carpet washing.
4. Private parking enforcement with contact information provided to tenants and ticketing at tenant request.
5. Amenity space cleaning and maintenance- BBQ, equipment, garden.
6. Garage floor power washing.
7. Item (vii) applies to the above.
8. Replacement of the front door, including:
i. Security cameras at all exits (4) and garage with cable/wireless feed to tenant suites/TV.
ii. The doors to the garage and hallways be replaced.
iii. Lighting provided to and from the original building will be a priority at all times for everyone.
f. Artwork in the lobby commemorating the old 200 Ridley Boulevard building, including:
i. Improvements to the lobby including new furniture and paint. This should include seating area for 6-10 adults, artwork, amount and type of glass mirroring being proposed, etc., with a view to creating an esthetic appropriate to the neighbourhood and a corresponding level of privacy balanced with an ability to view the driveway entry. All objects should be secured in a corresponding esthetic manner.
ii. Lobby doors should be replaced with appropriate building code security doors- auto lock, emergency panic handles/bar, secure locking mechanism embedded in door frame.
g. Tenants to provide consultation on a construction mitigation plan, including:
i. The proposal should be amended to include overall timing of capital expenditures to be delivered prior to the start of the construction period.
ii. The proposal should be clear on no pass through costs to tenants for any of the changes including:
1. User fees for the amenity use (bicycle charges, use of rooms); and
2. Increased maintenance costs as a result.
iii. That a date or dates for completion of all intended improvements be reflected.
h. As members of the community, the tenants are requesting the landlord and developer be required to make donations to communal, spiritual and educational gathering spaces of the tenants and their families. The leaders of these spaces are to be able to use these at their sole discretion amenity enhancements as a result of the increased density being proposed as follows:
i. Armour Heights Community Centre Day and Evening Programs $25,000.
ii. Armour Heights Toronto Public Library $25,000 (A request has been made from the library on needed amenities and a response is pending.)
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. the following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. the securing of the rental tenure of the existing 91 unit building municipally known as 200 Ridley Boulevard for a minimum of 20 years, commencing from the date of Council’s decision, as a 90 unit building, with no applications for demolition, or conversion from residential rental use to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning and the City Solicitor, while allowing one unit to be converted to an indoor amenity space as detailed below;
ii. prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new development on the lot, a Section 111 permit will be filed for the elimination of one ground-floor residential rental unit in Building A as shown on Schedule RM4(27) to enable the construction of an indoor amenity space for the use and enjoyment of the tenants of the rental building; the location and finishing of which shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner. Subject to compliance with all applicable laws including the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17, construction and conversion of a ground-floor residential unit to indoor amenity space will be done no later than 3 years from the date of building permit issuance for the new building. Should a suitable unit not naturally vacate within 3 years, in the third year, tenants in the selected units will be offered relocation to the first available unit of the same type and at the same rent, or the equivalent of three months' rent for vacating, and in either case, a moving allowance of $1000 as well;
iii. that the owner provide for Building A two extra washing and drying machines for the use and enjoyment of the current and future tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
iv. that the owner upgrade the entrance to Building A with a new canopy, upgraded lighting, security cameras and improved accessibility to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
v. that the owner provide for the tenants of Building A a new bicycle storage area on the lot to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
vi. that the owner provide for the tenants of Building A upgraded landscaping, walkways, lighting and passive amenity spaces for the enjoyment of the tenants of that building to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
vii. that the owner provide, on the lot, an active recreation area primarily for the use of young children to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
viii. the design and materials of all improvements listed in a.i. to a.vii above will be secured via the site plan approval process and the costs of any such improvements as well as the costs of the development shall not be passed on in any form, including increases to the rents, to tenants of the existing rental building;
ix. prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the development, the owner shall provide, at its expense and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning a construction mitigation plan and tenant communication strategy for the development, and agrees to implement same;
x. the Owner shall provide reciprocal access to the owners and/or tenants of Building A and Building B over all outdoor landscaped open space areas at grade, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning. Such areas include: the landscaped open space to the east of Building B fronting on to Ridley Boulevard; and areas to the southeast, east and northeast of Building A. Such access shall continue to be provided notwithstanding the sites future division into two or more parcels or multiple ownerships.
xi. that the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning be authorized to enter into agreements on title to secure the above-listed improvements; and
xii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009. |
| Origin |
| (May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District |
| Summary |
The application proposes to amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 to redevelop the front portion of the site with a new 4-storey apartment building consisting of 30 residential dwelling units. A total of 40 parking spaces are proposed in an underground garage with 34 spaces dedicated for residents and 6 for visitors. There is an existing 91 unit 4-storey residential rental apartment building with 99 associated parking spaces located at the north end of the site. Parking for the existing building would be reconfigured for a total of 78 spaces consisting of 69 spaces for residents and 9 for visitors. A two-way driveway located along the western portion of the site will replace the existing circular driveway and will provide access to the existing apartment building and proposed apartment building.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the draft by-law attached to this report for a 4-storey apartment building. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 29, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 200 Ridley Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70957.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Michael Goldberg, Goldberg Group |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (May 28, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48391.pdf) (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.New.NY34.98.2) (June 8, 2014) E-mail from Rob Hong (NY.Main.NY34.98.3) (June 10, 2014) E-mail from Frank Turco (NY.Main.NY34.98.4) (June 13, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning (NY.Main.NY34.98.5) (June 13, 2014) E-mail from Rita DeLaurentis (NY.Main.NY34.98.6) (June 14, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Elliston (NY.Main.NY34.98.7) (June 16, 2014) Letter from Wm. J. Dolan, Wm. J. Dolan Planning Consultants Ltd. (NY.Main.NY34.98.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48388.pdf) (June 16, 2014) E-mail from Tiina Green (NY.Main.NY34.98.9) (June 17, 2014) E-mail from Denise Belanger (NY.Main.NY34.98.10) (June 17, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.11) (June 17, 2014) Submission from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.12) (June 23, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer Lamb (NY.Main.NY34.98.13) (June 24, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.14) (June 24, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning (NY.Main.NY34.98.15) (June 24, 2014) E-mail from Stephen Turvey (NY.Main.NY34.98.16) (June 25, 2014) E-mail from David Bounsall (NY.Main.NY34.98.17) (June 28, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.18) (June 29, 2014) E-mail from Mary DeLaurentis (NY.Main.NY34.98.19) (June 29, 2014) E-mail from Alan Slavner (NY.Main.NY34.98.20) (June 29, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Harry Vorps (NY.Main.NY34.98.21) (July 4, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.22) (July 4, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.23) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.24) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Janet Nestico (NY.New.NY34.98.25) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Anthony Nestico (NY.New.NY34.98.26) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.27) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Rita Delaurentis, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.28) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.29) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Bob Vorps, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.30) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Pam Yoannou, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.31) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.32) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Adam Tanel (NY.New.NY34.98.33) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Wm. J. Dolan, Wm. J. Dolan Planning Consultants Ltd. (NY.New.NY34.98.34) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49259.pdf) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Adam Tanel (NY.New.NY34.98.35) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone (CC.New.NY34.98.36)
(August 24, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Harry M. Vorps (CC.New.NY34.98.37) (August 25, 2014) Letter from Amber Stewart, Amber Stewart Law (CC.New.NY34.98.38) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49609.pdf) |
| Declared Interests (Community Council) |
| The following member(s) declared an interest: |
| 98a | Supplemental Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application 200 Ridley Boulevard |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North District |
| Summary |
On June 17, 2014, Community Council deferred consideration of the final staff report for the application at 200 Ridley Boulevard (dated May 29, 2014) to its meeting on August 12, 2014, and directed staff to meet with the tenants and applicants to build consensus on the Section 37 benefits and report back.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council the outcome of the meeting held on July 9, 2014, with the tenants of 200 Ridley Boulevard and the applicant which provided a revised list of Section 37 benefits.
This report recommends that the additional Section 37 benefits set out in this report be incorporated into the draft by-law permitting the development. The revised by-law is attached. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Supplemental Report, Attachment 1 and Appendix 1 from the Director, Community Planning, North District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 200 Ridley Boulevard
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72046.pdf) |
| NY34.99 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 134 Hanna Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 134 Hanna Road and to retain an outside planner and consultants, as necessary. |
| Origin |
| (July 25, 2014) Memo from Councillor Parker |
| Summary |
On June 25, 2014 the Committee of Adjustment denied the applicant's request for 8 variances relating to a proposal to redevelop the property at 134 Hanna Road.
The applicant has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 25, 2014) Memo from Councillor Parker on Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 134 Hanna Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72730.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 134 Hanna Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72731.pdf) |
| NY34.101 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Parking Prohibition on Willowdale Avenue |
| Bill 945 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of no parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Elmwood Avenue and Hollywood Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Filion |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Willowdale Avenue, City Council approval of this item is required.
The purpose of this motion is to obtain approval to prohibit parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. Residents have indicated concern that vehicles parked on the east side of Willowdale Avenue, north of Hollywood Avenue, create a sight obstruction for motorists exiting Hollywood Avenue.
Currently, parking is permitted for maximum periods of three hours on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. Parking is prohibited on the west side of Wilowdale Avenue from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, between Sheppard Avenue East and Parkview Avenue.
The installation of no parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Parkview Avenue would improve access to the bus stop for TTC busses as well as improve the visibility of motorists exiting Hollywood Avenue.
It should be noted that all costs associated with the amendments to the parking regulations are included within the Transportation Services' 2014 Operating Budget. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale on Parking Prohibition on Willowdale Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72733.pdf) |
| NY34.102 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:26 |
| No Right Turn on Red - Millwood Road and McRae Drive |
| Bill 946 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve a northbound right turn on red signal prohibition from McRae Drive to Millwood Road in effect at all times.
2. City Council approve a southbound right turn on red signal prohibition from McRae Drive to Millwood Road in effect at all times.
3. City Council approve a westbound right turn on red signal prohibition from Millwood Road to McRae Drive in effect at all times.
4. City Council approve an eastbound right turn on red signal prohibition from Millwood Road to McRae Drive in effect at all times. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Parker |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Millwood Road and McRae Drive, City Council approval of this motion is required.
The purpose of this motion is to obtain approval to address certain local concerns with regard to the safe operation at the intersection of Millwood Road and McRae Drive.
Millwood Road and McRae Drive are collector roads that intersect in the heart of the Leaside Community. The intersection is controlled by traffic control signals. Municipal sidewalks are located on both sides of each road. Transit service is provided on both Millwood Road and McRae Drive.
In the general vicinity of the Millwood Road/McRae Drive intersection are a number of residential dwellings, a church, and a park/community centre/children's playground/library. The nature of the area attracts a large number of children and families. Numerous children cross at least one of the roadways at the intersection on their way to and from school.
Therefore, in order to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety at the intersection of Millwood Road and McRae Drive, and to help address the other concerns described above, it is recommended that City Council adopt the following recommendations. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor John Parker Ward 26 - Don Valley West on No Right Turn on Red at Millwood Road and McRae Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72755.pdf) |
| NY34.107 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the City Planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Filion |
| Summary |
Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Hesam Bahman-Bijari, to permit the severance of the subject properties into three residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.
In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the applications be refused on the grounds that "the subjects lots in their current form maintain and reinforce the stability and character of the neighbourhood and approval of a severance on a lot this size could risk weakening the character of the neighbourhood".
On July 9th, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the consent applications on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
John Alati, on behalf of Hesam Bahman-Bijari, has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72769.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72770.pdf) Attachment 2 - A copy of Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72771.pdf) Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice - Consent Application - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72772.pdf) Attachment 4 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72773.pdf) Attachment 5 - A copy of an email from Planning staff to Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72774.pdf) Attachment 6 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72775.pdf) |
| NY34.108 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 16 Elynhill Drive |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the City Planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the minor variances for 16 Elynhill Drive. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Filion |
| Summary |
Application for Minor Variance was submitted by Sanju Mehta, on behalf of Sanju Mehta and Sharon Harrietha, to permit the construction of a new three-storey dwelling on the subject lot.
In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the variance to permit a 3-storey dwelling be refused, on the grounds that it was not in keeping with the existing neighbourhood character. They also recommended that the proposed finished first floor height and the proposed area of the rear second storey balcony be reduced, in order to be more in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood.
On July 9th, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the requested variances on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
Sanju Mehta has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 16 Elynhill Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72778.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 16 Elynhill Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72779.pdf) Attachment 2 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 16 Elynhill Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72780.pdf) Attachment 3 - A copy of an email from Planning staff to Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72781.pdf) Attachment 4 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 16 Elynhill Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72782.pdf) |
| NY34.109 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 144 Kingsdale Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 144 Kingsdale Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Filion |
| Summary |
Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Xiuhua Guo, to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.
Severance of this lot had been sought previously in June 2005, and was refused by the Committee of Adjustment. It was then approved upon appeal by the Ontario Municipal Board in January 2006. However, this decision has since expired.
On June 25th, 2014, the Committee refused the consent application on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
In addition to creating two undersized lots, the application also requested a number of variances. This included reduced side yard setbacks and increased lot coverage, building height, finished first floor and main wall height. Changes to some of these variances were submitted to the Committee; however, as all the associated variances were refused, those changes are not binding.
Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Xiuhua Guo, has appealed the decision of the Committee to the Ontario Municipal Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| Memo from CouncillorJohn Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 144 Kingsdale Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72784.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Consent Application - 144 Kingsdale Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72785.pdf) Attachment 2 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Consent Application - 144 Kingsdale Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72786.pdf) Attachment 3 - A copy of Memo from CouncillorJohn Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72787.pdf) Attachment 4 - A copy of Decision from Ontario Municipal Board (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72788.pdf) Attachment 5 - An Extract of the Committee of Adjustment Agenda Listing (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72789.pdf) Attachment 6 - Maps and Plans (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72790.pdf) Attachment 7 - A copy of an email from Planning staff (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72791.pdf) Attachment 8 - A copy of an email from Planning staff (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72792.pdf) Attachment 9 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 144 Kingsdale Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72793.pdf) |
| NY34.110 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 252 Haddington Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff, or if necessary, retain outside planners and experts to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Consent and Minor Variances for 252 Haddington Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz |
| Summary |
On June 25, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the above application for consent to sever a parcel of residential lands into two parts for conveyance purposes for the creation of two new undersized building lots and the minor variance applications to build a new dwelling with integral garage on each of the undersized lots.
Staff recommended that should the Committee approve the application for Consent that is be subject to the conditions as set out in the report. With respect to the Minor Variances, staff recommended that the proposed lot coverage and building heights be reduced to be more in keeping with the intent of the zoning by-law and Official Plan and further recommended that the height of all side exterior main walls facing a side lot line be reduced with respect with the application A299/14NY to be more in keeping with the intent of the zoning by-law and Official Plan.
The Committee of Adjustment refused the consent application on the following grounds:
- The proposed land division does not confirm to the policies of the Official Plan - The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated - The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated - The variance/s are not minor - The proposal/s are not minor
On July 14, 2014, the applicant appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz on Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 252 Haddington Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72794.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Minor Variance and Consent Apllications - 252 Haddington Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72795.pdf) Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 252 Haddington Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72796.pdf) |
| NY34.111 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 176 and 178 Caribou Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff, or if necessary, retain outside planners and experts to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's Refusal of the Consent and Minor Variances for 176 and 178 Caribou Road. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz |
| Summary |
On June 25, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the above application for consent to sever a parcel of residential lands into three parts for conveyance purposes for the creation of three new undersized building lots and the minor variance applications to build three 3-storey dwellings with 2-car integral garages on each of the newly created lots related to 176 and 178 Caribou Road.
Staff recommended that the proposed Consent and associated Variance applications be refused.
The Committee of Adjustment refused the consent application on the following grounds:
- The proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan. - The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated. - The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated.
And the three minor variance applications for:
- The variance(s) are not minor; - The proposal(s) are not appropriate to the land and buildings in the area; - The proposal(s) do not maintain the general intent of Zoning Code and By-laws; - The proposal(s) do not maintain the general intent of the Official Plan.
On July 14, 2014, the applicant appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Karen Stintz Ward 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence on Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 176 and 178 Caribou Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72797.pdf) Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 176 and 178 Caribou Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72872.pdf) Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 176 and 178 Caribou Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72873.pdf) |
| NY34.112 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:34 |
| Changes to On-Street Parking times on Railside Road |
| Bill 922 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the proposed changes for parking allowed on Railside Road to a maximum of three hours daily after 5:00 p.m. in the current permitted area. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Minnan-Wong |
| Summary |
Concern was expressed to my office about the one hour on-street parking restriction on sections of Railside Road. Enforcement of the one hour parking regulation has led the patrons of the business at 74 Railside Road to park illegally in neighbouring commercial lots. Businesses have expressed concerns with this situation and suggested a change be made to the on-street parking times.
A letter was circulated from my office for input from local businesses on the proposed changes to the existing parking restrictions. The results suggested the one hour time limit be amended to three hours daily after 5:00 p.m.
Currently, parking is allowed for one hour on the west, south and east sides of Railside Road between Lawrence Avenue East (west intersection) and a point 568 metres south of Lawrence Avenue (east intersection). As well, the East side of Railside Road allows one hour parking between Lawrence Avenue East (east intersection) and a point 490 meters south. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong Ward 34 - Don Valley East on Changes to On-Street Parking times on Railside Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72757.pdf) |
| NY34.113 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Proposed Amendment to City Council Resolution CC50.5 - Settlement - 51 Drewry Avenue and 8-28 Inez Court |
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY34.113a with recommendations) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council.
1. Requested the City Solicitor to report directly to the next meeting of City Council on August 25, 2014, regarding the revised settlement proposal as per the letter (August 6, 2014) from Yolanda Flanders' Development Consultant, to Councillor Filion. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Filion |
| Summary |
On April 1, 2014, City Council endorsed Yolanda Flanders' settlement proposal, dated 20 March 2014, with respect to its development application at 51 Drewry Avenue and 8-28 Inez Court. Under the terms of the settlement, Yolanda Flanders is to withdraw its OMB Appeals (File Nos. PL111252 and PL111240) before submitting a revised zoning application substantively consistent with the site plan and project statistics attached to the settlement report dated March 25, 2014.
"Option B" was the option that was most preferred by local residents, in preference to the original site plan (Option A), and Option B is also the preferred option of the local Ward Councillor. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale on a Proposed Amendment to City Council Resolution CC50.5 on the Settlement for 51 Drewry Avenue and 8-28 Inez Court
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72758.pdf) Attachment 1 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - Letter dated August 6, 2014 from Yolanda Flanders' Development Consultant to Councillor John Filion (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72759.pdf) Attachment 2 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - City Council Resolution CC50.5 from City Council Meeting on April 1, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72760.pdf) Attachment 3 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - Report dated March 25, 2014 from the City Solicitor on 51 Drewry Avenue, 8-28 Inez Court - OMB Hearing Proposed Settlement and Request for Direction (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72761.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 25, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 51 Drewry Avenue, 8-28 Inez Court - Revised Site Plan Settlement Proposal (NY34.113a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73110.pdf) |
| NY34.115 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Installation of Traffic Control Signals - Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Shiner |
| Summary |
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Willowdale Avenue, City Council approval is required for the installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue.
The installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue would address concerns that at present there is no protection for pedestrians crossing at this location. Transportation Services staff advised that the installation of a pedestrian crossing at this location may not create a safe environment with turning vehicles and that a traffic control signal would be the better option to improve safety.
Willowdale Avenue is a four lane minor arterial road. The nearest protected crossing areas are at Otonabee Avenue located 325 metres to the north and at Cummer Avenue located 500 metres to the south. There are transit stops on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue.
The installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue would improve the pedestrian environment for residents on both sides of the residential communities adjacent to Willowdale Avenue.
Your support for this request from neighbourhood residents would be appreciated. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor David Shiner Ward 24 - Willowdale on the Installation of Traffic Control Signals at Willowdale Avenue and Centre Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72763.pdf) |
| NY34.116 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Staff Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board for 784 Sheppard Avenue East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. Should the applicant appeal the refusal of Committee of Adjustment application A445/14NY for 784 Sheppard Avenue East, that City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to indicate that the City has no objection to the requested variances as they implement the plans which were approved by City Council under application 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Member Motion from Councillor Shiner |
| Summary |
The applicant filed an application to amend Zoning By-law 7625 (file 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ) for a two-storey retail building and fifty stacked townhouse units. City Council approved the application and Site Specific By-law 144-2014 was enacted. No appeals were filed.
During a review of the applicant's building permit application, variances were identified. The applicant filed a minor variance application (file A445/14NY) to seek zoning compliance however the Committee of Adjustment refused the application. The plans submitted to the Committee of Adjustment implement the development considered and approved by City Council under application 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor David Shiner Ward 24 - Willowdale requesting Staff Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board for 784 Sheppard Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72830.pdf) |
| NY34.117 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Review Study |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner, to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to undertake a Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Study Review. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Shiner |
| Summary |
Congestion along Sheppard Ave. East has been identified as a major concern by residents along the corridor. The intersections of Leslie Street and Sheppard Ave. East, Bayveiw Avenue and Sheppard Ave. East, and Yonge St. and Sheppard Ave. East have all been identified as some of the most congested intersections in Toronto. To address these concerns, a study has been requested to identify current transportation constraints and issues and identify future transportation conditions issues under future redevelopment.
The main goal of this Study is to review the transportation efficiency and available capacity in the context of approved development in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan area.
Given the multiple magnitude of transportation concerns under existing conditions along the Sheppard Avenue Corridor, the study will undertake objective technical analyses that addresses both demand and operational considerations from multimodal capacity and connectivity.
Section 37 and 45 funds received for future traffic monitoring are available for this study, and if necessary, the balance of funding is to be considered through the budget process.
The limit of the study area will be Sheppard Avenue East, from Yonge Street to Don Mills Road. A briefing note with further detail is also is attached for your consideration.
Your support for this request would be appreciated. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor David Shiner Ward 24 - Willowdale on a Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Review Study
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72808.pdf) Attachment 1 - Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Review Study (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72829.pdf) |
| NY34.121 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:10 |
| Rental Housing Demolition Application - 847-873 Sheppard Avenue West |
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY34.121a for information) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
North York Community Council:
1. Requested City Planning staff to report directly to City Council for its next meeting on August 25, 2014 on the Rental Housing Demolition Application for 847-873 Sheppard Avenue West.
|
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor Pasternak |
| Summary |
The applicant has obtained approval for a mixed-use development from the OMB in a decision dated October 12, 2012. The applicant has applied for approval of an application for rental housing demolition and has agreed to provide seven (7) rental replacement units as recommended by City staff.
The applicant is prepared to enter into a Section 37 agreement with the City of Toronto for the OMB approved development and guarantee that such development would include the provision of seven (7) rental replacement units. The properties are currently experiencing a rodent infestation problem and area residents are fearful that they are a fire hazard. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Memo from Councillor James Pasternak Ward 10 - York Centre on a Rental Housing Demolition Application for 847-873 Sheppard Avenue West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72835.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 25, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 847 - 873 Sheppard Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications (NY34.121a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73136.pdf) |
| Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 34 |
| SC34.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:37 |
| 15 Tordale Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the permit to remove the privately owned Colorado spruce tree at 15 Tordale Crescent. |
| Origin |
| (May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council deny the permit for an application to remove one (1) privately owned tree. The owner has requested tree removal due to concerns with the tree interfering with the electrical service line coming into the house and roots damaging the driveway.
The subject tree is a Colorado spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 39 cm in diameter, located at the front of the property. This tree is in fair to good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 27, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 15 Tordale Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70863.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Michel Lachance |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Petition from Michel Lachance with 24 area residents signatures for removal of the tree, submitted by Councillor Thompson (SC.New.SC34.3.1)
|
| SC34.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:36 |
| Assumption of Services - 216 and 220 Scarborough Golf Club Road - Mainbram Scarborough Developments Inc. - Registered Plan 66M-2481 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council assume the services installed pursuant to Section 1(b) of Schedule "B" to the Subdivision Agreement registered as Instrument No. AT2524602 at 216 and 220 Scarborough Golf Club Road.
2. City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this development.
3. City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the municipal services with respect to the development at 216 and 220 Scarborough Golf Club Road. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services -216 and 220 Scarborough Golf Club Road - Mainbram Scarborough Developments Inc. -Registered Plan 66M-2481
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71518.pdf) |
| SC34.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:35 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 41-69 Lebovic Avenue |
| Bill 902 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below be designated as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 41-69 Lebovic Avenue.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (June 5, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 5, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 41-69 Lebovic Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70494.pdf) Attachment 1 - Draft By-law to amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, as amended - 41-69 Lebovic Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70495.pdf) |
| SC34.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:34, 37 |
| Lane Designation - Victoria Park Avenue at Jonesville Crescent |
| Bill 935 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate the westerly southbound lane on Victoria Park Avenue between Jonesville Crescent and a point 110 metres north for southbound right turns only. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This staff report is to by-law a southbound one way traffic lane regulation on Victoria Park Avenue at Jonesville Crescent.
The purpose of this report is to enact a regulation for the existing southbound right turn lane. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Lane Designation - Victoria Park Avenue at Jonesville Crescent
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71641.pdf) Location Plan - Victoria Park Avenue at Jonesville Crescent (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71642.pdf) |
| SC34.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:34, 37 |
| No Stopping Zone - Victoria Park Avenue from Lawrence Avenue East to Deanvar Avenue |
| Bill 934 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit stopping at anytime on both sides of Victoria Park Avenue from Lawrence Avenue East to Deanvar Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to advise on the feasibility of preventing trucks from stopping and loading on both sides of Victoria Park Avenue. The request originated from the car dealership located at 1900 Victoria Park Avenue between Deanvar Avenue and Lawrence Avenue East. There is currently only a no parking zone on both sides of the roadway. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - No Stopping Zone - Victoria Park Avenue from Lawrence Avenue East to Deanvar Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71660.pdf) Location Plan - Victoria Park Avenue from Lawrence Avenue East to Deanvar Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71661.pdf) |
| SC34.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:42 |
| Pedestrian Crossing Protection Follow-up - McLevin Avenue and Malvern Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council not approve the installation of Traffic Control Signals at the intersection of McLevin Avenue and Malvern Street at this time. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
Traffic studies reveal that all warrants for pedestrian crossing protection, specifically, traffic control signals, pedestrian crossover or a pedestrian refuge island are not warranted at this location at this time, including on Fridays. As a result, traffic control signals should not be installed since they are not warranted. Similarly, neither a pedestrian cross over nor island are feasible. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Pedestrian Crossing Protection Follow-up - McLevin Avenue and Malvern Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71689.pdf) Location Plan - McLevin Avenue and Malvern Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71690.pdf) |
| SC34.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:42 |
| Traffic Control Signals - Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of Traffic Control Signals at the intersection of Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road.
2. City Council approve the removal of the Pedestrian Crossover at Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at this intersection. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This report responds to a petition by area residents, requesting a study to replace the existing Pedestrian Crossover (PXO), located on the west side of the intersection, with Traffic Control Signals (TCS) at the intersection of Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road.
Earlier traffic studies, including vehicle speed and volume counts were conducted on Thursday, October 10, 2013, which revealed that justification for Traffic Control Signals was not met.
After more recent studies which revealed higher operating speeds, the existing PXO is no longer a suitable traffic control device and should be replaced by Traffic Control Signals, as the more suitable form of traffic control device at this time. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Traffic Control Signals - Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71877.pdf) Location Plan - Milner Avenue and Scunthorpe Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71878.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Taras Rohatyn |
| SC34.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:43 |
| Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-laws, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement, 201 Guildwood Parkway, the Guild Inn |
| Bill 983 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 201 Guildwood Parkway, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the adaptive reuse of the Guild Inn as a restaurant, banquet hall, and conference and event centre substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated April 25, 2014, and revised June 17, 2014, prepared by Queen's Quay Architects International Inc., date-stamped received by City Planning on June 20, 2014, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Philip Goldsmith Architect, dated June 19, 2014, date-stamped received by City Planning on June 23, 2014, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:
a. Prior to Site Plan Approval the applicant shall:
i. Complete all pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control.
b. Prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 201 Guildwood Parkway, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the applicant shall:
i. Have executed and registered a Site Plan Agreement for the development to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate.
ii. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property 201 Guildwood Parkway to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor including registration of such amending agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
iii. Provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the properties located at 201 Guildwood Parkway, dated June 19, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iv. Provide an Interpretation Strategy for 201 Guildwood Parkway to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
v. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
vi. Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, and showing the preservation of the central third floor dormer on the south elevation, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
vii. Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the Guild Inn will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
viii. Provide an Interpretation Plan for 201 Guildwood Parkway, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ix. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and the approved Interpretation Plan.
c. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the applicant shall:
i. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate, to enter into a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 201 Guildwood Parkway in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and City Solicitor.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a heritage easement agreement for the property at 201 Guildwood Parkway.
4. City Council state its intention to repeal former City of Scarborough By-law No. 19126 and to amend City of Toronto By-law No. 266-1999 by adding the Osterhaut Cabin currently designated under By-law 19126 and identified as 191 Guildwood Parkway to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the Statement of Significance included as Amended Attachment No. 8 to the report (July 27, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and describe its heritage attributes.
5. If there are no objections to the proposed repeal or amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council repeal and amending the designating by-laws.
6. If there are objections to the proposed repeal or amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repeal or amendment to the Conservation Review Board.
7. If the proposed repeal or amendment are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to amend the designation by-law and repeal By-law 19126. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Councillor Ainslie submitted an Amended Revised Attachment No. 8 to the report (June 27, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division which is referred to in Recommendation 4 of the Scarborough Community Council. |
| Origin |
| (June 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described for the property located at 201 Guildwood Parkway, the Guild Inn, to allow for its adaptive reuse as a restaurant, banquet hall, and conference and event centre.
At its meeting of April 1, 2 and 3, 2014, Council authorized staff to enter into a Letter of Intent (LOI) to allow for, among other matters, the sublease of a portion of Guildwood Park for the purpose of this development. As the Guild Inn is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, and as the applicant is proposing to alter this property’s heritage attributes, Council approval for the proposal is required under Section 33 of the Act.
Should Council endorse the proposed conservation strategy, staff recommend that Council require that the applicant enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to secure the long term protection of the property, and that staff be authorized to take the necessary steps to enter into such Agreement. Staff also recommend that existing heritage by-laws for this property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act be updated. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-laws, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement, 201 Guildwood Parkway, the Guild Inn
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71207.pdf) Attachment 1 - Location Plan - 201 Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71208.pdf) Attachment 2 - Photographs - 201 Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71209.pdf) Attachment 3 - Proposal, Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71222.pdf) Attachment 4 - Development Principles, Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71223.pdf) Attachment 5 - Reasons for Designation, Osterhaut Cabin, Former Borough of Scarborough By-law 1126 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71224.pdf) Attachment 6 - Reasons for Designation, 201 Guildwood Parkway, City of Toronto By-law 266-1999 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71225.pdf) Attachment 7 - Amended Reasons for Designation, Building 191 and Sculpture Studio (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71227.pdf) Attachment 8 - Amended Revised Reasons for Designation (Statement of Significance, 2014) Heritage Property Research and Evaluation Report 201 Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71228.pdf) Attachment 9 - Heritage Property Research and Evaluation Report 201 Guildwood Parkway (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71229.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Miroslav Glavic |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Rick Schofield, Chairman, Scarborough Community Preservation Committee (SC.New.SC34.19.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Rick Schofield, Chairman, Scarborough Community Preservation Committee (SC.New.SC34.19.2) |
| 19a | Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-laws, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement, 201 Guildwood Parkway, the Guild Inn |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
Forwarding the recommendations of the Toronto Preservation Board at its meeting on July 17, 2014. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-laws, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement, 201 Guildwood Parkway, the Guild Inn
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71771.pdf) |
| SC34.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:37 |
| Ellesmere Employment Study - Update Report |
| Bill 964 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Interim Control By-law No. 1431-2013 to extend the period of interim control to May 14, 2015 for the lands in the Ellesmere Employment Study area, substantially in accordance with the proposed By-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the By-law as may be required. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
Staff are conducting a City-initiated planning study of employment lands adjacent to Ellesmere Road and Canadian Road, between Warden Avenue and Birchmount Road, referred to as the Ellesmere Employment Study (the "Study"). The Study is reviewing compatibility of land uses which are currently permitted in the Study Area, shown outlined on the schedule below. The Study is also assessing consistency of existing use permissions in the Study Area with Provincial Policies, the City's Official Plan Employment Policies, and the City's consolidated Zoning By-law 569-2013. In addition, the Study includes a detailed consideration of planning and permit issues associated with recycling and recovery uses, permission for which in the Study Area has been temporarily suspended through the enactment of Interim Control By-law ("ICBL") 1431-2013 on November 13, 2013 (under appeal).
Considerable research and analysis has been conducted to date, as well as public, area business and stakeholder consultations. A summary of the work completed to date is set out Attachment 2 to this report, the "Ellesmere Employment Study Update Report – July 2014". The purpose of this update report is to inform Council as well as interested stakeholders on the progress of the Study, and to recommend an extension of the ICBL for a six month period, to enable completion of the Study. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Ellesmere Employment Study - Update Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71939.pdf) Attachment 2 - Ellesmere Employment Study Update Report - July 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72287.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Professional Corporation, Davies Howe Partners, LLP (SC.New.SC34.20.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-48828.pdf) |
| SC34.21 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:36 |
| 357 Birchmount Road - Zoning Application - Request for Direction Report and Information Report |
| Communications SC34.21.10 to SC34.21.14 have been submitted on this Item |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the staff recommendations for the property at the north-east corner of Birchmount Road and Highview Avenue (known as 357 Birchmount Road) as further detailed in the report dated July 14, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council support the draft Zoning By-law Amendment contained in Attachments 7 and 8 to the report (July 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue to work with the applicant on the final form of the draft Zoning By-law Amendments to be presented at the Ontario Municipal Board.
4. City Council receive the public report and confidential information in Attachment 1 of the report (July 22, 2014) from the City Solicitor.
5. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 of the report (July 22, 2014) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc. has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. The application seeks to amend the zoning by-law to permit the development of eight (8) semi-detached dwellings and one single detached dwelling on the lands located at the north-east corner of Birchmount Road and Highview Avenue, known as 357 Birchmount Road.
The purpose of this report is twofold, first to seek City Council's direction with respect to the position of the City at the Municipal Board hearing, for which a hearing date has not yet been scheduled; and secondly, to respond to Scarborough Community Council's May 13, 2014 referral motion on the Final Report for Zoning By-law Amendment application 13 203636 ESC 36 OZ which directed that the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District consider all potential options related to the best use of this site including, but not limited to, a possible land exchange. Refer to the separate but related confidential report from Legal Services on the August 12, 2014 Scarborough Community Council agenda.
It is staff's position that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is appropriate. Staff are recommending that the application be supported, subject to the conditions in the Recommendations Section of this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 357 Birchmount Road - Zoning Application - Request for Direction Report and Information Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71703.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Ene Underwood, Habitat for Humanity Greater Toronto Area |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Anna Drzewiecka (SC.New.SC34.21.1)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from S.G. Mason (SC.New.SC34.21.2) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Agnes and William Milne (SC.New.SC34.21.3) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Patricia and Fred Owen (SC.New.SC34.21.4) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Tara and Rob Terry (SC.New.SC34.21.5) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Jennifer Green and Michael Morris (SC.New.SC34.21.6) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Steven Mark (SC.New.SC34.21.7) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Freddie DeFreitas, Gloria DeFreitas and Fred DeFreitas Sr. (SC.New.SC34.21.8) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Barbara M. Hobbs (SC.New.SC34.21.9) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 13, 2014) Letter from Paul and Tanya Skinner (CC.Main.SC34.21.10)
(August 22, 2014) Submission from S. G. Mason (CC.Supp.SC34.21.11) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Nancy Martin (CC.New.SC 34.21.12) (August 22, 2014) Letter from The Terrys (CC.New.SC34.21.13) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Sue Mason (CC.New.SC34.21.14) (August 25, 2014) Petition from Councillor Gary Crawford, Ward 36, Scarborough, containing the names of approximately 384 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New) |
| 21a | 357 Birchmount Road - Information Report Regarding Expropriation of the Subject Property |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Summary |
Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc. has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. The application seeks to amend the zoning by-law to permit the development of eight (8) semi-detached dwellings and one single detached dwelling on the lands located at the north-east corner of Birchmount Road and Highview Avenue, known as 357 Birchmount Road.
The purpose of this report is to respond to Scarborough Community Council's May 13, 2014 referral motion on the Final Report for Zoning By-law Amendment application 13 203636 ESC 36 OZ which directed that the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District consider all potential options related to the best use of this site.
This report will outline the process of land expropriation and provides legal advice. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor - 357 Birchmount Road - Information Report Regarding Expropriation of the Subject Property
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71812.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information on 357 Birchmount Road |
| SC34.23 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:41 |
| 4181 Sheppard Avenue East - Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council determine that an Avenue Segment Study is not required given these lands at 4181 Sheppard Avenue East were recently examined as part of an Avenue Segment Study submitted in support of a development application at 23 Glen Watford Drive. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Directed Planning staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 4181 Sheppard Avenue East together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Directed Planning staff to give Notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 500 metres of the site and, further, directed that the additional costs for Notice beyond the 120 metres from the subject site be borne by the Applicant.
3. Directed City Clerk's staff to give Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
These applications propose to subdivide the lands to create eight development blocks, future park and/or open space blocks and public roads and lanes. Six of the proposed development blocks are for townhouse purposes (86 units) and one is for a semi-detached dwelling. One block on the south side of Sheppard Avenue East is for future mixed-use development. All proposed dwelling units are 4 storeys in height and have integrated garages. A range of townhouse dwelling types are proposed.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
Planning staff have significant concerns with the development proposal and do not support it in its current form. The townhouse proposal does not adequately reflect the City Council endorsed Infill Townhouse Guidelines or Development Infrastructure Policy and Standards (DIPS). In addition, an Official Plan amendment and required plans, studies and reports have not been filed to support the proposed level of intensification proposed on the entire site.
The applications should proceed through the standard planning review process, including the scheduling of a community meeting. A final report will be prepared and a public meeting scheduled once all identified issues have been satisfactorily resolved and all required information is provided.
Staff are prepared to continue working with the applicants to arrive at a suitable development, however, many of the concerns first raised by Planning staff remain unaddressed. Planning staff will prepare a Refusal Report if these matters are not appropriately addressed by the end of the second quarter of 2015. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 4181 Sheppard Avenue East - Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72004.pdf) |
| SC34.26 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:42 |
| 365 Staines Road and 1 - 23, 25, 27, 29, 31 and 33 Twinflower Court - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report |
| Bill 915 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 365 Staines Road and 1–23, 25, 27, 29, 31 and 33 Twinflower Court, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to report dated July 14, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
2. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By‑law.
3. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By‑law on title.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By‑law as may be required. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This application seeks exemption from part lot control to enable the creation of 28 separate conveyable parcels, and maintenance easements, for a development comprised of 28 townhouse units. The subject lands are located at 365 Staines Road and 1–23, 25, 27, 29, 31 and 33 Twinflower Court.
The issues regarding the proposed development were addressed through the approval of the associated rezoning and draft plan of subdivision. The lifting of part lot control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of the lands.
This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 365 Staines Road and 1 - 23, 25, 27, 29, 31 and 33 Twinflower Court - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71474.pdf) |
| SC34.27 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 |
| Various Properties - City-initiated Technical Amendments to Various Community Zoning By-laws - Final Report |
| Bills 998 and 999 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Zoning By-laws for the affected communities/employment districts substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law amendments attached as Attachment Nos. 1 and 2 to the report (July 11, 2014) from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This report reviews and recommends approval of amendments to various community and employment district Zoning By-laws to clarify and implement the approved intentions of City Council and to rectify minor technical errors in the By-laws. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Various Properties - City-initiated Technical Amendments to Various Community Zoning By-laws - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71635.pdf) Notice of Public Meeting - Various Properties - City-initiated Technical Amendments to Various Community Zoning By-laws (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72314.pdf) |
| SC34.28 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:35 |
| 2 to 28 Coventry Street (formerly known as 27 Leyton Avenue) - Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - Final Report |
| Bill 910 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 2 to 28 Coventry Street, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration.
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 2 to 28 Coventry Street as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to this report (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
The Common Elements Condominium application proposes to establish a driveway, walkways, visitor parking spaces and landscaping as common elements at the recently constructed residential development at 2 to 28 Coventry Street. The application is required to provide legal access to eight semi-detached dwelling units and six townhouse dwelling units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the common elements by the condominium corporation.
The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the 14 dwelling units.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2 to 28 Coventry Street (formerly known as 27 Leyton Avenue) - Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71453.pdf) Notice of Public Meeting - 2-28 Coventry Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71487.pdf) |
| SC34.29 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:36 |
| 2955 Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report |
| Bills 1010 and 1011 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Scarborough Cliffcrest Community Zoning By-law No. 9396, as amended, for the lands at 2955 Kingston Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to report (July 15, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 2955 Kingston Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report (July 15, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to re-zone the lands to permit the existing dental office to remain within the 2-storey converted dwelling for the property at 2955 Kingston Road.
The dental office currently occupying the property was permitted through a minor variance application approved at the Ontario Municipal Board in 2008 (Application No. A237/07SC). The use was approved for an interim period of 5 years ending on July 8, 2013. The applicant is now proposing to amend the Zoning By-law to permit office uses on the property, which would allow the dental office to remain permanently.
The proposal conforms to the City's Official Plan and the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. It is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. The dental office use is located on the ground floor of a converted 2-storey dwelling, making it appropriate and compatible both in the context of the Kingston Road corridor and the nearby low-rise neighbourhood.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2955 Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71521.pdf) Notice of Public Meeting - 2955 Kingston Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71522.pdf) |
| SC34.30 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:38 |
| 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road - Zoning Amendment - Final Report |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Eglinton Community Zoning By-law No. 10048, for the lands at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report dated July 29, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to amending section 449 to read:
"449. Vehicle parking spaces shall be provided on Parcel B as shown on Schedule A (Schedule 1 of this By-law), as follows:
i) A minimum of 0.64 resident parking spaces for each dwelling unit for buildings located on Parcel B as shown on Schedule 'A' (Schedule '1' of this By- law); and
ii) A minimum of 0.12 visitor parking spaces for each dwelling unit for buildings located on Parcel B as shown on Schedule 'A' (Schedule '1' of this By- law)."
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, as amended, as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in exchange for the increase in density are as follows:
A total of $450,000.00 as follows:
• $100,000 for improvements to Bendale Library (including decorative fencing around the reading garden and computer upgrades for library users);
• $100,000 for improvements to the 45 Trudelle Street Park/ Piazza;
• $100,000 for improvements to playground and community facilities at 400 McCowan Road TCHC project/ Cliffcrest Community Centre; and
• $150,000 for Knob Hill Park/Bendale Library/McCowan Park improvements.
The above noted $450,000.00 is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the building on Parcel B and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the registration of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.
b. The following improvements and amenities will also be secured as community benefits in the Section 37 Agreement, with no cost pass-through to residents of the existing buildings, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning and the City Solicitor:
1. the owner of the existing 566 unit residential rental buildings, known as 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road, shall agree to secure the tenure of all existing units as well as the proposed new 12 units in the three existing rental buildings as rental housing, with no applications for demolition or conversion of the existing and proposed rental units to a non-rental purpose for a period of 20 years commencing from the date of Council's decision;
2. the owner, prior to the first above grade building permit on Parcel B, will provide approximately 149 square metre (1,604 square foot) of multi-purpose amenity space to be provided within the building at 1340 Danforth Road, on the ground floor (at grade-level). The applicant will provide furnishings and finishes appropriate to its use, including washroom facilities for the use and enjoyment of all residents of the rental buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road;
3. the owner will provide for the use and enjoyment of all residents of the rental buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road, prior to the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B, an amenity space of at least 61 square metre (656 square foot) in the building at 1360 Danforth Road with furnishings and finishes appropriate to its use;
4. the owner will continue to provide and maintain an amenity space of 224 square metres (2,411 square feet) within the building at 1350 Danforth Road, and now occupied by the swimming pool and change rooms, for the use and enjoyment of all residents of the rental buildings at 1340, 1350, and 1360 Danforth Road with furnishings and finishes appropriate to its use;
5. the owner shall ensure that the amenity space mentioned in 3 (b) 2, 3 and 4) above will continue to be used for amenity purposes without the loss of existing rental units or related services or facilities in a location agreeable to the Chief Planner, with the provisions of the attached zoning by-law, with no application to be made by the owner or subsequent owner to amend the amenity space provisions of the Zoning By-law for at least 20 years, without the consent of the Chief Planner;
6. the owner will provide for the enhancement of each laundry room in the buildings existing on Parcel A at the time of Council's decision, appropriate seating, tables, clothing racks, security cameras, and painting and furnishings and finishes appropriate for its use, to be provided prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the new building on Parcel B;
7. the provision and maintenance of a play area for the causal, everyday use and enjoyment of all the residents and occupants of the four buildings, not later than the occupancy of the new building on Parcel B, to be not less than 150 square metres (1,614 square feet) in area with play structures/equipment, and located to the north of the existing building at 1350 Danforth Road. The Section 37 Agreement shall include details respecting legal access for all residents of all buildings to the play space area/structures, continued maintenance, and shall include provisions respecting legal access for the condominium corporation of the new building for maintenance access to the play area/structures; and
8. the provision of a barbeque pit amenity area, with a minimum of two barbeque pits, two picnic tables, one chess/checkerboard table and a shade structure for the casual use and enjoyment of all the residents and occupants of the four buildings on the site and not later than the occupancy of the new building on Parcel B.
c. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development, with no cost pass-through to residents of the existing rental buildings:
1. the provision of pedestrian pathways including the following:
i. a realigned pathway, northeast of the building at 1340 Danforth Road;
ii. a realigned pathway, southeast of the building at 1350 Danforth Road;
iii. a new pathway south of the building at 1350 Danforth Road to connect with the new driveway/sidewalk from Danforth Road;
iv. a new pathway, to the north of the building at 1350 Danforth Road to connect with the new playground areas;
v. new seating and passive recreation areas; and
vi. enhanced landscaping including new trees and shrubs/plantings.
2. the owner will provide, prior to the issuance of any building permit on Parcel B, a minimum of four security cameras within the underground parking garages of 1340 and 1360 Danforth Road to cover all entrances and exits within the respective garages;
3. the provision of, prior to the issuance of any building permit on Parcel B, a minimum of three new lighting structures; one near the underground parking entrance for 1340 Danforth Road and two near the underground parking entrance for 1360 Danforth Road;
4. the owner of 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road provide, prior to the issuance of the first building permit on Parcel B, a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan;
5. the owner to provide for access for tenant groups from the buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road to the meeting room space of the new condominium, to be provided for at least a 20 year period following construction of the new building. Details respecting legal access, means of access, cost sharing arrangements, scheduling and availability, all to be set out in the Section 37 Agreement;
6. site plan drawings to be submitted for Site Plan Approval are to include two, car-share vehicle parking spaces, at grade;
7. easements in favour of the City for: pedestrian access along defined pathways/sidewalks through the site from Danforth Road to the west gate of Knob Hill Park;
8. an easement in favour of the City for vehicular access through the site from Danforth Road to the west gate of Knob Hill Park shall be provided; and
9. the applicant shall construct and maintain the development on Parcel B in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
This application proposes the intensification of lands at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road by constructing an 18-storey, 277-unit residential (condominium) building behind three existing 15-storey rental apartment buildings and immediately adjacent to Knob Hill Park. The application also proposes 12 new rental units be constructed within the existing rental buildings by converting existing non-residential space to residential use. The owner intends to sever the lands to create a parcel of land that would contain the existing buildings; a parcel containing the new building to the rear of the rental buildings, and a parcel, adjacent to the ravine that would be conveyed to the City. An easement would facilitate permanent vehicular, pedestrian and servicing access to the new building from Danforth Road.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the rezoning application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 29, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72451.pdf) (July 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road - Zoning Amendment - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72315.pdf) Notice of Public Meeting - 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72316.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Mike Labbe, President and C.E.O., Options for Homes Toronto |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Firieshta Deen (SC.New.SC34.30.1)
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Jennifer Telfer (SC.New.SC34.30.2) |
| SC34.31 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:40 |
| 1251 Bridletowne Circle (southern portion) - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report |
| Bill 1014 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the L'Amoreaux Community Zoning By-law 12466, for the lands at 1251 Bridletowne Circle (southern portion) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to report dated July 28, 2014.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:
a. payment of a cash contribution of $150,000, prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit for a building or structure on the lot, to be directed towards capital improvement to the public pedestrian and cycling pathway between Finch Avenue East, and the existing bridge over the channelized watercourse (Highland Creek – Bendale Branch, Section 14), which amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the registration of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment;
b. the owner entering into a municipal infrastructure agreement with the City of Toronto, Engineering and Construction Services, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for a building or structure on the lot, to secure the re-construction of the 1.5 metre public pedestrian walkway between Timberbank Boulevard and the existing bridge over the channelized watercourse (Highland Creek – Bendale Branch, Section 14). The estimated re-construction value ranges between $200,000 to $250,000, and includes plan preparation and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) approvals by the owner; and
c. the following is also recommended to be included in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 28, 2014) Report from Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District |
| Summary |
The application to amend the Official Plan and L'Amoreaux Community Zoning By-law was submitted in support of a residential development of 390 dwelling units of primarily stacked townhouses. The revised proposal proposes a total 282 dwelling units comprised of: 168, 4-storey stacked townhouse units; 92, 4-storey back-to-back townhouse units with a basement; and 22, 3-storey traditional townhouse units. The modified proposal reduces the overall density from the original 390 dwelling units to the current 282 dwelling units, and introduces back-to-back townhouses. The subject lands are located on the southerly portion of lands formerly occupied by the Timothy Eaton Business and Technical Institute (TEBTI) at 1251 Bridletowne Circle.
The proposed residential development consisting of a mix in townhouse built forms is provided for within the Neighbourhoods designation in the Official Plan. Neighbourhoods provide for residential uses in lower scale buildings, including townhouses and walk-up apartments up to 4 storeys. The proposed development is considered appropriate given the proposal's location, relative large-sized property and its area context. The proposed private road, located partially above the underground parking garage, is designed to meet the design criteria for a public street, and is supportable in this case.
The amendment to the L'Amoreaux Community Zoning By-law No. 12466 would permit the proposed residential uses and provide applicable development standards to support the proposed development. As well, rezoning of the hazard lands located on the easterly portion of the site to Open Space, is consistent with Official Plan policies.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the L'Amoreaux Community Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 28, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1251 Bridletowne Circle (southern portion) - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72317.pdf) Notice of Public Meeting - 1251 Bridletowne Circle (southern portion) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72318.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Barry Waltman, President, Genesis Homes |
| SC34.33 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:37 |
| Ceremonial Dedication of Canlish Road as "Cpl. Joshua Caleb Baker". |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the ceremonial dedication of Canlish Road as "Cpl. Joshua Caleb Baker".
2. City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to alter the street signs on Canlish Road to reflect both the official street name and the name "Cpl. Joshua Caleb Baker". |
| Origin |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson. |
| Summary |
Joshua Caleb Baker joined the Canadian Armed Forces at age 18 and was killed on duty in Afghanistan on February 12, 2010 at only 24 years of age.
Joshua, his mother and grandmother all grew up on Canlish Road and it is fitting that Joshua's sacrifice be recognized in this way.
A petition of approximately 65 signatures from households on Canlish Road has been submitted to my office in support of ceremoniously dedicating Canlish Road in Cpl. Joshua Caleb Baker's honour. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Thompson - Ceremonial Dedication of Canlish Road as "Cpl. Joshua Caleb Baker".
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72725.pdf) |
| SC34.36 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:42 |
| Subdivision Agreement (Fence Design Issue) - Neilson Road and Finch Avenue East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request City Planning Staff to replace the approved fence design drawing submitted pursuant to Section 22 of the Subdivision Agreement dated August 16, 2000 (Instrument No. E379051), in order to permit fences with a maximum height of 6 feet to be constructed on the lots that front on Neilson Road and Finch Avenue East that provides security and privacy for the residents as expressed by residents at an information meeting held on July 22, 2014. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Cho |
| Summary |
Motion by Councillor Cho. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter by Councillor Cho - Fence Issue - Lots fronting on Neilson Road and Finch Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72804.pdf) |
| Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 34 |
| TE34.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Jarvis Street, Between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street |
| Public Notice Given |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the public lane extending westerly from Jarvis Street between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-27553 and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2012-094 (the "Lane"), attached to the report dated July 23, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report, dated July 23, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, conditional upon the City entering into an agreement with 1418297 Ontario Inc., (the "Applicant"), wherein the Applicant agrees to purchase the Lane from the City on terms satisfactory to the City and the Zoning By-law amendment (Application No. 12 245456 STE 27 OZ) pertaining to 186 and 188 Jarvis Street becoming final and binding and coming into full force and effect. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services recommends that the public lane extending westerly from Jarvis Street between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street be permanently closed. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Jarvis Street, Between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72028.pdf) Sketch No. PS-2012-094 - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Jarvis Street, Between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72031.pdf) Appendix A - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Jarvis Street, Between 186 and 188 Jarvis Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72032.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Neil Smiley, Partner, Fasken Martineau |
| TE34.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:21 |
| Naming of Proposed Public Street at 1145 Ossington Avenue |
| Communication TE34.2.10 has been submitted on this Item |
| Public Notice Given |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the name, "Salvador Allende Court", to identify the proposed public street at 1145 Ossington Avenue. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Engineering and Construction Services |
| Summary |
At its meeting of June 17, 2014, the Toronto and East York Community Council adopted Item TE33.88 requesting the Manager of Land and Property Surveys to investigate and report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the suitability of naming the proposed public street located within the development at 1145 Ossington Avenue as "Salvador Allende Boulevard", or any other appropriate street type designation.
The naming proposal does not comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy because consent from the named party’s representative was not provided, as is required by the Policy.
This report recommends that the name be rejected because of non-compliance. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Engineering and Construction Services - Naming of Proposed Public Street at 1145 Ossington Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72037.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Barry Lipton |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Luz Bascunan, President, Escuela Pioneros de la Paz (TE.Supp.TE34.2.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Luis Tapia, Victor Jara Cultural Group (TE.Supp.TE34.2.2) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Patricio Powell, Consulate General of Chile in Toronto (TE.Supp.TE34.2.3) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Angelica Galarce, Artistic Director, Grupo Chile (TE.Supp.TE34.2.4) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Juan and Cecilia Nunez (TE.Supp.TE34.2.5) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Joan Simalchik (TE.Supp.TE34.2.6) (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Nicolas Suarez, Co-ordinator, Movimiento de Isquierda Siglo 21, Toronto, Canada (TE.Supp.TE34.2.7) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Patricio Bascunan, President, Casa Salvador Allende - Toronto (TE.Supp.TE34.2.8) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Patricio Bascunan, President, Casa Salvador Allende - Toronto (TE.Supp.TE34.2.9) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 18, 2014) Letter from Isabel Allende Bussi, President of the Senate, Republic of Chile (CC.Supp.TE34.2.10)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49535.pdf) |
| TE34.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Final Report - 995 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1015 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 995 Lansdowne Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 10, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to rezone the property at 995 Lansdowne Avenue from Industrial to Residential in order to permit an 8-unit apartment building with 3 parking spaces. The applicant has constructed a two-storey addition and made interior alterations to the existing non-conforming detached dwelling. The applicant has also applied for a zoning amendment for the adjacent property at 997 Lansdowne Avenue, which is addressed in a separate report to the August 12, 2014 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 995 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72148.pdf) Attachment 7 - Draft By-law - Final Report - 995 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72737.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| James McMillan |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Tim Pettigrew (TE.Supp.TE34.6.1)
|
| TE34.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Final Report - 997 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1016 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 997 Lansdowne Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to rezone the property at 997 Lansdowne Avenue from Industrial to Residential in order to permit an 8-unit apartment building with 2 parking spaces. The applicant has constructed a two-storey addition and made interior alterations to the existing mixed-use building. The applicant has also applied for a zoning amendment for the adjacent property at 995 Lansdowne Avenue, which is addressed in a separate report to the August 12, 2014 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 997 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72169.pdf) Attachment 7 - Draft By-law - Final Report - 997 Lansdowne Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72721.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| James McMillan |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Tim Pettigrew (TE.Supp.TE34.7.1)
|
| TE34.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19, 20 |
| Final Report - Bathurst Street - Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Official Plan Amendment |
| Bill 1052 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment for Bathurst Street - Queen Street West to Dupont Street, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
a. Policy 12.3 contained in Attachment 1 be amended to read as follows:
"12.3 New buildings on properties designated as Mixed Use will have a maximum height of 4-storeys."
b. Policy 13 Alexandra Park West Character Area, contained in Attachment 1 be amended by adding the following:
"13.4 The Scadding Court Community Centre and library at the southeast corner of Bathurst and Dundas Street West will be the subject of a further study based on the set of principles outlined in the Final Report for the Scadding Court Community Centre Revitalization as adopted by City Council on November 27, 2012."
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the heritage attributes, and options for inclusion on the City's heritage inventory, of the properties identified in Section 4.2 of the "Better Bathurst" Final Report by DTAH.
4. City Council direct City Planning staff to complete Urban Design Guidelines and a Public Realm Plan for the Bathurst Street Study Area. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
In July 2012, City Council directed staff to initiate a planning study focussing on built form and land use on both sides of Bathurst Street from Dupont to Queen Street. The study is now complete and this report recommends the adoption of a new Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) to guide development in the study area.
The recommended SASP defines the existing elements of the street that should be reinforced and enhanced, along with direction for areas of the street than can accommodate change. The draft policy reinforces the prevailing fine grain character of the street while providing more emphasis on public realm and streetscape, heritage, character of the street, intersections with Avenues and with Dupont Street, and transition to adjacent residential uses.
The initial Final Report on the study, which was approved by City Council at its meeting on July 8, 2014, recommended an amendment to former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, Section 12(2)270 to limit the total amount of non-residential gross floor area of any one retail establishment in the study area to 3,500 square metres, and limit the width of any single retail or service use on the ground floor to 12 metres. In addition, the report contained the draft Official Plan direction which forms the basis of this report. Lastly, the report recommended that the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District initiate a study of the properties around the Bathurst/Bloor intersection and that City Council authorize a Heritage Conservation District Study for the area on Markham Street known as Mirvish Village. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Bathurst Street - Queen Street West to Dupont Street: Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72135.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Barbara Woloszczuk |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Woloszczuk (TE.Supp.TE34.8.1)
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Stefan Woloszczuk (TE.Supp.TE34.8.2) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, solicitors for Torgan Management Inc. (TE.Supp.TE34.8.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49056.pdf) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Mark Noskiewicz, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of Riotrin Properties (Bathurst) Inc. (TE.Supp.TE34.8.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49059.pdf) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Catherine M. Biesma, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the University Health Network (TE.Supp.TE34.8.5) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49060.pdf) |
| TE34.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment and Rental Demolition Under Municipal Code 667 Applications |
| The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE34.9a for information) See also Item TE34.178 |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (July 10, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 11 to the report (July 10, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
a. Replace Section 2(j) in Attachment No. 11: Draft Zoning By-law, with the following:
2(j)(i) parking spaces for the residential uses shall be provided on the lot in accordance with the following standards:
Dwelling type Minimum number of parking spaces required
Bachelor Unit 0.3 spaces per unit (up to 45 square metres)
Bachelor Unit 1.0 space per unit (greater than 45 square metres)
1-bedroom Units 0.5 spaces per unit
2-bedroom Units 0.8 space per unit
3+ bedroom Units 1.0 spaces per unit
Residential Visitors 0.12 spaces per unit
(ii) parking spaces for the non-residential uses shall be provided on the lot in accordance with the following standards:
Use Minimum Parking Requirement
Retail Uses 1.0 spaces per 100 square metres of gross floor area
(iii) Notwithstanding 2(j)(i) above, the total number of resident and resident visitor parking spaces required may be reduced by 45 parking spaces, provided that the remaining parking spaces include 4 car-share parking spaces.
(iv) The parking spaces may be provided and maintained on the lot in a commercial parking garage.
b. Adding the following definitions to Section 5 in Attachment No. 11: Draft Zoning By-law:
"Car share" means the practice where a number of people share the use of one or more cars that are owned by a profit or non-profit car-sharing car organization and where such organization may require that use of cars be reserved in advance, charge fees based on time and/or kilometres driven, and set membership requirements of the car-sharing organization, including the payment of a membership fee that may or may not be refundable.
"car-share parking space" means a parking space that is reserved and actively used for car sharing.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to incorporate elements of the north and west façades, as much as possible, of the existing building at 231-237 College Street into the design of the development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, such agreement to be registered on title to secure the following facilities, services and matters as follows:
The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
a. a cash contribution in the amount of $500,000, payable to the City of Toronto prior to the issuance of any above grade building permits for the development of the lot, the amount to be used for:
i. a cash contribution in the amount of $200,000 for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing in Ward 20;
ii. a cash contribution in the amount of $150,000 for streetscape improvements in the immediate area;
iii. a cash contribution in the amount of $50,000 for improvement to the Huron Street Garden located at 180 Huron Street; and
iv. a cash contribution in the amount of $100,000 for cycling infrastructure in the immediate area.
v. the amounts indicated in i) through iv) above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and
vi. in the event the cash contributions referred to in Section (a)(i) through (iv) above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The provision and maintenance of not less than seventeen (17) new replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, comprised of 6 one-bedroom and 11 two bedroom units as shown on the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated April 23, 2014 with any revisions to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and of which two one-bedrooms shall have no rent stipulation, at least two (2) one bedroom and two (2) two bedroom units shall have affordable rents and the remainder shall have no higher than mid-range rents.
ii. The owner shall provide in the Tenant Relocation and Assistant plan a minimum of the following matters for all affected tenants, including: an extended notice period; financial assistance beyond the minimums of the Residential Tenancies Act; the right to return to a rental replacement unit for all of the tenants; a moving allowance and other financial assistance on a sliding scale geared to the length of occupancy of each tenant. All of these matters must be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
iii. Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan including but not limited to details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
6. City Council approve the application to demolish the 15 rental housing units located at 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of the rental housing units:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 17 residential rental dwelling units in the development for a period of 20 years, comprising 6 one-bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units, of which two (2) one bedroom units shall have no rent stipulation, least two (2) one bedroom and two (2) two bedroom units shall have affordable rents and the remainder shall have no higher than mid-range rents;
b. the owner provide tenant relocation assistance to the tenants in the existing rental units including the right to return to a rental replacement unit as provided for in the approved Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
c. that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect;
d. the owner shall enter into and register on title one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in (a) and (b) above and as described in the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached hereto (Attachment 11) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
e. the owner shall enter into and register on title, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 15 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act after the satisfaction of the following conditions:
a. that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;
b. the satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 6; and
c. Site Plan Approval for the proposed development is issued pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and pursuant to the Zoning By-law Amendment.
8. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7.
9. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first Building Permit for the foundation of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:
a. the owner erect a residential building on site no later than two (2) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and
b. should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Condition 9a, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.
10. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreements. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to report directly to Council for its meeting on August 25, 2014, with respect to the requirement that the owner incorporate elements of the north and west façades, as much as possible, of the existing building at 231-237 College Street into the design of the development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of a 17-storey building containing 142 dwelling units, and retail space at grade at 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street.
This application also proposes to demolish all existing buildings on the site which currently includes15 rental housing units at affordable and mid-range rents. The demolition of the rental housing requires a Section 111 permit issued under the City of Toronto’s Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion By-law (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code).
A Rental Housing Demolition Application (13 142127 STE 20 RH ) has been filed under Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to permit the demolition of the existing 15 residential rental units at the above addresses. The applicants have proposed a full replacement of the rental units as well as new rental units within the building envelope with affected tenants receiving relocation assistance and the right to return to a replacement unit at a similar rent.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended. This report also recommends approval of the rental housing demolition application under Municipal Code 667, subject to conditions. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 231-237 College Street, and 177-189 Huron Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment and Rental Demolition Under Municipal Code 667 Applications - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72139.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 19, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment and Rental Demolition under Municipal Code 667 Applications (TE34.9a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73071.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol Barristers and Solicitors |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Max Allen, Vice President, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE34.9.1)
|
| Declared Interests (Community Council) |
| The following member(s) declared an interest: |
| TE34.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1019 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1, to the report (August 1, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
A. Provide a cash contribution of $4,000,000, prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for any development, for the following local community improvement initiatives:
i. $1,000,000 for the John Street Cultural Corridor;
ii. $400,000 for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) facilities in Ward 20;
iii. $1,500,000 for streetscape improvements in the immediate area, which may include a future east/west connection to the PATH system;
iv. $500,000 for community services and facilities in Ward 20;
v. $100,000 for the Toronto Book Award Plaque Program, of which $50,000 shall be payable prior to the introduction of Bills; and
vi. $500,000 for public art, in accordance with the City of Toronto’s Percent for Public Art Program.
B. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section A.i. through vi. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
C. The payments required in Section A.i. through vi. herein shall increase in accordance with the increase in the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement or, if the site specific by-laws for the project are appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, from the date of the Board Order approving the by-laws, to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.
The following shall be secured as a matter of legal convenience:
D. Provide the City with documentation as to LEED certification of the development and the marketing materials that will include information on LEED certification.
E. The design of the building and site plan shall be generally in accordance with the plans associated with the Zoning By-law Amendment application, on file with the City Planning Division, and shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
|
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to rezone the lands at 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street to permit the development of a 54-storey commercial office tower. The application proposes incorporate a portion of the heritage building located at 156 Front Street West into the podium of the new office tower, in accordance with the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Plan.
The proposed development would have an overall non-residential gross floor area of approximately 126,570 square metres, an overall building height of 265 metres, and a proposed density of 21.7 times the lot area. The proposal will provide 370 parking spaces within 4 levels of underground parking.
The proposed office tower development, within the Financial District, and in close proximity to major regional transit hubs, such as Union Station, the Union Pearson Express, and the subway, meets the City's planning objectives for the area. In addition, it represents a significant investment in the downtown, replacing a surface parking lot and contributing the both the City's employment and tax base.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72353.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Patrick Devine, Dentons Canada LLP |
| 10a | Supplementary Report - 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
A report dated July 18, 2014, from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the construction of a 54-storey commercial office tower at 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street. The application proposes to incorporate a portion of the heritage building located at 156 Front Street West into the podium of the new office tower, in accordance with the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Plan.
The purpose of this report is to provide supplemental information to the July 24, 2014 report regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Section 37 under the Planning Act. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 156-174 Front Street West and 43-51 Simcoe Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72556.pdf) |
| TE34.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street (Entrance Addresses 151 Front Street West and 20 York Street) - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No.1 to the report (August 1, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report (August 1, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. A cash contribution of $1.75 million, to be paid prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for any development, for the following local community improvement initiatives:
i. $50,000.00 for capital improvements to 168 John Street, $100,000 for the capital improvements of the block containing 6-28 Henry Street, 40-42 Baldwin Street, 181-203 Beverly Street and 5-15 Cecil Street, and $150,000 for other capital improvements of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) facilities in Ward 20;
ii. $1,000,000 for streetscape improvement to the John Street Cultural Corridor;
iii. $350,000 for weather protection and improvements to the four at-grade TCC stairways at St. Andrew subway station; and
iv. $100,000 for the Toronto Book Award Plaque Program, which shall be payable prior to the introduction of Bills.
b. Provide a publically-accessible privately-owned open space/pedestrian plaza, at the north end of the site, landscaped to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
c. Make the publically-accessible privately-owned open space/pedestrian plaza, at the north end of the site, available to the City of Toronto and its agencies, boards and commissions, or a non-profit organization approved by the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, City of Toronto for use at no cost, for a minimum of at least six (6) events per year.
d. Provide a public art contribution in accordance with the City of Toronto’s Percent for Public Art Program.
e. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section 1.a. through d. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
f. The payments required in Clause 1.a. through d. herein, shall increase in accordance with the increase in the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement or, if the site specific by-laws for the project are appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, from the date of the Board order approving the by-laws, to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.
The following matters will be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a matter of legal convenience:
g. Provide documentation as to LEED certification of the development and the marketing materials that will include information on LEED certification.
h. Provide a pedestrian walkway through the new building proposed within the site.
i. Space within the development site shall be provided for the construction of any transformer vaults, hydro vaults, Bell maintenance structures, sewer maintenance holes, exhaust and intake vents and stairwell and associated enclosure.
j. Incorporate in the construction of the building, of exterior materials to be shown for the podium along Simcoe Street, Front Street West and Station Street, pedestrian weather protection and landscaping materials.
k. Provide and maintaining an irrigation system for any proposed trees within the public road allowance.
l. Provide, prior to site plan approval, an architectural plan and/or renderings of the roof of the podium, to include a green roof, or a combination of an appropriately landscaped roof and other architectural design treatment and exterior materials.
m. Implement any necessary mitigation measures, to address the recommendations of a Pedestrian Level Wind Study.
n. Revisions to the development, if necessary, and a Letter of Credit, to implement the recommendations of a Street Lighting Assessment.
o. Continuous weather protection for pedestrians with a minimum depth of 3 metres along the frontage of Simcoe Street from the former north limit of Station Street to the southern property boundary.
p. Enter into an agreement satisfactory to the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, to secure the proposed canopy along a portion of the Simcoe Street frontage of the site, affixed to the existing building at 151 Front Street West.
q. Submit, for review and acceptance prior to site plan approval, a Pedestrian Flow and Safety Review to the Program Manager, Transportation Planning, City Planning Division.
r. Submit, for review and acceptance prior to site plan approval, a Transportation Demand Management Plan to the General Manager of Transpiration Services, including measures to reduce automobile use.
s. Having a qualified Transportation Engineer/Planner certify, in writing, to the General Manager of Transportation Services, prior to site plan approval, that the development has been designed and constructed in accordance with the Transportation Demand Management Plan approved by the General Manager, Transportation Services.
t. Provide, maintain and operate the Transportation Demand Management measures, facilities and strategies stipulated in the Transportation Demand Management Plan approved by the General Manager, Transportation Services.
u. Submit a traffic monitoring report within six months of occupancy of the office building to identify vehicular trip distribution patterns associated with the project and identify mitigating measures to address any poor levels of services experienced at Front Street West/Simcoe Street, former Station Street/York Street, former Station Street/Simcoe Street intersections, for the review and approval of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
v. Provide a letter of Credit in the amount of $50,000 to cover the costs associated with the following measures, as deemed appropriate by the General Manager of Transportation Services:
i. implementing mitigating measures such as changes to traffic regulations and installation of regulatory signage; and
ii. implementing the approved signal timing modification and signal phasing adjustments identified at the Front Street West/Simcoe Street, former Station Street/York Street, former Station Street/lower Simcoe Street, York Street/University Avenue/Front Street West and York Street/Bremner Boulevard intersections, which are attributable, in part, to this development, if any.
w. Submit, prior to site plan approval a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
x. Provide, prior to site plan approval, plans for interpretive panels or other interpretive materials to communicate the development history of the property: the research, design, and location of the interpretive materials will be to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
y. Provide, prior to site plan approval, landscape plans for the publically accessible private open space/pedestrian plaza, which includes design consideration of the history of the site, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
z. Provide, prior to site plan approval, a Letter of Credit in a form and in an amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work for the research, production and installation of interpretive materials.
aa. Obtain final approval for the interpretive materials erected on the property from the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services prior to the release of the Letter of Credit.
bb. Provide, prior to site plan approval, a revised Vibration Assessment, and if necessary, incorporating vibration migrating measures and revised drawings, prior to approval of the site plan application and have a qualified consultant certify, in writing, that the development has been designed and constructed in accordance with the approved vibration mitigating measures.
cc. Provide, prior to the site plan approval, a revised Noise Impact Study, and if necessary, incorporate noise mitigating measures and revised drawings, prior to approval of the site plan application and have a qualified consultant certify, in writing, that the development has been designed and constructed in accordance with the approved noise mitigation measures.
dd. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner and the City may modify or amend the said agreement(s), from time to time and upon the consent of the City and the owner, without further amendment to those provisions of this schedule which identify the facilities, services and matters to be secured.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into a secured Agreement with the City to ensure the provision of all necessary improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into any other Agreements as necessary. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to develop the lands at 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street (entrance addresses 151 Front Street West and 20 York Street) with a 48-storey office building. The proposed office tower would have a gross floor area of 133,033 square metres, an overall building height of 239 metres, and a proposed density of 13.27 times the lot area. The applicant proposes to provide 319 parking spaces in 6 levels of below grade parking.
The proposed office tower development, within the Financial District, and in close proximity to major regional transit hubs, such as Union Station, the Union Pearson Express, and the subway, meets the City's planning objectives for the area. In addition, it represents a significant investment in the downtown, contributing to both the City's employment and tax base.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street (Entrance Addresses 151 Front Street West and 20 York Street) - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72183.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Hugh Clark, Allied Properties REIT |
| 11a | Supplementary Report - 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street (Entrance Addresses 151 Front Street West and 20 York Street) |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
A report dated July 24, 2014, from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, recommends approval of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit the construction of a 48-storey office building at 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street. The proposed office tower would have a gross floor area of 133,033 square metres, an overall building height of 239 metres, and a proposed density of 13.27 times the lot area.
The purpose of this report is to provide supplemental information to the July 24, 2014 report regarding Section 37 benefits to be secured under the Planning Act, and the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 171 Front Street West and 7 Station Street (entrance addresses 151 Front Street West and 20 York Street) - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72585.pdf) |
| TE34.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the proposed demolition of the heritage property known as the Skywalk as well as the heritage property identified by the addresses 7, 7A and 7B Station Street, approve the alteration of 151 Front Street and 20 York Street and approve the associated new development proposal for a 48-storey tower comprising offices, retail uses within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District (USHCD) substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA, dated June 13, 2014 and the plans by Sweeny & Co Architects Inc. contained with the HIA, all in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:
a. That the related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. That prior to Site Plan Approval for the property at 171 Front Street, 151 Front Street, 7 Station Street and 20 York Street, the applicant shall:
i. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant for the restoration of the heritage buildings located at 20 York Street, and 151 Front Street, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement, dated June 13, 2014 prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects.
ii. Complete all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. Provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan and the Landscape Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
c. That prior to the release of any heritage permit related to the demolition of the Skywalk and 7, 7A and 7B Station Street or the alteration of 151 Front Street and 20 York Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:
i. Provide as-built drawings and photographs to fully document both designated properties (the Skywalk and 7 Station Street) to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the demolition and alteration of the properties, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. Have obtained Final Site Plan approval for such property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
iv. Provide plans for interpretive panels or other interpretive materials to communicate the development history of the property: the research, design, and location of the interpretive materials will be to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
v. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and interpretive materials.
d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the applicant shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. |
| Origin |
| (June 26, 2014) Report from Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the heritage properties located at 7, 7A and 7B Station Street (including the Skywalk), minor alterations to the designated properties at 151 Front Street and 20 York Street and the associated new development proposal within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District (USHCD).
The development proposal by Sweeney Sterling Finlayson & Co. Architects Inc. and Allied Properties REIT consists of a 48-storey tower comprising offices, retail uses, and six levels of underground parking. The office tower would be built over the westerly section of Station Street and lands to the south of Station Street, an area now known municipally as 171 Front Street West. A two level public plaza would also be constructed over Station Street on the east end of the site.
Should Council endorse this strategy staff recommend that the owner document the heritage resources prior to demolition, provide a Conservation Plan for exterior restoration on the remaining designated buildings and implement an Interpretation Plan for the site. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72346.pdf) Attachment 1-4 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72354.pdf) Attachment 5-8 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72356.pdf) Attachment 9-11 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72358.pdf) Attachment 12-14 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72359.pdf) Attachment 15-18 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72360.pdf) Attachment 19 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72361.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Hugh Clark, Allied Properties REIT |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 4, 2014) E-mail from Rod McQueen (TE.Supp.TE34.12.1)
|
| 12a | Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property Within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District and Approval of Alterations and New Construction - 151 Front Street West, 20 York Street, 7, 7A and 7B Station Street and the Skywalk
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71847.pdf) |
| TE34.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 489-499 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the property at 489-499 King Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to be provided prior to the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting of August 12, 2014.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council shall require the owner of the lands at 489-499 King Street West to:
a. Provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 489 King Street West prepared by ERA Architects dated June 16, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 489 King Street West substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings referenced in the Heritage Impact Assessment (dated June 14, 2014), and subject to and in accordance with the required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
c. Enter into a secured Agreement with the City to ensure the provision of all necessary improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.
d. Supply detailed loading surveys from other office developments within the area for review by Transportation Services staff as part of the site plan control application and increase the proposed loading facilities as required by Transportation Services staff if necessary.
e. Enter into an easement agreement with the owners of the adjacent property at 485 King Street West adjacent to provide for mutual access over the proposed driveway.
f. Provide a public pedestrian easement for the life of the building for access to the publicly accessible open space at the rear of the property to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. An indexed cash contribution, of $300,000 toward streetscape improvements on King Street West between Portland Street and Spadina Avenue to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, payable at the first above grade building permit.
ii. An indexed cash contribution of $50,000.00 for the maintenance of or the provision of new affordable housing in Ward 20, payable at the first above grade building permit.
iii. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section (i) and (ii) above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
The above noted cash contribution of $350,000 is to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the introduction of Bills to the date of payment.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval, the owner shall have:
- Completed all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
- Provided Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
- The related Zoning By-law amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Prior to the issuance of a Heritage Permit, the owner shall have:
- Provided full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
- Provided a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan.
iii. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall have:
- Provided a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by the heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
- Provided replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services
iv. Prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall address all outstanding requirements for a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment as well as the provisions for any additional Stage 3-4 archaeological assessment as outlined in the letter from City Planning dated July 21, 2014.
v. Prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall address the requirements for the removal of private trees on the site and adjacent the property as required by the City of Toronto Private Tree By-law as outlined in the memorandum from Urban Forestry Services staff dated August 30, 2012.
vi. The applicant shall undertake best efforts to minimize the extent and height of the mechanical penthouse.
vii. The applicant shall provide appropriate screening between the at-grade commercial uses and associated uses of the open space at the rear of the building and the residents to the south.
viii. A lighting plan will be submitted and approved through the site plan control application to address the issue of light impacts on the residential units south of the subject site.
ix. The applicant is required to enter into a construction management agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, prior to site plan approval. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to construct a 12-storey office building containing retail uses at grade at 489-499 King Street West. The proposed development would include a total of 24,476 square metres of gross floor area (gfa), including 1,173 square metres of retail use on the ground floor. Four levels of below-grade parking are proposed with 159 parking space and 107 bicycle parking spaces. Vehicular access will be provided from a private driveway off King Street West at the east side of the site.
The proposed development will add employment uses to a mixed-use community which has seen significant residential growth since the approval of the King-Spadina Part II Plan in 1996. The proposed development will also retain portions of the heritage building at 489 King Street West and provide a publicly accessible open space at the rear of the property and the potential for a mid-block connection between King Street West and Wellington Street West.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 489-499 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72256.pdf) Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment - 489-499 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72555.pdf) |
| TE34.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the property at 489 King Street West, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a twelve-storey building on and adjacent to the heritage property in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Sweeny & Co. Architects Inc. dated June 13, 2014 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated June 20, 2014, both on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council the owner shall:
i. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 489 King Street West substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Sweeny & Co. Architects Inc. dated June 13, 2014 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated June 20, 2014, and subject to and in accordance with the herein required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
ii. Provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 489 King Street West prepared by ERA Architects dated June 20, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval, the owner shall:
i. Complete all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
c. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval the related Zoning By-law amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
d. Prior to the issuance of a Heritage Permit, the owner shall:
i. Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan.
e. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:
i. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by the heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 489 King Street West (the Hart Building) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 489 King Street West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report dated June 20, 2014 from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.
6. City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 489 King Street West.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement. |
| Origin |
| (June 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the heritage property located at 489 King Street West (the Hart Building) in conjunction with an application to amend the Zoning By-law for the construction of a twelve storey mixed-use building at 489-499 King Street West, provided the Hart Building is retained, conserved, designated and subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement.
Should City Council endorse this strategy, staff recommend that Council state its intention to designate 489 King Street West under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, require the owner to enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City and authorize staff to take the necessary steps to enter into such Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term protection of 489 King Street West. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71602.pdf) Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71603.pdf) Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71604.pdf) Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71605.pdf) Attachment 4 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71606.pdf) Attachment 5 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71607.pdf) Attachment 6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71608.pdf) Attachment 7 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71649.pdf) Attachment 8 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71650.pdf) Attachment 9 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71651.pdf) Attachment 10 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71652.pdf) |
| 14a | Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 20, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from July 18, 2014 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 489 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72362.pdf) |
| TE34.15 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 324, 326, 328 and 332 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1033 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 324, 326, 328 and 332 Richmond Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
a. Section 2(e) in Attachment 8 be deleted and replaced with the following:
(e)(i) parking spaces for the residential uses shall be provided on the lot in accordance with the following standards:
Dwelling type Minimum number of parking spaces required
Bachelor Unit 0.30 spaces per unit
1-bedroom Units 0.50 spaces per unit
2-bedroom Units 0.75 spaces per unit
3+ bedroom Units 1.2 spaces per unit
Residential Visitors 0.06 spaces per unit
(ii) a minimum of 2 car share spaces (equivalent to 8 resident parking spaces) and to a maximum of 4 car share spaces
(iii) Notwithstanding 2(e)(i) above, the total number of resident and resident visitor parking spaces required may be reduced by a total of 50 parking spaces provided that the remaining parking spaces include a minimum of 18 visitor parking spaces and 2 car share parking spaces."
b. Section 3 in Attachment 8 be amended by adding the following definitions:
"car share" means the practice where a number of people share the use of one or more cars that are owned by a profit or non-profit sharing organization and where such organization may require that use of cars be reserved in advance, charge fees based on time and/or kilometres driven, and set membership requirements of the car-sharing organization, including the payment of a membership fee that may or not be refundable.
"car-share parking space" means a parking space that is reserved and actively used for car sharing.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require that the applicant provide parking on site as in accordance with the standards in the report from Engineering and Construction Services staff dated July 14, 2014.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. the owner will pay to the City, a cash payment of $80,000 payable within 30 days of the Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect, for the purpose of improvements of street kiosks at the Scadding Court Community Centre;
b. a cash payment of $200,000 to be payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit towards capital improvements to/or development of new Toronto Community Housing Corporation units in Ward 20;
c. a cash payment of $120,000, to be payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit towards local parkland, streetscape improvements and community facilities within the King-Spadina East Precinct;
d. a cash payment of $400,000, to be payable upon the registration of the residential condominium towards local parkland, streetscape improvements and community facilities within the King-Spadina East Precinct, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and appropriate City staff;
e. in the event the cash contributions referred to in Section (a) and (d) above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
f. City Council require that the amounts identified in a-d above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment;
g. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units to be constructed in the mixed-use building shall be capable of being designed as 3- bedroom units in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code and these dwelling units are to be shown on any marketing plans as 3-bedroom units and to be marketed as 3-bedroom units. These units may be sold and/or constructed with fewer bedrooms provided that there are provisions in the condominium documentation to allow renovation to 3-bedroom units.
ii. Require the owner to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to infrastructure are required to support the development.
iii. Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan including but not limited to details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The application proposes to construct a 25-storey mixed-use commercial and residential condominium with 310 residential units, 2 guest suites and commercial uses at-grade. Five and a half levels of below grade parking accommodate 122 residential parking spaces, 18 commercial pay parking spaces along with 310 residential and 50 visitor bicycle parking spaces. The height proposed is 80.8 metres to the roof exclusive of mechanical equipment. The development will have a total of 21,202 square metres of residential and commercial gross floor area.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 324, 326, 328 and 332 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72126.pdf) |
| TE34.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Final Report - 57 Spadina Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bills 1053 and 1054 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 436-86, as amended, for the lands at 57 Spadina Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
a. Subsection 1(e) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(e) notwithstanding subsection 1(d), balconies, ornamental and architectural elements over the area of the 1.3 metre future stratified lane widening shall be permitted provided such balconies, ornamental and architectural elements are located a minimum of 10 metres above grade, where terms of maintenance, indemnification and insurance in respect of the balcony, ornamental and architectural element projections are to be secured in the Site Plan Agreement, including additional and/or modified conditions as the City Solicitor may deem necessary in the interests of the Corporation".
b. Subsection 1(i) (ii) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(ii) a minimum of 2,500 square metres of non-residential gross floor area must be provided for office uses, with the total non-residential gross floor area on the lot not to exceed 5,000 square metres; and";
c. Subsection 2 of the draft by-law be amended by adding the following part (j), as follows:
"(j) "car share" means the practice where a number of people share the use of one or more cars that are owned by a profit or non-profit sharing organization and where such organization may require that use of cars be reserved in advance, charge fees based on time and/or kilometres driven, and set membership requirements of the car-sharing organization, including the payment of a membership fee that may or not be refundable."
d. Subsection 3(m) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(m) parking spaces for residents must be provided and maintained on the lot in accordance with the following minimum standards:
i. 0.3 parking spaces for each bachelor dwelling unit;
ii. 0.5 parking spaces for each one bedroom dwelling unit;
iii. 0.75 parking spaces for each two bedroom dwelling unit; and
iv. 1.2 parking spaces for each three or more bedroom dwelling unit.
Notwithstanding the total number of resident parking spaces provided pursuant to the above-noted ratios, the total resident parking spaces may be reduced by a maximum of 38 parking spaces, and that a minimum of two car share spaces shall be included."
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 57 Spadina Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 21, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York, with the following amendments:
a. Subsection 3.(B)ii) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(B) ii) A minimum of 2,500 square metres of gross floor area for non-residential uses must be provided for office uses, with the total gross floor area for non-residential uses on the lot not to exceed 5,000 square metres; and";
b. Subsection 3.(H) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(H) Despite subsection (G) of this By-law, balconies, ornamental and architectural elements over the area of the 1.3 metre future stratified lane widening shall be permitted provided such balconies, ornamental and architectural elements are located a minimum of 10 metres above grade, where terms of maintenance, indemnification and insurance in respect of the balcony, ornamental and architectural element projections are to be secured in the Site Plan Agreement, including additional and/or modified conditions as the City Solicitor may deem necessary in the interests of the Corporation.";
c. Subsection 3.(O) of the draft by-law be amended to read as follows:
"(O) Parking spaces for residents must be provided and maintained on the lot in accordance with the following minimum standards:
(i) 0.3 parking spaces for each bachelor dwelling unit;
(ii) 0.5 parking spaces for each one bedroom dwelling unit;
(iii) 0.75 parking spaces for each two bedroom dwelling unit; and
(iv) 1.2 parking spaces for each three or more bedroom dwelling unit.
Despite the total number of resident parking spaces provided pursuant to the above-noted ratios, the total resident parking spaces may be reduced by a maximum of 38 parking spaces, and that a minimum of two car share spaces shall be included."; and
d. Subsection 3.(W) of the draft by-law be amended by adding the following part iii:
"iii. "Car share" means the practice where a number of people share the use of one or more cars that are owned by a profit or non-profit sharing organization and where such organization may require that use of cars be reserved in advance, charge fees based on time and/or kilometres driven, and set membership requirements of the car-sharing organization, including the payment of a membership fee that may or not be refundable."
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to submit a revised Functional Servicing Report demonstrating sufficient capacity to accommodate the demand for this development, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.
5. Before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into a secured Agreement with the City to ensure the provision of all necessary improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure in connection with the revised Functional Servicing Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.
6. Before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The owner shall provide community benefits having a total value of two million dollars ($2,000,000) recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are identified below, and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of approval of the bills to the date the payment is made:
i. prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $200,000 towards the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of maintaining and constructing affordable rental housing units in Ward 20, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and
ii. prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $1,300,000.00 towards community services and facilities and public realm improvements in Ward 20, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and
iii. prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $500,000.00 towards improvements to the City-owned laneway to the south of the property, between Spadina Avenue and the east limit of the property at 393 King Street West, excluding the lane widening to be conveyed to the City, the design of such to be determined in conjunction with, and co-ordinated with, site plan approval of the development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and construction co-ordinated with the Construction Management Plan referred to in subsection 6.c.iv.
b. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 6.a.i. and ii. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
c. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The owner shall submit a Pedestrian Wind Study, and implement the mitigation measures listed in the Study through the Site Plan Approval process to ensure wind velocity is within acceptable levels, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
ii. The owner shall provide 10% family sized dwelling units in the development. A minimum of 8% of the units in the development shall be constructed as 3 bedroom units with a minimum unit area of 79 square metres, in compliance with the Ontario Building Code. A minimum of 2% of the units in the development may be constructed as 2 bedroom units that are convertible to 3 bedroom units through renovation or through knock out panels between units, in compliance with the Ontario Building Code.
iii. The owner shall construct the streetscape fronting on Spadina Avenue, subject to any requirements imposed in the Site Plan Approval process, in accordance with the Streetscape Manual or to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
iv. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the owner shall submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and thereafter in support of the development, shall implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include, but not limited to, details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates and significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary.
v. Prior to Site Plan Approval on the lot, the owner shall convey land to the City for the purpose of widening public laneways, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services and the City Solicitor as follows:
i. A strip of land approximately 1.17 metres in width and abutting the City owned laneway to the north shall be conveyed commencing a minimum of 1.2 metres below finished ground level.
ii. A strip of land approximately 1.3 metres in width and abutting the City owned laneway to the south shall be conveyed commencing from a minimum of 1.2 metres below finished ground level to a minimum of 10 metres above finished ground level. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report recommends approval of a 36-storey mixed use building, containing 313 residential units, 1,726 square metres of retail space, and 3,246 square metres of commercial office space at 57 Spadina Avenue. The development provides for 191 vehicular parking spaces within a 5-level underground garage, and 352 bicycle parking spaces on the ground floor, 5th and 6th storeys of the building. The existing 2-storey brick building is proposed to be demolished.
The proposal increases the existing commercial office gross floor area on the site, and provides an additional 1,744 square metres of commercial office space within the King-Spadina area.
This report reviews and recommends approval to the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 57 Spadina Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72186.pdf) Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to General Zoning By-law No. 438-86 - 57 Spadina Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72741.pdf) Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 - 57 Spadina Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72750.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, counsel to Terracap Management Inc. (TE.Supp.TE34.16.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49049.pdf) |
| TE34.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:21 |
| Final Report - 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 1-83 for the former City of York respecting By-law 533-2010 (OMB), for the lands at 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to report (July 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct appropriate staff to enter into a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the City to provide section 37 funding in the amount of $25,000 for capital improvements to the playground at Holy Rosary Catholic School in return for public access to the playground for a term of at least 20 years on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council direct the City Solicitor to complete the amendment of the existing Section 37 Agreement for 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue to provide for the allocation of $25,000 for capital improvements to the playground at Holy Rosary Catholic (Elementary) School, and $150,000 for a public art project at Bathurst Street and Vaughan Road. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This City-initiated Zoning By-law amendment is to amend certain of the Section 37 provisions of the site specific Zoning By-law amendment for 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue, to permit the allocation of $25,000 for capital improvements to the playground at Holy Rosary Catholic (Elementary) School, and $150,000 for the public art project at Bathurst Street and Vaughan Road and to provide an updated mechanism for a reallocation of funds in the future in the event any portion of Section 37 funds remain unused.
The proposed amendment is appropriate and represents good planning.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Final Report - 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71505.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Robert G. Doumani, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of Laurie Investments (Toronto) Limited (TE.Supp.TE34.17.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49113.pdf) |
| TE34.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Final Report - 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement securing the benefits as follows:
i. The securing of the rental tenure of the existing 627 units in the three buildings municipally known as 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard for a minimum of 20 years, commencing from the date of Council's decision, with no applications for demolition, or conversion from residential rental use, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (Chief Planner) and the City Solicitor.
ii. The provision of site improvements with no cost pass-through to the tenants of the five rental buildings in the Brentwood Towers apartment complex, to include at least restoration and reinstalling of one of the existing main fountains and a section of the existing concrete water feature structure, restoration of the two elevated observation/seating decks and related staircases, improvements to the outdoor amenity space including permanent outdoor seating, barbecue station, construction of a landscaped walkway from Lascelles Boulevard through to the amenity area with the provision of wall mounted lighting and Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Spaces (POPS) directional signage, substantial mature tree planting in the outdoor amenity area, new sidewalks around the entire outdoor amenity area and townhouse development that provide safe access for tenants to all of their buildings and the outdoor amenity area.
iii. The Owner shall provide, prior to the release of a building permit for the townhouse development, two new staircase connections down to the City's Beltline walkway on the north side of the property with no cost pass-through to any of the tenants of the Brentwood Towers apartment complex or the City relating to the construction or on-going maintenance costs, to the satisfaction of City Solicitor and the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. Landscaping improvements for the current open space areas shown on Plan A3 and dated May 2, 2014, as revised, that will remain a part of the existing Brentwood Towers apartment complex rental property.
ii. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the owner shall provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and Tenant Communication Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner.
iii. The Owner provide, for tenants of the five rental buildings of the Brentwood Towers apartment complex a new walkway along a portion of an existing service roadway which provides one of the access points to surface visitor parking spaces, with improvements along the walkway including screened-in refuse containment structures, new apartment landscaped patios, new landscaped area, wall mounted security cameras and the relocation of 24 visitor surface parking spaces to the underutilized P1 level of the underground parking garage, all these improvements with no cost pass-through to the tenants of the Brentwood Towers apartment complex and to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner.
iv. The Owner shall be responsible for any expenses incurred for the removal of all the existing trees and removal/reconditioning of the redesigned water feature as well as all waterproofing and concrete repair work required to be undertaken with respect to the amenity areas and underground parking garage for 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard site with no cost pass-through to the tenants of the Brentwood Towers apartment complex.
v. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the townhouse development on the lot, the Owner will construct the proposed 164 square metre, below-grade amenity space, located 22 metres from the subject site, for use and enjoyment of the tenants of all five rental buildings of the Brentwood Towers apartment complex, with no cost-pass through to the tenants, and with the finishings and furnishings, and related security lighting and cameras, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner.
4. Before introducing the necessary bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a secured Agreement with the City to ensure the provision of all necessary improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure in connection with the revised Functional Servicing Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit 10 three-storey townhouses between Brentdale Drive and Kilbarry Road, fronting on the east side of Lascelles Boulevard, at 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard.
This proposed townhouse infill project is not permitted by the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86. Amendments to density and setback provisions are needed for both the proposed townhouses and the three existing apartment buildings on the site.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 17, 23 and 25 Lascelles Boulevard - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72185.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| John Plumabore |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (November 3, 2012) E-mail from Cecily Galt Savoie (TE.Supp.TE34.19.1)
|
| TE34.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Final Report - 183-195 Roehampton Avenue and 139-145 Redpath Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667 |
| Bill 1021 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 183-195 Roehampton Avenue and 139-145 Redpath Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (July 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands to secure the facilities, services and matters as follows:
a. The community benefits to be provided and secured at the owner's sole expense in the Section 37 Agreement are in a form satisfactory to the City with conditions providing for no credit for development charges, indexing escalation of both the financial contributions and letters of credit, indemnity, insurance, GST, termination and unwinding and registration and priority of the agreement, as follows:
i. contributions in the amount of $1,400,000.00 payable prior to the first above-grade building permit to be applied as directed by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the Ward Councillor, in accordance with the following or towards other local area park or streetscape improvements to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:
1. $700,000.00 to be used for improvements to Redpath Avenue Parkette and/or other local parks or for the acquisition, design and construction of new parkland to be added to Redpath Avenue Parkette or the development of other parks within the area; and
2. $700,000.00 for public art to be designed and constructed on the site at 183-195 Roehampton Avenue and 139-145 Redpath Avenue in accordance with the 'Percent for Public Art Program and Guidelines.'
Such total amount is to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner and the City may modify or amend the said agreement(s), from time to time and upon the consent of the City and the owner, without further amendment to those provisions of this zoning by-law which identify the facilities, services and matters to be secured.
4. City Council require the owner to enter into a financially secured right-of-way permit with the City, for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the Site Servicing Review and Traffic Impact Study accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
5. City Council require that the tree replacement requirement for the significant canopy grouping of Norway Maples is to be a ratio of 6:1 (78) 70 mm caliper trees to be planted to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
6. City Council approve the application to demolish the 5 existing rental units located at 143 Redpath Avenue and 183, 185, 189 and 195 Roehampton Avenue pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the existing residential rental units after the latest of the following has occurred:
a. the zoning by-law amendment in Recommendation 1. has come into full force and effect; or
b. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
8. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7. for the existing rental housing buildings.
9. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the 5 residential rental buildings and the remaining 6 residential buildings no earlier than the issuance of a building permit for the shoring and excavation for the development on the lands, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation No. 5 which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to redevelop the site at 183-195 Roehampton Avenue and 139-145 Redpath Avenue to construct a 34-storey, 113.5 metre (not including the mechanical penthouse) apartment building comprised of a 28-storey tower on top of a 6-storey base/podium. The proposed development has 446 residential units and 183 parking spaces including 3 car-share spaces in a 3-level underground garage. The proposed density is 10.8 times the lot area.
The site currently consists of an assembly of 3 detached and 8 semi-detached house form buildings located at 183-195 Roehampton Avenue and 139-145 Redpath Avenue with a total of 14 dwelling units containing 5 rental units. A Rental Housing Demolition application was also submitted for the 5 existing residential rental units.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the rental housing demolition application under Municipal Code 667 and the application to amend of the Zoning By-law based on its planning and design merits that include:
a. the site is located at the intersection of Roehampton and Redpath Avenues within an Apartment Neighbourhood and an Urban Growth Centre. Appropriate compatible apartment infill or redevelopment is anticipated by the Official Plan at this location;
b. the proposed residential units are within walking distance of retail shops, services, entertainment and places of employment;
c. the proposed building is within walking distance of the Yonge-Eglinton subway station and the proposed Mount Pleasant station of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT (under construction);
d. the proposed tall building is in an area that is characterized by tall buildings of varying heights;
e. the development includes hard and soft landscaping on the site and within the public boulevard, and public art which is to be fully visible to the street(s);
f. the development includes a café/coffee shop and a retail store as a continuation of the local-scaled retail on Redpath Avenue to the south of the site. Such 'local-scaled' retail would promote the creation of Redpath Avenue as a "shared street" as recommended in the Midtown in Focus Study;
g. the development proposes privately owned but publicly accessible outdoor seating and child-friendly open space adjacent to the proposed café/coffee shop at the Redpath Avenue frontage;
h. the proposed building will not unduly shadow existing Neighbourhoods buildings and open spaces; and
i. Section 37 benefits secured as a result of approval of this development would include improvements to local parks; acquisition, design and construction of new local parklands; and public art to be located on the site. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Final Report - 183 -195 Roehampton Avenue and 139 - 145 Redpath Avenue, Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71544.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Caroline Cavelti |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Peter Cavelti, Cavelti & Associates Ltd. (TE.Supp.TE34.20.1)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Mary Marshall-Mahlalela, attaching a petition signed by approximately 37 individuals in opposition (TE.Supp.TE34.20.2) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Mark Thompson (TE.Supp.TE34.20.3) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Mallory Thao (TE.Supp.TE34.20.4) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from David Goldband (TE.Supp.TE34.20.5) |
| TE34.21 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Final Report - 31 Roehampton Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 |
| Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish the existing building at 31 Roehampton Avenue that includes 35 residential rental dwelling units pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for replacement of the rental housing units:
a. That Council direct staff to request that the Committee of Adjustment incorporate the conditions of 1(b) i-iv (below) into any approvals for changes to the existing zoning for 8-10 Eglinton Ave East., 2263-2267 Yonge Street, and 25-31 Roehampton Avenue.
b. That the Owner enter into an Agreement(s) to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor with such agreements to be registered on title to the lands to secure the facilities, services and matters as follows:
i. provision and maintenance of not less than 35 new replacement rental dwelling units on the lot, with rents not higher than mid-range rents, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, subject to the following:
a. The replacement rental dwelling units shall comprise 10 bachelor, 23 one-bedroom units, and 2 two-bedroom units; and the combined floor area of the 35 replacement rental dwelling units shall be not less than 18,366 square feet (99% of existing gross floor area).
b. Each rental dwelling unit shall have a storage locker.
c. There shall be 4 accessible units.
d. The dwelling units shall have a range of sizes as per the following list:
- 10 Bachelor units with a minimum of 460 sq ft, of which 3 units shall be larger than 500 sq ft, and 3 shall be larger than 700 sq ft.;
- 23 One-bedroom units which shall be larger than 460 sq ft, of which 1 shall be larger than 600 sq ft and 21 shall be larger than 725 sq ft.; and
- 2 Two-bedroom units with a minimum of 677 sq ft;
ii. the replacement rental dwelling units shall be maintained as rental housing units for at least 20 years, beginning with the date each unit is occupied and until the owner obtains approval for a zoning by-law amendment removing the requirement for the replacement rental housing units to be maintained as rental units. No application may be submitted for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to non-rental housing purposes, or for demolition without providing for replacement dwelling units during the 20-year period;
iii. the building permit which provides for the replacement rental dwelling units shall be issued no later than the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any building with residential uses on the lot. The 35 replacement rental dwelling units shall be ready for occupancy no later than the date by which no more than 90% of the other dwelling units contained within the same building are available and ready for occupancy;
iv. provision and maintenance of rents no greater than mid-range rents charged to the tenants who rent each of the designated 35 replacement rental dwelling units during the first 10 years of occupancy, such that the initial rent shall not exceed an amount based on one and a half times (1.5x) the most recent Fall Update Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type inclusive of basic utility costs.
Upon turnover, the rent charged to any new tenant shall not exceed the greater of the most recently charged rent or one and a half times (1.5x) the most recent Fall Update Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type, and over the course of the 10 year period, annual increases shall not exceed the Provincial rental guideline and, if applicable, permitted above-guideline increases;
v. rents charged to tenants occupying a replacement rental dwelling unit at the end of the 10-year period set forth in 1b.iv shall be subject only to increases which do not exceed the Provincial rent guideline and, if applicable, permitted above guideline increases, so long as they continue to occupy their dwelling unit or until the expiry of the rental tenure period set forth in 1.b.iv. with a phase-in period of at least three years to unrestricted rents;
vi. rents charged to tenants newly occupying a replacement rental dwelling unit after the completion of the 10-year period set forth in 1.b..iv will not be subject to restrictions by the City of Toronto under the terms of the Agreement; and
vii. the owner shall provide and implement a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, that requires the owner to provide for each eligible tenant at 31 Roehampton Avenue the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, assistance that includes at least a moving allowance and other financial assistance geared to the affordability gap between the current rent and local area rent by unit type, with provisions for special needs tenants.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner and the City may modify or amend the said Agreement(s), from time to time and upon the consent of the City and the owner, without further amendment to those provisions of the zoning by-law which identify the facilities, services and matters to be secured provided that:
a. the owner shall obtain the necessary approvals from the Committee of Adjustment to facilitate the development of a building on the lot that can accommodate the rental replacement units and all required shared facilities;
b. the owner shall obtain a building permit which provides for the replacement rental dwelling units no later than the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any building with residential uses on the lot;
c. the owner shall enter into, and register on title, one or more Section 111 Agreement and/or Section 45 Agreement to secure the conditions outlined in (a) to (c) herein and as further detailed in site-specific zoning By-law1109-2013, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division and the City Solicitor; and
d. the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate (to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of lands).
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the existing residential rental housing building after all of the following has occurred:
a. the conditions in Recommendation 1 have been satisfied;
b. the necessary minor variances to site-specific zoning by law 1109-2013 are in force and effect; and
c. the reissuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 2 for the existing rental housing building.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the residential rental building no earlier than the date that the owner has submitted an application for a building permit for the shoring and excavation for the lands on which the existing rental building is situated, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 2 which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:
a. the owner erect a residential building on the site no later than five (5) years from the date the permit is issued for demolition of the buildings; and
b. should the owner fail to complete the new residential building to accommodate the replacement rental dwelling units within the time specified in condition 4 (a), the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector's roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application is to demolish a 3-storey walk-up apartment building containing 35 residential rental units at 31 Roehampton Avenue, under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act.
The 35 rental units are to be replaced within a proposed new building on the lands at 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue and at 31 Roehampton Avenue. The property at 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue is part of a previous (2013) Council approval of an application for the rezoning and demolition and replacement of 30 rental housing units for the "e-condos" site located at 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East and 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue.
In addition to the rental housing demolition application, the proposed new building at 25-31 Roehampton Avenue has been redesigned and will require approval by the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances to the site specific by-law (1109-2013).
The proposal is to demolish the 3-storey, rental apartment building at 31 Roehampton Avenue that has 10 bachelor units, 23 one bedroom units and 2 two bedroom units of mid-range rents. The applicant would replace all of these units by size, type, number and approximate rent levels in a proposed 34-storey apartment building (down from the 36 storeys previously approved by Council) with 465 units at 25 to 31 Roehampton Avenue. The applicant has also proposed tenant relocation assistance and will secure the right of tenants to return.
When there are six or more residential units and any of them are rental, the demolition of residential rental housing is prohibited under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code unless a Section 111 permit has been issued.
This report recommends the issuance of a Section 111 permit for the demolition of the 35 residential rental units at 31 Roehampton Avenue subject to the replacement of those units in the redesigned residential building at 25-31 Roehampton Avenue and the approval of proposed minor variances that will be before the Committee of Adjustment. If approved by Council, the demolition and replacement of these 35 rental units would be in addition to the previously approved demolition and replacement of 30 rental units at 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue. A total of 65 rental replacement units would be provided in the redesigned building.
The tower on the south portion of the overall development site is not proposed to change. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 31 Roehampton Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71662.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 1, 2014) E-mail from Anusha and Suppiah Kandiah (TE.Supp.TE34.21.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Killeen (TE.Supp.TE34.21.2) |
| TE34.22 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 50 Bloor Street West - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 50 Bloor Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. An indexed contribution of $6,000,000 to be paid or secured at the times noted in each of the sections below in the Section 37 Agreement. The total amounts are indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment and is detailed as follows:
1. An indexed cash contribution of $900,000 towards Yorkville Avenue streetscape improvements, to be paid in accordance with the following schedule:
a. $312,500 to be paid the later of 30 days from the site specific zoning by-law coming into full force and effect, or January 15, 2015;
b. $312,500 to be paid the earlier of the third anniversary of the date on which the site specific zoning by-law comes into full force and effect, or immediately preceding the issuance of the first building permit; and
c. $275,000 to be paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit.
2. An indexed cash contribution of $525,000, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit, towards capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing in Ward 27, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
3. An indexed cash contribution of $3,825,000, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit, towards streetscape and park improvements in the local area, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. $750,000 towards public art on site, in accordance with the City of Toronto Public Art Program.
5. In the event the cash contributions referred to above have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
4. City Council direct that a working group be formed by the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant and its tenant Holt Renfrew, the Greater Yorkville Residents Association and the ABC Residents Association and their memberships, the Bloor Yorkville Business Improvement Area, the Yonge-Bay-Bloor Business Association, adjacent property owners, and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan and construction management plan in co-ordination with applications in the Yorkville-East of Bay area, by the end of the first quarter of 2015. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 71-storey mixed-use building (218 metres plus a 12-metre mechanical penthouse totalling 230 metres). The proposal entails an 8-storey retail/office base building and a 63-storey residential tower, with a total gross floor area of 101,232 square metres and 600 residential units. It has 621 vehicle parking spaces (386 for residents, 25 for residential visitors, 186 for retail use and 24 for office use) plus 292 bicycle parking spaces.
The proposed development is consistent with all relevant policies of the Official Plan as well as the Bloor-Yorkville/North Midtown Urban Design Guidelines and provides two pedestrian mid-block connections.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Two other staff reports relevant to the review of this application regarding the Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework and a development application at a site at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street, will also be before Toronto and East York Community Council at its August 12, 2014 meeting. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 50 Bloor Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72184.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| John Caliendo, ABC Residents' Association |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 10, 2014) Letter from Stanley Shenkman (TE.Supp.TE34.22.1)
|
| TE34.23 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 50-60 and 62-64 Charles Street East and 47 and 61 Hayden Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bills 1031 and 1032 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 50-60, 62 and 64 Charles Street East, and 47 and 61 Hayden Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 10 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
A. Subsection 3(f) be amended to read as follows:
"(f) Medical offices shall not exceed forty percent of the total non-residential gross floor area on the lot.";
B. Subsection 3(j)(B)(i) to (v) with respect to parking standards for residential uses be amended to read as follows:
(i) a minimum of 0.19 parking spaces per bachelor dwelling unit;
(ii) a minimum of 0.31 parking spaces per one bedroom dwelling unit;
(iii) a minimum of 0.47 parking spaces per two bedroom dwelling unit;
(iv) a minimum of 0.74 parking spaces per dwelling unit containing three or more bedrooms;
(v) provided further that a reduction of 5 resident parking spaces will be permitted for each car-share parking space to a maximum of 10 car- share parking spaces provided that the maximum reduction permitted by this means be capped by the application of the following formula:
5 x (Total No. of residential units ÷ 60), rounded down to the nearest whole number.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 50-60, 62, and 64 Charles Street East, and 47 and 61 Hayden Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 11 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
A. Section 3(A)(vi) be amended to read as follows:
(vi) Medical offices shall not exceed forty percent of the total non-residential gross floor area on the lot.
B. Section 3(A)(vii)(b) through (f), under the heading "Residential", be amended to read as follows:
(b) a minimum of 0.19 parking spaces per bachelor dwelling unit;
(c) a minimum of 0.31 parking spaces per one bedroom dwelling unit;
(d) a minimum of 0.47 parking spaces per two bedroom dwelling unit;
(e) a minimum of 0.74 parking spaces per dwelling unit containing three or more bedrooms;
(f) provided further that a reduction of 5 resident parking spaces will be permitted for each car-share parking space to a maximum of 10 car- share parking spaces provided that the maximum reduction permitted by this means be capped by the application of the following formula:
5 x (Total No. of residential units ÷ 60), rounded down to the nearest whole number.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. Before introducing the Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendments to City Council for enactment, the owner shall:
a. Provide a Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 62 and 64 Charles Street East prepared by ERA Architects dated July 30, 2013 (addendum April 28, 2014), to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendments to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into one or more Agreements with the City, satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be provided by and at the Owner's expense and secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
Prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit the owner shall provide the following cash contributions:
i. $400,000 towards the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of maintaining and constructing affordable rental housing units in Ward 27, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the local Councillor.
ii. $1,000,000 for local area park and streetscape improvements in Ward 27, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the local Councillor. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement for the submission of a cash contribution, at the discretion of the City the owner may be required to submit a letter of credit in such amount as the City may require for the streetscape improvements component of this contribution, in which case, the owner shall install such streetscape improvements to the satisfaction of the City and shall be entitled to release of its letter of credit.
iii. $2,600,000 towards the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for new affordable housing in Ward 27 and/or community, cultural and/or recreational space improvements in Ward 27, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the local Councillor.
iv. The payment amounts in Recommendation 5 in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, be increased by upwards indexing in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of final approval of the Bills to the date of each such payment to the City.
v. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section 5.a. (i), (ii) and (iii) in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. A privately owned publicly accessible (POPS) ground floor courtyard and a privately owned publicly accessible walkway connecting Charles Street East and Hayden Street, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor in consultation with the local Councillor.
ii. A pet care facility on site to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor in consultation with the local Councillor.
iii. A minimum 1.5 metre wide conveyance along the Hayden Street frontage to the City, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor.
iv. A minimum of 10% of the dwelling units in the development must be 3 bedrooms or 2+1 bedrooms with a minimum size of 83.61 square metres per dwelling unit.
v. The owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties located at 62 and 64 Charles Street East to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor by June 1, 2015.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment:
a. City Council require the Owner to obtain the necessary tree removal permits for all affected private and public trees proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Urban Forestry, Toronto and East York District, the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director.
b. Should it be determined by the Supervisor, Urban Forestry, Toronto and East York District, that certain private or public trees are required to be protected on or adjacent to the site, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, be requested to submit a report to City Council indicating the modifications required to the development proposal to protect the identified trees.
7. City Council direct that a working group be formed by the Director of Community Planning, Toronto East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, the Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association and the Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association and their memberships, adjacent property owners, and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan application and construction management plan. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes a 55-storey residential tower fronting on Charles Street East (172.1 metres in height excluding the mechanical penthouse, 179.6 metres including the mechanical penthouse) connected to an 8-storey (38 metre) office building with ground floor retail space fronting on Hayden Street. The development would have a total gross floor area of 48,094 square metres, with 38,454 square metres of residential floor area (626 dwelling units) and 9,640 square metres of non-residential floor area. A total of 198 automobile parking spaces and 660 bicycle parking spaces are provided. A privately owned publicly-accessible open space (POPS) and walkway is proposed.
The Zoning By-law Amendment would establish a Site Specific Zoning By law for the lands which includes provisions related to: heritage conservation for the properties located at 62-64 Charles Street East; maximum building height and storeys; maximum floor areas; minimum building setbacks; maximum number of dwelling units; minimum number of bicycle and vehicle parking spaces; minimum indoor and outdoor amenity space areas; permitted uses, among other details. Contributions under Section 37 of the Planning Act would also be secured.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The draft Zoning By-laws are to be distributed at the August 12, 2014 Toronto and East York Community Council Meeting. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 50-60 Charles Street East and 47 and 61 Hayden Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72234.pdf) Attachment 10 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Zoning By-law No. 438-86 - 50-60 Charles Street East and 47 and 61 Hayden Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72754.pdf) Attachment 11 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 - 50-60 Charles Street East and 47 and 61 Hayden Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72756.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Robert B. Statton (TE.Supp.TE34.23.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Walker Young (TE.Supp.TE34.23.2) (August 12, 2014) Letter from N. Jane Pepino, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE34.23.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49132.pdf) |
| TE34.24 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 62-64 Charles Street East (Thomas Smith/Arthur Coleman Houses) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 62 and 64 Charles Street East (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (June 19, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
2. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties. |
| Origin |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 62-64 Charles Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Located on the north side of Charles Street East, west of Church Street, the site contains a pair of semi-detached house form buildings (1884) that are listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
The owners have submitted an application to redevelop the site with the adjoining properties at 50 and 60 Charles Street East and 47 and 61 Hayter Street. The proposal does not impact the heritage buildings at 62-64 Charles Street East, apart from the removal of the rear (north) wings, which are not identified as heritage attributes.
The properties at 62-64 Charles Street West are being recommended for designation at this time to ensure that all of the heritage values and attributes of the site are identified and protected. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72347.pdf) Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72428.pdf) Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72429.pdf) Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72430.pdf) Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72431.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street Neighbourhood Association |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Robert B. Statton (TE.Supp.TE34.24.1)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Walker Young (TE.Supp.TE34.24.2) (August 12, 2014) Letter from N. Jane Pepino, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE34.24.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49275.pdf) |
| 24a | Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 19, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 62-64 Charles Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71850.pdf) |
| TE34.25 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - Davenport Terrace - City-Initiated Zoning Amendment |
| Bills 1024 and 1025 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 142-202 Davenport Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendment to the draft By-law:
"The combined residential gross floor area and non-residential gross floor area of a building may be reduced by a maximum of 50% of the floor area that is located below grade." 2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 142-202 Davenport Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendment to the draft By-law:
"In addition to the provisions of 40.5.40.40, the gross floor area of a building may be reduced by a maximum of 50% of the floor area of the basement and the floor space index of a building may be reduced by a maximum of 50% of the floor area of the basement divided by the area of the lot."
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report summarizes the review of development standards in the zoning by-law for the mixed-use area known as Davenport Terrace (municipally known as 142-202 Davenport Road), located on the north side of Davenport Road just east of Avenue Road, and provides a City-initiated Zoning By-law Amendment for the area.
The intent of the amendments to Zoning By-law 438-86 and Zoning By-law 569-2013 is to regulate the transition of built form between Davenport Terrace and the adjacent Neighbourhood to the north, located at a considerably lower elevation, and to preserve the house form character along this portion of Davenport Road.
This report recommends approval of the City-initiated amendment to Zoning By-law 438-86 and By-law 569-2013 (refer to Attachment Nos. 1 and 2). |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Davenport Terrace - City-Initiated Zoning Amendment - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72133.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Robert Fuller, President, MTCC 795 Dakota |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Don Milne (TE.Supp.TE34.25.1)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Rachel Rafelman (TE.Supp.TE34.25.2) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Khash Khalili, Vice President, Mizrahi Developments (TE.Supp.TE34.25.3) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Barry Brooker and Jane Ormiston (TE.Supp.TE34.25.4) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mary Helen Spence (TE.Supp.TE34.25.5) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Robert Fuller, President, MTCC 795, known as the DAKOTA (TE.Supp.TE34.25.6) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Bill Peers (TE.Supp.TE34.25.7) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Michael Killinger and Mike Jackson (TE.Supp.TE34.25.8) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Joan M. Boggs (TE.Supp.TE34.25.9) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Phyllis Bruce and Gotham Clements (TE.Supp.TE34.25.10) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Bettina Basrani and Howard Alter (TE.Supp.TE34.25.11) |
| TE34.26 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report |
| Bill 1017 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 640-2002, as amended, for the lands at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (July 16, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendment:
"(5) Section 1 is amended by adding subsection 1(9) to read:
(9)(i) No more than one trash compactor or other form of equipment associated with the outside storage of waste or recyclable material shall be permitted on the West Campus as shown an Plan 1A and it must be located within the area defined by the north-east boundary of the building known as 6 Elm Avenue to a distance of 12.25 metres north towards the property at 120 Mt. Pleasant Road and within a distance of 26.55 metres from the lot line abutting Mt. Pleasant Road.
(ii) No trash compactor or other form of equipment associated with the outside storage of waste or recyclable material, other than that permitted by 1(9)(i) shall be permitted within the outdoor area on the north side of the building known as 6 Elm Avenue and to the lot line abutting the properties at 10, 12, 14, 18 and 20 Meredith Crescent as shown on Diagram 1A, submitted by Councillor Wong-Tam.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (July 16, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council, City Council require the Owner to undertake in writing that upon the Zoning By-law becoming final and binding, that the Owner will withdraw their appeal of the lands subject to the City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
5. City Council direct that a working group be formed in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, representatives of the South Rosedale Residents Association and its membership, City Planning and other appropriate staff, to review the design and technical matters related to the servicing and loading uses for the driveways of 6 Elm Avenue and 120 Mt. Pleasant Road on Branksome Hall's West Campus. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 640-2002 and Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, and By-law 569-2013 respecting the West Campus of Branksome Hall at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 Elm Avenue in order to include two additional properties at 120 Mt. Pleasant Road and the former Elm Avenue. The proposed amendment will facilitate an improved loading area and the consolidation of waste collection at 6 Elm Avenue with the adjacent property at 120 Mt. Pleasant Road and the former Elm Avenue within the West Campus. All of the properties at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue are owned by Branksome Hall.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72134.pdf) Diagram 1 - Submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale - 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14 and 16 Elm Avenue, 120 and 125 Mt. Pleasant Road, and the former Elm Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72846.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Alex Murray, South Rosedale Residents Association |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Submission from Alex Murray, Vice President, South Rosedale Residents' Association (TE.Supp.TE34.26.1)
(August 12, 2014) Submission from Jacqueline Elton (TE.Supp.TE34.26.2) |
| TE34.27 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 186 and 188 Jarvis Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1020 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 186 and 188 Jarvis Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report (July 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
i. Amend the "THEREFORE" recital on page 1 of the draft by-law by deleting "Section 1" and replacing it with "Sections 1, 2 and 3".
ii. Change the number "5.5" along the southern boundary of the lot shown on Map 2 of the draft by-law to the number "9.1".
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as identified below, and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made:
i. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $145,200 toward capital improvements for properties owned by Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
ii. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $250,000 toward offsite local City-owned laneway improvements to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
iii. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $250,000 for local parklands and streetscape improvements to the satisfaction the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
iv. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $806,800 toward the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of constructing new affordable rental housing units in Ward 27, and/or toward community/cultural/recreational space improvements in the local area to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
b. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 3 a. i., ii., iii., and iv. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
c. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, including shoring and excavation, the owner shall have obtained title to the lands shown on Attachment 5, Map 1 as “Lane to be Purchased by Applicant”.
ii. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, including shoring and excavation, the owner shall have conveyed at no cost to the City a stratified overland flow stormwater easement, satisfactory to the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services in consultation with the City Solicitor, such easement to be in the location shown as "Proposed Easement Below" on Attachment 1, to be in compliance with the accepted design drawings in paragraph (iii) below and to include terms whereby the owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the overland flow corridor and shall insure and indemnify the City.
iii. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, including shoring and excavation, the owner shall have submitted detailed design drawings showing the overland flow route corridor and patterns from the public east-west laneway to the overland flow route corridor to the satisfaction of the City’s Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
iv. Submission of a Construction Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site, including shoring and excavation.
v. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.
4. City Council direct that a working group be formed by the Director of Community Planning, Toronto East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, the Garden District Residents Association and its membership, adjacent property owners, and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan application and construction management plan, once they are submitted. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report recommends approval of a private 30-storey student residence for the benefit of Ryerson University. The project is proposed to contain 191 units (593 beds) with commercial uses on the ground floor on lands municipally known as 186 to 188 Jarvis Street, and a City-owned laneway. The City-owned laneway will need to be deemed surplus and purchased by the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permit.
Contributions under Section 37 of the Planning Act will be secured including cash contributions for: capital improvements towards Toronto Community Housing properties; local City-owned laneways, parklands, and streetscape improvements; construction of affordable housing; and community/cultural/recreational space improvements in the local area.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 186 and 188 Jarvis Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71672.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| John Austin, Executive Director, Student Affairs, Ryerson University |
| TE34.28 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 70 St Mary Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 40-storey mixed-use building at 70 St. Mary Street with residential and institutional uses, as shown on the plans received by the City Planning Division on April 23, 2014.
2. City Council amend the University of Toronto Secondary Plan for the lands at 70 St. Mary Street to establish a Site Specific Policy that would permit a 40-storey mixed-used building with residential and institutional uses and request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to forward the necessary Bill to City Council for adoption.
3. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 70 St. Mary Street to permit a 40-storey mixed-used residential and institutional building and request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to forward the necessary Bill to City Council for adoption.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into one or more Agreements with the City, satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be provided by and at the Owner's expense and secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit the owner shall provide the following cash contributions:
i. $220,000 towards the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing for the purpose of maintaining and constructing affordable rental housing units, including Toronto Community Housing buildings, in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
ii. $1,000,000 for local area park and streetscape improvements in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
iii. $980,000 for social and community space purposes in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
iv. The payment amounts in Recommendation 4 in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, be increased by upwards indexing in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of final approval of the bills to the date of each such payment to the City.
v. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section 4.a.i, ii, and iii. in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. A privately owned publicly accessible (POPS) ground floor courtyard on the site adjacent to St. Mary Street, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
ii. A minimum of 10% of the dwelling units in the development must be 3 bedroom dwelling units.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment:
a. City Council require the Owner to obtain the necessary tree removal permits for all affected private and public trees proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Urban Forestry, Toronto and East York District, the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director.
b. Should it be determined by the Supervisor, Urban Forestry, Toronto and East York District, that certain private or public trees are required to be protected on or adjacent to the site, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, be requested to submit a report to City Council indicating the modifications required to the development proposal to protect the identified trees.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a secured Agreement with the City, as may be required, to provide and pay for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure are required to support the development.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such steps as may be necessary to implement the foregoing.
8. City Council direct that a working group be formed in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, the Bay Cloverhill Community Association and its membership, adjacent property owners, and City Planning, and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan application and construction management plan once they are submitted. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend the University of Toronto Secondary Plan and amend the Zoning By-law to permit a new 40-storey mixed use building with residential uses and institutional uses for Loretto College. The proposal includes a chapel, meeting rooms and accessory office space, and a total of 298 residential units, including 220 residential condominium units, 70 student residence rooms and 8 suites for the College's Sisters. A total of 204 parking spaces are proposed in a three level underground parking garage. A privately owned publicly accessible (POPS) open space area is also being proposed along the St. Mary Street frontage. The existing building on the site is to be demolished.
This report reviews and recommends that the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications not be approved as submitted. It is recommended that the proposed tower portion be reduced to 30 storeys in height. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 70 St Mary Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72188.pdf) Attachment - Draft By-law Amending Official Plan - 70 St. Mary Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72807.pdf) Attachment - Draft By-law Amending Draft Zoning By-law - 70 St. Mary Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72833.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP |
| TE34.29 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1043 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (July 17, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
a. by deleing Section 3(i) of Attachment 8 and replacing it with the following:
"3(i) A minimum of 378 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the site in accordance with the following:
290 parking spaces for the use of residents of the mixed-use building;
88 parking spaces, which may be provided in a commercial parking garage, to serve visitors to the dwelling units and the non-residential uses in the mixed-use building;
Provided further that:
A reduction of four resident parking spaces will be permitted for each car-share parking space provided on the site and that the maximum reduction permitted by this means be capped by the application of the following formula:
4 x (Total No. of Units ÷ 60), rounded down to the nearest whole number."
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. The owner shall internalize the TTC Staircase at the northeast corner of University Avenue and Dundas Street West to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission.
ii. The owner shall design and construct a pedestrian promenade along Dundas Street West to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including:
a. public art and public realm improvements to the pedestrian promenade through a design and implementation process satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director; and
b. the provision of a public easement in favour of the City for pedestrians along the Dundas Street West Promenade frontage, with the owner's covenant to indemnify the City of Toronto in respect to the Pedestrian Promenade.
iii. The owner shall retain and restore the primary University Avenue and Dundas Street West elevations of the office building at 481 University Avenue and printing plant at 210 Dundas Street West in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment revised September 6, 2013 prepared by ERA Architects Inc.
iv. The estimated value of the foregoing work is a minimum of $7,000,000.00. A cost estimate for items "ii" and "iii" will be submitted to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council direct that a working group be formed by the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, area residents and stakeholders, adjacent property owners, and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan application and construction management plan, once they are submitted |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to construct a 55-storey residential tower including a 10-storey commercial office/retail base at 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street.
City Staff worked closely with the applicant prior to submission and during the rezoning application to address issues of height and setback and secure improvements to the public realm. City Staff have completed a review of the proposal and find that the application represents a substantial improvement to the existing public realm and adds to a growing residential community at Dundas Street West and University Avenue. Furthermore, the application retains, intact, an important heritage building at 481 University, internalizes the TTC staircase at Dundas Street West and University Avenue and substantially achieves the recommendations of the Tall Building Guidelines as well as applicable Provincial and Municipal Policy.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72125.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Frank Lewinberg, Partner, Urban Strategies |
| TE34.30 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 481 University Avenue and 210 Dundas Street West in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 55-storey residential tower including a 10-storey commercial office/retail base provided that 481 University Avenue and 210 Dundas Street West are designated and subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City, with such alterations to the properties to be substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated February 12, 2013 and revised September 6, 2013, and the drawings prepared by B+H Architects dated February 12, 2013 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:
a. That the related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for the Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:
i. Complete and register a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, requiring, inter alia, that:
a. provided the property at 481 University and 210 Dundas Street West is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act prior to the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for the proposed development, then prior to final Site Plan approval the Owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement generally in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated February 12, 2013, and revised September 6, 2013; and
b. the Owner shall not object to the designation of said property as recommended in the Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to the Toronto Preservation Board and Toronto East York Community Council dated June 26, 2014.
c. That prior to Site Plan Approval for the property at 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street the owner shall:
i. Provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the properties located at 481 University Avenue and 210 Dundas Street West dated February 12, 2013 and revised September 6, 2013, and includes a removal, storage, relocation and restoration plan for the Elizabeth Wyn Wood bas-reliefs to be prepared by a qualified art conservator with a specialization in bas relief sculpture, and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Complete all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. Provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 481 University and 210 Dundas Street West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:
i. Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the properties at 481 University and 210 Dundas Street West, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Have obtained Final Site Plan approval for such property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
iii. Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect, a qualified heritage consultant and a qualified art conservator, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iv. Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the Maclean Publishing Company Building and the Maclean-Hunter Building will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
v. Provide an Interpretation Plan for 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
vi. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, including work related to the relocation and restoration of the Elizabeth Wyn Wood bas-reliefs and the approved Interpretation Plan.
e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:
i. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 481 University Avenue with the Maclean-Hunter Building (1961) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 481 University Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 14 to the report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
3. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 481 University Avenue (the part known as 210 Dundas Street West with the Maclean Publishing Company Building (1928) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 481 University Avenue (210 Dundas Street West: Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 15 to the report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
4. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
5. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.
6. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Planner, or Chief Planner's designate, to enter into a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 481 University Avenue in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and City Solicitor. |
| Origin |
| (June 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the heritage properties located at 481 University Avenue and 210 Dundas Street West in connection with the proposed redevelopment of 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street which proposes to construct a 55-storey residential tower including a 10-storey commercial office/retail base.
Should Council endorse this strategy staff recommend that a Heritage Easement Agreement be entered into and registered with the City and that staff be authorized to take the necessary steps to ensure the long-term protection of the Maclean Publishing Company Building and the Maclean-Hunter Building. The buildings at 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street are proposed to be demolished as part of the development.
The report also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 481 University Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with the designation applied to the west end of the site where the Maclean-Hunter Building (1961) is situated, as well as the northwest corner of Dundas Street West and Centre Avenue, which is known as 210 Dundas Street West and contains the Maclean Publishing Company Building (1928). |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71593.pdf) Attachments 1-3 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71594.pdf) Attachments 4-6 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71595.pdf) Attachments 7-9 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71596.pdf) Attachments 10-13 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71597.pdf) Attachments 14 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71598.pdf) Attachments 15 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71599.pdf) Attachments 16 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71600.pdf) Attachments 17 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71601.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Frank Lewinberg, Partner, Urban Strategies |
| 30a | Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West) |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement – 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West).
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 481 University Avenue (Including 210 Dundas Street West)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71843.pdf) |
| TE34.31 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bills 1055 and 1056 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street, and lands on the east side of St. Luke Lane, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendment:
a. deleting Section 5(l)(iii) and by amending Section 5(m) of the draft by-law to reflect parking space dimensions of 2.6 metres by 5.2 metres accessed from 7.0 metre wide drive aisles in order to meet Toronto Parking Authority requirements and the lands identified as Areas "A" and "B" shall be used for no purpose other than public parks and recreation.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands on the east side of St. Luke Lane, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into one or more Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following at the owner’s sole expense all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of Planning in consultation with appropriate civic officials and the Ward Councillor:
i. Enter into an agreement at the expense of the Owner to secure the following as Section 37 facilities, services and matters:
a. The provision of a $1,000,000.00 contribution by the Owner at the time of first above grade building permit, indexed, toward public art in accordance with the Public Art Program to be used on the site or in the adjacent parkland, in full replacement of the owner’s public art obligations for Phases V and VI of the 1999 Section 37 Agreement.
b. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, including shoring and excavation, the owner shall enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale, to be assigned to any successor in title, whereby it shall prior to the earlier of the completion of Base Park Improvements and December 31, 2050, convey to the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor a stratified parcel for park purposes consisting of lands of approximately 2,040 sq.m. to be purchased by the City.
c. The Owner shall agree that:
i. the Owner shall ensure that prior to the earlier of: first residential occupancy; first residential condominium registration; or a later date to the satisfaction of the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Owner of the site at their cost, shall convey to the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor a stratified parcel for park purposes consisting of lands of approximately 4,074 sq.m. to be conveyed at no cost (which include lands currently held in escrow from the 1999 Section 37 Agreement for the block; lands the City is receiving in exchange for lands the City is giving up to facilitate the new driveway configuration; the present Section 37 contribution for 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street lands; and the lands to be dedicated for parkland purposes from 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street, and the lands at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street and the lands at 957-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West, together with lands which also allow the owner of the site at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street to satisfy its obligation to pay $500,000.00 towards parkland acquisition and for park improvements in the area). The owner acknowledges that, if the conveyance otherwise required to be dedicated to the City in connection with the development of the building at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act has not occurred prior to issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall be required to post a Letter of Credit as security for same.
ii. provided that in the event the owner does not obtain the consent and agreement of the owners of the lands to the west to the proposed driveway modification and associated land exchanges, the Owner shall not be required to convey, or arrange for the conveyance, of such lands as require that consent and agreement.
iii. the above conveyances to the City shall be subject to a 15 metre limiting distance restriction from the face of the proposed building, without compensation to the City.
iv. in the event the City obtains title to any such lands prior to the completion of the construction of the building, the City shall permit the owner to occupy the lands for construction and staging purposes at no cost, subject to the standard park occupancy permit.
d. The above conveyances shall be subject to the following:
i. prior to issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall submit an initial design and cost estimate for the Above Base Park Improvements to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Following submission of said design and cost estimate the Owner shall enter into a park design consultation process to finalize the design for approval by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The final design shall be approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, within 8 months following issuance of the first above grade building permit.
ii. provided the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation has approved the final design and cost estimate at least 12 months earlier, the owner shall construct the Above Base Park Improvements at its expense in accordance with the approved plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation prior to the earlier of first residential occupancy and residential condominium registration or at a later date as may be approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
iii. prior to commencing construction of the above base park improvements, the Owner shall post an irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of 100% of the value of the approved estimate of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, with the understanding that the cost shall not exceed the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the site at 5-25 Wellesley Street West and 14-26 Breadalbane Street, the site at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West, and the site at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street. (Upon posting such letters of credit, any Letters of Credit previously posted to secure the payment of the park component of Development Charges for above sites shall be returned.).
iv. all conveyances to the City, including easements. (except for the lands to be purchased) shall be for nominal consideration at the owner’s expense and at no cost to the City on terms and conditions as set out in the Section 37 Agreement, including provision for: deposit of reference plans: environmental obligations including peer review; as well as insurance and indemnification, with such conveyances to be free and clear of encumbrances (with support easement for any component above the underground parking garage) to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
v. if the consent of the abutting properties to the west of the site is obtained, the owner shall agree to such land exchange as is required by the Chief Planner to permit the revised driveway and loading lane and the Owner shall pay the costs of reconstructing the driveway.
vi. the owner shall agree to such modifications to the existing 1999 Section 37 Agreement as are determined to be appropriate by the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner, to permit the development of the its lands to proceed in accordance with the new zoning by-law.
ii. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience prior to the issuance of site plan approval to support development all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of Planning in consultation with the appropriate civic officials and the Ward Councillor:
a. the wind mitigation measures listed in the submitted Wind Study shall be implemented to ensure that the wind effects are acceptable.
b. at least 10% of all total dwelling units erected or used on the lot shall have two or more bedrooms and at least 7% of the units shall have at least three or more bedrooms with a minimum size of 80 sq.m. per three bedroom unit in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code.
c. require the Owner to address the comments from Engineering and Construction in their memo dated June 3, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services in consultation with appropriate civic officials.
d. require the Owner to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to infrastructure are required to support the development.
e. require the Owner to design and construct upgraded streetscape for Wellesley Street West along the frontage of the site, including the residential and park portion of the site, to include, upgraded pavement treatment and landscaping to be secured through the site plan process.
f. require the Owner to design and construct an upgraded streetscape for St. Luke Lane from Wellesley Street West to Breadalbane Street including along the frontage of the site providing a pedestrian walkway, upgraded pavement treatment and landscaping to be secured through the site plan process.
g. require the Owner to provide all ramp slopes in accordance with By-law 438-86 and provide the transition areas at the top and bottom of the ramps leading to the individual parking levels with maximum slope of 7.5% over a minimum distance of 3 metres and where a ramp begins at or near a property line, it must have a maximum slope of 5% over a minimum distance of 6 metres.
h. require the Owner to convey to the City, at nominal cost, a 3 metre wide strip along Wellesley Street West and a stratified widening along the public lane abutting the site (St. Luke Lane) ranging from 1.5 to .9 metres in width such lands to be free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances, and subject to a right-of-way for access in favour of the Owner until such time as said lands have been laid out and dedicated for public highway purposes. all to the satisfaction to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services in consultation with the City Solicitor.
i. prior to the occupancy of the building, the Owner shall convey to the City an easement(s) for 24-hour public access to the pedestrian area over the setback area along the St. Luke Lane frontage, (the “City Easements”), for nominal consideration and to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and shall maintain this area free and clear of encumbrances for pedestrian use, in perpetuity, and shall pay all costs associated with the preparation and registration of all necessary documents and plans, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
j. as a condition of site plan approval and prior to the issuance of any permits require a detailed construction management plan for the site.
5. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to revise the Official Plan through the five year Official Plan review process to designate the additional parkland being provided on this site as “Parks”.
6. City Council require the owner to agree to withdraw their appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of Official Plan Amendment 183, the North Downtown Area Specific Policy 382 once the bills for the Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street are in full force and effect.
7. City Council authorize credits against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges payable for the design and construction of the above-base park improvements to be installed by the Owner; the credits shall be allowed against the Charges payable for the site at 5-25 Wellesley Street West and 14-26 Breadalbane Street, the site at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West. and the site at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street, as allocated and approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner of installing the above-base park improvements as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for these three developments.
8. City Council require that the associated Section 37 Agreement contain provisions which allow the subject site at 5-25 Wellesley Street West and 14-26 Breadalbane Street, the offsite lands at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley, and the off-site lands at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street to satisfy their respective Section 42 Park Land conveyance requirements by the parkland conveyances to be secured in respect of the development of the site at 5-25 Wellesley Street West and 14-26 Breadalbane Street; and which also allow the owner of the site at 501-521 Yonge Street and 6-8 Alexander Street and 23 Maitland Street to satisfy its obligation to pay $500,000.00 towards parkland acquisition and/or park improvements in the area as permitted by paragraph 2a of By-law No. 139-2014 and paragraph 2.3 of the associated Section 37 Agreement; and which also satisfy the obligations of the Owner with respect to the Phase VI Park Lands conveyances under the 1999 Section 37 Agreement and its obligations under Section 11.41 of the 1999 Section 37 Agreement.
9. City Council direct that the approvals for Zoning By-law Amendment 13 138607 STE 27 OZ for 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street be contingent on City Council approval of the report from General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to Executive Committee at their meeting of August 20, 2014, Adjustments to the 2014-2023 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to find the Acquisition of a portion of the parkland at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street.
10. City Council direct that a Working Group be formed by the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, the Bay Cloverhill Community Association and its membership, adjacent property owners, City Planning and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services, to review the site plan application and construction management plan, once they are submitted. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to redevelop the lands south of Wellesley Street West to Breadalbane Street, west of St. Luke Lane, with a mixed-use development. The proposal includes one 60-storey tower (194 metres including mechanical penthouse) located at the northeast corner of the site with 742 residential units, retail at grade and office uses on the second and third floor. The base of the tower is proposed to be 3 storeys (18.5 metres high), stepping up to 7 storeys (32 metres high) with the tower rising from the seventh storey. Amenity space (internal and external) is proposed on the fourth and fifth floors. The sixth and seventh floor is proposed as residential. Access to below-grade parking and loading is proposed from St. Luke Lane. A commercial parking facility is also proposed below grade. A significant addition to the existing adjacent public open space will be achieved through this proposal with the addition of a park space of approximately 0.538 ha. Section 37 contributions have been secured for public art, park acquisition and park improvements.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment subject to some minor revisions to the provision of parking in accordance with the requirements as set out in this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72127.pdf) Attachment 8 - Draft Zoning By-law - 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72682.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Kathryn A. Holden (TE.Supp.TE34.31.1)
(July 18, 2014) Letter from Sana Kazani (TE.Supp.TE34.31.2) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Yousef Bayani (TE.Supp.TE34.31.3) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Jonathan and Adelaide Ng (TE.Supp.TE34.31.4) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Gee Chung, President, The Greater Yorkville Residents' Association (TE.Supp.TE34.31.5) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Warren Ho (TE.Supp.TE34.31.6) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Aileen M. Randell (TE.Supp.TE34.31.7) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Matthew Gillman (TE.Supp.TE34.31.8) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Khadijeh Nezam Mafi (TE.Supp.TE34.31.9) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Golbenaz Samsam Bakhtiari (TE.Supp.TE34.31.10) (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Narges Bayani (TE.Supp.TE34.31.11) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Kathryn Mills (TE.Supp.TE34.31.12) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Arianne M. Matte Scheide (TE.Supp.TE34.31.13) (August 10, 2014) E-mail from Paul Harrington (TE.Supp.TE34.31.14) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Marilyn Green (TE.Supp.TE34.31.15) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Niloufar Bayani (TE.Supp.TE34.31.16) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Naomi Cherow (TE.Supp.TE34.31.17) (August 7, 2014) Letter from Marilyn Tait McClellan (TE.Supp.TE34.31.18) (August 8, 2014) Letter from Mark Garner, Executive Director & Chief Staff Officer, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (TE.Supp.TE34.31.19) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Hodge MacEwen (TE.Supp.TE34.31.20) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Rick Moldovanyi (TE.Supp.TE34.31.21) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Cathy Carnevali (TE.Supp.TE34.31.22) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE34.31.23) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Andrew Horberry, President, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE34.31.24) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Erica Petkov (TE.Supp.TE34.31.25) (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mary Noonan (TE.Supp.TE34.31.26) |
| 31a | Supplementary Report - 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report provides further direction and revised Recommendations regarding the Parks and Open Space component of the development proposal as outlined in item TE34.31 Final Report – 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application Toronto and East York Community Council meeting of August 12, 2014. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72616.pdf) |
| TE34.32 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Final Report - 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32 and 50 Cumberland Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment |
| Communication TE34.32.3 has been submitted on this Item |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 12 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 13 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments to the draft by-law:
a. Delete 1(h)(i) to 1(h)(iv) and replace with the following:
“1(h)(i) a minimum of 0.3 residential parking spaces per dwelling unit;”.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required, including revisions which may be required to the Zoning By-law Amendment to address comments (from Development Engineering dated August 7, 2014) relating to driveway isle widths and slopes to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. an indexed contribution of $11,500,000 to be paid or secured at the times noted in each of the sections below in the Section 37 Agreement. The total amounts are indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment and is detailed as follows:
a. an indexed cash contribution of $1,500,000 towards improvements to community space at Jesse Ketchum School, as secured in an agreement between the City of Toronto and the Toronto District School Board, to be paid within 30 days of the site specific zoning by-law coming into full force and effect. If an agreement is not reached between the City of Toronto and the Toronto District School Board to the satisfaction of the local councillor, the cash contribution of $1,500,000 shall be used towards community, cultural, recreational services and facilities in Ward 27;
b. an indexed cash contribution of $3,500,000 towards new or existing community and/or cultural space, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit;
c. an indexed value of $850,000 towards public art on site (including the public open space), in accordance with the City of Toronto Public Art Program;
d. an indexed cash contribution of $4,500,000 towards streetscape and park improvements, including new parkland acquisitions in the local area to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit; and
e. an indexed cash contribution of $1,150,000 towards new or existing affordable housing including capital repairs of Toronto Community Housing in Ward 27, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit.
ii. In the event the cash contributions referred to above have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. the provision and design of a public park at grade (strata title), having a maximum size of 693 square metres, secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a means of legal convenience to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation in consultation with the local Councillor; and
ii. the public park in maintained by the owner at its expense in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation together with provisions for indemnification of the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in connection with maintenance and the stratification.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to obtain approval to close the public lane extending northerly from Cumberland Street and a portion of the east/west lane.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to submit a revised Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
7. City Council require the owner to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.
8. City Council accept the stratified conveyance of 583.5 square metres of the 693 square metre public park as fully satisfying the parkland dedication requirement pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, which lands are permitted to be encumbered by the below grade parking garage.
9. City Council direct that a Working Group be formed by the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the local Councillor, comprised of the applicant, the Greater Yorkville Residents Association and the ABC Residents Association and their memberships, the Bloor Yorkville Business Improvement Area, the Yonge-Bay-Bloor Business Association, adjacent property owners, City Planning and other appropriate staff, including Transportation Services staff, to review the site plan application and construction management plans once they are submitted. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
|
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Presentation from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The applications propose to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit two linked mixed use towers of 62 storeys (203 metres tall plus a 12-metre mechanical penthouse) on Yorkville Avenue and of 40 storeys (136.5 metres tall plus a 6.0-metre mechanical penthouse) on Cumberland Street with a 2, 7 and 10-storey base for the property at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street. An open space is proposed along the eastern edge of the property from Yorkville Avenue to Cumberland Street. A total of 1,100 residential units and 1,136 parking spaces are proposed (800 replacement Toronto Parking Authority spaces and 336 residential spaces).
The proposed development is consistent with all relevant policies of the Official Plan as well as the Bloor-Yorkville/North Midtown Urban Design Guidelines and includes two mid-block pedestrian connections, below-grade and at-grade through an open space.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Zoning By-law and Official Plan. Two other staff reports relevant to the review of this application regarding the Yorkville – East of Bay Planning Framework and a development application at a site at 50 Bloor Street West, will also be before Toronto and East York Community Council at its August 12, 2014 meeting. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72293.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| John Caliendo, ABCRA |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 9, 2014) E-mail from L. Cheng (TE.Supp.TE34.32.1)
(August 11, 2014) Letter from Thomas McRae, Shibley Righton LLP, on behalf of the Toronto District School Board (TE.Supp.TE34.32.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49126.pdf) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Lisa Guo (CC.Main.TE34.32.3)
|
| TE34.33 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:29 |
| Final Report - 1042-1048 Broadview Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Bill 1009 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 1069-2005, for the lands known as 1042-1048 Broadview Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated December 6, 2005, between the City and the original owner of the property as contemplated in the report dated (July 8, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting Toronto City Council directed staff to bring forward an amendment to site specific Zoning By-law No. 1069-2005 in order to authorize reallocation of unused section 37 funds previously secured for various specified purposes as part of the development at 1042-1048 Broadview Avenue. Council directed that the unused funds, including accrued interest, should be applied towards capital improvements to local parks, specifically Charles Sauriol Parkette located in Ward 29. Staff were also authorized to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement registered on title to the subject lands.
This report recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment providing for the reallocation as described above. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Final Report - 1042-1048 Broadview Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71535.pdf) |
| TE34.34 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Final Report - 243 Perth Avenue - Site Plan Control Application |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the proposed Site Plan Control application for the lands at 243 Perth Avenue, subject to the conditions set out in Attachment No. 3 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments:
Pre-approval:
a. Drawing AC100 be revised to eliminate the garbage storage room.
b. The owner submit revised documentation showing all applicable Tier 1 Toronto Green Standards are fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
c. Should the owner wish to enroll and qualify for the Toronto Green Standard Tier 2 Development Charge Refund, the owner provide revised site plan drawings to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, documenting compliance with all applicable Tier 1 Toronto Green Standard requirements.
Post-approval:
a. A warning clause be added in the Site Plan Agreement, all purchase and sale agreements, and Condominium Declaration that the City of Toronto Solid Waste Collection will not provide service to the development.
2. City Council delegate back to the Chief Planner, or her designate, the authority to issue final Site Plan Approval. |
| Origin |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to convert the existing church at 243 Perth Avenue into 42 residential units, with 28 units contained in the converted church and 14 units contained within a 4-storey addition on the north side of the church. A total of 19 parking spaces are proposed, including 16 spaces located under the new building and three spaces at-grade accessed from the laneway to the east of the site. The attached Site Plan Approval Conditions require the applicant to provide indoor garbage storage as part of the development. The applicant has submitted plans showing these facilities to the satisfaction of City Staff. However, the applicant is now stating that they are unable to provide these facilities which are necessary for this project.
City Planning Staff have finished their review of the site plan application for 243 Perth Avenue and are prepared to issue Notice of Approval Conditions. This report reviews and recommends approval in principle of the Site Plan Control application. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 243 Perth Avenue - Site Plan Control Application - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72587.pdf) (July 18, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 243 Perth Avenue - Site Plan Control Application - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71670.pdf) |
| TE34.35 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Request for Direction Report - 604 to 618 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and City staff as appropriate to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing and to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 604 to 618 Richmond Street West in its present form for the reasons set out in this report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in this report, including:
a. reducing the proposed height and massing so as not to overdevelop the site and to limit negative impacts on adjacent properties to the north;
b. improving compliance with Council's approved planning framework for the area including the King-Spadina Urban Design Guidelines; and
c. increasing the amenity space and visitor parking spaces.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Chief Planner, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.
4. City Council direct staff, in the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as a site plan agreement has been entered into between the City and the owner and any pre-conditions to site plan approval are fulfilled including addressing parking spaces and access, loading and servicing issues, as outlined in the memo from the Manager, Development Engineering, Toronto and East York District dated December 10, 2013.
5. City Council approve, in the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part and the Board's final order comes into force and effect, the application to demolish the existing residential buildings at 604, 608, 610, 612, 614 and 618 Richmond Street West, including the 3 residential rental dwelling units, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363.
6. City Council authorize, in the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part and the Board's final order comes into force and effect:
a. the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue a preliminary approval of the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the existing residential rental housing buildings when the following has occurred:
i. the zoning by-law amendment for the proposed development has come into full force and effect; and
ii. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner or her designate, pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act, 1990;
b. the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner, has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7a) above for the existing rental housing buildings;
c. the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the demolition of residential dwelling units no earlier than the date of issuance of a building permit for the shoring and excavation for the residential development permitted by the zoning amendment. This authorization is for the lands on which the existing rental buildings are situated, and after the Chief Planner has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 7.a. above which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:
i. the owner erect a residential building on the site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and
ii. should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 7.c.i. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector's roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.
7. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials, in event that the Ontario Municipal Board approve the application for rezoning, to issue the required permits under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, and Section 33 of the Planning Act in keeping with the standard practices followed in these circumstances. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the development of a 14-storey mixed-use building with commercial uses at grade and 220 residential units above the ground floor at 604, 606, 610, 614, 616 and 618 Richmond Street West. The proposal includes 5 levels of below grade parking including 101 residential parking spaces and 10 visitor parking spaces.
The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on their request for a Zoning By-law Amendment.
This application involves the demolition of a related group of buildings which contain 7 residential dwelling units, at least 3 of which were last used for rental purposes. A Rental Housing Demolition application was also submitted under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act to demolish the residential rental units on the site pursuant to Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code. The City's decision on the Rental Demolition application is not appealable by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board.
This report reviews the application to amend the Zoning By-law and recommends that City Council direct the City Solicitor and City staff as appropriate attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the application in its present form. Should the OMB approve the redevelopment proposal, authorization is being sought from Council to permit staff to allow the demolition of this limited number of residential units under both Municipal Code Chapter 667 and Section 33 of the Planning Act, subject to certain conditions. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 604 to 618 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72129.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Michael Rosenberg |
| TE34.36 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| 55 Charles Street West - Draft Plan of Condominium Application - Supplementary Report |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council extend the draft condominium approval lapsing period for 55 Charles Street West with the conditions that were approved at City Council's meeting of February 22 and 23, 2010, and further extended at its meeting of November 27, 28 and 29, 2012, with the following change to condition 1 and the addition of a new condition 14, as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District:
"1. The plan of condominium (declaration and description) shall be registered on or before February 23, 2018, otherwise the approval shall lapse and be of no further force and effect unless an extension is granted by the City pursuant to Section 51 (33) of the Planning Act.
14. The Owner shall enter into a Condominium Agreement satisfactory to, and at the discretion of, the City Solicitor whereby the Owner agrees to ensure that all tenants of the building residing in units on or before the date of registration of the condominium, are entitled to the right of security of tenure and the right of first refusal as referred to in Section 51 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, and that such rights will continue to be offered by the current Owner and subsequent purchasers despite any changes to such Act." |
| Origin |
| (June 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application involves the conversion of an existing 32-storey, 148 unit high-end of market rental apartment building into a residential condominium building at 55 Charles Street West. This condominium was approved by City Council at its February 22 and 23, 2010 meeting, with the three year time limit to register the condominium, initially set to lapse on February 23, 2013. This time limit was previously extended by an additional two years to February 23, 2015. This report recommends that the lapsing date for draft condominium approval be further extended by an additional three years to February 23, 2018, to allow the applicant additional time to fulfill the conditions of approval and register the condominium. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 55 Charles Street West - Draft Plan of Condominium Application - Supplementary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72366.pdf) |
| TE34.37 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Final Report - 12 Bonnycastle Street - Application to Remove the Holding Symbol from the Zoning By-law |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 1049-2006 within 12 Bonnycastle (Parkside), substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require that the Section 37 Agreement has been executed and the City has received approval from the Province to remove the lands from the Lower Don Special Policy Area.
4. In accordance with Zoning By-law 1049-2006, City Council request the City Solicitor forward to Redpath Sugar Ltd. a copy of the Section 37 Agreement within 10 days of the execution of the agreement. |
| Origin |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from 12 Bonnycastle Street, in the area known as "Parkside" in the East Bayfront, for lands that are being redeveloped as a mixed-use condominium.
A Zoning by-law amendment application was filed by Waterfront Toronto to remove the holding symbol ("h"), on the lands bounded by Bonnycastle, Queens Quay East, Sherbourne Common North park and Lake Shore Boulevard.
The City and Waterfront Toronto are in the process of finalizing a Section 37 Agreement to secure the required matters. Zoning By-law 1049-2006, as amended, also requires that the lands be removed from the Lower Don Special Policy Area. The TRCA has deemed the flood protection landform to be complete and functional, and the City is in the process of obtaining approval from the Province to remove lands from the Lower Don Special Policy Area.
When approval to remove the Parkside lands from the SPA and Section 37 Agreement is executed, Waterfront Toronto will have satisfied the conditions of removing the Holding Symbol from the Zoning by-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 12 Bonnycastle Street - Application to Remove the Holding Symbol from the Zoning By-law - Final Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70833.pdf) |
| TE34.38 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Request for Directions - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East |
| The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE34.38a with recommendations) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East and attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to such appeal, and retain such experts as the City Solicitor may determine are appropriate in support of the position recommended in the report dated July 16, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor to secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as may be required by the Chief Planner should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.
3. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in this report. |
| Origin |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to redevelop the subject site at 20 Lombard Street (25 Richmond Street East) and 26 Lombard Street. The proposal is for a mixed-use commercial-residential development that consists of a 50-storey tower (165 metres in height including the mechanical penthouse, and 159 metres in height excluding mechanical penthouse) with a 4-storey (approximately 17.5 metres in height) podium. The proposal also includes the retention in situ, alteration and restoration of the two existing 4-storey designated heritage buildings at 26 Lombard Street, which are proposed to contain a total of 12 residential dwelling units on the second, third and fourth storeys and the residential lobby together with 325 square metres of retail space at grade.
A total of 689 residential dwelling units are proposed, together with 285 vehicular parking spaces and 760 bicycle parking spaces in an underground garage. The total proposed gross floor area is approximately 17.9 times the lot area.
The applicant has appealed its application for a Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board prior to Council making a decision on the application. This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application's proposed building height. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East - Request for Directions
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72100.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 21, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Application - Supplementary Request for Directions (TE34.38a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73114.pdf) |
| TE34.39 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described for the property located at 26 Lombard Street. The applicant has applied for a Zoning Amendment for the subject property to allow for the construction of a 50-storey mixed use building containing 689 residential dwelling units and grade related retail space. The properties at 20 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East form the remainder of the development site. The applicant is proposing to retain the two four-storey semi-detached designated heritage buildings at 26 Lombard Street and rehabilitate them as part of the proposal. The heritage buildings will contain dwelling units, a residential lobby, and retail space. A one storey addition will be added to the heritage buildings and they be physically linked to the proposed tower by an above grade bridge connection set back from the street. The adjacent property at 75 Victoria Street is also included on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties. Council's approval of the proposed heritage alteration is required under the Ontario Heritage Act. The related Zoning Amendment application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board. Under the Ontario Heritage Act there is no appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board from a decision of City Council respecting the alteration of a heritage building designated pursuant to Part IV of the Act, however an owner may request a review of a decision by the Conservation Review Board, which then results in recommendations to the City Council. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72367.pdf) Attachment 1 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72422.pdf) Attachment 2 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72423.pdf) Attachment 3 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72424.pdf) Attachment 4 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72425.pdf) Attachment 5 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter Into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72426.pdf) |
| 39a | Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 20-26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71804.pdf) |
| TE34.40 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include the property at 55 Sudbury Street, the former Diamond Glass Company, on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: (Reasons for Listing) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (June 23, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division. |
| Origin |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 55 Sudbury Street, the Diamond Glass Company on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties for its cultural heritage value. Located on the south side of Sudbury Street at the junction with Dovercourt Road, the original Diamond Glass Company office building is a two-and-a-half storey brick and stone clad building completed c 1899-1900.
Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property at 55 Sudbury Street meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation that is also used by the City when assessing properties for inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties. Inclusion on the inventory would identify the property's heritage values and attributes and enable City Council to control alterations to the site and refuse demolition. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72386.pdf) Attachment 1 - Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72368.pdf) Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72387.pdf) Attachment 3 - Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72388.pdf) Attachment 4 - Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72427.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Christopher J. Williams, Aird & Berlis LLP |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Christopher J. Williams, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE34.40.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48893.pdf) |
| 40a | Inclusion on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (July 15, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Inclusion on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties – 55 Sudbury Street.
Michael Hirsh and Elaine Waisglass addressed the Toronto Preservation Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Inclusion on the City's Inventory of Heritage Properties - 55 Sudbury Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71849.pdf) |
| TE34.41 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include the property at 300 King Street West (Princess of Wales Theatre) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 300 King Street West (Princess of Wales Theatre) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 300 King Street West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (July 3, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.
6. City Council grant authority for the execution of Heritage Easement Agreements under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the properties at 260, 284 and 322 King Street West.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreements. |
| Origin |
| (July 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 300 King Street West (Princess of Wales Theatre) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and grant authority to enter into Heritage Easement Agreements for the properties at 260, 284 and 322 King Street West.
Approval of this report will the necessary Council authority for staff to negotiate legal mechanisms by which certain commitments can be made by the applicant, to the City, as part of the current Zoning By-law Amendment and Ontario Municipal Board hearing. It does not make recommendations with respect to the proposed conservation strategy. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72369.pdf) Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72370.pdf) Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72371.pdf) Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72372.pdf) Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate, 300 King Street West, and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements, 260, 284 and 322 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72373.pdf) |
| 41a | Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 300 King Street West and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements - 260, 284 and 322 King Street West |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (July 3, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 300 King Street West and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements - 260, 284 and 322 King Street West. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 300 King Street West and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements - 260, 284 and 322 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71852.pdf) |
| TE34.43 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Amendment of Designating By-law - 15-33 Mercer Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law No. 347-92 to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the Statements of Significance: 15-33 Mercer Street attached as Attachment Nos. 4A-C to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and describe its heritage attributes.
2. If there are no objections to the proposed amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending designating By-law No. 347-92.
3. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the proposed amendment is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to amend the designating by-law. |
| Origin |
| (May 30, 2014) Report from Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council amend former City of Toronto By-law 347-92, designating the property at 15-31 Mercer Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. Located on the south side of Mercer Street, west of John Street, the property at 15-33 Mercer Street contains three buildings built between 1895 and 1939 for Pilkington Brothers Limited, glass manufacturers.
While the 1992 by-law covers the entire property at 15-33 Mercer Street, only the portion of the site at 31 Mercer is described in the Reasons for Designation. The part of the property identified as 33 Mercer stands vacant, but the site also contains two warehouses at 15 and 19 Mercer that are important parts of Pilkington's purpose-built complex.
The proposed amendment of the designating by-law will ensure that all of the heritage values and attributes of the property at 15-33 Mercer Street are described as set out in the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72395.pdf) Attachment 1 - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72396.pdf) Attachment 2 - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72397.pdf) Attachment 3 - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72398.pdf) Attachment 4 - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72399.pdf) Attachment 5 - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72400.pdf) |
| 43a | Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered the following:
1. (May 30, 2014) report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Amendment of Designating By-law – 15-33 Mercer Street.
2. (July 11, 2014) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Barristers and Solicitors (PB.Supp.PB33.10.1) |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Amendment of Designating By-Law - 15-33 Mercer Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71844.pdf) |
| TE34.44 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the position that it retains a concern that the Waverly Hotel at 484 Spadina Avenue may have cultural heritage value.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to engage a consultant to further consider the matter for the purposes of the Ontario Municipal Board hearing relating to the development proposal for the site. |
| Origin |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council receive this report on the Waverley Hotel portion of the property at 484 Spadina Avenue for information and that no further action be taken. At its meeting of April 8, 2014, the Toronto and East York Community Council, in considering the report (March 20, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, entitled, "Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 484 Spadina Avenue", referred the Waverly Hotel portion of the property at 484 Spadina Avenue to the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, for further review for designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Staff have re-evaluated the Waverley Hotel against provincial criteria and have concluded that the Waverley Hotel should not be added to the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties or designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act because it does not meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed by the Province of Ontario for municipal designation.
Located on the west side of Spadina Avenue north of College Street the property at 484 Spadina Avenue contains the three-and-a-half story Waverley Hotel and one-and-a-half story Silver Dollar Room. The Silver Dollar Room is currently subject to a Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72401.pdf) Attachment 1 - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72402.pdf) Attachment 2 - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72403.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 10, 2014) Letter from Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents' Association (TE.Supp.TE34.44.1)
(August 8, 2014) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, counsel to 1095909 Ontario Limited (Wyan Group of Companies) (TE.Supp.TE34.44.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49026.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario (TE.Supp.TE34.44.3) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Michael B. Vaughan, Michael B. Vaughan, QC., Professional Corporation (TE.Supp.TE34.44.4) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49051.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Rollo Myers (TE.Supp.TE34.44.5) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, President, Toronto Branch of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (TE.Supp.TE34.44.6) |
| 44a | Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered the following:
1. (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Heritage Evaluation – 484 Spadina Avenue – Waverley Hotel.
2. (July 16, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (PB.33.15.1)
3. (July 16, 2014) Letter from Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents' Association (PB33.15.2)
The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:
Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario
Mark Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71848.pdf) |
| 44b | Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverley Hotel |
| Origin |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina |
| Summary |
I have undertaken further consultation with the community on this matter. You will have received communications from the Harbord Village Residents Association as well as from Architectural Conservancy Ontario.
The attached communication from Michael McClelland, Principal, ERA Architects indicates that the Waverly Hotel and the Silver Dollar both have heritage value. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverly Hotel
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72842.pdf) Attachment - Letter from E.R.A. Architects Inc. - Heritage Evaluation - 484 Spadina Avenue - Waverly Hotel (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72843.pdf) |
| TE34.45 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include the property at 7 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
2. City Council include the property at 9 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
3. City Council include the property at11 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
4. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 7 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 7-11 Gloucester Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (June 19, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
5. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 9 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 7-11 Gloucester Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (June 19, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
6. City Council state its intention to designate the property at11 Gloucester Street (Hugh Matheson House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 7-11 Gloucester Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (June 19, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
7. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
8. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
9. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties. |
| Origin |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 7-11 Gloucester Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The trio of row houses (1886) are located on the south side of Gloucester Street, directly east of Yonge Street.
A development application has been submitted for the adjoining properties at 2 and 4 Dundonald Street, 7 and 9 Gloucester Street, and 587, 593-595 and 599 Yonge Street that would result in the removal of all of the existing buildings on the site apart from the pair of row houses at 7 and 9 Gloucester Street. The attached row house at 11 Gloucester Street is not part of the development site. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, Division - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72241.pdf) Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72404.pdf) Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72405.pdf) Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72406.pdf) Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72407.pdf) |
| 45a | Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered the following:
1. (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 7-11 Gloucester Street.
2. (July 15, 2014) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP (PB.Supp.PB33.18.1) |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 7-11 Gloucester Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71851.pdf) |
| TE34.46 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish 4 Astley Avenue, an "unrated" structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act subject to the owner, prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, submitting photo-documentation of the existing structure at 4 Astley Avenue to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council approve the replacement building as shown in the plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and prepared by CS&P Architects Inc., date stamped "Received" by Heritage Preservation Services on June 18, 2014 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and that the replacement structure be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted plans, subject to the following condition:
a. Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the replacement structure located at 4 Astley Avenue, the applicant will provide final building permit drawings and a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. |
| Origin |
| (June 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of a designated non-contributing heritage property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (NRHCD) and the construction of a replacement structure under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposal is to demolish an existing 1½-storey brick building and to construct a new 3-storey brick building of a modern architectural style. The existing property was evaluated as an "unrated" structure in the NRHCD and, as per the District Plan, is not considered to be of national, provincial, citywide or contextual heritage significance and does not contribute to the heritage character of the heritage conservation district. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72408.pdf) Attachment 1 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72409.pdf) Attachment 2 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72410.pdf) Attachment 3 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72411.pdf) Attachment 4 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72412.pdf) Attachment 5 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72413.pdf) |
| 46a | Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue.
Babak Shajari addressed the Toronto Preservation Board. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 4 Astley Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71845.pdf) |
| TE34.47 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish 17 Pricefield Road, an "unrated" structure in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act subject to the owner, prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, submitting photo-documentation of the existing structure at 17 Pricefield Road to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. City Council approve the replacement building as shown in the plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and prepared by Richard Wengle Architect Inc., dated May 20, 2014, all date stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and that the replacement structure be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted plans, subject to the following condition:
a. Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the replacement structure located at 17 Pricefield Road, the applicant will provide final building permit drawings and a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. |
| Origin |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of a designated non-contributing heritage property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (SRHCD) and the construction of a replacement structure under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposal is to demolish an existing 2-storey brick building and to construct a new 2½ storey brick building with Georgian influences. The existing property has been evaluated as an "unrated" structure in the SRHCD, and as per the District Plan is not considered to be of national, provincial, citywide or contextual heritage significant and does not contribute to the heritage character of the heritage conservation district. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72242.pdf) Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Attachment 1 - Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72414.pdf) Attachment 2 - Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72415.pdf) Attachment 3 - Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72416.pdf) Attachment 4 - Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72417.pdf) |
| 47a | Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road |
| Origin |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 23, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 18, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 17 Pricefield Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71846.pdf) |
| TE34.51 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:29 |
| Hillside Drive, South of Gamble Avenue - Green Street Project and Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of Portion of East Limit of Hillside Drive |
| The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE34.51a for information) Bill 889 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Public Notice Given |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council permanently close to vehicular traffic the 0.3 metre wide strips of land on the east side of Hillside Drive, designated as Parts 1, 2, 3 and 5 on Plan 66R-27544, and shown as Parts 1 and 2 on Sketch No. PS-2014-005 and Parts 1 and 2 on Sketch No. PS-2014-006 (collectively the "Highway"), (refer to Attachment Nos. 1-3 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B).
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to initiate the process to close to vehicular traffic a 0.3 metre wide strip of land shown as Part 4 on Plan 66R-27544 attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council.
4. City Council direct City Planning, Transportation Services, Toronto Water, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff, in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Ward Councillor, and area residents to address matters regarding the Hillside Drive - Green Street Project through the development of several green streetscape options and a review of the implementation requirements for each option as set out in Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B.
5. City Council direct City Planning staff to hold a community consultation meeting with area residents to determine a preferred green streetscape option.
6. City Council direct City Planning and Transportation Services staff to provide notice of the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting to the residents of 58, 60, 62, 64, 65/65A and 66 Hillside Drive in the event that some of the existing on-street parking on the east side of Hillside Drive is proposed to be eliminated in conjunction with the Green Street Project.
7. City Council direct City Planning staff to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 regarding the preferred green streetscape option for Hillside Drive.
8. City Council direct that the Confidential Information attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B shall remain confidential, as it contains advice that pertains to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City.
9. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to review the potential for redesignation of the lands at the southwest corner of Broadview and Gamble Avenues from Neighbourhoods to Parks and Open Space in the Official Plan, and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015.
10. City Council request that no disposition of the lands at the southwest corner of Broadview and Gamble Avenues be considered by staff until such time as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, have reviewed the potential for redesignation of the subject lands.
11. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to review situations where more than one driveway access can be permitted for a residential property in low-rise neighbourhoods and submit a report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 on potential policies or procedures to address any issues that may arise, together with a process for community consultation where appropriate.
12. Following confirmation through an inspection by Toronto Building that access to parking is available from Hillside Drive for 1150 Broadview Avenue, City Council request the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to re-instate the curb along the front of the original driveway at the front of 1150 Broadview Avenue, so that there is only one vehicular access to the property.
13. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and analyze the existing demand for on-street parking on Hillside Drive, south of Gamble Avenue as part of the Hillside Drive - Green Street Project to ensure that any proposed reduction in the number of parking spaces will maintain an adequate supply of on-street parking for Hillside Drive residents. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested the City Solicitor to report directly to City Council on August 25, 2014 on a means by which to withhold approval of access permits, in cases where an existing driveway access remains in place, until such time as staff reports back to City Council, through the Toronto and East York Community Council, on the request outlined in the following Recommendation 11:
"11. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to review situations where more than one driveway access can be permitted for a residential property in low-rise neighbourhoods and submit a report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 on potential policies or procedures to address any issues that may arise, together with a process for community consultation where appropriate."
2. Requested the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, to submit a report directly to City Council on August 25, 2014 on a chronology of events and relevant By-law dates with respect to the issuance of the access permit and building permit for 1150 Broadview Avenue.
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on August 12, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B |
| Summary |
At its meeting on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014, City Council directed City Planning and Transportation Services to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council regarding streetscape matters on Hillside Drive, south of Gamble Avenue.
In particular, staff were directed to initiate the process to permanently close to vehicular traffic on a portion of the east limit of Hillside Drive and to review potential green streetscape opportunities for the northern portion of Hillside Drive. The latter is referred to as the Hillside Drive - Green Street Project.
Staff were also asked to review the process that was followed in granting approval of the access permit for 1150 Broadview Avenue and the implications of revoking the access permit. This report provides details regarding the proposed by-law for the permanent closure of the east limit of Hillside Drive; potential opportunities to enhance the green streetscape character in the subject area; and the review process that was followed in granting approval of the access permit for rear of 1150 Broadview Avenue. The implications of revoking vehicular access to the rear of 1150 Broadview Avenue are outlined in the Confidential Attachment (Attachment No. 9). |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B - Hillside Drive, South of Gamble Avenue - Green Street Project and Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of Portion of East Limit of Hillside Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72365.pdf) |
| Background Information (City Council) |
| (August 22, 2014) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Chronology of Driveway Approval - 1150 Broadview Avenue (TE34.51a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73089.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Richard Gerskup |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer McIntyre (TE.Supp.TE34.51.1)
(August 9, 2014) Letter from Mark Le Messurier and Ralph R. Pascht (TE.Supp.TE34.51.2) (August 12, 2014) Submission from Arthur Tateishi (TE.Supp.TE34.51.3) (August 12, 2014) Submission from John M. Grima (TE.Supp.TE34.51.4) |
| TE34.61 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:29 |
| Application to Remove a Private Tree - 324 and 326 Donlands Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove the privately owned tree-of-heaven straddling the property line between 324 and 326 Donlands Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (March 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation |
| Summary |
This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree straddling the rear property line between 324 and 326 Donlands Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to the tree's location and condition.
The subject tree is a tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) measuring 45 cm in diameter. The tree is in good condition structurally and botanically. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (March 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 324 and 326 Donlands Avenue - Application to Remove a Private Tree
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70836.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (May 13, 2014) Submission from Deidre Gilchrist (TE.Main.TE34.61.1)
(June 7, 2014) Letter from Martin MacDonald and Kristen Oliver (TE.Main.TE34.61.2) (May 7, 2014) Letter from Peter Ip (TE.Main.TE34.61.3) |
| TE34.69 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 12 York Street |
| Bill 899 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:
- 12 York Street.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 12 York Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71765.pdf) Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 12 York Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71766.pdf) |
| TE34.70 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 45 Dunfield Avenue |
| Bill 900 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:
- 45 Dunfield Avenue.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (June 24, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 24, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 45 Dunfield Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70995.pdf) Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 45 Dunfield Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70996.pdf) |
| TE34.71 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1 Parkmount Road |
| Bill 901 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:
- 1 Parkmount Road.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. |
| Origin |
| (February 28, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services |
| Summary |
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (February 28, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1 Parkmount Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70840.pdf) Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1 Parkmount Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70841.pdf) |
| TE34.72 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| 101 St. Clair Avenue West - Public Art Plan |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 101 St, Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan as attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design.
2. City Council direct the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to request that the Residents’ and Ratepayers’ Associations representing Deer Park Residents’ Group and Foxbar Neighbourhood Association, as well as the condominium board at Granite Place, each appoint one (1) member to be included on the Art Selection Team. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 101 St Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.
This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the project overview; curatorial vision; location; key objectives; an overview of the development team's public art experience; the artist selection team/jury; the project design team; the public art consultants role; the artist selection process; public relations and community programming opportunity; estimated public art budget; and the schedule.
The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - 101 St Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71721.pdf) Attachment - 101 St. Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71722.pdf) |
| TE34.73 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| 129 St. Clair Avenue West - Public Art Plan |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 129 St. Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan as attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design.
2. City Council direct the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to request that the Residents’ and Ratepayers’ Associations representing Deer Park Residents’ Group and Foxbar Neighbourhood Association, as well as the condominium board at Granite Place, each appoint one (1) member to be included on the Art Selection Team. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 129 St. Clair Avenue West Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.
This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the project overview; curatorial vision; the overview of the development; description of the proposed public art site; public art opportunities including key objectives; artist selection team; the design team; background on the public art consultant; artist selection process; public art relations program; community programming opportunity; estimated public art budget; and schedule.
The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - 129 St. Clair Avenue West - Public Art Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71718.pdf) Attachment - 129 St. Clair Avenue West - Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71719.pdf) |
| TE34.74 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| 454 Yonge Street Public Art Plan |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the 454 Yonge Street Public Art Plan as attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 454 Yonge Street Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.
This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development overview; public art sites and opportunities; selection process; technical review; jury composition; project team; the role of the art consultant; estimated public art budget; and the schedule.
The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - 454 Yonge Street Public Art Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71714.pdf) Attachment - 454 Yonge Street Public Art Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71715.pdf) |
| TE34.75 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:14 |
| Underground Crossing Agreement Associated with the Development of Lands at 1100 King Street West |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services to:
a. negotiate, enter into and execute a crossing agreement, crossing permit, or related documents with Metrolinx, as well as all renewals and extensions, to permit the installation of a new watermain crossing within the Weston Subdivision rail corridor, between Sudbury Street on the north side of the rail corridor and Joe Shuster Way on the south side of the corridor, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor;
b. negotiate and execute an agreement with the Developer:
i. to secure the Developer's payment of the cost of designing and constructing the new watermain; fees charged by Metrolinx for reviewing the watermain relocation plans; all costs necessary to terminate the existing 1968 crossing agreement; and any other costs associated with the watermain relocation deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
ii. to have the Developer construct a new watermain from Sudbury Street, crossing the Metrolinx rail corridor, through the northwest corner of the Developer's land via a new easement and onto Joe Shuster Way; and
iii. to complete all work associated with the termination of the 1968 crossing agreement as deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and
c. terminate the 1968 crossing agreement, as described in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Engineering Services, for the existing watermain that currently traverses the rail corridor upon entering into the agreements noted in Recommendations 1.a. and 1.b.
2. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Engineering Review |
| Summary |
This report seeks authority for the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City of Toronto two agreements: (i) a crossing agreement with Metrolinx; and (ii) an additional agreement with the owners developing the lands at 1100 King Street West (the "Developer"), currently Kingsclub Development Inc., to permit the installation of a watermain under Metrolinx's rail corridor adjacent to the development site. As a condition of approval of the development, the Developer is required to relocate an existing watermain that crosses the easterly portion of the development site and the rail corridor. This obligation was secured in a May 15, 2006 Section 37 Agreement between the City and the Developer.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Engineering Review - Underground Crossing Agreement Association with the Development of Lands at 1100 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72269.pdf) |
| TE34.90 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Preliminary Report - 835-841 Queen Street East - Application for Rental Housing Demolition Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve in principle, subject to final approval of a Section 111 permit, the demolition of the 36 social housing units at 835-841 Queen Street East with replacement at on off-site location, and the removal of the obligation to replace the units on-site as a condition of receiving development approvals for any future proposal for 835-841 Queen Street East. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested staff to work with WoodGreen Community Services and WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. to bring forward a detailed proposal for the timely replacement of the existing 36 social housing units at 835-841 Queen Street East at an off-site location, and a tenant relocation and assistance plan appropriate for the current residents, in conjunction with the final report on the application for a Section 111 permit to demolish the social housing units under Chapter 667. |
| Origin |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This application proposes to demolish the existing 36 residential rental units in a mixed-use building at 835-841 Queen Street East that has also included non-profit community services. The residential component of the building is social housing, including rent-geared-to-income subsidies, and is owned and operated by a community non-profit housing provider. This community-based organization also owns and operates other non-profit housing in the area, and their activities include community services delivered at a number of other locations.
The social housing units would be relocated off-site in order to allow for the sale of the subject property to a third party for redevelopment purposes. The sale of the property would allow the community organization to create a community services "hub" in a new location, consolidating a number of their other service locations currently spread throughout the community.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 835-841 Queen Street East - Application for Rental Housing Demolition Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Preliminary Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72282.pdf) |
| TE34.92 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study - Status Report |
| Communications TE34.92.2 and TE34.92.3 have been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council endorse the draft Public Realm Strategy, Attachment 1 to the report (August 5, 2014) and the Built Form Directions as outlined in the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and direct staff to apply the draft Public Realm Strategy and Built Form Directions in evaluating current and future development applications and public realm improvements and investment in the area.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to identify potential new parkland and proceed with on-site parkland dedications, off-site dedications and parkland acquisition in the East Precinct of King-Spadina on a priority basis.
3. City Council endorse the following directions for the King-Spadina East Precinct to be used in reviewing current and future development applications:
a. A downward gradation of tower heights from east to west from University Avenue towards Spadina Avenue.
b. Limiting heights approaching Queen Street West to prevent shadowing on the north sidewalk after 12:00 (noon) in the spring and fall equinoxes.
c. Employing the city-wide Tall Buildings Guidelines to evaluate towers, particularly with regard to tower spacing and tower floor plates.
d. Evaluating new development applications in the context of a block plan for the block on which they sit.
e. Seeking the inclusion of family-sized units in all new residential development.
f. Requiring the inclusion of employment uses in new residential development that replaces existing office uses, resulting in a net gain in employment, consistent with OPA 231.
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward any required Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments arising from the East Precinct Built Form Study to a statutory public meeting under the Planning Act in 2015 after concluding on-going community consultations.
5. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to amend the study purpose to include the social value of buildings, in addition to built form and physical character.
6. City Council request the Director, Urban Design, in the development of the design of the John Street Cultural Corridor, to take into account the different conditions of John Street north of Queen Street West, with its many residential uses and its connection to the Grange Park revitalization, in consultation with the Queen Street West BIA, area residents and the Ward Councillor. |
| Origin |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to update City Council on the status of the work on the King Spadina East Precinct Built form Study. It also recommends that City Council endorse the emerging directions of the study to inform staff's review of current and future development applications. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study and Public Realm Strategy - Status Update
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72659.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study - Status Report - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71800.pdf) Attachment 1-1 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72558.pdf) Attachment 1-2 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72573.pdf) Attachment 1-3 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72597.pdf) Attachment 1-4 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72598.pdf) Attachment 1-5 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72574.pdf) Attachment 1-6 - King Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72575.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Janice Solomon, Executive Director, Toronto Entertainment District B.I.A. (TE.Supp.TE34.92.1)
|
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 19, 2014) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, Barristers & Solicitors (CC.Main.TE34.92.2)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49498.pdf) (August 25, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (CC.New.TE34.92.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49592.pdf) |
| TE34.93 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council endorse the Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and direct staff to apply the Planning Framework during the review of current and future development applications.
2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a policy review including consideration of: the Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework endorsed in Recommendation 1 above; built form; land use; heritage; public realm; community services and facilities/infrastructure; and any relevant Official Plan Policies, the Bloor-Yorkville/North Midtown Urban Design Guidelines, the Tall Building Guidelines and other matters, for the Greater Yorkville area bounded by the Canadian Pacific Railway corridor, Avenue Road/Queens Park, Yonge Street/Rosedale Valley Road/Sherbourne Street and Charles Street/Mt. Pleasant Road/Selby Street.
3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward any required Official Plan Amendments arising from the policy review to a statutory public meeting under the Planning Act after holding community consultation.
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to identify urban design, cultural and parkland "gateway" opportunities at the intersections of Yonge and Bloor, Yonge and Davenport, Yonge and Crescent and Yonge and Scrivener Square and other potential spaces, in consultation with local residents and Business Improvement Associations, and submit a report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2015. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report introduces and recommends a focussed Planning Framework for the Yorkville - East of Bay area to be used to evaluate current and future development applications.
The Planning Framework will apply to the area of Yorkville located between Bay Street and Yonge Street, from Bloor Street to Davenport Road. It complements and clarifies existing Official Plan policies and design guidelines.
As Yorkville - East of Bay continues to grow and intensify with tall buildings, the Framework will guide development with a vision of well-sited, designed and massed tall buildings with a network of pedestrian mid-block connections and open spaces.
The Framework is intended to provide certainty as to where tall buildings can go and where open space is required to achieve those tall buildings.
Specifically, the Framework identifies opportunities for tall buildings outside of the Height Peak, Height Ridges and Low-rise Areas currently shown in Area Specific Official Plan Policy 211. The Framework also refines and expands the system of pedestrian connections currently outlined in Area Specific Official Plan Policy 225.
Planning staff have consulted extensively with the local resident associations, business associations and current applicants during the preparation of the Framework.
This report also recommends that the Planning Framework study be expanded and include the Greater Yorkville area, which could form the basis for an updated area specific Official Plan policies. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72286.pdf) Attachment 1 - Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72557.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Christel Higgs, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, solicitors for the owners of property located at 874, 876, and 878 Yonge Street (TE.Supp.TE34.93.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-49112.pdf) |
| TE34.94 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27, 28 |
| Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment - Status Report |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to bring forward the proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 82 for a statutory public meeting once the Garden District Heritage Conservation District Plan has been completed.
2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to post the Draft Official Plan Amendment on the City Planning web page. |
| Origin |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report provides an overview of the proposed Official Plan Amendment 82, being the Garden District Site and Area Specific Policy 461. Community Planning Staff have been working in parallel with Heritage Preservation Staff to conduct a land use planning study and a Heritage Conservation District ("HCD") Study for this area. The first phase of the HCD which developed a detailed heritage assessment of the area has been completed. The next phase of this work will focus on creating the actual HCD plan for the area. During the review City Planning Staff determined that the Garden District could further benefit from a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) to complement the HCD and provide a comprehensive planning framework for this area. These plans will form part of the broader revitalization strategy that was directed by City Council and is being undertaken by an inter-divisional staff team.
One of the catalysts of the area’s revitalization is the redevelopment and re-programming of Seaton House, one of the City’s oldest and largest shelters. The transformation of Seaton house will offer a true renewal of both public and private sites in this area. The proposed planning framework supports this renewal while also ensuring that balanced growth occurs and complete communities are achieved.
This report provides the proposed draft Official Plan Amendment for this area. This will assist in informing the preparation of both the HCD plan as well as the other components of the revitalization strategy. The final SASP will be brought forward once the HCD Plan is completed. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 8, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment - Status Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71794.pdf) |
| TE34.95 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Lower Yonge Precinct Plan - Proposals Report |
| Communication TE34.95.5 has been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council receive the Lower Yonge Urban Design Report attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, prepared by Perkins + Will on behalf of Waterfront Toronto and the City of Toronto.
2. City Council receive the finalized Lower Yonge Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, prepared by Arup on behalf of Waterfront Toronto and the City of Toronto.
3. City Council endorse in principle the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan - Planning and Policy Directions attached as Attachment 6 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to further consultation, review, and analysis in phase 2 of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan study.
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with Waterfront Toronto and other City Divisions, to complete the development of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan, based on the Planning and Policy Directions attached as Attachment 6 to the report (August 5, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015, including any recommended Official Plan amendments and implementing planning instruments.
5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to continue consultations with Lower Yonge community members, landowners, and stakeholders in development and preparation of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan. |
| Origin |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the outcomes of the first phase of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan study. The report presents Council with the Lower Yonge Urban Design Report; the Lower Yonge Transportation Master Plan; and Planning and Policy Directions for the emerging Lower Yonge Precinct Plan. The report also describes the anticipated work program for phase 2 of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan study. The further purpose of this report is to communicate the emerging Precinct Plan to landowners and community stakeholders, enabling them to continue to provide feedback and participate in the precinct planning process.
Staff are recommending that Council endorse the planning and policy directions contained in the Proposals report and provide direction with respect to the next steps of the precinct planning process. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Lower Yonge Precinct Plan - Proposals Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72586.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Lower Yonge Precinct Plan - Proposals Report - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72288.pdf) Attachment 4 - Urban Design Report: Principles and Recommendations (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72576.pdf) Attachment 5-1 - Lower Yonge - Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72599.pdf) Attachment 5-2 - Lower Yonge - Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72577.pdf) Attachment 5-3 - Lower Yonge - Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72600.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) E-mail from Al Workman, Vice-President, Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited (TE.Supp.TE34.95.1)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Blanche L. van Ginkel (TE.Supp.TE34.95.2) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Shealyn Clare-Bradshaw (TE.Supp.TE34.95.3) (August 9, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Nancy Paterson (TE.Supp.TE34.95.4) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Philip Wood (CC.Main.TE34.95.5)
|
| TE34.96 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative - A Public Space Plan for the Carlaw-Dundas Area |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative and support its implementation based on the principles, strategies and initiatives identified in this plan.
2. City Council require that future development applications within the Carlaw-Dundas area contribute towards public space improvements outlined in the Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to co-ordinate the implementation of the plan through an interdivisional team including City Planning, Economic Development, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and Transportation Services.
4. City Council endorse the establishment of a Stakeholder Advisory Committee consisting of members from the community to provide input as implementation of the plan proceeds.
5. City Council direct that the City of Toronto enter into a cost-sharing agreement with Toronto Hydro to update Badgerow Parkette as part of the Public Space Plan for the Carlaw Dundas Area. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
This report presents the recommendations of the Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative. Carlaw-Dundas is a former industrial area in the City's East End that has been undergoing a transformation, emerging as a mixed-use creative and cultural hub of workers and residents. This transformation began in the late 1990's where live/work units were permitted based on site-specific zoning provisions. The area was subject to several studies in the early 2000's that considered neighbourhood improvements.
Working with the community and a staff team, the Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative is a plan that establishes a vision for the Carlaw-Dundas community and identifies priority projects and strategies to implement improvements to public spaces.
The key items that are addressed in this Public Space Plan include:
- Strengthening the Carlaw-Dundas area as a hub for small business and cultural activities.
- Improvements to streetscapes and other public spaces.
- A strategy to execute the improvements
This Public Space Plan updates previous studies and guides public realm improvements, beginning with five projects that are underway. These five projects act as a catalyst for public space improvements in Carlaw-Dundas. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative - A Public Space Plan for the Carlaw-Dundas Area
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72131.pdf) Attachment 1 - Carlaw + Dundas Community Initiative - A Public Space Plan for the Carlaw-Dundas Area (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72579.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Myrna Kay Moore |
| TE34.97 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Affordable Housing Plan |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council receive for information the report (August 6, 2014) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, headed "10,11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Affordable Housing Plan". |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
At its meeting on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014, City Council deferred consideration of the final zoning by-law amendment report for 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue, collectively known as the “Ordnance Triangle”, to the August 26 and 27, 2014, Council meeting. The final zoning by-law amendment report recommended approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to construct two mixed-use buildings with towers at heights of 39, 34, and 24 storeys, comprising 1012 residential units and 10,810 square metres of non-residential floor space at 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue. It also recommended the approval of amendments to Official Plan Amendment 125 and to Zoning By-law 159-2012 to modify existing permissions for two residential buildings at 30 Ordnance Street (10 115786 STE 19 OZ).
The report also recommended that Council direct the Director of the Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report to the August 12, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council regarding the provision of affordable housing in the Ordnance Triangle.
Build Toronto, the Affordable Housing Office, Habitat for Humanity GTA and the developers, Diamond Corp, working in consultation with the Ward Councillor, have developed an affordable housing plan for the proposed development of these properties.
Under the plan, the developers will deliver 25 affordable ownership homes in Phase 2 of the development to Habitat for Humanity at an agreed-upon purchase price. The affordable housing plan has been approved by Build Toronto's Board of Directors.
The housing plan for the Ordnance Triangle is consistent with Build Toronto's 2010 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City regarding the development of affordable housing on Build Toronto sites. In early 2015, staff will report to the Affordable Housing Committee on Build Toronto's two to three year affordable housing action plan, currently being developed with the Affordable Housing Office. This plan will identify sites, funding sources and financial strategies to deliver affordable housing. The funding and incentive details for the 25 Habitat homes in the Ordnance Triangle will be part of this report. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Affordable Housing Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72583.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office - 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Affordable Housing Plan - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72124.pdf) |
| TE34.100 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Construction Staging Area - 1000 Bay Street |
| Bill 947 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and curb lane on the west side of Bay Street, between St. Joseph Street and St. Basil Lane, from August 28, 2014 to February 28, 2016.
2. City Council rescind the existing "No Stopping, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Mon. to Fri. except public holidays" regulation on the west side of Bay Street, between St. Joseph Street and St. Basil Lane.
3. City Council enact a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the west side of Bay Street, between St. Joseph Street and St. Basil Lane.
4. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to request the alteration and/or removal of the proposed staging area, if required, to accommodate the Pan Am festivities during the months of July and August 2015.
5. City Council direct that Bay Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
6. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
7. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor. |
| Origin |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Cresford Developments is constructing a 32-storey condominium at 1000 Bay Street, on the southwest corner of Bay Street and St. Joseph Street. They need to close the west sidewalk and west curb lane on Bay Street in order to do their work.
Cresford Developments also needs to close the south sidewalk and the parking lane on St. Joseph Street. This matter is dealt with in a companion report "Construction Staging Area - St. Joseph Street" requiring City Council approval. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - 1000 Bay Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71980.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1503 - Construction Staging Area - 1000 Bay Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71981.pdf) |
| TE34.104 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Commercial Loading Zone - St. Clair Avenue West |
| Bills 925 and 926 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the designation of a Commercial Loading Zone on the north side of St. Clair Avenue West, from a point 37 metres east of Oriole Road to a point 6.5 metres further east.
2. City Council amend the existing "Pay-and-Display" parking that operates from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, on the north side of St. Clair Avenue West, from a point 9 metres east of Oriole Road to a point 65 metres west of Deer Park Crescent, so that it operates from a point 9 metres east of Oriole Road to a point 50 metres west of Deer Park Crescent. |
| Origin |
| (July 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to establish a commercial loading zone on the north side of St. Clair Avenue West, fronting Premises No. 112. The commercial loading zone will provide for curb side loading/unloading opportunities for residents of the above-noted address, as well as other road users and businesses in the area.
The proposed commercial loading zone will operate at all times outside of the existing 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday stopping prohibitions. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Commercial Loading Zone - St. Clair Avenue West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71585.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1468 - Commercial Loading Zone - St. Clair Avenue West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71586.pdf) |
| TE34.108 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:21, 30 |
| Installation/Removal of Accessible Parking Spaces - August 2014 (Non-Delegated) |
| Bill 978 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces at the locations identified in Appendix A attached to the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
| Origin |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Installation/Removal of Accessible Parking Spaces - August 2014 (Non-Delegated)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72217.pdf) |
| TE34.125 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27, 28 |
| 15-Minute Parking - Sherbourne Street |
| Bill 948 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the current "No Standing Anytime" regulation on the east side of Sherbourne Street, between a point 123.9 metres north of Dundas Street East and a point 134.9 metres north of Dundas Street East.
2. City Council rescind the current "No Standing Anytime" regulation on the west side of Sherbourne Street, between a point 72.4 metres south of Gerrard Street East and a point 83.4 metres south of Gerrard Street East.
3. City Council enact a "15 minute parking limit" to operate at all times on the east side of Sherbourne Street, from a point 123.9 metres north of Dundas Street East to a point 11 metres further north.
4. City Council enact a "15 minute parking limit" to operate at all times on the west side of Sherbourne Street, from a point 72.4 metres south of Gerrard Street East to a point 11 metres further south. |
| Origin |
| (July 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to implement a 15-minute parking limit that would operate at all times within the existing lay-bys on Sherbourne Street between Dundas Street East and Gerrard Street East. The intent is to provide short-term parking opportunity for area residents, visitors and trades. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 3, 2014) Revised report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - 15 - Minute Parking - Sherbourne Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71591.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1471 - 15-Minute Parking - Sherbourne Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71610.pdf) |
| TE34.131 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| School Bus Loading Zone - Gerrard Street East |
| Bills 927 and 928 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a school bus loading zone on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between a point 20 metres east of Boulton Avenue and a point 24 metres further east, operating from 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except July and August.
2. City Council amend the pay-and-display parking regulations on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between a point 20 metres east of Boulton Avenue and De Grassi Street, to operate from 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to establish an additional school bus loading zone in front of Eastdale Collegiate Institute, on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between Boulton Avenue and De Grassi Street. The loading zone will facilitate curb side access for school buses during dismissal time between 2:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except July and August. Traffic operations and TTC streetcar service along Gerrard Street East will not be negatively impacted by the installation, however, the installation will result in the loss of four pay-and-display parking spaces during the school dismissal times.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - School Bus Loading Zone - Gerrard Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71893.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1493 - School Bus Loading Zone - Gerrard Street East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71894.pdf) |
| TE34.141 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Turn Prohibitions - Edwin Avenue at Dupont Street |
| Bill 949 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit eastbound right turns at all times on Dupont Street at Edwin Avenue (bicycles excepted).
2. City Council prohibit southbound straight throughs at all times on Edwin Avenue at Dupont Street (bicycles excepted).
3. City Council prohibit westbound left turns at all times on Dupont Street at Edwin Avenue (bicycles excepted). |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to prohibit turning movements to the south leg of the intersection of Edwin Avenue and Dupont Street (bicycles excepted). The proposed regulations will address operational concerns resulting from the narrow road width on Edwin Avenue and improve the access for cyclists to the West Toronto Railpath.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Turn Prohibitions - Edwin Avenue at Dupont Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71924.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1478 - Turn Prohibitions - Edwin Avenue at Dupont Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71925.pdf) |
| TE34.144 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Yorkville Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Yonge Street and Yorkville Avenue in conjunction with the removal of the pedestrian mid-block traffic control signal on Yonge Street, between Yorkville Avenue and Asquith Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to remove the existing mid-block signal on Yonge Street, between Yorkville Avenue and Asquith Avenue and to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Yonge Street and Yorkville Avenue 30 metres further north. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Yorkville Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72211.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1490 - Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Yorkville Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72212.pdf) |
| TE34.145 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Pedestrian Crossover - Carlaw Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of a pedestrian crossover on Carlaw Avenue at a point approximately 235 metres north of Queen Street East. |
| Origin |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to install a pedestrian crossover on Carlaw Avenue, in the vicinity of the mid-block TTC stops between Queen Street East and Dundas Street East.
The installation of a pedestrian crossover, at this location, is technically warranted based on the pedestrian volumes and delays and will assist pedestrians crossing Carlaw Avenue. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 19, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Pedestrian Crossover - Carlaw Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71502.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1436 - Pedestrian Crossover - Carlaw Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71503.pdf) |
| TE34.147 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:31 |
| Traffic Amendments - Area Bounded by Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road - Non-Delegated |
| Bill 950 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of a pedestrian crossover on Secord Avenue at Palmer Avenue.
2. City Council enact a one-hour parking regulation on the south side of Doncaster Avenue, from Main Street to Barrington Avenue, to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday.
3. City Council approve the installation of a taxicab stand for two taxis on the east side of Main Street, from a point 23 metres north of Danforth Avenue, to a point 11 metres further north.
4. City Council approve the road alteration on the north side of Doncaster Avenue, just west of Chisholm Avenue, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1507, dated July 2014, attached to the July 14, 2014 report, entitled "Traffic Regulations - Area Bounded By Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road", from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
| Origin |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
After extensive community consultation, Transportation Services has been requested by Councillor Janet Davis to implement various traffic improvements in the area bounded by Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road, more specifically, Palmer Avenue, Main Street, Doncaster Avenue, and Secord Avenue.
The proposed traffic regulations will promote slower vehicle operating speeds, improve visibility, and provide for a safer pedestrian environment in this area.
Other traffic proposals for this area are dealt with in a companion report "Traffic Regulations – Area Bounded by Lumsden Avenue, Dawes Road, Danforth Avenue and Main Street - Delegated" requiring Toronto and East York Community Council approval. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Amendments - Area Bounded by Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road - Non-Delegated
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71864.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1506 - Traffic Amendments - Area Bounded by Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road - Non-Delegated (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71865.pdf) Drawing No. 421G-1507 - Traffic Amendments - Area Bounded by Danforth Avenue, Main Street, Lumsden Avenue and Dawes Road - Non-Delegated (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71866.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Jon Stewart |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jon Stewart (TE.Supp.TE34.147.1)
|
| TE34.159 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Realignment of Permit Parking Area "41" to Exclude 1030 King Street West |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "4I", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (July 21, 2014) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to amend the boundary of permit parking area 4I.
Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of permit parking area 4I to exclude the properties located at 1030 King Street West as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 13, 2014. We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "41" to Exclude 1030 King Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72280.pdf) Appendix A - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "41" to Exclude 1030 King Street West (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72281.pdf) |
| TE34.160 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking - Davisville Avenue |
| Bills 916 and 953 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule A of Municipal Code Chapter 925 to incorporate the south side of Davisville Avenue, between Martin Road and Cleveland Street, on a street name basis, under the operating hours of 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., 7 days a week.
2. City Council approve the removal of the existing No parking 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday parking regulation on Davisville Avenue, between Martin Road and Cleveland Street. |
| Origin |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to introduce overnight on-street permit parking on Davisville Avenue, between Martin Road and Cleveland Street, on a street name basis, under the operating hours of 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., 7 days a week.
Area residents requested the implementation of overnight on-street permit parking on |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 21, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking - Davisville Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72244.pdf) Appendix A - Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking - Davisville Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72245.pdf) |
| TE34.162 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8I" to Exclude 181 and 220 Carlaw Avenue |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "8I", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (July 22, 2014) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District. |
| Origin |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to amend the boundary of permit parking area 8I.
Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of permit parking area 8I to exclude the properties located at 181 and 220 Carlaw Avenue as requested by Councillor Paula Fletcher. We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 22, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8I" to Exclude 181 and 220 Carlaw Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72274.pdf) Appendix A - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8I" to Exclude 181 and 220 Carlaw Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72275.pdf) |
| TE34.169 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to January 12, 2015 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant an exemption to Canada Running Series Foundation’s “Scotiabank Toronto Waterfront Marathon", Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's "Light the Night" and City of Toronto Facilities Management's "Civic Run" to solicit donations in support of their organizations.
2. City Council grant permission to City of Toronto Special Events "Nuit Blanche" to place objects in the reflecting pool.
3. City Council grant permission to City of Toronto Special Events "Cavalcade of Lights", "Nuit Blanche", Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's "Light the Night" and Rogers Broadcasting's "New Years Eve Bash'" to use open flame.
4. City Council grant permission to City of Toronto Special Events "Cavalcade of Lights", "Nuit Blanche", and Rogers Broadcasting's "New Years Eve Bash'" to use special effects pyrotechnics.
5. City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto through the Facilities Management Division for all the City of Toronto costs associated with the event. |
| Origin |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer |
| Summary |
It is recommended that Toronto and East York Community Council give exemption to Canada Running Series Foundation’s “Scotiabank Toronto Waterfront Marathon", Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's "Light the Night" and City of Toronto Facilities Management's "Civic Run" request to solicit donations, City of Toronto Special Events "Nuit Blanche" request to place objects within the reflecting pool, City of Toronto Special Events "Cavalcade of Lights", "Nuit Blanche", Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's "Light the Night" and Rogers Broadcasting's "New Years Eve Bash" request to use open flame and City of Toronto Special Events "Cavalcade of Lights", "Nuit Blanche" and Rogers Broadcasting's "New Years Eve Bash" request to use special effects pyrotechnics at their event to be held on Nathan Phillips Square. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 24, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to January 12, 2015
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72058.pdf) |
| TE34.172 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Outstanding Matters at 1 Hanson Street |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the Toronto District School Board to:
a. prepare a revised Traffic Management Strategy prepared by a professional transportation planner, in consultation with the broader neighbourhood, for submission to and acceptance by the Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District;
b. utilize the Facilities Management Review Team or create a separate Community Liaison Committee to develop the revised Traffic Management Strategy;
c. include in the revised Transportation Management Strategy the process by which ongoing traffic and other operational issues related to the Monarch Dome can be discussed and resolved as well as a posted protocol for complaint and dispute resolution
d. include in the revised Traffic Management Strategy formal provision for an annual review of the Traffic Management Strategy in consultation with the local community; and
e. report to Toronto and East York Community Council on the use of the free community hours as outlined in the Licence Agreement.
2. City Council request the Director of Transportation Services, in consultation with the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2015 with respect to the Toronto District School Board's proposed revisions to the 2012 Monarch Park Stadium Transportation Strategy, including confirmation that the matters requested by the Toronto and East York Community Council in Recommendations 1.a. to d. have been included in the revised Traffic Management Strategy.
3. City Council request the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2015 on any City requirements for events that are outside the hours of operation in the Licence Agreement. |
| Origin |
| (July 10, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
The Monarch Dome, at 1 Hanson, is a large state of the art commercial facility operating on the Monarch Park CI playing field. This commercial use was approved at the Committee of Adjustment.
Recently, the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) took the City of Toronto to court over the requirements of Committee of Adjustment approval for a similar dome at Central Tech.
On June 13, 2014 Superior Court Judge Corbett rendered his decision stating "intensive commercial use of recreational facilities could present significant traffic, parking, noise and even policing concerns". These are precisely the ongoing concerns of Monarch Park area residents about the Monarch Dome: traffic volumes and speed; parking; and the impact of all-night sports tournaments. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (July 10, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher - Outstanding Matters at 1 Hanson Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71655.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Jennefer Laidley, Francois Chartres, Rodney Branch, Hilary and Peter Gray, Kirk Hudson, Jason Langford, David Brown, Michael Osborn, Laurie Poole, and Karen Rapp (TE.Supp.TE34.172.1)
|
| TE34.173 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:31 |
| Consideration of the Official Plan Designation of Willis Blair Park During the Official Plan Review |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1 City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to review the Official Plan designation of the Willis Blair Park lands, formerly known as O'Connor Village Parkette, at 1570 O'Connor Drive during the statutory Five-Year Review of the Official Plan, with the intent to examine the appropriateness of re-designating these lands from Mixed Use Areas to Parks and Open Space Areas - Parks. |
| Origin |
| (June 26, 2014) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31, Beaches-East York |
| Summary |
The Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division operates the Willis Blair Park, formerly known as the O'Connor Village Parkette, at 1570 O'Connor Drive, a 1,129 square metre parcel of land owned by the City and located on the northwest side of O'Connor Drive near Skopje Gate.
While the Official Plan currently designates these park lands as Mixed Use Areas, which permits a variety of land uses including parks, most City parks are designated as Parks and Open Space Areas - Parks. The Parks and Open Space Areas - Parks designation generally limits land uses to those associated with parks and open spaces.
In order to more precisely reflect the Willis Blair Park as a City owned park, I am requesting that City Planning staff be requested to examine the appropriateness of re-designating these lands from Mixed Use Areas to Parks and Open Space Areas - Parks during the statutory Five Year Review of the Official Plan. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (June 26, 2014) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis - Consideration of the Official Plan Designation of Willis Blair Park During the Official Plan Review
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-71656.pdf) |
| TE34.177 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes |
| Communications TE34.177.31 to TE34.177.36 have been submitted on this Item |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
A. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:
1. Temporary liquor licence extension of the liquor sales licence for Mirvish Productions during the first four weeks of the production "Once" to be held at the Ed Mirvish Theatre, 244 Victoria Street, from February 10, 2015 to March 8, 2015, on the dates and times as follows:
Tuesday, February 10, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 11, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Thursday, February 12, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Friday, February 13, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Saturday, February 14, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Sunday, February 15, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 17, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 18, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Thursday, February 19, 2015 – 7:00 p.m. Friday, February 20, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Saturday, February 21, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Sunday, February 22, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 24, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 25, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Thursday, February 26, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Friday, February 27, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Saturday, February 28, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Sunday, March 1, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 3, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, March 4, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Thursday, March 5, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Friday, March 6, 2015 – 8:00 p.m. Saturday, March 7, 2015 – 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
2. Temporary liquor licence/patio extension for 420 Smokehouse, 420 Parliament Street, Toronto, during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on September 6, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
3. Temporary liquor licence for a Beer Garden during the Scotiabank AIDS Walk for Life Toronto to be held on September 13, 2014 at Yonge-Dundas Square from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
4. Temporary liquor licence extension to 4:00 a.m. for the Drake Hotel during Nuit Blanche to be held from 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 4, 2014 to 7:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014.
5. Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions during the Bloorcourt BIA Street Festival to be held on Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. for the following establishments:
African Palace Restaurant, 977 Bloor Street West Atlantis Restaurant, 1005 Bloor Street West Baltic Avenue, 875 Bloor Street West Bassline, 865 Bloor Street West Black Horse Pub and Grill, 928 Bloor Street West Bloomer's Bakery, 873 Bloor Street West Bloor Bar Café, 1050 Bloor Street West Christie Pits Pub (formerly Asseb Restaurant), 814 Bloor Street West Civil Liberties, 878 Bloor Street West Comedy Bar, 945 Bloor Street West Courense Bakery, 1014 Bloor Street West Disgraceland, 965 Bloor Street West Drift Bar, 1063 Bloor Street West El Cafecito, 3 Westmoreland Avenue Hogtown Vegan, 1056 Bloor Street West Hurricanes, 963 Bloor Street West Jankie's Place, 985 Bloor Street West Lalibela Restaurant, 869 Bloor Street West Menalon Restaurant, 841 Bloor Street West Mexitaco Restaurant, 828 Bloor Street West Monica's Bar and Grill, 881 Bloor Street West Nazareth Restaurant, 969 Bloor Street West Northwood Café, 815 Bloor Street West Opadrinho Snack and Sports Bar, 1026 Bloor Street West O Petisco Portuges, 1069 Bloor Street West Pero Restaurant, 812 Bloor Street West Ponta Delgada, 990 Bloor Street West Roma1090, 1090 Bloor Street West Saving Gigi, 859 Bloor Street West Sheesha Lounge, 901 Bloor Street West Tall Boys, 838 Bloor Street West Thai Green Chili, 1059 Bloor Street West Thai Room (Friendly Thai), 810 Bloor Street West The Piston, 937 Bloor Street West The Steady Café, 1051 Bloor Street West Tokyo Sushi, 1049 Bloor Street West Two Bite Saloon, 840 Bloor Street West Wisebar, 1007 Bloor Street West Zemen Sport Bar & Café, 842 Bloor Street West
6. Temporary liquor licence/patio extension until 4:00 a.m. on Sunday, September 7, 2014 for an event by Eone (Entertainment One Films) at the Moss Park Armoury, 130 Queen Street East, in conjunction with the Toronto International Film Festival.
7. Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions to 12:00 a.m. during the opening weekend of TIFF from September 4 to 7, 2014 for the following establishments:
Pearl King, 291 King Street West Ultimate Café, 293 King Street West Hey Lucy, 295 King Street West Kit Kat, 297 King Street West N'awlins, 299 King Street West Hush, 303 King Street West Gabby's, 309 King Street West Le St. Tropez, 315 King Street West Joe Mamas, 317 King Street West La Fenice, 319 King Street West Fred's Not Here, 321 King Street West Forget About It, 325 King Street West Z-TECA, 327 King Street West Paese, 333 King Street West
8. Temporary liquor licence extension (indoor only) to 4:00 a.m. for Opus Restaurant, 37 Prince Arthur Avenue, during the Toronto International Film Festival from September 4 to 7, 2014 and from September 12 to 14, 2014 only.
9. Temporary liquor licence extension for Just Desserts, 578 Yonge Street, during the Nuit Blanche Festival to be held on Saturday, October 4, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 5, 2014.
10. Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. each day during the 10th Anniversary of the special event hosted by Remington's Man of Steel at 379 Yonge Street, for TIFF elite invitees from September 5 to 7, 2014, (during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival).
11. Temporary liquor licence from 8:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 4, 2014 to 8:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 5, 2014 in the parking lot at 495 Wellington Street West, during Nuit Blanche for the first "Nuit Blanche Food Truck Fest"
12. Temporary liquor licence extensions to 4:00 a.m. for the following establishments for the Queen Street West BIA "Out of Site" event to take place as part of Nuit Blanche from 6:00 p.m. on October 4 to 6:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014.
Queen Mother Café, 208 Queen Street West Korean Grill House, 214 Queen Street West Wild Wing, 225 Queen Street West Everest Restaurant, 232 Queen Street West Cube, 314 Queen Street West The Rivoli, 334 Queen Street West The Beverley Hotel, 335 Queen Street West The Horseshoe Tavern, 370 Queen Street West The Cameron House, 408 Queen Street West Tortilla Flats, 458 Queen Street West Barchef, 472 Queen Street West The Hideout, 484 Queen Street West Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West Tequila Bookworm, 512 Queen Street West Rock Lobster, 538 Queen Street West Bovine Club, 542 Queen Street West Nocturne, 550 Queen Street West Rush Lane & Co., 563 Queen Street West
13. Temporary liquor licence extension from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. for The Crawford, 718 College Street, during the 5th Annual Toronto Beer Week from September 12, 2014 to September 20, 2014 (up to 4:00 a.m. on September 21, 2014).
B. City Council approve the following road closures:
1. Road closure from 7:00 a.m. on September 6, 2014 to 1:00 a.m. on September 7, 2014 on Bloor Street West between Dufferin Street and Montrose Avenue for the Bloorcourt BIA Street Festival.
2. Road closure on King Street West from University Avenue to Blue Jays Way during the opening weekend of TIFF requested by the Toronto Entertainment District BIA for temporary patio extensions to occupy the south curb lane on the south side of King Street West between John Street and Blue Jays Way, from September 4 to 7, 2014.
C. City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving the following, due to the timing of the event:
1. Temporary patio extension for The Eaton Chelsea during the 15th Annual Scotiabank Toronto Buskerfest Festival to be held on August 21 and 22, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., August 23, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and August 24, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council, under its delegated authority:
A. Declared the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:
1. Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 12 to 20, 2014 at the various locations.
2. The Royal Thai Embassy "Destination Thailand" to be held on September 14, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Yonge-Dundas Square.
3. "East End Crab Boil Part 2" to be held on August 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., in the parking lot of 110 Adelaide Street East, near Jarvis.
4. Food Truck Festival Ontario to be held on September 21, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Ontario Place.
5. "Vera Frenkel: Here, Now" Exhibition at the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art at 952 Queen Street West, to be held from November 6 to December 31, 2014 (Tuesday through Sunday) from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
6. Scotiabank AIDS Walk for Life Toronto to be held on September 13, 2014 at Yonge-Dundas Square, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., with beer garden.
7. African Gala Ball Dinner and Awards to be held on September 24, 2014, from 5:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at the Royal York Hotel.
8. Grolsch Open House to be held from September 4 to 8, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at 376 King Street West (during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival).
9. Royal Agricultural Winter Fair to be held from November 7-16, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. each day at the Direct Energy Centre, Exhibition Place.
10. 15th Annual Scotiabank Toronto Buskerfest Festival to be held on August 21 and 22, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., August 23, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and August 24, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., with street closures on Yonge Street from Queen to College.
11. "The Farm Lot Film Fest" to be held on Thursday, September 4, 2014 from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at The Detox Market, 369 King Street West.
12. Nuit Blanche to be held from 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 4, 2014 to 7:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014.
13. 2014 Molson Canada NHL Face-Off to be held on October 8, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m. at Yonge Dundas Square.
14. Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF)/Bell Box Activation to be held at David Pecaut Square from September 4 to 14, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., each day, noting that there will be private and public events in a temporary structure on the square.
15. AwesTRUCK 2014 Tune-up event to be held on Saturday, August 30, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the parking lot on the west side of the building at 495 Wellington Avenue West.
16. Bloorcourt BIA Street Festival to be held on Bloor Street West, between Dufferin Street and Montrose Avenue, on Saturday, September 6, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
17. Event by Eone (Entertainment One Films) occurring in conjunction with TIFF, to be held on September 7, 2014, at Moss Park Armoury, 130 Queens Street East, from 8:00 p.m. until 4:00 a.m.
18. Tides Canada "Not Far From The Tree", to be held on September 14, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Spadina Museum, 285 Spadina Road.
19. 10th Anniversary of the special event hosted by Remington's Man of Steel at 379 Yonge Street for TIFF elite invitees from September 5 to 7, 2014, until 4:00 a.m. each day (during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival).
20. Queen Charlotte's Birthday Ball to be held on January 17, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., at The Blue Barracks Hall, Fort York National Historic Site, 250 Fort York Boulevard.
21. Nuit Blanche Food Truck Fest to be held from 8:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 4, 2014 to 8:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 5, 2014, in the parking lot at 495 Wellington Street West.
22. Queen Street West BIA "Out of Site" event to take place as part of Nuit Blanche from 6:00 p.m. on October 4 to 6:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014 at various establishments.
23. Toronto Independent Game Jam (TOJam) event to take place on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. at XMG Studio Inc., 67 Yonge Street, Suite 1600.
B. Approved the following temporary patio extension, due to the timing of the event, and requested City Council to concur in the action taken:
1 Temporary patio extension for The Eaton Chelsea during the 15th Annual Scotiabank Toronto Buskerfest Festival to be held on August 21 and 22, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., August 23, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and August 24, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
C. Did not approve the request from the Bellwoods Block Party for the following events to be held from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, at a private dead lane at 198 Walnut Avenue (deferred by the Toronto and East York Community Council on June 17, 2014); and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission be advised accordingly
Sunday, September 7, 2014 Sunday, September 14, 2014 Saturday, October 4, 2014 (Nuit Blanch night edition) from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. |
| Summary |
Seeking endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes. |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (May 12, 2014) Letter from George Milbrandt, Toronto Beer Week, requesting that the Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 12 to 20, 2014, at various locations be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48416.pdf) (June 26, 2014) E-mail from Suranchana Pattamakowit, Royal Thai Embassy, requesting that The Royal Thai Embassy, "Destination Thailand" to be held on September 14, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Yonge-Dundas Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.2) (July 10, 2014) E-mail from Frank Kocis, Spotlight Toronto, requesting that "East End Crab Boil Part 2" to be held on August 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., in the parking lot of 110 Adelaide Street East, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.3) (July 18, 2014) E-mail from James Sandham, Theatre Operations Administrator, Mirvish Productions, requesting a temporary extension of the liquor sales licence of the Ed Mirvish Theatre, 244 Victoria Street during the first four weeks of the production "Once" from February 10, 2015 until March 8, 2015, at the dates and times noted in the e-mail from Mr. Sandham. (TE.Main.TE34.177.4) (July 3, 2014) E-mail from Ryan Stroble requesting that Food Truck Festival Ontario, to be held on September 21, 2014, from12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Ontario Place, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.5) (July 10, 2014) E-mail from Michael Vickers, Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art, requesting that an upcoming exhibition at the Museum, "Vera Frenkel: Here, Now", to be held from November 6 to December 31, 2014, (Tuesday through Sunday) from 12:00 p.m.to 6:00 p.m., at 952 Queen Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.6) (July 8, 2014) E-mail from Lido Chilelli, requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence/patio extension for 420 Smokehouse, 420 Parliament Street, Toronto, during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on September 6, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (TE.Main.TE34.177.7) (July 2, 2014) Letter from Kat Biondi, AIDS Committee of Toronto, requesting that Scotiabank AIDS Walk for Life Toronto, to be held on September 13, 2014, with beer garden from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at Yonge-Dundas Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.8) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48731.pdf) (July 22, 2014) Letter from Paris Rogers, Executive Director, Toronto African Film and Music Festival, requesting that the African Gala Ball Dinner and Awards to be held on September 24, 2014, from 5:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at the Royal York Hotel, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.9) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48732.pdf) (July 23, 2014) Letter from Scott Rondeau, Drink Inc. Events, requesting that Grolsch Open House, to be held from September 4-8, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at 376 King Street West (during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival), be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.10) (July 23, 2014) E-mail from Tim Lilleyman, Director, Hospitality and Special Events, requesting that the Royal Agricultural Winter Fair to be held from November 7-16, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. each day at the Direct Energy Centre, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.11) (July 21, 2014) Letter from Bonnie Taylor requesting that the 15th Annual Scotiabank Toronto Buskerfest Festival to be held on August 21 and August 22, 2014, from 12:00 noon. to 11:00 p.m., August 23, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and August 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a temporary patio extension for the The Eaton Chelsea during the event, and road closures on Yonge from Queen to College. (TE.Main.TE34.177.12) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48735.pdf) (July 25, 2014) Letter from Kim Keitner, Fresh City Farms, requesting that "The Farm Lot Film Fest" to be held on Thursday, September 4, 2014 from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at The Detox Market, 369 King Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.13) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48775.pdf) (July 25, 2014) Letter from Rena McDonald, Chief Financial Officer, Drake Hotel, requesting that Nuit Blanche to be held from 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 4, 2014 to 7:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. during the event. (TE.Main.TE34.177.14) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48776.pdf) (July 24, 2014) Letter from Justina Klein, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, requesting that the 2014 Molson Canada NHL Face-Off to be held on October 8, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m. at Yonge Dundas Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.15) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48777.pdf) (July 24, 2014) E-mail from Chanel Lavoie requesting that the TIFF-Film Festival/Bell Box Activation, to be held at David Pecaut Square from September 4 to14, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; noting that there will be private and public events in a temporary structure on the square. (TE.Main.TE34.177.16) (July 30, 2014) E-mail from Frank Kocis requesting that AwesTRUCK 2014 Tune-up event to be held on Saturday, August 30, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the parking lot on the west side of the building at 495 Wellington Avenue West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE34.177.17) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Simone Weir, Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair 2014, requesting that the Bloorcourt BIA street festival to be held on Saturday, September 6, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of temporary patio extensions for the establishments listed in the letter from Ms. Weir; and requesting approval of road closures from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on September 7, on Bloor Street West between Dufferin Street and Montrose Avenue for this event. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.18) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48750.pdf) (July 31, 2014) E-mail from Suzanne Turnbull, requesting that an event by Eone (Entertainment One Films) occurring in conjunction with TIFF, to be held on September 7, 2014, at Moss Park Armoury, 130 Queens Street East, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extension until 4:00 a.m. during this event. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.19) (July 30, 2014) Letter from Janice Solomon, Toronto Entertainment District BIA, requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the establishments listed in the letter, from September 4 to 7, 2014, during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival (which has been declared an event of municipal significance); and requesting approval of a road closure on King Street from University Avenue to Blue Jays Way, during this event. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.20) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48780.pdf) (July 31, 2014) Letter from Chantal Stepa, City Cider Events Coordinator, requesting that Tides Canada "Not Far From The Tree", to be held on September 14, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Spadina Museum, 285 Spadina Road, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.21) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48802.pdf) (August 5, 2014) E-mail from Tony Amaro, Opus Restaurant, 37 Prince Arthur Avenue, requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence/patio extension during the Toronto International Film Festival, to be held from September 4 - 14, 2014. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.22) (August 4, 2014) E-mail from Richard Fernandes, Just Desserts, 578 Yonge Street, requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. during Nuit Blanche Festival to be held on Saturday, October 4, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 5, 2014. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.23) (August 6, 2014) E-mail from Dave Auger, General Manager, Remington's Men of Steel, 379 Yonge Street, requesting that the 10th Anniversary of the special event that they host for TIFF elite invitees from September 5 to 7, 2014, (during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival), be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. each day during this event. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.24) (August 6, 2014) Letter from Kristine Williamson, Museum Outreach Officer, Fort York National Historic Site, requesting that the Queen Charlotte's Birthday Ball to be held on January 17, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. until 10:30 p.m., at The Blue Barracks Hall, Fort York National Historic Site, 250 Fort York Boulevard, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.25) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48843.pdf) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh recommending that the AGCO be advised that the City has no objection to the establishments listed in her letter receiving temporary liquor licence/patio extensions until 12:00 a.m. during the Toronto International Film Festival from September 4 to September 7, 2014. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.26) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48869.pdf) (July 30, 2014) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight City Events Inc., requesting that "Nuit Blanche Food Truck Fest", to be held on August 25, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a temporary patio extension in the parking lot at 495 Wellington Avenue West. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.27) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Spencer Sutherland (Chair) The Queen Street West Business Improvement Area requesting that 'Out of Site' Scotiabank's Nuit Blanche to be held on October 4 and 5, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., at various locations. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.28) (August 11, 2014) Letter from Jessalyn Taylor, XMG Studio Inc., requesting that TOJam to be held on September 13, 2014, at 67 Yonge Street, Suite 1600, 16th Floor, Rooftop Patio, from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE34.177.29) (August 12, 2014) Letter from Rebecca Caulford, Honeybea Designhive, requesting that The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on Sunday, September 7, and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, and on Saturday, October 4, 2014 (Nuit Blanche night edition) from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue, be declared events of municipal significance (deferred from the May 13, 2014 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council) (TE.Supp.TE34.177.30) |
| Communications (City Council) |
| (July 29, 2014) Letter from Noel Copeman, KXKW Director, seeking temporary extensions during "King by King West Music Festival" event from November 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2014 until 4:00 a.m. for various establishments listed in their letter dated July 29, 2014. (CC.Main.TE34.177.31)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49499.pdf) (August 14, 2014) E-mail from Clayton DuQuene, Manager, House-Maison, requesting temporary extensions of hours at House-Maison for the Toronto International Film Festival - September 4-14, 2014, until 4:00 a.m. (CC.Main.TE34.177.32) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49541.pdf) (August 5, 2014) Letter from Leanne Hederson, Real Sports Bar and Grill, requesting temporary extensions of Premise on Bremner Boulevard, located directly outside Air Canada Centre (west side) and Maple Leaf Square (east side) on October 8, 2014. (CC.Main.TE34.177.33) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49522.pdf) (August 18, 2014) E-mail from Larysa Kalyta, March? Restaurants Canada Ltd., requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the 400-Guest CIBC Event at MuvBox by March? (181 Bay Street, Toronto) on Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (CC.Main.TE34.177.34) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49523.pdf) (August 25, 2014) Letter from Kristy-Leigh Boone, Manager, Special Events Toronto Blue Jays, regarding the Toronto Blue Jays September Festivals to be held on September 12, 2014 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., September 13 and 14, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., on September 26, 2014 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., September 27 and 28, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (CC.New.TE34.177.35) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49614.pdf) (August 28, 2014) Letter from Andrea Young, Director, Food and Beverage, Gladstone Hotel regarding Nuit Blanche to be held on October 4, 2014 from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. on October 5, 2014 (CC.New.TE34.177.36) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-49662.pdf) |
| TE34.178 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 233-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street |
| See also Item TE34.9 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that
1. City Council receive for information the report (September 19, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, headed ""Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 223-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street". |
| Origin |
| (September 19, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division |
| Summary |
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 233-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value. Located on the southeast corner of College and Huron Streets, the site contains a commercial block historically known as the John Davison Buildings (1890).
At its meeting of June 18, 2013, the Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of TE25.59 "Preliminary Report - 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendments" until its next meeting on September 10, 2013 with a request that Heritage Preservation Services prepare a report to the Toronto Preservation Board on the heritage potential of the properties. On September 4, 2013, the Toronto Preservation Board received for information PB24.12, reporting that Heritage Preservation Services was unable to complete the heritage evaluation until later in the fall of 2013. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (September 19, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 233-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72550.pdf) |
| Speakers |
| Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (October 9, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol (TE.Supp.TE34.178.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48805.pdf) (August 8, 2014) E-mail from Max Allen, Vice President, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE34.178.2) |
| Declared Interests (Community Council) |
| The following member(s) declared an interest: |
| 178a | Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 233-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street |
| Origin |
| (October 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board |
| Summary |
The Toronto Preservation Board on October 3, 2013, considered the following:
1. Report (September 19, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 233-237 College Street and 189 Huron Street.
2. Communications: (October 2, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol (PB.Supp.PB25.5.1) (October 3, 2013) Submission from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol (PB.New.PB25.5.2)
The following person addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:
- Adam Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol (Submission Filed) |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (October 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Heritage Evaluation 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 233-237 College Street and 289 Huron Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72551.pdf) |
| TE34.190 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Motorcoach Loading Zone on Danforth Avenue |
| Bills 923 and 924 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council delete the existing 10-minute maximum parking limit in effect at anytime except 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 127 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 15.5 metres further east.
2. City Council delete the existing pay-and-display parking regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 42.5 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 127 metres east of Broadview Avenue, operating for a maximum period of three-hours from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday.
3. City Council delete the existing pay-and-display parking regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 142.5 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 29 metres west of Bowden Street, operating for a maximum period of 10-minutes from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday.
4. City Council enact a pay-and-display parking regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 42.5 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 119 metres east of Broadview Avenue, operating for a maximum period of three-hours from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday.
5. City Council enact a pay-and-display parking regulation on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 146.5 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 29 metres west of Bowden Street, operating for a maximum period of three-hours from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday.
6. City Council designate a bus parking zone to be in effect for a maximum period of 22 hours, from 6:00 p.m. of one day to 4:00 p.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday, and anytime on Saturday, Sunday and public holidays, on the south side of Danforth Avenue between a point 119 metres east of Broadview Avenue and a point 27.5 metres further east. |
| Origin |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher - Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
The Danforth Music Hall requires a motorcoach loading zone in front of the hall to allow tour buses to park during performances at the Hall. The Music Hall is an active member of the local business community, and the performances at this venue bring thousands of patrons to the Danforth on a regular basis. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher - Motorcoach Loading Zone on Danforth Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72715.pdf) |
| TE34.193 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Parking Amendment - Yonge Street |
| Bill 951 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommended that:
1. City Council approve the implementation of a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the west side of Yonge Street, from Glebe Road West to a point 15 metres further north. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's |
| Summary |
I recently met with residents of 20 Glebe Road West along with Transportation Services Staff to discuss concerns about cars stopping on the west side of Yonge Street - north of Glebe Road West. There are some legitimate safety concerns about the impact these vehicles have on the sight line for cars attempting to make northbound left hand turns from Glebe Road West on to Yonge Street.
Transportation Services Staff agreed that implementing a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the west side of Yonge Street from Glebe Road West to a point 15 metres further north could help address these concerns. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow - Parking Amendment - Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72677.pdf) |
| TE34.197 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 277 Belsize Drive |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings related to this application at 277 Belsize Drive before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances with respect to the property known as 297 Manor Road East was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on June 11th 2014. The applicant proposed to build a new two storey detached home with a rear second floor deck and integral garage at the front of the home. The applicant requires variances to allow a gross floor area of 0.75 times the area of the lot where 0.6 is permitted, a height of 9.5m where 9.0m is permitted and a rear platform of 2.66m above grade where 1.2m is permitted.
On June 11th 2014, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused this variance application.
The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a date yet to be determined. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 277 Belsize Drive
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72662.pdf) Attachment - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 277 Belsize Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72665.pdf) |
| TE34.198 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 297 Manor Road East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings related to this application at 297 Manor Road East before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances with respect to the property known as 297 Manor Road East was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on June 11thth 2014. The applicant proposed to build a new two storey detached home with a rear second floor deck and integral garage at the front of the home. The applicant requires variances to allow a gross floor area of 0.75 times the area of the lot where 0.6 is permitted, a height of 9.5m where 9.0m is permitted and a rear platform of 2.66m above grade where 1.2m is permitted.
On June 11th 2014, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused this variance application.
The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a date yet to be determined. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 297 Manor Road East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72663.pdf) Attachment - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 297 Manor Road East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72664.pdf) |
| TE34.199 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 358 Manor Road East |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings related to this application at 358 Manor Road East before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances with respect to the property known as 358 Manor Road East was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on July 9th 2014. The applicant proposed to build a new two storey detached home with a rear second floor deck and integral garage at the front of the home. The applicant required variances to allow a gross floor area of 0.738 times the area of the lot where 0.6 is permitted, a height of 10.14m where 9.0m is permitted, the first floor of 2.45m above grade where 1.2m is permitted, a rear platform of 1.95m above grade where 1.2m is permitted and the height of the front, rear and side exterior walls of 7.85m where 7m is permitted
On July 9th 2014, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused this variance application.
The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a date yet to be determined. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 358 Manor Road East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72666.pdf) Attachment - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 358 Manor Road East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72667.pdf) |
| TE34.200 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Request for a Planning Study to Address the Proliferation of Tall Replacement Homes with at Grade Integral Garages in Davisville Village |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Planning Division to undertake a neighbourhood zoning study of the Davisville Village, with appropriate community consultation and to report back the findings of the study with the zoning changes for the neighbourhood, if appropriate, to a statutory public meeting of the Toronto and East York Toronto Council. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's |
| Summary |
I have been working closely with the South Eglinton Ratepayers' and Residents' Association in attempting to protect the stability of our neighbourhood from development pressures involving “two storey homes with an integral garages". The proliferation of these tall infill homes that differ significantly that what is traditionally found in this area, creates unfair, negative impacts for residents of Davisville Village (for the purpose of this planning study being requested is bounded by Yonge Street, Eglinton Avenue, Merton Street and Bayview Avenue.)
This area in question is R Zoned (By-law 569-2013) and concerns have been raised by residents and the local residents association with regards to the development of two storey homes with integral garages that are both much larger, and higher than the existing traditional form of the two storey homes that in exist in the neighborhood. These homes are characterized by at grade garages that dominate the frontage of the home, that are not consistent with the prevailing streetscape of the neighbourhood.
The main floor is elevated well above grade, and none of the space below the first floor is considered liveable, and do not factor into gross floor area calculations. A two storey home with an integral garage is much larger, and higher than the existing traditional form of the two storey homes that have existed for many decades in the neighbourhood. These homes do not have direct access from the main floor to their backyards, and in most cases have platforms well above grade that overlook on their neighbours' properties.
We have successfully opposed several applications at the Committee of Adjustment in recent months, based on the rationale that the proposed built form of these tall replacement houses with integral garages are not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land that would respect the existing fabric and character of the neighbourhood. It seems appropriate to re-examine the zoning standards and provide recommendations with regards to amendments to the zoning by-law. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow - Request for a Planning Study to Address the Proliferation of Tall Replacement Homes with at Grade Integral Garages in Davisville Village
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72661.pdf) |
| Communications (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) E-mail from Max Allen, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE34.200.1)
|
| TE34.201 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Liquor Licence Application - Hadley's, 940 College Street, Toronto - File No. 202129 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Hadley's, 940 College Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bail?o, Ward 18, Davenport |
| Summary |
1910803 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 940 College Street operating under the name Hadley's (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a new liquor licence for an indoor capacity of about 67 patrons.
The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licensed establishments. There is concern in the community that this increase in capacity will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bail?o - Liquor Licence Application - Hadley's, 940 College Street, Toronto - File No. 202129
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72716.pdf) |
| TE34.202 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Liquor Licence Application - Levetto, 68 Sudbury Street, Toronto - File No. 816900 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Levetto, 68 Sudbury Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bail?o, Ward 18, Davenport |
| Summary |
1910804 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 68 Sudbury Street operating under the name Levetto (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a new liquor licence for an indoor capacity of about 60 patrons and an outdoor capacity of about 20 patrons.
|
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bail?o - Liquor Licence Application - Levetto, 68 Sudbury Street, Toronto - File No. 816900
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72717.pdf) |
| TE34.205 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Ceremonial Dedication of Wabenose Lane and Chechalk Lane as "Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation" |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommended that:
1. City Council direct that Wabenose Lane and Checkalk Lane be ceremoniously dedicated as "Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation".
2. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to post special honorary street name signs. |
| Origin |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale |
| Summary |
The purpose of this motion is to ceremoniously dedicate Wabenose Lane and Chechalk Lane as "Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation"
At its meeting of May 13, 2014 Toronto and East York Community Council (TEYCC) adopted a recommendation to name two public laneways in the area of Yonge Street and Gloucester Street as Wabenose and Chechalk Lanes. The naming proposal complied with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy.
In discussions with staff from Transportation Services no additional street name signs would be required to accommodate the dedication. In consultation with the Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association and with the consent provided by the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nations Council. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - Ceremonial Dedication of Wabenose Lane and Chechalk Lane as "Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation"
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72739.pdf) |
| TE34.206 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Traffic Control Signals - King Street West and Stanley Terrace |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the removal of the pedestrian crossover on King Street West at Stanley Terrace.
2. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at King Street West and Stanley Terrace, coincident with the removal of the pedestrian crossover. |
| Origin |
| (August 7, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District |
| Summary |
Transportation Services has undertaken an operational review and safety audit of the intersection of King Street West and Stanley Terrace. The intent of this review was to determine the effectiveness and benefit of retaining the pedestrian crossover (PXO) at this intersection against the need to replace it with traffic control signals to enhance operational safety.
The safety audit revealed that the pedestrian crossover is generally operating safely. Further evaluation has indicated that the justifications for the installation of traffic control signals are not satisfied at the intersection of King Street West and Stanley Terrace. Therefore, the replacement of the pedestrian crossover with traffic control signals is not recommended. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 7, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - King Street West and Stanley Terrace
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72740.pdf) |
| TE34.208 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Traffic Calming in Riverdale |
| Bill 952 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council extend the left-turn prohibition on Carlaw Avenue at Langley Avenue to the hours of 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. |
| Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information |
The Toronto and East York Community Council under its delegated authority:
1. Immediately reduced the speed limit to 30km/h on Victor Avenue, Withrow Avenue, Logan Avenue, and Langley Avenue within the area bounded by Broadview Avenue to the west, Carlaw Avenue to the east, Gerrard Street East to the South, and Bain Avenue to the north
2. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on the feasibility of installing an advance green turn signal at Carlaw Avenue and Gerrard Street East to permit southbound right turns during the morning rush hour and northbound right turns at all other times.
3. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to prepare a traffic report evaluating the installation of traffic calming speed humps on Simpson Avenue from Howland Avenue to Broadview Avenue.
4. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on the feasibility of implementing island parking on Riverdale Avenue between Broadview Avenue and Carlaw Avenue.
5. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on the feasibility of implementing double-sided parking on Simpson Avenue between Logan Avenue and Carlaw Avenue. |
| Origin |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
The Riverdale Traffic Working Group has been working diligently to develop a traffic management plan to present to their neighbours to address the issues of traffic volume and speed in their study area. The group has requested the study of certain measures, along with some traffic by-law modifications as an interim step. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 11, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher- Traffic Calming in Riverdale
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72798.pdf) |
| TE34.210 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Liquor Licence Application - Burdock, 1184 Bloor St. West, Toronto - File No. 202485 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Burdock, 1184 Bloor Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 18, Davenport |
| Summary |
2401155 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 1184 Bloor Street West operating under the name Burdock (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of about 176 patrons and an outdoor capacity of about 58 patrons.
The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licensed establishments. There is concern in the community that this new establishment will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailao - Liquor Licence Application - Burdock, 1184 Bloor Street West, Toronto - File No. 202485
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72806.pdf) |
| TE34.212 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 26 Belvia Road |
| See also Member Motion MM55.13 |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment approval of Minor Variance application A113/14EYK for 26 Belvia Road to the Ontario Municipal Board and authorize the City Solicitor, and all other appropriate City staff, to attend the OMB hearing in support of the appeal. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
The owners of the land municipally known as 26 Belvia Road applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a Minor Variance to permit the operation of an exotic animal shelter on the lands. On July 24, 2014 the Committee approved the Minor Variance application, notwithstanding a staff report recommending the application be refused.
There are concerns that the requested exotic animal shelter use is not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and is not desirable for the use of the lands. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 26 Belvia Road
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72814.pdf) |
| TE34.216 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:29 |
| Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 126 Fulton Avenue (File Number A0510/14TEY) |
| Community Council Recommendations |
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings related to this application at 126 Fulton Avenue before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position. |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis, Ward 29, Toronto-Danforth |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances with respect to the property known as 126 Fulton Avenue was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on July 29, 2014. The applicant proposed to alter the existing three-storey semi-detached building by constructing a rear two-storey addition with a rooftop deck and by converting the basement to a second dwelling unit. The requested variances to support the alteration were as follows:
- The proposed building would have a rear exterior main wall height of 9.22 metres when under By-law 569-2013 the permitted maximum height is 7.5 metres.
- The proposed building would have a floor space index equal to 0.97 times the area of the lot when under By-law 569-2013 the permitted floor space index for a lot enlarged by an addition is 0.69 times the area of the lot.
- The proposed building would have a residential gross floor area equal to 0.97 times the area of the lot when under By-law 438-86 the permitted gross floor area of an enlarged building is 0.69 time the area of the lot.
On July 29, 2014, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused this variance application.
The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a date yet to be determined. |
| Background Information (Community Council) |
| (August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 126 Fulton Avenue (File Number A0510/14TEY)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72840.pdf) Attachment - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 126 Fulton Avenue (File Number A0510/14TEY) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72841.pdf) Attachment - Notice of Hearing - Committee of Adjustment - 126 Fulton Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-72883.pdf) |
| New Business - Meeting 55 |
| CC55.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| National Energy Board Decision on Enbridge Line 9B Application - Follow Up Actions |
| Origin |
| (August 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor |
| Recommendations |
The City Manager and the City Solicitor recommend that:
1. City Council receive this report for information. |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto has participated as an intervenor in proceedings at the National Energy Board ("NEB") regarding Enbridge's Application to reverse the flow direction of its Line 9B, which runs through the north end of Toronto. Following the NEB's decision approving the project with conditions, Council directed that an information report be submitted directly to Council outlining City input to Enbridge on emergency preparedness measures applicable to Line 9B. This report is in response to that direction. |
| Background Information |
| (August 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor on National Energy Board Decision on Enbridge Line 9B Application - Follow Up Actions (CC55.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72849.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 25, 2014) Petition from Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Ward 8, York West, containing the names of approximately 627 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)
|
| CC55.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Appointment of an External Auditor for the Annual Compliance Audit of the Accountability Offices - 2014 to 2018 |
| Origin |
| (August 14, 2014) Report from the City Manager |
| Recommendations |
The City Manager recommends that:
1. City Council appoint Robert Gore and Associates as the external auditor to conduct an annual compliance audit for the offices of each of the City’s Accountability Officers for a five-year period for calendar years ending December 31st for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
2. City Council authorize the City Manager to award a contract to Robert Gore and Associates, being the lowest bidder meeting the terms and conditions set forth in Request for Quotation No. 9171-14-7105 issued by the Purchasing and Materials Management Division (PMMD) on June 6, 2014, to carry out the annual compliance audit for the offices of each of the City’s Accountability Officer for a five-year period for calendar years ending December 31st for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. |
| Summary |
This report seeks Council appointment of an external auditor to conduct an annual compliance audit of the offices for the City’s four Accountability Officers, the Auditor General, the Integrity Commissioner, the Lobbyist Registrar, and the Ombudsman, for a five-year period for calendar years ending December 31st for 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, as required by Section 3-8B of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 3, Accountability Officers. The contract with the current external auditor, Hilborn LLP, expires in 2014. This report also seeks Council authority for the City Manager to execute the contract with the appointed external auditor. |
| Background Information |
| (August 14, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Appointment of an External Auditor for the Annual Compliance Audit of the Accountability Offices - 2014 to 2018 (CC55.2)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72876.pdf) |
| CC55.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Maria Augimeri |
| To be considered as first item on Tuesday, August 26 |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner |
| Recommendations |
The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:
1. Council adopt a finding that Councillor Augimeri breached Article XIV of the Code of Conduct.
2. Council adopt the recommendation that no sanction be imposed on Councillor Augimeri.
3. City Council authorize the use of the Council General Expense budget to reimburse the complainant for actual and reasonable costs up to a maximum of $5,000 as provided in s. 11(2) of the Complaint Protocol. |
| Summary |
On March 24, 2014, a citizen filed a formal complaint with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner alleging that Councillor Maria Augimeri violated Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (“Code of Conduct”) as a result of comments made about the citizen by Councillor Augimeri in the print and online edition of a Toronto-based Italian language daily newspaper.
The complaint was classified as being within the jurisdiction of this office. This report concludes that Councillor Augimeri breached Article XIV of the Code of Conduct.
Councillor Augimeri provided a retraction and apology for the comment to be published in the community newspaper. She also provided her apology to the complainant, via this office. No further sanction is recommended as a result of this remedial action. |
| Background Information |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Maria Augimeri (CC55.3)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72911.pdf) |
| CC55.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Leak of Confidential Information Concerning the Appointments to Build Toronto |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner |
| Recommendations |
The Integrity Commissioner recommends that City Council receive this report for information. |
| Summary |
On July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013, City Council requested that the Integrity Commissioner investigate an alleged breach of confidentiality after a local newspaper published the Corporation Nominating Panel's confidential recommendations on appointments to Build Toronto. The publication took place prior to City Council's consideration of those appointments at its meeting held on June 11, 12, and 13, 2013.
After an investigation into the matter, I am reporting to Council that the source of the breach of confidentiality could not be determined, nor could it be ascertained that a member of Council was the source of the leak. An attempt was made to identify the possible source from the reporter who received the information and wrote the story: the request for an interview was declined. Counsel to the newspaper wrote to advise that the reporter would refuse to answer questions and that if a summons was issued, proceedings would be taken to quash the summons. Preliminary legal advice obtained from the City Solicitor's office was that a balancing would need to take place as between the public interest in such a disclosure and the value of the special place occupied by the media in relation to source-confidentiality and journalist-source privilege.
Other methods were attempted, including a request of all recipients of the confidential material to provide a declaration that the recipient had no knowledge or information concerning the leak of the confidential material. All but two members of Council executed the declarations: one declined to make a declaration on "principle" but confirmed in writing that he had not leaked the material. The second replied through staff that he did not feel that this applied to the Councillor because he was recovering from a health issue and did not attend Council.
The source of the leak could not be established and there is no information linking the breach of confidentiality to any named member of Council. However, confidentiality is important in the public interest and breaches are a serious matter. If Council wished to pursue the matter further, it is recommended that it consider the cost/benefit of pursuing the matter from the publication in question. This will inevitably lead to potentially protracted and costly legal proceedings. I advise that if Council wishes to consider that route, that it seek independent legal advice on the merits of the matter. |
| Background Information |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Leak of Confidential Information Concerning the Appointments to Build Toronto (CC55.4)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72912.pdf) |
| CC55.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Integrity Commissioner Annual Report - 2013-2014 |
| To be considered as second item on Tuesday, August 26 |
| Origin |
| (August 1, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner |
| Recommendations |
The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:
1. City Council waive Section 3.7 D of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers that requires policy-related reports to be submitted through Executive Committee and request the Integrity Commissioner to bring forward recommended changes to the Codes of Conduct for Members of City Council, Local Boards and Adjudicative Bodies directly to City Council in the new term.
2. City Council Request the City Manager, in consultation with the Accountability Officers, to review Section 3.7 D, of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers that requires policy-related reports to be submitted through Executive Committee and report directly to City Council in the new term with any recommended changes. |
| Summary |
The Integrity Commissioner reports annually to Council on the work of the office. This report is for the period from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014. |
| Background Information |
| (August 1, 2014) Integrity Commissioner Annual Report - 2013-2014 (CC55.5)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72919.pdf) Appendix 1 - Summary of Activities of the Integrity Commissioner: July 1, 2013-June 30, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72904.pdf) Appendix 2 - Report (May 8, 2014) from the Integrity Commissioner to the Executive Committee on Integrity by Design: Report on the Review of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72905.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 1 - Proposed Amendments to the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (Black Lined Version) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72906.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 2 - Proposed Amendments to the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (Clean Version) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72907.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 3 - Code of Conduct Declaration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72929.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 4 - Doner Declaration Form (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72930.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 5 - Travel Declaration (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72931.pdf) Appendix 2 - Attachment 6 - Gifts and Benefits Declaration Form (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72932.pdf) Appendix 2(a) - Integrity Commissioner Press Release (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72933.pdf) Appendix 3 - Section 160, City of Toronto Act 2006 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72934.pdf) Appendix 4 - Memorandum of Understanding between the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar and the Office of the Integrity Commissioner (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72935.pdf) Appendix 5 - Social Media Policy during 2014 Election (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72936.pdf) Appendix 6 - Integrity Commissioner's Office Budget and Expenditures (July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72937.pdf) |
| CC55.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| A Commitment to Oversight: Ombudsman's Five-Year Review 2009-2014 |
| To be considered as third item on Tuesday, August 26 |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Report from the Ombudsman |
| Recommendations |
The Ombudsman recommends that:
1. City Council receive the attached report as an information item. |
| Summary |
The Office of the Ombudsman opened in April 2009. The attached document represents a progress report on the office's development, its contributions, as well as its opportunities and challenges. The report reviews the increase in both the number and complexity of complaints and compares them against the lag in staffing and resources. It concludes the work of the office is not sustainable without a significant increase in budget. |
| Background Information |
| (August 19, 2014) Covering report from the Ombudsman on A Commitment to Oversight: Five-Year Review 2009-2014 (CC55.6)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72951.pdf) A Commitment to Oversight: The Origin, Mandate and Purpose of Toronto's Ombudsman - Five-Year Review 2009-2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72952.pdf) |
| CC55.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Initiating the Expropriation of 223 Gladys Allison Place |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes |
| Origin |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer |
| Recommendations |
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority to initiate the expropriation process to acquire the property interests listed in Appendix "A" as shown on the sketches attached as Appendix "B" (the "Lands").
2. City Council grant authority to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Lands, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to Council for its consideration.
3. City Council amend the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015‑2023 Capital Plan for the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division by creating a new capital account titled "223 Gladys Allison Place" with a budget adjustment of the amounts detailed in the Confidential Attachment 1, funded by the following reserve accounts: XR2213, XR2214, XR2216 and XR3026.
4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 once all properties required to complete the Willowdale Linear Park, including the Lands, have been acquired and arbitrations, appeals or settlements under the Expropriation Act have been determined, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to seek authority to initiate expropriation proceedings to acquire the property municipally known as 223 Gladys Allison Place. This property is required for the proposed expansion of Willowdale Linear Park. |
| Background Information |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Expropriation of 223 Gladys Allison Place (CC55.7)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72953.pdf) Attachment 1 - Confidential Information |
| CC55.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Report on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call Nos. 67-2013 and 152-2013 |
| The Lobbyist Registrar has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC55.8a for information) |
| Origin |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar |
| Recommendations |
The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:
1. City Council receive the findings in the attached report. |
| Summary |
In this inquiry, the Lobbyist Registrar has found that Jamie Besner of Sussex Strategy Group (“Sussex”), a registered consultant lobbyist, breached the Lobbying By-law by failing to report communications with public office holders and by communicating about two procurement processes when this was not permitted. In addition, Mr. Besner lobbied a public office holder after the related registered subject matter (SM18869) had been suspended. As a result, the Lobbyist Registrar has revoked SM18869 pursuant to § 140‑36B; and requests Mr. Besner to attend a training session provided by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar.
The Lobbyist Registrar has also found that Jeremy Bailey of Citygreen Urban Landscape Solutions (“Citygreen”), Mr. Besner’s client in SM18869, breached the Lobbying By law by communicating with public office holders about his company’s soil cell products when he was not registered as a lobbyist and by communicating about a procurement process when this was not permitted. This was Mr. Bailey’s first contact with the City’s lobbyist registry. He co-operated fully with this inquiry and attended an Office of the Lobbyist Registrar (OLR) training session on the Lobbying By law. In the interest of transparency, the Lobbyist Registrar has permitted Mr. Bailey to register and report all of his lobbying activities on behalf of Citygreen in SM19868.
The Registrar refers this report to the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division (“PMMD”) for information. |
| Background Information |
| (August 20, 2014) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call Nos. 67-2013 and 152-2013 (CC55.8)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72946.pdf) Report to Council on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call Nos. 67-2013 and 152-2013 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72957.pdf) (August 21, 2014) Supplementary report from the Lobbyist Registrar on Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call Nos. 67-2013 and 152-2013 (CC55.8a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73049.pdf) Appendix A - Email dated August 21, 2014 from Michael Binetti, Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73069.pdf) Appendix B - Letter dated August 21, 2014 from the Lobbyist Registrar (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73050.pdf) |
| CC55.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Report on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call No. 209-2013 |
| Origin |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar |
| Recommendations |
The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:
1. City Council receive the findings in the attached report. |
| Summary |
In this report, Lobbyist Registrar finds that three unregistered lobbyists breached the Lobbying By-law, §§ 140-10 and 140-41A by communicating with public office holders about a procurement process, Tender Call No. 209-2013 (the “Tender”), when these communications were not permitted by the City’s procurement policies and the procurement document. Two of the lobbyists were vendors who bid on the Tender. One of the lobbyists was acting on behalf of or in the interests of one of the vendors.
The Lobbyist Registrar refers this report to the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division (“PMMD”) for information; and requests all three lobbyists to attend training on the Lobbying By-law provided by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar (the “OLR”). |
| Background Information |
| (August 20, 2014) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call No. 209-2013 (CC55.9)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72958.pdf) Inquiry Report to Council on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Tender Call No. 209-2013 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72959.pdf) |
| CC55.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing purposes during the Council break - Events of Municipal Significance |
| Origin |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the City Clerk |
| Recommendations |
The City Clerk recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Clerk to consult with Councillors on requests arising in their wards for the designation of events as being of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes until Community Councils resume their meetings on December 4, 2014 and, upon agreement of the Ward Councillor, to advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) that the City has no objection to the event being declared an event of municipal significance. |
| Summary |
The purpose of this report is to authorize the City Clerk to process requests for designation of events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes until community councils resume their meetings on December 4, 2014. |
| Background Information |
| (August 20, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing purposes during the Council break - Events of Municipal Significance (CC55.10)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72970.pdf) |
| CC55.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Appeals of Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - 2131 Yonge Street and 32 Hillsdale Avenue East |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice subject to solicitor-client privilege |
| Origin |
| (August 19, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. Council adopt the recommendations in Attachment 1.
2. Council’s instructions to staff in respect of the Ontario Municipal Board hearing be authorized for public release at the conclusion of the Council meeting with the balance of Attachment 1 to remain confidential. |
| Summary |
This report addresses an Official Plan amendment and zoning by-law appeals that are now before the Ontario Municipal Board with respect to this development proposal. The Municipal Board conducted a mediation in relation to this matter and the City has committed to seek Council's instructions in that regard at the Council meeting commencing on August 25, 2014. |
| Background Information |
| (August 19, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Appeals of Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - 2131 Yonge Street and 32 Hillsdale Avenue East (CC55.11)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72968.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| CC55.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| 51-77 Quebec Avenue and 40-66 High Park Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report |
| Communications CC55.12.1 and CC55.12.2-260 (e-mails) have been submitted on this Item |
| Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege |
| Origin |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council provide instructions to City staff by adopting the Confidential Recommendations contained in Attachment 3 to this report.
2. City Council authorize the public release, at the end of the Council meeting, of the Confidential Recommendations in Attachment 3, if adopted by City Council. |
| Summary |
High Park Bayview Inc. ("Owner") proposed to demolish two existing blocks of townhouses, containing 16 rental units, and construct two new 26-storey residential apartment buildings and a two-storey amenity building at 51-77 Quebec Avenue and 40-66 High Park Avenue ("Proposed Development").
The Owner appealed the zoning by-law amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB") due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act.
Pre-hearing conferences were held on March 21 and June 6, 2014. There is a hearing scheduled for September 8, 2014 for 10 days to hear the appeal. It is urgent that City Council consider this matter at this time so that staff may receive instructions for the OMB hearing.
A settlement offer was submitted to the City Solicitor on August 11, 2014 which revises the Proposed Development that was appealed to the OMB ("Settlement Proposal").
Attached to this report as Attachment 1 is the planning review of the Settlement Proposal which was prepared by the City Planning Division. City Planning staff recommends acceptance of the Settlement Proposal. |
| Background Information |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 51-77 Quebec Avenue and 40-66 High Park Avenue with Attachment 1 - Planning Review of the Settlement Proposal and Attachment 2 - Proposed Settlement Site Plan (CC55.12)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-72950.pdf) Confidential Attachment 3 |
| Communications |
| (August 21, 2014) Submission from Jean Cormier and Rishi Sharma, High Park Coalition Executive (CC.Supp.CC55.12.1)
(August 21, 2014) E-mail from John and Colleen Poulos (CC.Supp.CC55.12.2) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Rishi Sharma (CC.Supp.CC55.12.3) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Yves P. Fournier (CC.Supp.CC55.12.4) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Drew Harvie (CC.Supp.CC55.12.5) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Maria Shakespear Miles (CC.Supp.CC55.12.6) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Chad Denyar (CC.Supp.CC55.12.7) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from John Klassen (CC.Supp.CC55.12.8) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Svetlana Lilova (CC.Supp.CC55.12.9) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from John Brian D'Souza and Christine D'Souza (CC.Supp.CC55.12.10) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Pamela Feigen (CC.Supp.CC55.12.11) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Effie Hotousiotis (CC.Supp.CC55.12.12) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Walter Prystawski (CC.Supp.CC55.12.13) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Timothy Holden (CC.Supp.CC55.12.14) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Gilles Gagnon (CC.Supp.CC55.12.15) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Dora Gugliotta (CC.Supp.CC55.12.16) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Christopher McKenna (CC.Supp.CC55.12.17) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Kristina Perschbacher (CC.Supp.CC55.12.18) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Lewis C. Lumley (CC.Supp.CC55.12.19) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Catherine Walther (CC.Supp.CC55.12.20) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Matthew and Simone Butters (CC.Supp.CC55.12.21) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Greg Dashwood (CC.Supp.CC55.12.22) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Zoran Susic (CC.Supp.CC55.12.23) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Samuel and Monique Teleki (CC.Supp.CC55.12.24) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Matt Rependa (CC.Supp.CC55.12.25) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Eleanor Batchelder (CC.Supp.CC55.12.26) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Sang Hyun Park (CC.Supp.CC55.12.27) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Edith M.G. Paul-Chowdhury (CC.Supp.CC55.12.28) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Delko Blazanin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.29) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Doug Flanders (CC.Supp.CC55.12.30) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Connie Salituro (CC.Supp.CC55.12.31) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from B.A. Patterson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.32) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Jeanne Vlasics (CC.Supp.CC55.12.33) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Peter Landstreet (CC.Supp.CC55.12.34) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Kamal Persaud (CC.Supp.CC55.12.35) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Liana Mori (CC.Supp.CC55.12.36) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Laszlo Sandor (CC.Supp.CC55.12.37) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Lillian Mierzwa (CC.Supp.CC55.12.38) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Judy Love (CC.Supp.CC55.12.39) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Maurice Kirkpatrick (CC.Supp.CC55.12.40) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Barry D. Adam (CC.Supp.CC55.12.41) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Ana Franco (CC.Supp.CC55.12.42) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Amy Ringrose (CC.Supp.CC55.12.43) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Gareth Ringrose (CC.Supp.CC55.12.44) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Craig Smith (CC.Supp.CC55.12.45) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Dylan Ringrose (CC.Supp.CC55.12.46) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Helen Heurter (CC.Supp.CC55.12.47) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Timothy Kuhn (CC.Supp.CC55.12.48) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Lindsey Warburton (CC.Supp.CC55.12.49) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Yuliya Antonov (CC.Supp.CC55.12.50) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Greg Lamar (CC.Supp.CC55.12.51) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Carm Galea (CC.Supp.CC55.12.52) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Pat Sparrer (CC.Supp.CC55.12.53) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Angela Carpenter (CC.Supp.CC55.12.54) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Pam Johnston (CC.Supp.CC55.12.55) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Jean Cormier (CC.Supp.CC55.12.56) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Kristian Truelsen (CC.Supp.CC55.12.57) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Anita Li (CC.Supp.CC55.12.58) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Aleh Shyla (CC.Supp.CC55.12.59) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Nadia Granova (CC.Supp.CC55.12.60) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Rolf and Mona Kesting (CC.Supp.CC55.12.61) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Pat Heslin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.62) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Marlene Jackson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.63) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from David Ritchie (CC.Supp.CC55.12.64) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from James Isbister (CC.Supp.CC55.12.65) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Sutton (CC.Supp.CC55.12.66) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Kerri L. Adams (CC.Supp.CC55.12.67) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Marcia Weaver (CC.Supp.CC55.12.68) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Allan MacDonald (CC.Supp.CC55.12.69) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Gwendolin Goodwin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.70) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Natalie Vukovich and Carol Vukovich (CC.Supp.CC55.12.71) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Diego Bordegari (CC.Supp.CC55.12.72) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer Sara Harrington (CC.Supp.CC55.12.73) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Nancy Shanoff (CC.Supp.CC55.12.74) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Rashmi Hegde (CC.Supp.CC55.12.75) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Yarwood (CC.Supp.CC55.12.76) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Shirley Fairley (CC.Supp.CC55.12.77) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from J. E. Kubin (CC.Supp.CC.55.12.78) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Suzanne Patterson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.79) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from S.L. Shaw (CC.Supp.CC55.12.80) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Eduardo Canel (CC.Supp.CC55.12.81) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Tom Donnelly and Sasha Jardine (CC.Supp.CC55.12.82) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Michelle Gabowicz (CC.Supp.CC55.12.83) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Wendy Carroll (CC.Supp.CC55.12.84) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Gloria Worth (CC.Supp.CC55.12.85) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Joan Cervin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.86) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Yarwood (CC.Supp.CC55.12.87) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Tatiana Kholyavko (CC.Supp.CC55.12.88) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Jana Orac (CC.Supp.CC55.12.89) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Fern Stimpson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.90) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from R. C. Terris (CC.Supp.CC55.12.91) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Anne Simms (CC.Supp.CC55.12.92) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Paula Ackerley (CC.Supp.CC55.12.93) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Marilyn Lightstone (CC.Supp.CC55.12.94) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Hilda Maraachlian (CC.Supp.CC55.12.95) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Victoria Granova (CC.Supp.CC55.12.96) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Pauline Walsh (CC.Supp.CC55.12.97) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Richard Row (CC.Supp.CC55.12.98) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Anita Bratch and Chris Dohle (CC.Supp.CC55.12.99) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Mary Korda (CC.Supp.CC55.12.100) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Libby C. Wong (CC.Supp.CC55.12.101) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Peter and Maria Victor (CC.Supp.CC55.12.102) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Derek McAllister (CC.Supp.CC55.12.103) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from George Reecer (CC.Supp.CC55.12.104) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Heidi Maurer (CC.Supp.CC55.12.105) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Debra Chandler (CC.Supp.CC55.12.106) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Mike Jones (CC.Supp.CC55.12.107) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Debra Chandler (CC.Supp.CC55.12.108) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from A. Smith-Henderson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.109) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from W. Henderson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.110) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Claudine Hartmann (CC.Supp.CC55.12.111) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Carolle Bright (CC.Supp.CC55.12.112) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Jean Hodder (CC.Supp.CC55.12.113) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Andrea Leven-Marcon (CC.Supp.CC55.12.114) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Sanja Todorovic (CC.Supp.CC55.12.115) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (CC.Supp.CC55.12.116) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Sandra Dunn and Wes Leewis (CC.Supp.CC55.12.117) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Liza Robinson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.118) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Deborah Martin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.119) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Edward Yarwood (CC.Supp.CC55.12.120) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Katalin Lovasi (CC.Supp.CC55.12.121) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Krista Wylie (CC.Supp.CC55.12.122) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Craig Hartogsveld (CC.Supp.CC55.12.123) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Elsa Cabral (CC.Supp.CC55.12.124) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Yana Artyushenkova and Gueorgui Chouldechov (CC.Supp.CC55.12.125) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Vicky Murrell (CC.Supp.CC55.12.126) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Daryl Gallant (CC.Supp.CC55.12.127) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Albert Yuen (CC.Supp.CC55.12.128) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Luba Kuzyk (CC.Supp.CC55.12.129) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Leslie McGrath (CC.Supp.CC55.12.130) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Tamara Bernstein (CC.Supp.CC55.12.131) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Emanuela Manenti (CC.Supp.CC55.12.132) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Anna Mancini (CC.Supp.CC55.12.133) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Evelyn Sommers (CC.Supp.CC55.12.134) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Yves P. Fournier (CC.Supp.CC55.12.135) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Silvia Franz (CC.Supp.CC55.12.136) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Tara Hunter (CC.Supp.CC55.12.137) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Airhart (CC.Supp.CC55.12.138) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Lorrie McIntyre (CC.Supp.CC55.12.139) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Katherine McGillivray (CC.Supp.CC55.12.140) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Elena Poulos (CC.Supp.CC55.12.141) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Teresa Hannigan (CC.Supp.CC55.12.142) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Georgina Rimmer (CC.Supp.CC55.12.143) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Prof. Dr. Viktor V. Palys (CC.Supp.CC55.12.144) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Mila Antonova and Alexei Antonov (CC.Supp.CC55.12.145) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Claudia Mykytiuk (CC.Supp.CC55.12.146) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Katherine Kaminskas-Palys (CC.Supp.CC55.12.147) (August 21, 2014) E-mail from Rick Hannigan (CC.Supp.CC55.12.148) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Larry Barwick (CC.Supp.CC55.12.149) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Bohdan Hanchuk (CC.Supp.CC55.12.150) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Aaron Lipson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.151) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Angelique Toews (CC.Supp.CC55.12.152) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Audrey D. Chudoba (CC.Supp.CC55.12.153) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Dennis Jones (CC.Supp.CC55.12.154) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Kordysz (CC.Supp.CC55.12.155) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ruth Malloy (CC.Supp.CC55.12.156) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Anna Iascone (CC.Supp.CC55.12.157) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Margrit Lee (CC.Supp.CC55.12.158) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Judy Love (CC.Supp.CC55.12.159) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ida McLaughlin (CC.Supp.CC55.12.160) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Daryl Angier (CC.Supp.CC55.12.161) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Mark Gundel (CC.Supp.CC55.12.162) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Emily Davidson (CC.Supp.CC55.12.163) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Hanna and Witold Sokolski (CC.Supp.CC55.12.164) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Dianne Bradley (CC.Supp.CC55.12.165) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Victoria Paradiso and Alejandro Ramirez (CC.Supp.CC55.12.166) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Daina Leja (CC.Supp.CC55.12.167) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Leigh Bowen (CC.Supp.CC55.12.168) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Karin Ruehrdanz (CC.New.CC55.12.169) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Phil Vlach (CC.New.CC55.12.170) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Richard Aaron (CC.New.CC55.12.171) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Laurie Godin (CC.New.CC55.12.172) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Lynne Ritchie (CC.New.CC55.12.173) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Susan Bolychuk (CC.New.CC55.12.174) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Donna Rutherford (CC.New.CC55.12.175) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Francesco Comisso (CC.New.CC55.12.176) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Janet Batchelor (CC.New.CC55.12.177) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Allison Dewhirst and Matthew Bowen (CC.New.CC55.12.178) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Bill Philipovich (CC.New.CC55.12.179) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Sally J. Wygant (CC.New.CC55.12.180) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Don and Ann Dewees (CC.New.CC55.12.181) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Karen Yukich (CC.New.CC55.12.182) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Sheila Morris (CC.New.CC55.12.183) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Tanya Spiegelberg (CC.New.CC55.12.184) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Robert A. Celsi (CC.New.CC55.12.185) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ken and Donna Kinlin (CC.New.CC55.12.186) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Marc Senderowitz (CC.New.CC55.12.187) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Tatiana Istomina (CC.New.CC55.12.188) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Maria Grande-Vaitekunas (CC.New.CC55.12.189) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Branka Komparic (CC.New.CC55.12.190) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Shoshana Fainsilber (CC.New.CC55.12.191) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Brian Edwards (CC.New.CC55.12.192) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from John Attard (CC.New.CC55.12.193) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Claire Lyons (CC.New.CC55.12.194) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Irmeli Veikkamo and Louis Gris (CC.New.CC55.12.195) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from John and Claire Hardie (CC.New.CC55.12.196) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Alexander Bernardino, Jean Cormier, Rishi Sharma, Barbara Yarwood and Marc Senderowitz, High Park Coalition Executive (CC.New.CC55.12.197) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Eugene Sziraky (CC.New.CC55.12.198) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Roberta Axworthy (CC.New.CC55.12.199) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Tara Christie (CC.New.CC55.12.200) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Marla Cheeseman (CC.New.CC55.12.201) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Werner Wichmann (CC.New.CC55.12.202) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Renate Dickman (CC.New.CC55.12.203) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Philip Emery (CC.New.CC55.12.204) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ian Kavanagh (CC.New.CC55.12.205) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ina Kavanagh (CC.New.CC55.12.206) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from John Keen, Arlen Keen and Brendan Keen (CC.New.CC55.12.207) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from D. S. Lightstone (CC.New.CC55.12.208) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Janet Haddock (CC.New.CC55.12.209) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Alexander Bernardino (CC.New.CC55.12.210) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Katherine Corfield (CC.New.CC55.12.211) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from John Mania (CC.New.CC55.12.212) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (CC.New.CC55.12.213) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Lindsey Love (CC.New.CC55.12.214) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Gerard MacLeod (CC.New.CC55.12.215) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Margaret MacLeod (CC.New.CC55.12.216) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from A Sad Panda (CC.New.CC55.12.217) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ian Kavanagh (CC.New.CC55.12.218) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Alejandro Ramirez (CC.New.CC55.12.219) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Stephen Kobryn (CC.New.CC55.12.220) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Wil Vanderelst (CC.New.CC55.12.221) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.CC55.12.222) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Colleen Donnelly (CC.New.CC55.12.223) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Debbie Van Vugt (CC.New.CC55.12.224) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Theresa Dillon (CC.New.CC55.12.225) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ronald M. Clark (CC.New.CC55.12.226) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Theodore and Janie Fischbacher (CC.New.CC55.12.227) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from David Macalpine (CC.New.CC55.12.228) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Janet Spivakow (CC.New.CC55.12.229) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Rosalyn and John Sutton (CC.New.CC55.12.230) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Ronald and Sherry Haynes (CC.New.CC55.12.231) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Brown (CC.New.CC55.12.232) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Anita Kokot-Larsen (CC.New.CC55.12.233) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer Laidlaw (CC.New.CC55.12.234) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Jane Wood (CC.New.CC55.12.235) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Jane Wood (CC.New.CC55.12.236) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Tatjana Marovic (CC.New.CC55.12.237) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Joanna Holt (CC.New.CC55.12.238) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Kasia Klepacka (CC.New.CC55.12.239) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Ann Dewees (CC.New.CC55.12.240) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Eleanor Adamowski (CC.New.CC55.12.241) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Igor Baglaenko (CC.New.CC55.12.242) (August 24, 2014) E-mail from Susan Berry (CC.New.CC55.12.243) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Pradeep Sharma (CC.New.CC55.12.244) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Darryl Burgwin (CC.New.CC55.12.245) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Gordon Beal (CC.New.CC55.12.246) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Alexandra Shaw (CC.New.CC55.12.247) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from John and Beverley Ellis (CC.New.CC55.12.248) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Shelley Glazer (CC.New.CC55.12.249) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Todd O'Connor (CC.New.CC55.12.250) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Wasela Hiyate (CC.New.CC55.12.251) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Ginzel (CC.New.CC55.12.252) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Pat Hicks (CC.New.CC55.12.253) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Julia Soberman (CC.New.CC55.12.254) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Cameron Bedford (CC.New.CC55.12.255) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Zoran Lazaroski (CC.New.CC55.12.256) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Evelyn Macerinskas (CC.New.CC55.12.257) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Cheri DiNovo, MPP Parkdale-High Park (CC.New.CC55.12.258) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Frank Delling (CC.New.CC55.12.259) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Elisabeth Bihl (CC.New.CC55.12.260) |
| CC55.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, East Bayfront and North Keating Precincts - Further Request for Directions Report |
| Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice or communication that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City |
| Origin |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor |
| Recommendations |
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 of this report;
2. If adopted, the Recommendations in Attachment 1 and Maps 2, 3 and 4 be released in the discretion of the City Solicitor as described in Attachment 1, with the balance of Attachment 1 to remain confidential. |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto passed the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (CWSP) in April 2003, and subsequently zoning by-laws for East Bayfront (By-law No. 1049-2006) and North Keating (By-law No. 1174-2010). Owners of six of the private development sites in the two precincts have filed appeals to the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and the area specific by-laws. At its meeting on July 8, 9, 10, and 11, 2014, City Council adopted confidential instructions to staff in the report (June 9, 2014) from the City Solicitor and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
This current report provides further advice regarding the confidential instructions approved by Council in July 2014, and seeks further direction respecting the appeals, to be dealt with at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing currently scheduled to commence on January 19, 2015, as set out in the Confidential Attachment. |
| Background Information |
| (August 18, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, East Bayfront and North Keating Precincts - Further Request for Directions Report (CC55.13)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-73022.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| Member Motions - Meeting 55 |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards an Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis |
| * City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014, waived referral of this Motion. City Council subsequently deferred this Motion to the August 25 and 26, 2014 meeting. * This Motion is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:
1. Upon the coming into force and effect of site specific by-law amendments for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue and for the lands known as 319 Carlaw Avenue, City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $45,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by $32,246.00 of Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700270) and $12,754.00 from 319 Carlaw Avenue (Source Account XR3026-3700371) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the grounds at Roden/Equinox Public School, and more specifically for the Outdoor Learning Commons.
2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.
3. City Council request the Director, Community Planning to co-ordinate preparation of the Community Access Agreement by the City Solicitor and to participate in preparation of the terms and conditions in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor as directed in Part 2 above.
4. City Council authorize City Officials to execute a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to support the Roden/Equinox Public School Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. Roden/Equinox Public School serves a diverse community and has been an integral part of the Coxwell and Gerrard neighbourhood since 1907. Over the years, it has undergone many structural changes to accommodate the growing needs of the student population and the community.
Roden was completely rebuilt as an open concept school in 1969 - all teaching areas open into a shared space called a "common area". Revitalizing the available green space and creating an outdoor learning opportunity is a priority for the school community. The revitalized outdoor area will feature a vibrant environment with extra seating, environmentally sensitive learning areas, native plantings and outdoor classrooms.
At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. In addition, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 413-2009 (OMB) respecting 319 Carlaw Avenue to reallocate part of the funds previously secured for park bench beautification towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. City Council further directed that any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements. With respect to the reallocation, City Council requested the Director, Community Planning to consider reallocation of the funds previously allocated toward specific projects that had not been spent, together with accrued interest, towards current community needs and to co-ordinate with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area. Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.
On June 17, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council (TEYCC) adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue. The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $75,000 of the funds collected under Section 37, together with any accrued interest, toward improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Boards for public access.
TEYCC also adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law Site Specific 413-2009 (OMB) on June 17, 2014, for the lands known as 319 Carlaw Avenue. The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $20,000 of the funds collected under Section 37 as follows: $7,246 for park bench beautification in the area of the site; and $12,754 for improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Board for public access.
This Motion proposes to provide a total of $45,000 of Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) towards the cost of the Outdoor Learning Commons at Rodent/Equinox Public School, upon the revised by-laws coming into force and effect and the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the TDSB for the capital improvements to the grounds at Roden Equinox Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
The Community Access Agreement to be signed by the TDSB will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at Roden/Equinox Public School. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the TDSB, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.1) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72380.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73264.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.2 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards an Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014, waived referral of this Motion. City Council subsequently deferred this Motion to the August 25 and 26, 2014 meeting. * This Motion is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. Upon the coming into force and effect the site specific by-law amendments for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue, City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $45,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700270) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the grounds at Morse Street Public School, and more specifically for the Morse Street Public School Outdoor Learning Commons.
2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.
3. City Council request the Director, Community Planning to co-ordinate preparation of the Community Access Agreement by the City Solicitor and to participate in preparation of the terms and conditions in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor as directed in Part 2 above.
4. City Council authorize City Officials to execute a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to support the Morse Street Public School Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School. Morse Street Public School is an urban school serving a diverse community in an urban setting. Revitalizing the available green space and creating an outdoor learning opportunity is a priority for both the school community and the surrounding neighborhood.
The revitalized outdoor area will feature a vibrant learning and social environment with extra seating, environmentally sensitive play areas and plantings.
At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. City Council further directed that any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements. With respect to the reallocation, City Council requested the Director, Community Planning to consider reallocation of the funds previously allocated toward specific projects that had not been spent, together with accrued interest, toward current community needs and to co-ordinate with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area. Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.
On June 17, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council (TEYCC) adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue. The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $75,000 of the funds collected under Section 37, together with any accrued interest, towards improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Boards for public access.
This Motion proposes to provide a total of $45,000 of Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) towards the cost of the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School, upon the revised by-laws coming into force and effect and the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the TDSB for the capital improvements to the grounds at Roden Equinox Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
The Community Access Agreement to be signed by the TDSB will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at Morse Street Public School. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the TDSB, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.2) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72385.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73263.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.3 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Creation of the first Dog Off-Leash Area in Ward 11, York South-Weston - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of a dog off-leash area within the Hydro corridor at the southwest corner of Woolner Avenue and Rockcliffe Boulevard. |
| Summary |
While there are certain lands within Ward 11 which, in practice, are used as a dog off-leash area, there is no designated dog off-leash area in the ward.
Over the years, Parks, Forestry and Recreation has considered fifteen possible sites for dog off-leash areas, with only one possible site meeting the criteria as set out in the People, Parks and Dogs Off-Leash Policy ("the Policy").
In June 2013, a Public Information Meeting was held to consider a proposal for a dog off-leash area at Woolner Park, which met all the criteria under the Policy. At the meeting, concerns were raised regarding the proposed area's proximity to the playground.
On Thursday, June 26, 2014, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, at my request, held another Public Information Meeting, this time to consider an area located within the same Hydro corridor as Woolner Park, at the southwest corner of Woolner Avenue and Rockcliffe Boulevard, for a dog off-leash area. While this location does not meet all the criteria set out in the Policy, there is ample room for a dog off-leash area and it is far away from the playground at Woolner Park.
The proposal for a dog off-leash area at the southwest corner of Woolner Avenue and Rockcliffe Boulevard was unanimously supported by the community at the Public Information Meeting.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.3) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.3
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72468.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.4 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 48 Thirty Fifth Street - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the consent and minor variances (B65/13EYK, A475/13EYK and A476/13EYK) for 48 Thirty Fifth Street, and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary. |
| Summary |
The owners of the land municipally known as 48 Thirty Fifth Street applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent (Application B65/13EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A475/13EYK and A476/13EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings.
On June 26, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.
There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed lot frontages and areas are out of keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood. Massing and setbacks are also issues of concern to neighbourhood residents.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.4) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.4
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72475.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent and Minor Variance/Permission Applications - 48 Thirty Fifth Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72920.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73262.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.5 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 29 Judson Street - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the consent and minor variances (A99/14EYK) for 29 Judson Street, and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary. |
| Summary |
The owners of the land municipally known as 29 Judson Street applied to the Committee of Adjustment to legalize and maintain six buildings constructed without building permits and requiring several variances (Application A99/14EYK).
On April 24, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.
The use of the site, for concrete batching, is currently legal non-conforming following the update of local zoning by-laws in March 2012. The operation has a long history of negative impacts on neighboring residents and properties which would be exacerbated by the requested variances.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.5) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.5
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72444.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application - 29 Judson Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72922.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73261.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.6 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:12 |
| Release of Section 37 and Section 42 Funds for upgrades and park improvements at the Amesbury Park Splash Pad and Rustic Park playground replacement - by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $62,778.42 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from 1555 Jane Street (account XR3026-3700024) and Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash In Lieu of Parkland Benefits for upgrades to the Amesbury Park Splash Pad and Rustic Park Playground replacement. |
| Summary |
Authority is being sought to amend the 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $62,778.42 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 Community Benefits funds (Source Account XR3026-3700024; $2860.69) and Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash in Lieu funds (Multiple Accounts; XR2213-4200101, XR2213-4200172, XR2213-4200169, XR2213-4200442, XR2213-4200434, XR2213-4200437, XR2213-4200438, XR2213-4200421, XR2213-4200429, XR2213-4200430, XR2213-4200529 for a total amount of $59,918.03) obtained in the development at 1555 Jane Street and various other Ward 12 developments for improvements to two park locations in Ward 12.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.6) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.6
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72483.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73260.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.7 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Liquor Licence - 2 Lakeview Avenue - Hanmoto - File No. 816786 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Hanmoto, 2 Lakeview Avenue (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. |
| Summary |
Hanmoto Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 2 Lakeview Avenue, operating under the name Hanmoto (“Premises”). The application is for a restaurant with a proposed indoor capacity of 30 persons.
The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.
This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.7) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.7
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72570.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.8 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, from 7-11 Burhamthorpe Avenue, and 3391 Bloor Street West, for Technical Design Services and Streetscape Improvements in the Village of Islington BIA - by Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $106,026.35 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the developments at 7-11 Burnhamthorpe Crescent, and 3391 Bloor Street West, (source accounts: XR3026-3700110 and XR3026-3700057 respectively) for professional and design services and streetscape improvements in the Village of Islington Business Improvement Area. |
| Summary |
The City is currently developing plans for the reconfiguration and improvement of the Six Points Intersection. As part of this project, the Village of Islington BIA has agreed to develop, in consultation with the City, streetscape improvement plans. The Section 37 funds will allow for the completion of technical design services for the streetscape improvements to be included in the tender package.
An Item recommending the expansion of the BIA into the Six Points Intersection area is also before Council at this meeting [ED33.2]. The expansion will allow the BIA to maintain the planned streetscape improvements project once constructed.
The following funding is available for these purposes:
- $2,271.35 from 7-11 Burnhamthorpe Crescent (XR3026-3700110); and - $103,755 from 3391 Bloor Street West (XR3026-3700057).
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.8) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.8
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72560.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73259.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.9 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37/45 Funds, from 760 The Queensway, and 1050 The Queensway, for technical design services and Streetscape Improvements in the shoptheQueensway.com BIA - by Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $41,910.47 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37/45 community benefits from the developments at 760 The Queensway and 1050 The Queensway, (source account: XR3028-4500142 and source account: XR3026- 3700014, respectively), for professional and design services and streetscape improvements in the shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area. |
| Summary |
The City has a long-standing partnership with the shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area (BIA). The BIA is proposing technical design services for their decorative poles, as part of a streetscape improvement project for 2014, however, there is currently no funding included in the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.
The funds were secured as part of a cash contribution in the developments for the purpose of streetscape improvements in shoptheQueensway.com BIA, and have been received by the City. The following funding is available for these purposes:
- $35,000 from 760 The Queensway (XR3028-4500142); and - $6,910.47 from 1050 The Queensway (XR3026- 3700014).
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.9) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.9
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72561.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73258.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.10 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Support of Private Member's Bill 24: Prohibiting Driving with Unlawful Handguns Act, 2014 - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council endorse Private Member's Bill 24: Prohibiting Driving with Unlawful Handguns Act, 2014.
2. City Council direct the City Clerk to convey City Council's endorsement of Bill 24 to the Province of Ontario. |
| Summary |
On July 23, 2014, M.P.P. Mike Colle introduced a Private Member's Bill proposing an addition to the Highway Traffic Act and an amendment to the Civic Remedies Act, 2011, making the act of driving a motor vehicle in which there is an unlawfully possessed handgun illegal, and introducing penalties for committing this offence.
The penalties proposed by Bill 24 for driving a vehicle in which there is an unlawfully possessed handgun are modeled after the street racing provisions of the Highway Traffic Act contained in the Safer Roads for a Safe Ontario Act, 2007. Upon conviction, a fine of $2,000 to $10,000 would be imposed, and/or imprisonment for up to six months. The driver's licence of a convicted offender would also be suspended for one year upon first conviction, five years for a second conviction, and indefinitely if convicted a third time.
In addition to the above penalties upon conviction, similar to the provisions of the Safer Roads for a Safe Ontario Act, 2007, the enactment of Bill 24 would allow police officers with reasonable and probably grounds to believe an offence was committed to request the surrender of the driver's licence and impoundment of the vehicle for seven days.
While this will not eliminate illegal handguns from our communities, it will be another tool for police to use in trying to keep these guns off of our streets.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.10) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.10
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72596.pdf) Private Member's Bill 24: Prohibiting Driving with Unlawful Handguns Act, 2014 (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72921.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.11 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 1100 Lansdowne Avenue (formerly part of 940 Lansdowne Avenue) to Parks, Forestry and Recreation for the purpose of improving the green space adjacent to 1100 Lansdowne Avenue - Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $52,696.03 gross, $0 net, fully funded by the Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 1100 Lansdowne Avenue (formerly part of 940 Lansdowne Avenue) (source account: XR3026-3700305), to fund open space improvements to the hydro corridor on the south side of Davenport Road, from Caledonia Park Road eastward to Lansdowne Avenue, subject to the following: that Hydro One enter into a lease agreement for the subject lands; that Hydro One review the design plans and approve of the installation; and that the local community group enters into a partnership agreement with the City to take on maintenance of the open space improvements. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to support the Davenport Village community to convert the derelict Hydro One parcel on the south side of Davenport Road bordered by Caledonia Park Road on the west and Lansdowne Avenue on the east, into a beautiful public space and gateway to the community.
The Davenport Village Community has undergone a tremendous transformation over the past 20 years from its original roots as General Electric Industrial Park. This evolution is well underway and continues with the addition of new green space, park amenities and the planned water splash pad.
However, one crucial piece still needs to be addressed in order to complete this transformation. The derelict Hydro One parcel on the south side of Davenport Road bordered by Caledonia Park Road on the west and Lansdowne Avenue on the east, needs to be converted into a public space and gateway to the community.
The Davenport Village has banded together to raise funds and create a vision but this task is very large and some assistance from the City is required to complete this mission.
A plan is to be provided by the community that is acceptable to Hydro One and Parks, Forestry and Recreation that includes components such as planter boxes with horticulture displays, ornate fencing, etc.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $52,696.03 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 1100 Lansdowne Avenue (formerly part of 940 Lansdowne Avenue) towards the capital costs for local parks or open space improvements to adjacent hydro corridors. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $52,696.03 to Parks, Forestry and Recreation towards the cost of assisting the community to complete this vision.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.11) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.11
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72880.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73257.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.12 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Transfer of Lease of 1119 Gerrard Street East to WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. from Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Ana Bail?o |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
1. City Council consent to the assignment by Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes to WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. of its interest in the Lease of 1119 Gerrard Street East on the condition that WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. assume the obligations of Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes under the Social Housing Agreement on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council direct the City Clerk to provide a certificate, in registerable form, to WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. pursuant to subsection 453.1(9) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. |
| Summary |
The United Church of Canada was formerly the registered owner of the property located at 1117-1119 Gerrard Street East. A five storey 29-unit social housing project was developed on that part of the property identified as 1119 Gerrard Street East (the "Housing Project"). The Church Leased 1119 Gerrard Street East to Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes. The Lease was registered as instrument no.CA342358 on April 26, 1995 (the "Lease") The Housing Project is operated by Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes.
On June 3, 2014 WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. acquired the fee title to 1117 and 1119 Gerrard Street East from the United Church of Canada and assumed the obligations of the landlord under the Lease to Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes. City Council provided its consent to that sale at its meeting on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014. WoodGreen now proposes to acquire the leasehold interest of Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes in 1119 Gerrard Street East. The Board of Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes has agreed to enter in an agreement of purchase and sale for that purpose. Council consent is required to the transfer of the Lease.
A Social Housing Agreement, dated August 24, 1992, (the "Social Housing Agreement") was registered as Instrument No.CA214010 on November 5, 1992, among Riverdale United Non-Profit Homes, as the Operator, the Trustees of the Riverdale Congregation of the United Church, as Owner and the Corporation of the City of Toronto. Pursuant to the Social Housing Agreement the Owner and the Operator agreed to provide housing accommodation to seniors of low to moderate income. The City registered a "Notice of Restriction" pursuant to the former provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 1988 (No. 2). These provisions have been continued under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. These require Council consent to transfer the Lease to another entity. The relevant provisions of the Social Housing Agreement state that:
1. The owner and operator will not convey any unit of housing in the development by way of deed or transfer or mortgage or charge any unit or enter into any agreement of purchase and sale respecting any unit without the written consent of the City.
2. Without such consent any agreement or conveyance does not convey or create any interest.
WoodGreen Community Housing Inc. is affiliated with WoodGreen Community Services, an innovative multi-service organization offering services across the range of social determinants of health, including child care, seniors support, housing, employment services, homelessness services, immigrant services, and mental and developmental health services. WoodGreen Community Services is one of the largest social service agencies in Toronto. A founding United Way of Toronto member agency, WoodGreen has grown to span 32 locations and serves 37,000 people each year. WoodGreen helps people find safe, affordable housing, seniors live independently, internationally-trained professionals enter the job market, parents access childcare, children and youth access after-school programs, newcomers settle in to Canadian life, homeless and marginalized people get off the streets and youth find meaningful employment and training.
Pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 2006 the City's consent is to be evidenced by a City Clerk's certificate, which may be registered on title.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.12) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.12
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72909.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.13 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 26 Belvia Road - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment approval of Minor Variance application A113/14EYK for 26 Belvia Road to the Ontario Municipal Board and authorize the City Solicitor, and all other appropriate City staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the appeal. |
| Summary |
The owners of the land municipally known as 26 Belvia Road applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a Minor Variance to permit the operation of an exotic animal shelter on the lands. On July 24, 2014 the Committee approved the Minor Variance application, notwithstanding a staff report recommending the application be refused.
There are concerns that the requested exotic animal shelter use is not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and is not desirable for the use of the lands.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.13) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.13
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72910.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 26 Belvia Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72938.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.14 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Toronto Islands Advisory Committee - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Parks and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on the establishment of an Advisory Committee for the Toronto Islands parkland, waterfront parks, and ferry service to these destinations, such report to include the recommended Terms of Reference and suggested membership. |
| Summary |
The Toronto Islands are the front porch of the City and one of the leading destinations for tourists and Toronto residents. Attracting more than 1.2 million visitors every year, the Islands are a favourite location for a variety of events and activities, as well as the home to a unique and vibrant community.
Similarly, as the waterfront receives investments and improvements in infrastructure, it is becoming a popular destination for events and recreation activities.
The ever increasing popularity of the Islands and the harbour has created many operational and logistical challenges. The programming of the public space on the Islands and the mainland has generated numerous conflicts among various stakeholders, and operational and customer service problems with the ferry service are having a negative impact on both daily and occasional users.
Some of the issues are dealt with in an ad hoc manner, and a long term strategy is required. The solutions to current problems, as well as anticipating future challenges and opportunities, can only be properly addressed through a formal planning process that includes numerous stakeholders, including local residents, area businesses, ferry user groups, and the yacht clubs.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.14) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.14
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72985.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.15 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Temporary licence to allow Eva's Phoenix (Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth) to make use of the City-owned parking area located to the east of Maude Street - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City, as licensor, to enter into a temporary parking licence agreement for the area shown in Appendix "A" as Parts 1 and 3 on Sketch PS-2014-069 with Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth, as licencee, at a nominal fee and for a term extending until December 31, 2015.
2. City Council authorize either of the Chief Corporate Officer or the Director of Real Estate Services to execute documents related to this transaction on behalf of the City.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the transaction, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the contemplated transaction on behalf of the City, including amending any dates and conditions, on such terms as the City Solicitor considers reasonable.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to this Motion. |
| Summary |
Eva's Phoenix (known formally as Eva's Phoenix Initiatives for Homeless Youth) is in the midst of a construction project to renovate the building located at 60 Brant Street for its long-term occupancy and use. The relocation of Eva's from its current premises on Ordnance Street to 60 Brant Street is projected to be completed by approximately December 2015. Eva's Phoenix is requesting permission to use a portion of the City-owned parking lot located to the east of Maude Street, on a nominal basis, during its renovation project in order to minimize disruption to the adjoining community from construction-related vehicles. This parking lot was previously used by City divisions that occupied the adjoining property known municipally as 497 Richmond Street West (505 - 511 Richmond Street West, 60 Brant Street and 17 Maude Street), but City staff have now relocated from that complex.
In this regard, it should be noted that Eva's is a charitable organization and a service provider under a Purchase of Service Agreement with the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.15) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.15
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72913.pdf) Appendix "A" - Sketch of Parking Area (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72939.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.16 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| 425 Belsize Drive - Appeal to Ontario Municipal Board of Committee of Adjustment?s Refusal Decision - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Filion |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings related to the application for 425 Belsize Drive before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and authorize the City Solicitor to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position. |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances with respect to the property known as 425 Belsize Drive was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on July 23, 2014. The applicant proposed to build a new two storey detached home with a rear second floor deck and integral garage at the front of the home. The applicant requires variances to allow a gross floor area of 0.74 times the area of the lot where 0.6 is permitted, a height of 9.5 metres where 9.0 metres is permitted, a rear platform of 2.59 metres above grade where 1.2 metre is permitted, and a height of all side exterior main walls of 8.2 metres, where 7.0 metres is permitted.
On July 23, 2014, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused this variance application.
The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a date yet to be determined.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.16) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.16
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72908.pdf) Committe of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 425 Belsize Drive (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72896.pdf) (July 18, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72897.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73256.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.17 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| AGCO Liquor Licence Application - 1806 Jane Street, Devon House Restaurant - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) that the issuance of a liquor licence for Devon House Restaurant at 1806 Jane Street (the "Premises") is not in the public interest and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request that the AGCO provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. |
| Summary |
An application for a liquor licence has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) for the premises at 1806 Jane Street, operating under the name "Devon House Restaurant" (the "Premises"). The application is for an existing restaurant with an indoor capacity of 40 persons.
The Premises is located within close proximity to residential properties whose residents should be consulted prior to the issuance of a liquor licence for this establishment. Concerns regarding noise and litter have been raised in the past regarding establishments in this area. As during an election year Members of Council are prohibited from holding community meetings after August 1st, proper consultation with the local community cannot take place. For this reason, the application for a liquor licence is not in the public's best interest.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.17) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion - MM55.17
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72914.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.18 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Continuing Toronto City Council?s leadership on gender inclusion - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communication MM55.18.1 has been submitted on this Item |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Government of Canada to change 'O Canada' to be gender inclusive, thereby including all Canadians. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to reaffirm City Council’s continued leadership and advocacy on gender inclusion by making O Canada gender inclusive. Toronto City Council’s leadership on gender equity can be traced to efforts by former Mayors who supported efforts to gain women’s right to vote, through use of civic facilities for meetings on Suffrage, through the elections of the first women as members of municipal councils in Canada (Constance Hamilton and Agnes MacPhail), and through the establishment of a Mayor’s Task Force on the Status of Women to respond to the Recommendations of the 1970 Royal Commission on the Status of Women. These historical commitments by City Council have been strengthened in numerous ways through a range of programs, policies and partnership programs with community organizations. In addition, the City of Toronto has been a leader in building the capacity of women to participate in public life through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Regional Champions Program.
To further recognize the rights of women to be represented in all aspects of society, women’s organizations and civil rights groups across Canada have endorsed the “Sing All Of Us” campaign which seeks to substitute the words “our sons” with “of us” in “O Canada”. First written in 1908, the original words of the Anthem were gender neutral, with words “thou dost in us command”. The words of “O Canada” were changed several times (1913, 1914, 1916, 1927 and 1980) by Judge R. Stanley Weir, who authored the original. It was not until July 1, 1980 that “O Canada” became Canada’s anthem through the National Anthem Act. There have been nine private member's bills since 1980 urging the Government of Canada to make the National Anthem gender inclusive.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.18) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.18
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72915.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Ed Lennox (MM.New.MM55.18.1)
|
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.19 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:25 |
| 2512 Bayview Avenue and 291-311 York Mills Road - Technical Amendment to By-law No. 284-2009 - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, Seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Bill 1035 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council amend By-law No. 284-2009 by replacing Section 1 (a) with the following:
1 (a) Uses not Permitted
no apartment hotels, taverns, theatres, assembly halls, banquet halls, clubs, commercial schools, billiard parlours, bowling alleys, motor vehicles sales buildings, or outdoor cafes shall be permitted; and no restaurants shall be permitted except one restaurant only which contains a maximum gross floor area of 624 square metres; which may sell wine and beer as articles incidental to the meal and which provides no entertainment.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to bring forward to the meeting of City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 for enactment by City Council, a by-law to make the change to By-law No. 284-2009 noted in Part 1 above.
3. City Council determine that, pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is to be given in respect of the changes to By-law No. 284-2009. |
| Summary |
At its meeting held on February 23, 24 and 25, 2009, City Council adopted North York Community Council Item 23.26, which recommended amendments to the former City of North York Zoning By-law 29589 to permit the construction of a second storey addition above the existing Shoppers Drug Mart located within the York Mills Shopping Centre at 2512-2540 Bayview Avenue and 291-311 York Mills Road. By-law 284-2009 was enacted by Council implementing the approved zoning by-law amendment.
It has come to City Planning’s attention that the provision in By-law 284-2009 pertaining to permitted uses contains an error. Uses that were intended to be prohibited in the by-law are listed as being the only uses that are permitted. The error was the result of a reformatting of the by-law prior to its submission to the City Clerk's Office at the Council meeting in which it was enacted. The zoning by-law amendment application that was approved by Council did not propose to amend the use provisions within Zoning By-law 29589, and the draft by-law attached to the Planning Report at the statutory public meeting reflected this. It is therefore appropriate that an amendment as set out in the Recommendations be made to By-law No. 284-2009 without the need for any further public notice.
This is an urgent matter since the by-law was enacted almost five years ago and further delay may cause hardship to tenants of the Bayview Shopping Centre.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.19) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.19
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72927.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.20 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Outdoor Liquor License Application - 1776 St. Clair Avenue West - Cuba Sport Bar - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") that the liquor licence application for Cuba Sport Bar, 1776 St. Clair Ave West (the "Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to Council's decision, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, public safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Summary |
An application for a liquor licence has been made to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") for the premise at 1776 St. Clair Avenue West operating under the name Cuba Sport Bar (the "Premises"). However, there is a great deal of confusion surrounding this application, as the store sign reads Cobra Sports Bar, but the liquor licence application is under Cuba Sports Bar, which many residents feel is disingenuous.
For the past few months, local residents have been kept awake during most weekends, public holidays and long weekends due to excessively loud music emanating from this establishment. Since the bar opened, it has been operating outside the scope and boundaries of its licence, as it has been operating similar to a nightclub rather than a bar.
This bar has been the source of many complaints related to: loud noise, public drunkenness, serving liquor and hosting after hours parties in the backyard area with amplified sound until the early morning hours, alleged drug dealing, littering the Cloverdale Road flankage and rear public laneway, loitering, and public safety concerns, which have seriously detracted from the success and vitality of the local business strip.
Most importantly, this is discouraging good people and families with young school-aged children from walking freely along the street and feeling safe, and they've reached a point now, where they can no longer tolerate or be subjected to this inexcusable behaviour any longer.
Furthermore, the Premises is located next to residential properties and there is great concern that the establishment will continue to be very disruptive for residents in the area. This application for a liquor licence is, therefore, not in the public interest and must be turned down.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.20) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion - MM55.20
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72916.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 25, 2014) Petition from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17, Davenport, containing the names of approximately 21 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (MM.New)
|
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.21 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Review of Approval Processes for Outdoor Events seeking Liquor Licences and Noise Exemptions - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communications MM55.21.1 to MM55.21.3 have been submitted on this Item |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to consult the Toronto Police Service, the Alcohol Gaming Commission of Ontario and relevant City divisions to review the approval processes for liquor licence permits, particularly for those at outside venues and with extended hours, such review should include:
a. an assessment to ensure the adequacy and availability of City resources, particularly emergency service resources, to respond in the event of single or simultaneous large scale events; and
b. making this information available to, and informing to, the approval and/or permitting processes.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to undertake a review of the noise exemption application process, including a review of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591, Noise, such review should include:
a. the exemption application and approval process;
b. the authority to refuse issuance of an exemption, should other factors determine unsuitability beyond relying upon the objection of the local Councillor;
c. the opportunity to include the Toronto Police Service in the circulation, where necessary; and
d. other relevant amendments to ensure the community is adequately protected.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to consult the Toronto Police Service and other relevant City divisions to discuss opportunities to enhance the sharing of information related to large scale events to assist in necessary planning and response. |
| Summary |
Throughout the weekend of August 1-3, 2014, an event was held at the Toronto Plaza Hotel at 1677 Wilson Avenue, in the outside parking lot. The event was included in a communication to Toronto-East York Community Council under "Endorsement for Events of Municipal Significance" (TE 32.74), as a part of the schedule of events for the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival. City Council, at its meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014 granted a non-objection for the beer garden event to be held on August 1 and 2, 2014 until 2 a.m.
An additional communication requested that August 3, 2014 also be included. The City Clerk subsequently wrote to the Alcohol Gaming Commission of Ontario advising of the non-objection to issuance of the permit for the three days.
The organizers of the event also obtained a noise exemption for the night of August 1, 2014, from 9:00 p.m. to 3:30 a.m. Based upon a non-objection, the exemption was granted.
On each of the evenings of August 1 and August 2, 2014, this event drew in excess of an estimated 7,000 attendees, and included an elevated stage and loud speakers with amplified music. The extent of the music being played had a significant impact on the residents that were in Wards, a notable distance beyond the event location.
It is important for the City to ensure that prior to the granting of permits or providing permissions/non-objections which allow these types of events to occur, that consideration is given to the ability of the City to adequately respond, ensuring that public safety is maintained, and to take steps to mitigate the impact these types of events may have on the surrounding communities, including the impact of noise.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.21) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.21
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72917.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 24, 2014) Letter from Karli Roopchan, Amanda Ottley, Shelly Richardson, Michael Ondieki, Kara Barratt, Chantal Langevin, Fatima Sisay, Krystal Tanner, Marguerite Clement, Avi Sharma, Lyanne Clarke, Cynthia Creighton, Sarah Supersad, Havolene Bennett and Janelle Carey (MM.New.MM55.21.1)
(August 24, 2014) E-mail from Karli Roopchan (MM.New.MM55.21.2) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Ashton Wanser, Dale McFarlane, Nicole Mohammed and Simone Vanessa (MM.New.MM55.21.3) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.22 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Request to Initiate the Process to Create an Off-Leash Dog Park Near S.A.D.R.A Park along the Hydro Lands - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to initiate the process to create an off-leash dog park in or near S.A.D.R.A Park (including the Hydro parcel west of the community allotment garden). |
| Summary |
Currently dog lovers in the area are left with little choice but to let their dogs run loose in the local Park and school yard causing unnecessary alarm, panic and trepidation amongst young school-aged children, mothers with strollers, and the elderly.
I concur with local residents that off leash Dog Parks offer important health benefits to our pets and to the community as a whole.
Off-leash Dog Parks have been attributed to helping clean up crime as the increased number of people especially during after dark hours act as a deterrent for people wishing to use the park for criminal activity.
Dog owners as a group are the most frequent users of parks, utilizing parks in all four seasons, in all types of weather, every day of the year.
As the local Councillor, I welcome these types of facilities and I will be submitting a petition, signed by over 100 residents, in full support of this initiative.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25, 26 and 27 as MM55.22) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion - MM55.22
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72894.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73255.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.23 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Fares to ride the Union Pearson Express (UP Express) - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communication MM55.23.1 has been submitted on this Item MM55.23 and MM55.30 will be considered together |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council request Metrolinx to set the fares for the Union Pearson Express (UP Express) at rates comparable to GO Transit fares.
2. City Council reiterate its preference for additional stops along the UP Express, including one at Eglinton Avenue West to integrate with the Eglinton LRT, and with other stops to be considered including Liberty Village, the Junction, Carleton Village, Jane Street, Etobicoke North, Woodbine and Humber. |
| Summary |
With the Union Pearson Express (UP Express) nearing completion, the as-of-yet unanswered question related to fares to ride the UP Express is soon to be answered. It has been estimated that the fare will be set at somewhere between $20-$30, with recent media reports indicating that the fare will include a $2 fee, to be paid to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, to offset parking revenue that will be lost.
Now is the time to reiterate the position previously held by City Council that the UP Express can and should serve citizens of Toronto in a way that is both accessible and affordable. By setting the fare at an amount of $20-$30, many residents of Toronto will not be able to afford this new connection to downtown Toronto and to the airport. In addition, it is unlikely that those working at the airport will be able to take advantage of this new opportunity to leave their vehicles at home as it will not be cost-effective or affordable to do so.
The UP Express as planned, with stops only at Bloor and Weston stations, has been set up to fail. With its limited stops and unaffordable prices, it is hard to foresee this line attracting the ridership necessary to support its operation.
City Council has previously advocated for the UP Express to be an integral part of the City's transportation network by expanding its services (i.e. adding additional stops) and ensuring the trips are affordable and in line with existing public transit alternatives (i.e. GO Transit).
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.23) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.23
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72987.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 26, 2014) Letter from Bruce McCuaig, President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx (MM.New.MM55.23.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49624.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.24 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 16 York Street (Block 9 Railway Lands East), for the Commemoration of the 40th Anniversary of the Toronto Book Awards - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Operating Budget for Transportation Services by $50,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured as part of the development at 16 York Street, Block 9 Railway Lands East (source account XR3026-3700415) for commemorative plaques or pavers within the Harbourfront community in the vicinity of the development to commemorate the 40th Anniversary of the Toronto Book Awards.
2. City Council request the Director, Public Realm, Transportation Services to work with Protocol Services, Harbourfront Centre, Heritage Toronto, Economic Development and Culture, the City of Toronto Book Awards Committee and the local Councillor on the design, production, and installation on this commemorative project. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks authorization to amend the 2014 Operating Budget of Transportation Services to apply $50,000, funded through an agreement made under Section 37 of the Planning Act. Section 37 funds have been secured and received in connection with the rezoning of 16 York Street, Block 9 Railway Lands East (By-Law No. 494-2009) for various community benefits including public realm improvements in the Railway Lands.
In 2014, the City of Toronto Book Award will celebrate its 40th anniversary. At present there are street pavers on Queen Street West which mark names and titles of previous recipients up to 1996. To commemorate the 40th anniversary of the City of Toronto`s Book Award, which is one of the oldest literary award programs in Canada, it is proposed that new plaques and pavers be designed and installed to recognize this anniversary and that all the previous recipients of this prestigious award be included. An initial installation is planned for fall 2014, including a plaque at Toronto City Hall.
This project has been endorsed by the City of Toronto Book Awards Committee, the International Festival of Authors (now in its 35th year), and The Word On The Street Toronto (now in its 25th year). Recently a literary hub has been established at Harbourfront Centre through the partnership established between the International Festival of Authors and The Word On The Street Toronto. In 2015, The Word On The Street Festival will be relocated to Harbourfront Centre.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.24) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.24
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72983.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73254.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.25 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Staff Report on How to Deal with Chronic and Repeat Complaints by Residents into the Toronto Police Service's Parking Enforcement Unit - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review the current ticketing policy with the Toronto Police Services Board and the Toronto Police Service's Parking Enforcement Unit, specifically relating to chronic and repeat complaints.
2. City Council request the City Manager to report to City Council on how Parking Enforcement Officers can deal with chronic and repeat complaints arising from a single individual, or group of individuals, where complaints appear to be vexatious in nature. |
| Summary |
The Toronto Police Service's Parking Enforcement Unit is responsible for enforcing parking related by-laws throughout the City of Toronto. Currently, where no parking regulations exist, the maximum allowable time for on-street parking is three hours.
Requests for parking enforcement along residential streets is complaint driven. The Parking Enforcement Unit enforces parking by-laws along an entire street even if a complaint is received concerning a single vehicle and all vehicles found to be contravening the three hour by-law are ticketed.
All requests for parking enforcement is followed up by the Parking Enforcement Unit officers and any/all repeat calls are strictly enforced without consideration for chronic and repeat complaints.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.25) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.25
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72926.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.26 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Escalating Insurance Rates and Challenges to Obtaining Insurance for Accessible Taxicabs in Toronto - by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to investigate and to report back to the Licensing and Standards Committee in the first-quarter of 2015 on escalating insurance rates and challenges to obtaining insurance for accessible taxicabs in the City of Toronto. |
| Summary |
In February 2014, City Council took decisive action and by so doing, became a world leader in taxicab accessibility by requiring that all Toronto taxicabs be inclusive and accessible within 10 years. This will allow all residents and visitors to access transportation by taxicabs for the same fare and in the same way as able bodied individuals; an equivalent level of service for everyone.
In July 2014, the City of Toronto began issuing the Toronto Taxicab Licence (TTL). The TTL is an owner-operated and wheelchair accessible taxicab.
The City requires that all taxicabs must have $2 million worth of comprehensive automobile insurance to cover loss or damage resulting from bodily injury or death and loss or damage to property resulting from an accident involving a taxicab.
Recently, members of the taxicab industry have voiced their concerns over the escalating cost of insurance and that some taxicab owners are being denied insurance coverage by various brokers/insurers, because of their wheelchair accessible taxicabs.
The Province of Ontario mandates that Ontario must be accessible through the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). The AODA specifically states that municipalities must provide on-demand accessible taxicab service. The Province, through the Ministry of Finance also regulates the insurance industry and licenses insurance companies through the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO).
The Registered Insurance Brokers of Ontario (RIBO) is the self-regulatory body for insurance brokers in Ontario and is governed by the Registered Insurance Brokers Act. RIBO regulates licensing, professional competence, ethical conduct and insurance related financial obligations of all independent general insurance brokers in the Province of Ontario.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.26) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.26
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72903.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.27 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Review of Liquor Licence - Weston Station, 1935 Weston Road - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") to issue a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the liquor licence for 1935 Weston Road – Weston Station (the "Premises") on the grounds that the past and present conduct of the Licensee affords reasonable grounds that the business will not be operating in accordance with the law and the operation of the business is not in the public interest.
2. City Council request the AGCO and the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the licence for the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO or the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to give effect to this Motion. |
| Summary |
For nearly five years now, Weston Station (the "Premises") at 1935 Weston Road has been the source of complaints by both residents and businesses in the community of Weston who feel that this establishment is a threat to community safety. I have received numerous complaints from residents about the conduct of patrons who frequent this "restaurant" as well as numerous allegations of criminal behavior including, but not limited to drug activity.
Weston Station has two entrances to the establishment – one from Weston Road and one from John Street. In the late evening and early hours of the morning, area residents report that patrons of this establishment stand outside the John Street entrance with beer bottles in hand. Evidence of this can be found in the morning as empty beer bottles are left on the ground.
I, on behalf of the community, have made several requests of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) to revoke the liquor licence that was issued for this establishment; the local Business Improvement Area has also written to the AGCO with their concerns but as of yet, Weston Station continues to operate and sell alcohol.
The Toronto Police Service – 12 Division has confirmed that this establishment is a crime "hot spot" for the Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West area and this was evidenced in the spring of this year when a stabbing occurred at Weston Station and more recently, on August 10, 2014, when a patron had his throat slashed with a knife, sustaining life-threatening injuries.
Since obtaining a liquor licence, Weston Station has been a constant source of problems for the Weston area; the community deserves better.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.27) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.27
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72900.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.28 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Manufacturers Limited Liquor Sales Licence Application - The Bottle Shop at Rainhard Brewing, 111-100 Symes Road - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:
1. City Council support the issuance of a Manufacturers Limited Liquor Sales Licence for the business located at 111-100 Symes Road. |
| Summary |
Rainhard Brewing is a new Craft Micro Brewery planned to open in Ward 11 by early 2015. As part of the operations at this new business, the owner intends on serving alcohol and for this reason, an application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) for a Manufacturers Limited Liquor Sales Licence.
As part of the application process for a Manufacturers Limited Liquor Sales Licence, the AGCO requires a resolution from Council in support of the issuance of the licence by the AGCO.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.28) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.28
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72902.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.29 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Taking Back Our Streets - Getting Toronto Moving Again - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Filion |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communications MM55.29.1 and MM55.29.2 have been submitted on this Item. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by February 2015 on the following:
a. the feasibility of eliminating the practice of allowing developers to occupy the public right-of-way;
b. the feasibility of increasing the initial upfront fee to developers for occupying the public right-of-way;
c. the feasibility of charging developers escalating monthly fees for occupying the public right-of-way; and
d. an update on Item MM 37.40 - Delivering Solutions to Gridlock - Ending Congestion Caused By Rush Hour Deliveries on Busy Streets, adopted by City Council at its July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013 meeting. |
| Summary |
Traffic congestion is a significant problem for Toronto's motorists, public transit users and cyclists. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently noted that the Greater Toronto Area suffers from the longest work commute times in North America. Estimates have put the cost of congestion to our City's economy at $6 billion a year while negatively impacting on the quality of life of our residents.
Of course, the long-term solutions to this problem include building a more accessible, affordable, extensive and efficient public transportation system in addition to encouraging car-pooling and other modes of travel. But, in the meantime, we must take every opportunity to ease congestion.
The practice of allowing developers to block lanes of traffic for construction negatively impacts motorists, surface transit users, pedestrians. This usage of our streets causes bottlenecks, backing up traffic several blocks on major arterial roads, and can lead to inconvenient and, in some cases, unsafe conditions for pedestrians and cyclists.
Toronto's streets must be used more efficiently. This Motion requests Transportation Services staff to study the feasibility of eliminating the practice of allowing developers to occupy a lane of traffic for construction.
This Motion also recognizes that the long-term goal of eliminating the practice of using lanes for construction may need some interim provisions to open traffic lanes for the public as quickly as possible. At present, there is little incentive for developers to keep their construction staging area on their own property rather than impose on public space, the applicant must pay a fee upfront and then a very minimal monthly fee thereafter.
This Motion further requests staff to look at the feasibility of increasing the initial upfront fee for blocking a lane to encourage developers to look for alternate solutions that do not negatively impact residents and the feasibility of escalating monthly fees for blocking a street lane to encourage developers to use a lane for the least amount of time possible.
In addition, staff are requested to follow up on MM 37.40 Delivering Solutions to Gridlock - Ending Congestion Caused By Rush Hour Deliveries on Busy Streets, which was adopted by City Council on July 16, 2013.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.29) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.29
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72928.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Policy and Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) (MM.New.MM55.29.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49568.pdf) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Michael Black (MM.New.MM55.29.2) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.30 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Making the Union-Pearson Express Fare More Affordable, Competitive and Fair for Toronto Residents - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communication MM55.30.1 has been submitted on this Item MM55.23 and MM55.30 will be considered together |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Manager to request Metrolinx to set the passenger fare for the Union-Pearson Express at a rate that is affordable for most Torontonians and competitive with other forms of transportation to Pearson Airport.
2. City Council direct the City Manager to request the Greater Toronto Airports Authority to not require Metrolinx to implement a $1.85 parking fee to the passenger fare for the Union-Pearson Express. |
| Summary |
Metrolinx's Union-Pearson Express line is a welcome addition to Toronto's transit network. For too long, our City has been one of the few world centres without rapid transit to its International Airport.
While residents are pleased that this critical infrastructure appears to be on budget and will be ready to open for the Pan Am games next year, they have some major concerns with emerging cost details that limit the accessibility of this line. These troubling details include potentially high fares and a fee in lieu of parking paid to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority.
While the passenger fare has yet to be confirmed, media reports have estimated that the new line could cost riders upwards of $30 per trip. This cost may, or may not, have an effect on business or international travelers but it would barely be competitive with taxis or limousines for residents. Common sense would dictate that if a resident living anywhere other than downtown (within close proximity to Union Station) can get picked up from their house and taken to the airport for about $50-60, they may opt to spend the extra money to avoid the additional time as the cost differential is not that substantial. Further, a couple or a family might find it actually more expensive to take the Union Pearson Express. The passenger fare must be made accessibile for Toronto residents.
Another troubling consumer cost detail associated with the Union-Pearson Express is the $1.85 fee passengers are being charged for not parking at the airport. The City of Toronto and other municipal governments in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area are actively encouraging residents to use public transit. This fee would penalize air travelers for making a choice that helps fight congestion. This potential fee runs counter to our public policy goals and should not be implemented.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.30) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.30
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72949.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 26, 2014) Letter from Bruce McCuaig, President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx (MM.New.MM55.30.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49618.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.31 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:10 |
| Irving W. Chapley Park Master Plan - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to report to the Parks and Environment Committee by the end of the first quarter of 2015 on the feasibility and process to develop a Master Plan for Irving W. Chapley Park that includes: enhanced integration with the existing Irving W. Chapley Community Centre and tennis courts; an inventory and state of good repair of existing facilities; consultation with the community; consideration of past and current plans as well as assessments and studies; and identifies relationships and responsibilities for the implementation and maintenance of planned improvements. |
| Summary |
Irving W. Chapley Park is a vital park in Ward 10 and an important community asset in the Bathurst Manor neighbourhood. The 4.6 hectare park is located south east of Finch Avenue West and Dufferin Street and features two baseball diamonds, three Bocce courts, two tennis courts, a ball hockey rink in the summer and an ice rink in the winter, basketball courts, a splash pad and multiple children's playgrounds. The Irving W. Chapley Community Centre can also be found at the park on Wilmington Avenue and includes an outdoor swimming pool and meeting rooms.
The park and community centre are used extensively by local residents as well as people from across Ward 10. While significant improvements have been made recently to the park in the past three years, there are many opportunities to transform Irving W. Chapley into one of the great community parks in the ity. The possibility of new development in the area further expedites the need to have a master plan in place to accommodate the potential increased use of the park.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.31) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.31
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72955.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.32 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| 350-352 Sheppard Avenue East - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision No. A209/14NY - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on the appeal of Application No. A209/14NY with respect to 350-352 Sheppard Avenue East, to:
a. should the Ontario Municipal Board determine that the proposed restaurant use is appropriate having satisfied the four tests under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, request the Board to impose as a condition to such use variance that the restaurant use only be permitted on the ground floor of the building and be limited to a maximum of 75.8 square metres of floor area; and
b. oppose any variances which may arise in relation to required parking spaces.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as may be necessary. |
| Summary |
Application No. A209/14NY was submitted to the Committee of Adjustment North Panel by Larkin and Associates Planning Consultants Inc, on behalf of 2140322 Ontario Limited, to allow a restaurant as a permitted use at 350-352 Sheppard Avenue East.
On April 30, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused this application on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variance was not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variance was not minor. On May 20, 2014, the applicant appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.32) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.32
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72998.pdf) Public Hearing Notice on Minor Variance/Permission for 350 and 352 Sheppard Avenue East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72999.pdf) Committee of Adjustment North York District - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 350 and 352 Sheppard Avenue East (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73000.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73253.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.33 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Adjustments to the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget to fund the Expropriation of 63 Princess Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council amend the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget by funding the addition of a project known as "63 Princess Avenue Expropriation" for $2,200,000.00, including all fees and disbursements for the property, with funding provided from the Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund – City Wide Land Acquisition (XR2210) when successful negotiations are completed.
2. City Council direct that funds drawn from the Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund - City Wide Land Acquisition (XR2210) in the amount of $2,200,000.00 be repaid within a two year period through allocation of future Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication from developments generated in the Ward. |
| Summary |
City Council authorized City staff to initiate the expropriation of 63 Princess Avenue at its meeting held on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014. A Notice of Application to Expropriate was sent to the property owner on May 22, 2014. The property owner did not request a Hearing of Necessity, as per the Expropriations Act (R.S.O. 1990). The City is now in a position to move forward with acquiring the property from the owner by means of settlement or full expropriation. In order to do so, funding must be available in an approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation capital account. It is requested that City Council amend the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget with funding provided from the Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund – City Wide Land Acquisition and it is expected that the funding drawn from the City Wide Land Acquisition account to expropriate 63 Princess Avenue will be fully replenished through the anticipated volume of developments to be generated within Ward 23.
Lee Lifeson Art Park (name pending Council approval) was created by adding lands of 47 Princess, 45 Princess, 52 Hillcrest, and 78 Hillcrest, to the portion of Willowdale Linear Park between Princess and Hillcrest. The City is also seeking authority to expropriate 223 Gladys Allison Place for the expansion of the park. The acquisition of 63 Princess will help unify the park by increasing the narrow area which currently connects the northern and southern halves of the park. The lands of 63 Princess also provide opportunities to place art in other areas of the park, provide a quieter/alternate walkway and seating experience, as well as provide better screening opportunities for adjacent property owners.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.33) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.33
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72947.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73252.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.34 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Impact of the use of established grade in relation to height variances - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee in January 2015 on how to improve By-law 569-2013 in order to preserve the established character of the Willowdale neighbourhood and other similar neighbourhoods with respect to the physical height of the buildings, the positioning of the front entrances to the homes and the position of the garage entrances in relation to the entrance to the home. |
| Summary |
Under Zoning By-law 7625, variances relating to height were measured from the crown of the road in front of the subject property. Under Zoning By-law 569-2013, implemented last May, these variances are now measured from established grade, which is taken by averaging the grade 1 centimetre from the property line on the two neighbouring properties.
We are receiving multiple Committee of Adjustment Applications which include significant lowering of the grade on the subject properties. This results in certain measurements being taken from a point higher than the actual base of the proposed home, and has led to the following issues:
a. homes which are physically taller than their measured height under the by-law;
b. front entrances with more than 6 risers, despite complying with the first floor height requirement of 1.2 m.; and
c. garage entrances being lower in relation to the front entrance, despite the first floor height requirement being met and the driveway maintaining a positive slope.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.34) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.34
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72948.pdf) Attachment to Motion - Example of Established Grade (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73054.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.35 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Liquor Licence Application - 1900 The Queensway, Jack Astor's Bar and Grill - File # 24725 - by Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 1900 The Queensway, operating under the name "Jack Astor's Bar and Grill" (“Premises”), is in the public interest subject to the applicant or all managers of the premises having taken the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Safer Bars Program within 12 months of the issuance of the liquor licence. |
| Summary |
On April 1, 2 and 3, 2014 City Council directed the City Clerk to declare each liquor licence application not in the public interest unless the applicant submits proof that they have taken the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Safer Bars Program and a letter of support from their local MPP. Since this decision, many Toronto area MPPs are refusing to provide these letters of support based on the advice of the Provincial Integrity Commissioner leaving many applicants in limbo.
In the absence of a shift in City Council policy, Council must now address each application individually. As this is the last Council meeting of the term it is urgent that City Council deal with this Motion or see it pushed back until December.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.35) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.35
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72960.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.36 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Sign By-law Enforcement - Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to report to the first meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee in 2015 on modifications to Toronto Building's existing enforcement strategy for Chapter 694 necessary to improve enforcement efforts concerning first party signs erected in contravention of Chapter 694; such report to include a review of the use of issuing certificates of offence under Part 1 of the Provincial Offences Act, as well as the enforcement tools available under Part 3 of the Provincial Offences Act, and any amendments to the Municipal Code, Chapter 694 which may be required to expand the tools available for enforcement, including changes to the minimum fines in Chapter 694. |
| Summary |
In recent years there has been a proliferation of illegal signs in many parts of the City. Based on discussions I have had with Toronto Building staff responsible for the Sign By-law, it would be helpful for them to have additional tools to provide more effective and less time consuming enforcement.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.36) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.36
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72969.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.37 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Liquor Licence Application- 3481 Lake Shore Boulevard West, Fogarty's - File # 814669 - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 3481 Lake Shore Boulevard West, operating under the name "Fogarty's" (“Premises”), is in the public interest subject to the applicant or all managers of the premises having taken the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Safer Bars program within 12 months of the issuance of the liquor licence. |
| Summary |
On April 1, 2 and 3, 2014 City Council directed the City Clerk to declare each liquor licence application not in the public interest unless the applicant submits proof that they have taken the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Safer Bars Program and a letter of support from their local MPP. Since this decision, many Toronto area MPPs are refusing to provide these letters of support based on the advice of the Provincial Integrity Commissioner leaving many applicants in limbo.
In the absence of a shift in City Council policy, Council must now address each application individually. As this is the last Council meeting of the term it is urgent that City Council deal with this Motion or see it pushed back until December.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.37) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.37
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72961.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.38 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Pilot expansion of "Watch your Speed" program: evaluating longer term effect of speed display boards adjacent to schools - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor John Parker |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to purchase, install and operate ten new speed measurement and display signs, on a permanent basis, as a pilot extension to the "Watch Your Speed" program, as soon as is practical.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to City Council in the Fall of 2015 on the effectiveness of the pilot project, and the costs and resources required to operate the pilot project. |
| Summary |
The City's "Watch Your Speed" program consists of portable speed measurement and display signs which advise motorists of their operating speeds. The objective of this program is to advise drivers when driving behaviour requires alteration. The current program, which has been in effect since 2001, involves rotating four (4) speed measurement and display devices weekly to locations where speed concerns have been expressed.
This Motion proposes a pilot extension of the "Watch Your Speed" program, to provide motorists with increased attention to driving behaviour in school zones. The pilot will include the purchase, installation, operation and effectiveness evaluation of ten (10) permanent "Watch Your Speed" devices adjacent to school areas. The ten speed measurement and display signs will remain in operation throughout the pilot project. At the conclusion of the pilot project, the General Manager, Transportation Services will be required to report back to City Council, in the Fall of 2015 on the pilot effectiveness, costs and resource requirement of operating this pilot project.
By operating speed measurement and display signs at locations on a long term pilot basis, passing motorists will be constantly reminded of their driving behaviour in school zones. The pilot will also provide the opportunity to measure and quantify long term effectiveness, which would be required to justify a potential permanent expansion to the "Watch Your Speed" program.
At its meeting on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014, City Council approved a strategy to improve and promote pedestrian safety in school zones. Five of the nine school cluster safety reviews, detailed in Attachment 2 of the PW31.11 report are located within the North York Community Council area. As such and in order to maximize the efficiency of staff involved in the pilot program the locations included in the pilot project will be located relatively close to one another. Three of the pilot locations will include schools closely located to recent school age traffic fatalities, in Wards 36, 8 and 26. The remaining seven pilot locations will be located within Ward 23.
The equipment purchase portion of this Motion has been estimated at approximately $50,000 which is available within the approved Transportation Services Capital Budget account CTP 714-07. The cost to install, maintain and monitor is estimated at $22,000 which is available within the Transportation Services Operating budget.
As the well-being of school aged children is a safety priority, it is recommended that this Motion be deemed urgent and that the General Manager, Transportation Services place a priority on the installation and operation of this pilot project.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.38) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.38
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72967.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73251.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.39 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 297 College Street to TCHC for Capital Improvements to the TCHC Building at 34 Oxford Avenue - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bail?o |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
1. City Council approve an increase in the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $600,827 gross, $0 net basis, fully funded by Section 37 funds received in the development at 297 College Street (source account XR3026-3700587) for transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for capital improvements to the TCHC-owned building at 34 Oxford Avenue.
2. City Council direct that $600,827 from the Section 37 be forwarded to TCHC upon the signing of an Undertaking by TCHC governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. |
| Summary |
This Motion recommends the release of Section 37 Planning Act funds to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for the purpose of funding capital improvements at 34 Oxford Avenue, a property owned by TCHC.
The tenants of the apartment building at 34 Oxford Avenue have identified the need for capital improvements to the building.
The distribution of these funds by TCHC will be determined in part through a tenant engagement process that will identify and prioritize improvements to their homes and communities, as well as consultation with the local Councillor. TCHC has agreed that these funds, which are sourced as community benefits from Ward 20 developments, will not be used for capital improvements for projects that are already included on TCHC's list of Ward 20 capital projects.
The development at 297 College Street secured Section 37 benefits that included funding for capital improvements to TCHC projects in Ward 20 in the amount of $600,000. A total of $600,827 ($600,000 plus indexing) has been received by the City for this project.
TCHC will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.39) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.39
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72997.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73250.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.40 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 and Section 45 (Planning Act) Funds from Various Developments for Capital Improvements to Ward 20 Toronto Community Housing Corporation Properties - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bail?o |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Approved Operating Budget of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $864,792.01 gross, $0 net, for transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for capital improvements including capital maintenance to the TCHC properties in Ward 20, fully funded by Section 37 and Section 45 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits in the following developments:
a. 12, 18 Mercer Street and 60 John Street, secured for affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $86,810 (source account XR3026-3700504);
b. 56 Blue Jays Way, secured for affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $486 (source account XR3026-3700423);
c. 181, 199, 203 Richmond Street West and 10 Nelson Street, secured for affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $104,794 (source account XR3026-3700515);
d. 192A, 194, and 200 Bloor Street West, secured for TCHC capital improvements to affordable housing within Ward 20, in the amount of $106,456 (source account XR3026-3700513);
e. 117 Peter Street and 287 Richmond Street West, secured for capital improvements to the TCHC properties in Ward 20, in the amount of $123,507 (source account XR3026-3700503);
f. 103-111 Bathurst Street, secured for capital improvements to affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $62,711 (source account XR3026-3700542);
g. 134 Peter Street and 364-370 Richmond Street West, secured for capital improvements to social housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $41,929.00 (source account XR3028-4500133);
h. 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West, secured for capital improvements to public housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $10,000 (source account XR3028-4500147);
i. 426-444 Adelaide Street West, secured for capital improvements to social housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $60,000 (source account XR3028-4500141); and
j. 288A, 290 and 294 Adelaide Street West, secured for capital improvements to social housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $39,307 (source account XR3028-4500117)
k. 11 Charlotte Street, secured for capital improvements to social housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $101,812.08 (clearing account 220096);
l. 224 King Street West, secured for a range of benefits including capital improvements to public housing in Ward 20, of the total $1,000,0000 secured, a total in the amount of $126,979.93 (source account XR3026-3700469).
2. That the $864,792.01 be forwarded to TCHC, subject to TCHC signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. |
| Summary |
Funds have been secured in various developments in Ward 20 as community benefits for affordable housing and capital improvements to affordable, social, and public housing, through Sections 37 and 45 of the Planning Act.
The funds will be used by Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for capital improvements, including capital maintenance, with respect to various Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) properties in Ward 20. The distribution of these funds by Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) will be determined through a tenant engagement process, which will identify and prioritize improvements to their homes and communities, and in consultation with the local Ward Councillor. Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) has agreed that these funds sourced as community benefits from Ward 20 developments will not be used for capital improvements that would have been included on Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC)'s list of Ward 20 capital projects.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.40) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.40
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73002.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.41 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| A Request to allow Toronto Community Housing Corporation to renovate the Regent Park Artificial Ice Rink (with donations from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment) - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to enter into an agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation with donations from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation to renovate the City-owned Regent Park Artificial Ice Rink on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor. |
| Summary |
As part of the ongoing redevelopment of Regent Park, Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) with a donation of $2.0 million from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MSLE) are developing the Regent Park Athletic Grounds. This is a multi-use sports park which will be turned over to the City as part of the parkland contribution requirements for the third phase of the subdivision agreement when completed.
These lands which are currently in ownership of TCHC also include the South Regent Park outdoor artificial ice rink and building. The building and rink are owned by the City of Toronto constructed under agreement on TCHC owned lands in 1982.
This Motion seeks Council approval to allow TCHC to renovate the City-owned building and ice pad as part of the overall $3.7 million dollar Regent Park Athletic Grounds build out. The facility when completed this fall, will host a training session for Team Canada at the World Junior World Championship being held here in Toronto December 2014 - January 2015.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation will abide by the City of Toronto's procurement and fair wage policies for work on the City owned building.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.41) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.41
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72964.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73249.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.42 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Request for Attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 45 Cardigan Road (A65/14EYK) - by Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor James Maloney, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variances for 45 Cardigan Road. |
| Summary |
An application for minor variances/permission (File A65/14EYK) was made by the property owner to construct a new detached dwelling with a secondary suite at 45 Cardigan Road.
The requested variances to the Committee of Adjustment were: the new dwelling will have a floor space index of 0.55 times the lot area (320.1 m2) where the By-law requires a maximum permitted floor space index of 0.45 times the lot area (261.3 m2); the new dwelling will have a height of 10.34 m whereas the By-law requires a maximum permitted dwelling height of 9.5 m; a secondary suite is proposed with the new dwelling where the By-law for a secondary suite is a permitted use provided that the entire building was constructed more than five years prior to the introduction of a secondary suite. The Committee of Adjustment decision on June 26, 2014 authorized these variances.
The staff report that was sent to the Committee of Adjustment requesting variances for floor space index and dwelling height are not in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood or the intent of the Zoning By-law. City Planning staff recommended the application be refused.
There were a significant number of residents that voiced their opposition to the Committee of Adjustment decision; subsequently the decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by a resident.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.42) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.42
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72966.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 45 Cardigan Road (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72989.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.43 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Request for Appeal of and Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 86 Twenty Third Street - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decisions to refuse the consent and minor variances (B4475/13EYK, A314/13EYK and A315/13EYK) for 86 Twenty Third Street, and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary. |
| Summary |
The owners of the land municipally known as 86 Twenty Third Street applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent (Application B47/13EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A314/13EYK and A315/13EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings.
On July 24, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.
There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed lot frontages and areas are out of keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood. Massing and setbacks are also issues of concern to neighbourhood residents.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.43) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.43
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72971.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notices of Decision on consent and minor variances for 86 Twenty Third Street (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72972.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73248.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.44 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Declaring November 29, 2014 "Shop the Neighbourhood Day" - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council declare November 29, 2014 “Shop The Neighbourhood Day” to celebrate Toronto’s neighbourhood and small business retailers and to promote Toronto’s Business Improvement Areas across the City. |
| Summary |
"Shop the Neighbourhood" is an annual initiative to promote local shopping in support of small businesses. Sandwiched between Black Friday and Cyber Monday on one of the busiest shopping weekends of the year, the event serves as a reminder to residents that their dollars have greater impact in their communities when spent locally. In 2012, an estimated $5 billion was lost by Canadian retailers to their U.S. competitors over the holiday season.
Inaugurated in 2013 in Toronto, this year it will be going national to celebrate the importance of local retailers and neighbourhoods. Toronto's small businesses employ close to 50 percent of Canada's workforce and drive close to 30 percent of Canada's GDP. Shopping local creates jobs, contributes to vibrant neighbourhoods and keeps dollars close to home. Last year, over 1,800 local businesses across 58 Business Improvement Areas in Toronto offered over 2,000 promotions and deals in conjunction with the event and generated significant media attention about the importance of local retailers in the City. Post-event research showed that 25 percent of residents in Toronto were aware of the event and of those, 84 percent made a local purchase during Shop the Neighbourhood.
On November 29, 2014 Canadians nationwide will be encouraged to shop locally and take advantage of exclusive event day deals as part of "Shop the Neighbourhood". The City of Toronto's recognition of this initiative will help to promote the City's small businesses, Toronto's Business Improvement Area communities, and local neighbourhoods across the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.44) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.44
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72973.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.45 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds for Improvements to McCormick Park - by Councillor Ana Bail?o, seconded by Councillor McMahon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the Association of Community Centre's approved 2014 Operating Budget for the Scadding Court Community Centre by $33,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 funds obtained in the development at 311 Brock Avenue for the purchase of two shipping containers to be used for the Shipping Container Café project to be located at McCormick Park.
2. City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $15,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 funds obtained in the development at 311 Brock Avenue for the electrical and plumbing costs associated with the Shipping Container Café project to be located at McCormick Park. |
| Summary |
The intent of this Motion is to transfer a total of $48,000 toward the McCormick Park Shipping Container Café, inclusive of $33,000.00 to the Scadding Court Community Centre for the purchase of two shipping containers, and $15,000 to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division for electrical and plumbing work which the containers require. Section 42 funds in the amount of $48,000 have been secured and received in the development at 311 Brock Avenue.
It is intended that the Container Café be run by Aangen Community Centre, a registered not for profit corporation. Aangen Community Centre and the Business Services Unit of Parks, Forestry, and Recreation are in the process of finalizing a license agreement which will allow them to operate the Café on behalf of Parks Forestry and Recreation.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.45) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.45
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72978.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73247.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.46 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Ensuring developments comply with the Ontario Building Code and provide a view to the outdoors from bedrooms - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner, in consultation with the Chief Building Official, to review all design guidelines affecting the built form of development to ensure that they are consistent with the objective of Article 3.7.2.1 of the Ontario Building Code "to provide a view to the outdoors from bedrooms" and to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on their findings in the first half of 2015. |
| Summary |
Every month, City Council approves zoning amendment applications for thousands of new housing units in buildings. These new buildings will soon be the homes for thousands of new residents and their families and we want to make sure they will have a high quality of life in their new homes.
When evaluating development applications Councillors are often not aware of the final configuration of the units that will be occupied by the new building's residents. The internal arrangement of the units themselves are often not considered at the planning stage, they are only considered at the building permit stage, after the building envelope, number of units, and floor plates have been approved.
The Ontario Building Code Article 3.7.2.1 sets out a requirement that bedrooms must have a view to the outdoors. The City of Toronto Building division has policies that can permit windowless bedrooms so long it can be demonstrated that the bedrooms will still have a view to the outdoors. The quality of this compulsory view to the outdoors is being pushed to the limits with applications that include bedrooms in the rear of very deep and narrow residential units.
Council needs to ensure the intent of Article 3.7.2.1 of the Building Code is being upheld. More importantly, Council must ensure new units are comfortable and livable for the new residents.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.46) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.46
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72976.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.47 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:41 |
| Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 3300 McNicoll Avenue - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board and has been deemed urgent. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the appeal with respect to the Committee of Adjustment decision to approve the minor variance application (A090/14SC) for 3300 McNicoll Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to retain an independent land use planner, if necessary. |
| Summary |
The owner of the condominium unit municipally known as 3300 McNicoll Avenue A211 applied to the Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel to obtain a minor variance from the provisions of the Zoning By-law to continue using units 211 and 213 for educational and training purposes (Kumon Math and Reading Program) without a time limit. These uses are not included in the list of permitted uses under the Industrial District Commercial (MDC) designation in the Zoning By-law. The applicant received approval for the above use in 2006 for a period of two years, in 2008 for a period of five years and in 2013 for a period of two years. The 2013 approval was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) by the condominium board and subsequently the OMB reduced the approved time period to one year.
Owens Corning Canada is located nearby at 3450 McNicoll Avenue in the Tapscott Marshalling Yards Employment District. Owens Corning manufacturers thermal and acoustical insulation and employs 150 - 200 staff. As Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE) has identified Kumon as a sensitive land use, Owens Corning may be required to include measures to mitigate the impacts of any new process equipment it intends to use when applying for a MoE Certificate of Compliance or for an amendment to current certificates. These mitigation measures can be costly and may inhibit or preclude Owens Corning Canada’s ability to expand and/or introduce new product lines at this location. It has opposed the minor variance referenced above.
At its meeting on July 10, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment approved the application to permit educational and training uses at 3300 McNicoll Avenue without a time limit. Owens Corning has appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision.
As noted in the report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, (PG26.6, Planning for a Strong and Diverse Economy: Official Plan/Municipal Comprehensive Reviews - Proposed Economic Health Policies and Proposed Policies and Designations for Employment Lands, http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.PG26.6 )
“Toronto's Employment Areas are places where new businesses can locate and grow and existing businesses can expand in a stable operating environment without having their operations impacted by the introduction of sensitive uses. They are home to almost a third of the jobs and 90 per cent of the industry in Toronto and have low vacancy rates and an enviable amount of new investment. Toronto's Employment Areas are important contributors to the tax base and home to 40 per cent of our export-oriented jobs that provide important economic multipliers felt throughout the local economy. Toronto's Employment Areas are finite and geographically bounded. The policies for Employment Areas emphasize their preservation for current and future business activities."
The Provincial Growth Plan also contains detailed policies to allow municipalities to preserve and grow employment and, among other things, requires municipalities to plan for, protect and preserve 'employment areas' for current and future uses; defining employment areas as areas designated in the official plan for business activities including but not limited to manufacturing, warehousing, offices and associated retail.
It is recommended that the City seek party status in order to appear at the hearing of the appeal by Owens Corning of the Committee of Adjustment decision in regard to 3300 McNicoll Avenue (A090/14SC).
This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on this matter may be scheduled before the next meeting of City Council.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.47) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.47
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72974.pdf) Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel - Public Hearing Notice and Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 3300 McNicoll Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72975.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73246.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.48 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Request for Report on ways and means of preventing children and youth under the age of majority from buying energy drinks - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Board of Health. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Communications MM55.48.1 to MM55.48.3 have been submitted on this Item |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Medical Officer of Health, in consultation with other appropriate staff, to report to the Board of Health on ways and means of preventing children and youth under the age of majority from buying energy drinks, and on the feasibility of:
a. banning energy drink marketing, distribution (sampling) and advertising on City properties;
b. banning the sale of energy drinks to youth and children in all Toronto affiliated agencies, boards, and commissions including the Canadian National Exhibition in compliance with the ban at City properties;
c. banning the sale of energy drinks to youth and children in Toronto retail outlets; and
d. requiring point-of-sale warning signage to be posted in retail outlets to assist in awareness to the potential dangers that these drinks pose. |
| Summary |
City Council, through the Board of Health, has already recognized the dangers to children and youth from energy drinks and has banned the sale of these drinks at all City properties. Energy drinks such as Red Bull, Monster, Rock Star etc. are now required by Health Canada to state “Not recommended for children, pregnant/breastfeeding woman and individuals sensitive to caffeine” and “Do not mix with alcohol”. The Toronto District School Board has sent out warnings to parents after it was made aware that a beverage company has been approaching its students to become sales representatives for their energy drink products. The State of Maryland has legislated a prohibition to stop anyone from selling or distributing energy drinks to minors.
In order to strengthen these regulations and to educate the public of the dangers, City Council needs to take the next step of banning energy drinks to children and youth under 19.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.48) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.48
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72977.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Don Cha, General Manager, Ontario Korean Businessman's Association (MM.New.MM55.48.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49608.pdf) (August 25, 2014) Letter from Michelle Saunders, Vice President, Provincial & Territorial Affairs, Food & Consumer Products of Canada (MM.New.MM55.48.2) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49616.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Letter from Karl Littler, Vice President, Provincial Government Relations and Strategic Issues, Retail Council of Canada (MM.New.MM55.48.3) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49617.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.49 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Proposed Improvements to Bill Johnston Park and Liberty Village Park in Liberty Village - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Acting General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to work in consultation with the local Councillor toward the construction of a unique, enclosed dog off-leash area in Bill Johnston Park, and on general improvements to Liberty Village Park. |
| Summary |
Liberty Village is a unique neighbourhood in one of the densest areas of Toronto. The need to ensure that our green spaces function to meet the needs of our residents is magnified when there is limited space to share and enjoy.
Since 2012, Councillor Layton's office has been working closely with local residents to determine their priorities for parks via community meetings and public surveys. The support for an enclosed dogs off-leash area (DOLA) in Bill Johnston Park, and playground and aesthetic improvements in Liberty Village Park is overwhelming.
While the proposed enclosed DOLA does not meet the People, Dogs and Parks - Off-Leash Policy, it is important to note that many of the concerns listed in this policy are negated by the unique character of the neighbourhood this DOLA would be located within. With respect to its appearance, there is a comparable private DOLA facility on Joe Shuster Way in Ward 14.
Liberty Village Park has become a hub for social activity in Liberty Village, hosting Arts festivals, movie nights and other community initiated events. Improving the park and onsite playground to meet the demands on the space is of the utmost importance to local residents.
Funding for the hiring of a consultant to design these two plans was approved by City Council during the 2014 Operating and Capital Budget discussions.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.49) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.49
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72991.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73245.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.50 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Enhancing Accessibility on Sidewalks in the City of Toronto - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the Director, Equity, Diversity and Human Rights and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review current standards as they relate to sidewalk cross-slopes and to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on whether current standards should be amended to reduce the maximum allowable cross-slope on sidewalks constructed in the City of Toronto to enhance accessibility for all. |
| Summary |
In August 2009, Toronto City Council adopted a Statement of Commitment to Creating an Accessible City which states "The City of Toronto is committed to building an inclusive society and providing an accessible environment in which all individuals have access to the City’s services and programs in a way that respects the dignity and independence of people with disabilities." The statement goes on to read "the City of Toronto will continue to prevent barriers by designing inclusively and supporting positive attitudes that address "ableism" - attitudes which devalue and limit the potential of persons with disabilities." A key component of ensuring accessibility is ensuring the built form of our City is created in such a way that it can be used by all, regardless of age or physical abilities. In this respect, there is currently room for improvement with the City's sidewalks.
Sidewalks are purposely constructed with a slant in certain sections; for example, at curb ramps or where sidewalks meet driveway aprons. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) requires that the cross-slope (i.e. the slope of a surface that is perpendicular to the direction of travel) of a sidewalk not exceed 1:20, or 5 percent. The City of Toronto's Accessibility Design Guidelines do not address the cross-slope of a sidewalk, however, the City's construction standards require that a sidewalk cross-slope fall within the range of 2 percent to 4 percent. While a preliminary review of regulations across the Provinces revealed that many are comparable to those of Ontario and specifically, the City of Toronto, our neighbours to the south, through the Americans with Disabilities Act, set the maximum cross-slope at 2 percent.
Sloped sidewalks make it difficult for those with walkers, canes, wheelchairs or other mobility assistive devices to traverse these sections while maintaining balance. Even a child on a tricycle would have difficulty crossing certain sections of sidewalk due to the extent of the slant. While cross-slopes are necessary, consideration should be given to whether we should change our standards by reducing the maximum cross-slope permitted for sidewalks within the City, resulting in more passable sidewalks for all.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.50) |
| Background Information |
| Revised Member Motion MM55.50
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72992.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.51 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Guild Inn - Revitalization and Development of Restaurant and Banquet Centre Facilities - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor David Shiner |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Bill 959 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (August 20, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Acting General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation:
1. City Council authorize the City to enter into the Sublease which shall include those terms and conditions set out in Schedule A and in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 of this Report following execution of Sublease with GIE.
3. City Council authorize that the by-law enacted pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, previously authorized to provide authority to enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with GIE in respect of a portion of 205 Guildwood Parkway (the "Eligible Property"), include an exemption of the Eligible Property from development charges. |
| Summary |
By adopting Item GM28.10, as amended, on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014, City Council approved the proposed plans and principle terms and conditions of a long-term sublease agreement with Guild Inn Estate Inc. The purpose of this Motion is to include additional terms and provisions to the sublease respecting the Guild Inn Estate Inc. proposal.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.51) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.51
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72993.pdf) (August 20, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72996.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.52 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 450 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 100 Fort York Boulevard / 511 Bremner Boulevard, for construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council direct that $611,708.79 funded from Section 37 community benefits secured in the development at 450 Lake Shore Boulevard West and adjacent lands, Blocks 9/10 ($111,708.79 from source account XR3026-3700280) and at 100 Fort York Boulevard, Railway Lands West, Blocks 33 and 37 (511 Bremner Boulevard) ($500,000.00 from source account XR3028-3700553) be released and directed towards the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for the purposes of construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre. |
| Summary | ||||||
The Ward Councillor's office is working with Councillor Layton and Economic Development and Culture staff on the revitalization of Fort York as a legacy project of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 commemoration. The Fort York Visitor Centre is the largest component of the overall work and has been identified as a key project to serve the Fort York Neighbourhood by enhancing access to, and interpretation of, the Fort and providing much needed community space and programming.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $111,708.79 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 450 Lake Shore Boulevard West and adjacent lands (Blocks 9/10) for improvements to Fort York, including the construction of the Fort York Visitors Centre. Section 37 funds in the amount of $1,662,263.63 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 100 Fort York Boulevard/511 Bremner Boulevard (Blocks 33 and 37) for a series of community benefits, including towards the construction costs of the Fort York Visitors Centre.
The total project budget for the Fort York Visitor Centre is $25,213,000, including $3,700,000 from Section 37 and Section 45 contributions. These Section 37 and Section 45 funds have been included within the $3,700,000 figure but have not yet been specifically identified within the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture.
The intent of this Motion is to transfer a total of $611,708.79 of Section 37 funds ($111,708.79 from 450 Lake Shore Boulevard West, and $500,000 from 100 Fort York Boulevard/511 Bremner Boulevard) to the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for the purposes of constructing the Fort York Visitor Centre.
*figures within this table represents $1000's.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.52 ) | ||||||
| Background Information |
| Revised Member Motion MM55.52
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72984.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.53 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Call for a National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council call on the Prime Minister to call a national inquiry into the tragic and inequitable issue of missing and murdered aboriginal women in order to provide justice for the victims, put an end to the violence, and provide answers to the systemic failures of the justice system. |
| Summary |
For more than a year, people across Canada have been trying to bring attention to the shocking issue of the hundreds of missing and murdered aboriginal women. The evident failure of the RCMP to investigate hundreds of cases of missing aboriginal women, as well as widespread and documented reports of use of excessive force and sexual and physical abuse of aboriginal women by RCMP officers while in custody and the failure of the Federal government to take seriously the issue has lead to widespread calls from aboriginal leaders, civil society, human rights groups, and the public for a national inquiry into the cases. A national inquiry is the only way to start to serve justice for the missing women and their families. It is incumbent upon Toronto City Council to join the call for a national inquiry.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.53) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.53
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73005.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.54 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Authorization to Release Section 45 Funds from 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West to Eva's Phoenix (Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth) for Capital Improvements to the 505 Richmond Street West Facility - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bail?o |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division on a one-time basis by $90,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 funds received in the development at 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West (source account XR3028-4500148) for transfer to Eva’s Phoenix (Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth) for capital improvements to its building located at 505 Richmond Street West.
2. City Council direct that the $90,000 be forwarded to Eva’s Phoenix upon the signing of an Undertaking by Eva’s Phoenix governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. |
| Summary |
This Motion recommends the release of Section 45 funds to Eva’s Phoenix (Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth) for the purpose of funding capital improvements at its new facility located at 505 Richmond Street West.
The development at 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West secured Section 45 benefits that included funding for capital improvements to Eva’s Phoenix in the amount of $90,000. These funds have been received by the City.
Working with business, labour and community partners, Eva’s Phoenix provides homeless and at-risk youth with the opportunities needed to develop life skills, build careers and live independently. Eva’s Phoenix provides housing for 50 youth, aged 16 to 24 years, for up to a full year. As well, since 2002, Eva's has provided support to approximately 160 youth per year between the age of 16 to 29, who participate in employment and pre-apprenticeship programs managed by the Eva's Phoenix. The proposed funding will be utilized for capital improvements at a new facility located at 505 Richmond Street West.
Eva’s Phoenix will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.54) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.54
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73003.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73244.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.55 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19, 20 |
| Commemorating the History of Immigrant Communities in the Bloor and Bathurst Neighbourhood - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director, Public Realm, Transportation Services and the Director, Museum and Heritage Services, Economic Development and Culture, to begin a process to commemorate the immigrant communities along Bathurst Street, from Dupont Street to Lake Ontario, and that this be undertaken in consultation with appropriate City Divisions, community members, the local Business Improvement Areas and residents associations, and the local Ward Councillors. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to give authority to City Staff to begin a process to commemorate the history of the immigrant communities who have settled and worked in the Bathurst and Bloor neighbourhood, and to improve the public realm by way of these commemorative installations.
The recently approved Bathurst Street Study recommends improving the Public Realm along the entire length of Bathurst Street between Queen Street West and Dupont Street. Commemorative installations support these recommendations and would be a unique opportunity to create a Public Realm that reflects the community's history and vision for the area. Funding for public realm improvements is available from nearby developments.
In 1870, the stretch of road north of Queen Street, formally known as Crookshanks Lane, was renamed for Henry Bathurst, 3rd Earl Bathurst and British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, who organized migration from the British Isles to Canada after the War of 1812. Since then, Bathurst Street has been a gathering place for new immigrants to Canada. Bathurst Street became a cultural hub, home to the first Caribbean grocery store, as well as record stores that carried the first reggae and R&B records, barber shops and beauty parlors, Golden Boy and Lloyd’s. Bathurst was the home of Beverley Mascoll, a pioneering business woman and community activist, and where publisher Dan Gooding, Jr. and Editor J. Ashton Braithwaite launched Spear: Canada’s Truth and Soul Magazine in Toronto in 1971.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.55) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.55
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73004.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.56 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Release of Section 37 Funds, 21 Avenue Road, for Streetscape Improvements to Yorkville Avenue between Bay Street and Avenue Road in the Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council amend the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture to create a new capital project named "Bloor-Yorkville Streetscape Improvements" with a total project cost of $600,000 in 2014, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 21 Avenue Road (source account: XR3026-3700594) for the purpose of the streetscape improvements to Yorkville Avenue between Bay Street and Avenue Road in the Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area. |
| Summary |
The City has a long standing partnership with the Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (BIA). In 2014, the City will be replacing water mains and resurfacing Yorkville Avenue from Bay Street to Avenue Road.
In conjunction with the City's contact, the Bloor-Yorkville BIA will be installing road and sidewalk paving with rolled curbs to create a pedestrian-focused street and to create an urban plaza environment, especially during street events when Yorkville Avenue would be closed to traffic.
Funds have been secured and through a Section 37 agreement for the development at 21 Avenue Road in the amount of $600,000.00 plus accrued interest for streetscape improvements in the Village of Yorkville area.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.56) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.56
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73008.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73243.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.57 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Amendments to Heritage Toronto Operating Budget to Apply Section 45 Funds for Community Benefits Projects in Ward 27 - Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto by $5,500 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 community benefits from the Committee of Adjustment decision for 1 Bloor Street East (source account XR3028-4500124)) for the production and installation of and to contribute to a maintenance fund for a heritage plaque in the Yorkville community. |
| Summary |
Heritage Toronto is working with local advocates to commemorate the contributions of Walter Moos and Gallery Moos in the Historic Village of Yorkville and to the cultural development of Toronto. By introducing international artists to the city and mentoring Canadian artists, Walter Moos was a key catalyst in the transformation of Toronto into a vibrant cultural centre. As the first business to obtain commercial zoning on Yorkville Avenue, Gallery Moos was the pioneer in the development of the district. In June of 2013, Walter Moos passed away at the age of 86.
Walter Moos's first gallery was at the south-east corner of Avenue Road and Davenport, but in 1962 he applied for commercial rezoning of 136-138 Yorkville Avenue and, after much effort, succeeded in establishing one of the first businesses on Yorkville Avenue, which at the time, was a residential street and his move opened the door for all that Yorkville subsequently became and is today: from counter-culture centre to art gallery district and (now) luxury goods neighborhood.
This Motion seeks authorization to amend the 2014 Operating Budget of Heritage Toronto to apply $5,500, funded through an agreement made under Section 45 of the Planning Act, to fund the Walter Moos and Gallery Moos plaque project in the Historic Village of Yorkville.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.57) |
| Background Information |
| Revised Member Motion MM55.57
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73006.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73242.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.58 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Release of Section 45 Funds for Local Streetscape and Lighting Improvements in McGill and Granby Parkettes - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $700,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 funds obtained in the development at 19-21 Dundas Square and 252-258 Victoria Street, (source account: XR3028-4500119), for the purpose of streetscape and lighting improvements in McGill and Granby Parkettes. |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto has a long standing partnership with the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (DYBIA). The Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area is proposing to install lighting upgrades, improved paving markers and curbs, and new planting and tree pits in the vicinity of the McGill and Granby Parkettes.
The revitalized public spaces will help create a more inviting, vibrant and dynamic streetscape for the community to enjoy and will allow for more active programming of the parkettes by the local business community and the DYBIA.
Funds have been secured and received as a condition of approval of a minor variance (Section 45) application for the development at 19-21 Dundas Square and 252-258 Victoria Street, (Committee of Adjustment file A0283/11TEY) in the amount of $941,450.00 plus accrued interest for streetscape or other improvements to Yonge Street.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.58) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.58
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73010.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73241.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.59 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 and Section 45 (Planning Act) Funds from Various Developments for Capital Improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation Properties - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Approved Operating Budget of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $700,103.00 gross, $0 net, for transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for capital improvements including capital maintenance to various TCHC properties in Ward 27, fully funded by Section 37 and Section 45 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits from the following developments:
a. 984, 990, 1000 Bay Street, secured for capital improvements to TCHC buildings, in the amount of $400,000 (source account XR3026-3700611);
b. 145-185 Davenport Road, secured for capital improvements to affordable housing in Ward 27, in the amount of $100,000 (source account XR3026-3700580);
c. 21 Avenue Road, secured for capital improvements to affordable housing in Ward 27, in the amount of $170,000 (source account XR3026-3700592);
d. 608-618 Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street, 15-25 St. Nicholas Street, secured for capital improvements to TCHC buildings in Ward 27, in the amount of $103.00 (source account XR3028-4500107); and
e. 1 Bloor Street East, secured for capital improvements to TCHC buildings in Ward 27, in the amount of $30,000 (source account XR3028-4500124).
2. City Council direct that $700,103.00 be forwarded to TCHC, subject to TCHC signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. |
| Summary |
Funds have been secured in various developments in Ward 27 as community benefits for affordable housing and capital improvements to affordable, social, and public housing, through Sections 37 and 45 of the Planning Act.
These funds will be used by Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) for capital improvements, including improvements to common areas and enhancements to increase resident's safety and security. The allocations of the requested funds have been determined in part through a tenant engagement process that identified and prioritized improvements for TCHC buildings in Ward 27. Funding distribution will also be determined in consultation with the local Ward Councillor. TCHC has agreed that these funds sourced as community benefits from Ward 27 developments will not be used for capital improvements that would already have otherwise been included on TCHC's list of Ward 27 capital projects.
TCHC will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.59) |
| Background Information |
| Revised Member Motion MM55.59
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73007.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73240.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.60 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| Bay-Bloor Pedestrian Priority Phase intersection - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to:
a. complete the updated review of the Bay/Bloor pedestrian priority phase intersection;
b. give consideration to recommendations arising out of the community consultation as to possible modifications to the signal operations including time-of-day operations; and
c. report back to the first 2015 meeting of Toronto East York Community Council on the findings of the review and provide recommendations for changes, if necessary, to the signal operations. |
| Summary |
The Bay/Bloor pedestrian priority phase or 'scramble' signal operation has been in operation since 2010. In 2013, staff presented preliminary results of a review of the signal operations at a community meeting. The community was evenly divided in its support of the scramble operation and also made suggestions about potential modifications such as selected time-of-day use. Based on feedback received in the meeting, staff committed to updating the traffic studies following the completion of road reconstruction work on Bay Street. Construction on Bay Street has now been completed and, as a result, staff will be completing the updated traffic studies in early September when volumes normalize. A final report to Toronto East York Community Council on this matter will address community issues, data collection and analysis, proposed modifications and implementation.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.60) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.60
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73011.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.61 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Beautify Oriole Parkway - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Transportation Services Capital Budget by $315,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to 111 St. Clair Avenue West (source account: 220096) to provide one-time funding of $315,000.00 to beautify the Oriole Parkway median between Eglinton Avenue and Imperial Street and to beautify the eastern boulevard of Oriole Parkway between Kilbarry Road and Lonsdale Road. |
| Summary |
Section 37 funds have been secured and received in the development at 111 St. Clair Avenue West for streetscape improvements. This Motion directs developers' fees toward improving the Oriole Parkway median and other streetscape improvements.
At present, the Oriole Parkway median is a drab concrete strip separating the north and southbound lanes that is more inviting for cars to illegally park on than it is for grass and trees.
This Motion directs $315,000 installation of planters for approximately 60 trees, new curbs, top soil and sod on the median between Eglinton Avenue and Imperial Street. In addition, the funds will be used to beautify the eastern boulevard of Oriole Parkway between Kilbarry Road and Lonsdale Road.
These improvements will create a more beautiful public realm on Oriole Parkway for the neighbourhood to enjoy, while also alerting drivers that they should control their speed in this residential area.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.61) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.61
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73009.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73239.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.62 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Congestion Management Plan - by Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back as part of the 2015 budget process on the financial implications of including an additional 500 traffic signal re-timing reviews, in addition to the current plan for 1,000, to be completed over the next three years to alleviate congestion. |
| Summary |
The City of Toronto is making significant progress on our new congestion management plan. An important part of this plan is implementing traffic signal coordination at 1,000 key intersections across Toronto.
Fighting traffic congestion is a top priority for the City of Toronto. Traffic negatively impacts the quality of life in our City and costs the Toronto area over $6 billion annually in lost productivity. Congestion creates unreliable travel times and delays for commuters, businesses and transit users and increases fuel consumption and makes it more expensive to own a car.
As part of our congestion management plan, the City of Toronto has invested to implement traffic signal coordination at 1,000 intersections. This Motion seeks a report on increasing the scope of this project to include an additional 500 intersections.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.62) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.62
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73012.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.63 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for New Trees and other Public Realm Improvements in the Yonge Street and St. Clair Avenue West Area - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Transportation Services Capital Budget by gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to 111 St. Clair Avenue West (source account: 220096) to provide one-time funding of $200,000.00 for new trees in City standard planters and other public realm improvements in the Yonge Street and St. Clair Avenue West area. |
| Summary |
Section 37 funds have been secured and received in the development at 111 St. Clair Avenue West for streetscape improvements. This Motion directs developers' fees toward improving the public realm in the Yonge Street and St. Clair Avenue West area.
The public realm in the Yonge Street and St. Clair Avenue West area is in great need of improvement. The sidewalks are cracked and the very few trees present are in poor health, sitting in out-of-date planters that are used as a receptacle for cigarette butts and garbage.
This Motion directs $200,000 for planting trees in new, City-standard planters and custom work to improve the streetscape.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.63) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.63
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73013.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73238.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.64 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Accountability of Major Capital Projects to provide Accurate Capital Budget Estimates - by Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:
1. Notwithstanding the implementation of enhancements recommended by the Auditor General's Office to enhance the reporting of the City's major capital projects, as well as a new capital budget estimates process recently implemented for major Facilities Management capital projects, City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to City Council, through the Budget Committee and Executive Committee, in the first quarter of 2015 on:
a. options to increase accountability around capital projects and to ensure that City staff present more accurate capital budget estimates for these projects;
b. options to ensure City staff adhere to the capital project budgets set by City Council; and
c. how this will contribute to more accountable, transparent, and accurate capital budgeting. |
| Summary |
For years we have watched costs on large City-run capital construction projects escalate to millions of dollars over what they were originally estimated at. We have worked hard to dramatically reduce cost overruns on such projects during this term of office. Today, the City of Toronto has a new team of senior bureaucrats managing these complex projects to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget.
It is essential that capital projects are budgeted accurately from the offset. The key is greater scrutiny to hold staff accountable to the budgets they present to City Council. This Motion seeks a report on options to ensure the City is paying closer attention to providing more accurate estimates of capital costs for projects from the offset.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.64) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.64
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73015.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.65 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| By-law Enforcement Staffing Levels in City Parks - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to the Licensing and Standards Committee at its first meeting in 2015 on the appropriate level of by-law enforcement needed for the City of Toronto's Park System. |
| Summary |
With more than 1,600 public parks across the City covering 13 percent of the City's land area (a total of over 8000 hectares) Toronto has come to be known as The City Within a Park. This system of parks and the 600 kilometres of trails that wind through them are an integral and defining part of our City and provide free and accessible spaces for socializing and recreation, promoting healthy, active living and fostering community. Toronto's public parks play host to special events and programming year round and are used by members of our communities from all walks of life, of all ages and abilities; they are an invaluable and necessary asset for the diverse communities across this City. Our parks provide significant economic benefits as well in their roles as cultural and creative spaces, by acting as a strong pull for tourists and through the promotion of healthy and sustainable communities.
Such an extensive and actively used park system requires extensive and active upkeep and stewardship to ensure that they remain safe and welcoming environments for residents and visitors alike. Yet the City Within a Park has only eight (8) Park By-Law Enforcement Officers on staff to monitor and investigate reported by-law and maintenance issues and infractions throughout the over 8,000 hectares of parkland. Due to this severe understaffing, pro-active management of park by-laws is not possible and issues are handled on a complaints basis only.
Our parks will only become more economically and socially valuable as our City continues to increase in density steadily every year and it is critical that we build the capacity to properly manage a sustainable and vibrant network of public parks.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.65) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.65
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73014.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.66 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:27 |
| 42 Charles Street East and 39 Hayden Street - Proposed Technical Amendment to Zoning By-law Section 37 Provisions - by Councillor Kristyn Wong Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. Bill 1040 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:
1. City Council amend By-law 7-2013 (OMB), as it relates to the community benefits contribution under section 37 of the Planning Act, to provide that, instead of submitting a cash contribution with respect to streetscape improvements prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit, the owner shall provide this component of the community benefits in the following manner:
a. prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit, the owner shall submit a letter of credit in the amount of $250,000, which is equal to the value of the architectural design work associated with the subject streetscape improvements. The letter of credit shall be released, following satisfactory completion of the architectural design for the subject streetscape improvements;
b. the owner shall complete the architectural design of the streetscape improvements for both Charles and Hayden Streets from Yonge Street to Church Street to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and
c. prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit, the owner shall submit a cash contribution in the form of a certified cheque in the amount of $3,550,000 for the purpose of the streetscape improvements on both Charles and Hayden Streets from Yonge Street to Church Street in accordance with the architectural design prepared by the Owner
2. City Council authorize staff to amend the agreement under section 37 of the Planning Act, dated August 31, 2012, to reflect the above revision; and
3. City Council determine that the revision proposed to the zoning by-law is minor in nature and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of this proposed zoning by-law. |
| Summary |
Ontario Municipal Board By-law 7-2013 was approved by the Municipal Board with the consent of the City. The approval will result in a 56-storey residential tower containing 474 residential condominium units on a 3-storey podium. Section 37 community benefits reflected in the zoning by-law and Section 37 agreement consist of $200,000 for local park improvements and $3,800,000 for streetscape improvements to both Charles Street East and Hayden Street from Yonge Street to Church Street. (These funds will not be spent to improve the streetscape in front of the site, since this is addressed as a condition of site plan approval).
The City and the development applicant always contemplated that the streetscape improvements required as a community benefit would be designed by the applicant's architect, architectsAlliance, however, the zoning by-law and resulting Section 37 agreement inadvertently require that the funds associated with the design work be provided to the City as a cash contribution rather than a letter of credit. The City and the applicant have agreed that the cost of the design work will be capped at $250,000.
The purpose of this amending by-law is to clarify that the applicant shall provide a letter of credit for the design of the streetscape improvements prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit, with release of the letter of credit upon satisfactory completion of the design work. A cash contribution will still be provided for the City to complete the streetscape improvements as designed.
This Motion is submitted on an urgent basis. The applicant has been working with the City towards the design of the streetscape improvements and will soon seek its above-grade building permit in order to move forward with the development proposal.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.66) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.66
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73017.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.67 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Commemorating physician George Robert Grasett - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council approve the renaming of the public space at the south-east corner of Adelaide Street West and Widmer Street "George Robert Grasett Park" in honour of physician George Robert Grasett.
2. City Council direct the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to give effect to the naming of "George Robert Grasett Park."
3. City Council endorse in principle a partnership with the Ireland Park Foundation to create an appropriate memorial to George Robert Grasett and those who died from typhus at the former Emigrant Hospital located on the same block as the park. |
| Summary |
The City has secured, as part of the re-development of 21 Widmer Street, a piece of public property on the south-east corner of Widmer Street and Adelaide Street West, a part of the same block that was occupied by the Emigrant Hospital in 1847. The previous and current local councillors have been in discussions with the Ireland Park Foundation about creating an appropriate memorial on this site to Dr. Grasett and those who died at the Emigrant Hospital. Through another nearby re-development, $600,000 in parkland dedication funding has already been earmarked in the Parks Capital Budget.
In the 1840s, the failure of the potato crop forced one million Irish to emigrate and it is estimated that another 800,000 died from starvation. In 1847 alone, 38,560 refugees arrived in Toronto, a number greater than the population of the City at the time. Many Irish refugees were sick and dying from "ships fever" or typhus as we know it today.
Despite the prevailing anti-Catholic bigotry in Toronto at the time, physician George Robert Grasett worked tirelessly as the chief medical officer at the Emigrant Hospital, located at John Street and King Street West, along with a staff of orderlies and nurses, to care for the overwhelming numbers of people with typhus. Dr. Grasett died from the infection himself on July 16, 1847. Like the Irish victims of the disease, many of the orderlies, nurses, and doctors who succumbed to typhus are unknown to history. Dr. Grasett's personal sacrifice is a symbol representing much more than his individual deeds.
This Motion recommends the public space be named "George Robert Grasett Park" and that City Council approve, in principle, working with the Ireland Park Foundation to commemorate Dr. Grasett and those who died at the Emigrant Hospital.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.67) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.67
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73016.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.68 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Improving demolition control policies to strengthen heritage protection - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:
1. City Council request that the findings and recommendations of the two-year pilot program to create a new communications protocol be reported back in the first quarter of 2015 by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on the process for issuing demolition permits to strengthen the protection of properties that are not officially identified in the City's heritage inventory.
2. City Council request the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in collaboration with the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, to develop a public notification process to inform the local Councillor and local community when demolition permits are issued.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to report back to City Council in the first quarter of 2015 with recommendations for implementing a process to review demolition applications that does not vary according to zoning and housing type. |
| Summary |
Properties which have been identified as having historical significance to Toronto cover all land use designations. Many of these properties are designated or listed under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act but many are not as a result of the magnitude of compiling this inventory. At the same time, the process for demolishing properties in Toronto varies according to zoning. This reveals a gap between the process for identifying a property as having heritage value and the procedures that are in place to protect it from demolition.
Under Section 33 of the Ontario Planning Act, only demolition applications received for residential properties are subject to approval by City Council. As a result, the process for scrutinizing these applications is more comprehensive than their non-residential counterparts. Demolition applications submitted for non-residential properties are subject only to approval by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building. The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building is required to issue a demolition permit unless the demolition convenes any applicable law or policy.
Given that the heritage value of a property is not determined on the basis of its zoning, this leaves many properties throughout the City without a comprehensive review process in place if an application for demolition is submitted. This gap in municipal and provincial policies and legislation was recently demonstrated in the process leading to the demolition of the building at 81 Wellesley Street East.
On November 2, 2011, Toronto and East York Community Council requested that the property at 81 Wellesley Street East, the Odette House, be studied by the City Planning Division for the potential of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. About one month later, a demolition permit was issued to the property owner of 81 Wellesley by the Toronto Building Division. Due to the property's commercial zoning and its unlisted and undesignated heritage status, the application was not reviewed outside of the Toronto Building. A demolition permit was then issued by the City without notification from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to the local Ward Councilor or City Planning staff. On January 18, 2012, the Odette House was demolished.
A meeting of City Planning, Heritage Preservation and Toronto Building staff was convened shortly afterwards by Councillor Wong-Tam to review the legislation that permits demolitions. As a result of that meeting, City staff undertook a two-year pilot program to create a new communication protocol between the related divisions including the Ward Councillor to prevent demolition permits from being issued for properties under consideration and review for Heritage listing or designation.
The process leading to the demolition of this building, which had been recently identified by City Council as having potential historical importance, speaks to a gap in municipal policies and legislation that requires review and resolution. The current provincial and municipal legal framework leaves all non-residential properties and certain exempted properties, including rooming houses, exposed to potential demolition without comprehensive review of their heritage value to the City.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.68) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.68
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73018.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.69 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Increasing Affordable Housing in Alexandra Park - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bail?o |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director of the Affordable Housing Office to report to the Affordable Housing Committee at its first meeting in 2015 on directing designated Section 37 funding to the creation of new affordable rental housing in Alexandra Park. |
| Summary |
The purpose of this Motion is to request staff to report on using Section 37 funds for new affordable rental housing in Alexandra Park within the Atkinson Housing Co-operative.
A revitalization project at Alexandra Park is currently underway and there is an opportunity to increase the number of affordable housing units within the community.
Funds have been secured through Sections 37 and 45 benefits in various developments in Ward 20 to assist in the provision of affordable housing. These are: 523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West, secured for capital improvements to and/or the acquisition of Affordable Housing in Ward 20 in the amount of $500,000.00 (source account XR3026-3700617); 100 Fort York Blvd., Railway Lands West, Blocks 33 & 37 (511 Bremner Blvd.), secured for capital improvement to public and/or affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $185,902.54 (source account XR3026-3700492); and 120 Bremner Boulevard, secured for affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $212,106.95 (source account XR3028-4500111).
This Motion is urgent because it relates to an approved revitalization project that is already underway. (Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.69) |
| Background Information |
| Revised Member Motion MM55.69
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73019.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.70 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Demarcating Public from Private Property - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the first quarter of 2015 on a recommended process and corresponding implementation guidelines to create visual aids demarcating the City of Toronto property line on major commercial thoroughfares. |
| Summary |
City of Toronto roadways, sidewalks, boulevards, also known as roads or street allowance are maintained under the purview of Transportation Services. This property is also referred to as "City property."
When the term City property is used, it often refers to the City's road allowance or the Public Right-of-Way. On the majority of City streets, the property line between public and private land ownership is not physically marked and therefore invisible to the human eye, especially incidents when the buildings are set back from the property lot line. As such, some confusion over the ownership, responsibility, enforcement and maintenance of these lands can arise.
New York City had worked with private property owners to create visual aids, such as elegant bronze plates or visually discreet, thin bronze and granite bands to demarcate the boundary separating private and public property. Similar visual markers have been used in the City of Toronto, but are not common. These types of markers can be installed in various Toronto locations of prominence to assist the general public, property owners, Municipal Licensing and Standards by-law enforcement, the Toronto Police Service, and other City staff to comprehend true placement of property lines and to ensure accurate enforcement and obligations of by-laws and other applicable legislative frameworks.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.70) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.70
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73021.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.71 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Excessive motorcycle noise - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to City Council through the Licensing and Standards Committee at its first meeting of the new term on options for improving regulations, management, and enforcement of excessive motorcycle noise; such report to include consultation with interested City Councillors and Provincial officials where appropriate.
3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to take effective steps to ensure that the Highway Traffic Act, Section 195 is protecting citizens from harmful noise. |
| Summary |
Recent media reports and residents suggest that motorcycle noise is burdensome and excessive in many of Canada's neighbourhoods, including Toronto.
The Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591, Noise, prohibits in Section 3, Paragraph C, specific types of noise: "The operation of a vehicle, engine, motor, construction equipment or pneumatic device without an effective exhaust, intake-muffling device or other sound attenuation device." Further, the provincial Ontario Highway Traffic Act, Section 75, requires every motor vehicle, including motorcycles, to have a muffler in good working order and in constant operation to prevent excessive noise, however, currently no provisions exist within the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591, to enable the City to effectively manage or enforce constituent complaints related to excessive motorcycle noise.
The lack of a municipal management and enforcement capability impacts people who cannot enjoy their homes peacefully because of excessive motorcycle noise from motorcycles that are either idling or are in motion. Residents are left without a municipal body to appropriately report to. More importantly, residents do not have a municipal body to enforce concerns regarding motorcycle noise, despite Chapter 591 of the Municipal Code.
This situation has been observed for many years, without any apparent improvement.
The lack of a management and enforcement mechanism to control excessive motorcycle noise complaints through municipal by-laws must be addressed. Although the control of vehicles is the jurisdiction of the Provincial government, the regulation, investigation and enforcement of prohibited noise is the jurisdiction of the City.
Unlike Toronto, other municipal jurisdictions, such as Calgary and Saskatoon, regulate excessive motorcycle noise. It is in the interest of responsible motorists and the peaceful enjoyment of homes that management and enforcement mechanisms for the City are needed.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.71) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.71
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73020.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.72 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Community Notification Regarding Disposal of City Land - Deferral of Implementation - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Member Motion MM52.17. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande, recommends that:
1. City Council defer implementation of the community notification process adoped in Item MM52.17 and direct the Chief Corporate Officer to report in the first quarter of 2015 on implications and recommendations regarding MM52.17. |
| Summary |
Member Motion MM52.17 headed "Community Notification with Respect to the Declaration of City Land as Surplus and the Disposal of the Land" was adopted by Council at its meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014 (the "Directive"). It provides (among other things) that the process by which City land is declared surplus and sold be amended to: (i) require community notification in the form of signage on a property at least 60 days before commencing the process of declaring City land surplus; and (ii) require such signage to include a notation that local residents may seek to purchase the land if declared surplus and offered for sale.
In developing an implementation plan for the Directive, staff have identified that effecting the Directive in its current form may adversely impact land requirements for strategic City initiatives such as various Metrolinx projects (including the Union-Pearson Airport link and the 2015 PanAm Games), Rouge National Urban Park, and Waterfront Toronto.
In addition, the wording as adopted impacts leases over 21 years, land exchanges and development proposals that may be beneficial to the City and frequently supported by the local Councillor, small parcels of land appropriate for sale to specific parties (often the adjoining owner), and disposals intended to support City objectives. The Directive's component requiring local residents to be advised that they may seek to purchase land in these types of transactions may lead to the mistaken belief by residents that they might be successful in purchasing the land.
Staff require an opportunity to analyze the impact and identify outcomes which result from this Directive and bring forward recommendations that will take into account strategic City initiatives and the integrity of the disposal process while addressing concerns regarding public notification.
Requires Re-opening: Member Motion MM52.17 – adopted by City Council June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.72) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.72
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72925.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.73 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| Include 588 Annette Street in Permit Parking Area 1E - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EY29.36. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council amend Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "1E" that includes 588 Annette Street, as attached in Appendix "A" to this Motion. |
| Summary |
588 Annette Street is a new condominium in Ward 13. In every case, a new condominium development adds cars to the surrounding streets, and in an attempt to support neighbouring residents who are already experiencing street parking pressure, I requested that 588 Annette Street be excluded from permit parking area 1E.
In the last several weeks, owners in this new condominium development have contacted me and explained the hardships they are experiencing as a result of 588 Annette Street being excluded from permit parking area 1E. After speaking with City Transportation staff, I have discovered that the permit parking numbers on the surrounding streets are stable and have been about the same number for the last five years, and there is enough room for the six residents in need of on street parking permits. It is for these reasons that I am moving that 588 Annette Street be included in the permit parking area of 1E.
Requires re-opening: Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY29.36 – adopted by City Council on December 16, 17 and 18, 2013.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.73) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.73
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72942.pdf) 588 Annette Street - Map of Permit Parking Area 1E (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72943.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73237.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.74 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:5 |
| Enacting a "No Right Turn on Red" Prohibition Westbound on Bloor Street West at The Kingsway - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * Notice of this Motion has been given. * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EY31.22. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise. Bill 933 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. City Council enact a westbound "No Right Turn on Red" prohibition at Bloor Street West and The Kingsway.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills to give effect to Part 1 above. |
| Summary |
As part of the intersection redesign, a request has been received from area residents to prohibit "right turns on red" from westbound on Bloor Street West onto The Kingsway. Their concern is for safety as this resident (number 1 The Kingsway) is exiting their driveway onto The Kingsway immediately north of the signalized intersection.
Currently, right turns are not allowed on a red signal based on the intersection design. However, with the approved intersection reconfiguration, these turns would become possible. This regulation is to maintain the existing condition of right turns not being allowed on a red signal and to provide improved egress from the residential driveways north of the intersection.
Requires Re-opening: Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY31.22 - adopted by City Council March 20, 2014, only as it pertains to traffic regulations.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.74) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.74
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72963.pdf) |
| Notice of Motion |
| MM55.75 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:39 |
| McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study - Removal of Matter from Committee - Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor John Parker |
| City Council has removed Item PG35.23 from the jurisdiction of the Planning and Growth Management Committee and brought the item forward for Council's consideration. The Toronto Transit Commission has submitted a letter on this Item (MM55.75a) Communications MM55.75.1 to MM55.75.18 have been submitted on this Item. See Item PG35.23 |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:
1. City Council approve the McNicoll Bus Garage Draft Environmental Project Report and authorize submission of the Environmental Project Report (EPR) to the Ministry of Environment. |
| Summary |
The Planning and Growth Management Committee, at its meeting held on August 7, 2014, deferred consideration of Item PG35.23 headed "McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study" until the next Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting in January 2015.
This Motion seeks to remove Item PG35.23 from the Planning and Growth Management Committee and bring it forward to City Council for consideration at the August 25 and 26, 2014 meeting.
The deferral of the Item will result in delay in having the McNicholl bus garage constructed and operating until the second quarter of 2020 instead of 2019. Other implications resulting from the delay are:
1. project escalation costs of $7 million per year (4 percent); 2. temporary facility will be required during the delay period; and 3. total leasing/retrofit for a temporary facility will cost approximately $6 million per year on the low end.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.75) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.75
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-72962.pdf) (August 22, 2014) Letter from Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission on McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study Removal of Matter from Committee (MM55.75a) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73082.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Revised Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73236.pdf) |
| Communications |
| (August 22, 2014) Letter from Christopher J. Williams, Aird and Berlis LLP (MM.New.MM55.75.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-49570.pdf) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Agnes Luk (MM.New.MM55.75.2) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Olivia Koo (MM.New.MM55.75.3) (August 23, 2014) E-mail from Karen Fung - With attached petition signed by approximately 185 persons. (MM.New.MM55.75.4) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Alice Leung, Property Manager, Brookfield Residential Services on behalf of MTCC1278 - Villa Elegance - With attached petition signed by approximately 105 persons. (MM.New.MM55.75.5) (August 22, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair (MM.New.MM55.75.6) (August 24, 2014) E-mail from May Wong (MM.New.MM55.75.7) (August 4, 2014) E-mail from May Wong, President, Villa Elegance, Board of Directors (MM.New.MM55.75.8) (August 5, 2014) Letter from John Verdone, The Brighton Convention & Event Centre (MM.New.MM55.75.9) (August 24, 2014) Letter from Lisa Chan (MM.New.MM55.75.10) (August 24, 2014) Submission from Coalition Against McNicoll Bus Garage (MM.New.MM55.75.11) (August 24, 2014) Submission from Kenneth Plummer, Vice President, Bamburgh Manor Residence (MM.New.MM55.75.12) (August 5, 2014) Letter from John Verdone, The Brighton Convention & Event Centre (MM.New.MM55.75.13) (August 25, 2014) Submission from Vincent Ching, Chair, Board of Directors, Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church (MM.New.MM55.75.14) (August 26, 2014) Letter from Jim Karygiannis (MM.New.MM55.75.15) (August 25, 2014) E-mail from Vincent Ching, Chair, Board of Directors, Scarborough Chinese Baptist Church (MM.New.MM55.75.16) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Sanson Yee (MM.New.MM55.75.17) (August 26, 2014) E-mail from Sanson Yee (MM.New.MM55.75.18) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.76 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Strengthening Public Service Governance - a Public Service By-law for Toronto: Technical Amendment - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice. * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EX42.3. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise. * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. |
| Recommendations |
Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:
1. City Council amend Item EX42.3 by revising Appendix F headed "Revised Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection Provisions" to the supplementary report (June 6, 2014) from the City Manager, as follows:
a. by replacing Bullet 3 in Section 3 "Responsibilities of the Auditor General", with the following new Bullet 3:
• May provide oversight to investigations led by the City Manager or designate; and
b. by replacing the first sentence of the second paragraph in Section 9, headed "Investigations" with the following two new sentences:
"The Auditor General's Office may provide oversight of alleged wrongdoing investigations led by the City Manager or his or her designate. The responsibility to ensure such investigations are appropriately conducted remains with the City Manager, as set out in Section 4, Responsibilities of the City Manager." |
| Summary |
At its meeting on June 10 to 13, 2014, City Council adopted as amended, Executive Committee Item EX42.3 headed "Strengthening Public Service Governance – a Public Service By-law for Toronto". The Executive Committee had recommended a number of amendments to the report appendices, including technical amendments to Appendix F, headed "Revised Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection Provisions", as requested by the Auditor General.
The City Manager submitted a supplementary report directly to City Council to reflect the Executive Committee's amendments. This supplementary report was adopted by City Council. It has since come to light that this supplementary report inadvertently did not include the technical amendments to Appendix F recommended by the Executive Committee.
REQUIRES RE-OPENING
Executive Committee Item EX42.3: Strengthening Public Service Governance – a Public Service By-law for Toronto adopted by City Council at its meeting on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014, only as it pertains to Appendix F.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.76) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.76
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73053.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.77 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:20 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plans - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for City Planning by $225,649.70 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 12, 18 Mercer Street and 60 John Street ($51,453.04 from source account XR3026-3700299), at 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street ($91,889.10 from source account XR3026-3700439) and at 181, 199, 203 Richmond Street West and 10 Nelson Street ($82,307.56 from source account XR3026-3700516) for the purposes of two Heritage Conservation District Plans required to complete the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Study. |
| Summary |
King-Spadina was identified by City staff in 2012 as one of five areas that warranted study for a potential Heritage Conservation District (HCD). It was selected primarily because of the high level of development activity and the fragility of some of the heritage resources. The HCD Study confirms that the unique history and evolution of the area, combined with the existing heritage fabric, qualifies the King-Spadina area for designation under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as an HCD, and has determined that the area should proceed to the Plan phase. The Study recommends that two separate HCD Plans be created for the King-Spadina HCD study area, a Commercial District HCD and an Entertainment District HCD.
Heritage Preservation Services (HPS) staff established a Roster of Qualified Heritage Consultants, and issued a Request For Quotation (RFQ) Work Assignment for the two Heritage Conservation District Plans. The cost and related expenses for the two plans are estimated at $225,649.70.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $51,453.04 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 12, 18 Mercer Street and 60 John Street for HCD Studies in the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $91,889.10 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 295 Adelaide Street West and 100-104 John Street for HCD Studies in the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $943,147.18 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 181,199 and 203 Richmond Street West and 10 Nelson Street for HCD Studies in the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area.
The intent of this Motion is to authorize the release of Section 37 funds in the amount of $225,649.70 to City Planning for the purposes of funding the preparation of the two HCD Plans as a component of the King-Spadina HCD Study.
This Motion is presented without notice because the bid deadline for the HCD Plan RFQ occurred after the City Clerk's deadline, and the final estimated cost and related expenses were not yet known at that time. This is an urgent matter because, due to the municipal election, this council meeting is the last opportunity for release of Section 37 funds for this project in 2014. If this motion is not considered at the current council meeting, start-up for this project will be delayed until early 2015. (Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 25, 2014 as MM55.77) |
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.77
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73051.pdf) (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73235.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.78 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:19 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 24 Bathurst Street (Block 6 North and Block 6 South) and 38 Grand Magazine for construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Layton, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council direct that $290,690.53 funded from Section 37 community benefits secured in the developments at 24 Bathurst Street, Block 6 North (formerly part of 20,22, 22A, 24 Bathurst Street) ($67,780.76 from source account XR3026-3700419); 24 Bathurst Street, Block 6 South (formerly part of 20, 22, 22A, 24 Bathurst Street) ($115,124.29 from source account XR3028-3700478); and 38 Grand Magazine, Block 3 (formerly part of 20, 22, 22A, 24 Bathurst Street) ($107,785.48 from source account XR3028-3700479) be released and directed towards the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for the purposes of construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre. |
| Summary | ||||||||||||||||
The Fort York Foundation, the Friends of Fort York, and Economic Development and Culture staff have been working with the Ward Councillor's office on the revitalization of Fort York as a legacy project commemorating the Bicentennial of the War of 1812. The Fort York Visitor Centre is the largest component of the overall work and has been identified as a key project to serve the Fort York Neighbourhood by enhancing access to, and interpretation of, the Fort and providing much needed community space and programming. The Fort York Visitor Centre will be officially opened to the public on September 19, 2014.
Section 37 funds totaling $290,690.53 including accrued interest have been secured and received from the following developments for the purposes of improvements to Fort York, including construction of the Fort York Visitors Centre:
The intent of this Motion is to transfer $290,690.53 of Section 37 funds from these developments to the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for the purposes of constructing the Fort York Visitor Centre.
The total project budget for the Fort York Visitor Centre is $25,213,000, including $3,700,000 from Section 37 and Section 45 contributions. These Section 37 and Section 45 funds have been included within the $3,700,000 figure but have not yet been specifically identified within the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture.
*figures within this table represents $1000's.
(Submitted to City Council on August 25 and 26, 2014 as MM55.78. | ||||||||||||||||
| Background Information |
| Member Motion MM55.78
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73052.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.79 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Review of Insurance Rates in Ontario - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to review the setting of property insurance premiums in Ontario, similar to its review of auto insurance premiums, and consider legislation to establish limits to premium increases in the Province.
2. City Council request the Province of Ontario to review the unfair practice of considering place of residence as a factor in assessing premiums. |
| Summary |
Last year many Canadians were first hand witnesses to large scale storm events that resulted in disasters across the country, including flooding in Toronto and Southern Alberta, and a major ice storm that impacted the Toronto Region. In 2013, the Insurance Bureau of Canada estimates these disasters resulted in $3.2 billion in property damage related claims, roughly twice the next highest year on record. In the wake of these disasters, insurance companies have seemingly been looking to recoup their costs for loss coverage. In the first quarter of 2014, personal property insurance premiums in Canada are up 7.5 percent compared to the same period last year. Many Toronto homeowners have raised concerns with the substantial increases to their property insurance premiums and/or changes to their insurance policies upon renewal.
The City of Toronto is doing its part to mitigate the possible risks associated with water damage through flood protection and prevention measures. These include subsidies to homeowners to install flood prevention devices, a by-law to mandate redirection of downspout discharge out of storm sewers, sewer infrastructure upgrades, and major infrastructure-intensive flood plain protection measures.
The City of Toronto has joined with partner municipalities to call on the provincial and federal governments to assist with the costs of damages caused by the July 2013 flood and the December 2013 ice storm and for investment in infrastructure upgrades to further protect against water damage and other catastrophes. The Province has responded to this request with compensation related to damages related to the ice storm and has recently initiated an evaluation of the Ontario Disaster Relief Assistance Program (ODRAP).
The Government of Ontario, with approval of its 2014-15 Budget, is moving ahead with legislative changes that will require the reduction of auto insurance premiums in Ontario by 15 percent over two years.
While this proposal will result in welcome consumer protection, many of my constituents have informed me of the inconsistent assignment of auto premium rates for comparable policies for safe drivers across Scarborough. Depending on the will and resources of their owners, personal vehicles can travel anywhere around the City, the GTA or beyond. As such, they can theoretically be at risk of a collision anywhere within driving distance. It seems unfair for insurance companies to charge different premiums to drivers based on their residence. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.80 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:40 |
| 2187 Victoria Park Avenue - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision for A147/14SC - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Deputy Mayor Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:
1. Should the Committee of Adjustment decision or 2187 Victoria Park Avenue be appealed by the applicant, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to support the Committee's decisions. |
| Summary |
Committee of Adjustment at its meeting held on August 7, 2014 approved a minor variance to convert the ground floor of the existing single detached dwelling at 2187 Victoria Park Avenue into a veterinary clinic.
Committee approved the application on condition:
1. This approval shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from the date this decision becomes final and binding. (This time period would allow opportunity for the owner to seek approval by way of a zoning by-law amendment application.)
2. The proposed use is restricted to a maximum area of 98 square metres on the ground/main floor only. |
| Background Information |
| Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission - 2187 Victoria Park Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73118.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.81 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:15 |
| Request for Report on Water Servicing and Sewer Upgrades in an area bounded by Hillmount Avenue to the north, Marlee Avenue to the east, Stayner Avenue to the south, and Times Road and Capital Avenue to the west - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor John Filion |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on water servicing infrastructure for an area in Ward 15 bounded by Hillmount Avenue to the north, Marlee Avenue to the east, Stayner Avenue to the south, and Times Road and Capital Avenue to the west, with information on the current status of water servicing infrastructure in the general area, and a schedule for improvements. |
| Summary |
On behalf of area residents and in order to address chronic basement flooding in the area bounded by Hillmount Avenue to the north, Marlee Avenue to the east, Stayner Avenue to the south, and Times Road and Capital Avenue to the west, I am requesting that staff conduct an assessment of the water servicing and sewer system and subsequently establish a schedule for improvements.
The sewer system in this area is over 60 years old and was designed to the standards and living conditions of that time. With development growth in the area and increased frequency of extreme weather events, pressure on existing sewer and drainage systems has increased.
This area has already been recognized as part of Area 17 of the Basement and Surface Flooding Study being conducted by Toronto Water and in need of additional analysis and priority for improvements. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.82 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Appointment of Director and Deputy Chief Building Official - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. Bill 1026 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz, recommends that:
1. City Council appoint William Martin Johnston as Deputy Chief Building Official for the City of Toronto, with all the powers and duties of the Chief Building Official within the district of the City of Toronto assigned by the Chief Building Official.
2. City Council authorize and direct appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to this Motion including the introduction in Council of any necessary bills. |
| Summary |
A competition was held to fill the vacancy of Director and Deputy Chief Building Official and William Martin Johnston was selected to fill this vacancy, effective October 7, 2013.
Subsection 3(2) of the Building Code Act, 1992, requires the council of each municipality to appoint a chief building official and under section 77 of the Legislation Act, 2006 the power to appoint a person to a public office includes the power to appoint a deputy with the same powers as the holder of the office subject to specified conditions, or with limited powers as specified.
Certain actions under the Building Code Act, such as the issuance of Emergency orders, can only be undertaken by either the Chief Building Official or a Deputy appointed by Council. At the present time only two of the four current Directors are appointed as Deputies. In order to provide adequate coverage across the City of Toronto, it is important that the appointment of a third Deputy Chief Building Official proceed as soon as possible. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.83 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Partial Development Charges Exemption - Municipal Social Facility Space to be Provided at 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the area of the "Social Facility Space" in the amount of 545 square metres, as proposed in the development proposal at 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street (referenced as Planning Applications nos. 10 164793 NNY 23 OZ and 12 116291 NNY 23 OZ) from the payment of Development Charges at the time of building permit issuance for the development proposal.
2. City Council direct that the Section 37 Agreement in relation to the development proposal shall require the owner to secure the development charge otherwise payable until such time as the Social Facility Space is conveyed to the City. |
| Summary |
In its decision on July 16, 2013, Council adopted NY25.42 and approved a proposal to develop a 35-storey mixed-use commercial and residential building with 374 residential units and 5,575 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. One of the required community benefits involves conveying to the City 545 square metres of "Social Facility Space", fronting on a publicly accessible open space mews area. The Social Facility Space will be provided to the City on a turn-key basis, finished to the level required in NY25.42 as set out in the Section 37 Agreement.
The Section 37 Agreement is now executed and the bills are before this Council at this meeting. Those involved in finalizing those materials now realize that the owner will have to pay development charges for the area of the Social Facility Space – even though the Social Facility Space will be conveyed to the City, free of charge, at a later stage in the construction process.
This Motion seeks to exempt the owner from development charges with respect to the area of the Social Facility Space on the basis that this portion of the development proposal is being constructed so that it can be provided at no cost to the City.
The value of the improvements to the Social Facility Space will not be credited in favour of the owner and other areas of the development proposal will remain subject to development charges.
This matter is considered urgent on the basis that the owner, having worked with City staff since July 16, 2013, on this very large development proposal, now has significant financial, legal and contractual deadlines to move forward with the project before the next Council meeting.
Link to Item NY25.42: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.NY25.42
|
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.84 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:13 |
| Release of Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu for 1844 Bloor Street West - second phase of construction on the Sunnyside Bike Skills Park - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget by $50,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by a Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu (CIL) for 1844 Bloor Street West, source account XR2213-4200471, for the second phase of construction on the Sunnyside Bike Skills Park. |
| Summary |
Authority is being sought to amend the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget by $50,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by a Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu (CIL) for 1844 Bloor Street West, source account XR2213-4200471, for the second phase of construction on the Sunnyside Bike Skills Park. |
| Background Information |
| (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73265.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.85 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:16 |
| Mady Development - Relief from Compensation for loss of On-Street Parking - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:
1. Given that the removal of three (3) on-street meter locations within the City block 1678- 1704 Avenue Road has been proposed as a result of community input, City Council direct that the developer shall not be required to compensate the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) for the loss of three (3) on-street meter locations in accordance with TPA Policy Resolution 2-12, first adopted on December 18, 2012. |
| Summary |
There are currently seven (7) lay by meter parking spaces on the west side of Avenue Road between Brookdale Avenue on the south and Fairlawn Avenue on the north. There have been numerous community consultation meetings where at it was expressed by representatives of local businesses, and the public, that some on-street metered parking remain after the block has been redeveloped. Three (3) metered locations are proposed to be removed in order to provide a pedestrian friendly boulevard separation between the proposed building and the roadway curb line. The developer has agreed to make whatever changes to the streetscape that are required as a result of public input so that the streetscape reflects the wishes of the community. The resulting preferred public streetscape design requires the removal of three (3) on-street meter locations at no fault of the developer whom simply wants to achieve the public's vision for the Avenue Road streetscape. Therefore, the developer should not be penalized for the removal of on-street meter locations that are a result of the public's wishes to accommodate the preferred streetscape design. |
| Background Information |
| (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73266.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.86 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Review of Regulations Governing Home Improvement Contractors - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to review Chapter 545, Licensing and all regulations governing building renovators, contractors and trades, and report in the next term of Council on any by-law amendments necessary to address issues related to home improvement contractors.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to work with the Toronto Police Service to educate and promote awareness on home improvement contractors or companies.
3. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to ask the Chief of the Toronto Police Service to establish a task force responsible for investigating instances of fraud committed against senior citizens and to work with Municipal Licensing and Standards, where appropriate, to address issues that arise. |
| Summary |
There have been an increasing number of complaints regarding some home improvement contractors, including paving companies, taking advantage of senior citizens to conduct fraudulent and costly home repairs. Home improvement contractors may use several methods of targeting seniors, including high pressure phone calls, flyers, advertisements and door-to-door sales.
Fraudulent contractors can be effective in making people think their services are needed and then defrauding their victims. In one common scheme, a home improvement contractor is hired to conduct minor repairs at a reasonable price. The contactor soon reports that more serious problems exist, which the home owner is led to believe are in urgent need of repair. The home owner, feeling he or she has no choice but to make the urgent repairs, ends up with a bill for questionable and poor quality services which vastly exceed the initial estimate. According to some reports, bills for fraudulent repairs are in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Senior citizens are among the most vulnerable members of our society and are particularly susceptible to such schemes. For those living on fixed incomes, the costs for fraudulent repairs risk depleting their hard-earned life savings. The City of Toronto has the authority to implement regulations on businesses for the purpose of consumer protection, and as a society, we have a responsibility to ensure that our most vulnerable residents are protected. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.87 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Report on Catch Basin Locations and Retention - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor John Parker |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Water, in conjunction with the staff from Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the spring of 2015 on the possibility of creating a potential mapping system for catch basins, highlighting those at risk of being lost on private property, the rate at which these catch basins are being lost, and on a strategy for the mitigation of the loss of catch basins including an awareness program which includes a voluntary identification, fines for covering or blockage, and other ways and means to discourage the blockage of catch basins. |
| Summary |
An issue of increasing importance for the many neighbourhoods in the City is one of rainwater maintenance. By this I mean that as residents continue to build on their properties, such as: a new garage, tool shed, an addition to their home, and even a complete demolition and reconstruction of an entire house. It is clear that more and more catch basins are being covered up and forever lost to the system.
These catch basins were originally installed in the 1960's, especially in the former City of North York, in order to help contain rainwater overflow and ultimately prevent the flooding of neighbours' properties.
With the new issues facing us: the mandated downspout disconnection program, climate change resulting in increased rainfall within short time periods, redevelopment pressures of infill housing and the building of new communities, we find ourselves in the position in which we can be of very limited assistance to residents who experience flooding-related problems.
We are unable to locate any plans of subdivision which detail the location of the original catch basins. As a result it makes it very difficult to help affected victims of flooding in any meaningful way. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.88 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:3 |
| Release of Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu (CIL) for 2, 4, and 6 Eva Road for Upgrades and Park Improvements at Centennial Park - by Councillor Peter Leon, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Peter Leon, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget by $100,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by a Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash in Lieu (CIL) for 2, 4, and 6 Eva Road (source account XR2213-4200541) for upgrades and park improvements at Centennial Park. |
| Summary |
Authority is being sought to amend the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget by $100,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash in Lieu (CIL) for 2, 4, and 6 Eva Road, source account XR2213-4200541, for upgrades and park improvements at Centennial Park. |
| Background Information |
| (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73267.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.89 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:30 |
| Expression of Support for Receipt of Donation of a Memorial consisting of a bench and sculpture commemorating the life of Jeffrey Baldwin at Greenwood Park - by Councillor Paula Fletcher seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council accept the donation of a memorial consisting of a bench and sculpture to be placed in Greenwood Park commemorating the life of Jeffrey Baldwin, subject to meeting the criteria of the "Official Gift Donations" policy and pending the outcome of a community consultation process. |
| Summary |
This project was originally conceived as a way to recognize the life of Jeffrey Baldwin, a young boy who lived close to Greenwood Park and who passed away under tragic circumstances.
This public art feature, which is currently under construction, is scheduled for completion and installation prior to the end of the September, 2014. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.90 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:32 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 funds to Transportation Services' StART's Partnership Program for the Continuation of Mural Art on Woodbine Avenue - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Approved 2014 Operating Budget for Transportation Services, in the amount of $10,000 gross, $0 net, on a one-time basis, for the StART's Partnership Program, with funding provided by a Section 37 contribution associated with the approved developments at 763 -765 Woodbine Avenue and 1945 - 1955 Gerrard Street East in the amount of $10,000 (source: account number 220096) for the purpose of completing a mural on Woodbine Avenue. |
| Summary |
Transportation Services' StART's Partnership Program provides funding for projects which support the programs mission to revitalize and engage communities through street and mural art.
The funds are to be utilized to transform and beautify the underpass on Woodbine Avenue at Darrel Avenue, through the installation of a mural. This highly visible location has been a target of vandalism for over ten years. Despite repeated attempts to keep it clean, the wall continues to be tagged frequently. The theme of the mural is 'dynamic movement and togetherness' and will represent the underpass as an entranceway into the surrounding communities.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $60,000 plus accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 763 -765 Woodbine Avenue and 1945 - 1955 Gerrard Street East streetscape improvements. This Motion seeks the authorization to release $10,000 of the funds. The request is in conformity with the established policies for the use of section 37 Planning funds. |
| Background Information |
| (August 26, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73268.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.91 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Expropriation of 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place for the North York Centre Service Road - by Councillor Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Shiner |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. Bill 987 has been submitted on this Item. |
| Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Shiner, recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (August 22, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Transportation Services (CTP-800-8) by the amount indicated in Confidential Attachment 1 by transferring the amounts from the Section 37 Community Benefits Source Accounts identified in Confidential Attachment 1 for the acquisition or expropriation of lands identified in Appendix A (each such property a "Property" and collectively the "Properties").
2. City Council, grant authority for the City to enter into agreements, an offer to sell or a Section 30 Agreement under the Expropriations Act, with the owner of each of the Properties (and any such other related and required agreements) to acquire each Property from such owner for consideration within the ranges identified for each Property in Confidential Attachment 1, on terms and conditions acceptable to the CCO, together with such other terms as may be deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services, jointly and severally, to execute such agreements referred to in Recommendation No. 2.
4. In the event that the City is unable to reach an agreement with an owner of a Property for the acquisition of such Property by the City as provided for in Recommendation No. 2, City Council:
a. as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of such Properties;
b. as the expropriating authority under the Expropriation Act, authorize City staff to take all steps necessary to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of the Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election as to a Date for Compensation and/or Notices of Possession for such Properties, as may be appropriate;
c. authorize City staff to obtain an appraisal report to value the Properties, updated to the date of expropriation or, if the owner so elects in accordance with the Expropriation Act, to the date of service of the Notices of Expropriation; and to prepare and serve offers of compensation on all registered owners, at the appraised value, all in accordance with the requirements in the Expropriation Act; and
d. authorize the Director of Real Estate Services to sign the Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Possession and the Offer of Compensation on behalf of the City for such Properties.
5. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 once there has been a final determination of all property transactions and claims for compensation related to the Project to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
6. City Council grant leave for introduction of the necessary Bills in Council to give effect thereto.
7. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect hereto. |
| Summary |
City Council at its meeting of July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 adopted Item GM 31.24 which authorized staff to initiate the expropriation process for the taking of the properties known as 49 Sheppard Avenue East and 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 Bonnington Place for the North York Centre Service Road (the "Project").
The City has secured funds for land acquisition for the Project through density incentives for a number of projects in the North York Centre Secondary Plan Area.
This report recommends that City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Transportation Services by the amount indicated in Confidential Attachment 1 in the report (August 22, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services for the acquisition of lands identified in Appendix A to the report and that City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of these properties and/or enter into agreements for the acquisition of these properties in order to proceed with the development of the Project.
This matter is urgent as there are no further regular City Council meetings in 2014 and owners of some of the properties have submitted an application for development of their properties and intend to move forward with such development unless resolution can be reached for the acquisition of their properties by the City. |
| Background Information |
| (August 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services on Expropriation of 49 Sheppard avenue East, 4-24 Bonnington Place
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73088.pdf) Confidential Attachment 1 |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.92 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| City Manager and Deputy City Manager Cluster A Retirements and Transition Process - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor David Shiner |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (August 25, 2014) from the City Manager, entitled City Manager and Deputy City Manager Cluster A - Retirements and Transition Process:
1. Given the City Manager's announcement that he will be leaving the City effective November 28, 2014, City Council appoint John Livey in an acting capacity as the City Manager for the City of Toronto effective December 1, 2014; with all the powers and duties imposed upon the City Manager by Article I of Chapter 169, City Officials, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, and as chief administrative officer under Section 140 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;
2. Given the Deputy City Manager Brenda Patterson's announcement that she will be leaving the City effective November 6, 2014, City Council request the City Manager to ensure that an acting Deputy City Manager for Cluster A is in place effective November 7, 2014 and an acting Deputy City Manager for Cluster B is in place effective December 1, 2014; and
3. City Council authorize the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources to immediately begin the recruitment process for a City Manager and a Deputy City Manager, using an external recruitment firm. |
| Summary |
Joseph P. Pennachetti will be retiring as City Manager at the end of this term of Council. Brenda Patterson, Deputy City Manager, Cluster A will be retiring prior to the end of the term.
City Council must appoint an Acting City Manager and begin a recruitment process for a permanent City Manager and Deputy City Manager as soon as possible to ensure these positions can be filled on a timely basis given their importance to the organization.
The City Manager has submitted a report to Council to recommend the appointment of John Livey as Acting City Manager effective December 1, 2014 and requesting authority to begin the recruitment process. The City Manager will ensure that acting Deputy City Managers for Clusters A and B are in place as required to ensure ongoing leadership on an interim basis pending the results of the recruitment process. |
| Background Information |
| (August 25, 2014) Report from the City Manager
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73122.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.93 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Donation from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment/MLSE Foundation - by Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Mayor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:
1. City Council delegate authority to the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept donations totalling $2,000,000 from the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment and/or MLSE Foundation over a ten-year period in accordance with the Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefits.
2. City Council direct that the donated funds be spent to enhance sports facilities, basketball programming and reduce barriers to access with a priority to low income high risk neighbourhoods, including children and youth living in Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings including access for youth living in Toronto Community Housing Corporation.
3. City Council authorize the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to enter into agreements with the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment and/or MLSE Foundation to spend the donated funds on mutually identified refurbishment projects and programs on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor. |
| Summary |
As announced by the Chief Executive Officer of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment during his deputation on the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee, MLSE generously wishes to donate $2 million dollars over the next 10 years to enhance sports facilities, basketball programming and reducing barriers to access.
Donations to City of Toronto for Community benefits policy requires City Council approval to receive donations over $50,000 from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment. This Motion seeks City Council's authority for the Division to accept and spend the donation as outlined below.
This Motion is urgent as Council approval must be obtained before staff can accept the donation and City Council will not meet again until the new term. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.94 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| Commemorative Naming of Gazebo in St. James Park for Michael Comstock - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor John Filion |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the feasibility of naming the gazebo located in St. James Park in honour of Michael Comstock, in accordance with the City of Toronto's Honorific and Street Naming Policy. |
| Summary |
Michael Comstock was a driving force in the St. Lawrence Market neighbourhood. As one of the founding members and past Chair of the St. Lawrence Market BIA, as well as the past President of the Old Town Promotional Alliance, he was instrumental in the renaissance of the neighbourhood. His initiatives will have a lasting impact in the community, from the streetscape improvements that made the neighbourhood an attractive place to live and visit, to The Kitchen in the St. Lawrence Market, which enhanced the food experience in one of the world's leading markets.
Many of his projects originated from his deep passion for the history of the community and the origins of Toronto. Michael promoted numerous approaches to celebrate our heritage, including special branded street signs, identifying significant landmarks with interpretative plaques, lighting heritage buildings, and creating events to tell Toronto's story through music and theatre.
Michael was also a strong advocate for small businesses and an important leader in the BIA community. As an active member of his BIA, then as President of the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas (TABIA), he constantly worked to showcase Toronto's diverse neighbourhoods and promote local businesses.
A community initiative has proposed a commemorative naming of the gazebo in St. James Park, a site for musical and cultural events that Michael worked to bring forward.
This item is urgent due to the timing of the implementation of the revitalization of the gazebo in St. James Park beginning in early 2015 and the requirement to have a naming decided at that time. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.95 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:28 |
| 101 King Street East and 54 to 70 Colborne Street - Review of Ontario Municipal Board Decision - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to file a motion for leave to appeal to the Divisional Court from the Ontario Municipal Board decision of July 31, 2014 respecting 101 King Street East and 54 to 70 Colborne Street and to proceed with the appeal, if leave is granted by the court.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to file a motion with the Ontario Municipal Board to initiate a review of its decision of July 31, 2014 respecting 101 King Street East and 54 to 70 Colborne Street and to instruct staff to attend the review, if leave is granted by the Ontario Municipal Board.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to initiate a review of The St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area and report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 providing a recommended amendment to the Official Plan to establish a new Area Specific Official Plan Policy with respect to height and built form of new development, as well as community benefits under Section 37.
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to schedule a community consultation meeting for the proposed Official Plan Amendment with the Ward Councillor. |
| Summary |
At its meeting of July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014, City Council authorized the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the applicant’s appeals respecting the zoning by-law amendment and site plan applications for 101 King Street East and 54 to 70 Colborne Street
On July 31, 2014, the Ontario Municipal Board issued its decision to allow the appeal and approve a 25-story mixed use development.
The decision presents several issues for the City requiring review and reconsideration.
As well, a review by the Chief Planner and Executive Director of the existing St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Focused Area Urban Design Guidelines to bring forward a draft new Area Specific Official Plan Policy would help ensure that future development in the area respects the moderate heights anticipated in the Guidelines.
This item is urgent as it addresses a litigation matter and a legal deadline. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.96 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards playing field Improvements at Eglinton Junior Public School - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $250,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 87-107 Davisville Avenue and 108-128 Balliol Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700577) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the playing fields located at Eglinton Junior Public School, 223 Eglinton Avenue East.
2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
3. City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the playing fields at Eglinton Junior Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
4. City Council request the Director of Community Planning to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff. |
| Summary |
This Motion seeks to support improvements to the playing fields at Eglinton Junior Public School, located at 223 Eglinton Avenue East. The funds will go toward a number of new amenities contributing to a revitalized play area including:
• Funnel ball game
Section 37 funds in the amount of $250,000 have been secured and received in the development at 87-107 Davisville Avenue and 108-128 Balliol Street for local area park or streetscape projects or other community benefits within the local community. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $250,000 to the Toronto District School Board towards the cost of improvements to the playing fields at Eglinton Junior Public School.
A Community Access Agreement to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at the school. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Toronto District School Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.
This Motion is urgent as the funds need to be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board to meet their construction timelines. |
| Motion Without Notice |
| MM55.97 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Liquor Licence - 1104 College Street - Black Cat Espresso Bar - File No. 816916 - by Councillor Ana Bail?o, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Black Cat Espresso Bar, 1104 College Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Summary |
Black Cat Espresso Bar Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a premises at 1104 College Street, operating under the name Black Cat Espresso Bar (the “Premises”). The application is for a new liquor licence with an indoor capacity of 30 persons.
The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licenced establishments. There is concern in the community that this increase in capacity will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.
This motion is being submitted without notice for consideration at City Council due to the fact that notification of this liquor licence application was received late. |
| Motion Without Notice |
| MM55.98 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:18 |
| Liquor Licence - 303 Lansdowne Avenue - Lansdowne Brewery - by Councillor Ana Bail?o, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Lansdowne Brewery, 303 Lansdowne Avenue (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. |
| Summary |
Cardinal Brewing Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a premises at 303 Lansdowne Avenue, operating under the name Lansdowne Brewery (the “Premises”). The application is for a new liquor licence, with an indoor capacity of about 88 patrons.
The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licenced establishments. There is concern in the community that this increase in capacity will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.
This motion is being submitted without notice for consideration at City Council due to the fact that notification of this liquor licence application was received late. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.99 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:31 |
| 2915 St. Clair Avenue East - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision for A0030/14TEY - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:
1. In the event the Committee of Adjustment decision on 2915 St. Clair Avenue East is appealed by the applicant, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to support the Committee's decisions and retain outside consultants as may be required. |
| Summary |
Committee of Adjustment at its meeting held on August 20, 2014, considered an application to expand a service station by adding a retail store and installing two additional gas pumps on the west side of the property facing private residences. This lawful non-conforming gas station is located on a property designated "Neighbourhoods" in the Official Plan and zoned R1B Residential. The Committee of Adjustment denied the application and supported the resident's requests to maintain the gas station at its current size. The applicant has indicated an intention to appeal this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
This Motion is urgent as the hearing on this may take place before City Council meets in the new term. |
| Background Information |
| Comittee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of decision on minor variance for 2915 St. Clair Avenue East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-73094.pdf) |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.100 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| Urgent Action Required regarding Existing Liquor Licence at 1708 St. Clair Avenue West (Marinho Sport Bar) - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to request the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to schedule a hearing in order to impose strict conditions on the existing liquor licence for Marinho Sports Bar located at 1708 St. Clair Avenue West.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to impose strict conditions on the existing liquor license for Marinho Sports Bar located at 1708 St. Clair Avenue West. |
| Summary |
For the past few months, local residents have been kept awake during most weekdays, public holidays and long weekends, due to excessively loud music emanating from this establishment.
Marinho Sports Bar located at 1708 St. Clair Avenue West has operated outside the scope and boundaries of its licence, as it has been functioning similar to a nightclub with loud Karaoke music.
This bar has been the source of many complaints related to loud noise, public drunkenness, serving liquor and hosting after hour parties that spill into the streets with amplified sound until the early morning hours, and public safety concerns which have seriously detracted from the success and vitality of the local business strip.
This establishment is located next to residential properties and there is great concern that this location will continue to be very disruptive for residents in the area.
The continued operation of this business is no longer in the public interest, therefore, the liquor license and business operation must be subject to strict conditions. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.101 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:17 |
| To Revoke Existing Liquor Licence at 360 Old Weston Road (Tropical Desires) - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to request the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to schedule a hearing in order to revoke the existing liquor licence for Tropical Desires located at 360 Old Weston Road.
2. City Council requests the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to revoke the existing liquor license for Tropical Desires located at 360 Old Weston Road. |
| Summary |
For the past few months, local residents have been kept awake during most weekdays, public holidays and long weekends, due to excessively loud music emanating from this establishment.
Tropical Desires located at 360 Old Weston Road has been operating outside the scope and boundaries of its licence, and has been functioning similar to a nightclub rather than a bar.
This bar has been the source of many complaints related to loud noise, public drunkenness, serving liquor and hosting after hour parties in the back yard areas that spill into the street with amplified sound until the early morning hours, loitering and public safety concerns which have seriously detracted from the success and vitality of the local business strip.
This establishment is located next to residential properties and there is great concern that this location will continue to be very disruptive for residents in the area.
During the weekend of August 22, members of 12 Division’s Community Response Unit along with two Inspectors from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario's office conducted liquor license checks which resulted in charges being against this establishment.
The continued operation of this establishment is no longer in the public interest and must be revoked. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.102 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Review of Liquor Licences - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to issue a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the liquor licence for Westwood Burger – 1931 Weston Road, Cobra Sports Bar – 1776 Weston Road, Nancy's Sweet Plate – 1215 Weston Road and Red Room – 1718 Jane Street (the "Premises") on the grounds that the past and present conduct of the Licensees afford reasonable grounds that the businesses will not be operating in accordance with the law and the operation of these businesses is not in the public interest
2. City Council request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the licence for these Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario or the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion. |
| Summary |
In response to a request from City Council, the Toronto Police Service and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario carried out inspections of licenced establishments throughout 12 Division, resulting in charges laid for the following establishments:
• Westwood Burger – 1931 Weston Road • Cobra Sports Bar – 1776 Weston Road • Nancy's Sweet Plate – 1215 Weston Road • Red Room – 1718 Jane Street
As these locations have been the source of complaints from the community for some time, it would be of benefit to have their liquor licences reviewed. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.103 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:11 |
| Re-allocation of Section 37 Funds, 30 Weston Road - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to bring forward a zoning by-law amendment to Etobicoke York Community Council to amend the Section 37 provisions of By-laws 1203-2009 and 1678-2013, pertaining to 30 Weston Road, to allow up to $200,000 of the remaining $456,520.97 including accrued interest, secured and obtained for public art, to be used for capital improvements to parks and recreation facilities in Ward 11.
2. City Council direct that a community meeting(s) be held in the affected area(s) and that notice for the statutory public meeting(s) under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
3. City Council request the City Solicitor to prepare an amending Section 37 agreement to secure the amended Section 37 community benefits resulting from Recommendations 1 and 2 above, and that the amending agreement be executed prior to introduction of the Bill in Council. |
| Summary |
The rezoning for the development at 30 Weston Road was approved through By-law 1203-2009 on December 4, 2009. The Section 37 community benefits secured included a public art contribution of one percent of gross construction costs of the shell building. The developer chose the cash contribution option for the public art and paid $779,500 to the City. At the November 13, 14, 15 and 18, 2013 session of City Council, By-law 1678-2013 was approved, amending the allocation of the secured public art contribution to allow up to $325,000 to be used towards park improvements in Ward 11. With accrued interest, the current balance of the funds available exclusively for public art is $456,520.97 of which $250,000 has already been allocated towards a public art project currently underway. This leaves a balance of $206,520.97 in available funds for public art in Ward 11.
Over the past five years, I have been working with area residents to revitalize Swanek Park. Funding for this project was to come, in part, through Section 37 monies secured through a rezoning application for 2062 to 2070 Weston Road, which was approved at the February 6 and 7, 2012 meeting of City Council. As this development has not yet moved forward, and consequently these funds have not yet been paid to the City, we are unable to proceed with the next phase of the park's revitalization, which includes playground enhancements and a walking path around the park.
Until recently, Swanek Park had serious drainage issues which rendered the park virtually unusable during the spring and summer months. Phase 1 of the park's revitalization has been able to correct this, and residents are anxious for the City to move forward with the next phase in this park's revitalization so that the community can begin to enjoy this local park once more. As the funds allocated towards improvements at this park had to be used to address the drainage issues, funds are required to now implement the community's vision for the park. For this reason, it would be worthwhile to reallocate an additional $200,000 of the public art funds secured through the Section 37 agreement for 30 Weston Road to address park improvements in Ward 11 so that work can continue at Swanek Park.
A rezoning and amending Section 37 agreement is necessary to reallocate the Section 37 funds.
This motion is urgent as without confirmed funding, Parks, Forestry and Recreation cannot move forward with plans for new playground equipment and walking path in 2015. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.104 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:24 |
| Response to Inquiry for a Helipad at 1325 Lawrence Avenue East / 30 Railside Road - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:
1. City Council advise Transport Canada and the proponent that City Council is not in support of the establishment of a helipad at 1325 Lawrence Avenue East/30 Railside Road and that should the proponent wish to proceed with the proposed licensing of a helipad at that location, the proposal should go through a public consultation process with an opportunity for City Council to make its position known to Transport Canada after full consideration of the public input and the advice of City staff.
2. In the event the proponent indicates a desire to proceed with the application, City Council request the Director Community Planning, North York District, to report to City Council through the North York Community Council on the public consultation process and the appropriateness of a helipad at this location from a land use perspective.
3. City Council request Transport Canada not to grant any permission for the proposed helipad at 1325 Lawrence Avenue East/30 Railside Road until City Council has had an opportunity to consider the report of the Director of Community Planning, North York District. |
| Summary |
Community Planning, North York District, has received an inquiry about establishing a helipad at 1325 Lawrence Avenue East and 30 Railside Road. The property is on the south side of Lawrence Avenue East near Victoria Park Road and is in an employment area. A low rise residential neighbourhood is located on the north side of Lawrence Avenue East. A helipad is not a permitted use in the zoning by-law for the subject property and is also not an accessory use. In the former City of North York, a helipad is permitted in the Airport Hazard Area zone at Downsview or as an accessory use in a Hospital Zone. It is appropriate that potential impacts of establishing a helipad in proximity to a low scale residential neighbourhood be subject to public input and an opportunity for City Council to make its position on the application known to Transport Canada before any license is issued by Transport Canada. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.105 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Recognition of Service of the Deputy Mayor - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:
1. City Council official recognize the contributions of Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly and thank him for his service. |
| Summary |
At its Special Meetings on November 15 and 18, 2013, City Council delegated some of its powers and duties that are not assigned to the Mayor by statute to the Deputy Mayor, including: chairing the Executive Committee, appointing a selection panel of the recruitment of the City's Accountability Officers and chairing or designating a chair of the panel, sitting as a member and chair of the Toronto Emergency Management Program Committee and the Control Group which directs emergency operations, and chairing the City's Debenture Committee and Striking Committee.
The Deputy Mayor has worked tirelessly in taking on these additional responsibilities. The time served and additional duties taken on by the Deputy Mayor should be recognized by Toronto City Council. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.106 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:6 |
| Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards playing field improvements at James S. Bell Junior Middle School - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:
1. After the registration of a Section 37 Agreement for 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West and the receipt by the City of the $1,327,500 contribution for capital improvement projects in Ward 6 as authorized by the zoning by-law approved by the Ontario Municipal Board on July 8, 2014, City Council increase the Operating Budget for Non-Program in the year the funds are received by $105,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the playing fields located at James S. Bell Junior Middle School.
2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board after the City has received the funds and the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
3. City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the playing fields at James S. Bell Junior Middle School after the City has received the funds, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
4. City Council request the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff. |
| Summary |
This motion seeks to support improvements to the playing fields at James S. Bell Junior Middle School. The funds will go towards a soccer field and running track.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $1,327,500 have been secured by an Order of the Ontario Municipal Board dated July 8, 2014 that approves a zoning by-law for lands at 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West. The funds are to be used for capital improvement projects in Ward 6. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $105,000 to the Toronto District School Board towards the cost of improvements to the playing fields at James S. Bell Junior Middle School, located in Ward 6.
A Community Access Agreement to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at the school. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Toronto District School Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.107 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:23 |
| Ontario Municipal Board respecting Site Plan Application 14 150544 NNY 23 SA at 49 Sheppard Avenue East and 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing with respect to the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Control application appeals to permit a temporary parking lot by the owners of 49 Sheppard Avenue East and 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 Bonnington Place, and support a settlement of the appeal subject to appropriate site plan conditions being secured. |
| Summary |
City Council at its meeting of May 21-23, 2002 adopted Official Plan Amendment 521 (By-law 351-2002) and Zoning By-law 480-2002. The effect of these amendments deleted parking lots as a permitted use in the C7 zone on Sheppard Avenue east of Yonge Street, prohibited front yard parking and introduced a requirement for a 1.5 metre landscaping buffer strip where a permitted parking area abuts Sheppard Avenue. The applicant's properties at 49 Sheppard Avenue East and 24 Bonnington Place were impacted by the zoning amendment.
On July 16, 2002 the applicant appealed Zoning By-law 480-2002 to the Ontario Municipal Board. Prehearing conferences have been held on June 21, 2010, November 14, 2012 and February 26, 2013.
An Ontario Municipal Board Hearing has been scheduled for October 22, 2014 respecting 49 Sheppard Avenue East and 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place to hear the appeals of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments. City Council at its meeting of May 6, 2014 adopted Item #MM 51.50 which granted authority for the City Solicitor, together with City Planning Staff and other appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board respecting the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the above-noted properties.
Since the time of the May Council meeting, the applicant has filed a Site Plan application to permit a temporary parking lot on the subject properties which is not permitted in a C7 zone. The Site Plan Application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.
At a July 16, 2014 Pre-Hearing, the Board decided that the site plan application for the temporary parking lot would be heard in conjunction with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for the temporary parking lot. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.108 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:9 |
| St. Norbert Catholic School Site - Expropriations - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council request that the Toronto Catholic District School Board inform local community residents of the Board's plans for the expansion of St. Norbert Catholic School.
2. City Council request that the Toronto Catholic District School Board cease its plans to expropriate additional residences in the St. Norbert Catholic School community, until community consultations are held. |
| Summary |
Local residents are in the dark about the Toronto Catholic District School Board's intentions with respect to the future of the St. Norbert Catholic School site and the Board has not been forthcoming with the local community. City planners ought to be consulted about changes concerning land use, massing and other planning-related matters. This has not occurred, despite the attempts of City of Toronto planners. Expropriation attempts by the School Board have already begun in the neighbourhood, causing severe upheaval for local homeowners. In fact, the health and well-being of senior residents have been compromised by these Toronto Catholic District School Board actions. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.109 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:38 |
| Reallocation of Section 37 Funds, from Various Developments, for Capital Improvements in the Vicinity of the Scarborough City Centre - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to bring forward zoning by-law amendments to the Scarborough Community Council pertaining to 61, 63-77 Town Centre Court and 115-125 Omni Drive; 20-78 and 80 Corporate Drive; and 740 Progress Avenue, to amend the Section 37 provisions to authorize additional capital improvements with respect to the funds previously secured but no longer needed for the original purposes.
2. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, in consultation with other affected Divisions and program staff, to consider the allocation of uncommitted funds pertaining to the Section 37 provisions for additional community benefits in the vicinity of the Scarborough City Centre, including:
- local park improvements; - Scarborough Civic Centre streetscape improvements; - public library improvements; - community gardens; - pedestrian and cycling facilities; and - animal shelters.
with the intent to recommend any amendments to the by-laws to reflect current community needs and to co-ordinate these community benefits effectively with the community benefits that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area.
3. City Council direct that a community meeting be held in the affected area and that notice for the statutory public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
4. City Council request the City Solicitor to prepare agreements amending the respective Section 37 agreements to secure the amended Section 37 community benefits resulting from Parts 1, 2 and 3, above, and that the amending agreement be executed prior to introduction of the Bill in Council. |
| Summary |
Section 37 funds were secured for a variety of purposes from the following developments prior to the amalgamation of the City: 61, 63-77 Town Centre Court and 115-125 Omni Drive; 20-78 and 80 Corporate Drive; and 740 Progress Avenue.
All funds have been received and a portion of the funds from those developments have been spent for the purposes as stated in the zoning by-law and Section 37 agreements. Currently, there remain outstanding balances which have accrued interest in the Section 37 Planning Act Reserve Fund. The remaining balances may no longer be needed for the original purposes. There are various local capital improvement projects that need additional funding or are currently unfunded, but could be completed utilizing the residual balances sitting unused from decades old Section 37 agreements.
This Motion recommends that the Section 37 provisions of the site-specific zoning by-laws be amended to specify that any of the secured and uncommitted funds may be used for various capital improvements including improvements to the streetscape of the Scarborough Civic Centre, local parks, local playgrounds, local library and local animal shelters. A Community Consultation Meeting will form part of the rezoning process. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.110 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:22 |
| Mt. Pleasant Village BIA - Release of Section 37 Funds from 30 Roehampton Avenue and 2345 Yonge Street for a Streetscape Master Plan - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $30,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 30 Roehampton Avenue and 2345 Yonge Street (source account: XR3026-3700506), to provide one-time funding of $30,000.00 to the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area to conduct a Streetscape Masterplan for that portion of Mount Pleasant Road between Eglinton and Davisville Avenues.
2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area upon the signing of an Undertaking by the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, including a requirement that the consultant developing the Streetscape Masterplan consult with staff from Transportation Services, City Planning and Economic Development and Culture.
3. City Council direct that the RFP for the Streetscape Masterplan include a provision that the local Councillor, the South Eglinton Residents' and Ratepayers' Association and the Davisville Village community be consulted in its development. |
| Summary |
Authority is being sought to amend the Operating Budget for Non-Program by $30,000, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits, for the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) to design a Streetscape Masterplan for the purposes of implementing capital improvements.
With the Mount Pleasant Crosstown station set to open at the intersection of Eglinton and Mount Pleasant in 2020, it is imperative that the BIA start developing a unified streetscape design as soon as possible.
The BIA has worked with City staff on the costing of the Masterplan and will seek their advice on the tendering process and the prospective firms. This plan will help improve the walkability of and attractiveness of the street which will, in turn, help attract new businesses to the neighbourhood.
The Masterplan for the streetscape on Mount Pleasant will be developed in consultation with the local Councilllor, the South Eglinton Residents' and Ratepayers' Association and the Davisville Village community.
Section 37 funds in the amount of $1,325,086.85 inclusive of accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 30 Roehampton Avenue and 2345 Yonge Street for a series of community benefits including streetscape improvements.
The BIA will be required to sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City. |
| Motion without Notice |
| MM55.111 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:9 |
| Restricted Access to Fire Hydrant Safety Hazard - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata |
| * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair. * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate. |
| Recommendations |
Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with staff from Toronto Fire Services, Toronto Police Services and Emergency Medical Services to explore enhancements for Emergency Service access to the intersections of George Appleton Way and Keele Street; James Finlay Way and Wilson Avenue; and Keele Street and Victory Drive, and authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake the necessary modifications including, but not limited to, removing sections of the new concrete medians, and replacing them with flexi-post barriers, or other treatments to improve Emergency Service response. |
| Summary |
A fire recently occurred at a location near these intersections and the new concrete barriers prohibited timely access to the emergency as the new medians restrict left turns at this location. |
| Bills and By-laws - Meeting 55 |
| BL55.1 | ACTION |
|
| Ward:All |
| Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills |
| Summary |
City Council will introduce and enact general bills and confirming bills. |
| Background Information |
| (September 5, 2014) Consolidated By-law Index for August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 City Council meeting
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-72986.htm) |